1
|
Hill SR, Gibson A, Oluboyede Y, Longworth L, Bennett B, Shaw JW. A Methodological Study to Compare Alternative Modes of Administration With Value EQ-5D Using Preference-Elicitation Techniques. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024; 27:784-793. [PMID: 38467189 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Time trade-off (TTO) and discrete choice experiment (DCE) preference-elicitation techniques can be administered using face-to-face interviews (F2F), unassisted online (UO) surveys, or remote-assisted (RA) interviews. The objective of this study was to explore how the mode of administration affects the quality and reliability of preference-elicitation data. METHODS EQ-5D-5L health states were valued using composite TTO (cTTO) and DCE approaches by the UK general population. Participants were allocated to 1 of 2 study groups. Group A completed both F2F and UO surveys (n = 271), and group B completed both RA and UO surveys (n = 223). The feasibility of survey completion and the reliability and face-validity of data collected were compared across all modes of administration. RESULTS Fewer participants reported receiving sufficient guidance on the cTTO tasks during the UO survey compared with the 2 assisted modes. Participants across all modes typically reported receiving sufficient guidance on the DCE tasks. cTTO data were less reliable from the UO survey compared with both assisted modes, but there were no differences in DCE data reliability. cTTO data from all modes demonstrated face-validity; however, the UO survey produced higher utilities for moderate and severe health states than both assisted modes. Both F2F and RA modes provided comparably reliable data. CONCLUSIONS The reliability of DCE data is not affected by the mode of administration. Interviewer-assisted modes of administration (F2F or RA) yield more reliable cTTO data than unassisted surveys. Both F2F and RA surveys produced similar-quality data.
Collapse
|
2
|
Liao M, Yang Z, Rand K, Luo N. Testing "Pits" Time Trade-Off: Can Data Quality be Improved by Removing Death From Valuation of Health States? VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024:S1098-3015(24)02369-6. [PMID: 38795961 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Composite time trade-off (cTTO) often exhibits issues such as a value clustering at -1, potentially due to suboptimal valuation task design. We developed a novel time trade-off which uses the "pits" state as an anchor state and enables a unified time trade-off procedure for all health states (referred to as "pTTO"). This study aimed to test the pTTO for valuation of EQ-5D-5L health states. METHODS A total of 120 members of the general public were invited to value 3 pairs of dominant/dominated EQ-5D-5L states using both cTTO and pTTO and the "pits" state using cTTO. We compared the pTTO with cTTO in terms of feasibility (interviewer-rated task-completing difficulty), acceptability (participant-reported task experience), value distribution, logical consistency, and discriminatory ability (using the standardized response mean, an effect size measure, derived from 3 pairwise comparisons of states with dominant/dominated relationship). RESULTS The pTTO demonstrated similar feasibility to cTTO but slightly lower acceptability. The pTTO values exhibited a smoother and more continuous distribution compared with cTTO values. Relative to the cTTO, the pTTO showed higher individual-level logical consistency rate for the pairs comprising severe states (stringent criterion: 53.04% vs 17.39%; less stringent criterion: 82.61% vs 78.26%). The standardized response mean value based on pTTO values were higher than those based on cTTO values for the pair comprising severe states (0.388 vs -0.140). CONCLUSIONS The pTTO appeared to be feasible and acceptable to value EQ-5D-5L states. The pTTO values were less clustered, more logically consistent, and discriminative compared with the cTTO values for severe health states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meixia Liao
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Zhihao Yang
- Health Services Management Department, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, China
| | - Kim Rand
- Health Services Research Center, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway; Maths in Health B.V., Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nan Luo
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Varriale C, Andrulli G, Meregaglia M, Rencz F, Finch AP. Behind the Scenes: A Qualitative Investigation of Interviewers' Performance in EQ-5D Valuation Studies. PHARMACOECONOMICS - OPEN 2024; 8:389-401. [PMID: 38592657 PMCID: PMC11058132 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-024-00486-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The EuroQol Valuation Technology (EQ-VT) protocol is currently employed by the valuation studies of the EQ family of instruments worldwide. To date, all the evidence in support of the quality control (QC) originates from quantitative indicators. OBJECTIVE We aimed to explore interviewers' conversational patterns in EQ-VT interviews, beyond quantitative QC indicators, and to provide a preliminary exploration of how the interaction between interviewer and respondent impacts data quality. METHODS Two researchers transcribed and independently coded 24 video-recorded interviews from the Italian EQ-5D-5L valuation study, adopting the conversational analysis framework. The analysis identified positive and