1
|
Tham JLM, Ng SP, Khor R, Wada M, Gan H, Thai AA, Corry J, Bahig H, Mäkitie AA, Nuyts S, De Bree R, Strojan P, Ng WT, Eisbruch A, Chow JCH, Ferlito A. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Recurrent and Oligometastatic Head and Neck Tumours. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3020. [PMID: 38892731 PMCID: PMC11173254 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
The treatment of head and neck cancers (HNCs) encompasses a complex paradigm involving a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment. Locoregional recurrence is a common cause of treatment failure, and few patients are suitable for salvage surgery. Reirradiation with conventional radiation techniques is challenging due to normal tissue tolerance limits and the risk of significant toxicities. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a highly conformal modality that offers the potential for cure while limiting the dose to surrounding tissue. There is also growing research that shows that those with oligometastatic disease can benefit from curative intent local ablative therapies such as SBRT. This review will look at published evidence regarding the use of SBRT in locoregional recurrent and oligometastatic HNCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jodie L. M. Tham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne 3084, Australia
| | - Sweet Ping Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne 3084, Australia
| | - Richard Khor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne 3084, Australia
| | - Morikatsu Wada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne 3084, Australia
| | - Hui Gan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne 3084, Australia
| | - Alesha A. Thai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne 3084, Australia
| | - June Corry
- GenesisCare, St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne 3065, Australia
| | - Houda Bahig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de L’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada
| | - Antti A. Mäkitie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Research Program in Systems Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, 00100 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sandra Nuyts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Remco De Bree
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Primož Strojan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Wai Tong Ng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Avraham Eisbruch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - James C. H. Chow
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queens Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Alfio Ferlito
- International Head and Neck Scientific Group, 35100 Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kroeze SGC, Pavic M, Stellamans K, Lievens Y, Becherini C, Scorsetti M, Alongi F, Ricardi U, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Westhoff P, But-Hadzic J, Widder J, Geets X, Bral S, Lambrecht M, Billiet C, Sirak I, Ramella S, Giovanni Battista I, Benavente S, Zapatero A, Romero F, Zilli T, Khanfir K, Hemmatazad H, de Bari B, Klass DN, Adnan S, Peulen H, Salinas Ramos J, Strijbos M, Popat S, Ost P, Guckenberger M. Metastases-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy in combination with targeted therapy or immunotherapy: systematic review and consensus recommendations by the EORTC-ESTRO OligoCare consortium. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:e121-e132. [PMID: 36858728 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00752-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with metastatic cancer, especially when characterised by a low tumour burden (ie, oligometastatic disease), receiving targeted therapy or immunotherapy has become a frequently practised and guideline-supported treatment strategy. Despite the increasing use in routine clinical practice, there is little information on the safety of combining SBRT with modern targeted therapy or immunotherapy and a paucity of high-level evidence to guide clinical management. A systematic literature review was performed to identify the toxicity profiles of combined metastases-directed SBRT and targeted therapy or immunotherapy. These results served as the basis for an international Delphi consensus process among 28 interdisciplinary experts who are members of the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) OligoCare consortium. Consensus was sought about risk mitigation strategies of metastases-directed SBRT combined with targeted therapy or immunotherapy; a potential need for and length of interruption to targeted therapy or immunotherapy around SBRT delivery; and potential adaptations of radiation dose and fractionation. Results of this systematic review and consensus process compile the best available evidence for safe combination of metastases-directed SBRT and targeted therapy or immunotherapy for patients with metastatic or oligometastatic cancer and aim to guide today's clinical practice and the design of future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie G C Kroeze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Centre for Radiation Oncology KSA-KSB, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Matea Pavic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Karin Stellamans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, AZ Groeninge Campus Kennedylaan, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Yolande Lievens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Carlotta Becherini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Paulien Westhoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Jasna But-Hadzic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Joachim Widder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Xavier Geets
