Structural and functional characterization of nerve fibres in polyneuropathy and healthy subjects

Identification of corneal and intra-epidermal axonal swellings in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

In patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), axonal spheroids in motor axons have been identified in post-mortem studies. In this study, axonal spheroids and swellings on C-fibers of ALS patients were investigated using corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) and skin biopsy, respectively.

METHODS

Thirty-one ALS patients and 20 healthy subjects were evaluated with CCM to assess corneal nerve-fiber length (CNFL), -fiber density (CNFD), -branch density (CNBD), dendritic cell (DC) density, and axonal spheroids originating from C-fibers (>100 μm2 ). In addition, intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) and axonal swellings (>1.5 μm) were assessed in skin biopsies obtained from the arms and legs of 22 patients and 17 controls.

RESULTS

In ALS patients, IENFD, CNFD, CNFL, and CNBD were not different from controls. The density of DCs and the number of patients with increased DC density were higher in ALS patients than controls (p = .0005 and p = .008). The number of patients with axonal spheroids was higher than controls (p = .03).

DISCUSSION

Evaluation of DCs and axonal bulbs in C-fibers of ALS patients could provide insights into pathophysiology or potentially serve as biomarkers in ALS.

Assessing Corneal Confocal Microscopy and Other Small Fiber Measures in Diabetic Polyneuropathy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Damage to small nerve fibers is common in diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN), and the diagnosis of DPN relies on subjective symptoms and signs in a combination with objective confirmatory tests, typically electrophysiology or intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) from skin biopsy. Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) has been introduced as a tool to detect DPN. However, it is unclear if CCM can reliably be used to diagnose DPN and how the technique compares with other commonly used measures of small fiber damage, such as IENFD, cold detection threshold (CDT), and warm detection threshold (WDT). Therefore, we assessed and compared the use of CCM, IENFD, CDT, and WDT in the diagnosis of DPN in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

In this cohort study, the participants underwent detailed neurologic examination, electrophysiology, quantification of IENFD, CCM, and quantitative sensory testing. Definition of DPN was made in accordance with the Toronto criteria for diabetic neuropathy (without relying on IENFD and thermal thresholds).

RESULTS

A total of 214 patients with at least probable DPN, 63 patients without DPN, and 97 controls without diabetes were included. Patients with DPN had lower CCM measures (corneal nerve fiber length [CNFL], nerve fiber density, and branch density), IENFD, CDT, and WDT compared with patients without DPN (p ≤ 0.001, <0.001, 0.002, p < 0.001, p = 0.003, and <0.005, respectively), whereas there was no difference between controls and patients with diabetes without DPN. All 3 CCM measures showed a very low diagnostic sensitivity with CNFL showing the highest (14.4% [95% CI 9.8-18.4]) and a specificity of 95.7% (88.0-99.1). In comparison, the sensitivity of abnormal CDT and/or WDT was 30.5% (24.4-37.0) with a specificity of 84.9% (74.6-92.2). The sensitivity of abnormal IENFD was highest among all measures with a value of 51.1% (43.7-58.5) and a specificity of 90% (79.5-96.2). CCM measures did not correlate with IENFD, CDT/WDT, or neuropathy severity in the group of patients with DPN.

DISCUSSION

CCM measures showed the lowest sensitivity compared with other small fiber measures in the diagnosis of DPN. This indicates that CCM is not a sensitive method to detect DPN in recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that CCM measures aid in the detection of DPN in recently diagnosed type 2 diabetics but with a low sensitivity when compared with other small fiber measures.