negative 'patterns' of conversational practice. These were categorized into themes and sub-themes and were used to score a random sample of 42 video-recorded interviews conducted at different time points by seven interviewers. RESULTS The conversational analysis identified 20 positive and 14 negative interview patterns, which were grouped into two main themes (i.e., task execution and communication skills). Positive items included appending questions that stimulated respondents' engagement, providing different explanations for an unclear aspect, supporting the participant with useful information for completing the tasks, and increasing the interview's coherence by confirming the respondent answers. Negative patterns included moving forward in the exercise without making sure that the respondent understood, trying to force an answer from the respondent, speaking too fast, and providing incomplete or incorrect explanations of the task. Most interviewers exhibited a moderate increase in positive patterns or a decrease in negative patterns over time. A certain degree of consistency between the quantitative QC results and the qualitative scoring deriving from the interviewer-respondent interaction was observed, with the best and worst performers of the qualitative scoring showing good and bad scores on key QC items, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The identified positive and negative patterns may be useful to inform the training material of EQ-VT studies worldwide and complement the existing QC process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Fanni Rencz
- Department of Health Policy, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Aureliano Paolo Finch
- EuroQol Office, EuroQol Research Foundation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Health Values Research and Consultancy, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Robinson T, Hill S, Orozco-Leal G, Kernohan A, King W, Oluboyede Y. Valuing selected WAItE health states using the Time Trade-Off methodology: findings from an online interviewer-assisted remote survey. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2024; 8:6. [PMID: 38214796 PMCID: PMC10786771 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-023-00674-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Weight-Specific Adolescent Instrument for Economic Evaluation (WAItE) is a physical weight-specific patient reported outcome measure for use in adolescence. The purpose of this study was to use the Time Trade-Off (TTO) methodology, administered using an online interviewer-assisted remote survey, to obtain utility values for several health states from the WAItE descriptive system from a sample of the UK adult general population. METHODS The adult sample was gathered using a market research company and a sample of local residents. All participants completed the same interviewer-assisted remote survey, which included rating WAItE states of varying impairment using the TTO. RESULTS 42 adults completed the survey. Utility values were gathered for four health states, ranging from low impairment to the most severe health from the WAItE descriptive system (the Pits state). Consistent orderings of the WAItE health states were observed; the health state with the lowest level of impairment was valued highest and the Pits state was valued lowest. Several respondents (n = 7, 17%) considered the Pits state to be worse than death; however, the mean value of this health state was 0.23. CONCLUSIONS The utility value of the Pits state relative to death generated from this study will be used to anchor latent values for WAItE health states generated from a Discrete Choice Experiment onto the 0 = death, 1 = full health Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) scale as part of a valuation study for the WAItE in the UK population. This study also provides further evidence that interviewer-assisted digital studies are feasible for collecting TTO data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomos Robinson
- Health Economics Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
| | | | - Giovany Orozco-Leal
- Health Economics Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Ashleigh Kernohan
- Health Economics Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - William King
- Health Economics Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bray N, Tudor Edwards R, Schneider P. Development of a value-based scoring system for the MobQoL-7D: a novel tool for measuring quality-adjusted life years in the context of mobility impairment. Disabil Rehabil 2024:1-10. [PMID: 38206178 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2297929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To create a preference-based value set scoring system for the MobQoL-7D outcome measure, and to examine differences in the health state preferences of the general population and individuals with impaired mobility. METHODS AND MATERIALS A preference elicitation study was undertaken to ascribe utility weights to all health states (i.e., all unique combination of answers) described by the MobQoL-7D. The elicitation exercise was developed using the Online Elicitation of Personal Utility Functions (OPUF) tool. Two UK sample groups were recruited; firstly a representative general population sample (N = 504), secondly a balanced sample of individuals with impaired mobility (N = 368). Distinct preference-based value sets were developed for each sample. Differences in dimension ranking, weighting, and overall utility values were assessed. RESULTS The general population sample considered most health states, especially the more severe states, to be worse than the mobility impaired sample comparatively. Statistically significant differences between the samples were observed in four of the seven MobQoL-7D dimensions. CONCLUSIONS This study is the first to provide preference-based value sets for the MobQoL-7D, ready for use in economic evaluations, QALY calculation, and other clinical or research applications. The study demonstrates how the general public and individuals with impaired mobility value health states differently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Bray
