Esophageal cancer after sleeve gastrectomy: a population-based comparative cohort study

Risk of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma After Bariatric Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Retrospective Studies

PURPOSE

This study aims to systematically review and meta-analyze the evidence on the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) following metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted on the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, and PubMed databases. Meta-analysis utilized odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to analyze the correlation between MBS and the risk of EAC. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA software (version 12.0).

RESULTS

Fourteen studies involving patients with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery and control groups receiving conventional treatment were included. The meta-analysis indicated a reduction in the overall incidence of esophageal cancer after bariatric surgery (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.51-0.95, P = 0.022). Subgroup analysis results demonstrated a decreased risk of EAC in European patients with obesity undergoing MBS treatment (OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.38-0.95, P = 0.028). In studies with a sample size greater than or equal to 100,000 patients, the risk of EAC in patients with obesity undergoing MBS was significantly lower than the non-surgery group (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.42-0.83, P = 0.003). Articles published before 2020 and those published in 2020 or earlier showed a significant difference in the incidence of EAC between the surgery and non-surgery groups (OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.43-0.75, P < 0.001). The risk of EAC in patients with obesity with a follow-up time of less than 5 years was statistically significant (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.25-0.82, P = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis results suggest a reduced risk of esophageal cancer in patients with obesity after bariatric surgery.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD 42024505177.

Incidence of cancer for patients after bariatric surgery: evidence from 33 cohort studies

BACKGROUND

With the rising prevalence of severe obesity, bariatric surgery has emerged as a crucial treatment option. As the number of surgeries performed worldwide increases, there has been growing interest in the impact of bariatric surgery on cancer incidence. While several studies have examined this relationship, the topic remains controversial.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted this systematic review of cohort studies with meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of bariatric surgery versus nonsurgical treatment on overall cancer incidence. However, the effects may vary when focusing on specific cancer types, surgical procedures, or gender, so we conducted additional subgroup analyses.

SETTING

A meta-analysis. University hospital.

METHODS

The Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies from 1 January 2000 to 1 December 2022. Meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the pooled effect and further implemented subgroup analysis stratified by cancer type, operation type, and sex.

RESULTS

All cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis from 18,216 studies. The overall cancer incidence demonstrated a significant decrease in the group with bariatric surgery (odds ratios [OR] = .56, P = .000, 95% CI .46 to .68). In subgroup analysis, similar decrease effect was found in 9 cancers. Furthermore, the incidence of cancer decreased significantly in male (OR = .66, P = .001, 95% CI .51 to .85) and female patients (OR = .63, P = .000, 95% CI .57 to .69) and patients undergoing gastric bypass (OR = .46, P = .000, 95% CI .33 to .63) or sleeve gastrectomy (OR = .44, P = .001, 95% CI .27 to .70).

CONCLUSIONS

In the overall analysis, bariatric surgery could reduce the incidence of cancer significantly. Further large-scale well-matched studies are needed to verify the protective effect of bariatric surgery on cancer incidence.

Bariatric Surgery and Longitudinal Cancer Risk: A Review

Importance

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death in the United States, with the obesity epidemic contributing to its steady increase every year. Recent cohort studies find an association between bariatric surgery and reduced longitudinal cancer risk, but with heterogeneous findings.

Observations

This review summarizes how obesity leads to an increased risk of developing cancer and synthesizes current evidence behind the potential for bariatric surgery to reduce longitudinal cancer risk. Overall, bariatric surgery appears to have the strongest and most consistent association with decreased incidence of developing breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancers. The association of bariatric surgery and the development of esophageal, gastric, liver, and pancreas cancer is heterogenous with studies showing either no association or decreased longitudinal incidences. Conversely, there have been preclinical and cohort studies implying an increased risk of developing colon and rectal cancer after bariatric surgery. A review and synthesis of the existing literature reveals epidemiologic shortcomings of cohort studies that potentially explain incongruencies observed between studies.

Conclusions and Relevance

Studies examining the association of bariatric surgery and longitudinal cancer risk remain heterogeneous and could be explained by certain epidemiologic considerations. This review provides a framework to better define subgroups of patients at higher risk of developing cancer who would potentially benefit more from bariatric surgery, as well as subgroups where more caution should be exercised.

