Is sleeve gastrectomy as effective as gastric bypass for remission of type 2 diabetes in morbidly obese patients?

Remission of Type 2 Diabetes and Sleeve Gastrectomy in Morbid Obesity: a Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has gained popularity which has resulted in a rising number of patients with T2DM to undergo this procedure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the long-term effects of SG on T2DM remission with remission seen after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or gastric banding (GB).

METHODS

A literature search was performed in PubMed and Cochrane Library using the following search terms: 'sleeve gastrectomy', 'diabetes', 'gastric bypass' and 'gastric banding'. Studies published between January 2000 and April 2018, and with following inclusion criteria were selected for this review: BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2, age ≥ 18 years, follow-up ≥ 1 year, T2DM. Data was statistically analysed using a random-effects model and results were expressed as odds ratio with 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

After exclusion, 35 out of an initial 748 studies, consisting of 18 138 T2DM patients, remained for inclusion. Of these patients, 2480 underwent a SG. The remaining patients underwent a RYGB (n = 10,597) or GB (n = 5061). One year postoperatively, SG patients reached significantly (OR 0.71, p = 0.003) less T2DM remission than RYGB. After stratifying for different criteria for remission, RYGB still tended to result in higher remission rates, but the difference was not statistically significant. Beyond 1 year of follow-up, the difference between RYGB and SG in terms of T2DM remission decreased. SG was superior to the GB (OR 2.17, p = 0.001) after 1 year of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This review demonstrates important remission of T2DM following SG. Nevertheless, as remission was significantly more often observed following RYGB surgery, the latter procedure remains the gold standard for reaching T2DM remission in patients with concurrent obesity.

Predictors of glycemic control after sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A meta-analysis, meta-regression, and systematic review

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are the most commonly performed bariatric procedures globally. However, it remains controversial which procedure provides better glycemic control. To identify predictors of glycemic control after SG versus RYGB, a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was conducted up to January 2017 for comparative studies with both SG and RYGB arms for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). A meta-analysis and systematic review was performed to evaluate glycemic control after SG versus RYGB with both short- and long-term follow-up. A meta-regression was performed to evaluate impacts of clinical indicators on glycemic control after SG versus RYGB. A total of 17 comparative studies involving 1160 patients were included. SG and RYGB achieved similar diabetic remission rates with both short- and long-term follow-up. However, SG provided lower endpoint glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) after 1-year follow-up (mean deviation = .17, 95% confidence interval .03-.31, P = .02). When adjusted by baseline A1C, SG and RYGB provided similar percent delta A1C with 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year follow-up. The baseline body mass index, duration of T2D, preoperative fasting plasma glucose, and preoperative A1C had predictive value for glycemic control after SG, but only duration of T2D and preoperative A1C were correlated with that after RYGB. These findings showed that the choice of procedure between SG and RYGB predicts no better glycemic control. However, more factors should be considered when SG is recommended to a given patient with diabetes.

The main participation of the enterohormone GLP-1 after bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Numerous hypotheses are called to explain the beneficial effect on glucose metabolism after bariatric surgery. Some authors advocate for the secretion and release of various substances with endocrine functions for the explanation on this event. One of the substances most marked as effector, with contrasting effects but controversial data, is GLP-1.

METHODS

Our study was performed in healthy male Wistar rats, to avoid the absence of confounding factors such as T2DM and obesity. In order to know the adaptation of GLP-1 secretion after surgery 5 groups were designated: two control groups (fasting and surgical stress), and three surgical groups (gastric sleeve, 50% resection of the midgut and the Roux en Y gastric bypass). After three months the GLP-1 synthesis in the different portions of the small intestine and the expression of the membrane receptors in pancreatic islet cells were studied by immunohistochemical techniques.

RESULTS

There was a significant increase in the number of secretory cells in ileum, duodenum and jejunum in mixed (RYGB) and malabsorptive (RI50) surgical groups. An elevation of pancreatic receptors signal was also observed in the same techniques versus controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that intestinal secretion of GLP-1 and its sensitivity to the pancreatic changes were increased like a response of an adaptive effect to the mechanical aggression of the digestive tube and as alteration of nutrient flow after surgery.

