Predicting intraoperative feasibility of combined TES-mMEP and cSSEP monitoring during scoliosis surgery based on preoperative neurophysiological assessment

Intraoperative Monitoring of Scoliosis Surgery in Young Patients

SUMMARY

Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring has added substantially to the safety of spinal deformity surgery correction since its introduction over four decades ago. Monitoring routinely includes both somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials. Either modality alone will detect almost all instances of spinal cord injury during deformity correction. The combined use of the two modalities provides complementary information, can permit more rapidly identification of problems, and enhances safety though parallel redundancy should one modality fail. Both techniques are well established and continue to be refined. Although there is room for provider preference, proper monitoring requires attention to technical detail, understanding of the underlying physiology, and familiarity with effects of commonly used anesthetic agents.

The prediction of intraoperative cervical cord function changes by different motor evoked potentials phenotypes in cervical myelopathy patients

Background

Surgery is usually the treatment of choice for patients with cervical compressive myelopathy (CCM). Motor evoked potential (MEP) has proved to be helpful tool in evaluating intraoperative cervical spinal cord function change of those patients. This study aims to describe and evaluate different MEP baseline phenotypes for predicting MEP changes during CCM surgery.

Methods

A total of 105 consecutive CCM patients underwent posterior cervical spine decompression were prospectively collected between December 2012 and November 2016. All intraoperative MEP baselines recorded before spinal cord decompression were classified into 5 types (I to V) that were carefully designed according to the different MEP parameters. The postoperative neurologic status of each patient was assessed immediately after surgery.

Results

The mean intraoperative MEP changes range were 10.2% ± 5.8, 14.7% ± 9.2, 54.8% ± 31.9, 74.1% ± 24.3, and 110% ± 40 in Type I, II, III, IV, and V, respectively. There was a significant correlation of the intraoperative MEP change rate with different MEP baseline phenotypes (r = 0.84, P < 0.01). Postoperative transient new spinal deficits were found 0/31 case in Type I, 0/21 in Type II, 1/14 in Type III, 2/24 in Type IV, and 4/15 in Type V. No permanent neurological injury was found in our cases series.

Conclusions

The MEP baselines categories for predicting intraoperative cervical cord function change is proposed through this work. The more serious the MEP baseline abnormality, the higher the probability of intraoperative MEP changes, which is beneficial to early warning for the cervical cord injury.

Multimodal Surgical Treatment of High-Grade Gliomas in the Motor Area: The Impact of the Combination of Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Fluorescein-Guided Resection

BACKGROUND

Fluorescein-guided surgery of high-grade gliomas (HGGs) increases the extent of tumor resection but its efficacy has been questioned, especially for tumors located close to functional networks. In these cases, navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) may be used to plan and guide a safe resection. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of these techniques combined with intraoperative neurophysiologic mapping (IONM) to achieve the maximal safe resection of tumors located in the motor area.

METHODS

We collected data of patients operated using a multimodal combination of sodium fluorescein-guided resection, nTMS motor planning, and IONM for HGGs in the motor area. The nTMS planning accuracy, extent of resection, and postoperative motor and functional status were compared with a matched control group of patients with HGG operated on only by IONM-guided resection.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients treated by multimodal approach (group A) and 41 controls (group B) were included. The nTMS-based planning reliably identified the tumor/motor pathway spatial relationship (accuracy, 92.68%). We obtained in group A versus controls a higher gross total resection rate (73.17% vs. 51.22%; P = 0.04), and a reduction of cases with new permanent motor deficits (9.75% vs. 29.27%; P = 0.04) or Karnofsky Performance Status worsening (12.19% vs. 31.71%; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the role of the combination of sodium fluorescein-guided resection and nTMS-based planning for surgery of HGGs close to the motor pathway. This multimodal approach in combination with IONM may lead to customized preoperative planning, increased extent of resection, and improved functional outcome, compared with standard IONM-guided surgery.