Risk reduction of non-hormonal cancers following bariatric surgery

Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most effective intervention for weight loss leading to significant resolution of obesity-related medical conditions. Recent literature has demonstrated risk reduction of certain cancer types after MBS. Studies have shown an overall reduction in the risk of hormonal cancer, such as breast and endometrial cancer. However, the association between bariatric surgery and the incidence of various types of non-hormonal cancer such as esophageal, gastric, liver, gallbladder, colorectal, pancreatic and kidney cancer remains contested. The aim of this study was to highlight obesity and its relationship to cancer development as well as bariatric surgery and its role in cancer reduction with focus on non-hormonal cancers.

Decreased Risk of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma After Gastric Bypass Surgery in a Cohort Study From 3 Nordic Countries

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that bariatric surgery decreases the risk of esophageal and cardia adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND

Obesity is strongly associated with esophageal adenocarcinoma and moderately with cardia adenocarcinoma, but whether weight loss prevents these tumors is unknown.

METHODS

This population-based cohort study included patients with an obesity diagnosis in Sweden, Finland, or Denmark. Participants were divided into a bariatric surgery group and a nonoperated group. The incidence of esophageal and cardia adenocarcinoma (ECA) was first compared with the corresponding background population by calculating standardized incidence ratios (SIR) with 95% CIs. Second, the bariatric surgery group and the nonoperated group were compared using multivariable Cox regression, providing hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CI, adjusted for sex, age, comorbidity, calendar year, and country.

RESULTS

Among 748,932 participants with an obesity diagnosis, 91,731 underwent bariatric surgery, predominantly gastric bypass (n=70,176; 76.5%). The SIRs of ECA decreased over time after gastric bypass, from SIR=2.2 (95% CI, 0.9-4.3) after 2 to 5 years to SIR=0.6 (95% CI, <0.1-3.6) after 10 to 40 years. Gastric bypass patients were also at a decreased risk of ECA compared with nonoperated patients with obesity [adjusted HR=0.6, 95% CI, 0.4-1.0 (0.98)], with decreasing point estimates over time. Gastric bypass was followed by a strongly decreased adjusted risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (HR=0.3, 95% CI, 0.1-0.8) but not of cardia adenocarcinoma (HR=0.9, 95% CI, 0.5-1.6), when analyzed separately. There were no consistent associations between other bariatric procedures (mainly gastroplasty, gastric banding, sleeve gastrectomy, and biliopancreatic diversion) and ECA.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric bypass surgery may counteract the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma in morbidly obese individuals.

Single Anastomosis Duodenal Switch versus Classic Duodenal Switch: Long-term Outcomes from a Prospective Comparative Cohort Study

PURPOSE

The literature on long-term outcomes of duodenal switch (DS) compared to single anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S) procedures is lacking. We evaluated the long-term outcomes of SADI-S compared to those after the classic DS procedure.

METHODS

This is a follow-up report from a single-institution prospective cohort study comparing long-term outcomes of SADI-S versus DS both as one- and two-stage procedures (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02792166). Data is depicted as count (percentage) or median (interquartile range).

RESULTS

Forty-two patients underwent SADI-S, of whom 11 had it as a second-stage procedure (26%). Of 20 patients who underwent DS, twelve had it as a second-stage procedure (60%). Both groups were similar at baseline. Median follow-up times for one-stage SADI-S and DS were 57 (24) and 57 (9) months, respectively (p = 0.93). Similar BMI reductions were observed after one-stage SADI-S (16.5 kg/m2 [8.5]) and DS (18.9 kg/m2 [7.2]; p = 0.42). At median follow-up of 51 (21) and 60 (15) months after second-stage SADI-S and DS, respectively (p = 0.60), surgical procedures yielded reductions in BMI of 20.5 kg/m2 (14.0) and 24.0 kg/m2 (13.9), respectively (p = 0.52). Follow-up rates were similar for one-stage (≥ 88%; p = 0.29) and second-stage procedures (≥ 83%; p = 0.16). Similar diabetes and hypertension remissions were found (p = 0.77; P = 0.54, respectively). Despite fat-soluble vitamin deficiencies at baseline, after supplementation, they were either eliminated or less prevalent long-term after SADI-S. Daily bowel movements were also less frequent.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term weight and comorbidity outcomes after SADI-S are similar to those of DS both as one- and two-stage surgeries. SADI-S procedure may allow for similar beneficial outcomes with less burden from gastrointestinal symptoms and fat-soluble vitamin deficiencies.

