What Happens to Sagittal Alignment Following Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy and Fusion?

OBJECTIVE

Laminectomy and fusion (LF) and laminoplasty (LP) are 2 sucessful posterior decompression techniques for cervical myelo-radiculopathy. There is also a growing body of evidence describing the importance of cervical sagittal alignment (CSA) and its importance in outcomes. We investigated the difference between pre- and postoperative CSA parameters in and between LF or LP. Furthermore, we studied predictive variables associated with change in cervical mismatch (CM).

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of adults with cervical myeloradiculopathy in a single healthcare system. The primary outcomes are intra- and inter-cohort comparison of LF versus LP radiographic parameters at pre- and postoperative time points. A secondary multivariable analysis of predictive factors was performed evaluating factors predicting postoperative CM.

RESULTS

Eighty nine patients were included; 38 (43%) had LF and 51 (57%) underwent LP. Both groups decreased in lordosis (LF 11.4° vs. 4.9°, P = 0.01; LP 15.2° vs. 9.1°, P < 0.001), increased in cSVA (LF 3.4 vs. 4.2 cm, P = 0.01; LP 3.2 vs. 4.2 cm, P < 0.001), and increased in CM (LF 22.0° vs. 28.5°, P = 0.02; LP 16.8° vs. 22.3°, P = 0.002). There were no significant differences in the postoperative CSA between groups. No significant predictors of change in pre- and postoperative CM were found.

CONSLUSIONS

There were no significant pre-or postoperative differences following the 2 procedures, suggesting radiographic equipoise in well indicated patients. Across all groups, lordosis decreased, cSVA increased, and cervical mismatch increased. There were no predictive factors that led to change in cervical mismatch.

Early radiographic outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with anatomic versus lordotic cages

Background

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) interbody implants are shaped anatomically, with a convex superior aspect, or lordotically, with an angle and flat surfaces. However, the effect of implant shape on cervical sagittal balance (CSB) is not well described.

Methods

Of the 192 cases reviewed from 2018 to 2019, 118 were included with matching pre- and postoperative imaging. Cases were categorized by interbody implant type (anatomic or lordotic) and number of levels fused (1-level, 2-level, etc.). SurgiMap was used to measure cervical lordosis (CL), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), T1 slope (T1S), and T1S minus CL (T1S-CL) on pre- and postoperative imaging. Pre- and postoperative parameters were compared within and between each cohort. Change in CL (ΔCL), cSVA (ΔcSVA), and T1S-CL (ΔT1S-CL) were calculated as the difference between pre- and postoperative values and were compared accordingly (1) anatomic versus lordotic and (2) 1-level versus 2-level versus 3-level fusion.

Results

Thirty-nine (33.1%), 57 (48.3%), and 22 (18.6%) cases comprised the anatomic, lordotic, and mixed (anatomic and lordotic) groups, respectively. ACDFs improved CL and T1S-CL by 5.71° (p<.001) and 3.32° (p<.01), respectively. CL was improved in the lordotic (5.27°; p<.01) and anatomic (4.57°; p<.01) groups, while only the lordotic group demonstrated improvement in T1S-CL (3.4°; p=.02). There were no differences in ΔCL (p=.70), ΔcSVA (p=.89), or ΔT1S-CL (p=.1) between the groups. Two- and 3-level fusions improved CL by 7.48° (p<.01) and 9.62° (p<.01), and T1S-CL by 4.43° (p<.01) and 5.96° (p<.01), respectively.

Conclusions

Overall, ACDFs significantly improved CL and T1S-CL however, there were no differences in CSB correction between the anatomic and lordotic groups. Two- and 3-level fusions more effectively improved CL (vs. single-level) and T1S-CL (vs. 3-level). These results suggest that implants should continue to be personalized to the patient's anatomy, however, future research is needed to validate these findings and incorporate the effects of preoperative deformities.

Usefulness of the preoperative thoracic inlet angle in comparison to the T1 slope for predicting cervical kyphosis after laminoplasty

PURPOSE

Thoracic inlet angle (TIA) is a sagittal radiographic parameter with a constant value regardless of posture and is significantly correlated with the sagittal balance of the cervical spine. However, the practical use of TIA has not been studied. This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of the preoperative TIA for predicting the development of kyphotic deformity after cervical laminoplasty in comparison to the preoperative T1 slope (T1S).

METHODS

A total of 98 patients who underwent cervical laminoplasty without preoperative kyphotic alignment were included (mean age, 73.7 years; 41.8% female). Radiography was evaluated before surgery and at the 2-year follow-up examination. The cervical sagittal parameters were measured on standing radiographs, and the TIA was measured on T2-weighted MRI in a supine position. Cervical alignment with a C2-C7 angle of ≥ 0° was defined as lordosis, and that with an angle of < 0° was defined as kyphosis.

RESULTS

Postoperative kyphosis occurred in 11 patients (11.2%). Preoperatively, the kyphosis group showed significantly lower values in the T1S (23.5° vs. 30.3°, p = 0.034) and TIA (76.1° vs. 81.8°, p = 0.042). We performed ROC curve analysis to clarify the impact of the preoperative TIA and T1S on kyphotic deformity after laminoplasty. The optimal cutoff angles for TIA and T1S were 68° and 19°, respectively, with similar diagnostic accuracy.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the clinical utility of the preoperative TIA for predicting the risk of postoperative kyphotic deformity after cervical laminoplasty. These findings suggest the importance of the preoperative assessment of thoracic inlet alignment in cervical spine surgery.

The Impact of Cervical Degeneration and Sagittal Balance on Retro-Odontoid Soft-Tissue Thickness

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether retro-odontoid soft-tissue thickness (ROSTT) is associated with cervical degeneration, cervical spine mobility, and sagittal balance of cervical spine.

METHODS

The data of 151 patients who presented at our hospital with cervical spondylosis were reviewed. The ROSTT was measured using T1-weighted sagittal cervical magnetic resonance imaging findings. The assessment of the degree of cervical intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) was conducted using sagittal T2-weighted imaging. The T1 slope (T1S), C0-C2 angle, C1-C2 angle, C2-C7 angle, C1-C7 sagittal vertical axis and C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis were measured. The range of motion was assessed by measuring the flexion-extension radiographs. According to the ROSTT, those measuring less than 3 mm were classified as normal group and those measuring larger than 3 mm were classified as thickened group.

RESULTS

The thickened group had larger cervical IVDD grade, age, C2-C7 angle, and T1S compared to the normal group (all P < 0.05). Additionally, the C0-C2 angle was significantly smaller in the thickened group than in the normal group (P < 0.05). ROSTT showed a negative correlation with C0-C2 angle (r = -0.181, P < 0.05), but positive correlations with both C2-C7 angle (r = 0.255, P < 0.05) and T1S (r = 0.240, P < 0.05). Furthermore, ROSTT was positively correlated with age (r = 0277, P < 0.05) and cervical IVDD grade (Spearman, r = 0.299, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical sagittal balance and cervical degeneration have a significant impact on ROSTT. Patients with a higher T1S and severe cervical degeneration are more likely to result in greater ROSTT.

A novel classification that defines the normal cervical spine: an analysis based on 632 asymptomatic Chinese volunteers

PURPOSE

The "normal" cervical spine may be non-lordotic shapes and the cervical spine alignment targets are less well established. So, the study was to propose novel classification for cervical spine morphologies with Chinese asymptomatic subjects, and to address cervical balance status based on the classification.

METHOD

An overall 632 asymptomatic individuals on cervical spine were selected from January 2020 to December 2022, with six age groups from 20-30 year to 70 plus group. Cervical alignment contained C2-7 cervical lordosis (C2-7 CL) and T1 slope (T1S), together with C1-2 CL, C2-4 CL, C5-7 CL, C2S, cervical sagittal vertical axis (CSVA), thoracic inlet angle (TIA) and neck tilt (NT). C2-7 cervical lordosis was regarded as primary outcomes. To identify groups with similar cervical alignment parameters, a 2-step cluster analysis was performed.

RESULTS

C2-7 CL, T1S, CSVA, TIA and NT increased by age and mean value of them were larger in male than female group. Four unique clusters of female lordotic cluster, female kyphotic cluster, male lordotic cluster and male kyphotic cluster were classified mainly based on gender and C2-C7 CL. T1S was the independent influencing factor for C2-7 CL in all individuals and C2-7 CL = -28.65 + 0.57 × TIA, which varied from clusters. Although interactions among cervical parameters, it showed the alignment was more coordinated in lordotic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The cervical sagittal profile varied with age and gender. Four clusters were naturally classified based on C2-7 CL and gender. The cervical balance status was addressed by C2-7 CL =  - 28.65 + 0.57 × TIA.

Risk Factors for Postoperative Loss of Lordosis, Cervical Kyphosis, and Sagittal Imbalance After Cervical Laminoplasty

OBJECTIVE

A retrospective cohort study was undertaken to elucidate the risk factors of loss of cervical lordosis (LCL), kyphotic deformity, and sagittal imbalance after cervical laminoplasty.

METHODS

A total of 108 patients who underwent laminoplasty to treat cervical myelopathy and were followed for ≥2 years were included. Logistic regression analysis and multiple regression analysis were performed to identify preoperative risk factors of LCL, kyphotic deformity (cervical lordosis <0°), and sagittal imbalance (sagittal vertical axis >40 mm) at postoperative 2 years.

RESULTS

Within multivariate multiple regression analysis, C2-C7 lordosis (P = 0.002), and C2-C7 extension capacity (P<0.001) showed significant association with LCL. Furthermore, age (P = 0.043) and C2-C7 lordosis (P = 0.038) were significantly associated with postoperative kyphosis. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for postoperative kyphosis showed that preoperative C2-C7 lordosis of 10.5° had a sensitivity and specificity of 81.3% and 82.4%, respectively. Preoperative K-line tilt (P = 0.034) showed a significant association with postoperative cervical sagittal imbalance at postoperative 2 years. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that a K-line tilt cutoff value of 12.5° had a sensitivity and specificity of 78.6% and 77.7%, respectively, for predicting postoperative sagittal imbalance.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher preoperative C2-C7 lordosis and less preoperative cervical extension capacity were risk factors of LCL. Small preoperative C2-C7 lordosis <10.5° and younger age were risk factors of postoperative kyphosis. Furthermore, a greater K-line tilt would increase the risk of postoperative sagittal imbalance, with a cutoff value of 12.5°.

