Economic study: a cost-effectiveness analysis of an intraoperative compared with a preoperative image-guided system in lumbar pedicle screw fixation in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis

Justifying the implementation of intraoperative computed tomography for midface fracture treatment in improving outcomes

Intraoperative CT scanning is the international standard for treating midface fractures as it allows intraoperative assessment of reduction and fixation. To our knowledge, no NHS hospital in the UK has this facility yet due to the financial and logistical burden of its implementation. The aim of this study was to determine if complications including the requirement for a return to theatre (RTT) could have been predicted from the post-fixation CT scan. All treated midface fractures that had presented to a regionalised major trauma centre within two years (01 January 2020 - 31 December 2021) were identified. Those developing complications including RTT were determined. All postoperative CT scans (including those without complication or RTT) were re-analysed with the clinicians blinded to the outcomes to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of requiring RTT to alter plate position intraoperatively based on CT scan alone. In all, there were eight episodes of unplanned return to theatre, resulting in an overall RTT rate of 8/119 (6.7%). When only analysing patients treated for orbital fractures this RTT rises to 8/40 (20%). Of those eight patients who had a postoperative CT and required RTT, this could have been predicted in 7/8 (87.5%). A total of 16/44 (36.4%) patients that did not have RTT would have additionally been recommended to have the plate position altered based on CT alone. Based upon those that had a CT, the PPV of CT alone being able to predict those requiring RTT was 40.6% and the NPV 96.2%. Our results would suggest intraoperative CT would likely have prevented eight patients requiring RTT in two years and could have improved outcomes in 16 cases. In preventing RTT as well as potentially improving the outcomes of a further 16 cases in maxillofacial surgery, the purchase of an intraoperative CT scanner could yield net savings of £75534-£114990 over two years.

Methodology of economic evaluations in spine surgery: a systematic review and qualitative assessment

OBJECTIVES

The present study is a systematic review conducted as part of a methodological approach to develop evidence-based recommendations for economic evaluations in spine surgery. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the methodology and quality of currently available clinical cost-effectiveness studies in spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic literature review.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, EconLit and The National Institute for Health Research Economic Evaluation Database were searched through 8 December 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Studies were included if they met all of the following eligibility criteria: (1) spine surgery, (2) the study cost-effectiveness and (3) clinical study. Model-based studies were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

The following data items were extracted and evaluated: pathology, number of participants, intervention(s), year, country, study design, time horizon, comparator(s), utility measurement, effectivity measurement, costs measured, perspective, main result and study quality.

RESULTS

130 economic evaluations were included. Seventy-four of these studies were retrospective studies. The majority of the studies had a time horizon shorter than 2 years. Utility measures varied between the EuroQol 5 dimensions and variations of the Short-Form Health Survey. Effect measures varied widely between Visual Analogue Scale for pain, Neck Disability Index, Oswestry Disability Index, reoperation rates and adverse events. All studies included direct costs from a healthcare perspective. Indirect costs were included in 47 studies. Total Consensus Health Economic Criteria scores ranged from 2 to 18, with a mean score of 12.0 over all 130 studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The comparability of economic evaluations in spine surgery is extremely low due to different study designs, follow-up duration and outcome measurements such as utility, effectiveness and costs. This illustrates the need for uniformity in conducting and reporting economic evaluations in spine surgery.

Pre- and intraoperative thoracic spine localization techniques: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

In the era of modern medicine with an armamentarium full of state-of-the art technologies at our disposal, the incidence of wrong-level spinal surgery remains problematic. In particular, the thoracic spine presents a challenge for accurate localization due partly to body habitus, anatomical variations, and radiographic artifact from the ribs and scapula. The present review aims to assess and describe thoracic spine localization techniques.

METHODS

The authors performed a literature search using the PubMed database from 1990 to 2020, compliant with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A total of 27 articles were included in this qualitative review.

RESULTS

A number of pre- and intraoperative strategies have been devised and employed to facilitate correct-level localization. Some of the more well-described approaches include fiducial metallic markers (screw or gold), metallic coils, polymethylmethacrylate, methylene blue, marking wire, use of intraoperative neuronavigation, intraoperative localization techniques (including using a needle, temperature probe, fluoroscopy, MRI, and ultrasonography), and skin marking.

