Responsiveness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) instruments in patients with spinal disorders

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures in Spine Surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) represent a valuable means of assessing the impact of spine surgery on various aspects of patient function and quality of life. This review highlights the most common and contemporary PROMs used in degenerative cervical and lumbar spine conditions, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, and adult spinal deformity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Available PROMs differ in their comprehensiveness, flexibility, and ease of use, as well as their ability to provide prognostic information. Condition-specific PROMs such as the Scoliosis Research Society-22 and Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association offer the benefit of prompts tailored to capture the unique considerations for a particular disease state, while more generalized metrics such as the Short-Form 36 facilitate widespread PROM standardization permitting comparison between disease states and interventions. Newer PROMS such as the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System and the Patient Generated Index offer benefits due to their generalizable yet adaptable format, conferring them the potential to capture condition-specific factors while still permitting comparison between diseases. However, these instruments require further adaptations and validation prior to widespread implementation to fully realize these advantages. Many PROMs are available for use in the spine surgery population, each with unique benefits and drawbacks, necessitating careful evaluation when selecting PROMs for research use.

Evaluation of fluoroscopically guided transforaminal epidural steroid injections for cervical radiculopathy utilizing patient reported outcome measurement information system as an outcome measure

Background

Cervical radiculopathy is a common cause of pain. For patients who fail conservative management, a transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) is an accepted intervention and alternative to decompression surgery.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effect of TFESIs for patients with cervical radiculopathy.

Methods

Adult patients treated at a multidisciplinary, tertiary academic spine center with cervical radicular pain and MRI evidence of corroborative cervical spondylotic foraminal stenosis and who had failed at least 6 weeks of conservative management consisting of medication and physical rehabilitation were included in this study. Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains of Physical Function (PF) v1.2/v2.0 and Pain Interference (PI) v1.1 were collected at baseline and at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits. Statistical analysis comparing baseline score with follow-up post-procedural PROMIS scores was performed. The percentage of patients who reported improvement exceeding the minimal clinically important difference was calculated for survey responders and for the worst case scenario.

Results

87 patients met inclusion criteria. PROMIS PI at 3-, 6-, and 12-months follow-up statistically improved by 2.2 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.1-2.4, p = 0.02), 2.3 (95 % CI 2.1-2.5, p = 0.03), and 2.7 (95 % CI 2.5-3.0, p = 0.03) points, respectively. Follow-up PROMIS PF score did not significantly differ from baseline scores. The percentage of patients that exceeded MCID thresholds of clinical significance was 59 % (95 % CI 47%-70 %) at 3-months, 52 % (95 % CI 41%-63 %) at 6-months, and 60 % (95 % CI 50%-72 %) at 12-months. Worst case scenario analysis demonstrated that 51 % (95 % CI 39%-62 %) of patients exceeded the MCID thresholds at 3-months, 32 % (95 % CI 22%-43 %) at 6-months, and 23 % (95 % CI 13%-33 %) at 12-months.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that TFESI leads to a long-term improvement up to a year in pain for patients with cervical radiculopathy.

The PROMIS-10 Mental Health T-Score: An Independent Predictor of Recovery for Up to 1 Year After Elective Lumbar Spine Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective comparative cohort.

OBJECTIVE

Investigate how mental health, as measured by the PROMIS-10 Global Mental Health T-Score (MHT), influences a patient's recovery up to 1 year after elective lumbar fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Patients with mental health concerns in need of lumbar fusions have increased. Evidence suggests that mental disorders influence a patient's postoperative recovery; however, there is a paucity of information detailing the association between mental health and outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 351 patients who underwent 1- or 2-level elective lumbar fusion between April 2020 and June 2023 and completed all follow-up evaluations for up to 1 year postfusion were analyzed for this study. Patients were stratified by their MHT score (above average [AA] >50, average [A] 40-50, below average [BA] <40), regardless of mental illness diagnosis. Outcome measures including pain at hospital discharge and 3, 6, and 12 months after fusion, patient satisfaction, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score at 3, 6, and 12 months after fusion were compared among groups.

RESULTS

Nearly 20% of patients reported below-average mental health during their preoperative evaluation. After controlling for confounders, findings suggested that patients in the [BA] group reported 2 pain levels higher than the [AA] group at each time point and 1 point higher than the [A] group. Patients in the [BA] group performed worse on the ODI at all-time points compared with the other study groups. Patients in the [AA] group were 3 times more likely to be satisfied with their outcomes compared with the [BA] group.

CONCLUSION

The MHT was an independent predictor of pain, satisfaction, and ODI scores for up to 1 year post-fusion, while a mental disorder diagnosis was not. An MHT score below 40 may be a risk factor for patients undergoing elective lumbar fusion.

Multimodal prehabilitation combined with perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery care for older patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery in China: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (PRACTICE trial)

INTRODUCTION

Besides the comorbid risk factors shared by older and younger patients, older individuals may also experience malnutrition, as well as cognitive or functional impairments. The accumulation of frailty and various geriatric syndromes in older individuals results in decreased physiological reserves, which makes the recovery process after spine surgery particularly challenging. Theoretically, combining the presurgery optimisation provided by a multimodal prehabilitation programme with the reduction of surgical stress provided by an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme could improve postoperative recovery of older patients.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a prospective, multicentre, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled study. Patients who are 75 years of age or older and are scheduled for spinal fusion surgery will be enrolled on three academic medical centres. Regular preadmission education and perioperative ERAS care will be given to participants who were randomised to the control group. Participants randomised to the intervention group will receive multimodal prehabilitation combined with ERAS (PREERAS) management. We will include 164 patients with spinal fusion in three hospitals in China. All included patients will be followed for 90 days after surgery or until death. The primary outcome is the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI), which ranges from 0 to 100, where a score of 100 indicates death due to complications. Secondary outcomes include length of stay and non-home discharge, rates of postoperative complications and unplanned readmission, North American Spine Society satisfaction, and Oswestry Disability Index/Neck disability index. Ninety-day CCI will be compared between groups using linear regression. Other continuous or categorical outcomes will be compared using linear or logistic regression.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has received ethical approval from the Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University Ethics Committees (2024-088-001). The findings will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT06140797.

Psychometric properties of neck disability index - a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the data on the psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index (NDI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched in April 2023. The random effects meta-analysis was conducted when possible.

RESULTS

Of 492 identified records, 79 were included. 70 studies were considered to be of low risk of systematic bias. Alpha was >0.81. Pooled test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.91 (95% CI 0.90-0.93). The NDI correlations with pain rating scales varied from 0.38 to 0.89. 13 studies found the NDI to be unidimensional and 15 - two- or three-dimensional. The minimal detectable change varied from 3% to 27% and minimal clinically important difference from 5% to 33%. Pooled area under the curve was 0.74 (95% CI 0.68-0.80). Most studies have not detected floor or ceiling effect. Sex-related differential item functioning has been present in one study.

CONCLUSIONS

The NDI demonstrated good internal consistency and test-retest reliability without floor or ceiling effect. In most situations, the NDI could be considered a unidimensional scale. The NDI well correlated with the common scales of pain and disability. The minimal clinically important difference and minimal detectable change were around 15% (7.5/50 points).

High Pain Catastrophizing Scale Predicts Lower Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Foot and Ankle Patient

BACKGROUND

Postoperative outcomes may be affected by the patient's preoperative morbidity. It is hypothesized that patient's pain catastrophization prior to foot and ankle surgery may affect their patient-reported outcomes. Methods: This study prospectively assessed a consecutive cohort of 46 patients undergoing foot and ankle reconstruction to describe the relationship between Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and patient-reported outcomes measured by 12-item Short Form Health Survey and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS).

RESULTS

The 1-year postoperative FAOS pain, activities of daily living, and quality of life scores correlated significantly with all baseline PCS subcategories. We found that the mental domain of the SF-12 had a statistically significant correlation with the rumination and helplessness PCS subcategories.

CONCLUSION

This study showed a significant association between a high preoperative PCS and a worse 1-year FAOS. As such, catastrophization could be screened for and potentially treated preoperatively to improve patient-reported outcomes in elective foot and ankle surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level III Evidence.