Barrett's esophagus and esophageal cancer after sleeve gastrectomy. Myth or reality?

Sleeve gastrectomy has become the most performed bariatric surgery technique in the world. This bariatric technique has been related to the appearance of gastroesophageal reflux and recently with de novo Barrett's esophagus. It is not clear that this leads to an increased incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma. In this review we analyze the current scientific literature to try to answer the true incidence of Barrett's esophagus and adenocarcinoma after sleeve gastrectomy, and whether these data should make us change the indications for this technique.

Reflux and Barrett's esophagus after sleeve gastrectomy: analysis of a statewide database

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have suggested that sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is associated with the development of Barrett esophagus (BE) even in the absence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the rates of upper endoscopy and incidence of new BE diagnoses in patients undergoing SG.

SETTING

This was a claims-data study of patients who underwent SG between 2012 and 2017 while enrolled in a U.S. statewide database.

METHODS

Diagnostic claims data were used to identify pre- and postoperative rates of upper endoscopy, GERD, reflux esophagitis, and BE. Time-to-event analysis using a Kaplan-Meier approach was performed to estimate the cumulative postoperative incidence of these conditions.

RESULTS

We identified 5562 patients who underwent SG between 2012 and 2017. Of these, 1972 patients (35.5%) had at least 1 diagnostic record of upper endoscopy. The preoperative incidences of a diagnosis of GERD, esophagitis, and BE were 54.9%, 14.6%, and .9%, respectively. The predicted postoperative incidences of GERD, esophagitis, and BE, respectively, were 18%, 25.4%, and 1.6% at 2 years and 32.1%, 85.0%, and 6.4% at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large statewide database, rates of esophagogastroduodenoscopy remained low after SG, but the incidence of a new postoperative esophagitis or BE diagnosis in patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy was higher than in the general population. Patients undergoing SG may have a disproportionately high risk of developing reflux complications including BE after surgery.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Future Cancer Risk

The study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence for the prevention of future cancers following bariatric surgery. A systematic literature search of the Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed databases (2007–2023), Google Scholar and grey literature was conducted. A meta-analysis was performed using the inverse variance method and random effects model. Thirty-two studies involving patients with obesity who received bariatric surgery and control patients who were managed with conventional treatment were included. The meta-analysis suggested bariatric surgery was associated with a reduced overall incidence of cancer (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46–0.84, p < 0.002), obesity-related cancer (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39–0.90, p = 0.01) and cancer-associated mortality (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.42–0.62, p < 0.00001). In specific cancers, bariatric surgery was associated with reduction in the future incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.22–0.55, p < 0.00001), colorectal cancer (RR 0.63, CI 0.50–0.81, p = 0.0002), pancreatic cancer (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.29–0.93, p = 0.03) and gallbladder cancer (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.18–0.96, p = 0.04), as well as female specific cancers, including breast cancer (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44–0.71, p < 0.00001), endometrial cancer (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.26–0.55, p < 0.00001) and ovarian cancer (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.31–0.64, p < 0.0001). There was no significant reduction in the incidence of oesophageal, gastric, thyroid, kidney, prostate cancer or multiple myeloma after bariatric surgery as compared to patients with morbid obesity who did not have bariatric surgery. Obesity-associated carcinogenesis is closely related to metabolic syndrome; visceral adipose dysfunction; aromatase activity and detrimental cytokine, adipokine and exosomal miRNA release. Bariatric surgery results in long-term weight loss in morbidly obese patients and improves metabolic syndrome. Bariatric surgery may decrease future overall cancer incidence and mortality, including the incidence of seven obesity-related cancers.

Risk of Esophageal and Gastric Cancer After Bariatric Surgery

Importance

Bariatric surgery has been associated with a reduced risk of cancer in individuals with obesity. The association of bariatric surgery with esophageal and gastric cancer is still controversial, however.

Objective

To compare the incidence of esophageal and gastric cancer between patients with obesity who underwent bariatric surgery and those who did not (control group).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study obtained data from a national discharge database, including all surgical centers, in France from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2017. Participants included adults (aged ≥18 years) with severe obesity who underwent bariatric surgery (surgical group) or who did not (control group). Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups using nearest neighbor propensity score matching with a 1:2 ratio. The study was conducted from March 1, 2020, to June 30, 2021.

