Part 2. Identification of problems in functioning of persons with sleep disorders from the health professional perspective using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a reference: A worldwide expert survey

Frequency of Four-dimensional Oral Health Problems across Dental Fields - a Comparative Survey of Slovenian and International Dentists

OBJECTIVES

To compare the frequency of patients' oral health problems and prevention needs among Slovenian and international dentists with the aim to validate the four oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) dimensions across six clinical dental fields in all World Health Organization (WHO) regions.

METHODS

An anonymous electronic survey in the English language was designed using Qualtrics software. A probability sampling for Slovenia and a convenience sampling strategy for dentist recruitment was applied for 31 countries. Dentists engaged in six dental fields were asked to categorize their patients' oral health problems and prevention needs into the four OHRQoL dimensions (Oral Function, Orofacial Pain, Orofacial Appearance, and Psychosocial Impact). Proportions of patients' problems and prevention needs were calculated together with the significance of Slovenian and international dentists' differences based on dental fields and WHO regions.

RESULTS

Dentists (n=1,580) from 32 countries completed the survey. There were 223 Slovenian dentists (females: 68%) with a mean age (SD) of 41 (10.6) years and 1,358 international dentists (females: 51%) with a mean age (SD) of 38 (10.4). Pain-related problems and prevention needs were the most prevalent among all six dental fields reported by dentists; Slovenian (37%) and 31 countries (45%). According to Cohen, differences between Slovenia, the broader European Region, and 31 countries were considered non-significant (<0.1).

CONCLUSION

According to the dentists' responses, the frequency of patients' oral health problems and prevention needs are proportionate between Slovenia and 31 countries, regionally and globally. The four OHRQoL dimensions can be considered universal across all dental fields.

Test equating sleep scales: applying the Leunbach's model

Background

In most cases, the total scores from different instruments assessing the same construct are not directly comparable, but must be equated. In this study we aimed to illustrate a novel test equating methodology applied to sleep functions, a domain in which few score comparability studies exist.

Methods

Eight scales from two cross-sectional self-report studies were considered, and one scale was common to both studies. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) was used to establish content comparability. Direct (common persons) and indirect (common item) equating was assessed by means of Leunbach’s model, which equates the scores of two scales depending on the same person parameter, taking into account several tests of fit and the Standard Error of Equating (SEE).

Results

All items were linked to the body functions category b134 of the ICF, which corresponds to ‘Sleep functions’. The scales were classified into three sleep aspects: four scales were assessing mainly sleep disturbance, one quality of sleep, and three impact of sleep on daily life. Of 16 direct equated pairs, 15 could be equated according to Leunbach’s model, and of 12 indirect equated pairs, 8 could be equated. Raw score conversion tables between each of these 23 equated pairs are provided. The SEE was higher for indirect than for direct equating. Pairs measuring the same sleep aspect did not show better fit indices than pairs from different aspects. The instruments mapped to a higher order concept of sleep functions.

Conclusion

Leunbach’s equating model has been successfully applied to a functioning domain little explored in test equating. This novel methodology, together with the ICF, enables comparison of clinical outcomes and research results, and facilitates communication among clinicians.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-019-0768-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Mobility in persons with lower extremity amputations and influencing factors: Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health to quantify expert views

BACKGROUND:

International Classification of Function, Health and Disability provides a common framework and universal language for rehabilitation professionals across the globe.

OBJECTIVES:

To identify problems in functioning and mobility relevant to persons with lower-limb amputation from an expert's point of view and quantify these problems using the International Classification of Function, Health and Disability.

STUDY DESIGN:

Qualitative study using electronic and paper surveys.

METHODS:

Electronic or paper survey was done across six countries targeting clinicians involved in pre- and post-amputation care. Meaningful concepts were extracted from the responses and linked to suitable second-level and where applicable third-level International Classification of Function, Health and Disability categories. Categorical frequency analysis was completed for the combined data and for each location.

RESULTS:

A total of 183 experts from 6 different countries responded to the survey. A total of 2171 concepts were identified, 82% of which could be linked to a second-level International Classification of Function, Health and Disability category. The categorical frequency analysis revealed that the categories of walking, design and construction of buildings for public and private use and sensation of pain were the most frequently occurring concepts and was similar across the six countries.