Evaluation of Fluoroscopically Guided Transforaminal Selective Nerve Root Sleeve Injections for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Radiculopathy Utilizing Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System as an Outcome Measure

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the therapeutic effect of transforaminal selective nerve root sleeve injections (TFSNRIs) in a specific subset of patients with clinical symptoms and presentation consistent with spinal stenosis.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Tertiary academic spine center.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 176 patients with radicular leg pain with or without low back pain as well as ≥3 clinical features of spinal stenosis and corroborative radiographic features of spinal stenosis on lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging without confounding spinal pathology (N=176).

INTERVENTIONS

Fluoroscopically guided transforaminal selective nerve root sleeve injections.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) v1.2/v2.0, Pain Interference (PI) v1.1, and PROMIS (D) v1.0 were collected at baseline and post-procedure short term (<3-months) and long-term (6-12 month) follow-up. Statistical analysis comparing baseline and postprocedural PROMIS scores was performed. Differences were compared with previously established minimal clinically important differences in the spine population.

RESULTS

For patients with spinal stenosis treated with TFSNRI, no statistically significant improvement was observed short- and long-term follow-up in PROMIS PF (P=.97, .77) and PROMIS Depression (P=.86, .85) scores. At short-term follow-up, PROMIS PI scores did significantly improve (P=.01) but the average difference of pre- and post-procedure scores did not reach clinical significance. No significant difference in PROMIS PI was noted at long-term follow-up (.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Although a statistically significant difference was observed for improvement in pain, in this retrospective study, TFSNRI did not provide clinically significant improvement in patients' function, pain, or depression for lumbar spinal stenosis at short- and long-term follow-up.

A 3-Year Study Investigating the Utility of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 for Long-Term Follow-Up in Adult Spinal Deformity

BACKGROUND

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) significantly impacts the quality of life due to three-dimensional spinal abnormalities. Patient-reported outcome measures, such as the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29), play a crucial role in assessing postoperative outcomes. This study aims to investigate trends in PROMIS-29 scores over 36 months in patients undergoing long-segment thoracolumbar fusion for ASD and provide insights into its long-term utility.

METHODS

A retrospective study including 163 ASD patients undergoing long-segment thoracolumbar fusion was conducted. PROMIS-29 scores were collected at baseline and at postoperative (0-), 3-, 6-, 12-, 18-, 24-, 30-, and 36-month follow-ups. Statistical analyses was performed to assess significant score changes from baseline and in consecutive recordings.

RESULTS

Significant improvements in all PROMIS-29 categories were observed at 36 months, with the greatest changes in pain intensity (-35.19%, P < 0.001), physical function (+29.13%, P < 0.001), and pain interference (-28.8%, P < 0.001). Between the 0 and 3 month mark, the greatest significant changes were recorded in pain intensity (-26.5%, P < 0.001), physical function (+24.3%, P < 0.001), and anxiety (-16.9%, P < 0.018). However, scores plateaued after the 3-month mark, with zero categories showing significant changes with subsequent consecutive recordings.

CONCLUSIONS

PROMIS-29 scores demonstrated notable improvements in ASD patients particularly in pain intensity, pain interference, and physical function. However, scores plateaued beyond the 3-month mark, suggesting PROMIS-29's limited sensitivity to nuanced changes in long-term patient recovery. Future investigations exploring optimal combinations of patient reported outcome measures for comprehensive short- and long-term outcome assessments in ASD surgery would be beneficial.

Utility of preoperative comorbidity burden on PROMIS outcomes after lumbar decompression: Cohort matched analysis

The influence of Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) burden on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) outcomes following lumbar decompression (LD) is limited. The objective of this study is to evaluate CCI burden impact on PROMIS outcomes. Retrospective review of elective LD excluding revision or surgeries for infectious, malignant, or traumatic reasons. Demographics and PROMIS scores collected preoperatively and postoperatively up to 2 years included: PROMIS-Physical Function (PF)/Sleep Disturbance (SD)/Pain Interference (PI)/Anxiety (A), VR-12 Physical/Mental Health Composite scores (VR-12 PCS/MCS)/Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Patients were divided into two groups based on their preoperative CCI score <3 (mild) or ≥4 (moderate to severe). Descriptive statistical analysis and MCID achievement rate calculations were conducted. A total of 182 patients were included: 93 CCI < 3 and 88 CCI ≥ 4. No significant differences were reported across preoperative PROMIS/legacy PROMs or final follow-up (p > 0.05, all). At 6-weeks, VR-12 PCS and ΔPROM scores indicated improved physician function in the CCI < 3 group (p = 0.020 and p = 0.040, respectively). Significant PROMIS-A ΔPROM score at final post-op was noted for CCI < 3 group (p = 0.026). MCID achievement demonstrated no significant differences for PROMIS outcomes and legacy PROMs. Results demonstrated that PROMIS outcomes were not impacted by a greater baseline comorbidity burden. At 6-weeks, the physical function scores were improved for the lower CCI group, and at final reported less anxiety. Our data suggests that comorbidity burden has a limited effect on PROMIS and legacy outcomes in patients undergoing LD.

Regional vs global physical therapy interventions to treat chronic pain in survivors of trauma: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

A history of traumatic life events is associated with chronic pain in later life. Physical therapists utilize a variety of methods to treat pain, however, they have struggled to find effective interventions to improve patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To compare impairment-based, regional (REGION-PT) physical therapy (PT) to a global (GLOBAL-PT) model consisting of pain neuroscience education, graded motor imagery, and exercise for adults with chronic pain and history of trauma.

DESIGN

Randomized Controlled Trial.

METHODS

Adults ≥ 18 years of age with chronic pain and a history of ≥1 trauma identified through the Life Events Checklist received the allocated intervention once a week for six weeks. Treatment effects were assessed using linear mixed models.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight participants completed the trial. There were no difference in outcomes between groups. There were significant interactions between race and intervention. Both interventions were associated with improvements in pain interference for white participants, but non-white participants experienced improvement only with GLOBAL-PT. Regardless of allocation, participants improved in physical function, six of the PROMIS-29 domains, and in pain interference measures.

CONCLUSION

Both interventions are reasonable strategies for individuals with chronic pain and a history of trauma.

Responsiveness and Minimal Important Change of the PROMIS Pain Interference Item Bank in Patients Presented in Musculoskeletal Practice

We evaluated the responsiveness of the Patient Reported Outcome Information System Pain Interference item bank in patients with musculoskeletal pain by testing predefined hypotheses about the relationship between the change scores on the item bank, change scores on legacy instruments and Global Ratings of Change (GRoC), and we estimated Minimal Important Change (MIC). Patients answered the full Dutch-Flemish V1.1 item bank. From the responses we derived scores for the standard 8-item short form (SF8a) and a CAT-score was simulated. Correlations between the change scores on the item bank, GRoC and legacy instruments were calculated, together with Effect Sizes, Standardized Response Means, and Area Under the Curve. GRoC were used as an anchor for estimating the MIC with (adjusted) predictive modeling. Of 1,677 patients answering baseline questionnaires 960 completed follow-up questionnaires at 3 months. The item bank correlated moderately high with the GRoC (Spearman's rho 0.63) and with the legacy instruments (Pearson's R ranging from .45 to .68). It showed a high ES (.97) and Standardized Response Means (.71), and could distinguish well between improved and not improved patients based on the GRoC (Area Under the Curve .77). Comparable results were found for the derived SF8a and CAT-scores. The MIC was estimated to be 3.2 (CI 2.6-3.7) T-score points. PERSPECTIVE: Our study supports the responsiveness of the PROMIS-PI item bank in patients with musculoskeletal complaints. Almost all predefined hypotheses were met (94%). The PROMIS-PI item bank correlated well with several legacy instruments which supports generic use of the item bank. MIC for PROMIS-PI was estimated to be 3.2 T-score points.

Efficiency and Accuracy of Computerized Adaptive Testing for the Oswestry Disability Index and Neck Disability Index

This study aimed to determine the efficiency and accuracy of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) models of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Neck Disability Index (NDI).

Methods

The study involved simulation using retrospectively collected real-world data. Previously developed CAT models of the ODI and NDI were applied to the responses from 52,551 and 18,196 patients with spinal conditions, respectively. Efficiency was evaluated by the reduction in the number of questions administered. Accuracy was evaluated by comparing means and standard deviations, calculating Pearson r and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values, plotting the frequency distributions of CAT and full questionnaire scores, plotting the frequency distributions of differences between paired scores, and Bland-Altman plotting. Score changes, calculated as the postoperative ODI or NDI scores minus the preoperative scores, were compared between the CAT and full versions in patients for whom both preoperative and postoperative ODI or NDI questionnaires were available.