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, MIRO-IREC Lab, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Samuel Bral
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Maarten Lambrecht
- Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, Leuvens Kanker Instituut, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Igor Sirak
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - Sara Ramella
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Sergi Benavente
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fabiola Romero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Kaouthar Khanfir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Valais, Sion, Switzerland
| | - Hossein Hemmatazad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Berardino de Bari
- Service Radio-Oncologie Neuchåtel Hôpital Network, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland
| | - Desiree N Klass
- Institute of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Shaukat Adnan
- Department of Oncology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, UK
| | - Heike Peulen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Juan Salinas Ramos
- Radiation Oncology Department, Santa Lucia General University Hospital, Cartagena, Spain
| | - Michiel Strijbos
- Department of Oncology, GasthuisZusters Antwerpen, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | | | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Biau J, Lopez L, Thivat E, Casile M, Millardet C, Saroul N, Pham-Dang N, Molnar I, Bourhis J, Lapeyre M. Postoperative SBRT in the Treatment of Early-Stage Oropharyngeal and Oral Cavity Cancers with High-Risk Margins: a dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy with or without non-coplanar arcs and acute toxicity outcomes from the STEREOPOSTOP GORTEC 2017-03 phase 2 trial. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 38:169-174. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
4
|
Borghesi S, Aristei C, Marampon F. Doses, fractionations, constraints for stereotactic radiotherapy. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2022; 27:10-14. [PMID: 35402033 PMCID: PMC8989440 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2021.0139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper describes how to select the most appropriate stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT ) dose and fractionation scheme according to lesion size and site, organs at risk (OARs) proximity and the biological effective dose. In single-dose SRT, 15-34 Gy are generally used while in fractionated SRT 30 and 75 Gy in 2-5 fractions are administered. The ICRU Report No. 91, which is specifically dedicated to SRT treatments, provided indications for dose prescription (with its definition and essential steps), dose delivery and optimal coverage which was defined as the best planning target volume coverage that can be obtained in the irradiated district. Calculation algorithms and OAR s dose constraints are provided as well as treatment planning system characteristics, suggested beam energy and multileaf collimator leaf size. Finally, parameters for irradiation geometry and plan quality are also reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Borghesi
- Radiation Oncology Unit of Arezzo-Valdarno, Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Italy
| | - Francesco Marampon
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pasqualetti F, Trippa F, Aristei C, Borghesi S, Colosimo C, Cantarella M, Mazzola R, Ingrosso G. Stereotactic radiotherapy for oligometastases in the lymph nodes. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2022; 27:46-51. [PMID: 35402021 PMCID: PMC8989441 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2022.0007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Even though systemic therapy is standard treatment for lymph node metastases, metastasis-directed stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT ) seems to be a valid option in oligometastatic patients with a low disease burden. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT ) is the gold standard for assessing metastases to the lymph nodes; co-registration of PET-CT images and planning CT images are the basis for gross tumor volume (GTV ) delineation. Appropriate techniques are needed to overcome target motion. SRT schedules depend on the irradiation site, target volume and dose constraints to the organs at risk (OARs) of toxicity. Although several fractionation schemes were reported, total doses of 48–60 Gy in 4–8 fractions were proposed for mediastinal lymph node SRT, with the spinal cord, esophagus, heart and proximal bronchial tree being the dose limiting OAR s. Total doses ranged from 30 to 45 Gy, with daily fractions of 7–12 Gy for abdominal lymph nodes, with dose limiting OARs being the liver, kidneys, bowel and bladder. SRT on lymph node metastases is safe; late side effects, particularly severe, are rare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Pasqualetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, University of Pisa, Italy
| | - Fabio Trippa
- Radiation Oncology Centre, S. Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Italy
| | - Simona Borghesi
- Radiation Oncology Unit of Arezzo-Valdarno, Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Italy