CONCLUSIONS

While a number of techniques exist to accurately localize lesions in the thoracic spine, each has its advantages and disadvantages. Ultimately, the localization technique deployed by the spine surgeon will be patient-specific but often based on surgeon preference.

Utility of 3-Dimensional Intraoperative Imaging in Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures: A Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Successful surgical management of pelvic ring and acetabular fractures requires technical expertise to achieve an accurate reduction and stable fixation. The use of 3-dimensional (3D) intraoperative imaging (3DIOI) as an assessment tool has led to improved reduction and placement of implants. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of using 3DIOI in the management of acetabular and pelvic fractures on the basis of outcomes reported in the literature.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), and Google Scholar using key terms. A network meta-analysis conducted using the frequentist approach allowed for statistical analysis of reported outcomes regarding screw position (in mm), fracture reduction (in mm), and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies were included in this analysis. When compared with conventional radiography, the mean radiation dose (in cGy·cm2) was significantly higher in 3DIOI (mean difference, 82.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 21.83 to 143.61; p = 0.007). Use of 3DIOI yielded a 93% lower risk of developing medical complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.07; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.35; p = 0.014). Use of 3DIOI yielded higher odds of achieving accurate screw placement (OR, 4.21; 95% CI, 1.44 to 12.32; p = 0.008) and perfect reduction (OR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.19 to 5.68; p = 0.016). In ranking the imaging modalities, 12 of the 13 parameters analyzed were in favor of 3DIOI over conventional fluoroscopy and 2D navigation imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Current literature supports the use of 3DIOI because of the decreased rates of misplaced implants, malreduced fractures, complications, and subsequent revision operations. The use of 3DIOI allows for improved visualization of pelvic anatomy when repairing pelvic and acetabular fractures, and helps surgeons to achieve favorable surgical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality Transforming Spinal Imaging Landscape: A Feasibility Study

This article discusses a systematic review of the state-of-the-art on augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) in spinal navigation, where early clinical validations have shown promising outlook on accuracy and scalability parameters. The objective of this research is to evaluate clinical relevance for AR-VR enabled spinal surgical technologies and develop an economic feasibility model for stakeholders, such as patients, hospitals, and research organizations with technology adoption. From the influencing parameters, we identified the research gaps that can be explored going forward and a list of high priority research challenges that could provide an attractive research and development investment case for industry players.

Conventional versus stereotactic image guided pedicle screw placement during spinal deformity correction: a retrospective propensity score-matched study of a national longitudinal database

PURPOSE/AIM

To compare complications, readmissions, revisions, and payments between navigated and conventional pedicle screw fixation for treatment of spine deformity.

METHODS

The Thomson Reuters MarketScan national longitudinal database was used to identify patients undergoing osteotomy, posterior instrumentation, and fusion for treatment of spinal deformity with or without image-guided navigation between 2007-2016. Conventional and navigated groups were propensity-matched (1:1) to normalize differences between demographics, comorbidities, and surgical characteristics. Clinical outcomes and charges were compared between matched groups using bivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 4,604 patients were identified as having undergone deformity correction, of which 286 (6.2%) were navigated. Propensity-matching resulted in a total of 572 well-matched patients for subsequent analyses, of which half were navigated. Rate of mechanical instrumentation-related complications was found to be significantly lower for navigated procedures (p = 0.0371). Navigation was also associated with lower rates of 90-day unplanned readmissions (p = 0.0295), as well as 30- and 90-day postoperative revisions (30-day: p = 0.0304, 90-day: p = 0.0059). Hospital, physician, and total payments favored the conventional group for initial admission (p = 0.0481, 0.0001, 0.0019, respectively); however, when taking into account costs of readmissions, hospital payments became insignificantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Procedures involving image-guided navigation resulted in decreased instrumentation-related complications, unplanned readmissions, and postoperative revisions, highlighting its potential utility for the treatment of spine deformity. Future advances in navigation technologies and methodologies can continue to improve clinical outcomes, decrease costs, and facilitate widespread adoption of navigation for deformity correction.