Results

CAT models of the ODI and NDI required an average of 4.47 and 4.03 fewer questions per patient, respectively. The mean CAT ODI score was 0.7 point lower than the full ODI score (35.4 ± 19.0 versus 36.1 ± 19.3), and the mean CAT NDI score was 1.0 point lower than the full NDI score (34.7 ± 19.3 versus 33.8 ± 18.5). The Pearson r was 0.97 for both the ODI and NDI, and the ICC was 0.97 for both. The frequency distributions of the CAT and full scores showed marked overlap for the ODI and NDI. Differences between paired scores were less than the minimum clinically important difference in 98.9% of cases for the ODI and 98.5% for the NDI. Bland-Altman plots showed no proportional bias. The ODI and NDI score changes could be calculated in a subgroup of 6,044 and 4,775 patients, respectively; the distributions of the ODI and NDI score changes were near identical between the CAT and full versions.

Conclusions

CAT models were able to reduce the question burden of the ODI and NDI. Scores obtained from the CAT models were faithful to those from the full questionnaires, both on the population level and on the individual patient level.

Level of Evidence

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

What PROMIS Scores Correlate With Severe Disability in Cervical Spine Surgery?

STUDY DESIGN

Institutional Review Board-approved prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To establish a conversion between Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference (PI).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

As the National Institutes of Health (NIH) PROMIS is a global outcome measure, it can be difficult to interpret the clinical implications in patients with cervical spine surgery. To determine how a disease-specific legacy instrument (NDI) correlates with PROMIS PI and define levels of substantial and minimal disability, we developed a formula to convert NDI scores to PROMIS PI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult patients undergoing cervical spine surgery at a single institution from 2016 to 2018 were prospectively enrolled. Patients undergoing surgery for instability due to trauma were excluded. Preoperative questionnaires, demographic data, presenting complaint (radiculopathy, myelopathy, myeloradiculopathy), and procedural data were recorded. Patients were included if they had completed the NDI and PROMIS PI. Correlation and regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-six patients met inclusion criteria. The average age was 56.9±12.9 years. The mean NDI score was 68.6±38 and PROMIS PI was 60.9±7.3. The PROMIS PI was strongly correlated with the NDI ( r =0.76, P <0.001). Linear regression analysis revealed the following formula.

CONCLUSIONS

We performed a regression analysis allowing for the conversion of PROMIS PI scores with NDI. In keeping with the previous studies, our analysis showed that PROMIS PI was most strongly correlated to NDI. A PROMIS PI score >66 was correlated to substantial disability (NDI=50), whereas a PROMIS PI score <59 was correlated to minimal relative impairment (NDI=28). These results provide important reference, as PROMIS reporting becomes more widespread in the literature.

Total neurological recovery after surgical decompression and treatment with denosumab of large unresectable spinal giant cell tumour expanding to mediastinum

There is a controversy over the medical treatment of unresectable spinal giant cell tumour (GCT) regarding dosing and duration. We studied a spinal GCT case that had expanded to the thoracic spinal canal and mediastinum and was successfully treated by surgical decompression and denosumab. A woman in her 30s presented with weakness in both the lower extremities. MRI revealed a large tumour in the posterior mediastinum expanding from the thoracic vertebrae (T3–6), which compressed the spinal cord. The patient underwent urgent spinal decompression with instrumentation and her tissue was sent for a pathology study. Histologically and immunohistochemistry confirmed the diagnosis of GCT. Since it was an unresectable tumour, this patient was treated with denosumab. Her neurological problem resolved after 6 months of treatment. After 4 years of follow-up, the patient displayed no further progression and no side effects from long-term denosumab usage.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function instruments compare favorably to legacy patient-reported outcome measures in spine patients: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Preliminary evidence has suggested favorable correlation between National Institutes of Health (NIH) Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) assessments and traditional ("legacy") patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in spine surgery. There has been a significant increase in PROMIS research with regards to spinal conditions.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review is to provide an assessment of PROMIS Physical Function (PF) measures in this patient population.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Systematic review.

METHODS

A systematic search of the PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify published articles that referenced the various PROMIS PF measures. Two authors independently reviewed selected studies. The search returned 1,060 studies, 124 of which were selected for independent review by two authors. Of these, 37 were selected for inclusion. Mixed linear models were performed to assess for differences between legacy PROMs and PROMIS measures.

RESULTS

The combined sample size of all included studies yielded 10,296 total patients. Overall, PROMIS Physical Function (PF) measures demonstrated strong correlations with legacy PROMs when evaluating spine patients (weighted Pearson correlation, 0.589, standard error [SE]=0.023; weighted Spearman correlation, 0.702, SE=0.028). PROMIS questionnaires had significantly fewer questions than did legacy PROMs (4.2±0.30 vs. 9.53±0.82, p=.015). In spine studies, the PROMIS PF forms were completed in significantly less time than legacy PROMs (48.1±2.9 vs. 174.7±12.6 seconds, p<.001). The differences for the reliability measures and the floor and ceiling effects were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System PF forms compare favorably with legacy PROMs with regard to correlations, ease of use, and quality criteria in the field of spine surgery. PROMIS PF scores correlate strongly with commonly used legacy PROMs, particularly in spine patients. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System PF forms can be administered efficiently and to a broad patient population while remaining highly reliable.

Are Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System scales responsive in patients attending physical therapy with foot and ankle diagnoses?

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been used to provide insight into the patient experience while uncovering an opportunity to improve patient care. Current studies document responsiveness of outcomes using the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) for a variety of orthopedic problems but are not specific to a physical therapy interval of care.

PURPOSE

The main purpose of this study was to examine responsiveness of the PROMIS Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) scales across an interval of care for physical therapy in patients with foot and ankle conditions.

METHODS

Adult records (299 records, averaged 45.1 ± 15.4 years; 61% female) were assessed. Comparisons between pre- and post-physical therapy intervals of care were evaluated using a repeated-measures ANOVA, and the effect size was reported using Cohen's d.

RESULTS

PROMIS PF scores significantly improved from 38.5 ± 8.8 to 45.2 ± 9.1 (6.6; p < .001; Cohen's d = 1.0). PROMIS PI scores significantly improved from 56.8 ± 8.8 to 53.0 ± 9.8 (-3.8; p < .001; Cohen's d = 0.52).

CONCLUSIONS

The person-centered PROMIS PF and PI outcome measures were responsive to change following an interval of care in physical therapy for a large sample of orthopedic patients with foot and ankle diagnoses. The magnitude of change was dependent on starting score and diagnosis.

Early Improvement in Patient-Reported Outcome Scores After Operative Treatment of Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Humeral Capitellum

PURPOSE

Outcome measures that lack sensitivity for the detection of clinical changes early after surgery for capitellar osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) make it difficult to determine the optimal treatment for these defects. We sought to evaluate the early responsiveness of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) scores in a cohort of patients operatively treated for capitellar OCD.

METHODS

Four PROMIS questionnaires (mobility, upper extremity [UE], pain interference, and peer relations) were electronically administered to patients treated for capitellar OCD at a single tertiary academic medical center between January 1, 2015, and July 1, 2018. The questionnaires were administered at the initial preoperative outpatient clinic visit as well as at the 2-week, 6-week, and final return-to-play (RTP) visits.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients (31 elbows, mean age 12.9 years) with available preoperative and postoperative PROMIS data were included. The mean final follow-up period was 26 weeks. Compared with that before surgery, there was a significant improvement in the mobility, pain interference, and UE scores at 6 weeks following surgery. The scores improved most significantly by 6 weeks, reached a relative plateau, and remained significantly improved through the RTP visit thereafter. Patients with preoperative, intra-articular loose bodies scored significantly better than those without them during the 6-week and RTP visits. Patients with lesions >1 cm², compared with those with lesions ≤1 cm², demonstrated greater improvement in the UE scores during the RTP visit.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing operative treatment for capitellar OCD, a significant improvement in the PROMIS domains of mobility, pain interference, and UE can be expected early in the postoperative period, with majority of patients reaching their greatest improvement in scores by 6 weeks following surgery.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This is important information for preoperative counseling. In addition, this information is helpful in confirming that PROMIS scores are responsive in the detection of changes in outcomes during the early postoperative period in this population.