Characterization of Patients With and Without Painful Peripheral Neuropathy After Receiving Neurotoxic Chemotherapy: Traditional Quantitative Sensory Testing vs C-Fiber and Aδ-Fiber Selective Diode Laser Stimulation

Painful chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common complication of chemotherapy with drugs such as taxanes and platinum compounds. Currently, no methods are available for early detection of sensory changes that are associated with painful CIPN, nor are there biomarkers that are specific to painful CIPN. This study aimed to compare Diode Laser fiber type-selective stimulator (DLss), a method to selectively stimulate cutaneous C and Aδ fibers, to traditional quantitative sensory testing (QST) in determining psychophysical differences between patients with painful CIPN and a control group. Sensory testing was performed on the dorsal mid-foot of 20 patients with painful neuropathy after taxane- or platinum-based chemotherapy, and 20 patients who received similar neurotoxic chemotherapy, without painful CIPN. In a multivariable analysis, C-fiber to Aδ fiber detection threshold ratio, measured by DLss, was significantly different between the groups (P <.05). While QST parameters such as warmth detection threshold were different between the groups in univariate analyses, these findings were likely attributable to group differences in patient age and cumulative chemotherapy dose. PERSPECTIVE: In this study, fiber-specific DLss test showed potential in identifying sensory changes that are specific for painful neuropathy, encouraging future testing of this approach as a biomarker for early detection of painful CIPN. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the Washington University Institutional Review Board (#201807162) and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03687970).

Effects of progressive resistance training in individuals with type 2 diabetic polyneuropathy: a randomised assessor-blinded controlled trial

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of progressive resistance training (PRT) on muscle strength, intraepidermal nerve fibre density (IENFD) and motor function in individuals with type 2 diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) and to compare potential adaptations to those of individuals with type 2 diabetes without DPN and healthy controls.

METHODS

This was an assessor-blinded trial conducted at the Neurology department, Aarhus University Hospital. Adults with type 2 diabetes, with and without DPN and healthy control participants were randomised to either supervised PRT or non-PRT for 12 weeks. Allocation was concealed by a central office unrelated to the study. The co-primary outcomes were muscle strength in terms of the peak torque of the knee and ankle extensors and flexors, and IENFD. Secondary outcome measures included the 6 min walk test (6MWT), five-time sit-to-stand test (FTSST) and postural stability index obtained by static posturography.

RESULTS

A total of 109 individuals were enrolled in three groups (type 2 diabetes with DPN [n = 42], type 2 diabetes without DPN [n = 32] and healthy control [n = 35]). PRT resulted in muscle strength gains of the knee extensors and flexors in all three groups using comparative analysis (DPN group, PRT 10.3 ± 9.6 Nm vs non-PRT -0.4 ± 8.2 Nm; non-DPN group, PRT 7.5 ± 5.8 Nm vs non-PRT 0.6 ± 8.8 Nm; healthy control group, PRT 6.3 ± 9.0 Nm vs non-PRT -0.4 ± 8.4 Nm; p<0.05, respectively). Following PRT the DPN group improved the 6MWT (PRT 34.6 ± 40.9 m vs non-PRT 2.7 ± 19.6 m; p=0.001) and the FTSST (PRT -1.5 ± 2.2 s vs non-PRT 1.5 ± 4.6 s; p=0.02). There was no change in IENFD following PRT in any of the groups.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

PRT improved muscle strength of the knee extensors and flexors and motor function in individuals with type 2 diabetic polyneuropathy at levels comparable with those seen in individuals with diabetes without DPN and healthy control individuals, while no effects were observed in IENFD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03252132 FUNDING: Research reported in this paper is part of the International Diabetic Neuropathy Consortium (IDNC) research programme, supported by a Novo Nordisk Foundation Challenge Program grant (grant no. NNF14OC0011633) and Aarhus University.

Transient hypoalgesia after COVID-19 infection

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. In-depth phenotype analysis of a patient after COVID-19 disease in spring 2020 with long-lasting dysgeusia and transient hypoalgesia as supported by clinical examination, reduced axon flare reaction and loss of intraepidermal fibers.

Introduction:

Loss of smell or taste are often-cited complications during COVID-19 disease, but there is no clear evidence for affection of the peripheral nervous system.