| | - Caterina Colosimo
- Operative Unit of Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, San Luca Hospital, Lucca, Italy
| | | | - Rosario Mazzola
- Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Huang TL, Chuang HC, Tsai MH, Chien CY, Su YY, Lin YT, Yang CH, Lai CC, Li SH, Fang FM. Stereotactic body radiotherapy plus cetuximab for previously irradiated un-resectable head and neck cancer. Biomed J 2021; 45:838-846. [PMID: 34749016 DOI: 10.1016/j.bj.2021.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Revised: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to explore the treatment outcomes and prognostic factors for patients with previously irradiated but unresectable recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (rHNSCC) treated by stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plus cetuximab at a single institute in Taiwan. METHODS From February 2016 to March 2019, 74 patients with previously irradiated but unresectable rHNSCC were treated with SBRT plus cetuximab. All patients received irradiation to the gross tumor and/or nodal area with 40-50 Gy in five fractions, with each fraction interval ≥ 2 days over a 2-week period by using the CyberKnife M6 machine. An18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scan was performed before treatment for treatment target delineation (n = 74) and 2 months later for response evaluation (n = 60). The median follow-up time was 9 months (range 1-36 months). RESULTS The treatment response rate was complete response: 25.0%, partial response: 41.7%, stable disease: 11.7%, and progressive disease: 21.7% based on the criteria of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (n = 72) and complete metabolic response: 21.7%, partial metabolic response: 51.7%, stable metabolic disease: 13.3%, and progressive metabolic disease: 13.3% based on PET-CT (n = 60), respectively. The 1-/2-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 42.8%/22.0% and 40.5%/19.0%, respectively. In the logistic regression model, a re-irradiation interval > 12 months was observed to be the only significant prognostic factor for a favorable treatment response. In the Cox proportional hazards model, a re-irradiation interval > 12 months and gross tumor volume (GTV) ≦ 50 ml were favorable prognostic factors of OS and PFS. CONCLUSION SBRT plus cetuximab provides a promising salvage strategy for those patients with previously irradiated but unresectable rHNSCC, especially those with a re-irradiation interval > 12 months or GTV ≦ 50 ml.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tai-Lin Huang
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hui-Ching Chuang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Hsien Tsai
- Department of Otolaryngology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Yen Chien
- Department of Otolaryngology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yan-Ye Su
- Department of Otolaryngology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Tsai Lin
- Department of Otolaryngology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Hui Yang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Chih Lai
- Department of Otolaryngology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Shau-Hsuan Li
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Fu-Min Fang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Medicine, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Huynh M, Kempson I, Bezak E, Phillips W. Predictive modeling of hypoxic head and neck cancers during fractionated radiotherapy with gold nanoparticle radiosensitization. Med Phys 2021; 48:3120-3133. [PMID: 33818799 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Intrinsic radioresistance and increased proliferation rates in head and neck cancers (HNCs) are associated with negative radiotherapy (RT) treatment responses. The use of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) as radiosensitizers could enable total radiation dose reduction and lowered radiation toxicity. AuNP radiosensitization may overcome hypoxia-induced radioresistance and treatment-induced accelerated repopulation of cancer cells in HNCs, improving radiotherapy outcomes. METHODS Tumor control was determined by considering individual cancer cell responses in probabilistic computational simulations using HYP-RT software for clinical radiotherapy doses and fractionation schedules along with three different nanoparticle administration schedules. Antagonistic tumor hypoxia and rapid tumor regrowth due to accelerated repopulation of cancers cells were taken into consideration. RESULTS Simulations indicate that tumors that are conventionally uncontrollable can be controlled with AuNP radiosensitization. In simulations where the absence of AuNPs required radiotherapy doses above standard clinical prescriptions, reoccurring AuNP administration allowed for radiation dose reductions below standard clinical dose prescriptions. For example, considering a 2 Gy per fraction radiotherapy schedule, tumor control was achieved with 57.2 ± 5.1 Gy (P = <0.0001) for weekly AuNP administration and 53.0 ± 4.0 Gy (P = <0.0001) for biweekly AuNP administration compared to 69.9 ± 5.8 Gy with no radiosensitization. CONCLUSIONS AuNPs decreased the predicted RT total doses required to achieve tumor control via total stem cell elimination, offering an optimistic prediction and method for which hypoxia-induced and rapidly growing radioresistant tumors are treated more effectively. Outcomes are also shown to be sensitive to the RT schedule with data for hyperfractionated RT indicating the greatest benefits from radiosensitization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myxuan Huynh
