Modern surgical therapy: limb salvage and the role of amputation for extremity soft-tissue sarcomas

Challenges in the Management of Complex Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Clinical Scenarios

With nearly 15,000 new cases of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) in the United States each year, early diagnosis and therapeutic management is imperative for successful patient outcomes. Primary STS is conventionally treated with a combination of wide-margin resection, neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation therapy, and, in specific cases, adjuvant chemotherapy. However, in situations of complex disease presentation, guidelines for treatment are less clearly outlined. Limited metastatic disease, local recurrence, fungating STSs, and unplanned or incomplete resections of STSs present unique challenges for the multidisciplinary care team. The management of complex STS clinical scenarios usually involves limb-salvage resection or amputation as well as some combination of radiation therapy and/or ablative interventional radiology techniques. As a result, a multidisciplinary team approach is essential for treating patients in these challenging scenarios, with a recent focus on the integration of plastic and reconstructive surgery into the treatment algorithm.

Amputation in patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma: the experience of an East Asian referral center

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and clinical outcomes in a series of patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) who underwent amputation at a large East Asian referral center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of the 652 patients who underwent surgery for extremity STS, data of 37 consecutive patients who underwent amputation were reviewed retrospectively. The median follow-up period was 96.0 months (range, 15-216). The patients were classified in to three cohorts. The primary localized (PL) group included patients who underwent amputation as a primary surgical procedure with curative intent. The recurrent localized (RL) group included patients who underwent amputation as a revision procedure after failure of previous limb sparing surgeries. The metastatic group included patients who underwent amputation as a palliative procedure.

RESULTS

There were 22 cases of amputation in 596 STS patients and the amputation rate was 3.6% (22/596). Further, 1.8% (9/490) of patients with primary localized STS underwent amputation. Patients with localized STS who underwent amputation had a 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate of 89.9% (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 87.1-92.7%), a local-recurrence-free survival (LRFS) of 84.1% (95% CI, 80.5-87.6%), and a metastasis-free survival (MFS) of 84.6%. (95% CI, 81.1-88.0%) Compared with previous studies, our results showed higher DSS and MFS rates with similar LRFS.

CONCLUSIONS

The amputation rate of extremity STS in our institute in East Asia was similar but slightly lower than that reported in Western studies. The oncologic outcome of amputation reported in this study was higher than that indicated in Western studies and oncologic outcome of amputation was not statistically different from those of limb salvage surgery. However, considering the small cohort in single institute study, there is a possibility of selection bias and future multi-center study is necessary. From our results, amputation is still a feasible option for appropriately selected patients unsuitable for limb-conserving surgery.

Characteristic Evaluation of Recombinant MiSp/Poly(lactic-co-glycolic) Acid (PLGA) Nanofiber Scaffolds as Potential Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering

Biomaterial-based nanofibrous scaffolds are the most effective alternative to bone transplantation therapy. Here, two recombinant minor ampullate spidroins (spider silk proteins), R1SR2 and NR1SR2C, were blended with Poly(lactic-co-glycolic) Acid (PLGA), respectively, to generate nanofiber scaffolds by electrospinning. The N-terminal (N), C-terminal (C), repeating (R1 and R2) and spacer (S) modules were all derived from the minor ampullate spidroins (MiSp). The physical properties and structures of the blended scaffolds were measured by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), water contact angle measurement, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and Tensile mechanical testing. The results showed that blending of MiSp (R1SR2 and NR1SR2C) reduced the diameter of nanofibers, increased the porosity and glass transition temperatures of nanofibrous scaffolds, and effectively improved the hydrophilicity and ultimate strain of scaffolds. It is worth noting that the above changes were more significant in the presence of the N- and C-termini of MiSp. In cell culture assays, human bone mesenchymal stem cells (HBMSCs) grown on NR1SR2C/PLGA (20/80) scaffolds displayed markedly enhanced proliferative and adhesive abilities compared with counterparts grown on pure PLGA scaffolds. Jointly, these findings indicated recombinant MiSp/PLGA, particularly NR1SR2C/PLGA (20/80) blend nanofibrous scaffolds, is promising for bone tissue engineering.

