Auricular nerve stimulation using the NSS-2 BRIDGE device to reduce opioid requirement following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Percutaneous auricular neuromodulation (nerve stimulation) for the treatment of pain following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled pilot study

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous auricular nerve stimulation (neuromodulation) is an analgesic technique involving the percutaneous implantation of multiple leads at various points on/around the ear followed by the delivery of electric current using an external pulse generator. A device is currently available within the USA cleared to treat symptoms from opioid withdrawal, and multiple reports suggest a possible postoperative analgesic effect. The current randomized, controlled pilot study was undertaken to (1) determine the feasibility and optimize the protocol for a subsequent definitive clinical trial and (2) estimate the treatment effect of auricular neuromodulation on postoperative pain and opioid consumption following total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

Within the recovery room following primary, unilateral, total knee arthroplasty, an auricular neuromodulation device (NSS-2 Bridge, Masimo, Irvine, California, USA) was applied using three percutaneous leads and one ground electrode. Participants were randomized to 5 days of either electrical stimulation or sham stimulation in a double-masked fashion. Participants were discharged with the stimulator in situ and removed the disposable devices at home. The dual primary treatment effect outcome measures were the cumulative opioid use (oral oxycodone) and the mean of the "average" daily pain measured with the Numeric Rating Scale for the first 5 postoperative days.

RESULTS

During the first five postoperative days, oxycodone consumption in participants given active stimulation (n=15) was a median (IQR) of 4 mg (2-12) vs 13 mg (5-23) in patients given sham (n=15) treatment (p=0.039). During this same period, the average pain intensity in patients given active stimulation was a median (IQR) of 2.5 (1.5-3.3) vs 4.0 (3.6-4.8) in those given sham (p=0.014). Awakenings due to pain over all eight postoperative nights in participants given active stimulation was a median (IQR) of 5 (3-8) vs 11 (4-14) in those given sham (p<0.001). No device-related localized cutaneous irritation, systemic side effects, or other adverse events were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous auricular neuromodulation reduced pain scores and opioid requirements during the initial week after total knee arthroplasty. Given the ease of application as well as the lack of systemic side effects and reported complications, a definitive clinical trial appears warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05521516.

Clinical Efficacy of Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Chronic and Acute Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Current guidelines for pain treatment recommend a personalized, multimodal and interdisciplinary approach as well as the use of a combination of drug and non-drug therapies. Risk factors for chronification should already be reduced in patients with acute pain, e.g., after surgery or trauma. Auricular vagus nerve stimulation (aVNS) could be an effective non-drug therapy in the multimodal treatment of chronic and acute pain. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of aVNS in treating chronic and acute pain conditions.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed regarding the application of auricular electrical stimulation in chronic and acute pain. Studies were classified according to their level of evidence (Jadad scale), scientific validity and risk of bias (RoB 2 tool) and analyzed regarding indication, method, stimulation parameters, duration of treatment and efficacy and safety. A meta-analysis on (randomized) controlled trials (using different comparators) was performed for chronic and acute pain conditions, respectively, including subgroup analysis for percutaneous (pVNS-needle electrodes) and transcutaneous (tVNS-surface electrodes) aVNS. The visual analog pain scale (VAS) was defined as primary efficacy endpoint.

RESULTS

A total of n = 1496 patients were treated with aVNS in 23 identified and analyzed studies in chronic pain, 12 studies in acute postoperative pain and 7 studies in experimental acute pain. Of these, seven studies for chronic pain and six studies for acute postoperative pain were included in the meta-analysis. In chronic pain conditions, including back pain, migraine and abdominal pain, a statistically significant reduction in VAS pain intensity for active compared to sham aVNS or control treatment with an effect size Hedges' g/mean difference of - 1.95 (95% confidence interval [CI]: - 3.94 to 0.04, p = 0.008) could be shown and a more favorable effect in pVNS compared to tVNS (- 5.40 [- 8.94; - 1.85] vs. - 1.00 [- 1.55; - 0.44]; p = 0.015). In acute pain conditions, single studies showed significant improvements with aVNS, e.g., in kidney donor surgery or tonsillectomy but, overall, a non-statistically significant reduction in VAS pain intensity for active compared to sham aVNS or control with - 0.70 [- 2.34; 0.93] (p = 0.15) could be observed in the meta-analysis. In acute pain results vary greatly between studies depending especially on co-medication and timepoints of assessment after surgery. A significant reduction in analgesics or opiate intake was documented in most studies evaluating this effect in chronic and acute pain. In 3 of the 12 randomized controlled trials in patients with chronic pain, a sustainable pain reduction over a period of up to 12 months was shown. Overall, aVNS was very well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that aVNS can be an effective and safe non-drug treatment in patients with specific chronic and acute postoperative pain conditions. Further research is needed to identify the influence of simulation parameters and find optimal and standardized treatment protocols while considering quality-of-life outcome parameters and prolonged follow-up periods. A more standardized approach and harmonization in study designs would improve comparability and robustness of outcomes.

