Kinematic analysis of diseased and adjacent segments in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis

Findings from a pilot randomized trial of spinal decompression alone or spinal decompression plus instrumented fusion

Aims

Symptomatic spinal stenosis is a very common problem, and decompression surgery has been shown to be superior to nonoperative treatment in selected patient groups. However, performing an instrumented fusion in addition to decompression may avoid revision and improve outcomes. The aim of the SpInOuT feasibility study was to establish whether a definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT) that accounted for the spectrum of pathology contributing to spinal stenosis, including pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch and mobile spondylolisthesis, could be conducted.

Methods

As part of the SpInOuT-F study, a pilot randomized trial was carried out across five NHS hospitals. Patients were randomized to either spinal decompression alone or spinal decompression plus instrumented fusion. Patient-reported outcome measures were collected at baseline and three months. The intended sample size was 60 patients.

Results

Of the 90 patients screened, 77 passed the initial screening criteria. A total of 27 patients had a PI-LL mismatch and 23 had a dynamic spondylolisthesis. Following secondary inclusion and exclusion criteria, 31 patients were eligible for the study. Six patients were randomized and one underwent surgery during the study period. Given the low number of patients recruited and randomized, it was not possible to assess completion rates, quality of life, imaging, or health economic outcomes as intended.

Conclusion

This study provides a unique insight into the prevalence of dynamic spondylolisthesis and PI-LL mismatch in patients with symptomatic spinal stenosis, and demonstrates that there is a need for a definitive RCT which stratifies for these groups in order to inform surgical decision-making. Nonetheless a definitive study would need further refinement in design and implementation in order to be feasible.

The effect of sagittal alignment, coronal balance, and segmental stability on preoperative patient-reported outcomes in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between spinal alignment and preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) and to identify the independent risk factors for worse preoperative PROs.

METHODS

In total, 101 patients suffering from DLS were retrospectively studied within a single medical center. Age, sex, height, weight, and body mass index were uniformly recorded. PRO-related indicators include the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Japanese Orthopedic Association's (JOA) score, and the visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain. Sagittal alignment, coronal balance, and stability of the L4/5 level were evaluated through whole-spine anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and dynamic lumbar X-ray.

RESULTS

Increasing age (P = 0.005), higher sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (P < 0.001), and global coronal imbalance (GCI) (P = 0.023) were independent risk factors for higher ODI. Patients with GCI had lower JOA scores (P = 0.001) than those with balanced coronal alignment. Unstable spondylolisthesis (P < 0.001) and GCI (P = 0.009) were two vital predictors of VAS-back pain. Increasing age (P = 0.031), local coronal imbalance (LCI) (P < 0.001), and GCI (P < 0.001) were associated with higher VAS-leg pain. Moreover, patients with coronal imbalance also exhibited significant sagittal malalignment based on the subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSION

DLS patients with higher SVA, unstable spondylolistheses, a combination of LCI/GCI, or increasing age were predisposed to have more severe subjective symptoms before surgery.

Lumbar spondylolisthesis: STATE of the art on assessment and conservative treatment

INTRODUCTION

There is weak relationship between the presence of lumbar spondylolisthesis [SPL] and low back pain that is not always associated with instability, either at the involved lumbar segment or at different spinal levels. Therefore patients with lumbar symptomatic SPL can be divided into stable and unstable, based on the level of mobility during flexion and extension movements as general classifications for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Different opinions persist about best treatment (conservative vs. surgical) and among conservative treatments, on the type, dosage, and progression of physical therapy procedures.

PURPOSE AND IMPORTANCE TO PRACTICE

The aim of this Masterclass is to provide clinicians evidence-based indications for assessment and conservative treatment of SPL, taking into consideration some subgroups related to specific clinical presentations.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

This Masterclass addresses the different phases of the assessment of a patient with SPL, including history, imaging, physical exam, and questionnaires on disability and cognitive-behavioral components. Regarding conservative treatment, self- management approaches and graded supervised training, including therapeutic relationships, information and education, are explained. Primary therapeutic procedures for pain control, recovery of the function and the mobility through therapeutic exercise, passive mobilization and antalgic techniques are suggested. Moreover, some guidance is provided on conservative treatment in specific clinical presentations (lumbar SPL with radiating pain and/or lumbar stenosis, SPL complicated by other factors, and SPL in adolescents) and the number/duration of sessions.