Role of 3D intraoperative imaging in orthopedic and trauma surgery

Intraoperative three-dimensional (3D) imaging is now feasible because of recent technological advances such as 3D cone-beam CT (CBCT) and flat-panel X-ray detectors (FPDs). These technologies reduce the radiation dose to the patient and surgical team. The aim of this study is to review the advantages of 3D intraoperative imaging in orthopedic and trauma surgery by answering the following 5 questions: What are its technical principles? CBCT with a FPD produces non-distorted digital images and frees up the surgical field. The high quality of these 3D intraoperative images allows them to be integrated into surgical navigation systems. Human-robot comanipulation will likely follow soon after. Conventional multislice CT technology has also improved to the point where it can be used in the operating room. What can we expect from 3D intraoperative imaging and which applications have been validated clinically? We reviewed the literature on this topic for the past 10 years. The expected benefits were determined during the implantation of pedicular screws: more accurate implantation, fewer surgical revisions and time savings. There are few studies in trauma or arthroplasty cases, as robotic comanipulation is a more recent development. What is the tolerance for irradiation to the patient and surgical team? The health drawbacks are the harmful radiation-induced effects. The deterministic effects that we will develop are correlated to the absorbed dose in Gray units (Gy). The stochastic and carcinogenic effects are related to the effective dose in milliSievert (mSv) of linear evolution without threshold. The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) states that irradiation for medical purposes with risk of detriment is acceptable if it is justified by an optimization attempt. The radioprotection limits must be known but do not constitute opposable restrictions. The superiority of intraoperative 3D imaging over fluoroscopy has been demonstrated for spine surgery and sacroiliac screw fixation. How does the environment need to be adapted? The volume, access, wall protection and floor strength of the operating room must take into account the features of each machine. The instrumentation implants and need for specialized staff result in additional costs. Not every system can track movements during the CBCT acquisition thus transient suspension of assisted ventilation may be required. Is it financially viable? This needs to be calculated based on the expected clinical benefits, which mainly correspond to the elimination of expenses tied to surgical revisions. Our society's search for safety has driven the investments in this technology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V, Expert opinion.

Conventional Versus Stereotactic Image-guided Pedicle Screw Placement During Posterior Lumbar Fusions: A Retrospective Propensity Score-matched Study of a National Longitudinal Database

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis on a national longitudinal database between 2007 and 2016.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare complication rates, revision rates, and payment differences between navigated and conventional posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) procedures with instrumentation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Stereotactic navigation techniques for spinal instrumentation have been widely demonstrated to improve screw placement accuracies and decrease perforation rates when compared to conventional fluoroscopic and free-hand techniques. However, the clinical utility of navigation for instrumented PLF remains controversial.

METHODS

Patients who underwent elective laminectomy and instrumented PLF were stratified into "single level" and "3- to 6-level" cohorts. Navigation and conventional groups within each cohort were balanced using 1:1 propensity score matching, resulting in 1786 navigated and conventional patients in the single-level cohort and 2060 in the 3 to 6 level cohort. Outcomes were compared using bivariate analysis.

RESULTS

For the single-level cohort, there were no significant differences in rates of complications, readmissions, revisions, and length of stay between the navigation and conventional groups. For the 3- to 6-level cohort, length of stay was significantly longer in the navigation group (P < 0.0001). Rates of readmissions were, however, greater for the conventional group (30-day: P = 0.0239; 90-day: P = 0.0449). Overall complications were also greater for the conventional group (P = 0.0338), whereas revision rate was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Total payments were significantly greater for the navigation group in both the single level and 3- to 6-level cohorts (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Although use of navigation for 3- to 6-level instrumented PLF was associated with increased length of stay and payments, the concurrent decreased overall complication and readmission rates alluded to its potential clinical utility. However, for single-level instrumented PLF, no differences in outcomes were found between groups, suggesting that the value in navigation may lie in more complex procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Intraoperative Error Propagation in 3-Dimensional Spinal Navigation From Nonsegmental Registration: A Prospective Cadaveric and Clinical Study

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective pre-clinical and clinical cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

Current spinal navigation systems rely on a dynamic reference frame (DRF) for image-to-patient registration and tool tracking. Working distant to a DRF may generate inaccuracy. Here we quantitate predictors of navigation error as a function of distance from the registered vertebral level, and from intersegmental mobility due to surgical manipulation and patient respiration.

METHODS

Navigation errors from working distant to the registered level, and from surgical manipulation, were quantified in 4 human cadavers. The 3-dimensional (3D) position of a tracked tool tip at 0 to 5 levels from the DRF, and during targeting of pedicle screw tracts, was captured in real-time by an optical navigation system. Respiration-induced vertebral motion was quantified from 10 clinical cases of open posterior instrumentation. The 3D position of a custom spinous-process clamp was tracked over 12 respiratory cycles.

