1
|
Lambio C, Schmitz T, Elson R, Butler J, Roth A, Feller S, Savaskan N, Lakes T. Exploring the Spatial Relative Risk of COVID-19 in Berlin-Neukölln. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:ijerph20105830. [PMID: 37239558 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20105830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Identifying areas with high and low infection rates can provide important etiological clues. Usually, areas with high and low infection rates are identified by aggregating epidemiological data into geographical units, such as administrative areas. This assumes that the distribution of population numbers, infection rates, and resulting risks is constant across space. This assumption is, however, often false and is commonly known as the modifiable area unit problem. This article develops a spatial relative risk surface by using kernel density estimation to identify statistically significant areas of high risk by comparing the spatial distribution of address-level COVID-19 cases and the underlying population at risk in Berlin-Neukölln. Our findings show that there are varying areas of statistically significant high and low risk that straddle administrative boundaries. The findings of this exploratory analysis further highlight topics such as, e.g., Why were mostly affluent areas affected during the first wave? What lessons can be learned from areas with low infection rates? How important are built structures as drivers of COVID-19? How large is the effect of the socio-economic situation on COVID-19 infections? We conclude that it is of great importance to provide access to and analyse fine-resolution data to be able to understand the spread of the disease and address tailored health measures in urban settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Lambio
- Geography Department, Applied Geoinformation Science Lab, Humboldt-University Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany
| | - Tillman Schmitz
- Geography Department, Applied Geoinformation Science Lab, Humboldt-University Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany
| | - Richard Elson
- UK Health Security Agency, 61, Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5EQ, UK
- School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - Jeffrey Butler
- Geography Department, Applied Geoinformation Science Lab, Humboldt-University Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexandra Roth
- Local Health Department Berlin-Neukölln, Gesundheitsamt Neukölln, Blaschkoallee 32, 12359 Berlin, Germany
| | - Silke Feller
- Local Health Department Berlin-Neukölln, Gesundheitsamt Neukölln, Blaschkoallee 32, 12359 Berlin, Germany
| | - Nicolai Savaskan
- Local Health Department Berlin-Neukölln, Gesundheitsamt Neukölln, Blaschkoallee 32, 12359 Berlin, Germany
| | - Tobia Lakes
- Geography Department, Applied Geoinformation Science Lab, Humboldt-University Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany
- IRI THESys, Integrative Research Institute on Transformations of Human-Environment Systems, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
The spatio-temporal dynamics of an outbreak provide important insights to help direct public health resources intended to control transmission. They also provide a focus for detailed epidemiological studies and allow the timing and impact of interventions to be assessed.A common approach is to aggregate case data to administrative regions. Whilst providing a good visual impression of change over space, this method masks spatial variation and assumes that disease risk is constant across space. Risk factors for COVID-19 (e.g. population density, deprivation and ethnicity) vary from place to place across England so it follows that risk will also vary spatially. Kernel density estimation compares the spatial distribution of cases relative to the underlying population, unfettered by arbitrary geographical boundaries, to produce a continuous estimate of spatially varying risk.Using test results from healthcare settings in England (Pillar 1 of the UK Government testing strategy) and freely available methods and software, we estimated the spatial and spatio-temporal risk of COVID-19 infection across England for the first 6 months of 2020. Widespread transmission was underway when partial lockdown measures were introduced on 23 March 2020 and the greatest risk erred towards large urban areas. The rapid growth phase of the outbreak coincided with multiple introductions to England from the European mainland. The spatio-temporal risk was highly labile throughout.In terms of controlling transmission, the most important practical application of our results is the accurate identification of areas within regions that may require tailored intervention strategies. We recommend that this approach is absorbed into routine surveillance outputs in England. Further risk characterisation using widespread community testing (Pillar 2) data is needed as is the increased use of predictive spatial models at fine spatial scales.
Collapse
|