FUTURE RESEARCH PRIORITIES

Some steps to improve the diagnostic-therapeutic approach in SPL are to identify the best cluster of clinical tests, define different lumbar SPL subgroups, and investigate the effects of treatments based on that classification, similarly to the approach already proposed for non-specific LBP.

The Correlation Between Negative Nerve Root Sedimentation Sign and Gravity: A Study of Upright Lumbar Multi-Positional Magnetic Resonance Images

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective upright MRI study.

OBJECTIVE

To validate the presence of positive and negative nerve root sedimentation signs on multi-positional MRI in the upright position and explore the relationship between negative nerve root sedimentation and gravity.

METHODS

T2-weighted axial multi-positional images in the upright position at the intervertebral disc levels from L1-L2 to L4-L5 in 141 patients with non-specific low back pain were retrospectively assessed. A positive sedimentation sign was defined as the absence of nerve root sedimentation or the absence of dorsal conglomeration of nerve roots within the dural sac. A negative sedimentation sign was defined as nerve root sedimentation dorsally or dorso-laterally like a horseshoe. Intra-and inter-observer reliability was evaluated. The relationship between sedimentation sign and dural sac cross-sectional area (CSA), anterior-posterior (AP) diameter was also explored.

RESULTS

The kappa value of intra-observer reliability was 0.962 and inter-observer reliability was 0.925. Both positive and negative sedimentation signs did appear at all 4 lumbar levels, including L1/2, L2/3, L3/4 and L4/5. A positive sedimentation sign was associated with significantly decreased dural sac CSA and AP diameter at L2/3, L3/4 or L4/5 level when compared to negative sedimentation sign.

CONCLUSIONS

Both negative and positive sedimentation signs appeared at the L1/2, L2/3, L3/4, and L4/5 levels on the upright MRI, which suggested that the presence of nerve roots sedimenting dorsally in patients may not be associated with gravity. Moreover, the current study supports that sedimentation signs on multi-positional MRI images could have the same diagnostic functions as on MRI images.

Clinical Implication of Mid-Range Dynamic Instability in Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective evaluation.

PURPOSE

To determine the prevalence of mid-range dynamic instability in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) and to evaluate the clinical implication of mid-range instability (MI).

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

Instability is identified by measuring vertebral body anterior-posterior translation on static end-range flexion and extension lateral radiographs. Mid-range kinematics could evince occult dynamic instability in which motion is not appreciated at the terminal-range of motion.

METHODS

In this study, 30 patients with DS with checked standing dynamic radiographs of the lumbar spine in Gwangmyeong Sungae Orthopedic Clinic were recruited. Standing lateral radiographs were evaluated in extension, 45° of flexion (mid-range) and 90° of flexion (terminal-range) of the lumbar spine. Instability was defined as sagittal translation greater than 3 mm from the extension position. Patients were divided into three groups: a control group, an MI group, and a terminal-range instability (TI) group. Radiographic outcome (stenosis grade) and clinical outcome were compared between the three groups.

RESULTS

The average sagittal translation of the lumbar spine was 5.2 mm in extension, 6.6 mm in mid-range, and 7.2 mm in endrange. MI was observed in eight patients (26.2%) and TI was seen in 12 patients (40%). Of eight patients with MI, three patients did not have instability at terminal-range (occult patients) and five patients had instability at terminal-range (typical patients). Body weight and body mass index (BMI) was significantly higher in the MI group as compared to the control group. BMI was positively correlated with slippage to mid-range. There was no significant difference in stenosis grade, Visual Analog Scale, and Oswestry Disability Index. In the TI group, there was no significant difference in radiographic clinical parameters as compared to the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

MI was demonstrated in 25% of DS patients. Mid-range motion was increased with BMI. Mid-range lateral radiography can reveal occult instability in patients with DS, particularly in obese patients.