Reciprocal Change of Cervical Spine after Posterior Spinal Fusion for Lenke Type 1 and 2 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Reciprocal sagittal alignment changes after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) posterior corrective surgery have been reported in the cervical spine, but the evidence is not yet sufficient. Furthermore, much remains unknown about the effects of cervical kyphosis on clinical outcomes in AIS. Forty-five consecutive patients (4 males and 41 females) with AIS and Lenke type 1 or 2 curves underwent a posterior spinal fusion, and a minimum of 24-month follow-up was collected from our prospective database. We investigated radiographic parameters and SRS-22r. Before surgery, cervical kyphosis (cervical lordosis < 0°) was present in 89% and cervical hyperkyphosis (cervical lordosis < -10°) in 60%. There were no significant differences in age, sex, or Lenke type between the hyperkyphosis and the non-hyperkyphosis groups. Although cervical lordosis increased significantly after surgery, cervical kyphosis was observed in 73% of patients 2 years after surgery. We found a significant correlation between Δthoracic kyphosis (TK) and Δcervical lordosis. Preoperative cervical kyphosis, ΔT1 slope, and ΔTK were independently associated factors for postoperative cervical hyperkyphosis. The cervical hyperkyphosis group had significantly lower SRS-22r domains. In AIS corrective surgery, restoring TK leading to a gain of T1 slope may lead to an improvement of cervical sagittal alignment. Remaining cervical hyperkyphosis after AIS surgery may affect clinical outcomes.

Effect of T1 Slope on Disappearance of Cervical Lordosis after Posterior Cervical Double-Door Laminoplasty Based on Medical Informatics

Cervical sagittal balance plays a pivotal role in spine surgeries as it has a significant impact on the clinical outcomes in cervical spine surgery. Image processing techniques have significantly improved the accuracy and precision of cervical surgical techniques. This study aims to investigate the effects of T1 slope (T1s) on the disappearance of cervical lordosis after posterior cervical double-door laminoplasty using medical informatics and radiographic measures. To do so, we determined and measured the loss of T1s and cervical lordosis during the postoperative follow-up period in patients with double-door posterior cervical laminoplasty. Patients (n = 40) who underwent posterior cervical double-door laminoplasty participated in this study. For all patients, the difference between the preoperative T1s (angle between the upper edge of T1 and the horizontal line) and preoperative and postoperative cervical lordosis (Cobb method) was estimated, and the linear relationship between the two was statistically analyzed to observe the influence of preoperative T1s on postoperative cervical lordosis disappearance. The average preoperative T1s was 23.54°, and the average preoperative cervical lordosis angle was 8.50°. After 1-20 months of follow-up (mean = 9.53 months), the average postoperative cervical lordosis was 8.50°, and the average loss of cervical lordosis was 0.22°. Twenty cases had different degrees of lordosis angle loss after the operation, with an average loss of 9.31°. All patients were divided into groups A and B, according to a mean value of T1s = 23.54°, of which T1S > 23.54° was group A and T1s < 23.54 was group B. Cervical lordosis was quantified by the C2-C7 Cobb angle. The Cobb angle difference of cervical lordosis was measured before and after the operation, and its correlation with preoperative T1s was assessed. The preoperative Cobb angle and cervical curvature changes in the two groups were statistically compared, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The group with a T1s > 23.54° had greater loss of preoperative Cobb angle and cervical curvature. In group A, the mean preoperative cervical disability index (NDI) was 32.4 ± 3.4, and the mean postoperative NDI score was 16.5 ± 2.1. The mean preoperative VAS scores of neck pain and neck pain were 5.41 ± 1.1 and 5.55 ± 0.3, respectively, and the improvement in neck pain was -0.2%. The mean preoperative NDI in group B was 30.1 ± 2.9, and the mean postoperative NDI score was 11.5 ± 3.1. The mean VAS score for preoperative neck pain was 5.11 ± 1.2, that for postoperative neck pain was 4.18 ± 0.7, and that for neck pain improved by 18%. There was a significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05). The disappearance of cervical lordosis after posterior cervical double-door laminoplasty is an important cause of postoperative cervical spine pain. The T1s is meaningful for predicting the loss of postoperative curvature in patients undergoing posterior cervical double-door laminoplasty. This is especially true for patients with good preoperative cervical curvature without ankylosis and kyphosis but with a wide T1s.

Can C7 Slope Accurately Substitute for an Invisible T1 Slope According to Age and Cervical Morphology in Cervical Lateral Radiographs?

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective radiologic study.

OBJECTIVES

To identify age-associated changes in T1 slope (T1S) and C7 slope (C7S), as well as the difference between T1S and C7S (△, which was defined as T1S minus C7S) and to explore the cervical morphology that C7S can be the most accurate alternative for the invisible T1S.

METHODS

625 asymptomatic Chinese volunteers received cervical lateral radiographs from August 2021 to May 2022. Occipito-C2 angle (O-C2), C2-7 angle (C2-7), cranial arch, caudal arch, C7S, and T1S were examined. Thereafter, the △ was established. The correlations among T1S, C7S, △ and other cervical sagittal parameters, and between age and other cervical sagittal parameters were evaluated with the Pearson correlation coefficient analysis. Then, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to compare variations in cervical sagittal parameters among volunteers aged 40 to 59 years, 60 to 64 years, 65 to 69 years, 70 to 74 years, and ≥75 years of age, and among volunteers with 1 lordotic morphology, 2 lordotic morphology, straight morphology, kyphotic morphology, 1 sigmoid morphology, and 2 sigmoid morphology. Linear regression modeling of the correlation between C7S and T1S in various cervical alignment patterns was then established.

RESULTS

△ had the strongest correlation with caudal arch (r = .646), and weakest correlation with cranial arch (r = -.082). Age was significantly correlated with T1S (r = .250), C7S (r = .244), and △ (r = .112). Among them, △ was stable until 74 years after which it showed an elevation from 3.3° in the group 70-74 years to 4.1° in the group over 75 years. Moreover, there was marked variation between T1S and C7S at 1 lordotic, 2 lordotic, straight and 2 sigmoid alignment patterns, but no difference was seen between T1S and C7S at kyphotic and 1 sigmoid alignment patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a progressive increase in T1S, C7S, and △ with age. Linear regression equations for accurate prediction of T1S were developed based on the C7S in 1 lordotic, 2 lordotic, straight and 2 sigmoid alignment patterns. C7S may be a reliable proxy for T1S in kyphotic and 1 sigmoid alignment patterns.

Factors related to T1 slope: spinopelvic balance and thoracic compensation

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors associated with T1 slope (T1S).

METHODS

A total of 215 patients over 18 years old who underwent whole-spine X-rays to evaluate lower back pain were enrolled in this study. T1S, pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), cervical lordosis (CL), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were measured. Patients were divided into balance, compensatory balance, thoracic compensation, and thoracic decompensation groups.

RESULTS

TK (p < 0.001), SVA (p < 0.001), and CL (p = 0.020) were significantly related to high T1S. The balance group had the smallest PT, largest SS and largest LL of the four groups (p < 0.001). The thoracic compensation group had the smallest TK of all groups (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in T1S between the balance and thoracic compensation groups (p = 0.099). The thoracic decompensation group had a larger T1S than the balance group (p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Caudal spine segments had a sequential effect on cranial spine segments. T1S reflected the compensation ability of the spine. The absence of balance tended to increase the T1S. Pelvic posterior rotation and thoracic compensation were two crucial factors protecting against increased T1S in patients with ASD.

[Multivariate correlation analysis of T1S and C7S]

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether C₇ angles (C₇ slope, C₇S) could replace T₁ angles (T₁ slope, T₁S) by correlation analysis of T₁S and C₇S.

METHODS

A total of 442 patients from July 2015 to July 2020 in outpatient and inpatient department were enrolled retrospectively, and 259 patients who could identify the upper endplate of T₁ were screened out . Of them, there were 145 males and 114 females, aged from 20 to 83 years old with an average of (58.6±11.2) years, including 163 patients with cervical spine surgery and 96 non-surgical patients. Patients were stratified by sex, age, cervical kyphosis, cervical alignment imbalance, and cervical spine surgery. These 259 patients included 145 cases in the male group, 114 cases in the female group;76 cases in the youth group (<40 years old), 109 cases in the middle-aged group (40 to 60 years old), and 74 cases in the elderly group(>60 years old); 92 cases in the cervical kyphosis group, 167 cases in the non-kyphosis group;51 cases in the cervical sequence imbalance group, 208 cases in the non-imbalance group;163 cases in the cervical surgery group, 96 cases in the non-operation group. The correlations of C₇S and T₁S in various modalities groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 442 patients, the recognition rate of upper endplate of T₁ was 58.6%(259/442), and that of C₇ was 90.7%. The mean T₁S and C₇S of the 259 patients were (24.5±8.0)° [(25.9±7.7)° in the male group and (23.7±6.9)° in the female group] and (20.8±7.3)° [(22.5±7.5)° in the male group and(19.7±5.8)° in the female group], respectively. The total correlation coefficient between C₇S and T₁S was r=0.89, R²=0.79, and the linear regression equation was T₁S=0.91×C₇S+4.35. In the above general information and the grouping of deformity factors, T₁S was highly correlated with C₇S(r value 0.85 to 0.92, P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

There is a high correlation between T₁S and C₇S in different factor groups. For cases where T₁S cannot be measured, C₇S can be used to provide guidance and reference for evaluating the sagittal balance of the spine, analyzing the condition, and formulating surgical plans.

Cervical Sagittal Alignment and Balance Associated With Aging Chinese Adults: A Radiographic Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort radiographic study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the age- and gender-related normative values and correlation of cervical sagittal parameters in asymptomatic Chinese adults, and to explore the changes and compensating mechanisms across different age groups.

METHODS

The asymptomatic subjects were divided into 6 groups according to age and then one-way analysis of variance was used to compare the multiple sets of cervical sagittal parameters among the different age groups. Independent t-tests were performed to compare the sagittal parameters among different gender and different cervical spine alignments. Relationships between each parameter were tested by Pearson's correlation. Linear regression analysis based on T1 slope (T1S) and C2 slope (C2S) was used to provide an equation to predict normal cervical alignment.

RESULTS

Mean values of each cervical sagittal parameter were presented based on age and gender. There were positive correlations between age and cervical lordosis (CL) (r = -.278, P < .001), T1S (r = .271, P < .001), cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) (r = .218, P < .001), C2-C4 Cobb angle (r = -.283, P < .001), horacic inlet angle (TIA) (r = .443, P < .001), and neck tilt (NT) (r = .354, P < .001). Older groups (aged >50 years) had greater T1 Slope, C2S, and TIA. The C2-C4 Cobb angle maintained a steadily increasing trend and significantly increased in the older adult groups (P < .05), while the C5-C7 Cobb angle was relatively constant. Mean values of parameters were larger in males (P > .05). Linear regression analysis indicated a strong association between T1S and CL (R2 = .551, standard error 1.16°), T1S and C5-7 (R2 = .372; P < .001), and C2S and C2-4 (R2 = .309; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Normative values of cervical sagittal parameters vary by age and sex. The CL, cSVA, and T1S, C2-4 Cobb angle changed with increasing age, and it can influence the recruitment of compensation mechanism. Normative CL of Chinese adults was predicted by the equation CL = T1S-14.7° ± 1.2°, which could serve as a reference when planning for cervical surgery.