Persistent sleep disturbance after spine surgery is associated with failure to achieve meaningful improvements in pain and health-related quality of life

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Little is known about the effects of sleep disturbance (SD) on clinical outcomes after spine surgery.

PURPOSE

To determine the (1) prevalence of SD among patients presenting for spine surgery at an academic medical center; (2) correlations between SD and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores; and (3) associations between postoperative SD resolution and short-term HRQoL.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

PATIENT SAMPLE

We included 508 adults undergoing spine surgery at 1 academic center between December 2014 and January 2018.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Participants completed the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) or Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Patient Reported Outcome Measurement System (PROMIS-29) questionnaire preoperatively, during the immediate postoperative period (6-12 weeks), and at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery.

METHODS

Using preoperative PROMIS SD scores, we grouped participants as having no sleep disturbance (score <55), mild disturbance (score, 55-60), moderate disturbance (score 60-70), or severe disturbance (score, 70). For the final analysis, we collapsed these categories into no/mild and moderate/severe. Pearson correlation tests were used to assess correlations between SD and HRQoL measures. Regression analysis (adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, current opioid use, and occurrence of complications) was used to estimate the effect of postoperative resolved or continuing SD on HRQoL scores and the likelihood of achieving clinically meaningful improvements in HRQoL. Alpha = 0.05.

RESULTS

Preoperative SD was reported by 127 participants (25%). SD was significantly correlated with worse ODI and/or NDI values and worse scores in all PROMIS health domains (all, p<.001). At the immediate postoperative assessment, SD had resolved in 80 of 127 participants (63%). Compared with participants who reported no preoperative SD, those with ongoing SD were significantly less likely to achieve clinically meaningful improvements in Pain Interference (odds ratio [OR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28, 0.84), Physical Function (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.13, 0.82), and Satisfaction with Participation in Social Roles (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.37, 0.80).

CONCLUSION

One-quarter of spine surgery patients reported preoperative SD of at least moderate severity. Poor preoperative sleep quality and ongoing postoperative sleep disturbance were significantly associated with worse scores on several HRQoL measures. These results highlight the importance of addressing patients' sleep disturbance both before and after surgery.

Linking Oswestry Disability Index to the PROMIS pain interference CAT with equipercentile methods

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

When different health care providers use different patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments, it is challenging to integrate findings that describe particular patient groups or to establish treatment effectiveness across studies. It is therefore critical to develop accurate ways to convert scores between various instruments for clinicians and researchers to make comparisons across health outcomes.

PURPOSE

To develop a common metric so that scores on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and scores on the PROMIS Physical Function can be converted interchangeably.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Data were collected from a prospective study. A single-group linking design was used.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The study population included 9020 patients presented to an orthopedic spine clinic from November 2013 to March 2019.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients completed the ODI and the PROMIS Pain Interference scale delivered by Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) at the same time prior to their visit with a spine clinician.

METHODS

Equipercentile linking methods based on log-linear smoothing approach and non-smoothing approach were used to establish a common metric across the two measures.

RESULTS

The two measures assess the similar contruct of pain. The correlation between the scores of the ODI and the PROMIS PI was 0.81. The standardized Root Expected Mean Square Difference (REMSD) values for gender, ethnic, and racial groups ranged from 3.55% to 4.81%. Hence, the assumptions for the equipercentile linking method were met. The crosswalk derived linked scores based on the log-linear smoothing method yielded small deviations (Δ = 0.09) from the observed scores. We then identified linked PROMIS-PI scores corresponding to the benchmark ODI scores for the five disability levels and for various categories of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to create crosswalks to interchangeably convert scores between the ODI to the PROMIS-PI in a large population of spine patients using the equipercentile linking method. The results of this study provide confidence in the validity and usefulness of the derived crosswalks based on the equipercentile linking approach. The crosswalks are helpful for comparing new and old studies on the two measures and identifying benchmark scores for various diseases and disability levels.

The Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in Spine: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was developed to provide an easily administered patient-outcome questionnaire that was adaptable to a variety of medical and surgical subspecialties. Numerous authors have examined the effectiveness of PROMIS in various areas of spine surgery. Our goal was to systematically review PROMIS scores compared with legacy patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) in spinal surgery and spine pathology.

METHODS

A systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines was performed, yielding 254 unique studies reporting on "PROMIS" in "spine." Each study was independently reviewed. A total of 16 studies were selected for inclusion.

RESULTS

The pooled sample size yielded a total of 4268 patients. In the cervical population, PROMIS physical function (PF; |r| = .47-.87, pain intensity (PIn; |r| = .61-.74), pain interference (PIf; |r| = .65-.88), and pain behavior (PB; |r| = .59-.74) correlated with the Neck Disability Index (NDI). PROMIS PF also strongly correlated with the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale (mJOA; |r| = .61-.72). Among patients with lumbar pathology and adult spinal deformities, PROMIS PF (|r| = .53-.85), PIn (|r| = .73-.78), PIf (|r| = .59-.89), and PB (|r| = .58-.82) strongly correlated with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). PF (|r| = .51-.78), PIf (|r| = .60-.70), and anxiety (|r| = .73) also strongly correlated with the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 and SRS-30. When comparing measures of global health, PROMIS PF was strongly correlated with the Short Form (SF)-12 and SF-36 (|r| = .50-.85). On average, all PROMIS domains required less time to complete (49.6-56 seconds) than the ODI (176 seconds), NDI (190.3 seconds), SF-12 (214 seconds), and SF-36 physical function domains (99 seconds). The responsiveness of the PROMIS PF, PIf, and PB was comparable to that of legacy measures ODI, NDI, and SF-12.

CONCLUSIONS

The PROMIS PF, PIn, PIf, and PB demonstrated moderate to strong correlations with NDI, mJOA, ODI, SRS, and SF-12 measures in various populations of spine patients. All PROMIS domains had decreased time to completion and similar responsiveness compared with legacy measures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These results highlight the potential of PROMIS as a valid and reliable tool to assess patient-reported outcomes in spinal surgery patients and support more widespread use of PROMIS in spine.

Full Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminoplasty with Periendoscopic Visualized Trephine Technique for Lumbar Disc Herniation with Migration and/or Foraminal or Lateral Recess Stenosis

PURPOSE

To introduce a newly designed periendoscopic visualized trephine system for foraminoplasty in treating lumbar disc herniation with migration and/or foraminal or lateral recess stenosis, and report early clinical outcomes evaluated by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).

METHODS

A total of 25 patients who underwent transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy with foraminoplasty using a periendoscopic visualized trephine from June 2019 to January 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. PROMIS pain interference and physical function were selected as outcome measures.

RESULTS

The average age of the 25 patients (16 males, 9 females) was 32.0 ± 7.5 years (20-48 years). All patients were successfully followed up with the mean time of 10.1 ± 2.8 months (6-12 months). PROMIS pain interference scores decreased significantly from mean 67.0 ± 3.4 preoperatively to 37.5 ± 5.4 at the final follow-up (P < 0.01), and PROMIS physical function scores improved significantly from mean 29.2 ± 5.5 preoperatively to 59.3 ± 3.7 at the final follow-up (P < 0.01). No neural or vascular complication occurred.

CONCLUSION

Full endoscopic lumbar foraminoplasty with a periendoscopic visualized trephine technique is safe and effective for treating lumbar disc herniation with migration and/or lateral recess or foraminal stenosis, with improved flexibility and convenience and decreased radiation exposure.

Responsiveness of the PROMIS-29 Scales in Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate responsiveness and estimate the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) scales in individuals with chronic low back pain.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The PROMIS-29 questionnaire assesses seven health-related quality-of-life domains. However, research to evaluate the responsiveness and MCIDs of the PROMS-29 scores in individuals with low back pain is limited.

METHODS

The study was conducted in physical therapy clinics in Thailand, using validated Thai versions of the study measures. One hundred and eighty-three individuals with chronic low back pain completed the PROMIS-29 at baseline and at 4-weeks follow-up. Perceived change in each domain assessed by the PROMIS-29 scales was assessed at 4 weeks using a 7-point measure of Global Perceived Effect (GPE). Responsiveness of the PROMIS-29 scale scores was evaluated by examining the effect sizes, the standardized response means (SRMs) for change over time, and examining these as a function of the GPE ratings. MCIDs for the scales were estimated by computing a half a standard deviation (SD) and standard error of measurement statistic for each scale.