Methods:

Here, we report a 48-year-old man presenting with persistent dysgeusia and hypoalgesia of the lower legs, hands, and cheeks after COVID-19 infection in Spring 2020.

Results:

Upon clinical examination 7 months after the infection, the patient could not feel pain after pinprick stimuli. Quantitative sensory testing revealed increased thermal detection thresholds at the face but no changes at the foot. Electrical C-fiber stimulation elicited lower pain ratings at the distal leg compared with the proximal leg, but overall higher pain ratings than in healthy control subjects. The axon flare reaction in response to histamine and acetylcholine was almost absent with no pain sensation. Skin punch biopsy revealed a reduced intraepidermal nerve fiber density at the lower leg, and transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 and calcitonin gene-related peptide immunoreactivity were similar to a healthy control. Symptoms and positive tests improved 5 months later.

Conclusion:

In summary, we describe a case of hypoalgesia after COVID-19 disease. Studies investigating long-COVID syndrome should test not only for painful neuropathic symptoms but also for hypoalgesia, especially in patients with prolonged dysgeusia.

Progression and regression of nerve fibre pathology and dysfunction early in diabetes over 5 years

It has been traditionally suggested that the early development of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN) is characterized by a predominant and progressive injury to small nerve fibres followed by large fibre impairment. We alternatively hypothesized that small and large fibre damage due to DSPN in type 1 and type 2 diabetes could develop in parallel and may not only be progressive but also reversible. Participants from the German Diabetes Study baseline cohort with recent-onset type 1/type 2 diabetes (n = 350/570) and age-matched glucose-tolerant control individuals (Control 1/Control 2: n = 114/190) were assessed by nerve conduction studies (NCS), thermal detection thresholds (TDT), vibration perception threshold (VPT), Neuropathy Symptom Score (NSS), Neuropathy Disability Score (NDS), and intraepidermal nerve fibre density (IENFD) in skin biopsies (type 1/type 2 diabetes: n = 102/226; Control 1/Control 2: n = 109/208). Subsets of participants with type 1/type 2 diabetes were followed for 5 years (n = 184/307; IENFD subset: n = 18/69). DSPN was defined by the Toronto Consensus criteria. At baseline, DSPN was present in 8.1 and 13.3% of the type 1 and type 2 diabetes groups, respectively. The most frequently abnormal tests in the lower limbs below or above the 2.5th and 97.5th centile of the controls were IENFD (13.7%) and individual NCS (up to 9.4%) in type 1 diabetes participants and IENFD (21.8%), malleolar VPT (17.5%), and individual NCS (up to 11.8%) in those with type 2 diabetes, whereas TDT abnormalities did not differ between the control and diabetes groups. After 5 years in type 2 diabetes participants, the highest progression rates from the normal to the abnormal range were found for IENFD (18.8%) by -4.1 ± 2.8 fibres/mm, malleolar VPT (18.6%) by 9.1 ± 20.2 µm, and NDS (15.0%) by 3.7 ± 1.5 points, while vice versa the highest regression rates were observed for NDS (11.2%) by -3.1 ± 1.3 points, sural nerve amplitude (9.1%) by 4.7 ± 3.0 µV, IENFD (8.7%) by 1.4 ± 1.3 fibres/mm, and NSS (8.2%) by -5.8 ± 1.6 points. In type 1 diabetes participants, no major progression was seen after 5 years, but subclinical DSPN regressed in 10.3%. These findings point to an early parallel damage to both small and large nerve fibres in well-controlled recent-onset type 2 and, to a lesser extent, type 1 diabetes. After 5 years peripheral nerve morphology and function and clinical measures progress to the abnormal range in type 2 diabetes, but initial nerve alterations are also reversible to a meaningful degree.