The relationship between cervical sagittal balance and type of atlantoaxial dislocation secondary to os odontoideum

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effect of cervical sagittal balance on the direction and type of atlantoaxial dislocation.

METHODS

Data of 55 patients seen at our hospital for atlantoaxial instability/dislocation caused by os odontoideum were reviewed. Radiographic variables, including T1 slope (T1S), C1-C2 angle, C2-C7 angle, C1-C2 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), C2-C7 SVA, and atlanto-dens interval (ADI), were measured preoperatively. Patients were divided into three groups according to ADI: anterior atlantoaxial dislocation, atlantoaxial instability, and posterior atlantoaxial dislocation. Differences within and between groups in radiographic variables and relationships between the investigated variables were analyzed.

RESULTS

ADI was strongly negatively associated with C1-C2 angle (r= -0.805, P<0.05); whereas ADI had a medium-strength positive relationship with C2-C7 angle (r=0.425, P<0.05) and a medium-strength negative relationship with C2-C7 SVA (r= -0.411, P <0.05). However, ADI was not significantly correlated with T1S (r= -0.092, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The type and direction of atlantoaxial dislocation is closely associated with cervical sagittal balance. C2-C7 SVA is an important factor in assessing the direction of atlantoaxial subluxation secondary to os odontoideum. ADI decreases with increasing C2-C7 SVA. The larger the C2-C7 SVA, the more likely the atlantoaxial dislocation is to be posterior.

Influence of Preoperative T1-Slope and Cervical Sagittal Vertical Axis on Postoperative Cervical Sagittal Alignment Following Posterior Cervical Laminoplasty

BACKGROUND

Assess correlation between preoperative cervical sagittal alignment (T1 slope [T1S] and C2-C7 cervical sagittal vertical axis [cSVA]) and postoperative cervical sagittal balance after posterior cervical laminoplasty.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent laminoplasty at a single institution with >6 weeks postoperative follow-up were divided into 4 groups based on preoperative cSVA and T1S (Group 1: cSVA <4 cm/T1S <20°; Group 2: cSVA ≥4 cm/T1S ≥20°; Group 3: cSVA <4 cm/T1S ≥20°; Group 4: cSVA <4 cm/T1S <20°). Radiographic analyses were conducted at 3 timepoints, and changes in cSVA, C2-C7 cervical lordosis (CL), and T1S -CL were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 214 patients met inclusion criteria (28 patients had cSVA <4 cm/T1S <20° [Group 1]; 47 patients had cSVA ≥4 cm/T1S ≥20° [Group 2]; 139 patients had cSVA <4 cm/T1S ≥20° [Group 3]). No patients had cSVA ≥4 cm/T1S <20° (Group 4). Patients either had a C4-C6 (60.7%) or C3-C6 (39.3%) laminoplasty. Mean follow-up was 1.6 ± 1.32 years. For all patients, mean cSVA increased 6 mm postoperatively. cSVA significantly increased postoperatively for both groups with a preoperative cSVA <4 cm (ie, Groups 1 and 3 [P < 0.01]). For all patients, mean CL decreased 2° postoperatively. Groups 1 and 2 had significant differences in preoperative CL but nonsignificant differences at 6 weeks (P = 0.41) and last follow-up (P = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

Cervical laminoplasty resulted in a mean decrease in CL. Patients with high preoperative T1S, irrespective of cSVA, were at risk of loss of CL postoperatively. While patients with low preoperative T1S and cSVA <4 cm experienced a decrease in global sagittal cervical alignment, CL was not jeopardized.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The results of this study may facilitate preoperative planning for patients undergoing posterior cervical laminoplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Clinical significance of the C2 slope after multilevel cervical spine fusion

OBJECTIVE

The C2 slope (C2S) is one of the parameters that can determine cervical sagittal alignment, but its clinical significance is relatively unexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of the C2S after multilevel cervical spine fusion.

METHODS

A total of 111 patients who underwent multilevel cervical spine fusion were included in this study. The C2S, cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), C2-7 lordosis, and T1 slope (T1S) were measured in standing lateral cervical spine radiographs preoperatively and 2 years after the surgery. Clinical outcome measures were visual analog scale (VAS) neck and arm pain scores, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scale score, and patient-reported subjective improvement rate (IR) percentage. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired-samples t-test and Pearson's correlation, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to determine the cutoff values of C2S.

RESULTS

C2S demonstrated a significant correlation with the cSVA, C2-7 lordosis, T1S, and T1S minus cervical lordosis. C2S revealed a significant correlation with the JOA, neck pain VAS, and NDI scores at 2 years after surgery. Change in the C2S correlated with postoperative neck pain and NDI scores. ROC curves demonstrated the cutoff values of C2S as 18.8°, 22.25°, and 25.35°, according to a cSVA of 40 mm, severe disability expressed by NDI, and severe myelopathy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

C2S can be an additional cervical sagittal alignment parameter that can be a useful prognostic factor after multilevel cervical spine fusion.

Relationship between Intervertebral Disc Compression Force and Sagittal Spinopelvic Lower Limb Alignment in Elderly Women in Standing Position with Patient-Specific Whole Body Musculoskeletal Model

The intervertebral disc loading based on compensated standing posture in patients with adult spinal deformity remains unclear. We analyzed the relationship between sagittal alignment and disc compression force (Fm). In 14 elderly women, the alignment of the sagittal spinopelvic and lower extremities was measured. Fm was calculated using the Anybody Modeling System. Patients were divided into low sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and high SVA groups. Comparisons between the two groups were performed and the relationship between the Fm and each parameter was examined using Spearman's correlation coefficient (r). The mean lumbar Fm in the high SVA group was 67.6%; significantly higher than that in the low SVA group (p = 0.046). There was a negative correlation between cervical Fm with T1 slope (r = -0.589, p = 0.034) and lumbar Fm with lumbar lordosis (r = -0.566, p = 0.035). Lumbar Fm was positively correlated with center of gravity-SVA (r = 0.615, p = 0.029), T1 slope (r = 0.613, p = 0.026), and SVA (r = 0.612, p = 0.020). The results suggested sagittal malalignment increased the load on the thoracolumbar and lower lumbar discs and was associated with cervical disc loading.

Impact of C3 Involvement on Postoperative Kyphosis Following Cervical Laminoplasty: A Comparison Between High and Low T1 Slope

BACKGROUND

The goal of the present study was to investigate the impact of C3 involvement on the postoperative kyphosis following cervical laminoplasty in patients with high and low T1S.

METHODS

The data from ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament patients who had undergone laminoplasty between January 2016 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into low-and high-T1S groups according to preoperative T1S, and the postoperative alignment change was compared between the groups. The relationships between postoperative cervical kyphosis and preoperative variables, including gender, C3 laminoplasty, T1S, cervical lordosis (CL), C2-7 Sagittal Vertical Axis, and T1S minus CL (T1S-CL) were investigated.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients were divided into 2 groups above and below median preoperative T1S (23.70). There were thirty-three patients (38.3%) in low-T1S group and fifty-three patients (61.7%) in high-T1S group. Twenty-three patients (26.7%) were performed with C3 involved laminoplasty. C3 laminoplasty (odds ratio [OR], 9.67; 2.82-33.16; P = 0.000), high T1S (OR, 4.89; 1.54-15.49; P = 0.007), and mismatched T1S-CL (OR, 5.96; 1.83-19.43; P = 0.003) were significantly associated with postoperative kyphosis. In high-T1S group, the loss of CL was significant (P = 0.017) when C3 laminoplasty was performed, whereas, in low-T1S group, the C3 laminoplasty did not show the statistically significant difference. (P = 0.194).

CONCLUSIONS

C3 laminoplasty, mismatched T1S-CL, and high T1S were found to increase the risk of postoperative kyphosis following cervical laminoplasty. Patients with high T1 slope tended to exhibit a greater loss of CL when the laminoplasty was performed extending to C3 segment.

Analysis of the Risk Factors for C5 Nerve Palsy After Cervical Posterior Open-Door Laminoplasty for Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy-From the Perspective of Cervical Sagittal Parameters

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to explore the sagittal radiological parameters related to the occurrence of C5 nerve palsy after cervical posterior open-door laminoplasty for the patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients who underwent cervical posterior open-door laminoplasty were reviewed retrospectively from March 2017 to March 2022. The C2-7 Cobb angle, C2-7 sagittal vertex axis, thoracic inlet angle, neck tilt, T1 slope, and encroachment ratio of ossification were measured on X-rays. The enrolled patients were divided into C5 nerve palsy and control groups. Logistic regression was performed to analyze the potential risk factors for the occurrence of C5 nerve palsy. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the significance of the results and the optimal diagnostic value.

RESULTS

The results of logistic regression showed that only the T1 slope and encroachment ratio were variables that were responsible for C5 nerve palsy (P = 0.024; P = 0.04). The ROC curve analysis for the T1 slope showed that the cutoff value was 21.3° and the AUC was 0.796. The ROC curve analysis for the encroachment ratio revealed that the cutoff value was 0.21 and the AUC was 0.763. Both analyses demonstrated good diagnostic value for C5 nerve palsy.

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative T1 slope and encroachment ratio were variables that were risk factors for C5 nerve palsy in patients who underwent cervical posterior open-door laminoplasty.

Do the newly proposed realignment targets for C2 and T1 slope bridge the gap between radiographic and clinical success in corrective surgery for adult cervical deformity?

OBJECTIVE

Surgical correction of cervical deformity (CD) has been associated with superior alignment and functional outcomes. It has not yet been determined whether baseline or postoperative T1 slope (T1S) and C2 slope (C2S) correlate with health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) metrics and radiographic complications, such as distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) and distal junctional failure (DJF). The objective of this study was to determine the impact of T1S and C2S deformity severity on HRQoL metrics and DJF development in patients with CD who underwent a cervical fusion procedure.

