1
|
Suvarnakar A, Hose BZ, Busog DN, McCloud S, Chao GF, Miller K, Pardo I, Alimi Y. Falling short in bariatric surgery: An exploration of key barriers and motivators of attrition. Am J Surg 2024; 236:115827. [PMID: 39029267 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2024] [Revised: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the United States, obesity-related diseases pose significant healthcare challenges, with bariatric surgery offering a potential solution. However, bariatric surgery completion rates, particularly among Black and Hispanic populations, remain low. OBJECTIVE This study applied the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to explore behavioral factors influencing bariatric surgery program attrition among a majority Black participant population to inform interventions for improving attrition. METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews with 40 surgical and non-surgical participants and conducted deductive content analysis informed by six TDF constructs to explore factors influencing bariatric surgery program attrition. RESULTS Participants' decision-making regarding bariatric surgery is influenced by behavioral factors, including knowledge, skills, social roles, beliefs about capabilities, optimism, and beliefs about consequences. CONCLUSION Understanding multifaceted factors influencing bariatric surgery attrition will inform the development of tailored interventions that address knowledge gaps, enhance skills, and consider social role conflicts to improve patient engagement and decision-making in managing obesity, especially for Black populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bat-Zion Hose
- National Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health, Washington, DC, 20008, USA
| | - Deanna-Nicole Busog
- National Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health, Washington, DC, 20008, USA
| | - Summer McCloud
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Grace F Chao
- Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Kristen Miller
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA; National Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health, Washington, DC, 20008, USA
| | - Ivanesa Pardo
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA; Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Bariatric Surgery, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Yewande Alimi
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA; Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Bariatric Surgery, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA; Department of Surgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hsu JL, Ismail S, Hodges MM, Agala CB, Farrell TM. Bariatric surgery: trends in utilization, complications, conversions and revisions. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:4613-4623. [PMID: 38902405 PMCID: PMC11289040 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10985-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 06/02/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) increased in popularity after 2010 but recent data suggest it has concerning rates of gastroesophageal reflux and need for conversions. This study aims to evaluate recent trends in the utilization of bariatric procedures, associated complications, and conversions using an administrative claims database in the United States. METHODS We included adults who had bariatric procedures from 2000 to 2020 with continuous enrollment for at least 6 months in the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database. Index bariatric procedures and subsequent revisions or conversions were identified using CPT codes. Baseline comorbidities and postoperative complications were identified with ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 codes. Cumulative incidences of complications were estimated at 30-days, 6-months, and 1-year and compared with stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighted Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS We identified 349,411 bariatric procedures and 5521 conversions or revisions. The sampled SG volume appeared to begin declining in 2018 while Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) remained steady. Compared to RYGB, SG was associated with lower 1-year incidence [aHR, (95% CIs)] for 30-days readmission [0.65, (0.64-0.68)], dehydration [0.75, (0.73-0.78)], nausea or vomiting [0.70, (0.69-0.72)], dysphagia [0.55, (0.53-0.57)], and gastrointestinal hemorrhage [0.43, (0.40-0.46)]. Compared to RYGB, SG was associated with higher 1-year incidence [aHR, (95% CIs)] of esophagogastroduodenoscopy [1.13, (1.11-1.15)], heartburn [1.38, (1.28-1.49)], gastritis [4.28, (4.14-4.44)], portal vein thrombosis [3.93, (2.82-5.48)], and hernias of all types [1.36, (1.34-1.39)]. There were more conversions from SG to RYGB than re-sleeving procedures. SG had a significantly lower 1-year incidence of other non-revisional surgical interventions when compared to RYGB. CONCLUSIONS The overall volume of bariatric procedures within the claims database appeared to be declining over the last 10 years. The decreasing proportion of SG and the increasing proportion of RYGB suggest the specific complications of SG may be driving this trend. Clearly, RYGB should remain an important tool in the bariatric surgeon's armamentarium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin L Hsu
- Department of Surgery, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Mail Stop 1095, 3000 Arlington Ave, Toledo, OH, 43614, USA.