Exposures

Bariatric surgery (adjustable gastric banding, gastric bypass, and sleeve gastrectomy) vs no surgery.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome was incidence of esophageal and gastric cancer. A secondary outcome was overall in-hospital mortality.

Results

A total of 303 709 patients who underwent bariatric surgery (245 819 females [80.9%]; mean [SD] age, 40.2 [11.9] years) were matched 1:2 with 605 140 patients who did not receive surgery (500 929 females [82.8%]; mean [SD] age, 40.4 [12.5] years). After matching, the 2 groups of patients were comparable in terms of age, sex, and comorbidities (standardized mean difference [SD], 0.05 [0.11]), with some differences in body mass index. The mean follow-up time was 5.62 (2.20) years in the control group and 6.06 (2.31) years in the surgical group. A total of 337 patients had esophagogastric cancer: 83 in the surgical group and 254 in the control group. The incidence rates were 6.9 per 100 000 population per year for the control group and 4.9 per 100 000 population per year for the surgical group, resulting in an incidence rate ratio of 1.42 (95% CI, 1.11-1.82; P = .005). The hazard ratio (HR) of cancer incidence was significantly in favor of the surgical group (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.98; P = .03). Overall mortality was significantly lower in the surgical group (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.56-0.64; P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this large, nationwide cohort of patients with severe obesity, bariatric surgery was associated with a significant reduction of esophageal and gastric cancer incidence and overall in-hospital mortality, which suggests that bariatric surgery can be performed as treatment for severe obesity without increasing the risk of esophageal and gastric cancer.

Obesity, sleeve gastrectomy and gastro-esophageal reflux disease

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most frequently performed operation for morbid obesity in the world. In spite of its demonstrated efficacy, the Achilles' Heel of this procedure seems to be either pre-existing or de novo gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) with its potential complications such as peptic esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus and, in the long-term, esophageal adenocarcinoma. According to factual literature, it appears clear that Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the preferred choice in case of pre-existing GERD or hiatal hernia discovered during preoperative workup for bariatric surgery. Nonetheless, certain authors propose performance of SG with an associated antireflux procedure such as Nissen fundoplication. Strict endoscopic surveillance is recommended after bariatric surgery. Revisional surgery (conversion of SG into Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)) is the treatment of choice for patients who develop GERD after SG when conservative treatment (modified lifestyle and proton pump inhibitors) has failed. Lastly, with regard to the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma after SG, large scale studies with adequate follow-up are necessary to come to factual conclusions. In all cases, the management of this conundrum remains a major technical challenge that has to be taken in consideration in future years, especially because of the current expansion of bariatric surgery.

Risk of non-hormonal cancer after bariatric surgery: meta-analysis of retrospective observational studies

BACKGROUND

Obesity is associated with an increased incidence of at least 13 types of cancer. Although bariatric surgery has been associated with a reduced risk of hormonal cancers, data for non-hormonal cancers are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of bariatric surgery on the incidence of non-hormonal cancers.

METHODS

Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for articles between 1984 and 2018, following the PRISMA system. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effect model with subgroup analysis by procedure and cancer type.

RESULTS

From 2526 studies screened, 15 were included. There were a total of 18 583 477 patients, 947 787 in the bariatric group and 17 635 690 in the control group. In comparison to the non-surgical group, the bariatric group had a lower incidence of cancer (OR .65 (95 per cent c.i. 0.53 to 0.80); P < 0.002). In the subgroup analysis, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy were associated with decreased risk of developing cancer, while no difference was observed with adjustable gastric banding. When evaluated by cancer type, liver (OR 0.417 (95 per cent c.i. 0.323 to 0.538)), colorectal (OR 0.64 (95 per cent c.i. 0.49 to 0.84)), kidney and urinary tract cancer (OR 0.77 (95 per cent c.i. 0.72 to 0.83)), oesophageal (OR 0.60 (95 per cent c.i. 0.43 to 0.85)), and lung cancer (OR 0.796 (95 per cent c.i. 0.45 to 0.80)) also presented a lower cancer incidence in the bariatric group.

CONCLUSION

Bariatric surgery is related to an almost 50 per cent reduction in the risk of non-hormonal cancers.