Predictive Value of Gut Peptides in T2D Remission: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Metabolic Gastric Bypass, Sleeve Gastrectomy and Greater Curvature Plication

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to determine the predictive value of gut hormone changes for the improvement of type 2 diabetes (T2D) following metabolic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (mRYGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG), and greater curvature plication (GCP) in a randomized controlled trial. Contradictory results have been obtained regarding the role of gastrointestinal hormones (in particular GLP-1) in beneficial metabolic bariatric surgery outcomes.

METHODS

Forty-five patients with T2D (mean BMI 39.4 ± 1.9 kg/m²) were randomly assigned to mRYGB, SG, or GCP. Anthropometric and biochemical parameters, fasting concentrations of PYY, ghrelin, glucagon, and area under the curve (AUC) of GLP-1 after a standard meal test were determined prior to and at months 1 and 12 after surgery.

RESULTS

Twelve months after surgery, total weight loss percentage was higher and HbA1c lower in the mRYGB group than in the SG and GCP groups (-35.2 ± 8.1 and 5.1 ± 0.6% vs. -27.8 ± 5.4 and 6.2 ± 0.8% vs. -20.5 ± 6.8 and 6.6 ± 1.3%; p = 0.007 and p < 0.001, respectively). Moreover, GLP-1 AUC at months 1 and 12 was greater and T2D remission was higher in mRYGB (80 vs. 53.3 vs. 20%, p < 0.001). Insulin treatment (odds ratio (OR) 0.025, p = 0.018) and the increase in GLP-1 AUC from baseline to month 1 (OR 1.021, p = 0.013) were associated with T2D remission.

CONCLUSIONS

mRYGB achieves a superior rate of weight loss and T2D remission at month 12. Enhanced GLP-1 secretion 1 month after surgery was a determinant of glucose metabolism improvement. Registration number ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ): NCT14104758.

Bariatric Surgery Among Obese Veterans: a Retrospective Review of Complications and Intermediate Term Results from a Single Institution

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the results and complications among obese veterans undergoing sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass at a low-volume center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective review of bariatric procedures performed by a single surgeon from 2009-2013. Outcomes of interest were mortality, complications, and length of stay. Weight loss and comorbidity resolution were compared between sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-y gastric bypass (RYGB). Length of stay and distance traveled to receive services were analyzed. Distributed groups were compared with Student's t test. Welch's correction was used where variances were unequal via ANOVA. Complications were compared using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients (SG = 51, RYGB = 34) were analyzed. Postoperatively, patients were seen in clinic, contacted by phone or email, and their electronic health care records were reviewed. Average length of follow-up was 114.3 weeks. Mortality was 0 %. Complication rates were comparable between groups. The percent total weight loss was 22.6 % for the SG and 27.5 % for the RYGB (p = 0.02). The percent excess weight loss was 49 % for SG and 55 % for RYGB (p = 0.149). Percent excess body mass index (BMI) loss was 54 and 61 % (p = 0.197) for SG and RYGB, respectively. Comorbidity resolution was similar between groups except for diabetes which was superior for RYGB (p = 0.03). Veterans lived an average of 141.3 miles from our VA, and all 85 patients were able to be contacted for follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite long travel distances for high-risk veterans, bariatric surgery can be performed safely even at a low-volume VA hospital with acceptable morbidity and mortality and excellent follow-up. There was no difference in morbidity or mortality between patients undergoing SG vs RYGB.

Resolution of type 2 diabetes after sleeve gastrectomy: a 2-step hypothesis

BACKGROUND

Weight loss (WL) and altered gut hormonal levels are involved in glucose homeostasis after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the time-related effects of WL, ghrelin, and glucacon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) plasma concentrations on type 2 diabetes resolution after LSG.

SETTING

University hospital, Italy.

