Responsiveness of routine diagnostic tests for vertebral osteomyelitis may be influenced by the infecting organism

Influence factors of metagenomic next-generation sequencing negative results in diagnosed patients with spinal infection

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence factors of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) negative results in the diagnosed patients with spinal infection. mNGS test was applied in a cohort of 114 patients with suspected spinal infection, among which 56 patients had a final diagnosis of spinal infection. mNGS achieved a sensitivity of 75.0% (95% CI, 61.6% to 85.6%) and a specificity of 84.5% (95% CI, 72.6% to 92.7%), using histopathology and culture results as reference. Diagnosed patients with a negative culture result had lower white blood cell account, percentage of neutrophilic granulocyte, C-reactive protein (all P<0.05) and relatively higher rate of prior antimicrobial treatment history (P=0.059). However, diagnosed patients with a negative mNGS result did not have such difference with mNGS-positive patients, suggesting that mNGS was not strictly limited by the above indicators, which presented the advantages of this technique from another point of view.

Escalation of antimicrobial resistance among MRSA part 2: focus on infections and treatment

INTRODUCTION

MRSA is associated with causing a variety of infections including skin and skin structure infections, catheter and device-related (e.g. central venous catheter, prosthetic heart valve) infections, infectious endocarditis, blood stream infections, bone, and joint infections (e.g. osteomyelitis, prosthetic joint, surgical site), central nervous system infections (e.g. meningitis, brain/spinal cord abscess, ventriculitis, hydrocephalus), respiratory tract infections (e.g. hospital-acquired pneumonia, ventilator-associated pneumonia), urinary tract infections, and gastrointestinal infections. The emergence and spread of multidrug resistant (MDR) MRSA clones has limited therapeutic options. Older agents such as vancomycin, linezolid and daptomycin and a variety of newer MRSA antimicrobials and combination therapy are available to treat serious MRSA infections.

AREAS COVERED

The authors discuss infections caused by MRSA as well as common older and newer antimicrobials and combination therapy for MRSA infections. A literature search of MRSA was performed via PubMed (up to September 2022), using the keywords: antimicrobial resistance; β-lactams; multidrug resistance, Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin; glycolipopeptides.

EXPERT OPINION

Innovation, discovery, and development of new and novel classes of antimicrobial agents are critical to expand effective therapeutic options. The authors encourage the judicious use of antimicrobials in accordance with antimicrobial stewardship programs along with infection-control measures to minimize the spread of MRSA.

Analysis of the diagnostic efficacy of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube assay for preoperative differential diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis

Background

Differential diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis is important for the clinical management of patients, especially in populations with spinal bone destruction. There are few effective tools for preoperative differential diagnosis in these populations. The QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) test has good sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of tuberculosis, but its efficacy in preoperative diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis has rarely been investigated.

Method

A total of 123 consecutive patients with suspected spinal tuberculosis hospitalized from March 20, 2020, to April 10, 2022, were included, and the QFT-GIT test was performed on each patient. We retrospectively collected clinical data from these patients. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted with the TB Ag-Nil values. The cutoff point was calculated from the ROC curve of 61 patients in the study cohort, and the diagnostic validity of the cutoff point was verified in a new cohort of 62 patients. The correlations between TB Ag-Nil values and other clinical characteristics of the patients were analyzed.

Results

Of the 123 patients included in the study, 51 had confirmed tuberculosis, and 72 had non-tuberculosis disease (AUC=0.866, 95% CI: 0.798-0.933, P&lt;0.0001). In patients with spinal tuberculosis, the QFT-GIT test sensitivity was 92.16% (95% CI: 80.25%-97.46%), and the specificity was 67.14% (95% CI: 54.77%-77.62%). The accuracy of diagnostic tests in the validation cohort increased from 77.42% to 80.65% when a new cutoff point was selected (1.58 IU/mL) from the ROC curve of the study cohort. The TB Ag-Nil values in tuberculosis patients were correlated with the duration of the patients’ disease (r=0.4148, P=0.0025).