| | - Sherin Ismail
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Maggie M Hodges
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Chris B Agala
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Timothy M Farrell
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Majstorovic M, Chur-Hansen A, Andrews JM, Burke A. Factors associated with progression or non-progression to bariatric surgery in adults: A systematic review. Obes Rev 2024; 25:e13698. [PMID: 38268336 DOI: 10.1111/obr.13698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
Access to bariatric surgery is limited, and the factors related to undergoing or not undergoing the procedure are poorly understood. To this end, a systematic review of PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL was conducted to deduce the factors associated with progression or non-progression to bariatric surgery. Quantitative and qualitative English-language articles ranging in date from database conception to September 2023 were included. Eligible studies employed adult participants (18 years of age or above) who had been referred for bariatric surgery. A total of 57 studies were identified. Fifteen key factors were found, alongside six less frequently studied factors: age, sex, BMI, race and ethnicity, distance to clinic, socio-economic status, insurance coverage, physical health, psychological health, eating history and habits, substance use and smoking, social influence and relationships, pre-surgery process and requirements, surgery-related concerns, choice of surgery, and others (emergency room visitation, COVID-19 virus, health literacy, appearance perceptions, time-off work, and stigma related to surgery). No factors were found to be reliably associated with progression or non-progression to bariatric surgery; however, the nature of these findings is tentative considering methodological flaws and limited research. Further studies are required to elucidate potential inequities in bariatric surgery access and educate policymakers and health professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mia Majstorovic
- The School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Anna Chur-Hansen
- The School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jane M Andrews
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Surgery Program, The Central Adelaide Local Health Network (CALHN), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Anne Burke
- The School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Psychology Department, CALHN, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Somerset AE, Wood MH, Bonham AJ, Carlin AM, Finks J, Ghaferi AA, Varban OA. Association of program-specific variation in bariatric surgery volume for Medicaid patients and access to care: a tale of inequality? Surg Endosc 2023; 37:8570-8576. [PMID: 37872428 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10411-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although patients with lower socioeconomic status are at higher risk of obesity, bariatric surgery utilization among patients with Medicaid is low and may be due to program-specific variation in access. Our goal was to compare bariatric surgery programs by percentage of Medicaid cases and to determine if variation in distribution of patients with Medicaid could be linked to adverse outcomes. METHODS Using a state-wide bariatric-specific data registry that included 43 programs performing 97,207 cases between 2006 and 2020, we identified all patients with Medicaid insurance (n = 4780, 4.9%). Bariatric surgery programs were stratified into quartiles according to the percentage of Medicaid cases performed and we compared program-specific characteristics as well as baseline patient characteristics, risk-adjusted complication rates and wait times between top and bottom quartiles. RESULTS Program-specific distribution of Medicaid cases varied between 0.69 and 22.4%. Programs in the top quartile (n = 11) performed 18,885 cases in total, with a mean of 13% for Medicaid patients, while programs in the bottom quartile (n = 11) performed 32,447 cases in total, with a mean of 1%. Patients undergoing surgery at programs in the top quartile were more likely to be Black (20.2% vs 13.5%, p < 0.0001), have diabetes (35.1% vs 29.5%, p < 0.0001), hypertension (55.1% vs 49.6%, p < 0.0001) and hyperlipidemia (47.6% vs 45.2%, p < 0.0001). Top quartile programs also had higher complication rates (8.4% vs 6.6%, p < 0.0001), extended length of stay (5.6% vs 4.0%, p < 0.0001), Emergency Department visits (8.1% vs 6.5%, p < 0.0001) and readmissions (4.7% vs 3.9%, p < 0.0001). Median time from initial evaluation to surgery date was also significantly longer among top quartile programs (200 vs 122 days, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Bariatric surgery programs that perform a higher proportion of Medicaid cases tend to care for patients with greater disease severity who experience delays in care and also require more resource utilization. Improving bariatric surgery utilization among patients with lower socioeconomic status may benefit from insurance standardization and program-centered incentives to improve access and equitable distribution of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy E Somerset
- Department of Surgery, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University, 3990 John R, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
| | - Michael H Wood
- Department of Surgery, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University, 3990 John R, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA
| | - Aaron J Bonham
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Arthur M Carlin
- Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Jonathan Finks
- Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Amir A Ghaferi
- Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Oliver A Varban
- Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ehlers AP, Yang J, Thumma J, Howard R, O'Neill S, Arterburn D, Telem DA, Dimick JB. Comparison of safety and healthcare utilization following sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass among medicare beneficiaries using sex as a biologic variable. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2023; 19:1119-1126. [PMID: 37328408 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2023.04.332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bariatric surgery is a common operation, but differences in outcomes between males and females are unknown. OBJECTIVES To compare the risk of mortality, complications, reintervention, and healthcare utilization after sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass using sex as a biologic variable. SETTING United States. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of adults undergoing sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2018 using Medicare claims data. We performed a heterogeneity of treatment effect analysis to determine the impact of sleeve gastrectomy versus gastric bypass comparing males to females. The primary outcome was safety (mortality, complications, and reinterventions) up to 5 years after surgery. The secondary outcome was healthcare utilization (hospitalization and emergency department use). RESULTS Among 95,405 patients the majority (n = 71,348; 74.8%) were female and most (n = 57,008; 59.8%) underwent sleeve gastrectomy. For all patients, compared to gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy was associated with a lower risk of complications and reintervention but a higher risk of revision. Compared to gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy was associated with a lower risk of mortality for females (adjusted hazard ratio .86, 95% CI .75-.96) but not males. We found no difference in procedure treatment effect by sex for mortality, hospitalization, emergency department use, or overall reintervention when comparing sleeve to gastric bypass. CONCLUSIONS Females and males have similar outcomes following bariatric surgery. Females have a lower risk of complications but a higher risk of reintervention. Decisions surrounding treatment for this common procedure should be tailored to include a discussion of sex-specific differences in treatment outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne P Ehlers
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| | - Jie Yang
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jyothi Thumma
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Ryan Howard
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Sean O'Neill
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - David Arterburn
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Dana A Telem
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Justin B Dimick
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hlavin C, Sebastiani RS, Scherer RJ, Kenkre T, Bernardi K, Reed DA, Ahmed B, Courcoulas A. Barriers to Bariatric Surgery: a Mixed Methods Study Investigating Obstacles Between Clinic Contact and Surgery. Obes Surg 2023; 33:2874-2883. [PMID: 37537505 PMCID: PMC10623404 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-023-06761-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Populations most affected by obesity are not reflected in the patients who undergo bariatric surgery. Gaps in the referral system have been studied, but there is a lack of literature investigating obstacles patients encounter after first contact with bariatric surgery clinics. We aim to identify patient populations at risk for attrition during bariatric surgery evaluation and determine patient reported barriers to bariatric surgical care. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was a single institution, retrospective, mixed methods study from 2012 to 2021 comparing patients who underwent bariatric surgery to those that withdrew. Surveys were performed of patients who withdrew, collecting information on patient knowledge, expectations, and barriers. RESULTS This study included 5982 patients evaluated in bariatric surgery clinic. Those who attained bariatric surgery (38.8%) were more likely to be White (81.2 vs. 75.6%, p<0.001), married (48.5 vs. 44.1%, p=0.004), and employed full time (48.2 vs. 43.8%, p=0.01). They were less likely to live in an area with low income (37.1 vs. 40.7%, p=0.01) or poverty (poverty rate 15.8 vs. 17.4, p<0.001). Of the 280 survey respondents, fear of complications, length of insurance approval process, and wait time between evaluation and surgery were the most reported barriers. CONCLUSION Patients who undergo bariatric surgery were more likely to be White, married, employed full time, and reside in more resourced environments which is not reflective of communities most affected by obesity. The complexity of insurance coverage requirements was a major barrier to bariatric surgery and should be a focus of future healthcare reform.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Callie Hlavin
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, 200 Lothrop St, F677 Presbyterian Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, A-1305 Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
| | - Romano S Sebastiani
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3550 Terrace St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Robert J Scherer