- Academy for Health Equity, Prevention and Wellbeing (AHEPW), School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Rhiannon Tudor Edwards
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation (CHEME), School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Paul Schneider
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Matza LS, Stewart KD, Redig J, Howell TA, Morris W, Newson RS, Yasui A, Ishak J, Boye KS. Health state utilities associated with weight loss: preferences of people with type 2 diabetes and obesity in Japan. J Med Econ 2024; 27:370-380. [PMID: 38347819 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2316400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Health state utilities associated with weight change are needed for cost-utility analyses (CUAs) examining the value of treatments for type 2 diabetes and obesity. Previous studies have estimated the utility benefits associated with various amounts of weight reduction in the US and Europe, but preferences for weight change in Asian cultures may differ from these published values. The purpose of this study was to estimate utilities associated with reductions in body weight based on preferences of individuals with type 2 diabetes and obesity in Japan. METHODS Health state vignettes represented type 2 diabetes with respondents' own current weight and weight reductions of 2.5%, 5%, 7.5%, 10%, 12.5%, 15%, and 20%. Utilities were elicited in time trade-off interviews with a sample of respondents in Japan with type 2 diabetes and body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2 (the cutoff for obesity in Japan). RESULTS Analyses were conducted with data from 138 respondents (84.8% male; mean age = 58.0 years; mean BMI = 29.4 kg/m2) from all eight regions of Japan. Utility gains gradually increased with rising percentage of weight reductions ranging from 2.5% to 15%. Weight reductions of 2.5% to 15% resulted in utility increases of 0.013 to 0.048. The health state representing a 20% weight reduction yielded a wide range of preferences (mean utility increase of 0.044). Equations are recommended for estimating utility change based on any percentage of weight reduction (up to 20%) in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes and obesity. LIMITATIONS This study was conducted in a sample with limited representation of patients with BMI >35 kg/m2 (n = 13) and relatively few women (n = 21). CONCLUSION Results may be used to provide inputs for CUAs examining the value of treatments that are associated with weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity in Japan.
Collapse
|
7
|
Rowen D, Mukuria C, Bray N, Carlton J, Cooper S, Longworth L, Meads D, O'Neill C, Yang Y. UK Valuation of EQ-5D-5L, a Generic Measure of Health-Related Quality of Life: A Study Protocol. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:1625-1635. [PMID: 37722593 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A high-quality and widely accepted UK EQ-5D-5L value set is urgently required to enable the latest version of EQ-5D scored using recent UK public preferences to inform policy including health technology assessments submitted to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. This article outlines the study protocol for the generation of a new EQ-5D-5L UK value set. METHODS Twelve hundred interviews will be undertaken using the composite time trade-off elicitation technique for 102 health states (86 from the international EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol, plus 16 with best predictive performance in an extended design used in the Native American EQ-5D-5L valuation). The sample will be UK adults (age ≥18 years) proportionately representative across England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland, representative for age, sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic group, with inclusion of participants with/without health problems. Participants will choose to be interviewed via videoconference (by Zoom) or in-person in a central venue. Data quality will be rigorously assessed. RESULTS The value set will be generated using tobit random effects and heteroscedastic tobit models (with censoring at -1) using all data, excluding time trade-off values highlighted by participants as ones they would reconsider and data from interviewers failing protocol compliance. Quality and acceptance will be achieved by public involvement, regular Steering Group meetings, independent assessment of data quality at 4 time points, and final endorsement of data and analyses. CONCLUSION This study will produce a UK value set for the EQ-5D-5L for use in prospective and retrospective data sets containing EQ-5D-5L data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna Rowen
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.