The most appropriate cervical vertebra for the measurement of occipitocervical inclination parameter: a validation study of C3, C4, and C5 levels using multi-positional magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

To evaluate which cervical level is the most appropriate level to measure occipitocervical inclination (OCI).

METHODS

Sixty-two patients with multi-positional MRI: 24 males and 38 females, who had cervical lordosis and had a disk degeneration grade of 3 or less were included. We measured patient's OCI at C3, C4, and C5, occipitocervical angle (OCA), occipitocervical distance (OCD), C2-7 angle, and cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) in neutral, flexion, and extension position. The correlation between OCI and OCA, OCD, C2-7 angle, and cSVA on each cervical level in all three positions was tested using Pearson's correlation coefficient test. The difference between OCIs at each cervical level was tested by Wilcoxon signed-rank test. p value of less than 0.05 was set as a statistically significant level.

RESULTS

C5 OCI showed statistically significant correlation with OCA, OCD, C2-7 angle, and cSVA in all three positions (p < 0.05, r = 0.214-0.525). C3 OCI in flexion (p = 0.393, r = 0.081) and C4 OCI in neutral and flexion (neutral p = 0.275, r 0.104; flexion p = 0.987, r = 0.002) did not show significant correlation with C2-7 angle. There was a statistically significant difference between C3, C4, and C5 OCIs in neutral and extension position (p < 0.05). At the same time, OCI showed statistically strong correlation between adjacent cervical levels (p < 0.001, r = 0.627-0.822).

CONCLUSION

C5 cervical level is the most appropriate level for OCI measurement. OCI should be measured at the same cervical level at all time. C4 OCI can reliably substitute C5 OCI in case C5 which is invisible on radiographic image. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

The Impact of Cervical Spinal Muscle Degeneration on Cervical Sagittal Balance and Spinal Degenerative Disorders

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective analysis of kinematic magnetic resonance images (kMRI).

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association of cervical paraspinal muscle with cervical sagittal balance and degenerative spinal disorders.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although the effects of spinal disorders and cervical imbalance on patient's symptoms have been well described, the relationship of the cervical muscle quality and volume to cervical imbalance or spinal disorders is not well established.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 100 kMRI taken in a neutral weight-bearing position were analyzed. The adjusted cross-sectional area ratio (aCSA ratio: the value of muscle CSA divided by the vertebral CSA) and fat infiltration ratio of the transversospinalis muscles at C4 and C7 vertebral levels were measured using axial slice of kMRI. The correlation with cervical balance parameters [Oc-C2 angle, C2-C7 angle, C7-T1 angle, C7 slope, T1 slope, cranial tilt, cervical tilt, thoracic inlet angle (TIA), and neck tilt] and cervical degenerative disorders (disk degeneration, Modic change, and spondylolisthesis) were evaluated.

RESULTS

The aCSA ratio at C4 correlated with C2-C7 angle (r=0.267), C7 slope (r=0.207), T1 slope (r=0.221), disk degeneration at C3-4, C4-5, C5-6 (r=-0.234, -0.313, -0.262) and spondylolisthesis at C3 (anterior: r=-0.206, posterior: r=-0.249). The aCSA ratio at C7 correlated with disk degeneration at C3-4, C4-5, C5-6, C6-7 (r=-0.209, -0.294, -0.239, -0.209). The fat infiltration ratio at C4 correlated with TIA (r=0.306) and neck tilt (r=0.353), likewise the ratio at C7 correlated with TIA (r=0.270) and neck tilt (r=0.405). All correlations above were statistically significant with P<0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

The paraspinal muscle volume showed significant relationship with the cervical balance parameters and disk degeneration. While, paraspinal muscle quality related to the thoracic inlet parameters. Our findings can be an important step to develop the knowledge of the association between cervical muscle and cervical degenerative disorders, as well as the sagittal balance of the cervical spine.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

[Vertebral three-dimensional motion characteristics of adjacent segments in patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis in vivo]

Objective

To observe vertebral three-dimensional motion characteristics of adjacent segments in patients with symptomatic L 4 isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS).

