Management of benign liver tumors

Outcomes of Primary Tumor Excision do not Differ from Non-Resection Methods in Pediatric Mesenchymal Hamartoma of the Liver: A Rapid Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

To conduct a rapid systematic review comparing the outcomes of primary tumor resection versus non-resection on patients with hepatic mesenchymal hamartoma.

METHODS

We searched the Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases from January 1, 2000 to March 31, 2022. Studies that described cases of hepatic mesenchymal hamartoma, including management and outcomes, were included.

RESULTS

62 articles met inclusion criteria with 95 cases in total. Patients were assigned to the primary tumor resection (n = 85) or non-resection (n = 10) cohort based on the described management. Similar rates of morbidity (17% vs 20%) and mortality (6 vs 10%) were identified between cohorts. There were no differences in sex, liver lobe involvement, or tumor size among study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete tumor resection should remain the gold standard for hepatic mesenchymal hamartomas when an adequate liver remnant exists. Reports of non-resected tumors demonstrating spontaneous regression or stability with watchful waiting have poor long term follow-up and have inadequate evidence of a true mesenchymal hamartoma diagnosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Benign liver lesions 2022: Guideline for clinical practice of Associazione Italiana Studio del Fegato (AISF), Società Italiana di Radiologia Medica e Interventistica (SIRM), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Ultrasonologia in Medicina e Biologia (SIUMB), Associazione Italiana di Chirurgia Epatobilio-Pancreatica (AICEP), Società Italiana Trapianti d'Organo (SITO), Società Italiana di Anatomia Patologica e Citologia Diagnostica (SIAPEC-IAP) - Part II - Solid lesions

Benign liver lesions are increasingly diagnosed in daily clinical practice due to the growing use of imaging techniques for the study of the abdomen in patients who have non-specific symptoms and do not have an increased risk of hepatic malignancy. They include simple or parasitic hepatic cysts and solid benign tumors which differ widely in terms of prevalence, clinical relevance, symptoms and natural history and often lead to significant clinical problems relating to diagnosis and clinical management. Following the need to have updated guidelines on the management of benign focal liver lesions, the Scientific Societies mainly involved in their management have promoted the drafting of a new dedicated document. This document was drawn up according to the present Italian rules and methodologies necessary to produce clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic guidelines based on evidence. Here we present the second part of the guideline, concerning the diagnosis and clinical management of hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia, and hepatocellular adenoma.

Incidental Liver Lesions in children: A practical and evidence-based approach

Incidental liver lesions are increasingly being discovered in the context of the increased use of ultrasound studies and the majority are benign. In children, although individually rare, the differential diagnosis is broad and therefore a systematic approach is of utmost importance to reduce the radiological and disease burden in children and their families. This review article collected current evidence and provides fundamental information for the clinician regarding specific differential diagnoses and unique imaging features of benign liver lesions in children. Ultimately, we propose a practical stepwise approach mainly involving clinical and radiological workup. Laboratory tests and histopathological examination may be necessary in the presence of red flags or in indeterminate lesions.

Scoping review of clinical practice guidelines on the management of benign liver tumours

Objective

Benign liver tumours (BLT) are increasingly diagnosed as incidentalomas. Clinical implications and management vary across and within the different types of BLT. High-quality clinical practice guidelines are needed, because of the many nuances in tumour types, diagnostic modalities, and conservative and invasive management strategies. Yet, available observational evidence is subject to interpretation which may lead to practice variation. Therefore, we aimed to systematically search for available clinical practice guidelines on BLT, to critically appraise them, and to compare management recommendations.

Design

A scoping review was performed within MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science. All BLT guidelines published in peer-reviewed, and English language journals were eligible for inclusion. Clinical practice guidelines on BLT were analysed, compared, and critically appraised using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) checklist regarding hepatic haemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations (PRISMA) for scoping reviews were adhered to.

Results

The literature search yielded unique 367 papers, 348 were excluded after screening of title/abstract, and 16 after full-text screening. Three guidelines were included: the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG; 2014), Brazilian Society of Hepatology (SBH; 2015), and European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL; 2016). There was no uniformity in the assessment methods for grading and gravity of recommendations between guidelines. Among observed differences were: (1) indications for biopsy in all three tumours; (2) advices on contraceptive pills and follow-up in FNH and HCA; (3) use of an individualised approach to HCA; (4) absence of recommendations for treatment of HCA in men; and (5) approaches to HCA subtype identification on magnetic resonance imaging.

Conclusion

Recognising differences in recommendations can assist in harmonisation of practice standards and identify unmet needs in research. This may ultimately contribute to improved global patient care.