[Clinical efficacy of auricular vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of chronic and acute pain : A systematic review]

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend a personalized, multimodal, and interdisciplinary approach for the treatment of chronic pain. Already in the acute treatment of postoperative pain, it can be useful to minimize risk factors for chronification. Auricular vagus nerve stimulation (aVNS) could be an effective non-drug therapy for the treatment of chronic and acute pain.

AIM OF THE WORK

The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of aVNS in chronic and acute pain as well as its effect on medication intake.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was carried out on the application of auricular electrical stimulation in chronic and acute pain. Studies were classified according to their level of evidence and evaluated via the Jadad scale as well as their scientific validity, and then analyzed in terms of indication, method, stimulation parameters, duration of treatment, efficacy, and safety.

RESULTS

Twenty studies on chronic pain indications, ten studies on acute postoperative pain, as well as seven studies on experimental acute pain were identified and analyzed. The search revealed a total of n = 1105 aVNS-treated patients. The best evidence on the efficacy of aVNS is available for the indications chronic low back pain, chronic cervical syndrome, chronic abdominal pain, and chronic migraine as well as acute postoperative pain in oocyte aspiration, laparoscopic nephrectomy, and open colorectal surgery. Additionally a significant reduction in analgesic or opiate intake was evident in most studies. In three randomized controlled trials in chronic pain patients, a sustainable pain reduction over a period of up to 12 months was shown. Overall, aVNS was very well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

This review indicates that aVNS can be a complementary and effective non-drug treatment for patients with chronic and acute postoperative pain. Future studies in these indications should focus on standardizing and optimizing treatment parameters, inclusion of quality-of-life outcome parameters, and longer follow-up periods to better understand the sustainable therapeutic effect of aVNS.

Reduction of Pain After Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery by Personalized Checkpoint Acupuncture-Data of a STRICTA Conform Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

It remains challenging in clinical practice to perform optimal pain management following bariatric surgeries. Acupuncture (AC) is an effective method of postoperative pain management, but its clinical efficacy depends on the rationale used to select AC points.

METHODS

We developed a method to identify individual patterns of pain and a corresponding set of acupoints (corrAC) based on the relative pressure sensitivity of six abdominal visceral pressure points, i.e., the gastrointestinal (GI) checkpoints (G1-G6). Patients with moderate to severe pain were included and received a single AC treatment following surgery. The visual analog scale (VAS) score, pain threshold, and skin temperature were assessed before AC and at 5 min, 1 h, and 24 h following AC. AC was performed with 1-mm-deep permanent needles.

RESULTS

From April 2021 to March 2022, 72 patients were included in the analysis. Fifty-nine patients received corrAC, whereas 13 received a noncorresponding AC (nonAC) as an internal control. Patients receiving corrAC showed a significant reduction (74%) in pain at 5 min after treatment (p < 0.0001) and a significant increase (37%) in the pain threshold (p < 0.0001). In this group, a significant increase in skin temperature above G1, G3, G4, and G5 was observed. Patients receiving nonAC showed neither significant pain reduction nor significant changes in pain threshold. The skin above G3 and G4 did not reveal temperature changes.

CONCLUSION

Checkpoint AC may be an effective tool in postoperative pain therapy after bariatric surgery. Vegetative functional involvement might be associated with pain relief.

Iteration is not solving the opioid crisis, it's time for transformation

Opioid use disorder (OUD) produces exceedingly high rates of morbidity and mortality in the United States and throughout the world. Almost 90% of persons qualifying for treatment do not enter treatment and 72% of those who initiate treatment leave within 60 days. This Perspective posits that over the past decade our OUD treatment system has produced only small iterative gains in treatment access because, in part, it is founded in a series of top-down regulatory policies dating back more than 100 years. These policies prioritized restricting persons with OUD from having access to opioid agonists over empirical discovery of treatment best practice. It further suggests that for persons who are not already responding positively to our existing treatments, we may need to fundamentally transform care to enact true, meaningful change. Four potential considerations are outlined: expanding beyond long-acting opioids for treatment, embracing safe use as a viable therapeutic target, ending closed medication distribution systems, and partnering with our patients. The overarching aim of this discussion is to motivate broader thinking about new solutions for the patients for whom the existing strategies are not working and who may benefit from more transformative approaches. Though efforts to-date to expand existing treatment systems and find new ways to promote existing MOUDs have been important, these efforts have represented iterative changes. For us to meet our goal of substantially reducing opioid-related harms, it may be time to consider strategies that represent true transformation.

Percutaneous Auricular Nerve Stimulation (Neuromodulation) for Analgesia and Opioid-Sparing Following Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Proof-of-Concept Case Series

We present a case series to demonstrate proof-of-concept for the off-label use of an auricular neuromodulation device-originally developed to treat symptoms associated with opioid withdrawal-to instead provide analgesia and opioid-sparing following knee and hip arthroplasties. Within the recovery room, an auricular neuromodulation device (near-field stimulator system 2 [NSS-2] Bridge, Masimo) was applied to 5 patients. Average daily pain at rest and while moving was a median of 0 to 2 as measured on the 0 to 10 numeric rating scale, while median daily oxycodone use was 0 to 2.5 mg until device removal at home on postoperative day 5. One patient avoided opioid use entirely.