RESULTS

The mean change scores, effect sizes, and SRMs increased as a function of the GPE ratings. Significant differences in change scores between those who reported that they were very much improved and those who did not improve were found for the PROMIS-29 Pain Intensity, Physical Function, and Anxiety scales. The correlations between changes scores and GPE ratings were mostly weak in magnitude. The MCID estimates computed as 0.50 of a SD unit and as a standard error of measurement showed similar values.

CONCLUSION

The PROMIS-29 scale scores assessing pain intensity, physical function, and anxiety evidenced the most responsivity in the study sample. The results, when considered in light of the findings from other investigators, support 5.0 points as a reasonable MCID for most of the PROMIS-29 scales. Further studies are needed to determine the generalizability of the findings.Level of Evidence: 2.

Longitudinal Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System for Back and Leg Pain in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

OBJECTIVE

While visual analogue score (VAS) metrics are among the most universally adopted patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), there is limited research on the influence of back and leg pain on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) scores. Here we assess the association of VAS back and VAS leg scores with PROMIS PF in the setting of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). Secondarily, we determine if PROMIS PF is more influenced by back or leg pain.

METHODS

A prospective surgical registry was reviewed from May 2015 to November 2018. Inclusion criteria were primary, single-level MIS TLIFs. We excluded multilevel procedures and patients without preoperative PROMs. Pre- and postoperative PROMIS PF, VAS back, and VAS leg scores were recorded at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year. A Pearson correlation evaluated PROMIS PF association with VAS back and VAS leg scores. A Fisher z-test compared correlations. Linear regression evaluated PROMIS with VAS back and VAS leg scores.

RESULTS

Our cohort was comprised of 146 subjects. 40.4% were female and the average age of 51 years. VAS back demonstrated a stronger correlation than VAS leg with PROMIS PF at all timepoints. PROMIS PF scores were negatively associated with both VAS back and VAS leg at all timepoints. Fisher z-test revealed VAS back to have a stronger correlation with PROMIS PF (p = 0.025) than VAS leg.

CONCLUSION

In the setting of MIS TLIF, physical function as evaluated by PROMIS PF, had a stronger correlation with VAS back than VAS leg at 6 months. This suggests that postoperative PROMIS PF scores may be more influenced by back pain than with leg pain.

Validating the VR-12 Physical Function Instrument After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with SF-12, PROMIS, and NDI

BACKGROUND

Development and validation of Veterans RAND 12-item (VR-12) physical component survey (PCS) has been established among civilian and veteran populations but it has not been examined among anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) patients.

PURPOSES/QUESTIONS

We sought to validate legacy patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with VR-12 PCS among patients undergoing ACDF procedures.

METHODS

A prospectively collected surgical registry was retrospectively evaluated for elective single or multi-level ACDFs performed for degenerative spinal pathologies from January 2014 to August 2019. Exclusion criteria included missing pre-operative surveys and surgery for trauma, metastasis, or infection. Demographic variables, baseline pathologies, and peri-operative variables were collected. A paired t test evaluated the change from the pre-operative score to each post-operative timepoint for VR-12 PCS, the 12-item Short-Form Survey (SF-12) PCS, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS-PF), and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement was calculated at each timepoint. Correlation was evaluated with a Pearson's correlation coefficient and time-independent partial correlation.

RESULTS

Of the 202 patients who underwent ACDF, 41.1% were female and the average age was 49.5 years. All PROMs had statistically significantly increased from baseline when compared with post-operative timepoints (12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years). MCID achievement rates increased through 2 years. All timepoints revealed strong VR-12 PCS correlations with SF-12 PCS, PROMIS-PF, and NDI scores.

CONCLUSION

VR-12 PCS was strongly correlated with the well-validated SF-12 PCS and NDI metrics as well as with the more recent PROMIS-PF. All PROMs demonstrated statistically significant improvement in patients post-operatively. VR-12 PCS is a valid measure of physical function among patients undergoing ACDF.

Reporting and utilization of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) measures in orthopedic research and practice: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information SystemⓇ (PROMISⓇ) is a dynamic system of psychometrically sound patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. There has been a recent increase in the use of PROMIS measures, yet little has been written about the reporting of these measures in the field of orthopedics. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review to determine the uptake of PROMIS measures across orthopedics and to identify the type of PROMIS measures and domains that are most commonly used in orthopedic research and practice.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus using keywords and database-specific subject headings to capture orthopedic studies reporting PROMIS measures through November 2018. Our inclusion criteria were use of PROMIS measures as an outcome or used to describe a population of patients in an orthopedic setting in patients ≥ 18 years of age. We excluded non-quantitative studies, reviews, and case reports.

RESULTS

Our final search yielded 88 studies published from 2013 through 2018, with 57% (50 studies) published in 2018 alone. By body region, 28% (25 studies) reported PROMIS measures in the upper extremity (shoulder, elbow, hand), 36% (32 studies) reported PROMIS measures in the lower extremity (hip, knee, ankle, foot), 19% (17 studies) reported PROMIS measures in the spine, 10% (9 studies) reported PROMIS measures in trauma patients, and 6% (5 studies) reported PROMIS measures in general orthopedic patients. The majority of studies reported between one and three PROMIS domains (82%, 73 studies). The PROMIS Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT) approach was most commonly used (81%, 72 studies). The most frequently reported PROMIS domains were physical function (81%, 71 studies) and pain interference (61%, 54 studies).

CONCLUSION

Our review found an increase in the reporting of PROMIS measures over the recent years. Utilization of PROMIS measures in orthopedic populations is clinically appropriate and can facilitate communication of outcomes across different provider types and with reduced respondent burden.

REGISTRATION

The protocol for this systematic review was designed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and is registered with the PROSPERO database (CRD42018088260).

PROMIS Physical Function Predicts Postoperative Pain and Disability Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine if preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS PF) score is predictive of improvement in pain and physical function following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Few studies have investigated the predictive nature of PROMIS PF of patients undergoing spine surgery, such as ACDF.

METHODS

Patients undergoing a primary, 1-3-level ACDF were retrospectively reviewed and were stratified into 3 cohorts according to preoperative PROMIS PF scores: minimal disability (score 50-60), mild disability (score 40-50), moderate disability (score 30-40), and severe disability (score 20-30). Preoperative PROMIS PF cohorts were tested for an association with demographics, perioperative characteristics, and improvement in Neck Disability Index (NDI), 12-Item Short-Form Physical Component Score (SF-12 PCS), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) neck and arm pain using χ analysis and multivariate linear regression.

RESULTS

A total of 126 patients were included: 11 had a minimal disability, 44 had mild disability, 54 had moderate disability, and 17 had severe disability. Patients with a severe disability experienced no statistically significant increase in their length of stay. Greater preoperative disability demonstrated lower NDI and SF-12 PCS scores preoperatively and at each postoperative timepoint. Greater preoperative disability had worse VAS neck and arm pain preoperatively and 6-week and 3-month postoperatively. Although patients with severe disability trended worse VAS neck and arm pain at the 6-month follow-up, this did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

In this investigation, patients with worse PROMIS PF scores reported greater pain and disability in the preoperative period and experienced less improvement in NDI, SF-12 PCS, and VAS back and leg following ACDF. PROMIS PF is an efficient and accurate instrument that can effectively evaluate strength, mobility, and coordination in the preoperative period and may be used to predict clinical outcomes following ACDF.

Psychometric Evaluation of Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Computer Adaptive Testing in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery: An Analysis of Responsiveness, Coverage, Discriminant Validity, and Concurrent Validity

INTRODUCTION

Although the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is increasingly being used, there are few studies assessing the psychometric properties of PROMIS in minimally invasive spine (MIS) surgery. Thus, the purpose of this study was to perform a psychometric evaluation of PROMIS Physical Function Computer Adaptive Testing (PROMIS-PF CAT) in MIS lumbar surgery.

METHODS

The patient-reported outcome measures collected preoperatively and postoperatively of patients undergoing MIS lumbar surgery were retrospectively analyzed to assess responsiveness, coverage, discriminant validity, and concurrent validity of PROMIS-PF CAT.