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Ivan Kempson
- Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA, 5095, Australia
| | - Eva Bezak
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Wendy Phillips
- Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Department of Medical Physics, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nam H, Ahn YC, Yang K, Oh D, Noh JM. Re-irradiation with Moderate Hypo-Fractionation Using Intensity Modulated Photon or Proton Radiation Therapy in Locally Recurrent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Nasopharynx. Cancer Res Treat 2021; 54:96-108. [PMID: 33781049 PMCID: PMC8756131 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2020.1349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to analyze the treatment outcomes of locally recurrent nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients following moderate hypo-fractionation re-irradiation (re-RT). Materials and Methods Sixty locally recurrent NPC patients underwent hypo-fractionation re-RT. 48.3% had rT3-4, and 30.0% did keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), with or without intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), was used in 66.7% of patients. Results With the median follow up of 22 (2~254) months, 31 patients (51.7%) died, 38 (63.3%) developed further treatment failure, and 30 (50.0%) developed ≥Grade 3 toxicity (including seven Grade 5) at time of analysis. The 2- and 5-year rates of overall survival, local failure-free survival, and ≥Grade 3 toxicity-free survival were 57.9% and 45.8%, 64.1% and 52.5%, and 54.8% and 44.9%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, worse factors for OS were iT3-4 (p=0.010) and age at re-RT ≥53 years (p=0.003), those for LFFS were rT3-4 (p=0.022) and rN0-1 (p=0.035), and those for TFS were iT3-4 (p=0.020) and rIMRT/IMPT (p=0.030), respectively. Cumulative dose or fraction size ≥3 Gy at re-RT, however, showed no significance for OS, LFFS and TFS. Conclusion Current re-RT with modern RT techniques by moderate hypo-fractionation scheme seemed feasible in treating locally recurrent NPC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heerim Nam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Chan Ahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyungmi Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dongryul Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Myoung Noh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Iqbal MS, West N, Richmond N, Kovarik J, Gray I, Willis N, Morgan D, Yazici G, Cengiz M, Paleri V, Kelly C. A systematic review and practical considerations of stereotactic body radiotherapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20200332. [PMID: 32960652 PMCID: PMC7774675 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) is gaining popularity although its use in head and neck cancer (HNC) is not well defined. The primary objective was to review the published evidence regarding the use of stereotactic radiotherapy in HNC. METHODS A literature search was performed by using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for eligible studies from 2000 to 2019 and 26 relevant studies were identified. RESULTS Literature demonstrates a heterogeneous use of this technique with regards to patient population, primary or salvage treatment, dose fractionation regimens, outcomes and follow-up protocols. Carotid blow out syndrome is a risk as with other forms of reirradiation but alternative treatment regimens may reduce this risk. CONCLUSION At present there is a lack of evidence regarding SBRT as a primary treatment option for HNC and definitive answers regarding efficacy and tolerability cannot be provided but there is growing evidence that SBRT reirradiation regimens are safe and effective. In lieu of evidence from large Phase III trials, we define appropriate organ at risk constraints and prescription doses, with accurate plan summation approaches. Prospective randomised trials are warranted to validate improved treatment outcomes and acceptable treatment morbidity. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This article provides a comprehensive review of evidence of use of stereotactic radiotherapy in HNC site (either as a primary treatment or as reirradiation). We also provide an evidence-based approach to the implementation and practical consideration of stereotactic radiotherapy in HNC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Shahid Iqbal
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Centre for Cancer Care, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Nick West
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Centre for Cancer Care, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Neil Richmond
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Centre for Cancer Care, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Josef Kovarik
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Centre for Cancer Care, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Isabel Gray
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Centre for Cancer Care, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Nick Willis
- Department of Radiotherapy Dosimetry, Northern Centre for Cancer Care, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - David Morgan
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Centre for Cancer Care, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Gozde Yazici