Perils of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring: analysis of "false-negative" results in spine surgeries

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Although some authors have published case reports describing false negatives in intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM), a systematic review of causes of false-negative IONM results is lacking.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to analyze false-negative IONM findings in spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort analysis.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A cohort of 109 patients with new postoperative neurologic deficits was analyzed for possible false-negative IONM reporting.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The causes of false-negative IONM reporting were determined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From a cohort of 62,038 monitored spine surgeries, 109 consecutive patients with new postoperative neurologic deficits were reviewed for IONM alarms.

RESULTS

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring alarms occurred in 87 of 109 surgeries. Nineteen patients with new postoperative neurologic deficits did not have an IONM alarm and surgeons were not warned. In addition, three patients had no interpretable IONM baseline data and no alarms were possible for the duration of the surgery. Therefore, 22 patients were included in the study. The absence of IONM alarms during these 22 surgeries had different origins: "true" false negatives where no waveform changes meeting the alarm criteria occurred despite the appropriate IONM (7); a postoperative development of a deficit (6); failure to monitor the pathway, which became injured (5); the absence of interpretable IONM baseline data which precluded any alarm (3); and technical IONM application issues (1).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the rate of IONM method failing to predict the patient's outcome was very low (0.04%, 22/62,038). Minimizing false negatives requires the application of a proper IONM technique with the limitations of each modality considered in their selection and interpretation. Multimodality IONM provides the most inclusive information, and although it might be impractical to monitor every neural structure that can be at risk, a thorough preoperative consideration of available IONM modalities is important. Delayed development of postoperative deficits cannot be predicted by IONM. Absent baseline IONM data should be treated as an alarm when inconsistent with the patient's preoperative neurologic status. Alarm criteria for IONM may need to be refined for specific procedures and deserves continued study.

Monopolar-probe monitoring during spinal surgery with expandable prosthetic ribs

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative monitoring (IOM) has been proven to decrease the risk of neurological injury during scoliosis surgery. The vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) is a device that allows spinal growth. However, injuries to the spinal cord and brachial plexus have been reported after VEPTR implantation in 2 and 5% of patients, respectively. Simultaneous monitoring of these two structures requires the use of multiple time-consuming and complex methods that are ill-suited to the requirements of paediatric surgery, particularly when repeated VEPTR lengthening procedures are needed. We developed a monopolar stimulation method derived from Owen's monitoring technique. This method is easy to implement, requires only widely available equipment, and allows concomitant monitoring of the spinal cord and brachial plexus. The primary objective of this study was to assess the reliability of our technique for brachial plexus monitoring by comparing the stability of neurogenic mixed evoked potentials (NMEPs) at the upper and lower limbs.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesised that the coefficients of variation (CVs) of NMEPs were the same at the upper and lower limbs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twelve VEPTR procedures performed in 6 patients between 1st January 2012 and 1st September 2014 were monitored using a monopolar stimulating probe. NMEPs were recorded simultaneously at the upper and lower limbs, at intervals of 150 s. The recording sites were the elbow over the ulnar nerve and the popliteal fossa near the sciatic nerve. Wilcoxon's test for paired data was used to compare CVs of the upper and lower limb NMEPs on the same side.

RESULTS

Mean CV of NMEP amplitude at the lower limbs was 16.34% on the right and 16.67% on the left; corresponding values for the upper limbs were 18.30 and 19.75%, respectively. Mean CVs of NMEP latencies at the lower limbs were 1.31% on the right and 1.19% on the left; corresponding values for the upper limbs were 1.96 and 1.73%. The risk of type I error for a significant difference between the upper and lower limbs was 0.5843 on the right and 0.7312 on the left for NMEP amplitudes and 0.7618 on the right and 0.4987 on the left for NMEP latencies.

CONCLUSION

Using an epidural active electrode and a sternal return electrode allows simultaneous stimulation of the cervical spinal cord and brachial plexus roots. The NMEPs thus obtained are as stable (reliable) at the upper limbs as at the lower limbs. This easy-to-implement method allows simultaneous monitoring of the upper and lower limbs. It seems well suited to VEPTR procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective single-centre non-randomised study.