1
|
Rietveld PCS, Sassen SDT, Guchelaar NAD, van Eerden RAG, de Boer NL, van den Heuvel TBM, Burger JWA, Mathijssen RHJ, Koch BCP, Koolen SLW. Population pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal irinotecan and SN-38 in patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal origin. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 2024; 13:1006-1016. [PMID: 38634204 PMCID: PMC11179701 DOI: 10.1002/psp4.13136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal metastases (PM) are common in patients with colorectal cancer. Patients with PM have a poor prognosis, and for those who are not eligible for cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), palliative chemotherapy is currently the only option. Recently, we conducted a phase I trial (INTERACT) in which irinotecan was administered intraperitoneally (IP) to 18 patients ineligible for CRS-HIPEC. The primary objective was to evaluate covariates influencing the PK profile of irinotecan and SN-38 after IP administration. Secondly, a population PK model was developed to support the further development of IP irinotecan by improving dosing in patients with PM. Patients were treated with IP irinotecan every 2 weeks in combination with systemic FOLFOX-bevacizumab. Irinotecan and SN-38 were measured in plasma (588 samples) and SN-38 was measured in peritoneal fluid (267 samples). Concentration-Time data were log-transformed and analyzed using NONMEM version 7.5 using FOCE+I estimation. An additive error model described the residual error, with inter-individual variability in PK parameters modeled exponentially. The final structural model consisted of five compartments. Weight was identified as a covariate influencing the SN-38 plasma volume of distribution and GGT was found to influence the SN-38 plasma clearance. This population PK model adequately described the irinotecan and SN-38 in plasma after IP administration, with weight and GGT as predictive factors. Irinotecan is converted intraperitoneal to SN-38 by carboxylesterases and the plasma bioavailability of irinotecan is low. This model will be used for the further clinical development of IP irinotecan by providing dosing strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascale C. S. Rietveld
- Department of Clinical PharmacyErasmus MCRotterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of Medical OncologyErasmus MC Cancer InstituteRotterdamThe Netherlands
- Rotterdam Clinical Pharmacometrics GroupRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan D. T. Sassen
- Department of Clinical PharmacyErasmus MCRotterdamThe Netherlands
- Rotterdam Clinical Pharmacometrics GroupRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | | | - Nadine L. de Boer
- Department of Surgical OncologyErasmus MC Cancer InstituteRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | | | - Ron H. J. Mathijssen
- Department of Medical OncologyErasmus MC Cancer InstituteRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Birgit C. P. Koch
- Department of Clinical PharmacyErasmus MCRotterdamThe Netherlands
- Rotterdam Clinical Pharmacometrics GroupRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Stijn L. W. Koolen
- Department of Clinical PharmacyErasmus MCRotterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of Medical OncologyErasmus MC Cancer InstituteRotterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Adam MA, Zhou H, Byrd J, Greenberg AL, Kelly YM, Hall L, Jones HL, Pingpank JF, Lipton ZC, Bartlett DL, Choudry HM. Predicting Severe Complications from Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A Data-Driven, Machine Learning Approach to Augment Clinical Judgment. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:5433-5442. [PMID: 37266808 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13657-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CRS-HIPEC provides oncologic benefit in well-selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis; however, it is a morbid procedure. Decision tools for preoperative patient selection are limited. We developed a risk score to predict severity of 90 day complications for cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Adults who underwent CRS-HIPEC at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (March 2001-April 2020) were analyzed as part of this study. Primary endpoint was severe complications within 90 days following CRS-HIPEC, defined using Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) scores as a dichotomous (determined using restricted cubic splines) and continuous variable. Data were divided into training and test sets. Several machine learning and traditional algorithms were considered. RESULTS For the 1959 CRS-HIPEC procedures included, CCI ranged from 0 to 100 (median 32.0). Adjusted restricted cubic splines model defined severe complications as CCI > 61. A minimum of 20 variables achieved optimal performance of any of the models. Linear regression achieved the highest area under the receiving operator characteristic curve (AUC, 0.74) and outperformed the NSQIP Surgical Risk calculator (AUC 0.80 vs. 0.66). Factors most positively associated with severe complications included peritoneal carcinomatosis index score, symptomatic status, and undergoing pancreatectomy, while American Society of Anesthesiologists 2 class, appendiceal diagnosis, and preoperative albumin were most negatively associated with severe complications. CONCLUSIONS This study refines our ability to predict severe complications within 90 days of discharge from a hospitalization in which CRS-HIPEC was performed. This advancement is timely and relevant given the growing interest in this procedure and may have implications for patient selection, patient and referring provider comfort, and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helen Zhou
- Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Lauren Hall
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Heather L Jones
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Agnes A, Biondi A, Persiani R, Laurino A, Reddavid R, De Giuli M, Sicoli F, Cananzi F, De Pascale S, Fumagalli U, Galli F, Rausei S, Lorenzon L, D'Ugo D. Development of the PERI-Gastric (PEritoneal Recurrence Index) and PERI-Gram (Peritoneal Recurrence Index NomoGRAM) for predicting the risk of metachronous peritoneal carcinomatosis after gastrectomy with curative intent for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2022; 25:629-639. [PMID: 34811622 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-021-01268-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A model that quantifies the risk of peritoneal recurrence would be a useful tool for improving decision-making in patients undergoing curative-aim gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC). METHODS Five Italian centers participated in this study. Two risk scores were created according to the two most widely used pathologic classifications of GC (the Lauren classification and the presence of signet-ring-cell features). The risk scores (the PERI-Gastric 1 and 2) were based on the results of multivariable logistic regressions and presented as nomograms (the PERI-Gram 1 and 2). Discrimination was assessed with the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating curves. Calibration graphs were constructed by plotting the actual versus the predicted rate of peritoneal recurrence. Internal validation was performed with a bootstrap resampling method (1000 iterations). RESULTS The models were developed based on a population of 645 patients (selected from 1580 patients treated from 1998 to 2018). In the PERI-Gastric 1, significant variables were linitis plastica, stump GC, pT3-4, pN2-3 and the Lauren diffuse histotype, while in the PERI-Gastric 2, significant variables were linitis plastica, stump GC, pT3-4, pN2-3 and the presence of signet-ring cells. The AUC was 0,828 (0.778-0.877) for the PERI-Gastric 1 and 0,805 (0.755-0.855) for the PERI-Gastric 2. After bootstrap resampling, the PERI-Gastric 1 had a mean AUC of 0.775 (0.721-0.830) and a 95%CI estimate for the calibration slope of 0.852-1.505 and the PERI-Gastric 2 a mean AUC of 0.749 (0.693-0.805) and a 95%CI estimate for the slope of 0.777-1.351. The models are available at www.perigastric.org . CONCLUSIONS We developed the PERI-Gastric and the PERI-Gram as instruments to determine the risk of peritoneal recurrence after curative-aim gastrectomy. These models could direct the administration of prophylactic intraperitoneal treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annamaria Agnes
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F. Vito n.1, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli n. 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Biondi
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F. Vito n.1, 00168, Rome, Italy.