RESULTS

An increase in mean 3D navigation error of ≥2 mm was observed at ≥2 levels from the DRF in the cervical and lumbar spine. Mean ± SD displacement due to surgical manipulation was 1.55 ± 1.13 mm in 3D across all levels, ≥2 mm in 17.4%, 19.2%, and 38.5% of levels in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine, respectively. Mean ± SD respiration-induced 3D motion was 1.96 ± 1.32 mm, greatest in the lower thoracic spine (P < .001). Tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure correlated positively with increased vertebral displacement.

CONCLUSIONS

Vertebral motion is unaccounted for during image-guided surgery when performed at levels distant from the DRF. Navigating instrumentation within 2 levels of the DRF likely minimizes the risk of navigation error.

Economic study: an observational analysis of costs and effectiveness of an intraoperative compared with a preoperative image-guided system in spine surgery fixation: analysis of 10 years of experience

BACKGROUND

Image-guided navigation systems are well establish technologies; their use in clinical practice is growing. To date many publications have demonstrated their accuracy and safety. However, the acquisition and maintenance costs are high. In an era in which health expenditures are rising exponentially, analyses of the economic impact of new technologies are mandatory to assess their sustainability.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis to assess the overall costs of a series of patients admitted to our Neurosurgical Department for spinal instrumentation. We compared two different types of spinal navigation systems: based on preoperative CT scan (January 2003-April 2009) and on intraoperative CT-like scan (April 2009-March 2013). We used a micro-costing approach by a hospital perspective considering all the phases of the treatment process, from pre admission testing to discharge.

RESULTS

The study includes 875 patients. Baseline data, hospitalization and complications were similar for both. Mean cost was 7,305.9 € for intraoperative CT scan procedure and 7,666.2 € for preoperative image-guided system. The effectiveness, in terms of screw accuracy was similar. Higher costs were related to implanted materials, human resources, and disposable.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of costs. A break-even point for the acquisition of an intraoperative image system is calculated in almost 130 procedures. Moreover, nowadays this system is used for more than only screw insertion reducing the financial impact of this technology on a Hospital.

Comparison of the Clinical Accuracy Between Point-to-Point Registration and Auto-Registration Using an Active Infrared Navigation System

STUDY DESIGN

A model experiment.

OBJECTIVE

To measure and compare the clinical accuracy of point-to-point registration (PR) and auto-registration (AR) in an operative set using an active infrared navigation system.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

PR and AR are two major registration methods of navigation assisted spinal surgery. No previous study compared the difference between the two methods with respect to clinical accuracy.

METHODS

A novel method was used to measure the clinical accuracy of the navigation system under an operative set using a Sawbone model with titanium beads on the surface, which was essential to measure the accuracy numerically, instead of a real patient. Both the operative set and the procedure mimicked a regular surgery. The clinical accuracy was defined as the average distance between the "navigation coordinate" and the "image coordinate." The clinical accuracy of the PR using preoperative computed tomography (CT) images and the AR using intraoperative CT images was measured and compared.

RESULTS

The average clinical accuracy of PR was different among different segments. The accuracy of the most accurate segment, which provided the reference points during the PR, was 1.10 mm. In the two segments adjacent to the reference segment, the clinical accuracy deteriorated to 1.37 and 1.50 mm. The accuracy of the farther segments was worse. In comparison, the clinical accuracy of different segments of AR was of no significant difference. The average accuracy of AR was 0.74 mm, which was significantly better than the best accuracy of PR.

CONCLUSION

AR is better than PR with respect to clinical accuracy in navigation assisted spinal surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Fate of S2-Alar-Iliac Screws After 12-Month Minimum Radiographic Follow-up: Preliminary Results

BACKGROUND

S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screws are 1 technique for lumbopelvic fixation to improve fusion rates across the lumbosacral junction that has gained wider acceptance. The S2AI screw crosses the cortical surfaces of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ), which may improve the biomechanical strength of the instrumentation.