Percutaneous auricular nerve stimulation (neuromodulation) for the treatment of pain following outpatient surgery: a proof-of-concept case series

BACKGROUND

Following outpatient surgery, it is often difficult to provide adequate analgesia while concurrently minimizing opioid requirements. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation has been proposed as an analgesic, but requires physician-level skills, advanced equipment, up to an hour to administer, and is frequently cost prohibitive. In contrast, percutaneous auricular neuromodulation may be placed by nursing staff in a few minutes without additional equipment, theoretically provides analgesia for nearly any anatomic location, lacks systemic side effects, and has no significant risks. We now present a case report to demonstrate proof of concept for the off-label use of an auricular neuromodulation device-originally developed to treat symptoms associated with opioid withdrawal-to instead provide analgesia following outpatient surgery.

CASE PRESENTATION

Following moderately painful ambulatory orthopedic and breast surgery, seven patients had an auricular neuromodulation device (NSS-2 Bridge, Masimo, Irvine, California, USA) affixed within the recovery room in approximately 5 min and discharged home. Average resting and dynamic pain scores measured on the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale were a median of 1 over the first 2 days, subsequently falling to 0. Five patients avoided opioid use entirely, while the remaining two each consumed 5 mg of oxycodone during the first 1-2 postoperative days. After 5 days, the devices were removed at home and discarded.

CONCLUSIONS

These cases demonstrate that ambulatory percutaneous auricular neuromodulation is feasible and may be an effective analgesic and decreasing or even negating opioid requirements following outpatient surgery. Considering the lack of systemic side effects, serious adverse events, and misuse/dependence/diversion potential, further study with a randomized, controlled trial appears warranted.

Percutaneous Auricular Nerve Stimulation (Neuromodulation) for the Treatment of Pain: A Proof-of-Concept Case Report using Total Joint Arthroplasty as a Surrogate for Battlefield Trauma

In 2 cases we show that ambulatory percutaneous auricular nerve stimulation is feasible after joint arthroplasty. This off-label use appears to have markedly reduced pain and opioid use free of systemic side effects. It is thus a possible analgesic for use on the battlefield.

There are few effective pain treatments following trauma on the battlefield other than opioids, which are limited by respiratory depression. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (“neuromodulation”) has been proposed as an analgesic, but requires physician-level skills, advanced equipment, and an hour to administer. In contrast, percutaneous auricular neuromodulation may be placed by a medic in the field under nonsterile conditions in a few minutes, theoretically provides analgesia for any anatomic location, has no side effects, and no significant risks. It therefore offers the potential to be applied quickly on the battlefield without any of the limitations of opioids. We propose total joint replacement as a surrogate for battlefield trauma and here present a case report to demonstrate proof of concept.

Clinical perspectives on vagus nerve stimulation: present and future

The vagus nerve, the great wanderer, is involved in numerous processes throughout the body and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has the potential to modulate many of these functions. This wide-reaching capability has generated much interest across a range of disciplines resulting in several clinical trials and studies into the mechanistic basis of VNS. This review discusses current preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the efficacy of VNS in different diseases and highlights recent advancements. Studies that provide insights into the mechanism of VNS are considered.

Auricular field nerve stimulation using the NSS-2 BRIDGE® device as an alternative to opioids following kidney donor surgery

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role that the NSS-2 BRIDGE^® device, an auricular field nerve stimulator, may play in reducing opioid requirement and pain in kidney donor surgery. It was not a randomized study. Electrophysiologic studies have demonstrated that the stimulation of the cranial nerves produced by the NSS-2 BRIDGE^® device modulates the ascending/descending spinal pain pathways, especially at the level of the limbic system.

METHODS

The design compared the effects of the NSS-2 BRIDGE^® device (NSS 2-BRIDGE^® device group; n=10) to a control group (n=10). In both groups, the surgery was performed using the same standard enhanced recovery after surgery protocol based on the use of a multimodal analgesic approach. For the active treatment group, the NSS-2 BRIDGE^® device was placed in the post anesthesia care unit. The primary endpoint was opioid requirement (oral morphine equivalent, OME in mg) at 24 h post-surgery. Secondary endpoints included pain (0-10), at 24 and 48 h, time to discharge from the recovery room, incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting at 24 h, time to oral intake, time to ambulation, and time to discharge from the hospital. Data was analyzed using unpaired t-test and presented as mean ± standard deviation.

RESULTS

Compared to control, the use of the NSS-2 BRIDGE^® was associated with a 75.4% reduction in OME (33.6 vs. 8.3 mg; p=0.03) and 41.5% reduction in pain (5 vs. 3.28; p=0.06) at 24 h and a 73.3% difference in pain at 48 h (1.6 ± 1.6 vs. 6.0 ± 2.8; p=0.0004). There was no difference in non-opioid analgesics administration between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The tolerability of NSS-2 BRIDGE^® device was reported by most to be excellent. This study suggests that the NSS-2 BRIDGE^® device may represent a complementary approach for controlling postoperative opioid consumption and pain in patients undergoing kidney donation.