Limb-sparing surgery with latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction in extremity soft tissue sarcoma: Case series

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Function-preserving and Limb-sparing surgery are now the accepted gold standard of care for Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma (ESTS) with the goal of surgery for STS of extremities to obtain local tumor control and minimal morbidity. Limb-sparing surgery with post-operative radiotherapy for STS results in high survival rates and local control. Adjuvant radio chemotherapy might improve distant and local recurrence in high-risk patients. Hence, we aim to present how to achieve local tumor control and minimal morbidity for high grade ESTS by conducting limb-sparing surgery combined with appropriate reconstruction and radio chemotherapy.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present 2 cases with high grade sarcoma that underwent limb-sparing surgery with Latissimus Dorsi (LD) flap reconstructions. Wide excisions were completed with limb-sparing surgeries for both cases with free surgical margins and LD flap reconstructions. There was no post-operative complication. Follow up examination revealed normal function of the arm. The first patient was still in remission after 2-years follow up. The second patient got pulmonary metastasis after complete resection and adjuvant radiotherapy.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Limb-sparing surgery with LD flap reconstruction is able to remove the tumor completely with negative margin for the primary objective. Secondary objectives are minimizing the morbidity, maximizing postoperative body functions, as well as achieving the best cosmetic value are also achieved. LD flap is commonly easy to harvest and able to give large tissue coverage for reconstruction after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Limb sparing surgery followed by soft-tissue reconstruction and radio chemotherapy are suitable for increasing oncologic outcome, tumor control, and limb preservation. However, inhibitions towards local recurrence and distant metastases were not guaranteed.

PLGA-Based Composites for Various Biomedical Applications

Polymeric materials have been extensively explored in the field of nanomedicine; within them, poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) holds a prominent position in micro- and nanotechnology due to its biocompatibility and controllable biodegradability. In this review we focus on the combination of PLGA with different inorganic nanomaterials in the form of nanocomposites to overcome the polymer’s limitations and extend its field of applications. We discuss their physicochemical properties and a variety of well-established synthesis methods for the preparation of different PLGA-based materials. Recent progress in the design and biomedical applications of PLGA-based materials are thoroughly discussed to provide a framework for future research.

Risk factors for the development of local recurrence in extremity soft-tissue sarcoma

INTRODUCTION

Local recurrence (LR) is one of the main pitfalls in surgery for extremities soft tissue sarcoma (eSTS). Achieving clear histopathological margins is the most important factor to reduce the risk of LR, but the ability to do so depends on not only surgical technique but also the interplay between tumor biology, anatomical location and surgical approach. The balance between postoperative morbidity and oncological benefits in reducing the risk of LR needs to be considered.

AREAS COVERED

This review will cover which etiological factors for the development of eSTS lead to an increased risk of LR and discuss histological subtypes that have a high risk of LR and which surgical and neoadjuvant therapeutic strategies can minimize the risk of LR.

EXPERT OPINION

The traditional view that surgical radicality always results in low rates of LR, while marginality alone always leads to high rates of relapse, is outdated. In the modern era of surgical oncology, limb salvage and high-level function after resectional surgery are the key surgical goals. The best results are achieved by combining effective neoadjuvant treatments with planned bespoke oncological operations that consider the biological and anatomical factors of each individual sarcoma.

Long-term patient-reported outcome measures following limb salvage with complex reconstruction or amputation in the treatment of upper extremity sarcoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study compares long-term patient-reported outcomes between patients that underwent limb-salvage surgery with complex reconstruction by free or pedicled flap (LS) or amputation. Additionally, the need for revision surgery is compared.

METHODS

A total of 43 patients were studied at a median follow-up of 9.54 years. Sixteen patients completed questionnaires regarding functional outcome and mental wellbeing. Functional outcomes were measured by using the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS), QuickDASH, and PROMIS Upper Extremity instruments. Mental wellbeing was assessed using the PROMIS Anxiety and Depression instruments. Revision surgery was assessed for the entire follow-up.

RESULTS

The median TESS scores were 96.0 versus 71.7 (p = 0.034) and the PROMIS Upper Extremity scores were 50.1 versus 40.3 (p = 0.039) for the LS and amputation cohorts, respectively. No significant difference was found regarding symptoms of anxiety (52.7 vs. 53.8; p = 0.587) or depression (52.0 vs. 50.5; p = 0.745). Of the patients in the LS cohort 51.6% required at least one reoperation compared to 8.33% in the amputation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

LS surgery maintains functional benefits over amputation after almost a decade of follow-up. Still, mental wellbeing seems to be comparable between these patients, whereas LS procedures are associated with a sixfold increased need for reoperations.

Disparities in Amputation Rates for Non-metastatic Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas and the Impact on Survival

BACKGROUND

There are no definitive recommendations guiding amputation use in extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STSs). This study explores disparities in amputation rates and survival in patients with non-metastatic adult-type extremity STSs.

METHODS

Patients with non-metastatic adult-type extremity STSs were identified from the 1998-2012 National Cancer Database. Factors affecting amputation were examined across all ages and separately in adults (> 40 years), adolescent/young adults (AYA: ages 15-39), and children (age < 15). Impact on 10-year overall survival (OS) was explored.