METHODS

All operative CD patients with upper instrumented vertebra above C7 and preoperative (baseline) and up to 2-year postoperative radiographic and HRQoL data were included. CD was defined as meeting at least one of the following radiographic parameters: C2-7 lordosis < -15°, TS1-cervical lordosis mismatch > 35°, segmental cervical kyphosis > 15° across any 3 vertebrae between C2 and T1, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis > 4 cm, McGregor's slope > 20°, or chin-brow vertical angle > 25°. Spearman's rank-order correlation and linear regression analysis assessed the impact of T1S and C2S on HRQoL metrics (Neck Disability Index [NDI], modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association [mJOA] scale, EuroQOL 5-Dimension Questionnaire [EQ-5D] visual analog scale [VAS] score, and numeric rating scale [NRS]-neck) and complications (DJK, DJF, reoperation). Logistic regression and a conditional inference tree (CIT) were used to determine radiographic thresholds for achieving optimal clinical outcome, defined as meeting good clinical outcome criteria (≥ 2 of the following: NDI < 20 or meeting minimal clinically important difference, mild myelopathy [mJOA score ≥ 14], and NRS-neck ≤ 5 or improved by ≥ 2 points), not undergoing reoperation, or developing DJF or mechanical complication by 2 years.

RESULTS

One hundred five patients with CD met inclusion criteria. By surgical approach, 14.7% underwent an anterior-only approach, 46.1% a posterior-only approach, and 39.2% combined anterior and posterior approaches. The mean baseline radiographic parameters were T1S 28.3° ± 14.5° and C2S 25.9° ± 17.5°. Significant associations were found between 3-month C2S and mJOA score (r = -0.248, p = 0.034), NDI (r = 0.399, p = 0.001), EQ-5D VAS (r = -0.532, p < 0.001), NRS-neck (r = 0.239, p = 0.040), and NRS-back (r = 0.264, p = 0.021), while significant correlation was also found between 3-month T1S and mJOA score (r = -0.314, p = 0.026), NDI (r = 0.445, p = 0.001), EQ-5D VAS (r = -0.347, p = 0.018), and NRS-neck (r = 0.269, p = 0.049). A significant correlation was also found between development of DJF and 3-month C2S (odds ratio [OR] 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.1, p = 0.015) as well as for T1S (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.01-1.1, p = 0.023). Logistic regression with CIT identified thresholds for optimal outcome by 2 years: optimal 3-month T1S < 26° (OR 5.6) and C2S < 10° (OR 10.4), severe 3-month T1S < 45.5° (OR 0.2) and C2S < 38.0° (no patient above this threshold achieved optimal outcome; all p < 0.05). Patients below both optimal thresholds achieved rates of 0% for DJK and DJF, and 100% met optimal outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The severity of CD, defined by T1S and C2S at baseline and especially at 3 months, can be predictive of postoperative functional improvement and occurrence of worrisome complications in patients with CD, necessitating the use of thresholds in surgical planning to achieve optimal outcomes.

Mechanisms of compensatory for cervical lordosis changes after laminectomy with fusion

Background

The compensatory mechanisms for cervical lordosis change after laminectomy with fusion was not clear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the compensatory behaviors for cervical lordosis change after laminectomy with fusion.

Methods

This was a retrospective radiological analysis of 43 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent laminectomy with fusion (LCF). The following cervical parameters were measured: C2-7 Cobb angle (C2-7), occiput-C2 angle (O-C2), the cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), and T1 slope (T1S). The difference was calculated for all angle parameters between the two time points using the following formula: the amount of change (Δ) = (value at the follow-up)—(preoperative value). Non-parametric tests and the t-test were used to compare the difference. The Pearson correlation test was performed, and stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the best correlation between ∆cSVA and ∆T1S.

Results

The mean age of 43 patients was 65.51 ± 9.80 years. All patients were classified into two subgroups based on ΔcSVA: Group M (maintained) and, Group I (increased). The preoperative O-C2, C2-7, T1S, and cSVA were similar between Group M and group I (p = 0.950, p = 0.731, p = 0.372, and p = 0.152, respectively). Postoperative O-C2 and postoperative cSVA were significantly different (p = 0.036 and p = 0.004, respectively). ∆O-C2, ∆T1S and ∆cSVA were significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.006, p = 0.000, and p = 0.000, respectively). ΔcSVA had significant correlations with ΔO-C2 neutral angle (r = 0.377) and ΔT1S (r = 0.582). A linear regression equation was established: ΔcSVA = 0.602 + 0.103 * ΔT1S (R = 0.582, R² = 0.339).

Conclusions

The decrease of TIS should be the first and foremost compensation for the loss of lordosis in C2-7 segments after LCF. When the change of T1S alone can not prevent the deterioration of cervical sagittal balance, further increases in the O-C2 segment occur.

C5 Palsy of Patients with Proximal-Type Cervical Spondylotic Amyotrophy

Study Design

An observational cohort study design was adopted in this study.

Purpose

This study was designed to investigate preoperative factors that predict poor outcomes following surgery in patients with proximal-type cervical spondylotic amyotrophy (PCSA) using radiological findings.

Overview of Literature

We evaluated the preoperative factors associated with poor outcomes using electrophysiological and neurological findings. However, the preoperative factors associated with poor outcomes remained unclear.

Methods

Sixty patients with PCSA who underwent surgical treatment of the cervical spine were enrolled. The radiological findings on plain radiographs, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were evaluated. The cervical lordotic angles, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and T1 slope were assessed on a lateral radiograph in the neutral position. CT was used to assess the width of the intervertebral foramen and the anterior protrusion of the superior articular process on the axial view. MRI was used to determine the number of levels of compression (NLC) and the presence of a high-intensity area in the spinal cord in the T2- weighted midsagittal view. The preoperative and postoperative strengths of the most atrophic muscles were evaluated using manual muscle testing. Improvements in strength were classified as excellent (five grades recovered), good (more than one grade recovered), fair (no improvement), or poor (worsened).

Results

The prevalence of C5 palsy was 17% (10/60). Patients with poor outcomes had higher NLC and Δ C2-C7 SVA than patients with excellent, good, and fair outcomes (p =0.015; odds ratio [OR], 5.758; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.397-23.726 for a change of 10% and p =0.048; OR, 1.068; 95% CI, 0.992-1.141 for a change of 10%, respectively).

Conclusions

ΔC2-C7 SVA and NLC may be used as prognostic factors for achieving a poor outcome following surgery in patients with PCSA. More focus is needed on preventing the increase in ΔC2-C7 SVA.

Differences in Demographic and Radiographic Characteristics between Patients with Visible and Invisible T1 Slopes on Lateral Cervical Radiographic Images

Introduction: The T1 slope is important for cervical surgical planning, and it may be invisible on radiographic images. The prevalence of T1 invisible cases and the differences in demographic and radiographic characteristics between patients whose T1 slopes are visible or invisible remains unexplored. Methods: This pilot study aimed to evaluate the differences in these characteristics between outpatients whose T1 slopes were visible or invisible on radiographic images. Patients (n = 60) who underwent cervical radiography, whose T1 slope was confirmed clearly, were divided into the visible (V) group and invisible (I) group. The following radiographic parameters were measured: (1) C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), (2) C2-7 angle in neutral, flexion, and extension positions. Results: Based on the T1 slope visibility, 46.7% of patients were included in group I. The I group had significantly larger C2-7 SVA than the V group for males (p < 0.05). The C2-7 SVA tended to be larger in the I group, without significant difference for females (p = 0.362). Discussion: The mean C2-7 angle in neutral and flexion positions was not significantly different between the V and I groups for either sex. The mean C2-7 angle in the extension position was greater in the V group. The T1 slope was invisible in males with high C2-7 SVA.

What is the most accurate substitute for an invisible T1 slope in cervical radiographs? A comparative study of a novel method with previously reported substitutes

OBJECTIVE

The ability to utilize the T1 slope is often limited by poor visibility on cervical radiographs. The C7 slope has been proposed as a reliable substitute but may have similar limitations of visibility. Herein, the authors propose a novel method that takes advantage of the superior visibility on CT to accurately substitute for the radiographic T1 slope and compare the accuracy of this method with previously reported substitutes.

METHODS

Lateral neutral standing cervical radiographs and cervical CT scans were examined. When the T1 slope was clearly visible on radiographs, the C3-7 slopes and T1 slope were measured. In CT method 1, a direct method, the T1 slope was measured from the upper endplate of T1 to the bottom edge of the CT image, assuming the edge was parallel to the horizontal plane. In CT method 2, an overlaying method, the T1 slope was calculated by superimposing the C7 slope angle measured on a radiograph onto the CT scan and measuring the angle formed by the upper endplate of T1 and the superimposed horizontal line of the C7 slope. A Pearson correlation with linear regression modeling was performed for potential substitutes for the actual T1 slope.

RESULTS

Among 160 patients with available noninstrumented lateral neutral cervical radiographs, the T1 slope was visible in only 54 patients (33.8%). A total of 52 patients met the inclusion criteria for final analysis. The Pearson correlation coefficients between the T1 slope and the C3-7 slopes, CT method 1, and CT method 2 were 0.243 (p = 0.083), 0.292 (p = 0.035), 0.609 (p < 0.001), 0.806 (p < 0.001), 0.898 (p < 0.001), 0.426 (p = 0.002), and 0.942 (p < 0.001), respectively. Linear regression modeling showed R2 = 0.807 for the correlation between C7 slope and T1 slope and R2 = 0.888 for the correlation between T1 slope with the CT method 2 and actual T1 slope.

CONCLUSIONS

The C7 slope can be a reliable predictor of the T1 slope and is more accurate than more rostral cervical slopes. However, this study disclosed that the novel CT method 2, an overlaying method, was the most reliable estimate of true T1 slope with a greater positive correlation than C7 slope. When CT studies are available in patients with an invisible T1 slope on cervical radiographs, CT method 2 should be used as a substitute for the T1 slope.

Analyzing the Significance of T1 Slope minus Cervical Lordosis in Patients with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery

Objective

Accurate measurement of T1 slope (a component of T1s minus cervical lordosis [CL]) is often constrained by anatomical limitations. In this situation, efforts should be made to find the exact meaning of T1s-CL and whether there are any alternatives to it.

Methods

We enrolled 117 patients who received two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Occipital slope, C2 slope (C2s), C7 slope (C7s), T1, O-C2 angle (O-C2A), C2-7 angle (C2-7A), O-C7 angle (O-C7A), T1s-CL, C7-T1 angle (C7-T1A), and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis were measured. We determined 16° (T1s-CL) as the reference point for dividing subjects into the mismatch group and the balance group, and a comparative analysis was performed.