Axonal swellings are related to type 2 diabetes, but not to distal diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Distal diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSP) is a common complication of diabetes with many patients showing a reduction of intraepidermal nerve fibre density (IENFD) from skin biopsy, a validated and sensitive diagnostic tool for the assessment of DSP. Axonal swelling ratio is a morphological quantification altered in DSP. It is, however, unclear if axonal swellings are related to diabetes or DSP. The aim of this study was to investigate how axonal swellings in cutaneous nerve fibres are related to type 2 diabetes mellitus, DSP and neuropathic pain in a well-defined cohort of patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

A total of 249 participants, from the Pain in Neuropathy Study (UK) and the International Diabetic Neuropathy Consortium (Denmark), underwent a structured neurological examination, nerve conduction studies, quantitative sensory testing and skin biopsy. The study included four groups: healthy control study participants without diabetes (n = 45); participants with type 2 diabetes without DSP (DSP-; n = 31); and participants with evidence of DSP (DSP+; n = 173); the last were further separated into painless DSP+ (n = 74) and painful DSP+ (n = 99). Axonal swellings were defined as enlargements on epidermal-penetrating fibres exceeding 1.5 μm in diameter. Axonal swelling ratio is calculated by dividing the number of axonal swellings by the number of intraepidermal nerve fibres.

RESULTS

Median (IQR) IENFD (fibres/mm) was: 6.7 (5.2-9.2) for healthy control participants; 6.2 (4.4-7.3) for DSP-; 1.3 (0.5-2.2) for painless DSP+; and 0.84 (0.4-1.6) for painful DSP+. Swelling ratios were calculated for all participants and those with IENFD > 1.0 fibre/mm. When only those participants with IENFD > 1.0 fibre/mm were included, the axonal swelling ratio was higher in participants with type 2 diabetes when compared with healthy control participants (p < 0.001); however, there was no difference between DSP- and painless DSP+ participants, or between painless DSP+ and painful DSP+ participants. The axonal swelling ratio correlated weakly with HbA_1c (r = 0.16, p = 0.04), but did not correlate with the Toronto Clinical Scoring System (surrogate measure of DSP severity), BMI or type 2 diabetes duration.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

In individuals with type 2 diabetes where IENFD is >1.0 fibre/mm, axonal swelling ratio is related to type 2 diabetes but is not related to DSP or painful DSP. Axonal swellings may be an early marker of sensory nerve injury in type 2 diabetes.

Painful and non-painful diabetic neuropathy, diagnostic challenges and implications for future management

Peripheral neuropathy is one of the most common complications of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Up to half of patients with diabetes develop neuropathy during the course of their disease, which is accompanied by neuropathic pain in 30-40% of cases. Peripheral nerve injury in diabetes can manifest as progressive distal symmetric polyneuropathy, autonomic neuropathy, radiculo-plexopathies, and mononeuropathies. The most common diabetic neuropathy is distal symmetric polyneuropathy, which we will refer to as DN, with its characteristic glove and stocking like presentation of distal sensory or motor function loss. DN or its painful counterpart, painful DN, are associated with increased mortality and morbidity; thus, early recognition and preventive measures are essential. Nevertheless, it is not easy to diagnose DN or painful DN, particularly in patients with early and mild neuropathy, and there is currently no single established diagnostic gold standard. The most common diagnostic approach in research is a hierarchical system, which combines symptoms, signs, and a series of confirmatory tests. The general lack of long-term prospective studies has limited the evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of new morphometric and neurophysiological techniques. Thus, the best paradigm for screening DN and painful DN both in research and in clinical practice remains uncertain. Herein, we review the diagnostic challenges from both clinical and research perspectives and their implications for managing patients with DN. There is no established DN treatment, apart from improved glycaemic control, which is more effective in type 1 than in type 2 diabetes, and only symptomatic management is available for painful DN. Currently, less than one-third of patients with painful DN derive sufficient pain relief with existing pharmacotherapies. A more precise and distinct sensory profile from patients with DN and painful DN may help identify responsive patients to one treatment versus another. Detailed sensory profiles will lead to tailored treatment for patient subgroups with painful DN by matching to novel or established DN pathomechanisms and also for improved clinical trials stratification. Large randomized clinical trials are needed to identify the interventions, i.e. pharmacological, physical, cognitive, educational, etc., which lead to the best therapeutic outcomes.