METHODS

Ninety-one patients who underwent LSG were investigated. Insulin secretion (insulinogenic index [IGI]), insulin resistance, plasma glucose level and percentage glycated hemoglobin using the oral glucose tolerance test were assessed before surgery, on postoperative day 3, and then at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after LSG. At the same time points, WL, ghrelin, and GLP-1 levels were determined.

RESULTS

During follow-up, the resolution rate of type 2 diabetes was 9.4%, 42.3%, 71.8%, 81.2%, and 91.8%, respectively. Ghrelin plasma concentrations decreased significantly after LSG (271.5 ± 24.5 pg/mL versus 122.4 ± 23.4 pg/mL, P = .04). GLP-1 plasma concentrations increased significantly after LSG (1.7 ± 2.6 pg/mL versus 2.5 ± 3.4 pg/mL, P = .04). The percentage of excess weight loss and IGI presented a positive linear correlation (r) at all follow-up time points with a strong positive correlation at 12 and 24 months. A strong negative correlation between ghrelin and IGI was recorded during the first 3 days after LSG (r = -.9). GLP-1 and IGI presented a strong positive correlation at day 3 and 6 months (i.e., .8 and .8, respectively).

CONCLUSION

LSG may affect glucose homeostasis by 2 different time-related modes: a first step in which the hormonal changes play a predominant role in glucose homeostasis and a second step in which the percentage excess weight loss determines the metabolic results.

Effect of Resected Gastric Volume on Ghrelin and GLP-1 Plasma Levels: a Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

The correlation between resected gastric volume (RGV) and neuro-humoral changes (ghrelin and GLP-1) after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and their effects on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been evaluated.

MATERIALS

Ninety-eight patients were divided in two groups: RGV <1200 mL (group A: 53 pts) and RGV >1200 mL (group B: 45 pts). Insulin secretion (insulin area under the curve (AUC)), insulinogenic index (IGI) and insulin-resistance (homeostasis model assessment, HOMA_IR) were assessed before and after surgery (at the 3rd day and 6, 12 and 24 months after LSG) using the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). At the same time, ghrelin and GLP-1 levels were determined.

RESULTS

A significant difference in T2DM resolution rate was observed after 6, 12 and 24 months in favour of RGV >1200 mL. Group B performed better than group A at the 3rd day and at the 6th, 12th and 24th months with regard to AUC, IGI and HOMA_IR. In both groups, OGTT resulted in decreased ghrelin values and a significant increase in GLP-1 values for group B at the 3rd day and at the 6th and 12th months with no difference at the 24th month.

CONCLUSION

Ghrelin and GLP-1 changes play a role in the regulation of glucose metabolism during the 1st year after LSG. RGV influences ghrelin and GLP-1 plasma levels after LSG, with a significant improvement in the T2DM control.

The role of proximal versus distal stomach resection in the weight loss seen after vertical sleeve gastrectomy

The mechanisms involved in the weight loss seen after vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) are not clear. The rat stomach has two morphologically and functionally distinct proximal and distal parts. The rat model for VSG involves complete removal of the proximal part and 80% removal of the distal part along the greater curvature. The purpose of this study was to understand the potential independent contributions of removal of these distinct gastric sections to VSG outcomes. We prepared four surgical groups of male Long-Evans rats: VSG, sham surgery (control), selective proximal section removal (PR), and selective distal section removal (DR). Gastric emptying rate (GER) was highest after VSG compared with all other groups. However, PR, in turn, had significantly greater GER compared with both DR and sham groups. The surgery-induced weight loss followed the same pattern with VSG causing the greatest weight loss and PR having greater weight loss compared with DR and sham groups. The results were robust for rats fed regular chow or a high-fat diet. Body mass analysis revealed that the weight loss was due to the loss of fat mass, and there was no change in lean mass after the surgeries. In conclusion, removal of the proximal stomach contributes to most, but not all, of the physiological impact of VSG.