Conclusion

The QFT-GIT test is an important test for preoperative differential diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis with high sensitivity but low specificity. The diagnostic efficacy of the QFT-GIT test can be significantly improved via application of a new threshold (1.58 IU/mL), and the intensity of the QFT-GIT test findings in spinal tuberculosis may be related to the duration of a patient’s disease.

Use of Novel Strategies to Develop Guidelines for Management of Pyogenic Osteomyelitis in Adults: A WikiGuidelines Group Consensus Statement

IMPORTANCE

Traditional approaches to practice guidelines frequently result in dissociation between strength of recommendation and quality of evidence.

OBJECTIVE

To construct a clinical guideline for pyogenic osteomyelitis management, with a new standard of evidence to resolve the gap between strength of recommendation and quality of evidence, through the use of a novel open access approach utilizing social media tools.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

This consensus statement and systematic review study used a novel approach from the WikiGuidelines Group, an open access collaborative research project, to construct clinical guidelines for pyogenic osteomyelitis. In June 2021 and February 2022, authors recruited via social media conducted multiple PubMed literature searches, including all years and languages, regarding osteomyelitis management; criteria for article quality and inclusion were specified in the group's charter. The GRADE system for evaluating evidence was not used based on previously published concerns regarding the potential dissociation between strength of recommendation and quality of evidence. Instead, the charter required that clear recommendations be made only when reproducible, prospective, controlled studies provided hypothesis-confirming evidence. In the absence of such data, clinical reviews were drafted to discuss pros and cons of care choices. Both clear recommendations and clinical reviews were planned with the intention to be regularly updated as new data become available.

FINDINGS

Sixty-three participants with diverse expertise from 8 countries developed the group's charter and its first guideline on pyogenic osteomyelitis. These participants included both nonacademic and academic physicians and pharmacists specializing in general internal medicine or hospital medicine, infectious diseases, orthopedic surgery, pharmacology, and medical microbiology. Of the 7 questions addressed in the guideline, 2 clear recommendations were offered for the use of oral antibiotic therapy and the duration of therapy. In addition, 5 clinical reviews were authored addressing diagnosis, approaches to osteomyelitis underlying a pressure ulcer, timing for the administration of empirical therapy, specific antimicrobial options (including empirical regimens, use of antimicrobials targeting resistant pathogens, the role of bone penetration, and the use of rifampin as adjunctive therapy), and the role of biomarkers and imaging to assess responses to therapy.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The WikiGuidelines approach offers a novel methodology for clinical guideline development that precludes recommendations based on low-quality data or opinion. The primary limitation is the need for more rigorous clinical investigations, enabling additional clear recommendations for clinical questions currently unresolved by high-quality data.

An Isolated Radiographic Finding of Spontaneous Vertebral Osteomyelitis

Vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) is an infection of the vertebral body, most often arising secondary to hematogenous spread or contiguous spread from local soft tissue infection. Establishing a diagnosis of VO requires a high index of suspicion as patients often present with nonspecific symptoms such as pain of the affected vertebral segments along with leukocytosis and elevated inflammatory markers. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has high sensitivity and specificity for detecting VO, even in the early phases of infection. Diagnosis is generally confirmed with blood cultures or vertebral biopsy demonstrating a culprit organism and treatment is tailored to the identified organism. However, some patients may have culture-negative VO that still necessitates antimicrobial treatment. Imaging alone may be an acceptable form of diagnosis that can allow for prompt empiric antibiotic therapy, reducing the need for invasive diagnostic measures. We present a case of a 46-year-old male with a past medical history of type 2 diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and prior transient ischemic attack (TIA). The patient presented with signs and symptoms of another TIA as well as new-onset neck and upper back pain. MRI in the neurologic workup demonstrated findings consistent with osteomyelitis of the C5 and C6 cervical vertebrae. Previous imaging showed no evidence of vertebral dysfunction. This patient presented with new-onset VO in the absence of systemic symptoms or elevation of inflammatory markers and no identified source of infection. Based on imaging and clinical presentation, empiric antibiotic treatment was initiated resulting in clinical improvement and resolution of VO on imaging. This case demonstrates an atypical presentation of VO and describes the benefit of MRI in recognizing infection in the absence of concurrent typical findings, which allowed for the initiation of empiric therapy.