| | - Clara Mukuria
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Nathan Bray
- Academy for Health Equity, Prevention and Wellbeing, Bangor University, Bangor, Wales, UK
| | - Jill Carlton
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Sophie Cooper
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, England, UK
| | | | - David Meads
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK
| | - Ciaran O'Neill
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland; National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Yaling Yang
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Begum R, Crott R, Martina R, Loizidou EM, Khan I. Estimating health related quality of life effects in vitiligo. Mapping EQ-5D-5 L utilities from vitiligo specific scales: VNS, VitiQoL and re-pigmentation measures using data from the HI-Light trial. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2023; 21:85. [PMID: 37563643 PMCID: PMC10413598 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-023-02172-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vitiligo is reported to affect 2% of the world's population and has a significant impact on health related quality of life (HRQoL). The relationship between HRQoL and clinical outcomes used in vitiligo require further examination. Mapping condition specific measures of HRQoL: vitiligo specific quality of life instrument (VitiQoL), vitiligo noticeability scale (VNS) and vitiligo re-pigmentation scores (RPS) to the EQ-5D have not yet been reported. METHODS Data collected from a randomised clinical trial (HI-Light) in vitiligo was used to develop mapping algorithms for the EQ-5D-5 L and the relationship between HRQoL, clinical outcomes and EQ-5D were investigated. Two EQ-5D-5 L value sets (Van Hout and Alava) using linear and non-linear models were considered. Logistic regression models were used to model the probability of vitiligo noticeability (VNS) in terms of RPS, EQ-5D and VitiQoL scores. RESULTS Mapping from RPS appeared to perform better followed by VNS for the Alava crosswalks using polynomial models: Mean observed vs. predicted utilities of 0.9008 (0.005) vs. 0.8984 (0.0004) were observed for RPS. For VNS, mean observed vs. predicted utilities of 0.9008 (0.005) vs. 0.8939 (0.0003) were observed. For VitiQoL, mean observed vs. predicted utilities of 0.9008 (0.005) vs. 0.8912 (0.0002) were observed. For patients with the least re-pigmentation (RPS < 25%), a Total VitiQoL score of about 20 points gives around an 18% chance of vitiligo being no longer or a lot less noticeable. CONCLUSION The algorithm based on RPS followed by VNS performed best. The relationship between effects from vitiligo specific HRQoL instruments and clinical RPS was established allowing for plausible clinically relevant differences to be identified, although further work is required in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rabiah Begum
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
| | - Ralph Crott
- IRSS, Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, 1200, Belgium
| | | | - Eleni M Loizidou
- Biobank.cy, Center of Excellence in Biobanking and Biomedical Research, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Iftekhar Khan
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mukuria C, Peasgood T, McDool E, Norman R, Rowen D, Brazier J. Valuing the EQ Health and Wellbeing Short Using Time Trade-Off and a Discrete Choice Experiment: A Feasibility Study. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:1073-1084. [PMID: 36805577 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The EQ Health and Wellbeing Short (EQ-HWB-S) is a new generic measure that covers health and wellbeing developed for use in economic evaluation in health and social care. The aim was to test the feasibility of using composite time trade-off (cTTO) and a discrete choice experiment (DCE) based on an international protocol to derive utilities for the EQ-HWB-S and to generate a pilot value set. METHODS A representative UK general population was recruited. Online videoconference interviews were undertaken where cTTO and DCE tasks were administered using EuroQol Portable Valuation Technology. Quality control (QC) was used to assess interviewers' performance. Data were modeled using Tobit, probit, and hybrid models. Feasibility was assessed based on the distribution of data, participants, and reports of understanding from the interviewer, QC and modeling results. RESULTS cTTO and DCE data were available for 520 participants. Demographic characteristics were broadly representative of the UK general population. Interviewers met QC requirements. cTTO values ranged between -1 to 1 with increasing disutility associated with more severe states. Participants understood the tasks and the EQ-HWB-S states; and the interviewers reported high levels of understanding and engagement. The hybrid Tobit heteroscedastic model was selected for the pilot value set with values ranging from -0.384 to 1. Pain, mobility, daily activities, and sad/depressed had the largest disutilities, followed by loneliness, anxiety, exhaustion, control, and cognition in the selected model. CONCLUSIONS EQ-HWB-S can be valued using cTTO and DCE. Further methodological work is recommended to develop a valuation protocol specific to the EQ-HWB-S.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.