RESULTS

Four hundred twenty-one patients were included. The responsiveness of PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) was lower than that of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) in the decompression subgroup. Although the ODI had a ceiling effect of 16.7% at 1 year, the Short-Form 12 physical health score and PROMIS-PF did not show floor or ceiling effects. PROMIS-PF demonstrated discriminant validity preoperatively and postoperatively and convergent validity with the ODI, as evidenced by a significant strong negative correlation but not with the Short-Form 12 Physical Health Score, as evidenced by the variability in strength of correlation.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the PROMIS-PF showed lower responsiveness than the ODI, particularly in the decompression subgroup, it demonstrated discriminant validity preoperatively and postoperatively, convergent validity with ODI, and better coverage than ODI. These findings suggest that the PROMIS-PF CAT demonstrates reasonable psychometric properties and may be a good surrogate for the ODI.

Using PROMIS-29 to predict Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores using a national sample of cervical spine surgery patients

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are valuable tools for evaluating the success of spine surgery, with the Neck Disability Index (NDI) commonly used to assess pain-related disability. Recently, patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) has gained attention in its ability to measure PROs across general patient populations. However, PROMIS is not condition-specific so spine researchers are reluctant to incorporate it in place of common legacy measures.

PURPOSE

To compare the PROMIS-29 (v2.0) to the NDI and compute a conversion equation.

STUDY DESIGN

This study retrospectively analyzes prospectively collected data from the cervical module of national spine registry, the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD).

PATIENT SAMPLE

The QOD was queried for cervical spine surgery patients with PROMIS-29 and NDI scores. The cervical module of QOD includes patients undergoing primary or revision surgery for cervical degenerative spine diseases. Exclusion criteria included age under 18 years and diagnoses of infection, tumor, or trauma as the cause of cervical-related pain.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The outcome of interest for this study was a conversion equation from PROMIS-29 to NDI.

METHODS

The PROMIS-29 includes seven 4-item domains each rated on a 5-point scale: Physical function, depression, anxiety, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities (social roles), and pain interference plus one stand-alone pain intensity item. The NDI contains 10 pain-related questions scored from 0 (no pain) to 5 (most severe pain). Outcomes were collected prior to surgery and at 3- and 12-month post surgery. Patients were included in the current analysis if they had outcome data available at one or more time points. Multivariable mixed effects regression models predicting NDI scores from PROMIS-29 domains were conducted in a development data set and validated in a separate data set. Predicted NDI scores were plotted against NDI scores to determine how well PROMIS-29 domains predicted NDI. Conversion equations were created from the PROMIS-29 regression coefficients.

RESULTS

2,018 patients from 18 US hospitals were included (mean age=57 years (SD=12)) with 48% female, 87% Caucasian, and 11% had revision surgery. Strong correlations were found between NDI and pain interference (r=0.79), pain intensity (r=0.74), social roles (r=-0.71), physical function (r=-0.69), sleep disturbance (r=0.63), fatigue (r=0.63), and anxiety (r=0.54). Correlation between NDI and depression (r=0.49) was slightly weaker. The pattern of correlations was consistent across timepoints. Four conversion equations were created for NDI using (1) only pain interference, (2) only physical function, (3) pain interference and physical function, and (4) the five statistically significant domains of pain interference, physical function, social roles, sleep disturbance, and anxiety, plus the pain intensity item. Equations 1, 3, and 4 were the best predictors of NDI, predicting approximately 80% of NDI scores within 15 points in the validation data set. Equation 4 (NDI_%=18.897+0.855*[pain interference_raw]-0.694*[physical function_raw]+2.010*[pain intensity_raw]-0.663*[social roles_raw]+0.732*[sleep disturbance_raw]+0.426*[anxiety_raw]) predicted NDI most accurately with an R² between the predicted and actual NDI scores of 0.72. Model 1 (R² = 0.62; NDI_%=-4.055+3.164*[pain interference_raw])) and Model 3 (R²=0.65; NDI%=17.321+2.543*[pain interference_raw]-1.012*[physical function_raw]) also had good accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest accurate NDI scores can be derived from PROMIS-29 domains. Clinicians who want to move from NDI to PROMIS-29 can use this equation to obtain estimated NDI scores when only collecting PROMIS-29. These results support the use of PROMIS-29 in cervical surgery populations and underscore the idea that PROMIS-29 domains have the potential to replace disease-specific traditional PROMs.

Do PROMIS Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Depression Correlate to the Oswestry Disability Index and Neck Disability Index in Spine Trauma Patients?

STUDY DESIGN

Correlational study.

OBJECTIVE

In spine trauma patients, we aimed to assess the correlation of patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and Depression scores with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) ODI/NDI scores.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The ODI and NDI were intended as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients seeking spine care. To date, the PROMIS has not been studied in the spine trauma population.

METHODS

Between January 1, 2015 and December 13, 2017, patients presenting to a single, level 1 trauma center spine clinic with known spine trauma were identified. A total of 56 patients (52 operative, 4 nonoperative) representing 181 encounters were identified. PROMIS PF, PI, and Depression, as well as the ODI or NDI, were administered to patients. Spearman rho (ρ) were calculated between PROMs.

RESULTS

A strong correlation exists between PROMIS PI and the ODI (ρ = 0.79, P < 0.001), while a strong-moderate correlation exists between PROMIS PF and the ODI (ρ = -0.61, P < 0.001). A moderate correlation exists between PROMIS Depression and the ODI (ρ = 0.54, P < 0.001). Strong correlations exist between PROMIS PI and the NDI (ρ = 0.71, P < 0.001) and PROMIS Depression and the NDI (ρ = 0.73, P < 0.001). A poor correlation exists between PROMIS PF and the NDI (ρ = -0.28, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

PROMIS PF, PI, and Depression domains significantly correlate with the ODI and NDI; however, only PROMIS PI strongly correlates with both the NDI and ODI. This suggests that PROMIS PI can be used to capture similar information to that of the ODI or NDI but that PROMIS PF and Depression may offer additional clinical information.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

The Relationship Between Preoperative PROMIS Scores With Postoperative Improvements in Physical Function After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

OBJECTIVE

Assess preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) scores and differences between preoperative and postoperative PROMIS-PF scores for patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

After Institutional Review Board approval, a prospectively maintained surgical registry was retrospectively reviewed for elective spine surgeries of nontraumatic, degenerative pathology between 2015-2018. Inclusion criteria were primary or revision, single-level ACDF procedures. Multilevel procedures and patients without preoperative surveys were excluded. A preoperative PROMIS score cutoff of 35 divided patients into PROMIS-PF score categories (e.g. , ≥ 35.0, < 35.0). Categorical and continuous variables were evaluated with chi-square tests and t-tests. Linear regression analyzed PROMIS-PF score improvement.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients were selected, the high and low PROMIS-PF subgroups only differed in mean age (49.1 vs. 41.3, p = 0.002). Significant differences in PROMIS-PF scores were observed among high and low preoperative PROMIS-PF score subgroups at 6 weeks (p = 0.006), 12 weeks (p = 0.006), and 6 months (p = 0.014). Mean differences between preoperative and postoperative PROMIS-PF scores were significantly different between the high and low PROMIS-PF subgroups at 6 weeks (p = 0.041) and 1 year (p = 0.038). A significant negative association was observed between preoperative PROMIS scores and magnitude of improvement at the 6-week postoperative time point (slope = -0.6291, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with low preoperative PROMIS-PF scores demonstrated greater improvements at 6 weeks and 1 year. Clinicians should consider patients with low preoperative PROMIS-PF scores to be in the unique position to potentially experience larger postoperative improvement magnitudes than patients with higher preoperative PROMIS-PF scores.

Clinical Interpretation of the Neck Functional Status Computerized Adaptive Test

BACKGROUND

Clinical interpretation of patient-reported outcome measures is an essential step in patient-centered care. Interpretation of scores derived from the Neck Functional Status Computerized Adaptive Test (NFS-CAT) has not been studied.

OBJECTIVES

To (1) assess the reliability of point estimates and improvement scores, (2) determine thresholds of minimal clinically important improvement (MCII), and (3) develop a functional staging model to facilitate clinical interpretation of NFS-CAT scores.