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy to Treat Morbid Obesity-Related Comorbidities: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Our aim was to compare laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for treating morbid obesity and its related comorbidities. An electronic literature search was performed from inception to May 2015 and a total of 18,455 patients, enrolled in 62 recent studies, were included in this meta-analysis. Patients receiving LRYGB had a significantly higher percentage of excess weight loss and better resolution of hypertension, dyslipidemia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and arthritis compared with those receiving LSG. LRYGB and LSG showed similar effects on type 2 diabetes mellitus and sleep apnea.

Effect of sleeve gastrectomy on type 2 diabetes as an alternative treatment modality to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Until recently, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) was the most frequently performed procedure in bariatric surgery. In the last decade, sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has emerged as a more popular, simpler, and less morbid form of bariatric surgery.

OBJECTIVES

This study compares the efficacy of SG and RYGB for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D).

SETTING

Systemic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for entries up to December 2013. Search terms included "Sleeve gastrectomy," "Gastric bypass," and "Type 2 diabetes mellitus." The chosen articles described both "Sleeve gastrectomy" and "Gastric bypass" and included over 1 year of follow-up data. Data analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.2 and SPSS version 20.

RESULTS

The data set is comprised of 3 retrospective clinical studies, 6 prospective clinical studies, and 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which involved 429 patients in the SG group and 428 patients in the RYGB group. In nonrandomized clinical studies, SG displayed similar efficacy in remission of T2D compared with the standard RYGB. In the RCTs, SG had a lower effect than that of RYGB. T2D remission was not correlated with the percent of excess weight loss for either procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the current evidence, SG has a similar effect on T2D remission as RYGB.

Amelioration of glycemic control by sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass in a lean animal model of type 2 diabetes: restoration of gut hormone profile

BACKGROUND

In obese diabetic patients, bariatric surgery has been shown to induce remission of type 2 diabetes. Along with weight loss itself, changes in gut hormone profiles after surgery play an important role in the amelioration of glycemic control. However, the potential of gastrointestinal surgery regarding diabetes remission in non-severely obese diabetic patients has yet to be defined. In the present experimental study, we explored the effect of established bariatric procedures with and without duodenal exclusion on glycemic control and gut hormone profile in a lean animal model of type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Forty 12- to 14-week-old non-obese diabetic Goto-Kakizaki (GK) rats were randomly assigned to four groups: control group (GKC), sham surgery (GKSS), sleeve gastrectomy (GKSG), and gastric bypass (GKGB). Age-matched Wistar rats served as a non-diabetic control group (WIC). Glycemic control and plasma lipids were assessed at the beginning of the observation period and 4 weeks after surgery. Fasting and mixed meal-induced plasma levels of ghrelin, glucagon-like peptide-17-36 (GLP-1), and peptide tyrosine-tyrosine (PYY) were measured.

RESULTS

In GK rats, glycemic control improved after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and gastric bypass (GB). Mixed meal-induced gut hormone profiles in Wistar rats (WIC) were significantly different from those of sham-operated or control group GK rats. After SG and GB, GK rats showed a similar postprandial decrease in ghrelin as observed in non-diabetic WIC. Following both surgical procedures, a significant meal-induced increase in PYY and GLP-1 could be demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

SG and GB induce a similar improvement in overall glycemic control in lean diabetic rodents. Meal-induced profiles of ghrelin, GLP-1, and PYY in GK rats are significantly modified by SG and GB and become similar to those of non-diabetic Wistar rats. Our data do not support the hypothesis that duodenal exclusion and early contact of food with the ileal mucosa alone explain changes in gut hormone profile in GK rats after gastrointestinal surgery.

Clinical effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIM: To assess the curative effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS: The clinical data for 81 obese patients with T2DM who received LSG at Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University from January 2010 and December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Body weight indexes, blood glucose indexes, and blood lipid indexes were measured and compared before and 1, 3, 6, 12 mo after operation. The improvement in all preoperative complications was observed.

