Hypertrophy of the anterior arch of the atlas associated with congenital nonunion of the posterior arch: a retrospective case-control study

Maximum Safety Limits of Laminectomy of the C1 Vertebra for Chiari Malformation Surgery: A Finite Element Analysis

Background

The treatment of Chiari malformations generally consists of posterior fossa decompression. C1 laminectomy is required in selected cases. However, cases of iatrogenic anterior arch fractures at C1 without high-energy trauma have been reported. Developing theoretical models of atlas C1 bones that have undergone a laminectomy can help researchers identify the regions where fractures may occur as a result of sudden loads.

Methods

In this study, we created a detailed three-dimensional solid finite element model of the human atlas bone (C1) using geometric data. The loadings of the laminectomy dimension were evaluated on the basis of three groups. Group I comprised atlas bones that had not undergone a laminectomy. For Group II, the lateral border of the laminectomy was determined as the projection of the lateral mass medial border on the lamina. For Group III, the bilateral sulcus arteriosus was determined as the border for the lateral border of the laminectomy. The analysis results, which are in good agreement with those of previous reports, showed high concentrations of localized stress in the anterior and posterior arches of the atlas bone.

Results

The analysis results showed that the stress increased in the laminectomy models. The maximum stress observed was consistent with the clinical observations of fracture sites in previous studies.

Conclusion

In the treatment of patients with Chiari malformations, C1 laminectomy is often required. The width of this laminectomy can lead to iatrogenic anterior arch fractures. This is the first study to evaluate C1 laminectomy width using finite element modeling.

Krapina atlases suggest a high prevalence of anatomical variations in the first cervical vertebra of Neanderthals

The first cervical vertebra, atlas, and its anatomical variants have been widely studied in Homo sapiens. However, in Neanderthals, the presence of anatomical variants of the atlas has been very little studied until very recently. Only the Neanderthal group from the El Sidrón site (Spain) has been analysed with regard to the anatomical variants of the atlas. A high prevalence of anatomical variants has been described in this sample, which points to low genetic diversity in this Neanderthal group. Even so, the high prevalence of anatomical variations detected in El Sidrón Neanderthal atlases needs to be confirmed by analysing more Neanderthal remains. In this context, we analysed the possible presence of anatomical variants in the three Neanderthal atlases recovered from the Krapina site (Croatia) within the Neanderthal lineage. Two of the three Krapina atlases presented anatomical variations. One atlas (Krapina 98) had an unclosed transverse foramen and the other (Krapina 99) presented a non-fused anterior atlas arch. Moreover, an extended review of the bibliography also showed these anatomical variations in other Middle and Upper Pleistocene hominins, leading us to hypothesise that anatomical variations of the atlas had a higher prevalence in extinct hominins than in modern humans.

Prevalence of anatomic variations of the atlas vertebra

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The retrotransverse foramen (RTF), arcuate foramen (AF), unclosed transverse foramen (UTF) and posterior atlas arch defects (PAAD) are anatomic variations of the atlas vertebra that surgeons must be aware of before spine surgery is performed.

PURPOSE

To analyze the prevalence of the AF, RTF, UTF, and PAAD.

STUDY DESIGN

Ex-vivo anatomical study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Two hundred eighteen atlas vertebrae obtained from 100 Caucasian subjects and 118 sub-Saharan African subjects (48 Sotho subjects, 35 Xhosa subjects and 35 Zulu subjects).

METHODS

We studied 218 atlas vertebrae from skeletons of the Raymond A. Dart Collection in order to analyze the prevalence of AF, RTF, UTF, and PAAD in both Caucasian and sub-Saharan African subjects.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Not applicable.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine (31.2%) atlases presented anatomical variants: 64 (29.3%) presented one anatomical variant, 4 (1.8%) presented two, and 1 (0.5%) presented three. AF, RTF, UTF, Type A and Type E defects were present in 35 (16.1%), 17 (7.8%), 17 (7.8%), 5 (2.3%), and 1 (0.5%) vertebrae, respectively. The vertebrae with two anatomical variants presented a bilateral UTF and a Type A defect, a bilateral AF and a Type A defect, a right UTF and a left AF, and a right UTF and a Type E defect. The vertebra with three anatomical variants presented a bilateral RTF, a left UTF, and a left AF. No sex differences in prevalence of the RTF (p=.775), AF (p=.605), UTF (p=.408) and Type A defects (p=1.000) were found in the sub-Saharan African and Caucasian groups (RTF, p=.306; AF, p=.346; UTF, p=.121; Type A defects, p=.561). Comparison between the sub-Saharan African (all subjects) and the Caucasian group revealed no differences in the UTF (p=.105), AF (p=.144), RTF (p=.542) and Type A defects (p=.521) prevalence. Also, no differences in the prevalence of the UTF (p=.515), AF (p=.278), and RTF (p=.857) between Zulu, Xhosa and Sotho subjects were found. Neither were found sex differences in the prevalence of UTF, RTF and AF in Zulu (p=.805, p=.234, p=.129), Xhosa (p=.269, p=.181, p=.309), and Sotho subjects (p=.062, p=.590, p=.106).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study has revealed no sex differences in the prevalence of AF, UTF, RTF or PAAD in both Caucasian and sub-Saharan African subjects. This research has also indicated no differences in the prevalence of the UTF, AF and RTF between Zulu, Xhosa and Sotho subjects. In addition, this study has revealed no differences in the Type A, UTF, AF, and RTF prevalence between the sub-Saharan African (all subjects) and the Caucasian subjects. These variations may be known by surgeons before spine surgery for better planning.