| | - Tessa Peasgood
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Emily McDool
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Richard Norman
- Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - John Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang H, Rowen DL, Brazier JE, Jiang L. Discrete Choice Experiments in Health State Valuation: A Systematic Review of Progress and New Trends. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2023; 21:405-418. [PMID: 36997744 PMCID: PMC10062300 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00794-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are increasingly used in health state valuation studies. OBJECTIVE This systematic review updates the progress and new findings of DCE studies in the health state valuation, covering the period since the review of June 2018 to November 2022. The review reports the methods that are currently being used in DCE studies to value health and study design characteristics, and, for the first time, reviews DCE health state valuation studies published in the Chinese language. METHODS English language databases PubMed and Cochrane, and Chinese language databases Wanfang and CNKI were searched using the self-developed search terms. Health state valuation or methodology study papers were included if the study used DCE data to generate a value set for a preference-based measure. Key information extracted included DCE study design strategies applied, methods for anchoring the latent coefficient on to a 0-1 QALY scale and data analysis methods. RESULTS Sixty-five studies were included; one Chinese language publication and 64 English language publications. The number of health state valuation studies using DCE has rapidly increased in recent years and these have been conducted in more countries than prior to 2018. Wide usage of DCE with duration attributes, D-efficient design and models accounting for heterogeneity has continued in recent years. Although more methodological consensus has been found than in studies conducted prior to 2018, this consensus may be driven by valuation studies for common measures with an international protocol (the 'model' valuation research). Valuing long measures with well-being attributes attracted attention and more realistic design strategies (e.g., inconstant time preference, efficient design and implausible states design) were identified. However, more qualitative and quantitative methodology study is still necessary to evaluate the effect of those new methods. CONCLUSIONS The use of DCEs in health state valuation continues to grow dramatically and the methodology progress makes the method more reliable and pragmatic. However, study design is driven by international protocols and method selection is not always justified. There is no gold standard for DCE design, presentation format or anchoring method. More qualitative and quantitative methodology study is recommended to evaluate the effect of new methods before researchers make methodology decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haode Wang
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, 30 Regent St, Sheffield City Centre, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Donna L Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, 30 Regent St, Sheffield City Centre, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - John E Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, 30 Regent St, Sheffield City Centre, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Litian Jiang
- Health Policy Research Unit, Shenzhen Health Development Research and Data Management Center, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Peasgood T, Bourke M, Devlin N, Rowen D, Yang Y, Dalziel K. Randomised comparison of online interviews versus face-to-face interviews to value health states. Soc Sci Med 2023; 323:115818. [PMID: 36940582 PMCID: PMC9993735 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Health state valuation studies using composite time trade-off (cTTO) interviews have historically been conducted face-to-face. The COVID-19 pandemic forced disruptive innovation meaning a number of valuation studies conducted interviews via videoconference. These studies found online interviews feasible and acceptable; however, studies were not constructed to test the impact of online versus face-to-face interviews. This study builds on its sister study from the UK and aims to assess the acceptability and equivalence of in person face-to-face interviews with online interviews on cTTO valuation outcomes and on data quality. METHODS Participants were recruited into a randomised equivalence study via an external research company. Consenting participants were randomly allocated to complete a cTTO interview face-to-face or online, using the same 10 EQ-5D-5L health states. Mean and distribution of the cTTO values, participant understanding, data quality, demographic characteristics, participant preference, participant engagement and participant feedback were all compared across interview mode. Statistical equivalence for cTTO values for each state was tested using two one-sided t-tests by mode. Finally, regression analysis was completed to assess the impacts of interview mode on cTTO value while controlling for demographic characteristics of the participants. RESULTS Mean cTTO values were shown to be equivalent for mild health states and showed no significant difference for serious health states. The proportion of individuals who expressed an interest in the study but declined to arrange an interview after finding out their randomisation was significantly higher for the face-to-face (21.6%) than the online group (1.8%). No significant difference was found between groups for participant engagement, understanding or feedback nor for any indicators of data quality. CONCLUSION Administrating interviews face to face or online did not appear to have a statistically significant impact on mean cTTO values. Offering both online and face-to-face interviews routinely allows all participants to select the most convenient option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Peasgood