[Obesity from the Perspective of Surgical Oncology]

Up to 40% of all adults worldwide are overweight or obese. Besides the established obesity-related comorbidities, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension or NAFLD (non-alcoholic fatty liver disease), the focus of interest is shifting towards the influence of increased body weight as a risk factor for the development of malignant diseases. For more than 20 different types of malignancies, interactions between increased body weight and cancer risk have been established. Pathophysiological influences of obesity on carcinogenesis are diverse, including factors such as chronic inflammation, hyperinsulinaemia and insulin resistance, various changes in growth factor and changes in sex hormones. In cohorts of visceral oncology patients, malignancies such as colorectal carcinomas, hepatocellular carcinomas, adenocarcinomas of the pancreas, oesophageal and gastric carcinomas are also linked to an increased disease risk with increasing body weight. Since obesity must be considered a preventable or at least treatable cause of cancer, this review examines the influence of obesity in the field of visceral oncology, examining the effects of obesity on tumour prevalence, prevention and diagnostic testing, as well as its influence on treatment and prognosis. Furthermore, this review explores the current evidence on the influence of bariatric surgery on the prevalence of these obesity associated tumours. For example, in the case of colorectal carcinomas, the evidence base following bariatric surgery is mixed, painting an inhomogeneous picture. On the other hand, significantly lower prevalence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinomas is to be noted. The latter effect can be explained by the decrease in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) associated with weight loss. Despite the justified concern that bariatric procedures (especially gastric sleeve resection) lead to increased prevalence of malignancies of the oesophageal junction, the currently available epidemiological data does not seem to identify a relevant increase in the incidence of these malignancies.

Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer After Bariatric Surgery: an Up-to-Date Systematic Scoping Review of Literature of 324 Cases

BACKGROUND

This review aimed to give an updated overview of the occurrence, diagnosis, treatment and outcome of oesophageal and gastric cancer after bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS).

METHODS

Two searches were done (one for original studies and one for systematic reviews) using an adapted form of "scoping review methodology". MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Pubmed and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies on patients with either oesophageal or gastric cancer after BMS.

RESULTS

A total of 52 unique studies were included which reported on 324 patients, which included 110 (34%) males and 136 (42%) females. In the remaining 78 patients, gender was not specified. A mean of 62.95 ± 32.75 months was the time from BMS to diagnosis of cancer. Most of the patients had a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) as index bariatric surgical procedure, followed by gastric banding (GB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (respectively, 133 (41.0%) RYGB, 97 (30.0%) GB and 58 (18.0%) SG). Seven cases have been reported after OAGB-MGB (3 in gastric remnant, 4 in oesophagus/gastric pouch). Seventy-seven (24%) had distant metastasis (≥ M1/Mx status). The majority of tumours were adenocarcinoma (n = 208, 87.4%). In the majority of the cases, a surgical approach was preferred with either adjuvant chemo or radiotherapy. In the course of the disease, 122 of 324 patients died (37.8%).

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the most up-to-date review addressing oesophageal and gastric malignancies after bariatric surgery. Future research should focus to optimise screening for oesophageal and gastric cancer after bariatric surgery.

Revision Bariatric Procedures and Management of Complications from Bariatric Surgery

Bariatric surgery is effective, but may be associated with adverse events. A multi-disciplinary approach including endoscopic interventions can be effective to manage these. Endoscopists should familiarize themselves with gastrointestinal pathology which can occur after bariatric surgery, including nutritional deficiencies, acid reflux, anastomotic stenosis, gallstone disease, leaks, fistulas, and weight regain. Endoscopic interventions including anastomotic stricture dilation, control of bleeding, endoscopic ultrasound-guided approach for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, leak or fistula closure via endoscopic suturing or stent placement, and transoral outlet reduction (TORe) or revision obesity surgery endoluminal (ROSE) to address weight regain are among the endoscopic tools which have demonstrated safety and efficacy in the management of adverse events after bariatric surgery.

Effect of bariatric surgery on cancer risk: results from an emulated target trial using population-based data

BACKGROUND

The impact of weight loss induced by bariatric surgery on cancer occurrence is controversial. To study the causal effect of bariatric surgery on cancer risk from an observational database, a target-trial emulation technique was used to mimic an RCT.