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3550 Terrace St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Tanya Kenkre
- University of Pittsburgh Epidemiology Data Center, 4420 Bayard Street, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA
| | - Karla Bernardi
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, 200 Lothrop St, F677 Presbyterian Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Douglas A Reed
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, 200 Lothrop St, F677 Presbyterian Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Bestoun Ahmed
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, 200 Lothrop St, F677 Presbyterian Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Anita Courcoulas
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, 200 Lothrop St, F677 Presbyterian Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Paolino L, Le Fouler A, Epaud S, Bathaei S, Mokhtari N, Lazzati A. Preoperative Follow-up in Bariatric Surgery: Why They Give Up? Rate, Causes, and Economic Impact of Dropout. Obes Surg 2023; 33:2652-2657. [PMID: 37477831 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-023-06742-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative attrition is highly prevalent in patients referred for bariatric surgery. Little information is available neither on reasons reported by patients for attrition in knowledge nor costs of attrition in a publicly funded health system. OBJECTIVES To assess the reasons for the attrition of bariatric candidates and calculate its economic impact on a population with obesity in a public hospital in France. METHODS This is a retrospective study including all bariatric surgery candidates between 2014 and 2018 in our Center of Excellence in Obesity Care. Data were extracted from the hospital information system, and patient-related outcomes were collected via a standardized questionnaire. Economic analysis was performed. Primary outcome was to analyze the rate of preoperative attrition. Secondary outcome was reasons for discontinuation and their economic impact. RESULTS In total, 1360 patients were referred for bariatric surgery at our hospital, and 1225 were included in the study. Attrition rate in preoperative phase was 46.8%. Three factors were significantly associated with follow-up fragmentation risk: unemployment (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.29-0.7, p < 0.001), active smoking (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.53-5.15, p < 0.001), and body mass index (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-1.00, p = 0.036). Average cost to the healthcare system was €792 for each patient who dropped out. CONCLUSIONS We identified predictors and patient-reported factors that seem to be beyond the possibility of removal by health professionals. We should consider and address preventable factors, through the development of care pathways tailored to the individual profile of a patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Paolino
- Department of General Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, 40 avenue de Verdun, 94000, Créteil, France
| | - Adrien Le Fouler
- Department of General Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, 40 avenue de Verdun, 94000, Créteil, France.
| | - Salomé Epaud
- Kaduceo SAS, 96 Avenue Jules Julien, 31400, Toulouse, France
| | - Sarah Bathaei
- Nutrition Unit, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, 40 avenue de Verdun, 94000, Créteil, France
| | - Nawel Mokhtari
- Department of General Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, 40 avenue de Verdun, 94000, Créteil, France
| | - Andrea Lazzati
- Department of General Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, 40 avenue de Verdun, 94000, Créteil, France
- INSERM IMRB U955, Université Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chao GF, Lindquist K, Vitous CA, Tolentino DA, Delaney L, Alimi Y, Jafri SM, Telem DA. A qualitative analysis describing attrition from bariatric surgery to identify strategies for improving retention in patients who desire treatment. Surg Endosc 2023:10.1007/s00464-023-10030-z. [PMID: 37103571 PMCID: PMC10136401 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10030-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among patients who express interest in bariatric surgery, dropout rates from bariatric surgery programs are reported as high as 60%. There is a lack of understanding how we can better support patients to obtain treatment of this serious chronic disease. METHODS Semi-structured interviews with individuals who dropped out of bariatric surgery programs from three clinical sites were conducted. Transcripts were iteratively analyzed to understand patterns clustering around codes. We mapped these codes to domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) which will serve as the basis of future theory-based interventions. RESULTS Twenty patients who self-identified as 60% female and 85% as non-Hispanic White were included. The results clustered around codes of "perceptions of bariatric surgery," "reasons for not undergoing surgery," and "factors for re-considering surgery." Major drivers of attrition were burden of pre-operative workup requirements, stigma against bariatric surgery, fear of surgery, and anticipated regret. The number and time for requirements led patients to lose their initial optimism about improving health. Perceptions regarding being seen as weak for choosing bariatric surgery, fear of surgery itself, and possible regret over surgery grew as time passed. These drivers mapped to four TDF domains: environmental context and resources, social role and identity, emotion, and beliefs about consequences, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study uses the TDF to identify areas of greatest concern for patients to be used for intervention design. This is the first step in understanding how we best support patients who express interest in bariatric surgery achieve their goals and live healthier lives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace F Chao