RESULTS: LSG was successful in all cases. Postoperative complications occurred in 4 (4.9%) cases, including 3 cases of incision infection and 1 case of subphrenic infection, all of which recovered after symptomatic treatment. Body weight, body mass index (BMI), and waist and hip circumference at each postoperative time point were significantly lower than those before operation (P < 0.05). Waist to hip ratios at 3, 6, and 12 mo after operation were significant lower than that before operation (P < 0.05). All the above indexes gradually decreased over time, while excess weight loss (EWL) gradually increased over time (P < 0.05). For the blood glucose indexes, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) at each time point after operation were significantly lower than those before operation (P < 0.05), and they all gradually decreased over time (P < 0.05). Insulin sensitivity index (IAI) at each time point after operation was significantly higher than that before operation (P < 0.05), and it gradually increased over time (P < 0.05). For the blood lipid indexes, triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) at each time point after operation were significantly lower than those before operation (P < 0.05), and they gradually decreased over time (P < 0.05). High density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) at each time point after operation was significantly higher than that before operation (P < 0.05), and it gradually increased over time (P < 0.05). At 12 mo after operation, all cases complicated with irregular menstruation, degenerative joint disease and sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (SAHS) were cured or improved, only 2 (2.9%) cases of fatty liver and 1 (3.6%) case of hypertension were not improved.

CONCLUSION: LSG is a safe and effective treatment for obese patients with T2DM, which not only significantly reduces the body weight and blood glucose, and improves insulin resistance and lipid metabolism, but also has a significant effect on other preoperative complications.

Long-term effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the treatment of Chinese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with body mass index 28-35 kg/m(2)

Background

To compare long term effects of two bariatric procedures for Chinese type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 28-35 kg/m².

Methods

Sixty four T2DM patients with Glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≧ 7.0 % were randomly assigned to receive laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedure. Weight, percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), BMI, waist circumference, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose (FBG), and C-peptide were measured. Serum lipid levels were also measured during three-year postoperative follow-up visits.

Results

Fifty five patients completed the 36-month follow-up. Both groups had similar baseline anthropometric and biochemical measures. At the end point, 22 patients (78.6 %) in SG group and 23 patients (85.2 %) in RYGB group achieved complete remission of diabetes mellitus with HbA1c < 6.0 % (P = 0.525) and without taking diabetic medications, and 25 patients in each group (89.3 % vs. 92.6 %) gained successful treatment of diabetes with HbA1c≦6.5 % (P = 0.100). Change in HbA1c, FBG and C peptide were comparable in the two groups. The RYGB group had significantly greater weight loss than the SG group [percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) of 31.0 % vs. 27.1 % (P = 0.049), %EWL of 92.3 % vs. 81.9 % (P = 0.003), and change in BMI of 11.0 vs. 9.1 kg/m²(P = 0.017), respectively]. Serum lipids in each group were also greatly improved.

Conclusion

In this three-year study, SG had similar positive effects on diabetes and dyslipidemia compared to RYGB in Chinese T2DM patients with BMI of 28-35 kg/m². Longer term follow-ups and larger sample studies are needed to confirm these outcomes, however.

A meta-analysis of 2-year effect after surgery: laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity and diabetes mellitus

Literature search was performed for bariatric surgery from inception to September 2013, in which the effects of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) on body mass index (BMI), percentage of excess weight loss (EWL%), and diabetes mellitus (DM) were compared 2 years post-surgery. A total of 9,756 cases of bariatric surgery from 16 studies were analyzed. Patients receiving LRYGB had significantly lower BMI and higher EWL% compared with those receiving LSG (BMI mean difference (MD) = -1.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -1.72 to -1.03; EWL% MD = 5.06, 95% CI = 0.24 to 9.89). Improvement rate of DM was of no difference between the two types of bariatric surgeries (RR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.23). LRYGB had better long-term effect on body weight, while both LRYGB and LSG showed similar effects on DM.

Rapid Reduction in Use of Antidiabetic Medication after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: The Newfoundland and Labrador Bariatric Surgery Cohort (BaSCo) Study

BACKGROUND

Patients who have undergone bariatric surgery generally need fewer medications as they experience improvement in, or even resolution of, various medical conditions, including type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Published data on changes in medication use after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, a type of bariatric surgery that is growing in popularity, are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether patients took fewer medications for management of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, relative to preprocedure medications.

