Randomized Clinical Trials in Pancreatic Cancer

The Diverse Applications of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Organoids

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal solid malignancies. While immortalized cancer cell lines and genetically engineered murine models have increased our understanding of PDAC tumorigenesis, they do not recapitulate inter- and intra-patient heterogeneity. PDAC patient derived organoid (PDO) biobanks have overcome this hurdle, and provide an opportunity for the high throughput screening of potential new therapies. This review provides a summary of the PDAC PDO biobanks established to date, and discusses how they have advanced our understanding of PDAC biology. Looking forward, the development of coculturing techniques for specific immune or stromal cell populations will enable a better understanding of the crosstalk that occurs within the tumor microenvironment, and the impact of this crosstalk on treatment response.

Missing the target in cancer therapy

The deployment of molecular biomarkers that are indicative of sensitivity to tumor-targeted or immune-targeted cancer therapies improves the outcome of individual patients and increases the chances of successful drug approval. However, for many lethal malignancies, the majority of clinical trials are conducted with patients who do not have biomarkers and hence they miss the target.

Patients with hepatic oligometastatic pancreatic body/tail ductal adenocarcinoma may benefit from synchronous resection

BACKGROUND

Synchronous resection of primary pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and liver metastases in highly selective patients is being accepted based on oncology research progress showing safe surgical outcomes with low morbidity and mortality. We also tried to determine patients who would benefit from the operation.

METHODS

From January 2012 to October 2017, 48 patients who underwent synchronous resection of primary PDAC and liver metastases were retrospectively evaluated. Twenty-three of them underwent oligometastatic synchronous resection.

RESULTS

The majority of synchronous resection PDAC patients underwent hepatic wedge resection, and no oligometastatic patient was treated with hemihepatectomy. The median overall survival (OS) of the synchronous resection patients was 7.8 months. Hepatic oligometastatic PDAC patients had a longer OS than that of non-oligometastatic synchronous resection patients, systemic chemotherapy patients and palliative patients (16.1 vs 6.4 months, P = 0.02; 16.1 vs 7.6 months, P = 0.02; 16.1 vs 4.3 months, P < 0.0001; respectively). Further analysis showed that localized pancreatic body/tail PDAC had a better OS in oligometastatic patients than in non-oligometastatic synchronous resection patients (16.8 months vs 7.05 months, P = 0.0004) and systemic chemotherapy patients (16.8 months vs 8 months, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Patients with pancreatic body/tail PDAC with liver oligometastases can benefit from synchronous resection.

Use of radiotherapy in patients with palliative double bypass for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Purpose

Pancreatic cancer (PC) has not changed overall survival in recent years despite therapeutic efforts. Surgery with curative intent has shown the best long-term oncological results. However, 80%–85% of patients with these tumors are unresectable at the time of diagnosis. In those patients, first therapeutic attempts are minimally invasive or surgical procedures to alleviate symptoms. The addition of radiotherapy (RT) to standard chemotherapy, ergo chemoradiation, in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is still controversial. The study aims to compare outcomes in patients with a double bypass surgery due to LAPC treated or not with RT.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective cohort study of patients with double bypass for LAPC were registered and divided into two groups: treated or not with postoperative RT. Baseline characteristics, postoperative complications, those related to RT and their relation to the main event (mortality) were compared.

Results

Seventy-four patients were included. Surgical complications between the groups did not offer significant differences. Complications related to RT were mostly mild, and 86% of patients completed the treatment. Overall survival at 1 and 2 years for patients in the exposed group was 64% and 35% vs. 50% and 28% in the non-exposed group, respectively (p = 0.11; power 72%; hazard ratio = 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.24–1.18).

Conclusion

We observed a tendency for survival improvement in patients with postoperative RT. However, we’ve not had enough power to demonstrate this difference, possibly due to the small sample size. It is indispensable to develop randomized and prospective trials to guide more specific treatment lines in this patients.