- National Clinician Scholars Program at the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208062, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | - Kerry Lindquist
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Crystal A Vitous
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Dante A Tolentino
- School of Nursing, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lia Delaney
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Yewande Alimi
- Department of Surgery, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Sara M Jafri
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Dana A Telem
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
The role of preoperative toxicology screening in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2023; 19:187-193. [PMID: 36443215 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Some programs and insurers may require patients to undergo toxicology screening despite lack of evidence that this practice affects postoperative outcomes. OBJECTIVES To understand the prevalence of screening positive on toxicology testing in the bariatric surgical population and to examine the association between testing positive and important surgical outcomes. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass from an academic health system from 2017-2020. We described the rate of preoperative toxicology positivity as determined by serum and urine testing. We examined the association between toxicology positivity and outcomes of preoperative length, 30-day complications (bleeding, venous thromboembolism, leak, wound infection, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and myocardial infarction), readmissions, and 1-year weight loss using chi-square and t-test analysis. RESULTS Of 1057 patients, there were 134 patients (12.7%) who had positive toxicology testing. Of these, 37 (28%) were positive for opiates and 21 (16%) were positive for cotinine. Mean preoperative length was 381.8 days (standard deviation [SD], 222.5) for patients with positive testing versus 287.8 days (SD, 151.5; P = 1.00) for negative testing. Toxicology positivity was not associated with readmissions (5.2% versus 4.3%, X2 = 0.22; P = .64). The loss to follow-up at 1 year was 32.5%. There was no association with 1-year mean change in body mass index (mean of loss 12.23kg/m2 [SD, 5.61]) versus mean of loss 12.74 (SD, 6.44; P = .20)]. CONCLUSIONS Our study is the first to describe preoperative toxicology positivity rates. We found no association between toxicology positivity and preoperative length, readmissions, or weight loss. Given its lack of impact on outcomes, toxicology testing prior to bariatric surgery may be an unnecessary burden on patients and healthcare, with regard to cost and wait times.
Collapse
|
10
|
Shen MR, Jiang S, Millis MA, Bonner SN, Bonham AJ, Finks JF, Ghaferi A, Carlin A, Varban OA. Racial variation in baseline characteristics and wait times among patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:564-570. [PMID: 35508664 PMCID: PMC9633573 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09292-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for obesity and weight-related comorbid diseases, utilization rates are disproportionately low among non-white patients. We sought to understand if variation in baseline characteristics or access to care exists between white and non-white patients. METHODS Using a statewide bariatric-specific data registry, we evaluated all patients who underwent bariatric surgery between 2006 and 2020 and completed a preoperative baseline questionnaire, which included a question about self-identification of race. Patient characteristics, co-morbidities, and time from initial preoperative clinic evaluation to date of surgery were compared among racial groups. RESULTS A total of 73,141 patients met inclusion criteria with 18,741 (25.5%) self-identified as non-white. These included Black/African American (n = 11,904), Hispanic (n = 3448), Asian (n = 121), Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (n = 41), Middle Eastern (n = 164), Multiple (n = 2047) and other (n = 608). Non-white males were the least represented group, accounting for only 4% of all bariatric cases performed. Non-white patients were more likely to be younger (43.0 years vs. 46.6 years, p < 0.0001), disabled (16% vs. 11.4%, p < 0.0001) and have Medicaid (8.4% vs. 3.8%, p < 0.0001) when compared to white patients, despite having higher rates of college education (78.0% vs. 76.6, p < 0.0001). In addition, median time from initial evaluation to surgery was also longer among non-white patients (157 days vs. 127 days, p < 0.0001), despite having higher rates of patients with a body mass index above 50 kg/m2 (39.0% vs. 33.2%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Non-white patients undergoing bariatric surgery represent an extremely diverse group of patients with more socioeconomic disadvantages and longer wait times when compared to white patients despite presenting with higher rates of severe obesity. Current guidelines and referral patterns for bariatric surgery may not be equitable and need further examination when considering the management of obesity within diverse populations to reduce disparities in care-of which non-white males are particularly at risk.