Increased peptidergic fibers as a potential cutaneous marker of pain in diabetic small fiber neuropathy

ABSTRACT

Diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) is a common complication of diabetes and is often associated with neuropathic pain. The mechanisms underlying development and maintenance of painful DPN are largely unknown, and quantification of intraepidermal nerve fiber density from skin biopsy, one of the neuropathological gold standard when diagnosing DPN, does not differentiate between patients with and without pain. Identification of possible pain pathophysiological biomarkers in patients with painful DPN may increase our knowledge of mechanisms behind neuropathic pain. Animal models of painful DPN have been shown to have an increased density of peptidergic nerve fibers (substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide). In this study, we performed a detailed skin biopsy analysis in a well-characterized group of DPN patients with primarily small fiber involvement, with and without pain, and in healthy controls and test for correlation between skin biopsy findings and pain intensity and quantitative sensory testing. We found that although there was no difference in intraepidermal nerve fiber density using protein gene product 9.5 between patients with and without pain, patients with pain had increased density of dermal peptidergic fibers containing substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide compared with patients with painless DPN and healthy controls. Peptidergic nerve fiber density correlated with pain ratings in patients with pain (R = 0.33; P = 0.019), but not with quantitative sensory testing results. In this article, we show, for the first time in humans, an increased density of dermal peptidergic fibers in painful DPN. These findings provide new insight in the pathophysiological mechanisms of pain in diabetes and open the research towards new therapeutic targets.

Pain and small-fiber affection in hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies (HNPP)

Background and aims Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies (HNPP) is an autosomal - dominant hereditary neuropathy caused by a deficiency in the peripheral protein PMP-22, due to deletion on chromosome 17p11,2 or in some rare cases point mutations in the PMP-22 gene. The clinical picture is characterized by recurrent mononeuropathies in nerves which frequently may be exposed to pressure, such as the median, ulnar, radial and peroneal nerves or also a more general neuropathy. Although pain is reported to be an unusual clinical symptom, there have been reports of pain in a surprisingly high proportion of these patients. Since pain may be explained by mechanisms in afferent small unmyelinated C- nerve fibers, an assessment of the function of small nerve fibers has been requested. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the presence of pain and the possible affection of afferent small nerve-fibers, A-δ and C-fibers, by quantitative sensory testing (QST)-assessment of thermal thresholds, as well as quantitative sudomotor axon reflex (QSART), a quantitative, validated assessment of efferent postganglionic sumodotor function. QST values were compared to values of age- and sex matched healthy subjects. Methods The 19 patients were investigated clinically, with an emphasis on pain characteristics, with nerve conduction studies (NCS) of major nerves in upper- and lower extremity, small fiber testing (QST, measurement of thermal thresholds) and with QSART. Results A total of 10 patients reported numbness in some extremity, suggesting entrapment of individual nerves as well as a general neuropathy, as verified by NCS in nine patients. A total of 15 patients had findings compatible with a general polyneuropathy. A total of eight patients reported pain, seven patients with pain in the feet, described as burning, aching, shooting and six with severe pathological QST values, mainly cold detection, but also four patients with elevated thresholds to warmth. Four of the patients had signs of a severe sensory neuropathy on NCS, with no sural findings. One patient had only pain in the arms, with only minor changes on NCS and with normal QST-values. Cold detection thresholds (CD) were significantly elevated (reduced sensibility) on the dorsum of the foot (mean of two feet), in patients [26.0 °C (19.7-28.0)] as compared with healthy subjects [28.6 °C (27.4-29.6) p = 0.000]. There were also significantly elevated warmth detection thresholds (WD) in feet in patients 39.5 °C (36.4-42.9) compared to healthy subjects [37.7 °C (36.1-39.4) p = 0.048]. However, there were no significant differences in QST values between patients with and without pain. Conclusions Of a total of 19 patients with verified HNPP, eight patients (42.1%) suffered from neuropathic pain, mainly in both feet. Implications Due to the high percentage of pain in HNPP, it is important not to disregard this diagnosis in a patient presenting with pain. Since there are no significant differences in QST values in patients with and without pain, routine QST studies in HNPP do not seem necessary.