CONCLUSION:

The International Classification of Function, Health and Disability can be utilised as a common framework for communication among clinicians involved in rehabilitation of persons with lower-limb amputation across the globe. The most important factors that were identified by experts in amputee rehabilitation working in different international locations were similar.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The challenges faced by the clinicians involved in care of persons with lower extremity amputation vary across different parts of the world. The overarching goal for the clinician irrespective of the location is to improve mobility and quality of life of their clients. The International Classification of Function, Health and Disability provides a common language between the various stakeholders in amputee rehabilitation across the globe.

Functioning in patients with schizophrenia: a systematic review of the literature using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a reference

PURPOSE

To identify and quantify the main concepts included in published studies focusing on individuals with schizophrenia using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

METHODS

Searches (limited to those published from 2008 to 2012) were performed in MEDLINE, PsycINFO and CINAHL. Included studies described participants with schizophrenia, were original articles and included only subjects who were at least 18 years of age at study entry. All concepts underlying the measures and the text of the articles were extracted, and they were linked to ICF categories using standardized rules.

RESULTS

From the 3584 abstracts retrieved, 348 were randomly selected, and of these, 206 studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 17,141 concepts were extracted, 84.8% of which could be linked to 491 ICF categories: 222 (45.21%) of the categories referred to Body Functions, 29 (5.91%) to Body Structures, 186 (37.88%) to Activities and Participation and 54 (11%) to Environmental Factors. Seventy second-level categories were reported in at least 5% of all studies: 30 of these categories referred to Body Functions, 2 to Body Structures, 34 to Activities and Participation and 4 to Environmental Factors.

CONCLUSION

The study has allowed us to identify and quantify the main concepts included in studies focusing on people with schizophrenia using the ICF. The majority of the concepts refer to Body Functions and Activities and Participation, rather than to Body Structures and Environmental Factors.

Child oral health from the professional perspective - a global ICF-CY survey

BACKGROUND

The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Children and Youth version (ICF-CY) (WHO) may serve as a tool for the application of holistic models of oral health.

AIM

The ICF-CY Global Oral Health Survey explored international professional opinion regarding factors relating to child oral health, including social environment, functioning, activity, and participation.

METHODS

Networking resulted in 514 professionals from 81 countries registering for a two-round Delphi survey online. Participants were pooled into 18 groups according to six WHO world regions and three professional groups. In a randomized stratification process, eight from each pool (n = 144) completed the survey. The first round consisted of eight open-ended questions. Open-expression replies were analysed for meaningful concepts and linked using established rules to the ICF-CY. In the second round, items were rated for their relevance to oral health (86% response rate).

RESULTS

A total of 86 ICF-CY items and 31 other factors were considered relevant to child oral health and function by at least 80% of professionals.

CONCLUSIONS

The ICF-CY can describe the holistic experience of oral health in children from the professional perspective. The data from this study will contribute to the development of an ICF-CY Core Set in Oral Health.

A Global Oral Health Survey of professional opinion using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

OBJECTIVES

The concept of oral health is frequently reduced to the absence of disease, despite existing conceptual models exploring the wider determinants of oral health and quality of life. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) (WHO) is designed to qualify functional, social and environmental aspects of health. This survey aimed to reach a consensual description of adult oral health, derived from the ICF using international professional opinion.

METHODS

The Global Oral Health Survey involved a two-round, online survey concerning factors related to oral health including functioning, participation and social environment. Four hundred eighty-six oral health professionals from 74 countries registered online. Professionals were pooled into 18 groups of six WHO world regions and three professional groups. In a randomised stratification process, eight professionals from each pool (n=144) completed the survey. The first round consisted of eight open-ended questions. Open expression replies were analysed for meaningful concepts and linked using established rules to the ICF. In Round 2, items were rated for their relevance to oral health (88% response rate).

RESULTS

Eighty-nine ICF items and 30 other factors were considered relevant by at least 80% of participants. International professionals reached consensus on a holistic description of oral health, which could be qualified and quantified using the ICF.