Collapse
|
11
|
Gomez-Rexrode AE, Chhabra KR, Telem DA, Chao GF. Variation in pre-operative insurance requirements for bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:8358-8363. [PMID: 35513536 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09293-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients who wish to undergo bariatric surgery, variation in pre-operative insurance requirements may represent inequity across insurance plan types. We conducted a cross-sectional assessment of the variation in pre-operative insurance requirements. METHODS Original insurance policy documents for pre-operative requirements were obtained from bariatric surgery programs across the entire USA and online insurance portals. Insurance programs analyzed include commercial, Medicaid, and Medicare/TriCare plans. Poisson regression adjusting for U.S. Census region was used to evaluate variation in pre-operative requirements. Analyses were done at the insurance plan level. Our primary outcome was number of requirements required by each plan by insurance type. Our secondary outcome was number of months required to participate in medically supervised weight loss (MSWL). RESULTS Among 43 insurance plans reviewed, representing commercial (60.5%), Medicaid (25.6%), and Medicare/TriCare (14.0%) plans, the number of pre-operative requirements ranged from 1 to 8. Adjusted Poisson regression showed significant variation in pre-operative requirements across plan types with Medicaid-insured patients required to fulfill the greatest number (4.1, 95%CI 2.7 to 5.4) compared to 2.7 (95%CI 2.2 to 3.2, P = 0.028) for commercially insured patients and 2.1 (95%CI 1.1 to 3.1, P = 0.047) for Medicare/TriCare-insured patients. Medicaid-insured patients were also required to complete a greater number of months in MSWL (6.6, 95%CI 5.5 to 7.6) compared to commercially (3.8, 95%CI 2.9 to 4.8, P < .001) and Medicare/TriCare-insured patients (1.7, 95%CI 0.3 to 3.0, P = .001). CONCLUSION The greater frequency of pre-operative requirements in Medicaid plans compared to Medicare/TriCare and commercial plans demonstrates inequity across insurance types which may negatively impact access to bariatric surgery. Pre-operative insurance requirements must be reevaluated and standardized using established evidence to ensure all individuals have access to this life-saving intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karan R Chhabra
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Dana A Telem
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Grace F Chao
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Veterans Affairs, National Clinician Scholars Program, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, PO Box 208062, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gasoyan H, Soans RS, Ibrahim JK, Aaronson WE, Sarwer DB. Association between insurance-mandated precertification criteria and inpatient healthcare utilization during 1 year after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2021; 18:271-280. [PMID: 34753674 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Insurance-mandated precertification requirements are barriers to bariatric surgery. The value of their prescription, based on insurance type rather that the clinical necessity, is unclear. OBJECTIVES To determine whether there is an association between insurance-mandated precertification criteria for bariatric surgery and short-term inpatient healthcare utilization. SETTING Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council's inpatient care databases for the years 2016-2017. METHODS The study included 2717 adults who underwent bariatric surgery in Southeastern Pennsylvania in 2016. Postoperative length of stay and rehospitalizations for these individuals were followed using clinical and claims data during the first year after bariatric surgery. RESULTS The requirements for 3- to 6-month preoperative medical weight management, as well as pulmonology and cardiology examinations, were not associated with the patient length of stay, number of all-cause rehospitalizations, or number of all-cause rehospitalization days after adjusting for patient age, sex, race, ethnicity, the Elixhauser comorbidity score, type of the surgery, facility where the surgery was performed, primary payer type, and the estimated median household income. Among commercially insured individuals (n = 1499), the mean number of all-cause rehospitalizations during the study period was lower in patients with no medical weight management requirement by a factor of .57 (lower by 43.1%; 95% confidence interval, .35-.94, P = .03) and higher in patients with no requirement for preoperative cardiology and pulmonology evaluations by a factor of 2.09 (95% confidence interval 1.09-4.02, P = .03). CONCLUSION The findings suggest that the precertification requirement for preoperative medical weight management is not associated with a reduction in inpatient healthcare utilization in the first postoperative year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamlet Gasoyan
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Department of Health Services Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Rohit S Soans
- Bariatric Surgery Program, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jennifer K Ibrahim
- Department of Health Services Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - William E Aaronson
- Department of Health Services Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - David B Sarwer
- Center for Obesity Research and Education, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Varban OA. Comment on: Life during "lockdown": a cautionary tale of the impact of environment on access to bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2021; 17:1720-1721. [PMID: 34272157 PMCID: PMC8225992 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver A Varban