RESULTS

Of 15,886 patients, 4.65% had an amputation. AYAs had the most amputations (6.4%) compared to children (5.9%) and adults (4.2%) (p < 0.001). Patients with public insurance (OR 1.3, CI 1.08-1.58) and from central states (OR 1.5, CI 1.2-1.86) were more likely to undergo amputation, whereas those from high income brackets (OR 0.8, CI 0.62-0.94) and treated at community cancer centers were less likely (OR 0.7, CI 0.62-0.90). Amputation was an independent risk factor for death at 10 years, with the greatest impact in AYAs compared to older adults (HR 1.7, p < 0.001). Treatment in eastern or central states, lower income, lack of private insurance, and comorbidities were all associated with decreased OS (all p < 0.05). Female gender (HR 0.8, CI 0.78-0.89) and high-volume centers (HR 0.8, CI 0.74-0.94) were associated with improved OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Although amputations for extremity STSs are rare, disparities exist across age groups, insurance and geography when it comes to the use of amputation in patients with extremity STSs. Moreover, having an amputation is an independent risk factor for death, with the greatest impact in AYAs.

The Role of Reconstructive Surgery After Skeletal and Soft Tissue Sarcoma Resection

BACKGROUND

Skeletal and soft tissue reconstruction after sarcoma resection remains challenging. The use of advanced reconstructive techniques has been shown to improve function and increase rates of limb salvage. This study aims to analyze the utilization of plastic surgery within a multidisciplinary team approach after sarcoma resection at Duke University Medical Center from 2001 to 2014.

METHODS

Medical records were reviewed to determine procedure type, postoperative complications, and tumor recurrence. Observations were stratified by oncologic diagnosis, anatomic location, and procedure type. Patients were excluded if final pathology was not indicative of sarcoma, if resection or reconstruction was not performed at our institution, if resection preceded reconstruction by greater than 60 days, or if no follow-up was recorded within 3 months.

RESULTS

Of the 747 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 116 underwent reconstructive surgery. Tumor location was associated with a need for surgical reconstruction. Patients with upper (P = 0.0073) or lower (P = 0.0265) extremity tumors had a higher occurrence of plastic surgery involvement. Patients with a history of operative interventions had a higher likelihood of reconstructive surgery after oncologic resection (odds ratio, 1.649; P = 0.019). Neoadjuvant radiotherapy was associated with an increased likelihood of reconstructive plastic surgery after sarcoma resection (odds ratio, 2.131; P = 0.0004).

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the factors that necessitate reconstructive plastic surgery after sarcoma resection can enhance coordination of care within a multidisciplinary sarcoma center and leading to improved patient outcomes, including rates of limb salvage, as well as functionality and esthetic results.

Amputation for Extremity Sarcoma: Contemporary Indications and Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Amputation for localized extremity sarcoma (ES), once the primary therapy, is now rarely performed. We reviewed our experience to determine why patients with sarcoma still undergo immediate or delayed amputation, identify differences based on amputation timing, and evaluate outcomes.

METHODS

Records of patients with primary, nonmetastatic ES who underwent amputation at our institution from 2001 to 2011 were reviewed. Univariate analysis was performed, and survival outcomes were calculated.

RESULTS

We categorized 54 patients into three cohorts: primary amputation (A1, n = 18, 33%), secondary amputation after prior limb-sparing surgery (A2, n = 22, 41%), and hand and foot sarcomas (HF, n = 14, 26%). Median age at amputation was 54 years (range 18-88 years). Common indications for amputation (> 40%) were loss of function, bone involvement, multiple compartment involvement, and large tumor size (A1); proximal location, joint involvement, neurovascular compromise, multiple compartment involvement, multifocal or fungating tumor, loss of function, and large tumor size (A2); and joint involvement and prior unplanned surgery (HF). There was no difference in disease-specific survival (DSS) (p = 0.19) or metastasis-free survival (MFS) (p = 0.31) between early (A1) and delayed (A2) amputation. Compared with cohorts A1/A2, HF patients had longer overall survival (OS) (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Indications for amputation for extremity sarcoma vary between those who undergo primary amputation, delayed amputation, and amputation for hand or foot sarcoma. Amputations chosen judiciously are associated with excellent disease control and survival. For patients who ultimately need amputation, timing (early vs. delayed) does not affect survival.

Management of soft tissue tumors of the upper extremity: a review

Introduction: Management of malignant tumors of the hand and wrist is challenging and is generally approached by limb salvage or amputation. With advances in care, amputation has been superseded by limb salvage as the treatment of choice.

