Impact of continuous positive airway pressure on glucose metabolism

Risk of diabetes in patients with sleep apnea: comparison of surgery versus CPAP in a long-term follow-up study

This study aimed to obtain a comprehensive view of the risk of developing diabetes in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and to compare this risk between patients receiving continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy versus upper airway surgery (UAS). We used local and the global-scale federated data research network TriNetX to obtain access to electronic medical records, including those for patients diagnosed with OSA, from health-care organizations (HCOs) worldwide. Using propensity score matching and the score-matched analyses of data for 5 years of follow-up, we found that patients who had undergone UAS had a lower risk of developing diabetes than those who used CPAP (risk ratio 0.415, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.349-0.493). The risk for newly diagnosed diabetes patients showed a similar pattern (hazard ratio 0.382; 95% CI 0.317-0.459). Both therapies seem to protect against diabetes (Risk 0.081 after UAS vs. 0.195 after CPAP). Analysis of the large data sets collected from HCOs in Europe and globally lead us to conclude that, in patients with OSA, UAS can prevent the development of diabetes better than CPAP.

Risk of mortality among patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea and diabetes mellitus: results from the SantOSA cohort

INTRODUCTION

Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and comorbid diabetes mellitus (DM) are reported to have an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) outcomes; however, data on CV mortality are scant.

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate if patients with comorbid OSA and DM have an increased risk of CV mortality that is higher than the two diseases in isolation.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, we included patients referred for a sleep study with and without DM at baseline. We developed four study groups as follows: group 1 (reference group), OSA (-) DM (-); group 2, OSA (-) DM (+); group 3, OSA (+) DM (-); group 4, OSA (+) DM (+). Intergroup differences were evaluated using the t test and χ² test, and multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression. The incidence rates of CV mortality were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier (log-rank) model, and adjusted HRs were calculated using the Cox regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 1447 patients were included in the analysis-group 1: 441 participants; group 2: 141 participants; group 3: 736 participants; group 4: 151 participants. The mean follow-up was 5 years. The association between OSA + DM showed an independent risk of incident CV mortality (HR 2.37, CI 1.16-4.82, p = 0.02) and an increased prevalence of coronary heart disease (OR 3.44, CI 1.73-5.59, p < 0.01). In addition, T90% was also associated with CV mortality.

CONCLUSION

The coexistence of OSA + DM was associated with an independent risk of CV mortality. In addition, T90% was also associated with CV mortality.