METHODS

A secondary retrospective cohort analysis was performed using data from patients aged 14 to 89 years who started an episode of care for neck impairments during 2016-2017 and completed the NFS-CAT at admission. The reliability of point estimates and of improvement scores was derived from the NFS-CAT standard error of measurement. The MCII was estimated by combining distribution- and anchor-based approaches. A functional staging model was developed to describe clinical meaningfulness of the quantitative scores provided by the NFS-CAT.

RESULTS

Of 250 741 patients who completed the NFS-CAT at admission (mean ± SD age, 54 ± 16 years; 65% female), 169±039 (67%) also completed the NFS-CAT at discharge. The standard error of measurement was stable across the measurement continuum, ranging from 3.7 to 3.9 NFS-CAT points. Minimal detectable improvement was 6.8 points at the 90% confidence level. The estimate of the MCII was 8.1 points, with more change points needed to achieve the MCII for patients with lower baseline scores. Large rates of functional staging change during treatment were observed, demonstrating responsiveness of the functional staging model.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated how the NFS-CAT can be interpreted to better assist clinicians and patients with neck impairments during outpatient rehabilitation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapy, level 2b. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(12):875-886. Epub 10 Jul 2019. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.8862.

A Prospective, Psychometric Validation of National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, Pain Interference, and Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Testing in Cervical Spine Patients: Successes and Key Limitations

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective Cohort Study OBJECTIVE.: The aim of this study was to validate the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) against existing patient-reported outcomes in the cervical spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Current patient-reported outcomes in cervical spine have substantial limitations. PROMIS offers the potential for improved psychometric properties with reduced questionnaire burden.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing cervical spine surgery at a single institution between 2016 and 2018 were prospectively enrolled. Patients completed questionnaires (36-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-36], Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale arm/neck, and PROMIS pain Interference [PI], physical Function [PF], and Upper Extremity [UE]) preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Demographic data, diagnosis, and procedural data were recorded. Validation of the instruments was completed with a Rasch Model as well as measurement of coverage, efficiency, test-retest reliability, responsiveness, and convergent validity.

RESULTS

Of 197 patients who completed the preoperative survey, 164 were eligible for 6-month follow-up and 139 completed 6-month postoperative surveys. The most common diagnoses were radiculopathy (37.6%), myeloradiculopathy (30.5%), and myelopathy (28.4%). All studied instruments had acceptable fit to a Rasch model. PROMIS computer adaptive testings (CATs) demonstrated improved average time to completion for PI (39 seconds), PF (47 seconds), and UE (54  seconds), compared to NDI (117 s) and SF-36 PCS (175 seconds). Responsiveness for PROMIS CATs was similar to NDI and SF-36, test-retest reliability was lower for PI (intraclass correlation: 0.68), PF (0.70), and UE (0.59), compared to NDI (0.86) and PCS (0.85). For convergent validity, PI was strongly correlated to NDI and PF to SF-36 PCS. There were no significant floor or ceiling effects for the PROMIS domains, although UE had preoperative clustering (n = 18) at a high score (56.4) and PI had postoperative clustering (n = 27) at a low score (38.7).

CONCLUSION

PROMIS CATs demonstrate several advantages, including efficiency and responsiveness, while demonstrating good convergent validity with legacy instruments. Nevertheless, CATs had lower test-retest reliability and had significant clustering at higher levels of function for the PI and UE CATs. These limitations must be considered before broad adoption of CATs in cervical spine patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Responsiveness of the PROMIS and its Concurrent Validity with Other Region- and Condition-specific PROMs in Patients Undergoing Carpal Tunnel Release

BACKGROUND

The Patient-reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) continues to be an important universal patient-reported outcomes measure (PROM) in orthopaedic surgery. However, there is concern about the performance of the PROMIS as a general health questionnaire in hand surgery compared with the performance of region- and condition-specific PROMs such as the Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ) and the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), respectively. To ensure that PROMIS domains capture patient-reported outcomes to the same degree as region- and condition-specific PROMs do, comparing PROM performance is necessary.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Which PROMs demonstrate high responsiveness among patients undergoing carpal tunnel release (CTR)? (2) Which of the PROMIS domains (Physical Function [PF], Upper Extremity [UE], and Pain Interference [PI]) demonstrate concurrent validity with the HHQ and BCTQ domains?

METHODS

In this prospective study, between November 2014 and October 2016, patients with carpal tunnel syndrome visiting a single surgeon who elected to undergo CTR completed the BCTQ, MHQ, and PROMIS UE, PF, and PI domains at each visit. A total of 101 patients agreed to participate. Of these, 31 patients (31%) did not return for a followup visit at least 6 weeks after CTR and were excluded, leaving a final sample of 70 patients (69%). We compared the PROMIS against region- and condition-specific PROMs in terms of responsiveness and concurrent validity. Responsiveness was determined using Cohen's d or the effect-size index (ESI). The larger the absolute value of the ESI, the greater the effect size. Using the ESI allows surgeons to better quantify the impact of CTR, with a medium ESI (that is, 0.5) representing a visible clinical change to a careful observer. Concurrent validity was determined using Spearman's correlation coefficient with correlation strengths categorized as excellent (> 0.7), excellent-good (0.61-0.70), good (0.4-0.6), and poor (< 0.4). Significance was set a priori at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Among PROMIS domains, the PI demonstrated the best responsiveness (ESI = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.39-1.08), followed by the UE (ESI = -0.66; 95% CI, -1.00 to -0.31). For the MHQ, the Satisfaction domain had the largest effect size (ESI = -1.48; 95% CI, -1.85 to -1.09), while for the BCTQ, the Symptom Severity domain had the best responsiveness (ESI = 1.54; 95% CI, 1.14-1.91). The PROMIS UE and PI domains demonstrated excellent-good to excellent correlations to the total MHQ and BCTQ-Functional Status scores (preoperative UE to MHQ: ρ = 0.68; PI to MHQ: ρ = 0.74; UE to BCTQ-Functional Status: ρ = 0.74; PI to BCTQ-Functional Status: ρ = 0.67; all p < 0.001), while the PROMIS PF demonstrated poor correlations with the same domains (preoperative PF to MHQ; ρ = 0.33; UE to BCTQ-Functional Status: ρ = 0.39; both p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The PROMIS UE and PI domains demonstrated slightly worse responsiveness than the MHQ and BCTQ domains that was nonetheless acceptable. The PROMIS PF domain was unresponsive. All three PROMIS domains correlated with the MHQ and BCTQ, but the PROMIS UE and PI domains had notably stronger correlations to the MHQ and BCTQ domains than the PF domain did. We feel that the PROMIS UE and PI can be used to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing CTR, while also providing more robust insight into overall health status because they are general PROMs. However, we do not recommend the PROMIS PF for evaluating patients undergoing CTR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, diagnostic study.

Patient Reported Outcomes: The Foundation of Value

As we transition from volume-based to value-based health care, orthopedic surgeons must understand the role of outcomes in measuring value. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) offer a number of advantages in orthopedic trauma compared with traditional clinical and radiographic results while also being an important indicator of the patient's perception of their condition. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, developed and funded by the National Institutes of Health, has a number of features that make PRO date collection less burdensome for providers and patients. Patient-specific factors, including comorbidities, mental health, social support, and preinjury function need to be accounted for in our assessment, because all of these factors have demonstrated an impact on outcomes. Orthopedic surgeons should be aware of how they can transition their practice in an era of value-based health care in a manner that will benefit their patients and provide insight into their own clinical practice. Prospective collection of PROs is no longer limited to academic surgeons conducting research, and all orthopedic surgeons should consider incorporating PROs into their daily clinical practice. Orthopedic surgeons must maintain an active role in the development of policies and reimbursement models to advocate for and serve our patients.

Which NDI domains best predict change in physical function in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Physical function is a critical aspect of patient outcomes. NDI is a widely validated outcome measure in cervical spine disease, yet to what extent its individual domains predict changes in physical function remains unknown.

PURPOSE

To examine the impact of individual NDI domains on changes in physical function in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Prospective Cohort Study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Adult patients undergoing cervical spine surgery, excluding those undergoing surgery for instability due to trauma.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Absolute change in outcome measures (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Physical Function [PF], Short Form 36 [SF-36] Physical Component Score [PCS], and Neck Disability Index [NDI]) from pre- to postoperatively, correlation of NDI individual domains with PROMIS PF and SF-36 PCS (preoperatively, postoperatively, and change from pre- to postoperatively).