Methods: A narrative literature review was performed to identify articles on the topic of management of soft tissue tumors of the upper extremity, including surgical management, adjuvant radiation therapy, and chemotherapy.

Results: A total of 29 articles were selected. Earlier reports favored radical tumor resection, which often led to amputation, whereas later articles demonstrated limb salvage as the preferential treatment modality.

Conclusions: Given the detrimental effects on function and psychologic outcomes, amputation has been superseded by limb salvage in most cases, although it can occasionally be the only option. A variety of adjuvant therapies have been described, including radiation or brachytherapy, chemotherapy, and regional hyperthermia. Radiation treatment, and specifically brachytherapy, is beneficial to select patients. Controversy surrounds chemotherapy in certain subtypes, and regional hyperthermia requires further investigation.

PET/MR Imaging in Musculoskeletal Disorders

There is emerging evidence suggesting that PET/MR imaging will have a role in many aspects of musculoskeletal imaging. The synergistic potential of hybrid PET/MR imaging in terms of acquiring anatomic, molecular, and functional data simultaneously seems advantageous in the diagnostic workup, treatment planning and monitoring, and follow-up of patients with musculoskeletal malignancies, and may also prove helpful in assessment of musculoskeletal infectious and inflammatory disorders. The application of more sophisticated MR imaging sequences and PET radiotracers other than FDG in the diagnostic workup and follow-up of patients with musculoskeletal disorders should be explored.

Polylactic Acid Based Nanocomposites: Promising Safe and Biodegradable Materials in Biomedical Field

Polylactic acid (PLA) is widely used in biological areas due to its excellent compatibility, bioabsorbability, and degradation behavior in human bodies. Pure polylactic acid has difficulty in meeting all the requirements that specific field may demand. Therefore, PLA based nanocomposites are extensively investigated over the past few decades. PLA based nanocomposites include PLA based copolymers in nanometer size and nanocomposites with PLA or PLA copolymers as matrix and nanofillers as annexing agent. The small scale effect and surface effect of nanomaterials help improve the properties of PLA and make PLA based nanocomposites more popular compared with pure PLA materials. This review mainly introduces different kinds of PLA based nanocomposites in recent researches that have great potential to be used in biomedical fields including bone substitute and repair, tissue engineering, and drug delivery system.

Preclinical in vivo Performance of Novel Biodegradable, Electrospun Poly(lactic acid) and Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) Nanocomposites: A Review

Bone substitute materials have witnessed tremendous development over the past decades and autogenous bone may still be considered the gold standard for many clinicians and clinical approaches in order to rebuild and restore bone defects. However, a plethora of novel xenogenic and synthetic bone substitute materials have been introduced in recent years in the field of bone regeneration. As the development of bone is actually a calcification process within a collagen fiber arrangement, the use of scaffolds in the formation of fibers may offer some advantages, along with additional handling characteristics. This review focuses on material characteristics and degradation behavior of electrospun biodegradable polyester scaffolds. Furthermore, we concentrated on the preclinical in vivo performance with regard to bone regeneration in preclinical studies. The major findings are as follows: Scaffold composition and architecture determine its biological behavior and degradation characteristics; The incorporation of inorganic substances and/or organic substances within composite scaffolds enhances new bone formation; L-poly(lactic acid) and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) composite scaffolds, especially when combined with basic substances like hydroxyapatite, tricalcium phosphate or demineralized bone powder, seem not to induce inflammatory tissue reactions in vivo.

An overview of poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA)-based biomaterials for bone tissue engineering

Poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) has attracted considerable interest as a base material for biomedical applications due to its: (i) biocompatibility; (ii) tailored biodegradation rate (depending on the molecular weight and copolymer ratio); (iii) approval for clinical use in humans by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA); (iv) potential to modify surface properties to provide better interaction with biological materials; and (v) suitability for export to countries and cultures where implantation of animal-derived products is unpopular. This paper critically reviews the scientific challenge of manufacturing PLGA-based materials with suitable properties and shapes for specific biomedical applications, with special emphasis on bone tissue engineering. The analysis of the state of the art in the field reveals the presence of current innovative techniques for scaffolds and material manufacturing that are currently opening the way to prepare biomimetic PLGA substrates able to modulate cell interaction for improved substitution, restoration, or enhancement of bone tissue function.

Biomimetic polyurethanes in nano and regenerative medicine

Nature's inspiration is a promising tool to design new biomaterials especially for frontier technological areas such as tissue engineering and nanomedicine.