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Cengiz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Vinidh Paleri
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Charles Kelly
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Centre for Cancer Care, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Huynh M, Kempson I, Bezak E, Phillips W. In silico modeling of cellular probabilistic nanoparticle radiosensitization in head and neck cancers. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2020; 15:2837-2850. [DOI: 10.2217/nnm-2020-0301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The use of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) as radiosensitizers may offer a new approach in the treatment of head and neck cancers; minimizing treatment-associated toxicities and improving patient outcomes. AuNPs promote localized dose deposition; permitting improved local control and/or dose reduction. Aim: This work aimed to address the theoretical optimization of radiation doses, fractionation and nanoparticle injection schedules to maximize therapeutic benefits. Materials & methods: Probabilistic nanoparticle sensitization factors were incorporated into the individual cell-based HYP-RT computer model of tumor growth and radiotherapy. Results: Total dose outcomes across all radiation therapy treatment regimens were found to be significantly reduced with the presence of AuNPs, with bi-weekly injections showing the most decrease. Conclusion: Outcomes suggest the need for regular AuNP administration to permit effective radiosensitization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myxuan Huynh
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ivan Kempson
- Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes 5095, South Australia, Australia
| | - Eva Bezak
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Wendy Phillips
- Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Department of Medical Physics, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ho HW, Yang CC, Lin HM, Chen HY, Huang CC, Wang SC, Lin YW. The feasibility and efficacy of new SBRT technique HyperArc for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: noncoplanar cone-based robotic system vs. noncoplanar high-definition MLC based Linac system. Med Dosim 2020; 46:164-170. [PMID: 33208290 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2020.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Revised: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of HyperArc (HA) for recurrent nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) by comparing it with the CyberKnife system (CK). Fifteen patients with recurrent nasopharyngeal cancer who were treated using the noncoplanar cone-based robotic CK system were enrolled. CK was delivered with a median dose of 37.5 Gy in 5 fractions. The delivered CK treatment plans were the sources for the corresponding homogeneous HA (HA-H) and inhomogeneous HA (HA-IH) plans. The HA-H plans were generated to meet the corresponding treatment plan criteria for the CK plans. The HA-IH plans were designed to emulate the corresponding inhomogeneous CK isodose distributions. These three SBRT treatment plans were compared with target coverage, sparing of organs at risk (OARs), and dose distribution metrics. The HA-H and HA-IH plans consistently exhibited CTV and PTV coverage levels similar or better to those of the CK plans but significantly reduced the dose to OARs. Using the HA techniques (both HA-H and HA-IH plans), the mean maximal doses to the spinal cord, brainstem, optic nerves, and optic chiasm were reduced by approximately 60%, compared to the CK plans. The high dose spillage, conformity, and homogeneity indices of the HA-H plans were significantly better than those of the CK plans. The HA-IH plans showed faster dose falloff and similar conformity of the HA-H plans and dose heterogeneity of the CK plans. Here we demonstrated the HA treatment plan system for recurrent NPC is feasible, either homogeneous or inhomogeneous delivery. Excellent sparing of OARs and dosimetric distribution and very efficient delivery make HA an attractive SBRT technique for recurrent NPC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsiu-Wen Ho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Chieh Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan; Department of Pharmacy, Chia-Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Man Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan
| | - Hsiao-Yun Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Chiao Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Chang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Wei Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City 71004, Taiwan; Department of Pharmacy, Chia-Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan; Department of Health and Nutrition, Chia-Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tuleasca C, Patin D, Levivier M. Letter to the Editor. Gamma Knife surgery for trigeminal pain due to benign and malignant skull base tumors. J Neurosurg 2019; 130:1034-1036. [PMID: 30192198 DOI: 10.3171/2018.5.jns181298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Tuleasca
- 1Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center, Lausanne, Switzerland
- 3Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS5), Lausanne, Switzerland; and
| | - David Patin
- 4Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marc Levivier
- 1Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center, Lausanne, Switzerland