CONCLUSIONS

These results represent the first step towards developing an ICF Core Set in Oral Health, which would provide a practical tool for reporting outcome measures in clinical practice, for research and epidemiology, and for the improvement of interdisciplinary communication regarding oral health.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Professional consensus reached in this survey is the foundation stone for developing an ICF Core Set in Oral Health, allowing the holistic aspects of oral health to be qualified and quantified. This tool is necessary to widen our approach to clinical decision making, measurement of clinical outcomes, research and epidemiology.

Towards the development of an outcome instrument for spinal trauma: an international survey of spinal surgeons

STUDY DESIGN

International web-based survey.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the most relevant aspects of human function and health status from the perspective of health care professionals involved in the treatment of spinal trauma patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There is no universally accepted outcome instrument available that is specifically designed or validated for spinal trauma patients, contributing to controversies related to the optimal treatment and evaluation of many types of spinal injuries. Therefore, the AOSpine Knowledge Forum Trauma aims to develop such an instrument using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) as its basis.

METHODS

Experts from the 5 AOSpine International world regions were asked to give their opinion on the relevance of a compilation of 143 ICF categories for spinal trauma patients on a 3-point scale: "not relevant," "probably relevant," or "definitely relevant." The responses were analyzed using frequency analysis. Possible differences in responses between the 5 world regions were analyzed with the Fisher exact test and descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Of the 895 invited AOSpine International members, 150 (16.8%) participated in this study. A total of 13 (9.1%) ICF categories were identified as definitely relevant by more than 80% of the participants. Most of these categories were related to the ICF component "activities and participation" (n = 8), followed by "body functions" (n = 4), and "body structures" (n = 1). Only some minor regional differences were observed in the pattern of answers.

CONCLUSION

More than 80% of an international group of health care professionals experienced in the clinical care of adult spinal trauma patients indicated 13 of 143 ICF categories as definitely relevant to measure outcomes after spinal trauma. This study creates an evidence base to define a core set of ICF categories for outcome measurement in adult spinal trauma patients.

Toward the development of the International Classification of Functioning Core Sets for children with cerebral palsy: a global expert survey

The goal of the International Classification of Functioning is to standardize the classification of health and function of children around the world. To facilitate the application of this classification, International Classification of Functioning-based tools like the "Core Sets" are being developed. We conducted an international survey of professional experts to identify the most relevant areas of functioning in children with cerebral palsy. The questionnaire covered each component of the classification. In total, 193 professionals completed the survey (response rate 78%). Overall, 9706 answers were linked to the classification (pediatric version) by 2 professionals. From the experts' perspective, movement-related areas and social participation are the most relevant areas of functioning. Experts suggest a more comprehensive profile of functioning in particular in areas of personal capacity and social participation. The results of this survey will inform the development of the International Classification of Functioning Core Sets for children with cerebral palsy.

ICF profiling of patients with traumatic brain injury: an international professional survey

PURPOSE

A worldwide internet survey was conducted (1) to identify problems of individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) addressed by health professionals and (2) to summarize these problems using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

METHOD

A pool of professionals involved in the TBI rehabilitation process that included physicians, nurses, physical therapists, occupational therapists, social workers and psychologists were surveyed to identify problems in functioning and contextual factors of individuals with TBI using open-ended questions. All answers were translated ("linked") to the ICF based on established rules. The frequencies of the linked ICF categories were reported stratified based on context.

RESULTS

One-hundred thirty seven professionals from the six World Health Organization regions identified 5656 concepts. 92.66% could be linked to the ICF; 33.03% were related to the domain of body functions, 27.28% to activities and participation, 10.98% to structures and 21.38% to environmental factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The complexity of TBI was described through the identification of a wide variety of ICF categories. ICF language proved to be a neutral framework allowing the comparison of answers between different professionals in different world regions.

IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION

People that suffered a traumatic brain injury (TBI) may have a variety of sequelae that impair functioning. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) can help in providing information regarding the identification of patients problems and needs as well as planning, implementing and coordinating the rehabilitation process. The ICF provides a frame of reference process illustrated as the rehabilitation cycle that can help during the rehabilitation process in goal setting bringing together the clinicians' and patient's perspectives in a patient oriented biopsychosocial approach. In the field of TBI rehabilitation, activity limitations and participation restrictions are broadly affected as reported by the professionals interviewed and highly influenced by cognitive and moreover behavioral problems.