Shape change in the atlas with congenital midline non-union of its posterior arch: a morphometric geometric study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The congenital midline non-union of the posterior arch of the atlas is a developmental variant present at a frequency ranging from 0.7% to 3.9%. Most of the reported cases correspond to incidental findings during routine medical examination. In cases of posterior non-union, hypertrophy of the anterior arch and cortical bone thickening of the posterior arches have been observed and interpreted as adaptive responses of the atlas to increased mechanical stress.

PURPOSE

We sought to determine if the congenital non-union of the posterior arch results in a change in the shape of the atlas.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This study is an analysis of the first cervical vertebrae from osteological collections through morphometric geometric techniques.

METHODS

A total of 21 vertebrae were scanned with a high-resolution three-dimensional scanner (Artec Space Spider, Artec Group, Luxembourg). To capture vertebral shape, 19 landmarks and 100 semilandmarks were placed on the vertebrae. Procrustes superimposition was applied to obtain size and shape data (MorphoJ 1.02; Klingenberg, 2011), which were analyzed through principal component analysis (PCA) and mean shape comparisons.

RESULTS

The PCA resulted in two components explaining 22.32% and 18.8% of the total shape variance. The graphic plotting of both components indicates a clear shape difference between the control atlas and the atlas with posterior non-union. This observation was supported by statistically significant differences in mean shape comparisons between both types of vertebra (p<.0001). Changes in shape were observed in the superior and inferior articular facets, the transverse processes, and the neural canal between the control and non-union vertebrae.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-union of the posterior arch of the atlas is associated with significant changes in the shape of the vertebra.

Spontaneous anterior arch fracture of the atlas following C1 laminectomy without fusion: A report of three cases and finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

Only four cases of anterior arch fracture after C1 laminectomy without fusion have been previously reported. Although atlas fractures commonly occur in response to high-energy trauma, no obvious trauma that could cause the fracture was observed in these reported cases. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the biomechanical mechanism of anterior arch fracture of the atlas following C1 laminectomy and present three cases of this fracture.

METHODS

Three cases of fracture of the anterior arch of the atlas following C1 laminectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Three atlas models (an intact model, a laminectomy model, and a transverse ligament-resected model) were created from computed tomography data of each case using a three-dimensional finite element method. Axial load was applied on the superior facet to mimic four conditions (neutral, flexion, extension, lateral bending). The distribution of von Mises stress in the anterior arch and the displacement of the posterior arch were compared among the three models.

RESULTS

In all three cases, the anterior arch fracture clinically occurred after C1 laminectomy despite there being no obvious inciting trauma. During the finite element analysis, increased stress was observed in all postures of the laminectomy model as compared with the intact model. The stress-concentrated location observed in the finite element model was consistent with the fracture sites that were clinically observed. In terms of loading condition, much higher stress was observed in extension and lateral bending as compared with other postures. There were no significant differences in stress distribution between the laminectomy model and the transverse ligament-resected laminectomy model.

CONCLUSIONS

Stress distribution concentrates in the anterior arch after C1 laminectomy, leading to fracture of the anterior arch despite no inciting trauma. There may be more frequent occult fractures observed after C1 laminectomy than has been reported. Therefore, surgeons should recognize anterior arch fracture as a possible complication of C1 laminectomy without fusion.

Possible Further Evidence of Low Genetic Diversity in the El Sidrón (Asturias, Spain) Neandertal Group: Congenital Clefts of the Atlas

We present here the first cases in Neandertals of congenital clefts of the arch of the atlas. Two atlases from El Sidrón, northern Spain, present respectively a defect of the posterior (frequency in extant modern human populations ranging from 0.73% to 3.84%), and anterior (frequency in extant modern human populations ranging from 0.087% to 0.1%) arch, a condition in most cases not associated with any clinical manifestation. The fact that two out of three observable atlases present a low frequency congenital condition, together with previously reported evidence of retained deciduous mandibular canine in two out of ten dentitions from El Sidrón, supports the previous observation based on genetic evidence that these Neandertals constituted a group with close genetic relations. Some have proposed for humans and other species that the presence of skeletal congenital conditions, although without clinical significance, could be used as a signal of endogamy or inbreeding. In the present case this interpretation would fit the general scenario of high incidence of rare conditions among Pleistocene humans and the specific scenariothat emerges from Neandertal paleogenetics, which points to long-term small and decreasing population size with reduced and isolated groups. Adverse environmental factors affecting early pregnancies would constitute an alternative, non-exclusive, explanation for a high incidence of congenital conditions. Further support or rejection of these interpretations will come from new genetic and skeletal evidence from Neandertal remains.