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli n. 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
| | - Roberto Persiani
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F. Vito n.1, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli n. 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Laurino
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F. Vito n.1, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli n. 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Rossella Reddavid
- Department of Oncology, Surgical Oncology and Digestive Surgery Unit, San Luigi University Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Maurizio De Giuli
- Department of Oncology, Surgical Oncology and Digestive Surgery Unit, San Luigi University Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Federico Sicoli
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Ferdinando Cananzi
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Stefano De Pascale
- Digestive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Uberto Fumagalli
- Digestive Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Galli
- ASST Sette Laghi, Presidio Ospedaliero Gallarate, Corso Leonardo da Vinci, 1, 21013, Gallarate, Italy
| | - Stefano Rausei
- ASST Sette Laghi, Presidio Ospedaliero Gallarate, Corso Leonardo da Vinci, 1, 21013, Gallarate, Italy
| | - Laura Lorenzon
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F. Vito n.1, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli n. 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Domenico D'Ugo
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo F. Vito n.1, 00168, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli n. 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Guel-Klein S, Alberto Vilchez ME, Ceelen W, Rau B, Brandl A. Is PIPAC a Treatment Option in Upper and Lower Gastrointestinal Cancer with Peritoneal Metastasis? Visc Med 2022; 38:90-98. [PMID: 35614892 PMCID: PMC9082136 DOI: 10.1159/000523901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The survival prognosis of patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer is generally poor and treatment consists of, according to international guidelines, systemic chemotherapy. A multimodal treatment approach, including cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, not only proved to be beneficial mainly in colorectal cancer, but also in selected patients with gastric cancer. The authors performed systematic research of articles and ongoing clinical trials using the keywords "PIPAC" and "gastric cancer" or "colorectal cancer" in PubMed in October 2021. Key findings, such as complications rates, treatment protocols, and overall survival were summarized and illustrated in Tables and critically discussed. Summary Twenty years ago, the technique of Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) was developed by Reymond et al. and delivered evidence to be recognized as a basic therapeutic tool in this multimodal therapy. Currently, there are several ongoing Phase II and III trials exploring the usage and efficacy of PIPAC as a neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or palliative component of treatment in patients with PM of GI cancer. Key Messages The aim of this narrative review was to help navigate the reader throughout the most current evidence for the use PIPAC and to highlight its indication in patients with upper and lower GI cancer with PM. It also provides an outline of ongoing studies and future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Safak Guel-Klein
- Department of Surgery, Charité − Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Miguel Enrique Alberto Vilchez
- Department of Surgery, Charité − Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wim Ceelen
- Department of GI Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Beate Rau
- Department of Surgery, Charité − Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Brandl
- Department of Surgery, Charité − Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany,Digestive Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal,*Andreas Brandl,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dumont F, Passot C, Raoul JL, Kepenekian V, Lelièvre B, Boisdron-Celle M, Hiret S, Senellart H, Pein F, Blanc-Lapierre A, Raimbourg J, Thibaudeau E, Glehen O. A phase I dose-escalation study of oxaliplatin delivered via a laparoscopic approach using pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy for advanced peritoneal metastases of gastrointestinal tract cancers. Eur J Cancer 2020; 140:37-44. [PMID: 33039812 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objectives were to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety profile and pharmacokinetics (PKs) of intraperitoneal oxaliplatin delivered by pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in patients with advanced peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastrointestinal tract cancers. METHODS PIPAC was applied every 4-6 weeks, for 5 cycles, in a phase I dose-escalation study using a 3 + 3 design. The first dose level was 90 mg/m2 with planned increases of 50 mg/m2 per level. Platinum concentration was measured in plasma, tissues and intraperitoneal fluid samples. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03294252). RESULTS Ten patients with 33 PIPAC sessions were included. No dose limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred at 90 mg/m2 and two at 140 mg/m2. The MTD was therefore set at 90 mg/m2. Overall treatment included a median number of three PIPAC sessions (range: 1-5) and secondary complete cytoreductive surgery for two patients. Overall safety showed 67 grade I-II and 11 grade III-IV toxicities, usually haematologic, digestive (nausea/vomiting, abdominal pain), and fatigue. Oxaliplatin concentrations were three- to four-fold higher in tissue in contact with aerosol than in muscle without contact. At 140 mg/m2, the plasma oxaliplatin concentration was high with Cmax and area under the curve (AUC)0-48h of 1035 μg/l and 9028 μg h/L, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The MTD of oxaliplatin during PIPAC is 90 mg/m2. PK data demonstrate a high tumour concentration and a significant systemic absorption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frédéric Dumont
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France.