OBJECTIVE

To report preliminary radiographic outcomes of patients who underwent lumbopelvic fixation with S2AI screws with a minimum 12-month follow-up.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed adult patients who underwent lumbopelvic fixation with S2AI screws. Patients with computed tomography (CT) scans obtained preoperatively and ≥12 months postoperatively were reviewed to determine whether there was S2AI screw backout or breakage, periscrew lucency, or SIJ degeneration, and to assess L5-S1 fusion status.

RESULTS

Twenty-six S2AI screws in 13 patients were evaluated (mean follow-up 24.8 months [14-52 months]). Nine patients had L5-S1 interbody grafts. Partial periscrew lucency was identified in 7 S2AI screws (27%) in 5 patients (38%), and L5-S1 fusion occurred in 92% of patients. L5-S1 nonunion was seen in 1 patient (8%), who had evidence of bilateral screw loosening in the sacral portion. Four patients with screw loosening had an osseous L5-S1 fusion. No patients had radiographic evidence of progression of SIJ degeneration, experienced screw backout or breakage, required reoperation for L5-S1 nonunion, or had S2AI screw-related complication.

CONCLUSION

S2AI screws maintained their integrity without causing SIJ degeneration or major screw-related complications in this small retrospective series with short follow-up. Long-term results are needed to evaluate the durability of S2AI screws over time.

Inserting pedicle screws in lumbar spondylolisthesis - The easy bone conserving way

BACKGROUND

Pedicle screw fixation in high grade lumbar listhetic vertebral body has been nightmare for Orthopaedic and spine surgeons. This is because of abnormally positioned listhetic pedicles and non-visualization of pedicle in conventional image intensifier (C-Arm). This results into increased surgical time, more blood loss, radiation exposure and more chances of infection. To overcome this problem, we have devised a new Technique of putting of pedicle screw fixation in listhetic vertebrae.

METHODS

Total 20 patients of average age of 42 (25-56) were included during 2010 to 2015. Listhesis was classified according to etiology, Meyerding grading and DeWald modification of Newman criteria used for assessment of severity for spondylolisthesis on standing X-ray lumbosacral spine. Patients satisfying following criteria were considered for surgery. Age more than 20 years, with single involvement of either L4-5/L5-S1, high grade spondylolisthesis (≥ 50% Meyerding grade), unresolving radiculopathy, cauda equina syndrome or pain with and without instability not relieved by 6 months of conservative treatment. According to Meyerding radiographic grading system,10 patients were of type II and 8 of type III and 2 of type IV. Treatment given was pedicle screw fixation, reduction of listhesis vertebra and spinal fusion with our technique. PLT was done in 10 cases and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in the other 10 cases.

RESULTS

Mean follow up duration was 2 years (range 1.3-3.3 year). The average preoperative LBP VAS of low back pain were 6.7 and average LP VAS for leg pain 5.7. Postoperatively at final follow up there was reduction of LBP VAS to 2.2 and LP VAS to 0.5. There was rapid reduction in their LBP VAS in first two visits at 4 weeks and in LP VAS in first three visits at 8 weeks. The pain-free walking distance improved significantly. The average pre-operative ODI score was 51.4, improved to 18.6 postoperatively. There was no difference in above scores between PLT and TLIF.

CONCLUSION

Our surgical technique used for high grade spondylolisthesis is safe, cost-effective, bone-preserving, reliable, and reproducible for high grade Lumber spondylolisthesis.

Economic evaluation comparing intraoperative cone beam CT-based navigation and conventional fluoroscopy for the placement of spinal pedicle screws: a patient-level data cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Pedicle screws are routinely used in contemporary spinal surgery. Screw misplacement may be asymptomatic but is also correlated with potential adverse events. Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) has been associated with improved screw placement accuracy rates. However, this technology has substantial acquisition and maintenance costs. Despite its increasing usage, no rigorous full economic evaluation comparing this technology to current standard of care has been reported.

PURPOSE

Medical costs are exploding in an unsustainable way. Health economic theory requires that medical equipment costs be compared with expected benefits. To answer this question for computer-assisted spinal surgery, we present an economic evaluation looking specifically at symptomatic misplaced screws leading to reoperation secondary to neurologic deficits or biomechanical concerns.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

The study design was an observational case-control study from prospectively collected data of consecutive patients treated with the aid of CAS (treatment group) compared with a matched historical cohort of patients treated with conventional fluoroscopy (control group).