Results

The mean value of C7-T1A was constantly maintained within 2.6° peri-operatively. In addition, C2s and T1s-CL showed the same absolute change (Δ|0.8|°). The mean values of T1s-CL of the mismatch and balance groups were 23.0° and 7.6°, respectively. The five factors with the largest differences between the two groups were as follows : C2s (Δ13.3°), T1s-CL (Δ15.4°), O-C2A (Δ8.7°), C2-7A (Δ14.7°), and segmental angle (Δ7.9°) before surgery. Only four factors showed statistically significant change between the two groups after ACDF : T1s-CL (Δ4.0° vs. Δ0.2°), C2s (Δ3.2° vs. Δ0.7°), O-C2A (Δ2.6° vs. Δ1.3°), C2-7A (Δ6.3° vs. Δ1.3°). A very strong correlation between T1s-CL and C2s was also found (r=|0.88–0.96|).

Conclusion

C2s itself may be the essential key to represent T1s-CL. The amounts and directions of change of these two factors (T1s-CL and C2s) were also almost identical. The above phenomenon was re-confirmed once again through the correlation analysis.

Cervical Spine Alignment in the Sagittal Axis: A Review of the Best Validated Measures in Clinical Practice

STUDY DESIGN

Review of the best-validated measures of cervical spine alignment in the sagittal axis.

OBJECTIVE

Describe the C2-C7 Cobb Angle, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis, chin-brow to vertical angle, T1 slope minus C2-C7 lordosis, C2 slope, and different types of cervical kyphosis.

METHODS

Search PubMed for recent technical literature on radiograph-based measurements of the cervical spine.

RESULTS

Despite the continuing use of measures developed many years ago such as the C2-C7 Cobb angle, there are new radiographic parameters being published and utilized in recent years, including the C2 slope. Further research is needed to compare older and newer measures for cross-validation. Utilizing these measures to determine the degree of correction intraoperatively and postoperatively will enable surgeons to optimize patient-level outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Cervical spinal deformity can be a debilitating condition characterized by cervical spinal misalignment that affects the elderly more commonly than young populations. Many of these validated measures of cervical spinal alignment are useful in clinical settings due to their ease of implementation and correlations with various postoperative and health-related quality of life outcomes.

Increased Neck Tilt/T1 slope ratio may play an important role in patients with cervical kyphosis

Background

In previous studies, we demonstrated that the T1 slope (T1s) is associated with clinical outcomes, but the results were not specific for individuals. A recent study suggested that an increased pelvic tilt (PT)/sacral slope (SS) ratio may play an important role in the degeneration of lumbar scoliosis and pathogenesis of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Therefore, we aimed to explore the role of neck tilt (NT)/T1s in patients with cervical kyphosis.

Methods

In total, the data of 36 kyphosis patients who underwent anterior cervical hybrid decompression and fusion (ACHDF) for multilevel (3 levels) cervical spondylotic myelopathy were retrospectively analyzed. The radiographic measurements included the T1s, NT, C2–7 Cobb angle, and C2–7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA). The visual analog scale (VAS) and neck disability index (NDI) scores were used to determine the clinical prognosis. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the relationships among preoperative imaging examination parameters.

Results

The mean C2–7 Cobb angle was − 5.93 ± 3.00° before surgery, 9.67 ± 6.61° after surgery, and 7.91 ± 8.73° at the follow-up. The preoperative NT/T1s ratio was positively correlated with the ΔC2–7 Cobb angle (r = 0.358, p < 0.05) and negatively correlated with the preoperative C2–7 Cobb angle (r = -0.515, p < 0.01) and preoperative C2–7 SVA (r = -0.461, p < 0.01). The linear regression model indicated a positive correlation between the preoperative NT/T1s ratio and the ΔC2–7 Cobb angle (R² = 0.122).

Conclusions

The preoperative NT/T1s ratio may be positively correlated with changes in postoperative cervical spine curvature (Cobb angle). The NT/T1s ratio may be worthy of increased attention among sagittal parameters.

The impact of age, sex, disc height loss and T1 slope on the upper and lower cervical lordosis: a large-scale radiologic study

PURPOSE

To clarify the relative influence of age, sex, disc height loss and T1 slope on upper (Occiput-C2) and lower cervical lordosis (C2-C7).

METHODS

Standing lateral cervical radiographs of 865 adult subjects were evaluated. The presence and severity of disc height loss from C2/C3 to C6/C7 (a total of 4325 discs) were assessed using a validated grading system. The total disc height loss score for each subject was calculated as the sum of the score of each disc space. Sagittal radiographic parameters included: occipital slope, occiput-C2 (Oc-C2) lordosis, C2-C7 lordosis and T1 slope. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to examine the relative influence of the multiple factors on upper and lower cervical lordosis.

RESULTS

This study included 360 males and 505 females, with a mean age of 40.2 ± 16.0 years (range, 20-95 years). Linear multivariate regression analyses showed that greater age, male sex, greater T1 slope were each found to be significantly and independently associated with greater C2-C7 lordosis, whereas total disc height loss score was negatively associated with C2-C7 lordosis. T1 slope had the most independent influence on C2-C7 lordosis among these factors. Age, sex and disc height loss were not independently associated with Oc-C2 lordosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from our large-scale radiologic analysis may enhance the understanding of the factors that affect cervical lordosis, indicating that age, sex, disc height loss and T1 slope were each independently associated with C2-C7 lordosis. However, age, sex and disc height loss were not independently associated with upper cervical lordosis.

Spino Cranial Angle and Degenerative Cervical Spondylolisthesis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to analyze and compare the spino cranial angle (SCA) in patients with degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis (DCS) and asymptomatic controls and to determine whether SCA could help diagnose DCS.

METHODS

We enrolled 50 patients diagnosed with DCS (4.3%) from among 1168 patients and the same number of asymptomatic participants as the control group by using cervical radiographs. Both groups underwent cervical radiographs and computed tomography at the same time. Various sagittal parameters were measured on computed tomography in a standardized supine position and compared with the asymptomatic control group. The Spearman correlation coefficient was applied to test the correlation among the sagittal parameters in the DCS group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were performed to determine whether SCA could help predict DCS.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were enrolled in the DCS group, and 50 asymptomatic participants were included in the control group. The SCA was significantly lower for the DCS group than for the control group (76.84 ± 7.48 degrees vs. 82.47 ± 8.06 degrees, P < 0.001), and the T1 slope (T1s) was significantly greater for the DCS group than for the control group (27.29 ± 7.84 degrees vs. 22.28 ± 6.43 degrees, P = 0.001). Except for SCA and T1s, no other parameters showed significant differences. The SCA on the computed tomography scan was significantly correlated with the values of the T1s (r = -0.890, P < 0.001), cervical lordosis (r = -0.437, P = 0.002), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (r = 0.397, P = 0.004), and thoracic inlet angle (r = -0.565, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that both a lower SCA and a higher T1s could be risk factors for DCS, and an SCA of <79.1 degrees demonstrated significant diagnostic value for the detection of DCS.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in the DCS group had a lower SCA and a higher T1s. Both a lower SCA and a higher T1s could be risk factors for DCS, and an SCA of <79.1 degrees demonstrated significant diagnostic value for the detection of DCS.

The differential effect of cervical kyphosis correction surgery on global sagittal alignment and health-related quality of life according to head- and trunk-balanced subtype

OBJECTIVE

No reports have investigated how cervical reconstructive surgery affects global sagittal alignment (GSA), including the lower extremities, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The study was aimed at elucidating the effects of cervical reconstruction on GSA and HRQOL.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients who underwent reconstructive surgery for cervical kyphosis were divided into a head-balanced group (n = 13) and a trunk-balanced group (n = 10) according to the values of the C7 plumb line, T1 slope (T1S), and pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL). Head-balanced patients are those with a negative C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), a larger LL than PI, and a low T1S. Trunk-balanced patients are those with a positive SVAC7, a normal PI-LL, and a normal to high T1S. Various sagittal Cobb angles, SVA, and lower-extremity alignment parameters were measured before and after surgery using whole-body stereoradiography.

RESULTS

Cervical malalignment was corrected to achieve cervical sagittal balance and occiput-trunk (OT) concordance (center of gravity [COG]-C7 SVA < 30 mm). Significant changes in the upper cervical spine and thoracolumbar spine were observed in the head-balanced group, but no significant change in lumbopelvic alignment was observed in the trunk-balanced group. Lower-extremity alignment did not change substantially in either group. HRQOL scores improved significantly after surgery in both groups. SVACOG-C7 and SVAC2-7 were negatively and positively correlated with the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey physical component score and Neck Disability Index, respectively. The visual analog scale for back pain, Oswestry Disability Index, and PI-LL mismatch improved significantly in the head-balanced group after cervical reconstruction surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cervical kyphosis exhibited compensatory changes in the upper cervical spine and thoracolumbar spine, instead of in the lower extremities. These compensatory mechanisms resolved reciprocally in a different fashion in the head- and trunk-balanced groups. HRQOL scores improved significantly with GSA restoration and OT concordance following cervical reconstruction.

The Effect of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion on Cervical Sagittal Vertical Axis and Lordosis with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) can induce lordosis and improve cervical sagittal vertical axis (SVA), but multilevel ACDF may inadvertently increase cervical SVA because of insufficient lordosis induction.

METHODS

Patients who underwent 1-, 2-, or ≥3-level ACDF in the subaxial spine with minimum 2-year follow up were retrospectively studied. C2-C7 Cobb angle (lordosis), cervical SVA, and T1 slope were measured preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at last follow-up.

RESULTS

Inclusion criteria were met by 127 patients. There were no differences in baseline demographics among 1-, 2-, and ≥3-level ACDF groups. Mean follow-up was 43.7 months (range, 24-142 months). Increase of cervical SVA immediately postoperatively was 1.94 mm, -1.44 mm, and 7.25 mm for 1-, 2-, and ≥3-level ACDF (P = 0.041) and at last follow-up was 2.97 mm, 0.70 mm, and 9.32 mm for 1-, 2-, and ≥3-level ACDF (P = 0.026). At last follow-up, 2-level ACDF patients had the greatest decrease in T1 slope (-0.43°) compared with increase of 2.71° for 1-level and 2.84° for ≥3-level patients (P = 0.028). In all 3 groups, segmental (ACDF levels) lordosis, cervical SVA, and T1 slope did not decrease from immediate postoperative to last follow-up. Only 2-level ACDF maintained C2-7 lordosis (2.16°) compared with loss of lordosis in 1-level (-0.84°) and ≥3-level (-2.00°) ACDF (P = 0.008) at last follow-up. Linear regression analysis showed that T1 slope had no relationship with correction of cervical SVA (P = 0.5310) but had a significant correlation with Cobb angle loss of C2-C7 lordosis (P = 0.0016).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with 1- and 2-level ACDF, ≥3-level ACDF resulted in significant increase of cervical SVA and loss of overall lordosis. Compared with 1- and ≥3-level ACDF, 2-level ACDF had the greatest ability to maintain lordosis. T1 slope had a significant correlation with loss of C2-C7 lordosis after ACDF.