| | - Christophe Passot
- Oncopharmacology - Pharmacogenetics, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Angers, France
| | - Jean-Luc Raoul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Vahan Kepenekian
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - Bénédicte Lelièvre
- Laboratory of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire, Angers, France
| | | | - Sandrine Hiret
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Hélène Senellart
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Francois Pein
- Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Audrey Blanc-Lapierre
- Department of Biostatistics and Methodology, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Judith Raimbourg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Emilie Thibaudeau
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Bénite, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Van de Sande L, Rahimi‐Gorji M, Giordano S, Davoli E, Matteo C, Detlefsen S, D'Herde K, Braet H, Shariati M, Remaut K, Xie F, Debbaut C, Ghorbaniasl G, Cosyns S, Willaert W, Ceelen W. Electrostatic Intraperitoneal Aerosol Delivery of Nanoparticles: Proof of Concept and Preclinical Validation. Adv Healthc Mater 2020; 9:e2000655. [PMID: 32548967 DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202000655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
There is an increasing interest in intraperitoneal delivery of chemotherapy as an aerosol in patients with peritoneal metastasis. The currently used technology is hampered by inhomogenous drug delivery throughout the peritoneal cavity because of gravity, drag, and inertial impaction. Addition of an electrical force to aerosol particles, exerted by an electrostatic field, can improve spatial aerosol homogeneity and enhance tissue penetration. A computational fluid dynamics model shows that electrostatic precipitation (EP) results in a significantly improved aerosol distribution. Fluorescent nanoparticles (NPs) remain stable after nebulization in vitro, while EP significantly improves spatial homogeneity of NP distribution. Next, pressurized intraperitoneal chemotherapy with and without EP using NP albumin bound paclitaxel (Nab-PTX) in a novel rat model is examined. EP does not worsen the effects of CO2 insufflation and intraperitoneal Nab-PTX on mesothelial structural integrity or the severity of peritoneal inflammation. Importantly, EP significantly enhances tissue penetration of Nab-PTX in the anatomical regions not facing the nozzle of the nebulizer. Also, the addition of EP leads to more homogenous peritoneal tissue concentrations of Nab-PTX, in parallel with higher plasma concentrations. In conclusion, EP enhances spatial homogeneity and tissue uptake after intraperitoneal nebulization of anticancer NPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leen Van de Sande
- Department of Human Structure and RepairGhent University Corneel Heymanslaan 10 Ghent 9000 Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG)Ghent University Corneel Heymanslaan 10 Ghent 9000 Belgium
| | - Mohammad Rahimi‐Gorji
- Department of Human Structure and RepairGhent University Corneel Heymanslaan 10 Ghent 9000 Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG)Ghent University Corneel Heymanslaan 10 Ghent 9000 Belgium
- IBiTech – bioMMedaGhent University Corneel Heymanslaan 10 Ghent 9000 Belgium
| | - Silvia Giordano
- Mass Spectrometry LaboratoryIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS Via Mario Negri 2 Milan 20156 Italy
| | - Enrico Davoli
- Mass Spectrometry LaboratoryIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS Via Mario Negri 2 Milan 20156 Italy
| | - Cristina Matteo
- Cancer Pharmacology LaboratoryIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS Via Mario Negri 2 Milan 20156 Italy
| | - Sönke Detlefsen
- Department of PathologyOdense University Hospital J.B. Winsløws Vej 4 Odense 5000 Denmark
- Department of Clinical ResearchUniversity of Southern Denmark Winsløwsparken 19 Odense 5000 Denmark
| | - Katharina D'Herde
- Department of Human Structure and RepairGhent University Corneel Heymanslaan 10 Ghent 9000 Belgium
| | - Helena Braet
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG)Ghent University Corneel Heymanslaan 10 Ghent 9000 Belgium
- Laboratory of General Biochemistry and Physical PharmacyFaculty of Pharmaceutical SciencesGhent University Ottergemsesteenweg 460 Ghent 9000 Belgium
| | - Molood Shariati
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG)Ghent University Corneel Heymanslaan 10 Ghent 9000 Belgium
- Laboratory of General Biochemistry and Physical PharmacyFaculty of Pharmaceutical SciencesGhent University Ottergemsesteenweg 460 Ghent 9000 Belgium
| | - Katrien Remaut
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG)Ghent University Corneel Heymanslaan 10 Ghent 9000 Belgium
- Laboratory of General Biochemistry and Physical PharmacyFaculty of Pharmaceutical SciencesGhent University Ottergemsesteenweg 460 Ghent 9000 Belgium
| | - Feifan Xie
- Laboratory of Medical Biochemistry and Clinical AnalysisFaculty of Pharmaceutical SciencesGhent University Ottergemsesteenweg 460 Ghent 9000 Belgium
| | - Charlotte Debbaut
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG)Ghent University Corneel Heymanslaan 10 Ghent 9000 Belgium
- IBiTech – bioMMedaGhent University Corneel Heymanslaan 10 Ghent 9000 Belgium
| | - Ghader Ghorbaniasl