Somatosensory predictors of response to pregabalin in painful chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study

Painful chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a debilitating and treatment-resistant sequela of many chemotherapeutic medications. Ligands of α2δ subunits of voltage-gated Ca channels, such as pregabalin, have shown efficacy in reducing mechanical sensitivity in animal models of neuropathic pain. In addition, some data suggest that pregabalin may be more efficacious in relieving neuropathic pain in subjects with increased sensitivity to pinprick. We hypothesized that greater mechanical sensitivity, as quantified by decreased mechanical pain threshold at the feet, would be predictive of a greater reduction in average daily pain in response to pregabalin vs placebo. In a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study, 26 patients with painful CIPN from oxaliplatin, docetaxel, or paclitaxel received 28-day treatment with pregabalin (titrated to maximum dose 600 mg per day) and placebo in crossover design. Twenty-three participants were eligible for efficacy analysis. Mechanical pain threshold was not significantly correlated with reduction in average pain (P = 0.97) or worst pain (P = 0.60) in response to pregabalin. There was no significant difference between pregabalin and placebo in reducing average daily pain (22.5% vs 10.7%, P = 0.23) or worst pain (29.2% vs 16.0%, P = 0.13) from baseline. Post hoc analysis of patients with CIPN caused by oxaliplatin (n = 18) demonstrated a larger reduction in worst pain with pregabalin than with placebo (35.4% vs 14.6%, P = 0.04). In summary, baseline mechanical pain threshold tested on dorsal feet did not meaningfully predict the analgesic response to pregabalin in painful CIPN.

Slow-gamma frequencies are optimally guarded against effects of neurodegenerative diseases and traumatic brain injuries

We introduce a computational model for the cellular level effects of firing rate filtering due to the major forms of neuronal injury, including demyelination and axonal swellings. Based upon experimental and computational observations, we posit simple phenomenological input/output rules describing spike train distortions and demonstrate that slow-gamma frequencies in the 38-41 Hz range emerge as the most robust to injury. Our signal-processing model allows us to derive firing rate filters at the cellular level for impaired neural activity with minimal assumptions. Specifically, we model eight experimentally observed spike train transformations by discrete-time filters, including those associated with increasing refractoriness and intermittent blockage. Continuous counterparts for the filters are also obtained by approximating neuronal firing rates from spike trains convolved with causal and Gaussian kernels. The proposed signal processing framework, which is robust to model parameter calibration, is an abstraction of the major cellular-level pathologies associated with neurodegenerative diseases and traumatic brain injuries that affect spike train propagation and impair neuronal network functionality. Our filters are well aligned with the spectrum of dynamic memory fields including working memory, visual consciousness, and other higher cognitive functions that operate in a frequency band that is - at a single cell level - optimally guarded against common types of pathological effects. In contrast, higher-frequency neural encoding, such as is observed with short-term memory, are susceptible to neurodegeneration and injury.

Corneal confocal microscopy as a tool for detecting diabetic polyneuropathy in a cohort with screen-detected type 2 diabetes: ADDITION-Denmark

AIMS

In this cross-sectional study, we explored the utility of corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) measures for detecting diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) and their association with clinical variables, in a cohort with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

CCM, nerve conduction studies, and assessment of symptoms and clinical deficits of DPN were undertaken in 144 participants with type 2 diabetes and 25 controls. DPN was defined according to the Toronto criteria for confirmed DPN.