Sagittal balance of the cervical spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the cervical sagittal parameters between patients with cervical spine disorder and asymptomatic controls.

METHODS

Two independent authors systematically searched online databases including Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane library, and Web of Science up to June 2020. Cervical sagittal balance parameters, such as T1 slope, cervical SVA (cSVA), and spine cranial angle (SCA), were compared between the cervical spine in healthy, symptomatic, and pre-operative participants. Where possible, we pooled data using random-effects meta-analysis, by CMA software. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed using the I-squared statistic and funnel plots, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 102 studies, comprising 13,802 cases (52.7% female), were included in this meta-analysis. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to evaluate the quality of studies included in this review. Funnel plot and Begg's test did not indicate obvious publication bias. The pooled analysis reveals that the mean (SD) values were: T1 slope (degree), 24.5 (0.98), 25.7 (0.99), 25.4 (0.34); cSVA (mm), 18.7 (1.76), 22.7 (0.66), 22.4 (0.68) for healthy population, symptomatic, and pre-operative assessment, respectively. The mean value of the SCA (degree) was 79.5 (3.55) and 75.6 (10.3) for healthy and symptomatic groups, respectively. Statistical differences were observed between the groups (all P values < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The findings showed that the T1 slope and the cSVA were significantly lower among patients with cervical spine disorder compared to controls and higher for the SCA. Further well-conducted studies are needed to complement our findings.

Cervical Lordosis Ratio as a Novel Predictor for the Loss of Cervical Lordosis After Laminoplasty

Objective

Maintaining cervical lordosis (CL) after laminoplasty is important for indirect decompression of the spinal cord. This study aimed to identify preoperative dynamic radiographic predictors for the loss of CL after laminoplasty.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 141 consecutive patients who underwent cervical laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy. The following radiographic parameters were measured before surgery and at 1 year of follow-up: CL, C7 slope, C2–7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), C2–7 range of motion (ROM), CL in flexion, CL in extension, ROM of flexion (Flex ROM), and ROM of extension. The CL ratio (CLR) was defined as 100 × Flex ROM/C2–7 ROM. ΔCL was defined as postoperative CL minus preoperative CL. Patients were classified into 2 groups: group K (kyphotic change group, ΔCL ≤ -10) and group C (control group, ΔCL > -10).

Results

The patient population comprised 94 men and 47 women (mean age, 70.9 ± 9.4 years), with 24 patients (17.0%) classified into group K. CL, C7 slope, and CLR were significantly higher in group K than in group C. The groups did not significantly differ in age, sex, C2–7 SVA, and C2–7 ROM. On multivariable analysis, the CLR was significantly associated with postoperative kyphotic changes. On receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis (area under the curve = 0.717, p < 0.001), the cutoff value for CLR was 68.9%, with sensitivity and specificity of 87.5% and 57.3%, respectively.

Conclusion

The CLR, reflecting the balance between flexion and extension mobility, was identified as a novel predictor for CL loss after laminoplasty, with a cutoff value of 68.9%.

Cervical sagittal alignment after Prestige LP cervical disc replacement: radiological results and clinical impacts from a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Cervical disc replacement (CDR) has been widely used to treat one- and two-level cervical degenerative disc disease. Studies have shown the effectiveness of CDR in preserving range of motion (ROM) and delaying adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). Cervical sagittal alignment is an important factor affecting favorable clinical outcomes in cervical spine surgery. This study aimed to explore whether cervical sagittal alignment can be maintained after CDR and to identify the impact of cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes after CDR.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective study. 132 patients who underwent one-level CDR were included. Cervical sagittal alignments, including cervical lordosis (CL), segmental alignment (SA), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 slope (T1s), and T1s minus CL (T1s-CL), were measured. The effects of cervical sagittal alignment on the CDR outcomes were analyzed. Patients were divided into the heterotopic ossification (HO) group and ASD group to determine the potential impacts of cervical sagittal parameters.

RESULTS

The cervical sagittal alignment parameters, except for the SVA, were significantly improved after CDR and showed decreasing trends at the last follow-up. Significantly higher CL and T1s were found in patients with better ROM after CDR. SVA ≥ 20 mm increased the risk of anterior HO (odds ratio = 2.945, P = 0.007). Significantly kyphotic SA and lower T1s values were found in the ASD patients than in the non-ASD patients (P < 0.05). Patients with ASD at the inferior level showed significantly worse CL (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

CDR had limited function of improving cervical sagittal alignment. Poor cervical sagittal alignment after CDR was associated with HO, ASD, and less ROM.

The importance of preoperative T1 slope for determining proper postoperative C2-7 Cobb's angle in patients undergoing cervical reconstruction

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to explore the relationship among different cervical sagittal parameters in asymptomatic volunteers and the correlation between surgical efficacy and difference of presumed and actual postoperative C2-7 Cobbs's angle (C2-7COBB), which was calculated based on preoperative T1 slope (T1S) in patients undergoing cervical reconstruction.

METHODS

In total, 158 inpatients with cervical spondylosis and 274 asymptomatic volunteers were retrospectively reviewed. Cervical sagittal parameters, such as C2-7COBB, T1S, thoracic inlet angle (TIA), and neck tilt (NT), were compared. Then, the correlation among these parameters was analyzed in asymptomatic volunteers, and a regression equation between T1S and C2-7COBB was established and used to analyze the correlation among the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score improvement, the sagittal parameters, and the difference between presumed and actual postoperative C2-7COBB in patients after cervical reconstruction.

RESULTS

The mean T1S, C2-7COBB, and TIA were significantly decreased in patients (P < 0.01). T1S and NT had a strong correlation with TIA (P < 0.01). T1S demonstrated a moderate correlation with C2-7COBB in asymptomatic volunteers (r = 0.569, P < 0.01). A regression equation had been established as C2-7COBB = 0.742 × T1S - 0.866. The mean C2-7COBB and JOA score improved significantly (P < 0.05) postoperatively. Moreover, the JOA improvement rate showed a significant negative correlation with the difference in the presumed and actual postoperative C2-7COBB (r = - 0.696, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Our study successfully established a regression equation for calculating postsurgical C2-7COBB based on the correlation between T1S and C2-7COBB in asymptomatic volunteers. The regression equation could be used for guiding surgeons to accomplish an ideal postsurgical C2-7COBB for patients with cervical spondylosis.

Relationship between the atlantodental interval and T1 slope after atlantoaxial fusion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Atlantoaxial fusion has been widely used for the treatment of atlantoaxial instability (AAI). However, atlantoaxial fusion sacrifices the motion of atlantoaxial articulation, and postoperative loss of cervical lordosis and aggravation of cervical kyphosis are observed. We investigated various factors under the hypothesis that the atlantodental interval (ADI) and T1 slope may be associated with sagittal alignment after atlantoaxial fusion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 64 patients with RA who underwent atlantoaxial fusion due to AAI. Radiological factors, including the ADI, T1 slope, Oc-C2 angle, cervical sagittal vertical axis, and C2-C7 angle, were measured before and after surgery.

RESULTS

The various factors associated with atlantoaxial fusion before and after surgery were compared according to the upper and lower preoperative ADIs. There was a significant difference in the T1 slope 1 year after surgery (p = 0.044) among the patients with lower preoperative ADI values. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the preoperative ADI (> 7.92 mm) defined in the receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was an independent predictive factor for the increase in the T1 slope 1 year after atlantoaxial fusion (odds ratio, 4.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-15.73; p = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

We found an association between the preoperative ADI and difference in the T1 slope after atlantoaxial fusion in the patients with RA. A preoperative ADI (> 7.92 mm) was an independent predictor for the increase in the T1 slope after atlantoaxial fusion. Therefore, performing surgical treatment when the ADI is low would lead to better cervical sagittal alignment.

Impact of cervical sagittal parameters on axial neck pain in patients with cervical kyphosis

Background

Cervical sagittal alignment (CSA) is closely related with cervical disk degeneration and impacts the spinal function, especially in the setting of cervical kyphosis (CK). In this study, we evaluated the influence of cervical sagittal parameters on the development of axial neck pain (ANP) in patients with CK.

Methods

Data pertaining to 263 patients with CK who visited the outpatient department of our hospital between January 2012 and December 2018 were retrospective analyzed. The most common symptoms of ANP were neck pain, stiffness, or dullness. Visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate ANP. The following radiographic parameters were evaluated: CK types, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic inlet angle (TIA), T1 slope, neck tilt (NT), cranial tilt, and cervical tilt. Sagittal alignment of CK was classified into 2 types: global and regional type. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for ANP.

Results

Patients who complained of ANP were categorized as ANP group (VAS score ≥ 3; n = 92), while those without ANP were categorized as non-ANP group (VAS score < 3; n = 171). There was no significant between-group difference with respect to age (P = 0.196), gender (P = 0.516), TIA (P = 0.139), NT (P = 0.676), CK type (P = 0.533), cranial tilt (P = 0.332), cervical tilt (P = 0.585), or cervical disk degeneration (P = 0.695). The T1 slope and C2-7 SVA in the ANP group were significantly greater than that in the non-ANP group (P < 0.05). On multivariate logistic regression, C2-7 SVA [

odds ratio (OR) 2.318, 95% confidence interval 1.373–4.651, P = 0.003) and T1 slope (OR 2.563, 95% CI 1.186–4.669, P = 0.028) were identified as risk factors for ANP.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest a significant effect of cervical sagittal parameters on the occurrence of ANP in patients with CK. Greater T1 slope and larger C2-7 SVA may lead to the development of neck pain.

Radiographic predictive findings of neck pain in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between neck pain and radiological findings in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients.

METHODS

The study groups comprised 257 AS and 50 normal patients. Of the AS patients, 91 had axial neck pain (group 1) and 166 did not (group 2). Full-length radiographs of the spine in the anteroposterior and lateral planes were taken. Radiographic parameters such as the chin brow vertical angle (CBVA), McGregor slope (McGS), slope of the Line of Sight (SLS), C2 slope, C2-C7 lordosis (CL), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-C7 SVA), and T1 slope were measured. Statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The AS and normal patients were found to have significantly different CBVA, McGS, C2 slope, C2-C7 SVA, and T1 slope. However, no significant difference was observed for SLS and CL. Between groups 1 and 2, there were significant differences in the McGS, CL, and T1 slope. However, no significant difference between these two groups was observed for CBVA, SLS, C2 slope, and C2-C7 SVA. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify statistically significant predictors of neck pain in AS patients and it revealed that the T1 slope and McGS were two such predictors. The T1 slope showed superior discriminatory power to McGS and CL in the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that a high T1 slope and McGS are independent radiological predictors of neck pain in AS. Further well-designed studies would be necessary to substantiate our results.