Methods

Fourteen symptomatic L 4 IS patients who underwent surgery treatment (trial group) and 15 asymptomatic volunteers without back pain and other lesions of spine (control group) were recruited. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, and bone mineral density between the two groups ( P>0.05). The three-dimensional reconstruction model of lumbar spine was acquired from the thin slice CT of the lumbar spine of the subjects by combining dual-X-ray fluoroscopy imaging system with spiral CT examination. The model was matched to the double oblique X-ray fluoroscopy images captured by dual-X-ray fluoroscopy imaging system at different active positions of the lumbar spine to reproduce the three-dimensional instantaneous of lumbar spondylolisthesis at different state of motion. The motion and relative displacement of adjacent segments (L 3, 4 and L 5, S 1) of spondylolisthesis were measured quantitatively by establishing a three-dimensional coordinate system at the geometric center of the vertebral body. The results were compared with those of the control group.

Results

When L 3, 4 in the control group were flexed flexion-extension, left-right twisting, and left-right bending, and when L 5, S 1 in the control group were flexed left-right twisting and left-right bending, the activity along the main axis of motion (main axis of motion) tended to increase compared with that along the corresponding coupled axis of motion (secondary axis of motion); however, this trend disappeared in the trial group, and the main and secondary movements were disordered. Because of the coronal orientation of the facet joints of L 5, S 1, the degree of motion along the main axis of motion decreased during flexion and extension, but this trend disappeared in the trial group. Compared with the control group, L 3, 4 in the trial group exhibited displacement instability in flexion-extension, left-right twisting, and left-right bending ( P<0.05); there was no significant difference in the relative displacement of L 5, S 1 intervertebral bodies along x, y, and z axes between the trial group and the control group in flexion-extension, left-right twisting, and left-right bending curvature ( P>0.05).

Conclusion

Patients with symptomatic L 4 IS have disorders of primary and secondary movement patterns in adjacent segments, while IS showed significantly displacement instability in L 3, 4 and significantly decreased motion in L 5, S 1.

Kinematic evaluation of thoracic spinal cord sagittal diameter and the space available for cord using weight-bearing kinematic magnetic resonance imaging

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective kinematic MRI (kMRI) study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the dynamic changes of thoracic anterior and posterior space available for cord (SAC), and thoracic spinal cord in the dural sac in three positions.

SETTING

Expert MRI, Bellflower California; and University of Southern California, in Los Angeles, USA.

METHODS

A total of 118 patients (66 males and 52 females, mean age ( ± SD) of 45.6 ± 10.6 years) who underwent thoracic spine kMRI were evaluated from T4-5 to T11-12 in flexion, neutral, and extension positions. The anterior SAC, posterior SAC, and mid-sagittal thoracic cord diameter were measured at each level from T4-5 to T11-12. Inter- and intraobserver agreements were analyzed.

RESULTS

The anterior SAC was significantly narrower in flexion position compared with other positions at T8-9 to T11-12 levels (p < 0.01). The T8-9 level had significantly wider posterior SAC in flexion and extension positions compared with the neutral position (p < 0.005). However, the posterior SAC at T9-10 was narrower in extension than the neutral position (p = 0.002). Thoracic spinal cord diameter significantly increased in flexion position when compared with the neutral position at T8-9, T9-10, and T11-12 levels (p < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracic spinal cord had dynamic changes with positions. In flexion position, the thoracic cord at T8-9 and below tended to move anteriorly, getting closer to the vertebral body and intervertebral disc. The mid-sagittal diameter of the thoracic cord increased in flexion position at the levels below T8-9. In the presence of lesions in anterior epidural space, the risk of spinal cord compression is higher in flexion position, especially at levels below T8-9.

Evaluation of foraminal cross-sectional area in lumbar spondylolisthesis using kinematic MRI

PURPOSE

To evaluate the kinematic change of cross-sectional area of lumbar intervertebral foramen in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis patients using multi-positional MRI.