- 2University of Lausanne (Unil), Faculty of Biology and Medicine (FBM), Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Stanisce L, Koshkareva Y, Xu Q, Patel A, Squillante C, Ahmad N, Rajagopalan K, Kubicek GJ. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Treatment for Recurrent, Previously Irradiated Head and Neck Cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2018; 17:1533033818780086. [PMID: 29890894 PMCID: PMC6024262 DOI: 10.1177/1533033818780086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Locally recurrent, previously irradiated primary head and neck tumors have historically been associated with poor outcomes. Stereotactic body radiation therapy has emerged as a feasible and promising treatment option for tumor recurrence, particularly in nonsurgical candidates. This study aimed to assess the associated outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy used in this setting. Methods: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of 25 patients treated with CyberKnife for unresectable, recurrent head and neck cancer in a previously irradiated field. The primary end points evaluated were rates of survival, tumor control, and treatment-related toxicities. Results: Median survival of the study population was 7.5 months (range, 1.5-47.0 months). Median survival of the 20 (80%) patients who were treated with curative purpose was 8.3 months. One-year overall survival rate for the entire population was 32%. The respective 1-year and 2-year survival rates for the curative subcohort were 40% and 20%, respectively. Local and locoregional failure occurred in 8 (32%) and 7 (28%) patients, respectively. Low severe acute (4%) and late (6%) treatment-related toxicity rates were observed. No grade 4 or 5 toxicities were observed. Conclusion: Stereotactic body radiation therapy is a viable treatment option for patients with unresectable, recurrent head and neck cancer. Significant tumor control rates are achievable with minimal severe toxicity. Although perhaps associated with patient selection and a heterogeneous sample, overall survival of stereotactic body radiation therapy outcomes appears unfavorable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke Stanisce
- 1 Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ, USA
| | - Yekaterina Koshkareva
- 2 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper University, Camden, NJ, USA
| | - Qianyi Xu
- 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ, USA
| | - Ashish Patel
- 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ, USA
| | - Christian Squillante
- 4 Department of Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ, USA
| | - Nadir Ahmad
- 2 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper University, Camden, NJ, USA
| | - Kumar Rajagopalan
- 4 Department of Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ, USA
| | - Gregory J Kubicek
- 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kroeze SGC, Fritz C, Hoyer M, Lo SS, Ricardi U, Sahgal A, Stahel R, Stupp R, Guckenberger M. Toxicity of concurrent stereotactic radiotherapy and targeted therapy or immunotherapy: A systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev 2016; 53:25-37. [PMID: 28056412 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 131] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2016] [Accepted: 11/26/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Both stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and immune- or targeted therapy play an increasingly important role in personalized treatment of metastatic disease. Concurrent application of both therapies is rapidly expanding in daily clinical practice. In this systematic review we summarize severe toxicity observed after concurrent treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for English literature published up to April 2016 using keywords "radiosurgery", "local ablative therapy", "gamma knife" and "stereotactic", combined with "bevacizumab", "cetuximab", "crizotinib", "erlotinib", "gefitinib", "ipilimumab", "lapatinib", "sorafenib", "sunitinib", "trastuzumab", "vemurafenib", "PLX4032", "panitumumab", "nivolumab", "pembrolizumab", "alectinib", "ceritinib", "dabrafenib", "trametinib", "BRAF", "TKI", "MEK", "PD1", "EGFR", "CTLA-4" or "ALK". Studies performing SRT during or within 30days of targeted/immunotherapy, reporting severe (⩾Grade 3) toxicity were included. RESULTS Concurrent treatment is mostly well tolerated in cranial SRT, but high rates of severe toxicity were observed for the combination with BRAF-inhibitors. The relatively scarce literature on extra-cranial SRT shows a potential risk of increased toxicity when SRT is combined with EGFR-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors and bevacizumab, which was not observed for cranial SRT. CONCLUSIONS This review gives a best-possible overview of current knowledge and its limitations and underlines the need for a timely generation of stronger evidence in this rapidly expanding field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie G C Kroeze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Corinna Fritz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Morten Hoyer
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 N.E. Pacific Street, Box 356043, Seattle, USA
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043 Orbassano, Italy
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, 27 King's College Circle Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1, Canada
| | - Rolf Stahel
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Roger Stupp
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|