- Department of Mechanical EngineeringVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) Pleinlaan 2 Brussels 1050 Belgium
| | - Sarah Cosyns
- Department of Human Structure and RepairGhent University Corneel Heymanslaan 10 Ghent 9000 Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG)Ghent University Corneel Heymanslaan 10 Ghent 9000 Belgium
| | - Wouter Willaert
- Department of Human Structure and RepairGhent University Corneel Heymanslaan 10 Ghent 9000 Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG)Ghent University Corneel Heymanslaan 10 Ghent 9000 Belgium
| | - Wim Ceelen
- Department of Human Structure and RepairGhent University Corneel Heymanslaan 10 Ghent 9000 Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG)Ghent University Corneel Heymanslaan 10 Ghent 9000 Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and RepairGhent University Corneel Heymanslaan 10 Ghent 9000 Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ceelen W, Braet H, van Ramshorst G, Willaert W, Remaut K. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastases: an expert opinion. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2020; 17:511-522. [PMID: 32142389 DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2020.1736551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: The rationale for intraperitoneal (IP) drug delivery for patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) is based on the pharmacokinetic advantage resulting from the peritoneal-plasma barrier, and on the potential to adequately treat small, poorly vascularized PM. Despite a history of more than three decades, many aspects of IP drug delivery remain poorly studied.Areas covered: We outline the anatomy and physiology of the peritoneal cavity, including the pharmacokinetics of IP drug delivery. We discuss transport mechanisms governing tissue penetration of IP chemotherapy, and how these are affected by the biomechanical properties of the tumor stroma. We provide an overview of the current clinical evidence on IP chemotherapy in ovarian, colorectal, and gastric cancer. We discuss the current limitations of IP drug delivery and propose several potential areas of progress.Expert opinion: The potential of IP drug delivery is hampered by off-label use of drugs developed for systemic therapy. The efficacy of IP chemotherapy for PM depends on cancer type, disease extent, and mode of drug delivery. Results from ongoing randomized trials will allow to better delineate the potential of IP chemotherapy. Promising approaches include IP aerosol therapy, prolonged delivery platforms such as gels or biomaterials, and the use of nanomedicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wim Ceelen
- Department of GI Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.,Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Belgium
| | - Helena Braet
- Ghent Research Group on Nanomedicines, Laboratory of General Biochemistry and Physical Pharmacy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Wouter Willaert
- Department of GI Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Katrien Remaut
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Belgium.,Ghent Research Group on Nanomedicines, Laboratory of General Biochemistry and Physical Pharmacy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schredl P, Ramspott JP, Neureiter D, Emmanuel K, Jäger T. The PEritoneal SUrface CAlculator (PESUCA): A new tool to quantify the resected peritoneal surface area after cytoreductive surgery. Pleura Peritoneum 2020; 5:20190031. [PMID: 32885035 PMCID: PMC7446256 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2019-0031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2019] [Accepted: 12/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The body surface area (BSA) is taken as a measure for the effective contact area for dosing in hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Currently, the pharmacokinetic effect of the reduced peritoneal surface area (PSA) after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) during HIPEC remains unclear. Here a proprietary software solution (PEritoneal SUrface CAlculator (PESUCA)) to quantify the resected PSA in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM) undergoing CRS and HIPEC is presented. METHODS The PESUCA tool was programmed as a desktop and online software solution. The applicability was evaluated in 36 patients. The programming-algorithm is briefly summarized as follows: (1) calculation of BSA, (2) correlation to PSA, (3) calculation of the relative proportion of 40 different anatomical regions to total PSA before CRS, (4) instantaneous input of each resected proportion in the 40 anatomical regions during CRS, and (5) determination of the resected and remaining PSA after CRS. RESULTS The proof of concept revealed a mean PSA of all patients before CRS of 18,741 ± 321 cm2 compared to 13,611 ± 485 cm2 after CRS (p<0.0001). Patients' supramesocolic and inframesocolic visceral and parietal peritoneal area before and after CRS procedure were quantitatively determined. CONCLUSIONS Here the first tool that enables detailed PSA quantification in patients with PSM undergoing CRS is presented. This makes the software a valuable contribution to ensue more accurate assessment and improved comparability of peritoneal disease extent. Furthermore, after external validation, PESUCA could be the basis for dose adjustment of intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimens based on the remaining PSA after CRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Schredl