RESULTS

Corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD) was lower both in participants with confirmed DPN (n = 27) and in participants without confirmed DPN (n = 117) compared with controls (P = 0.04 and P = 0.01, respectively). No differences were observed for CNFD (P = 0.98) between participants with and without DPN. There were no differences in CNFL and CNBD between groups (P = 0.06 and P = 0.29, respectively). CNFD was associated with age, height, total- and LDL cholesterol.

CONCLUSIONS

CCM could not distinguish patients with and without neuropathy, but CNFD was lower in patients with type 2 diabetes compared to controls. Age may influence the level of CCM measures.

Modeling cognitive deficits following neurodegenerative diseases and traumatic brain injuries with deep convolutional neural networks

The accurate diagnosis and assessment of neurodegenerative disease and traumatic brain injuries (TBI) remain open challenges. Both cause cognitive and functional deficits due to focal axonal swellings (FAS), but it is difficult to deliver a prognosis due to our limited ability to assess damaged neurons at a cellular level in vivo. We simulate the effects of neurodegenerative disease and TBI using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) as our model of cognition. We utilize biophysically relevant statistical data on FAS to damage the connections in CNNs in a functionally relevant way. We incorporate energy constraints on the brain by pruning the CNNs to be less over-engineered. Qualitatively, we demonstrate that damage leads to human-like mistakes. Our experiments also provide quantitative assessments of how accuracy is affected by various types and levels of damage. The deficit resulting from a fixed amount of damage greatly depends on which connections are randomly injured, providing intuition for why it is difficult to predict impairments. There is a large degree of subjectivity when it comes to interpreting cognitive deficits from complex systems such as the human brain. However, we provide important insight and a quantitative framework for disorders in which FAS are implicated.

The Potential Role of Sensory Testing, Skin Biopsy, and Functional Brain Imaging as Biomarkers in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials: IMMPACT Considerations

Valid and reliable biomarkers can play an important role in clinical trials as indicators of biological or pathogenic processes or as a signal of treatment response. Currently, there are no biomarkers for pain qualified by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or the European Medicines Agency for use in clinical trials. This article summarizes an Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials meeting in which 3 potential biomarkers were discussed for use in the development of analgesic treatments: 1) sensory testing, 2) skin punch biopsy, and 3) brain imaging. The empirical evidence supporting the use of these tests is described within the context of the 4 categories of biomarkers: 1) diagnostic, 2) prognostic, 3) predictive, and 4) pharmacodynamic. Although sensory testing, skin punch biopsy, and brain imaging are promising tools for pain in clinical trials, additional evidence is needed to further support and standardize these tests for use as biomarkers in pain clinical trials.

PERSPECTIVE

The applicability of sensory testing, skin biopsy, and brain imaging as diagnostic, prognostic, predictive, and pharmacodynamic biomarkers for use in analgesic treatment trials is considered. Evidence in support of their use and outlining problems is presented, as well as a call for further standardization and demonstrations of validity and reliability.

Reaction time impairments in decision-making networks as a diagnostic marker for traumatic brain injuries and neurological diseases

The presence of diffuse Focal Axonal Swellings (FAS) is a hallmark cellular feature in many neurological diseases and traumatic brain injury. Among other things, the FAS have a significant impact on spike-train encodings that propagate through the affected neurons, leading to compromised signal processing on a neuronal network level. This work merges, for the first time, three fields of study: (i) signal processing in excitatory-inhibitory (EI) networks of neurons via population codes, (ii) decision-making theory driven by the production of evidence from stimulus, and (iii) compromised spike-train propagation through FAS. As such, we demonstrate a mathematical architecture capable of characterizing compromised decision-making driven by cellular mechanisms. The computational model also leads to several novel predictions and diagnostics for understanding injury level and cognitive deficits, including a key finding that decision-making reaction times, rather than accuracy, are indicative of network level damage. The results have a number of translational implications, including that the level of network damage can be characterized by the reaction times in simple cognitive and motor tests.