Phase I trial of concurrent sunitinib and radiation therapy as preoperative treatment for soft tissue sarcoma

INTRODUCTION

Although the introduction of multimodal treatment of soft tissue sarcoma improved local tumour control, local failure still occurs in a good number of patients. Therefore, further improvement of current treatment strategies is necessary. The proposed study treatment will combine standard external beam radiation and the orally administered receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Patients with soft tissue sarcoma will receive sunitinib and irradiation as neoadjuvant treatment. Radiotherapy will be administered as intensity modulated radiation therapy with a total dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions (5 1/2 weeks). Patients will receive sunitinib daily for 2 weeks prior to and then concurrently with irradiation. Sunitinib will be given in two dose levels. The first dose level will be 25 mg sunitinib per os daily. The second dose level will be 37.5 mg. A dose modification schedule according to a 3+3 design will be applied. Restaging and tumour resection will be performed 6 weeks after completion of sunitinib and irradiation. Primary outcome measures will be the dose-limiting toxicity and maximal tolerated dose of sunitinib administered concurrently with irradiation. Toxicity of the study treatment will be documented according to Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (CTCAE) 4.0. Secondary outcome measures will be the response to the study treatment and morbidity of the tumour resection. Imaging response will be determined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria comparing MRI performed prior to and 6 weeks after completion of study treatment. Pathological response will be determined evaluating the fraction of non-viable tumour in the resection specimen. Resection morbidity will be evaluated according to CTCAE 4.0.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approval was obtained from the ethics committee II of the University of Heidelberg, Germany (Reference number 2011-064F-MA). Furthermore, the study was approved by the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (Reference number 4037708).

TRIAL REGISTRATION EUDRACT

2007-002864-87 Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01498835.

Physicochemical properties and applications of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) for use in bone regeneration

Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) is the most often used synthetic polymer within the field of bone regeneration owing to its biocompatibility and biodegradability. As a consequence, a large number of medical devices comprising PLGA have been approved for clinical use in humans by the American Food and Drug Administration. As compared with the homopolymers of lactic acid poly(lactic acid) and poly(glycolic acid), the co-polymer PLGA is much more versatile with regard to the control over degradation rate. As a material for bone regeneration, the use of PLGA has been extensively studied for application and is included as either scaffolds, coatings, fibers, or micro- and nanospheres to meet various clinical requirements.

Can bone tissue engineering contribute to therapy concepts after resection of musculoskeletal sarcoma?

Resection of musculoskeletal sarcoma can result in large bone defects where regeneration is needed in a quantity far beyond the normal potential of self-healing. In many cases, these defects exhibit a limited intrinsic regenerative potential due to an adjuvant therapeutic regimen, seroma, or infection. Therefore, reconstruction of these defects is still one of the most demanding procedures in orthopaedic surgery. The constraints of common treatment strategies have triggered a need for new therapeutic concepts to design and engineer unparalleled structural and functioning bone grafts. To satisfy the need for long-term repair and good clinical outcome, a paradigm shift is needed from methods to replace tissues with inert medical devices to more biological approaches that focus on the repair and reconstruction of tissue structure and function. It is within this context that the field of bone tissue engineering can offer solutions to be implemented into surgical therapy concepts after resection of bone and soft tissue sarcoma. In this paper we will discuss the implementation of tissue engineering concepts into the clinical field of orthopaedic oncology.

The use of isolated limb infusion in limb threatening extremity sarcomas

This paper reports a single-institution experience with the use of isolated limb infusion for limb salvage in locally advanced, unresectable, recurrent limb threatening soft tissue sarcomas.

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced, limb threatening soft tissue sarcomas (STS) pose a significant treatment challenge. We report our experience using isolated limb infusion (ILI) in patients with unresectable extremity STS.

METHODS

A total of 22 patients with extremity STS underwent 26 ILIs with melphalan and dactinomycin. Patient characteristics, intra-operative parameters and toxicity were recorded. Outcome measures included limb-salvage and in-field response rates.

RESULTS

Of the 19 lower and 7 upper extremity ILIs, Wieberdink grade III toxicity or less was observed in all. Median followup was 11 months. A total of 17 patients were evaluable at 3 months post-ILI with an overall response rate of 42%. Four (24%) had complete response (CR), three (18%) partial response (PR), three (18%) stable disease (SD) and seven (41%) progressive disease (PD). Twelve of 17 (71%) underwent successful limb preservation at a median of 9 months post-ILI. Two (12%) were downstaged to resectable disease and remain showing no evidence of disease (NED) after surgery at 30 and 22 months post-ILI.

CONCLUSIONS

ILI is an attractive modality that provides regional disease control and limb preservation in patients with limb threatening sarcoma. Although short-term results appear encouraging, long-term follow-up is needed to fully assess the role of ILI in unresectable extremity STS.