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), Müllner Hauptstraße 48, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Jan Philipp Ramspott
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Henricistraße 92, Essen, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), Müllner Hauptstraße 48, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Daniel Neureiter
- Institute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), Müllner Hauptstr. 48, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Klaus Emmanuel
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), Müllner Hauptstraße 48, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Tarkan Jäger
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), Müllner Hauptstraße 48, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Intraperitoneal aerosolized drug delivery: Technology, recent developments, and future outlook. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2020; 160:105-114. [PMID: 33132169 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2020.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Revised: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Current therapies for patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) are only moderately effective. Recently, a novel locoregional treatment method for PM was introduced, consisting of a combination of laparoscopy with intraperitoneal (IP) delivery of anticancer agents as an aerosol. This 'pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy' (PIPAC) may enhance tissue drug penetration by the elevated IP pressure during CO2 capnoperitoneum. Also, repeated PIPAC cycles allow to accurately stage peritoneal disease and verify histological response to treatment. This review provides an overview of the rationale, indications, and currently used technology for therapeutic IP nebulization, and discusses the basic mechanisms governing aerosol particle transport and peritoneal deposition. We discuss early clinical results in patients with advanced, irresectable PM and highlight the potential of electrostatic aerosol precipitation. Finally, we discuss promising novel approaches, including nebulization of nanoparticles and prolonged release formulations.
Collapse
|
10
|
Lemoine L, Thijssen E, Carleer R, Geboers K, Sugarbaker P, van der Speeten K. Body surface area-based vs concentration-based perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy after optimal cytoreductive surgery in colorectal peritoneal surface malignancy treatment: COBOX trial. J Surg Oncol 2019; 119:999-1010. [PMID: 30838646 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2018] [Revised: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal perioperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) are the standard of care for patients diagnosed with colorectal peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM). Despite a clearly defined standardization of CRS, a large variety of HIPEC modalities are still used in clinical practice. METHODS Body surface area (BSA)- and concentration-based HIPEC protocols were clinically and pharmacologically evaluated in a randomized phase III clinical pilot trial. Oxaliplatin dose was 460 mg/m 2 (BSA-based) in 2 L/m 2 carrier solution (concentration-based). Platinum quantification was performed using a validated inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry method. Three-month morbidity, mortality, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were assessed. RESULTS Thirty-one patients were randomized to either BSA- or concentration-based HIPEC. Toxicity and efficacy were higher (P < 0.001) in patients receiving concentration-based HIPEC. There was no difference in pharmacologic advantage between the two groups. A higher drug concentration in the tumor nodule at the end of HIPEC was found in the HIPEC-concentration group. There was no difference in major morbidity and mortality between the treatment groups. HRQOL was decreased 3 months postoperatively in the HIPEC-concentration group. CONCLUSION Concentration-based chemotherapy delivers the drug in the most standardized way to the tumor nodule, resulting in increasing drug concentrations in the tumor nodule without increasing major morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieselotte Lemoine
- Department of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | - Elsy Thijssen
- Applied and Analytical Chemistry, Institute for Materials Research, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Robert Carleer
- Applied and Analytical Chemistry, Institute for Materials Research, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Karlien Geboers
- Department of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Paul Sugarbaker
- Center for Gastrointestinal Malignancies, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Kurt van der Speeten