- Adult Bariatric Surgery Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jabour SM, Griauzde DH, Chao GF, Ehlers AP. How do Patients Access Bariatric Surgery? An Analysis of Referrals to a Large Academic Medical Center. Obes Surg 2021; 31:4662-4665. [PMID: 34296369 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05584-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M Jabour
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Dina H Griauzde
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Grace F Chao
- VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,National Clinician Scholars Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Anne P Ehlers
- Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, SPC 5343, 2210 Taubman Center, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. .,Center for Healthcare Outcomes & Policy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chao GF, Ehlers AP, Ellimoottil C, Varban OA, Dimick JB, Telem DA. Convergent Mixed Methods Exploration of Telehealth in Bariatric Surgery: Maximizing Provider Resources and Access. Obes Surg 2021; 31:1877-1881. [PMID: 33111249 PMCID: PMC7591243 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-05059-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telehealth may be an important care delivery modality in reducing dropout from bariatric surgery programs which is reported globally at approximately 50%. METHODS In this convergent mixed methods case study of a large, US healthcare system, we examine the impact of telehealth implementation in 2020 on pre-operative bariatric surgery visits and provider perspectives of telehealth use. RESULTS We find that telehealth was significantly associated with a 38% reduction in no-show rate compared with the prior year. Additionally, providers had positive experiences with regard to the appropriateness and feasibility of using telehealth in the pre-operative bariatric surgery process. CONCLUSIONS Telehealth use in the pre-operative bariatric surgery process may lead to greater efficiency in healthcare resource utilization. Insurance providers and bariatric accreditation bodies globally should consider accepting telehealth visits and self-reported weights when determining coverage decisions to ensure access for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace F. Chao
- National Clinician Scholars Program, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road Building 14, Room G100, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
- Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI USA
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
| | - Anne P. Ehlers
- Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
| | - Chad Ellimoottil
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
| | - Oliver A. Varban
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
| | - Justin B. Dimick
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
| | - Dana A. Telem
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chao GF, Ehlers AP, Telem DA. Improving obesity treatment through telemedicine: increasing access to bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2020; 17:9-11. [PMID: 33144040 PMCID: PMC7490239 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Grace F Chao
- Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan; National Clinician Scholars Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Anne P Ehlers
- Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Dana A Telem
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Iuzzolino E, Kim Y. Barriers impacting an individuals decision to undergo bariatric surgery: A systematic review. Obes Res Clin Pract 2020; 14:310-320. [DOI: 10.1016/j.orcp.2020.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Revised: 06/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
18
|
Effect of bolus enteral tube feeding on body weight in ambulatory adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes: a feasibility pilot randomized trial. Nutr Diabetes 2020; 10:22. [PMID: 32555148 PMCID: PMC7298641 DOI: 10.1038/s41387-020-0125-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Revised: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/objectives To ascertain the effect on body weight of 14 days of bolus enteral feeding with mixed meal (MM) and electrolyte solution (ES) in ambulatory adults with type 2 diabetes and obesity, and also the safety and feasibility of using a modified, intraorally anchored enteral feeding tube for this purpose. Subjects/methods We conducted a randomized, crossover pilot trial with 16 participants. A 140 cm, 8-French feeding tube was placed in the jejunum under electromagnetic guidance and anchored intraorally. Participants were randomized to self-administer 120 mL 523 kJ (125 kcal) MM, or 50 kJ (12 kcal) ES four times/day for 14 days. After ≥14 days without the tube, participants crossed over to the other treatment. The primary outcome compared weight change between treatments. Thereafter, participants could elect to undergo additional MM cycles. Participants were encouraged to continue with all usual activities including eating ad lib throughout the study. Results Ten participants withdrew prior to completing two randomized 14-day cycles (4 social, 3 intolerant of anchor, and 3 intolerant of tube). Six participants were assessed for the primary outcome and showed no significant difference in weight loss between MM and ES (p = 0.082). For the secondary outcome of within-group weight loss, average weight loss from baseline was significant for MM but not for ES: −2.40 kg (95% CI: −3.78, −1.02; p = 0.008) vs. −0.64 kg (95% CI: −2.01, 0.74; p = 0.27). A total of 23 2-week cycles were completed (12 paired, 2 unpaired, and 9 additional), with no significant adverse events for 334 days of tube use. Conclusions Repeated bolus nutrient administration via enteral feeding tube is associated with weight loss in adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes, with no significant difference seen between MM and ES feeds. The prototype device was safe, but requires development for further investigation into the effect of bolus jejunal feeding on weight and to improve acceptability.