- Health Economics Unit, Centre for Health Policy | Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Mackenzie Bourke
- Health Economics Unit, Centre for Health Policy | Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nancy Devlin
- Health Economics Unit, Centre for Health Policy | Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Yaling Yang
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Kim Dalziel
- Health Economics Unit, Centre for Health Policy | Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Roudijk B, Sajjad A, Essers B, Lipman S, Stalmeier P, Finch AP. A Value Set for the EQ-5D-Y-3L in the Netherlands. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2022; 40:193-203. [PMID: 36216977 PMCID: PMC9549846 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01192-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE There is increasing interest in preference-accompanied measures of health for paediatric populations. The child-friendly EQ-5D version, EQ-5D-Y-3L, is one such instrument, but the lack of a Dutch value set prevents its use in economic evaluations of healthcare interventions in the Netherlands. This study aims at covering this gap by collecting preferences using a standardised protocol for deriving EQ-5D-Y-3L value sets. METHODS Composite time trade-off data were collected using videoconferencing interviews, with each respondent completing ten composite time trade-off tasks. Discrete choice experiment data were collected using an online survey, with respondents each completing 15 paired comparisons. Respondents completed these tasks considering what they prefer for a hypothetical 10-year-old child. Discrete choice experiment data were analysed using a ten-parameter mixed-logit model and anchored to the quality-adjusted life-year scale using the mean observed composite time trade-off values. RESULTS The study collected preferences for 197 respondents using composite time trade-off and for 959 respondents using a discrete choice experiment. The discrete choice experiment sample was representative for the Dutch population in terms of age and sex. The level 3 weight for pain/discomfort was the largest, followed by feeling worried, sad or unhappy, usual activities, mobility and self-care. Health state values ranged between -0.218 and 1. CONCLUSIONS This study generated a Dutch value set for the EQ-5D-Y-3L, which can be used for the computation of quality-adjusted life-years for economic evaluations of healthcare interventions in paediatric populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bram Roudijk
- EuroQol Research Foundation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Ayesha Sajjad
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Brigitte Essers
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Lipman
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peep Stalmeier
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lipman SA, Essers BAB, Finch AP, Sajjad A, Stalmeier PFM, Roudijk B. In a Child's Shoes: Composite Time Trade-Off Valuations for EQ-5D-Y-3L with Different Proxy Perspectives. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2022; 40:181-192. [PMID: 36255560 PMCID: PMC9579618 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01202-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES EQ-5D-Y-3L health states are commonly valued by asking adults to complete stated preference tasks, 'given their views about a 10-year-old child' (hereafter referred to as proxy 1). The use of this perspective has been a source of debate. In this paper, we investigated an alternative proxy perspective: i.e. adults considered what they think a 10-year old-child would decide for itself (hereafter, proxy 2 (substitute)]. Our main objective was to explore how the outcomes, dispersion and response patterns of a composite time trade-off valuation differ between proxy 1 and proxy 2. METHODS A team of four trained interviewers completed 402 composite time trade-off interviews following the EQ-5D-Y-3L protocol. Respondents were randomly allocated to value health states in either the proxy 1 or proxy 2 (substitute) perspective. Each respondent valued ten health states with the perspective they were assigned to, as well as one health state with the alternative perspective (33333). RESULTS The use of different proxy perspectives yielded differences in EQ-5D-Y-3L valuation. For states in which children had considerable pain and were very worried, sad or unhappy, respondents' valuations were lower in proxy 1 than in proxy 2 (substitute) perspectives, by about 0.2. Within-subject variation across health states was lower for proxy 2 (substitute) than proxy 1 perspectives. Analyses of response patterns suggest that data for proxy 2 (substitute) perspectives were less clustered. CONCLUSIONS There are systematic differences between composite time trade-off responses given by adults deciding for children and adults considering what children would want for themselves. In addition to warranting further qualitative exploration, such differences contribute to the ongoing normative discussion surrounding the source and perspective used for valuation of child and adolescent health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan A Lipman
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Brigitte A B Essers
- CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ayesha Sajjad
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peep F M Stalmeier
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bram Roudijk
- EuroQol Research Foundation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|