METHODS

Multi-positional MRI was performed on 31 patients diagnosed with single or multilevel degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and 31 control patients without degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Foraminal area (FA) was measured at the lumbar spondylolisthesis level in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis group and at L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1 level in the control group. FA was measured bilaterally in neutral, flexion, and extension positions. The difference in FA between the groups was analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test, and the difference between positions within groups was analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis group showed significantly smaller FA on both sides and on average in all three positions compared to the control group (p < 0.05 all). From neutral to flexion position, the change in FA was significantly smaller in the degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis group than in the control group on both sides and on average (p < 0.005 all). In degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis group, the FA showed no significant change from neutral to flexion, but showed significant change from neutral to extension (p < 0.005 all).

CONCLUSIONS

FA in the degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis group was smaller than in the control group. There was no difference in FA in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis group from neutral to flexion, only from neutral to extension. Patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis have a higher chance of developing foraminal stenosis.

Can C7 Slope Substitute the T1 slope?: An Analysis Using Cervical Radiographs and Kinematic MRIs

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of consecutive 45 radiographs and 120 kinematic magnetic resonance images (kMRI) OBJECTIVE.: The aim was to assess the visibility of C7 and T1 endplates on radiographs, and to verify the correlation between C7 or T1 slope and cervical balance parameters using kMRI.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Because the T1 slope is not always visible due to the anatomical interference, several studies have used C7 slope instead of T1. However, it is still unclear whether the C7 endplate is more visible on radiographs than T1, and if C7 slope has similarity with T1 slope.

METHODS

The endplate visibility was determined using weight-bearing radiography. Subsequently, using weight-bearing MR images, the C7 slope of upper and lower endplate, T1 slope, C1 inclination, C2 slope, atlas-dens interval (ADI), C2-C7 lordotic angle, cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), cervical tilt, cranial tilt, neck tilt, thoracic inlet angle (TIA) were measured, for the analysis of correlation between three types of slopes and cervical balance parameters.

RESULTS

82% of the upper C7, and 18% of T1 endplate were clearly visible. The upper C7 endplate was significantly visible, whereas T1 endplate was significantly invisible (residual analysis, P < 0.01). Linear regression analysis showed correlation between the upper C7 slope and T1 slope (R = 0.818, P < 0.01) and, lower C7 slope and T1 slope (R = 0.840, P < 0.01). T1 slope significantly correlated with neck tilt, TIA, C2-C7 angle, cSVA, cervical and cranial tilt, but not with the C1 inclination, C2 slope, and ADI. Upper and lower C7 slopes showed the close resemblance with T1 slope in terms of correlation with those parameters.

CONCLUSION

Both, upper and lower C7 slope correlated strongly with T1 slope and showed similar relationship with cervical balance parameters as T1 slope. Therefore, C7 slope could potentially substitute T1 slope, especially upper C7 slope due to the good visibility.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

ISSLS PRIZE IN BIOENGINEERING SCIENCE 2018: dynamic imaging of degenerative spondylolisthesis reveals mid-range dynamic lumbar instability not evident on static clinical radiographs

PURPOSE

Degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) in the setting of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis is commonly treated with spinal fusion in addition to decompression with laminectomy. However, recent studies have shown similar clinical outcomes after decompression alone, suggesting that a subset of DS patients may not require spinal fusion. Identification of dynamic instability could prove useful for predicting which patients are at higher risk of post-laminectomy destabilization necessitating fusion. The goal of this study was to determine if static clinical radiographs adequately characterize dynamic instability in patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) and to compare the rotational and translational kinematics in vivo during continuous dynamic flexion activity in DS versus asymptomatic age-matched controls.

METHODS

Seven patients with symptomatic single level lumbar DS (6 M, 1 F; 66 ± 5.0 years) and seven age-matched asymptomatic controls (5 M, 2 F age 63.9 ± 6.4 years) underwent biplane radiographic imaging during continuous torso flexion. A volumetric model-based tracking system was used to track each vertebra in the radiographic images using subject-specific 3D bone models from high-resolution computed tomography (CT). In vivo continuous dynamic sagittal rotation (flexion/extension) and AP translation (slip) were calculated and compared to clinical measures of intervertebral flexion/extension and AP translation obtained from standard lateral flexion/extension radiographs.