METHODS

Patients undergoing cervical spine surgery between 2016 and 2018 were prospectively enrolled. Patients completed questionnaires (NDI, SF-36 PCS, and PROMIS PF) preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Patient demographics, including age, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and underlying diagnoses were collected. Comparisons between NDI scores preoperatively versus postoperatively were conducted using Wilcoxon signed rank sum test. Correlations of NDI individual items and PROMIS/SF-36 were assessed using Pearson correlation. A stepwise linear regression analysis was performed to identify NDI items that are independently predictive of PROMIS PF and SF-36 PCS.

RESULTS

A total of 137 patients were included in the study, with mean age 56.9 years (range 24.4-84.9). Each of the NDI domains as well as PROMIS PF and SF-36 PCS demonstrated significant improvement following cervical spine surgery (p<.001). Changes in all NDI domains demonstrated significant negative correlation with changes in PROMIS PF, with recreation (R=-0.537, p<.001), work (R=-0.514, p<.001), and pain intensity (R=-0.488, p<.001) having the greatest negative correlation. Changes in all NDI domains demonstrated significant negative correlation with changes in SF-36 PCS, with recreation (R=-0.451, p<.001), work (R=-0.443, p<.001), lifting (R=-0.373, p<.001), and driving (R=-0.373, p<.001) having the greatest negative correlation. For PROMIS PF, the NDI domains that were independently associated with changes in PF were work (R=-0.092, p=.001), pain intensity (R=-0.089, p=.003), and recreation (R=-0.067, p=.004). For SF-36 PCS, the NDI items that were independently associated with changes in PCS were work (R=-0.269, p=.003) and recreation (R=-0.215, p=.002).

CONCLUSIONS

All NDI domains improve significantly after cervical spine surgery and demonstrate significant correlation with changes in PROMIS PF and SF-36 PCS. The work, recreation, and pain intensity domains were the only independent predictors of physical function changes postoperatively. Considering physical function, our findings highlight the importance of presenting changes in individual NDI domains in addition to the total score.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function and pain interference in spine surgery

OBJECTIVE

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is an adaptive, self-reported outcomes assessment tool that utilizes item response theory and computer adaptive testing to efficiently and precisely evaluate symptoms and perceived health status. Efforts to implement and report PROMIS outcomes in spine clinical practice remain limited. The objective of this retrospective cohort study is to evaluate the performance and psychometric properties of PROMIS physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI) among patients undergoing spine surgery.

METHODS

The authors identified all patients who underwent spine surgery at their institution between 2016 and 2018, and for whom there was retrievable PROMIS data. Descriptive statistics were calculated to summarize demographics, operative characteristics, and patient-reported outcomes. Assessments were evaluated preoperatively, and postoperatively within 2 months (early), 6 months (intermediate), and up to 2 years (late). Pairwise change scores were calculated to evaluate within-subjects differences and construct responsiveness over time. Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the association between PROMIS PF and PI domains. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the primary diagnoses of cervical radiculopathy, cervical myelopathy, or lumbar degenerative disease.

RESULTS

A total of 2770 patients (1395 males, 50.4%) were included in the analysis. The mean age at the time of surgery was 57.3 ± 14.4 years. Mean postoperative follow-up duration was 7.6 ± 6.2 months. Preoperatively, patients scored an average 15.1 ± 7.4 points below the normative population (mean 50 ± 10 points) in PF, and 15.8 ± 6.8 points above the mean in PI. PROMIS PF required a mean of 4.1 ± 0.6 questions and median 40 seconds (interquartile range [IQR] 29-58 seconds) to be completed, which was similar to PI (median 4.3 ± 1.1 questions and 38 seconds [IQR 27-59 seconds]). Patients experienced clinically meaningful improvements in PF and PI, which were sustained throughout the postoperative course. PROMIS instruments were able to capture anticipated changes in PF and PI, although to a lesser degree in PF early postoperatively. There was a strong negative correlation between PROMIS PF and PI scores at baseline (Pearson's r = -0.72) and during follow-up appointments (early, intermediate, and late |r| > 0.6, each). Subgroup analysis demonstrated similar results within diagnostic groups compared to the overall cohort. However, the burden of PF limitations and PI was greater within the lumbar spine disease subgroup, compared to patients with cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving care at a tertiary spine surgery outpatient clinic experience significant overall disability and PI, as measured by PROMIS PF and PI computer adaptive tests. PROMIS PF and PI health domains are strongly correlated, responsive to changes over time, and facilitate time-efficient evaluations of perceived health status outcomes in patients undergoing spine surgery.

PROMIS Correlates With Legacy Outcome Measures in Patients With Neck Pain and Improves Upon NDI When Assessing Disability in Cervical Deformity

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the ability of patient reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) assessments to capture disability related to cervical sagittal alignment and secondarily to compare these findings to legacy outcome measures.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

PROMIS is a validated patient-reported outcome metric that is increasing in popularity due to its speed of administration relative to legacy metrics. The ability of PROMIS to capture disability from sagittal alignment and baseline health status in patients with neck pain has not been investigated.

METHODS

Patients presenting with a chief complaint of neck pain from December 2016 to July 2017 were included. Demographics and comorbidities were retrospectively collected. All patients prospectively completed the neck disability index (NDI), EQ-5D, visual analog scale (VAS) neck, VAS arm, PROMIS physical function, PROMIS pain intensity, and PROMIS pain interference metrics. Cervical sagittal alignment parameters were measured on standing X-rays. The correlations between outcome measures, health status indexes, psychiatric diagnoses, and sagittal alignment were analyzed.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-six patients were included. The sample was 58.4% female with a mean age of 55.1 years. In patients with neck pain, PROMIS physical function correlated strongly with the NDI (r = -0.763, P < 0.01), EQ-5D (r = 0.616, P < 0.01), VAS neck pain (-0.466, P < 0.01), and VAS arm pain (r = -0.388, P < 0.01). One hundred seventy-seven patients (69.96%) were included in the radiographic analysis. 20.3% of the radiographic cohort had cervical deformity and in this group, less cervical lordosis correlated with PROMIS pain intensity and EQ-5D but not NDI. In patients without cervical deformity, no outcome metric was found to correlate significantly with cervical alignment parameters.

CONCLUSION

PROMIS domains correlated strongly with legacy outcome metrics. For the whole cohort, sagittal alignment was not correlated with outcomes. In patients with sagittal cervical deformity, worsening alignment correlated with PROMIS pain intensity and EQ-5D but not NDI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Prediction of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) using PROMIS-29 in a national sample of lumbar spine surgery patients

PURPOSE

The primary purpose was to examine the measurement properties of the PROMIS-29 to better understand its use in patients undergoing spine surgery. A secondary objective was to calculate a predictive equation between PROMIS-29 and ODI, to allow clinicians and researchers to determine a predicted ODI score based on PROMIS short form scores.

METHODS

719 patients with PROMIS v2.0 and ODI responses were queried from the quality outcomes database. Validity was assessed using coefficient omega, ceiling/floor effects, and confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariable regression predicting ODI scores from PROMIS-29 domains was used to create a predictive equation. Predicted ODI scores were plotted against ODI scores to determine how well PROMIS-29 domains predicted ODI.

RESULTS

Results showed good reliability and validity of PROMIS-29 in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: convergent and discriminant validity, low floor/ceiling effects, and unidimensional domains. The conversion equation used 6 PROMIS-29 domains (ODI_% =  37.847- 1.475*[PF_raw] + 1.842*[PAIN_raw] + 0.557*[SD_raw] - 0.642*[SR_raw] + 0.478*[PI_raw] + 0.295*[DEP_raw]). Correlation between the predicted and actual ODI scores was R = 0.88, R² = 0.78, suggesting that the equation predicted ODI scores that are strongly correlated with actual ODI scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Good measurement properties support the use of PROMIS-29 in spine surgery patients. Findings suggest accurate ODI scores can be derived from PROMIS-29 domains. Clinicians who want to move from ODI to PROMIS-29 can use this equation to obtain estimated ODI scores when only collecting PROMIS-29. These results support the idea that PROMIS-29 domains have the potential to replace disease-specific traditional PROMs.