PATIENT SAMPLE

The patient sample consisted of consecutive patients treated surgically at a quaternary academic center.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary effectiveness measure studied was the number of reoperations for misplaced screws within 1 year of the index surgery. Secondary outcome measures included were total adverse event rate and postoperative computed tomography usage for pedicle screw examination.

METHODS

A patient-level data cost-effectiveness analysis from the hospital perspective was conducted to determine the value of a navigation system coupled with intraoperative 3-D imaging (O-arm Imaging and the StealthStation S7 Navigation Systems, Medtronic, Louisville, CO, USA) in adult spinal surgery. The capital costs for both alternatives were reported as equivalent annual costs based on the annuitization of capital expenditures method using a 3% discount rate and a 7-year amortization period. Annual maintenance costs were also added. Finally, reoperation costs using a micro-costing approach were calculated for both groups. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated and reported as cost per reoperation avoided. Based on reoperation costs in Canada and in the United States, a minimal caseload was calculated for the more expensive alternative to be cost saving. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 5,132 pedicle screws were inserted in 502 patients during the study period: 2,682 screws in 253 patients in the treatment group and 2,450 screws in 249 patients in the control group. Overall accuracy rates were 95.2% for the treatment group and 86.9% for the control group. Within 1 year post treatment, two patients (0.8%) required a revision surgery in the treatment group compared with 15 patients (6%) in the control group. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $15,961 per reoperation avoided was calculated for the CAS group. Based on a reoperation cost of $12,618, this new technology becomes cost saving for centers performing more than 254 instrumented spinal procedures per year.

CONCLUSIONS

Computer-assisted spinal surgery has the potential to reduce reoperation rates and thus to have serious cost-effectiveness and policy implications. High acquisition and maintenance costs of this technology can be offset by equally high reoperation costs. Our cost-effectiveness analysis showed that for high-volume centers with a similar case complexity to the studied population, this technology is economically justified.

Spinal Navigation and Imaging: History, Trends, and Future

The clinical practice of spine navigation has rapidly grown with the development of image-based guidance. In this paper, a brief history of spinal navigation is presented and a review of clinical outcomes for 12,622 pedicle screws placed using the latest technology in the sacral, lumbar and thoracic regions. The clinical evidence demonstrate that intraoperative 3D image guided surgery has a 96.8% success rate. A concluding section detailing existing barriers that limit more widespread adoption and future development efforts is presented.

Economics of image guidance and navigation in spine surgery

Background:

Image-guidance and navigation in spinal surgery is becoming more widely utilized. Several studies have shown the use of this technology to increase accuracy of pedicle screw placement, decrease the rates of revision surgery, and minimize radiation exposure. In this paper, the authors analyze the economics of image-guided surgery (IGS) and navigation in spine surgery.

Methods:

A literature review was performed using PubMed, the CEA Registry, and the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database. Each article was screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria, including costs, reoperation, readmission rates, operating room time, and length of stay.

Results:

Thirteen studies were included in the analysis. Six studies were identified to meet the inclusion criteria for reporting costs and seven met the criteria for analysis of efficacy. Average costs ranged from $17,650 to $39,643. Pedicle screw misplacement rates using IGS ranged from 1.20% to 15.07% while reoperation rates ranged from 0% to 7.42%.

Conclusion:

There is currently an insufficient amount of studies reporting on the economics of spinal navigation to accurately conclude on its cost-effectiveness in clinical practice. Although a few of these studies showed less costs associated with intraoperative imaging, none were able to establish a statistically significant difference. Preliminary findings drawn from this study indicate a possible cost-effectiveness advantage with IGS, but more comprehensive data on costs need to be reported in order to validate its utilization.

When change happens: computer assistance and image guidance for minimally invasive therapy

Computer-assisted interventions are medical procedures that rely on image guidance and computer-based systems to provide visualisation and navigation information to the clinician, when direct vision of the sites or targets to be treated is not available, during minimally invasive procedures. Recent advances in medical image acquisition and processing, accompanied by technological breakthroughs in image fusion, visualisation and display have accelerated the adoption of minimally invasive approaches for a variety of medical procedures. This Letter is intended to serve as a brief overview of available image guidance and computer-assisted technology in the context of popular minimally invasive applications, while outlining some of the limitations and challenges in the transition from laboratory to clinical care.