RESULTS

Static clinical radiographs underestimate the degree of AP translation seen on dynamic in vivo imaging (1.0 vs 3.1 mm; p = 0.03). DS patients demonstrated three primary motion patterns compared to a single kinematic pattern in asymptomatic controls when analyzing continuous dynamic in vivo imaging. 3/7 (42%) of patients with DS demonstrated aberrant mid-range motion.

CONCLUSION

Continuous in vivo dynamic imaging in DS reveals a spectrum of aberrant motion with significantly greater kinematic heterogeneity than previously realized that is not readily seen on current clinical imaging.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V data These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

A Comparative Study of Decompressive Laminectomy and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Grade I Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

BACKGROUND

For Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS), both decompression alone and decompression with fusion are effective surgical treatments. Which of the two techniques is superior is still under debate. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes after decompression alone versus decompression with fusion for Grade I DLS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

139 patients who underwent surgery for Grade I DLS at L4-L5 were prospectively enrolled. Decompression alone was used to treat 74 patients, and decompression with fusion was used to treat 65 patients. Six patients in the first group and four patients in the second group were lost during the 2-year followup. Demographic data were recorded. Operation time, perioperative blood loss, total blood transfusion volume, and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Back pain and functional outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), respectively.

RESULTS

Baseline demographic data were not different between the two groups. Operation time, blood loss, total blood transfusion volume, and length of hospital stay were all significantly greater in the fusion group than in the decompression group. This would be expected because fusion is the more invasive procedure. VAS scores were not different up until 6 months postoperatively. Twelve months after surgery, however, VAS scores were significantly lower in the fusion group. The same results were shown in terms of ODI. Although ODI decreased in both groups over time, the fusion group showed better functional outcomes than did the decompression group.

CONCLUSIONS

Although both decompression alone and decompression with fusion improved functional outcomes for Grade I DLS, fusion surgery resulted in better results compared to decompression alone. Therefore, fusion should be considered as the treatment of choice for Grade I DLS.

MRI kinematic analysis of T1 sagittal motion between cervical flexion and extension positions in 145 patients

PURPOSE

Although the T1 vertebra is considered as an important factor of cervical balance, little is known about its motion between flexion and extension. The purpose of present study was to analyze the T1 sagittal motion using kinematic magnetic resonance imaging (kMRI), and to identify factors that relate to T1 sagittal motion.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 145 kMR images taken in weight-bearing neutral, flexion and extension positions. Cervical balance parameters were evaluated in each position. The degree of T1 sagittal motion was defined as [(T1 slope at extension) - (T1 slope at flexion)]. All patients were divided into three groups: Positive group (T1 followed the head motion, T1 sagittal motion > 5°), Stable group (5 ≥, ≥ - 5) and Negative group (T1 moved in the opposite direction from the head motion, > - 5). The groups were compared and multivariate logistic regression analysis was calculated.

RESULTS

There were 57 (40%) patients in the positive, 56 (39%) in the stable and 32 (22%) in the negative group. The positive group had the largest C2-7 sagittal vertical axis in flexion (p < 0.001) and the shortest in the extension (p = 0.023). Similar trends were seen in cranial tilt and cervical tilt. The value of T1 height < 27 mm was a significant independent factor for the negative group (p = 0.008, adjusted odds ratio = 5.958).

CONCLUSION

Based on T1 sagittal motion, 40% of the patients were classified in positive group (the T1 vertebra followed the head motion in flexion and extension), and 20% were classified in the negative group (the T1 vertebra moved in the opposite direction from the head motion). T1 height < 27 mm was a potential predictor of negative group.

Is lumbar facet joint tropism developmental or secondary to degeneration? An international, large-scale multicenter study by the AOSpine Asia Pacific Research Collaboration Consortium

BACKGROUND

Facet joint tropism is asymmetry in orientation of the bilateral facets. Some studies have shown that tropism may increase the risk of disc degeneration and herniations, as well as degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). It remains controversial whether tropism is a pre-existing developmental phenomena or secondary to progressive remodeling of the joint structure due to degenerative changes. As such, the following study addressed the occurrence of tropism of the lower lumbar spine (i.e. L3-S1) in a degenerative spondylolisthesis patient model.