Collapse
|
19
|
Chhabra KR, Fan Z, Chao GF, Dimick JB, Telem DA. Impact of Statewide Essential Health Benefits on Utilization of Bariatric Surgery. Obes Surg 2020; 30:374-377. [PMID: 31338734 PMCID: PMC6954295 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-019-04092-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In response to concerns about inadequate insurance coverage, bariatric surgery was included in the Affordable Care Act's essential health benefits program-requiring individual and small-group insurance plans in 23 states to cover bariatric surgery. We evaluated the impact of this policy on bariatric surgery utilization. METHODS Multiple-group interrupted time series analyses of IBM MarketScan commercial claims data from 2009 to 2016. RESULTS Bariatric surgery utilization increased in all states after ACA implementation, but this increase was no greater in states with a bariatric surgery essential health benefit. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that the essential health benefits program may have been too narrow in scope to meaningfully increase bariatric surgery utilization at the population level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karan R Chhabra
- National Clinician Scholars Program at the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 14, Room G100, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16, 016-100N-28, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Zhaohui Fan
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16, 016-100N-28, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Grace F Chao
- National Clinician Scholars Program at the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 14, Room G100, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16, 016-100N-28, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Justin B Dimick
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16, 016-100N-28, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16, 016-100N-28, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Dana A Telem
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16, 016-100N-28, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16, 016-100N-28, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gasoyan H, Halpern MT, Tajeu G, Sarwer DB. Impact of insurance plan design on bariatric surgery utilization. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2019; 15:1812-1818. [PMID: 31515131 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Revised: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bariatric surgery is underused in the United States. OBJECTIVES This study examined whether utilization of bariatric surgery is associated with payor and insurance plan type, after removing potential sociodemographic confounders. SETTING The study used Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council's data in 5 counties of Pennsylvania from 2014 to 2016. METHODS Bariatric surgery patients and eligible patients who did not undergo surgery were identified and 1:1 matched by age, sex, race, and zip code (n = 5114). A logistic regression was performed to investigate the association of payor type and insurance plan within payor type with odds of undergoing bariatric surgery. RESULTS The odds of undergoing bariatric surgery were not statistically different based on payor type. Medicare preferred provider organization plan was associated with greater odds of undergoing surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 2.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-5.04, P = .01) compared with Medicare health maintenance organization (HMO). Medicaid fee for service plan was associated with smaller odds of undergoing surgery (OR = .04, 95% CI .005-.27, P = .001) compared with Medicaid HMO. Individuals with Blue Cross preferred provider organization (OR = 2.43, 95% CI 1.83-3.24, P < .001), Blue Cross fee for service (OR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.32-2.43, P < .001), and Blue Cross HMO (OR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.39-2.46, P < .001) had greater odds of undergoing surgery compared with those with other commercial HMO plans. CONCLUSIONS Specific aspects of insurance plan design, rather than more general payor type, is more strongly associated with the utilization of bariatric surgery. Further investigations could identify which components of insurance plan design have the greatest influence on the utilization of bariatric surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamlet Gasoyan
- Department of Health Services Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Michael T Halpern
- Department of Health Services Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Gabriel Tajeu
- Department of Health Services Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - David B Sarwer
- Center for Obesity Research and Education, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sanguankeo A. Comment on: factors associated with bariatric surgery utilization among eligible candidates: who drops out? Surg Obes Relat Dis 2019; 15:668. [PMID: 30709750 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.12.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2018] [Accepted: 12/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anawin Sanguankeo
- Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|