The significance of cervical sagittal alignment for nonrecovery after whiplash injury

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Whiplash-associated disorder is a common cause of chronic neck pain. Several radiological cervical angular variables are suggested to have constitutional characteristics, that is, them being minimally influenced by body positioning. However, the association between these variables and pain conditions remains poorly understood. To our knowledge, no previous studies have investigated the association between constitutional angular variables and the outcome after whiplash trauma.

PURPOSE

Our objectives were (1) to study the inter-rater agreement of sagittal radiologic variables between 2 raters and (2) to investigate any association between these variables and self-perceived nonrecovery after whiplash injury.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Forty-six patients aged 16 to 70 years, attending an emergency department after a motor vehicle accident resulting in neck pain were recruited.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Self-perceived nonrecovery (yes/no) was the primary outcome measure. The secondary outcome measure was pain level on a numeric rating scale.

METHODS

The participants underwent computed tomography scans in a supine position. Sagittal alignment variables (T1 slope, neck tilt, thoracic inlet angle [TIA], and C2-C7 angle) on the computed tomography scans were measured by 2 independent raters. Inter-rater agreement was tested with a paired sample t test and Bland-Altman plots for each variable. The patients were followed up after 6 months.

RESULTS

No systematic differences for the assessed variables were found between the 2 raters. The overall nonrecovery rate was 28%. For the group with low neck tilt, the nonrecovery rate was 50% (95% CI: 36%-78%) and for the group with high neck tilt, 8% (95% CI: 3%-25%). The nonrecovery rate for the group low TIA was 50% (95% CI 29%-72%) and for those with high TIA 14% (95% CI 4%-26%). The associations remained significant after adjustments for possible confounders. The inter-rater analysis shows satisfactory agreement without proportional bias.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates the existence of an association between the constitutional sagittal alignment of the cervical spine and the outcome after whiplash injuries.

Factors predicting loss of cervical lordosis following cervical laminoplasty: A critical review

Background:

Laminoplasty is a method of posterior cervical decompression which indirectly decompresses the spinal column. Unfortunately, many patients undergoing laminoplasty develops postoperative loss of cervical lordosis (LCL) or kyphotic alignment of cervical spine even though they have sufficient preoperative lordosis which results in poor surgical outcome.

Objective:

We would like to highlight the relationship between various radiological parameters of cervical alignment and postoperative LCL in patients undergoing laminoplasty.

Methods:

We performed extensive literature search using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science for relevant articles that report factors affecting cervical alignment following laminoplasty.

Results:

On reviewing the literature, patients with high T1 slope have more lordotic alignment of cervical spine preoperatively. They also have more chances of LCL following laminoplasty. C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) has no role in predicting LCL following laminoplasty though patients with low T1 slope (≤20°) and high C2–C7 SVA (>22 mm) had correction of kyphotic deformity following laminoplasty. C2–C7 lordosis, Neck Tilt, cervical range of motion, and thoracic kyphosis has no predictive value for LCL. Lower value of T1 slope (T1S-CL) and CL/T1S has more incidence of developing LCL following laminoplasty. The role of C2–C3 disc angle has not yet been evaluated in patients undergoing laminoplasty. Dynamic extension reserve determines the contraction reserve of SPMLC and lower dynamic extension reserve is associated with higher chances of LCL following laminoplasty.

Conclusions:

Cervical lordotic alignment is important in maintaining cervical sagittal balance which ultimately is responsible for global spinal sagittal balance and horizontal gaze. Among various radiological parameters, T1 Slope has been reported to be the most important factor affecting cervical alignment following laminoplasty.

Analysis of a radiographic parameter K-line tilt following adjacent two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

T1s, C2-7 lordosis, and C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) are the three most important sagittal parameters in the cervical spine. This study was conducted to investigate the relationships between classical sagittal alignment parameters and a new parameter, K-line tilt, and to study the impact of K-line tilt.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 72 patients who underwent adjacent two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) were retrospectively analyzed. Radiographic measurements included T1 slope (T1s), C2-7 lordosis, segment angle (SA), C2-7 SVA, and K-line tilt. The Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores were used to evaluate the clinical prognosis. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between radiographic measures. Linear regression analysis was used to analyze the relationship between follow-up K-line tilt and NDI.

RESULTS

ΔNDI was positively correlated with ΔT1s (r = 0.620, p < 0.05), ΔC2-7 SVA (r = 0.645, p < 0.05), and ΔK-line tilt (r = 0.702, p < 0.01); ΔK-line tilt was positively correlated with ΔT1s (r = 0.650, p < 0.05), ΔSA (r = 0.269, p < 0.05), and ΔC2-7 SVA (r = 0.293, p < 0.05); ΔT1s was positively correlated with ΔC2-7 lordosis (r = 0.428, p < 0.05), ΔSA (r = 0.631, p < 0.01), and ΔC2-7 SVA (r = 0.235, p < 0.05); ΔC2-7 lordosis was positively correlated with ΔSA (r = 0.666, p < 0.05) and negatively correlated with ΔC2-7 SVA (r = - 0.467, p < 0.01). The preoperative and postoperative K-line tilt values were statistically significant (p < 0.01), increasing from (7.50 ± 6.48)° to (9.95 ± 5.09)°. Preoperative NDI was positively correlated with preoperative C2-7 SVA (r = 0.639, p = 0.011) and K-line tilt (r = 0.516, p = 0.026); follow-up NDI was positively correlated with follow-up T1s (r = 0.664, p = 0.038), C2-7 SVA (r = 0.756, p = 0.004), and K-line tilt (r = 0.832, p = 0.006). The linear regression model showed that when the follow-up K-lint tilt was > 23.75°, NDI scores were > 25 (R² = 0.737, p = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the K-line tilt was strongly correlated with the C2-C7 SVA, indicating that the K-line tilt can be used as another cervical parameter to evaluate cervical alignment in adjacent two-level ACDF. K-line tilt is an important parameter similar to the classical parameter C2-C7 SVA. In particular, a K-line tilt greater than 23.75 corresponded to a worse clinical prognosis, which was defined as an NDI score greater than 25.

Can C7 Slope Be Used as a Substitute for T1 Slope? A Radiographic Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective radiographic study.

OBJECTIVES

T1 slope is an important parameter of sagittal spinal balance. However, the T1 superior endplate can be difficult to visualize on radiographs due to overlying anatomical structures. C7 slope has been proposed as a potential substitute for T1 slope when the T1 superior endplate is not well visualized. The objective of this study was 2-fold: (1) to assess the correlation between C7 and T1 slopes on upright cervical spine radiographs and (2) to evaluate the interrater reliability of C7 slope.

METHODS

Cervical spine radiographs taken between December 2017 and June 2018 at a single institution were reviewed. Two observers measured upper C7 slope, lower C7 slope, and T1 slope. The correlations between upper and lower C7 slope and T1 slope were evaluated, and linear regression analyses were performed. Interrater reliability of C7 slope was also assessed.

RESULTS

In this cohort of 152 patients, there was a strong correlation between upper C7 slope and T1 slope (r = 0.91, P < .001), as well as between lower C7 slope and T1 slope (r = 0.90, P < .001). T1 slope could be estimated from the linear regression equation, T1 slope = 0.87 × C7 slope + 7, with an overall model fit of R ² = 0.8. There was strong interrater reliability for upper (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.95, P < .001) and lower C7 slope (ICC = 0.96, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both the upper and lower C7 slope are strongly correlated with T1 slope and can be used as a substitute to estimate T1 slope when the superior endplate of T1 is not well visualized.

Analysis of the reciprocal changes in upper cervical profile and the risk factors for increasing cervical sagittal vertical axis after laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to elucidate the reciprocal changes in the upper cervical profile and the risk factors for increasing cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) after laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) of the cervical spine.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included thirty-nine consecutive patients (30 men and 9 women) with cervical OPLL who underwent cervical laminoplasty. We recorded the operative time, blood loss, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score recovery rate. Radiological measurements were performed to analyze the following parameters: pre and 1- year postoperative chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA), McGregor's slope (McGS), occiput to C2 Cobb angle (O-C2 angle), C2-C7 Cobb angle (C2-C7 angle), T1-slope (T1S), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) and calculated the change (Δ). Patients were divided into two groups according to ΔcSVA: positive (ΔcSVA ≥ 0) and negative (ΔcSVA < 0).

RESULTS

Postoperative O-C2 angle (P = 0.028), ΔO-C2 angle (P = 0.019), ΔC2-C7 angle (P = 0.030) and T1S (P = 0.009) diff ;ered between the two groups. ΔcSVA showed a positive correlation with ΔO-C2 (R = 0.365, P = 0.022) and T1S (R = 0.472, P = 0.002). ΔO-C2 showed a positive correlation with T1S (R = 0.478, P = 0.002) and a negative correlation with ΔC2-C7 (R=-0.443, P = 0.005). ΔC2-C7 showed a negative correlation with T1S (R=-0.415, P = 0.009). Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis showed that ΔcSVA increased by 0.757 mm for each T1 slope and increased by 0.905 mm for each ΔMcGS.

CONCLUSION

Increasing the lordosis in the O-C2 segment compensates for the loss of lordosis in the C2-C7 segment after cervical laminoplasty. Higher T1S is a risk factor for increasing cSVA after laminoplasty for OPLL of the cervical spine.

Accuracy and Reliability of X-ray Measurements in the Cervical Spine

Study Design

This study is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial which compared artificial disc replacement and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Purpose

Useful radiographic parameters for assessing cervical alignment include the Cobb angles, T1 slope (T1S), occipitocervical inclination (OCI), K-line tilt (KLT), and cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA). This study aimed to determine measurement accuracy and reliability for these parameters.

Overview of Literature

Various authors have assessed repeatability by comparing different methods of measurement, but knowledge of measurement error and minimal detectable change is scarce.

Methods

We evaluated 758 lateral cervical radiographs. One medical student and one spine surgeon (i.e., measured ×2 within 4 weeks) independently measured the parameters obtaining 5,850 values. Standard error of measurement (SEm) and minimum detectable change (MDC) were calculated for each parameter. The accuracy and reliability of the Cobb angle measurements were calculated for the different types of angles: cervical lordosis, prosthesis angle, segmental angle with two bone surfaces (SABB), and segmental angle with one bone and one metal surface. Reliability was determined with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results

SEm was 1.8° and MDC was 5.0° for the Cobb angle, with an intraobserver/interobserver ICC of 0.958/0.886. All the different subtypes of Cobb angles had an ICC higher than 0.950, except SABB (intraobserver/interobserver ICC of 0.922/0.716). The most accurate and reliable measurement was for KLT.