METHODS

An international, multi-center cross-sectional study that consisted of 349 patients with single level DS recruited from 33 spine institutes in the Asia Pacific region was performed. Axial MRI/CT from L3-S1 were utilized to assess left and right facet joint sagittal angulation in relation to the coronal plane. The angulation difference between the bilateral facets was obtained. Tropism was noted if there was 8° or greater angulation difference between the facet joints. Tropism was noted at levels of DS and compared to immediate adjacent and distal non-DS levels, if applicable, to the index level. Age, sex-type and body mass index (BMI) were also noted and assessed in relation to tropism.

RESULTS

Of the 349 subjects, there were 63.0 % females, the mean age was 61.8 years and the mean BMI was 25.6 kg/m(2). Overall, 9.7, 76.5 and 13.8 % had L3-L4, L4-L5 and L5-S1 DS, respectively. Tropism was present in 47.1, 50.6 and 31.3 % of L3-L4, L4-L5 and L5-S1 of levels with DS, respectively. Tropism involved 33.3 to 50.0 % and 33.3 to 58.8 % of the immediate adjacent and most distal non-DS levels from the DS level, respectively. Patient demographics were not found to be significantly related to tropism at any level (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

To the authors' knowledge, this is one of the largest studies conducted, in particular in an Asian population, addressing facet joint tropism. Although levels with DS were noted to have tropism, immediate adjacent and distal levels with no DS also exhibited tropism, and were not related to age and other patient demographics. This study suggests that facet joint tropism or perhaps subsets of facet joint orientation may have a pre-disposed orientation that may be developmental in origin or a combination with secondary changes due to degenerative/slip effects. The presence of tropism should be noted in all imaging assessments, which may have implications in treatment decision-making, prognostication of disease progression, and predictive modeling. Having a deeper understanding of such concepts may further elaborate on the precision phenotyping of the facets and their role in more personalized spine care. Additional prospective and controlled studies are needed to further validate the findings.

Influence of T1 Slope on the Cervical Sagittal Balance in Degenerative Cervical Spine: An Analysis Using Kinematic MRI

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective kinematic magnetic resonance imaging (kMRI) study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the utility of kMRI in determining the relationship between cervical sagittal balance and TI alignment.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Thoracic inlet parameters play an important role in cervical spine sagittal balance. However, most of the literature is based on lower resolution cervical X-rays or CT scans in the supine position.

METHODS

Cervical spine kMRI of 83 patients with degenerative cervical spine conditions (20-68 yr of age) was analyzed for: (1) cervical spine parameters: C2-C7 angle, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), cranial tilt, and cervical tilt; and (2) T1 parameters: thoracic inlet angle (TIA), T1 slope, and neck tilt (NT). Multiple logistic regression analysis and Pearson correlation coefficients were performed.

RESULTS

The mean TIA, T1 slope, and NT were 78.0, 33.2, and 44.8°, respectively. The mean C2-7 angle, SVA of C2-C7, cervical tilt, and cranial tilt were -15.4°, 22.0 mm, 18.1°, and 15.1°, respectively. The ratio of cervical:cranial tilt was maintained as 55:45%. A significant correlation was found between the C2-C7 angle and T1 slope (r = 0.731), TIA and C2-C7 angle (r = 0.406), cervical tilt with C2-C7 angle (r = 0.671), T1 slope with TIA (r = 0.429), TIA with neck tilt (r = 0.733), TIA with cervical tilt (r = 0.377), SVA C2-C7 with cervical tilt (r = -0.480), SVA C2-C7 with cranial tilt (r = 0.912), and C2-7 SVA with the ratio of cranial tilt to cervical tilt (r = 0.694).

CONCLUSION

An individual with a large T1 slope required large cervical lordosis to preserve physiologic sagittal balance of the cervical spine. Cranial tilt was the cervical parameter most strongly correlated with SVA C2-C7, and thus may be a good parameter to assess decompensation of cervical sagittal balance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.