Sleeve gastrectomy with duodenojejunal end-to-side anastomosis in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: the initial experiences in a Chinese population with a more than 4-year follow-up

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy plus Duodenojejunal Bypass: Learning Curve Analysis and Technical Feasibility of Duodenojejunostomy Using Linear Stapler

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy plus duodenojejunal bypass (LSG-DJB) has emerged as an alternative bypass surgery. Despite its potential benefits, the technical challenges of the procedure have limited its adoption. This study aims to present the learning curve for LSG-DJB and explore potentially beneficial technical modifications for the standardization of the procedure.

METHODS

The study retrospectively analyzed 100 patients who underwent LSG-DJB as a primary procedure from July 2014 through September 2021. Baseline characteristics, weight loss outcomes, remission of metabolic diseases, and perioperative complications were assessed. The operative time was analyzed across both time trends and anastomosis type subgroups.

RESULTS

At 1-year follow-up after LSG-DJB, the mean %total weight loss and the mean BMI loss were 25.38 ± 8.58% and 9.38 ± 4.25 kg/m2, respectively. Remission rates for type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia were 72.0% (67/93), 84.1% (37/44), and 70.3% (52/74), respectively. In the analysis of operative time, the learning curve exhibited a plateau after 25 cases. The mean operative time was 136.00 ± 21.64 min in the stapled anastomosis group, and 150.62 ± 25.42 min in the hand-sewn anastomosis group.

CONCLUSION

The learning curve for LSG-DJB plateaued after 25 cases. In the LSG-DJB procedure, stapled duodenojejunal anastomosis is feasible and achieves similar outcomes to the hand-sewn method.

Mid-Long-Term Effect of Metabolic Surgery on Type 2 Diabetes in Nonobese Patients: a Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to perform a meta-analysis regarding the mid-long-term effect (≥ 2-year follow-up) of metabolic surgery on T2DM in non-obese patients.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases were searched for clinical studies from inception to March 2023. Stata 12.0 was used for data aggregation. Sensitivity, subgroup, and meta-regression analyses were performed when feasible.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 18 articles involving 548 patients. A pooled rate of 47.5% of T2DM remission was found after metabolic surgery. To be more specific, 83.5% was obtained for hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) < 7.0%, 45.1% for HbA1c < 6.5%, and 40.4% for HbA1c < 6.0%. Subgroup analysis showed that one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) had a higher remission rate (93.9%) than other surgeries. Studies conducted in America had a higher remission rate (61.4%) than in Asia (43.6%). Meta-regression analysis displayed that publication year, number of patients, study design, preoperative age, BMI, and quality assessment score were not significantly associated with T2DM remission rate. Additionally, metabolic surgery could result in significant reductions in BMI (-4.133 kg/m2), weight (-9.874 kg), HbA1c (-1.939%), fasting blood glucose, fasting C-peptide, and fasting insulin. However, metabolic surgery seemed to have poorer glycemic control in non-obese than obese T2DM patients.

CONCLUSION

A moderate mid-long-term effect of T2DM remission was observed after metabolic surgery in non-obese patients. However, we still need more prospective multi-institutional studies using the same definitions for diabetes and the same surgical technique for the surgery. Without this, the exact role of bariatric surgery in non-obese patients is unanswered.

Single-Anastomosis Duodenal Switch: Conceptual Difference between East and West

Single-anastomosis duodenal switch (SADS) has become increasingly popular. This review compared the conceptual difference between Eastern (SADS-E) and Western (SADS-W) countries. After searching for SADS through PubMed and high-impact journals, 19 articles with 2280 patients were included for analysis. We found SADS-W was reserved for patients with a high body mass index (BMI) without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Surgeons performing SADS-W used larger bougies and preferred shorter common channels. However, SADS-E was mainly preferred in T2DM patients with a low BMI. SADS-E bypassed less bowel and used smaller bougies. The spectra of major postoperative complications, nutritional deficiencies, and gastrointestinal disorders were different between SADS-E and SADS-W. SADS-W yielded better weight loss and better T2DM remission than SADS-E. SADS are effective bariatric and metabolic procedures with promising therapeutic outcomes and acceptable safety.

Single Anastomosis Duodenal-Ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy/One Anastomosis Duodenal Switch (SADI-S/OADS) IFSO Position Statement-Update 2020

PreambleThe International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) has played an integral role in educating both the metabolic surgical and the medical communities at large about the role of innovative and new surgical and or endoscopic interventions in treating adiposity-based chronic diseases. The single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy/one anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S/OADS) is a relatively new procedure that has been proposed as an alternative to the conventional duodenal switch (DS) procedure. The IFSO published a position paper on SADI-S/OADS in 2018 with which concluded that this procedure was likely to be a safe and efficacious treatment for adiposity and its related diseases. However, it noted that there was insufficient long-term data and minimal high-level evidence available. The position statement called for patients to be enrolled in long-term multidisciplinary care encouraged the registration of patients in national registries, and called for more randomized controlled trials (RCT) (Obes Surg 28:1207-16, 2018) involving the procedure. The following position statement is an update of the previous position statement. It is issued by the IFSO SADI-S/OADS task force and has been reviewed and approved by both the IFSO Scientific Committee and Executive Board. This statement is based on current clinical knowledge, expert opinion, and published peer-reviewed scientific evidence. It will be reviewed again in 2 years.

Ileal transposition rapidly improves glucose tolerance and gradually improves insulin resistance in non-obese type 2 diabetic rats

Background

Many studies have confirmed that ileal transposition can improve type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), accompanied by increased glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). We performed the experiment on diabetic rats to evaluate the effects and mechanisms of ileal transposition on the glycemic metabolism.

Methods

Twenty Goto-Kakizaki (GK) rats were randomly divided into the ileal transposition group (IT group) and the sham operation group (Sham group). Weight, food intake, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting insulin (F-ins), oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and GLP-1 were determined at baseline and 1, 4, 8, 16 and 24 weeks post-operatively. The homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index and the area under the curve (AUC) during OGTT were measured. Histological determination of the GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) was performed on the pancreas and ileum 24 weeks post-operatively.

Results

In comparison with the Sham group, the IT group showed a higher GLP-1 level and lower AUC at 4, 8, 16 and 24 weeks post-operatively (all P < 0.05) and a lower FPG, F-ins levels and HOMA-IR at 8, 16 and 24 weeks post-operatively (all P < 0.05). Compared with baseline levels, the plasma GLP-1, AUC and FPG levels decreased significantly at each post-operative time point in the IT group (all P < 0.05), but not in the Sham group (all P > 0.05); F-ins and HOMA-IR significantly decreased at 8, 16 and 24 weeks post-operatively in the IT group (all P < 0.05). GLP-1R expression in the IT group was significantly higher than that of the Sham group in both the pancreas and the ileum at 24 weeks post-operatively (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Ileal transposition ameliorated glucose metabolism without reduction in weight or food intake in GK rats, which may be induced by the increased GLP-1 expression. However, the delayed improvement of insulin resistance, accompanied by decreased plasma insulin levels, might not directly result from the increased GLP-1.