METHODS

Data on patients admitted between 2010 and 2019 with a diagnosis of obesity were extracted from a national hospital discharge database. Criteria for inclusion included eligibility criteria for bariatric surgery and the absence of cancer in the 2 years following inclusion. The intervention arms were bariatric surgery versus no surgery. Outcomes were the occurrence of any cancer and obesity-related cancer; cancers not related to obesity were used as negative controls.

RESULTS

A total of 1 140 347 patients eligible for bariatric surgery were included in the study. Some 288 604 patients (25.3 per cent) underwent bariatric surgery. A total of 48 411 cancers were identified, including 4483 in surgical patients and 43 928 among patients who did not receive bariatric surgery. Bariatric surgery was associated with a decrease in the risk of obesity-related cancer (hazard ratio (HR) 0.89, 95 per cent c.i. 0.83 to 0.95), whereas no significant effect of surgery was identified with regard to cancers not related to obesity (HR 0.96, 0.91 to 1.01).

CONCLUSION

When emulating a target trial from observational data, a reduction of 11 per cent in obesity-related cancer was found after bariatric surgery.

Esophageal and gastric malignancies after bariatric surgery: a retrospective global study

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery can influence the presentation, diagnosis, and management of gastrointestinal cancers. Esophagogastric (EG) malignancies in patients who have had a prior bariatric procedure have not been fully characterized.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize EG malignancies after bariatric procedures.

SETTING

University Hospital, United Kingdom.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, multicenter observational study of patients with EG malignancies after bariatric surgery to characterize this condition.

RESULTS

This study includes 170 patients from 75 centers in 25 countries who underwent bariatric procedures between 1985 and 2020. At the time of the bariatric procedure, the mean age was 50.2 ± 10 years, and the mean weight 128.8 ± 28.9 kg. Women composed 57.3% (n = 98) of the population. Most (n = 64) patients underwent a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) followed by adjustable gastric band (AGB; n = 46) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG; n = 43). Time to cancer diagnosis after bariatric surgery was 9.5 ± 7.4 years, and mean weight at diagnosis was 87.4 ± 21.9 kg. The time lag was 5.9 ± 4.1 years after SG compared to 9.4 ± 7.1 years after RYGB and 10.5 ± 5.7 years after AGB. One third of patients presented with metastatic disease. The majority of tumors were adenocarcinoma (82.9%). Approximately 1 in 5 patients underwent palliative treatment from the outset. Time from diagnosis to mortality was under 1 year for most patients who died over the intervening period.

CONCLUSION

The Oesophago-Gastric Malignancies After Obesity/Bariatric Surgery study presents the largest series to date of patients developing EG malignancies after bariatric surgery and attempts to characterize this condition.

Reflux, Barrett's Esophagus, and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma After Bariatric Surgery

We present the case of a patient who developed esophageal adenocarcinoma after a previous laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Bariatric surgery has emerged as the most effective treatment option for weight loss and obesity-related diseases; however, sleeve gastrectomy promotes gastroesophageal reflux and leads to Barrett's esophagus in a substantial portion of patients. The natural history of Barrett's esophagus in these patients is unknown, and active surveillance is recommended until the incidence of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in this population is clarified. Management options for these patients include conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Although esophagectomy in patients who have previously undergone sleeve gastrectomy may require an alternative conduit, the remnant stomach can be used in carefully selected patients. Here, we review the different weight loss procedures, their effect on gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus, and the treatment options for patients with esophageal cancer after sleeve gastrectomy. We report the use of preoperative coil embolization as a means of vascular preconditioning before successful use of a gastric conduit.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Outcomes After Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Bypass

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to assess whether vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) increases the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), esophagitis and Barrett esophagus (BE) relative to patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in patients with and without preoperative GERD.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Concerns for potentiation of GERD, supported by multiple high-quality retrospective studies, have hindered greater adoption of the VSG.

METHODS

From the OptumLabs Data Warehouse, VSG and RYGB patients with ≥2 years enrollment were identified and matched by follow-up time. GERD [reflux esophagitis, prescription for acid reducing medication (Rx) and/or diagnosis of BE], upper endoscopy (UE), and re-admissions were evaluated beyond 90 days.