METHODS

In this prospective, single-centre cohort study, a nurse practitioner used standard medication reconciliation and study data-extraction forms to interview adult patients who had undergone laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and determine their medication use and pertinent demographic data. The data were analyzed using generalized estimating equations and standard statistical software. Outcome measures included changes in the use of antidiabetic, antihypertensive, and antilipemic medications at 1, 3, and 6 months after the surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 65 patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy between May 2011 and January 2014 met the study inclusion criteria. Before surgery, the 30 patients with type 2 diabetes were taking an average of 1.9 antidiabetic medications. One month after the procedure, 15 (50%) had discontinued all antidiabetic medications, with a further decline at 3 and 6 months (p < 0.001 at each time point). Among the patients who were taking antihypertensives (n = 48) and antilipemics (n = 33) before surgery, the decline in use occurred at a more modest rate, with 6 (12%) and 2 (6%), respectively, discontinuing these medication classes within 1 month, and 12 (25%) (p = 0.001) and 8 (24%) (p = 0.015) having discontinued by 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that patients with a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and/or dyslipidemia who undergo laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy are less likely to require disease-specific medications shortly after surgery.

Insulin resistance and beta cell function before and after sleeve gastrectomy in obese patients with impaired fasting glucose or type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes (T2D) includes insulin resistance (IR) and insufficient insulin secretion. Remission in obese patients can be achieved through surgically induced weight loss. Sleeve gastrectomy is a novel technique for the treatment of morbid obesity, and its effects on the metabolic syndrome and T2D have not yet been fully understood.

METHODS

From February 2008 to July 2010, sleeve gastrectomy as stand-alone treatment for severe or morbid obesity was performed in 23 patients with T2D or impaired fasting glucose (IFG). No postoperative complications occurred and patients were dismissed from hospital on day 2 after surgery. Body mass index (BMI), fasting blood glucose (FBG) and fasting insulin were determined before and up to 24 months after surgery. IR and beta cell function were calculated using the modified homeostasis model assessment (HOMA2).

RESULTS

BMI, FBG and fasting insulin improved significantly as early as 3 months after surgery. Threefold increased preoperative insulin resistance (3.05) decreased to near-normal values (1.14) during the same period. Interestingly, overall beta cell function diminished at 12 months of follow-up (79.6 %), in comparison with preoperative values (117.8 %). Patients with a markedly reduced preoperative beta cell function (<40 %) did not achieve a complete remission after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In obese patients with T2D and IFG, commonly characterized by an augmented beta cell function and an increased insulin resistance, sleeve gastrectomy induces remission through reduction of insulin resistance. Preoperative IR and beta cell function calculated by HOMA2 deserve further studies in patients undergoing metabolic surgery.

Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient--2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery

The development of these updated guidelines was commissioned by the AACE, TOS, and ASMBS Board of Directors and adheres to the AACE 2010 protocol for standardized production of clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Each recommendation was re-evaluated and updated based on the evidence and subjective factors per protocol. Examples of expanded topics in this update include: the roles of sleeve gastrectomy, bariatric surgery in patients with type-2 diabetes, bariatric surgery for patients with mild obesity, copper deficiency, informed consent, and behavioral issues. There are 74 recommendations (of which 56 are revised and 2 are new) in this 2013 update, compared with 164 original recommendations in 2008. There are 403 citations, of which 33 (8.2%) are EL 1, 131 (32.5%) are EL 2, 170 (42.2%) are EL 3, and 69 (17.1%) are EL 4. There is a relatively high proportion (40.4%) of strong (EL 1 and 2) studies, compared with only 16.5% in the 2008 AACE-TOS-ASMBS CPG. These updated guidelines reflect recent additions to the evidence base. Bariatric surgery remains a safe and effective intervention for select patients with obesity. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues.

Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient--2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery

The development of these updated guidelines was commissioned by the AACE, TOS, and ASMBS Board of Directors and adheres to the AACE 2010 protocol for standardized production of clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Each recommendation was re-evaluated and updated based on the evidence and subjective factors per protocol. Examples of expanded topics in this update include: the roles of sleeve gastrectomy, bariatric surgery in patients with type-2 diabetes, bariatric surgery for patients with mild obesity, copper deficiency, informed consent, and behavioral issues. There are 74 recommendations (of which 56 are revised and 2 are new) in this 2013 update, compared with 164 original recommendations in 2008. There are 403 citations, of which 33 (8.2%) are EL 1, 131 (32.5%) are EL 2, 170 (42.2%) are EL 3, and 69 (17.1%) are EL 4. There is a relatively high proportion (40.4%) of strong (EL 1 and 2) studies, compared with only 16.5% in the 2008 AACE-TOS-ASMBS CPG. These updated guidelines reflect recent additions to the evidence base. Bariatric surgery remains a safe and effective intervention for select patients with obesity. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues.

Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient--2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery

The development of these updated guidelines was commissioned by the AACE, TOS, and ASMBS Board of Directors and adheres to the AACE 2010 protocol for standardized production of clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Each recommendation was re-evaluated and updated based on the evidence and subjective factors per protocol. Examples of expanded topics in this update include: the roles of sleeve gastrectomy, bariatric surgery in patients with type-2 diabetes, bariatric surgery for patients with mild obesity, copper deficiency, informed consent, and behavioral issues. There are 74 recommendations (of which 56 are revised and 2 are new) in this 2013 update, compared with 164 original recommendations in 2008. There are 403 citations, of which 33 (8.2%) are EL 1, 131 (32.5%) are EL 2, 170 (42.2%) are EL 3, and 69 (17.1%) are EL 4. There is a relatively high proportion (40.4%) of strong (EL 1 and 2) studies, compared with only 16.5% in the 2008 AACE-TOS-ASMBS CPG. These updated guidelines reflect recent additions to the evidence base. Bariatric surgery remains a safe and effective intervention for select patients with obesity. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues.

Advances in the surgical treatment of morbid obesity

Due to the rapidly expanding prevalence of obesity, bariatric surgery is becoming an increasingly popular treatment option. Bariatric surgeries including Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) produce long-term weight loss and metabolic improvement, reducing mortality. This review discusses the important benefits and risks of RYGB and VSG, highlighting hypothesized mechanisms for these effects. We present data suggesting that VSG, albeit a newer procedure, may be as effective as RYGB with fewer adverse effects including less surgical risk, reduced nutritional deficiency, and less incidence of dumping syndrome. This may position VSG as an increasingly important procedure, particularly for the treatment of pediatric obesity.

Early resolution of type 2 diabetes seen after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and vertical sleeve gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) accounts for the majority of diagnosed cases of diabetes in adults in the United States. Many of these individuals are also morbidly obese and choose to undergo bariatric surgery to lose weight and gain glycemic control. The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has been shown to resolve diabetes before substantial weight loss occurs. Several studies suggest that the vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG), a newer bariatric operation, may result in comparable weight loss and rapid diabetes control.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of 262 patients diagnosed with diabetes who underwent either the RYGB or the VSG between 2002 and 2010. Medication usage before and after surgery was recorded. Patients who discontinued all medications postoperatively were considered "resolved" of T2D, and those who reduced the number of medications were considered as "showing improvement" in their T2D. Peri- and postoperative complications were also recorded for each operation.

RESULTS

At 8 weeks postoperatively, follow-up data were available for 38 RYGB patients and 71 VSG patients. Approximately 79% of RYGB patients and 83% of VSG patients remained off their diabetes medication. VSG patients experienced a significantly lower incidence of major and minor complications both peri- and postoperatively compared with RYGB patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Both operations appear to equally resolve T2D in an obese, adult population; however, the incidence of both major and minor complications is much lower in the VSG patient group. Therefore, the VSG should also be considered as a treatment option for obese individuals with T2D.