- Department of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lemoine L, Thijssen E, Carleer R, Cops J, Lemmens V, Eyken PV, Sugarbaker P, der Speeten KV. Body surface area-based versus concentration-based intraperitoneal perioperative chemotherapy in a rat model of colorectal peritoneal surface malignancy: pharmacologic guidance towards standardization. Oncotarget 2019; 10:1407-1424. [PMID: 30858926 PMCID: PMC6402719 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.26667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2018] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Worldwide, cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal perioperative chemotherapy (HIPEC) are used in current clinical practice for colorectal peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) treatment. Although, there is an acknowledged standardization regarding the CRS, we are still lacking a much-needed standardization amongst the various intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy protocols, including the HIPEC dosing regimen. We should rely on pharmacologic evidence building towards such a standardization. The current IP chemotherapy dosing regimens can be divided into body surface area (BSA)-based and concentration-based protocols. A preclinical animal study was designed to evaluate pharmacologic advantage (PA), efficacy and survival. WAG/Rij rats were IP injected with the rat colonic carcinoma cell line CC-531. Animals were randomized into three groups: CRS alone or CRS combined with oxaliplatin-based HIPEC (either BSA- or concentration-based). There was no difference in PA between the two groups (p=0.283). Platinum concentration in the tumor nodule was significantly higher in the concentration-based group (p<0.001). Median survival did not differ between the treatment groups (p<0.250). This preclinical study, in contrast to previous thinking, clearly demonstrates that the PA does not provide any information about the true efficacy of the drug and emphasizes the importance of the tumor nodule as pharmacologic endpoint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieselotte Lemoine
- Department of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | - Elsy Thijssen
- Department of Applied and Analytical Chemistry, Institute for Materials Research (IMO), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Robert Carleer
- Department of Applied and Analytical Chemistry, Institute for Materials Research (IMO), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Jirka Cops
- Department of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.,Department of Medicine and Life Sciences, Biomedical Research Institute, Rehabilitation Research Center, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Veerle Lemmens
- Department of Medicine and Life Sciences, Dynamic Bioimaging Laboratory, Advanced Optical Microscopy Centre, Biomedical Research Institute (BIOMED), Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Peter Van Eyken
- Department of Pathology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | - Paul Sugarbaker
- Center for Gastrointestinal Malignancies, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Kurt Van der Speeten
- Department of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy and its effect on gastric-cancer-derived peritoneal metastases: an overview. Clin Exp Metastasis 2019; 36:1-14. [PMID: 30715654 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-019-09955-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2018] [Accepted: 01/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
This manuscript aspires to portray a review of the current literature focusing on manifest peritoneal metastasis (PM) derived from gastric cancer and its treatment options. Despite the development of chemotherapy and multimodal treatment options during the last decades, mortality remains high worldwide. After refreshing important epidemiological considerations, the molecular mechanisms currently accepted through which PM occurs are revised. Palliative chemotherapy is the only recommended treatment option for patients with PM of gastric cancer according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, although cytoreductive surgery in combination with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy demonstrated promising results in selected patients with regional PM and localized intraabdominal tumor spread. A novel treatment named pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy may have a promising future in improving overall survival with an acceptable postoperative complication rate and stabilizing quality of life during treatment. Additionally, the procedure has been proved to be safe for the patient and medical personnel and a feasible, repeatable method to deter metastatic proliferation. This overview comprehensively addresses this novel and promising treatment in the context of a scientifically and clinically challenging disease.
Collapse
|
13
|
Smith ME, Nathan H. Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Safety Is Only Half of the Story. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e186839. [PMID: 30646199 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret E Smith
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Hari Nathan
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Königsrainer A, Rau B. Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic IntraPeritoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC): don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. Pleura Peritoneum 2018; 3:20180131. [PMID: 30911670 PMCID: PMC6405014 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2018-0131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alfred Königsrainer
- Klinik für Allgemeine, Viszteral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler Str. 3 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Beate Rau
- Department of Surgery Charité, Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|