RESULTS

A total of 8362 patients undergoing VSG were matched 1:1 to patients undergoing RYGB, on the basis of post-operative follow-up interval. Age, sex, and follow-up time were similar between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Among all patients, postoperative GERD was more frequently observed in VSG patients relative to RYGB patients (60.2% vs 55.6%, respectively; P < 0.001), whereas BE was more prevalent in RYGB patients (0.7% vs 1.1%; P = 0.007). Postoperatively, de novo esophageal reflux symptomatology was more common in VSG patients (39.3% vs 35.3%; P < 0.001), although there was no difference in development of the histologic diagnoses reflux esophagitis and BE. Furthermore, postoperative re-admission was higher in the RYGB cohort (38.9% vs 28.9%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to RYGB, VSG may not have inferior long-term GERD outcomes, while also leading to fewer re-hospitalizations. These data challenge the prevailing opinion that patients with GERD should undergo RYGB instead of VSG.

Esophageal Cancer After Bariatric Surgery: Increasing Prevalence and Treatment Strategies

Purpose

The number of bariatric procedures has increased exponentially over the last 20 years. On the background of ever-increasing incidence of esophageal malignancies, the altered anatomy after bariatric surgery poses challenges in treatment of these cancers. In this study, an epidemiological estimate is presented for the future magnitude of this problem and treatment options are described in a retrospective multicenter cohort.

Methods

The number of bariatric procedures, esophageal cancer incidence, and mortality rates of the general population were used for epidemiological estimates. A retrospective multicenter cohort was composed; patients were treated in three large oncological centers with a high upper gastrointestinal cancer caseload. Consecutive patients with preceding bariatric surgery who developed esophageal cancer between 2014 and 2019 were included.

Results

Approximately 3200 out of 6.4 million post bariatric surgery patients are estimated to have developed esophageal cancer between 1998 and 2018 worldwide. In a multicenter cohort, 15 patients with esophageal cancer or Barrett’s esophagus and preceding bariatric surgery were identified. The majority of patients had a history of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (46.7%) and had an adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus (60%). Seven patients received curative surgical treatment, five of whom are still alive at last follow-up (median follow-up 2 years, no loss to follow-up).

Conclusion

Based on worldwide data, esophageal cancer development following bariatric surgery has increased over the past decades. Treatment of patients with esophageal cancer after bariatric surgery is challenging and requires a highly individualized approach in which optimal treatment and anatomical limitations are carefully balanced.

Graphical abstract

Serum MMP-9 and SAA in the Diagnosis of Severe Pneumonia Caused by Radiotherapy of Esophageal Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To explore the relationship and diagnostic value of serum MMP-9 and SAA in severe pneumonia (sCAP) caused by radiotherapy of esophageal cancer.

METHODS

A total of 144 esophageal cancer patients who underwent radiotherapy in our hospital from April 2016 to February 2018 were collected. Among them, 58 patients without radiation pneumonitis (RP) were in the control group, 49 patients with grade 1∼2 RP were in the radiation group, and 37 patients with sCAP were in the severe group. The levels of serum MMP-9 and SAA in every group of patients were detected. The ROC curve was used to determine the diagnostic value of serum MMP-9 and SAA in the diagnosis of RP and sCAP. The correlation between serum MMP-9 and SAA and the patient's lung function indexes was analyzed, and the logistic single-factor and multivariate analyses were performed to analyze the factors of sCAP in esophageal cancer radiotherapy.

RESULTS

PaO2, FVC, and FEV1 decreased in RP and sCAP, and PaCO2, white blood cells, serum MMP-9, and SAA levels increased (P < 0.05); serum MMP-9 and SAA were negatively correlated with lung function (P < 0.05); the AUC of serum MMP-9 and SAA in RP was 0.833 and 0.823, respectively, and the AUC of the two combined diagnosis of RP was 0.919. The AUC of serum MMP-9 and SAA in sCAP was 0.809 and 0.797, respectively, and the AUC of both combined diagnosis of sCAP was 0.873; logistics multivariate analysis found that serum MMP-9, serum SAA, double lung V5, and V20 were independent risk factors for sCAP caused by radiotherapy for esophageal cancer (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Serum MMP-9 and SAA increase in RP and sCAP and are negatively correlated with lung function in patients with pneumonia. They are independent risk factors for severe pneumonia caused by radiotherapy of esophageal cancer and have good diagnostic value.