Conclusions

This study provides normative data on SEm and MDC for Cobb angles, T1S, KLT, OCI, and cSVA in cervical lateral radiographs. Reliability was excellent for all parameters except SABB (e.g., good).

Applicability of cervical sagittal vertical axis, cervical lordosis, and T1 slope on pain and disability outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in patients without deformity

OBJECTIVE

Understanding what influences pain and disability following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients with degenerative cervical spine disease is critical. This study examines the timing of clinical improvement and identifies factors (including spinal alignment) associated with worse outcomes.

METHODS

Consecutive adult patients were enrolled in a prospective outcomes database from two academic centers participating in the Quality Outcomes Database from 2013 to 2016. Demographics, surgical details, radiographic data, arm and neck pain (visual analog scale [VAS] scores), and disability (Neck Disability Index [NDI] and EQ-5D scores) were reviewed. Multivariate analysis was used.

RESULTS

A total of 186 patients were included, and 48.4% were male. Their mean age was 55.4 years, and 45.7% had myelopathy. Preoperative cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), cervical lordosis (CL), and T1 slope values were 24.9 mm (range 0-55 mm), 10.4° (range -6.0° to 44°), and 28.3° (range 14.0°-51.0°), respectively. ACDF was performed at 1, 2, and 3 levels in 47.8%, 42.0%, and 10.2% of patients, respectively. Preoperative neck and arm VAS scores were 5.7 and 5.4, respectively. NDI and EQ-5D scores were 22.1 and 0.5, respectively. There was significant improvement in all outcomes at 3 months (p < 0.001) and 12 months (p < 0.001). At 3 months, neck VAS (3.0), arm VAS (2.2), NDI (12.7), and EQ-5D (0.7) scores were improved, and at 12 months, neck VAS (2.8), arm VAS (2.3), NDI (11.7), and EQ-5D (0.8) score improvements were sustained. Improvements occurred within the first 3-month period; there was no significant difference in outcomes between the 3-month and 12-month mark. There was no correlation among cSVA, CL, or T1 slope with any outcome endpoint. The most consistent independent preoperative factors associated with worse outcomes were high neck and arm VAS scores and a severe NDI result (p < 0.001). Similar findings were seen with worse NDI and EQ-5D scores (p < 0.001). A significant linear trend of worse NDI and EQ-5D scores at 3 and 12 months was associated with worse baseline scores. Of the 186 patients, 171 (91.9%) had 3-month follow-up data, and 162 (87.1%) had 12-month follow-up data.

CONCLUSIONS

ACDF is effective in improving pain and disability, and improvement occurs within 3 months of surgery. cSVA, CL, and T1 slope do not appear to influence outcomes following ACDF surgery in the population with degenerative cervical disease. Therefore, in patients with relatively normal cervical parameters, augmenting alignment or lordosis is likely unnecessary. Worse preoperative pain and disability were independently associated with worse outcomes.

Cervical kyphosis in asymptomatic populations: incidence, risk factors, and its relationship with health-related quality of life

Background

Cervical kyphosis has been pointed out in asymptomatic populations. The purposes of this study were (1) to investigate the incidence of cervical kyphosis in asymptomatic populations, (2) to identify risk factors related to cervical kyphosis, and (3) to assess the relationship between cervical kyphosis and health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

Methods

A cohort of 235 asymptomatic volunteers’ records was retrospectively analyzed. Radiographic parameters of the coronal and sagittal planes were measured in the full-length spine x-ray. All patients were classified into two groups based on the cervical lordosis angle: cervical lordosis (CL) and cervical kyphosis (CK). HRQOL was evaluated by EQ-5D and SF-36 (PCS and MCS) questionnaires.

Results

CK was observed in 90 of 235 (38.3%) participants. There was a significant difference with regard to age between volunteers with CK and CL (32.23 ± 8.12 vs. 42.12 ± 6.14, p < 0.05). Several parameters had a significant relationship with CK, including TK, T1 slope, TIA, SVA, and CT. Logistic regression analysis identified age, TK, T1 slope, and SVA as independent risk factors of CK. In addition, there was a negative correlation between CK and the parameters of HRQOL (EQ-5D, − 0.63; PCS, − 0.68; MCS, − 0.59).

Conclusions

The incidence of CK in normal populations is 38.3%. Some spinal parameters are related to CK. CK is associated with the HRQOL.

Cervical alignment following laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Background:

Laminoplasty can result in the loss of cervical lordosis (LOCL) or the development of kyphosis after surgery. Here, we evaluated the clinical and radiological parameters involved in predicting the postoperative LOCL following laminoplasty in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

Methods:

For 50 patients with CSM and 35 with OPLL undergoing laminoplasty, preoperative and 1-year postoperative X-rays were obtained to determine the incidence and risk factors contributing to postoperative LOCL. The patients were divided into two groups depending on whether the preoperative T1 slope was above or below the median preoperative T1S (26°); Group A – high T1 slope group (n = 40) and Group B – low T1 slope group (n = 45).

Results:

Following laminoplasty, Group A patients had significantly higher preoperative lordosis (C2-C7 Cobb’s angle) (P = 0.001) and significantly higher LOCL (P = 0.02) versus Group B patients with low T1 slopes. The preoperative T1 slope was also found to be significantly correlated with the preoperative C2-C7 Cobb’s angles (R = 0.619, P = 0.001), LOCL (R = 0.487, P = 0.001), and preoperative C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (R = 0.480, P = 0.001). Utilizing multivariate analysis and a generalized linear model, the preoperative T1 slope significantly impacted the Oswestry disability index (ODI) index (P = 0.002) and frequency of LOCL (P = 0.001) following laminoplasty.

Conclusion:

The preoperative T1 slope is a significant predictor of the LOCL and change in ODI following laminoplasty for CSM/OPLL utilizing a cutoff value of 29.5°.

Which factors predict the loss of cervical lordosis following cervical laminoplasty? A review of various indices and their clinical implications

Background:

Many patients undergoing laminoplasty develop postoperative loss of cervical lordosis or kyphotic alignment of cervical spine despite sufficient preoperative lordosis. This results in poor surgical outcomes.

Methods:

Here, we reviewed the relationship between multiple radiological parameters of cervical alignment that correlated with postoperative loss of cervical lordosis in patients undergoing laminoplasty.

Results:

Patient with a high T1 slope (T1S) has more lordotic alignment of the cervical spine preoperatively and is at increased risk for the loss of cervical lordosis postlaminoplasty. Those with lower values of difference between T1S and Cobb’s angle (T1S-CL) and CL-T1S ratio have higher risks of developing a loss of the cervical lordosis postoperatively. Alternatively, C2-C7 lordosis, neck tilt, cervical range of motion, and thoracic kyphosis had no role in predicting the postlaminoplasty kyphosis.

Conclusion:

Among various radiological parameters, the preoperative T1S is the most important factor in predicting the postoperative loss of the cervical lordosis/alignment following laminoplasty.

How does the cervical spine respond to hyperkyphosis correction in Scheuermann's disease?

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to quantify the response of the cervical spine to the surgical correction of Scheuermann's kyphosis (SK) and to postoperative proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK).

METHODS

Fifty-nine patients (mean age 14.6 ± 2.3 years) were enrolled in the study: 35 patients in a thoracic SK (T-SK) group and 24 in a thoracolumbar SK (TL-SK) group. The mean follow-up period was 47.2 ± 17.6 months. Radiographic data, PJK-related complications, and patient-reported outcomes were compared between groups.

RESULTS

The global kyphosis significantly decreased postoperatively, and similar correction rates were observed between the two groups (mean 47.1% ± 8.6% [T-SK] vs 45.8% ± 9.4% [TL-SK], p = 0.585). The cervical lordosis (CL) in the T-SK group notably decreased from 21.4° ± 13.3° to 13.1° ± 12.4° after surgery and was maintained at 14.9° ± 10.7° at the latest follow-up, whereas in the TL-SK group, CL considerably increased from 7.2° ± 10.7° to 11.7° ± 11.1° after surgery and to 13.8° ± 8.9° at the latest follow-up. PJK was identified in 16 patients (27.1%). Its incidence in the TL-SK group was notably higher than it was in the T-SK group (41.6% [n = 10] vs 17.1% [n = 6], p = 0.037). Compared with non-PJK patients, PJK patients had greater CL and lower pain scores on the Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperkyphosis correction eventually resulted in reciprocal changes in the cervical spine, with CL notably decreased in the T-SK group but significantly increased in the TL-SK group. Patients developing PJK have increased CL, which seems to have a negative effect on patients' health-related quality of life.

Radiographic analysis of the correlation between ossification of the nuchal ligament and sagittal alignment and segmental stability of the cervical spine in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy

BACKGROUND

Ossification of the nuchal ligament (ONL) caused by chronic injury to the nuchal ligament (NL) is very common in instability-related cervical disorders.

PURPOSE

To determine possible correlations between ONL, sagittal alignment, and segmental stability of the cervical spine.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy-three patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and ONL (ONL group) and 118 patients with CSM only (control group) were recruited. Radiographic data included the characteristics of ONL, sagittal alignment and segmental stability, and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). We performed comparisons in terms of radiographic parameters between the ONL and control groups. The correlations between ONL size, cervical sagittal alignment, and segmental stability were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the independent risk factors of the development of ONL.

RESULTS

C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 slope (T1S), T1S minus cervical lordosis (T1S-CL) on the lateral plain, angular displacement (AD), and horizontal displacement (HD) on the dynamic radiograph increased significantly in the ONL group compared with the control group. The size of ONL significantly correlated with C2-C7 SVA, T1S, AD, and HD. The incidence of ONL was higher in patients with OPLL and segmental instability. Cervical instability, sagittal malalignment, and OPLL were independent predictors of the development of ONL through multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Patients with ONL are more likely to have abnormal sagittal alignment and instability of the cervical spine. Thus, increased awareness and appreciation of this often-overlooked radiographic finding is warranted during diagnosis and treatment of instability-related cervical pathologies and injuries.

Cervical Spine Deformity-Part 3: Posterior Techniques, Clinical Outcome, and Complications

The goals of cervical deformity surgery include deformity correction, restoration of horizontal gaze, decompression of neural elements, spinal stabilization with a biomechanically sound construct, and meticulous arthrodesis technique to prevent pseudoarthrosis and minimizing surgical complications. Many different surgical options exist, but selecting the correct approach that ensures the optimal clinical outcome can be challenging and often controversial. In this last part of the cervical deformity review series, various posterior deformity correction techniques are discussed in detail, along with an overview of surgical outcome and postoperative complications.