The histone H3.3 chaperone HIRA restrains erythroid-biased differentiation of adult hematopoietic stem cells

The many faces of H3.3 in regulating chromatin in embryonic stem cells and beyond

H3.3 is a highly conserved nonreplicative histone variant. H3.3 is enriched in promoters and enhancers of active genes, but it is also found within suppressed heterochromatin, mostly around telomeres. Accordingly, H3.3 is associated with seemingly contradicting functions: It is involved in development, differentiation, reprogramming, and cell fate, as well as in heterochromatin formation and maintenance, and the silencing of developmental genes. The emerging view is that different cellular contexts and histone modifications can promote opposing functions for H3.3. Here, we aim to provide an update with a focus on H3.3 functions in early mammalian development, considering the context of embryonic stem cell maintenance and differentiation, to finally conclude with emerging roles in cancer development and cell fate transition and maintenance.

HIRA vs. DAXX: the two axes shaping the histone H3.3 landscape

H3.3, the most common replacement variant for histone H3, has emerged as an important player in chromatin dynamics for controlling gene expression and genome integrity. While replicative variants H3.1 and H3.2 are primarily incorporated into nucleosomes during DNA synthesis, H3.3 is under the control of H3.3-specific histone chaperones for spatiotemporal incorporation throughout the cell cycle. Over the years, there has been progress in understanding the mechanisms by which H3.3 affects domain structure and function. Furthermore, H3.3 distribution and relative abundance profoundly impact cellular identity and plasticity during normal development and pathogenesis. Recurrent mutations in H3.3 and its chaperones have been identified in neoplastic transformation and developmental disorders, providing new insights into chromatin biology and disease. Here, we review recent findings emphasizing how two distinct histone chaperones, HIRA and DAXX, take part in the spatial and temporal distribution of H3.3 in different chromatin domains and ultimately achieve dynamic control of chromatin organization and function. Elucidating the H3.3 deposition pathways from the available histone pool will open new avenues for understanding the mechanisms by which H3.3 epigenetically regulates gene expression and its impact on cellular integrity and pathogenesis.

Independent and Complementary Functions of Caf1b and Hir1 for Chromatin Assembly in Tetrahymena thermophila

Histones and DNA associate to form the nucleosomes of eukaryotic chromatin. Chromatin assembly factor 1 (CAF-1) complex and histone regulatory protein A (HIRA) complex mediate replication-couple (RC) and replication-independent (RI) nucleosome assembly, respectively. CHAF1B and HIRA share a similar domain but play different roles in nucleosome assembly by binding to the different interactors. At present, there is limited understanding for the similarities and differences in their respective functions. Tetrahymena thermophila contains transcriptionally active polyploid macronuclei (MAC) and transcriptionally silent diploid micronuclei (MIC). Here, the distribution patterns of Caf1b and Hir1 exhibited both similarities and distinctions. Both proteins localized to the MAC and MIC during growth, and to the MIC during conjugation. However, Hir1 exhibited additional signaling on parental MAC and new MAC during sexual reproduction and displayed a punctate signal on developing anlagen. Caf1b and Hir1 only co-localized in the MIC with Pcna1 during conjugation. Knockdown of CAF1B impeded cellular growth and arrested sexual reproductive development. Loss of HIR1 led to MIC chromosome defects and aborted sexual development. Co-interference of CAF1B and HIR1 led to a more severe phenotype. Moreover, CAF1B knockdown led to the up-regulation of HIR1 expression, while knockdown of HIR1 also led to an increase in CAF1B expression. Furthermore, Caf1b and Hir1 interacted with different interactors. These results showed that CAF-1 and Hir1 have independent and complementary functions for chromatin assembly in T. thermophila.

The miR-221/222 cluster regulates hematopoietic stem cell quiescence and multipotency by suppressing both Fos/AP-1/IEG pathway activation and stress-like differentiation to granulocytes

Throughout life, hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), residing in bone marrow (BM), continuously regenerate erythroid/megakaryocytic, myeloid, and lymphoid cell lineages. This steady-state hematopoiesis from HSC and multipotent progenitors (MPPs) in BM can be perturbed by stress. The molecular controls of how stress can impact hematopoietic output remain poorly understood. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) as posttranscriptional regulators of gene expression have been found to control various functions in hematopoiesis. We find that the miR-221/222 cluster, which is expressed in HSC and in MPPs differentiating from them, perturbs steady-state hematopoiesis in ways comparable to stress. We compare pool sizes and single-cell transcriptomes of HSC and MPPs in unperturbed or stress-perturbed, miR-221/222-proficient or miR-221/222-deficient states. MiR-221/222 deficiency in hematopoietic cells was induced in C57BL/6J mice by conditional vav-cre-mediated deletion of the floxed miR-221/222 gene cluster. Social stress as well as miR-221/222 deficiency, alone or in combination, reduced HSC pools 3-fold and increased MPPs 1.5-fold. It also enhanced granulopoisis in the spleen. Furthermore, combined stress and miR-221/222 deficiency increased the erythroid/myeloid/granulocytic precursor pools in BM. Differential expression analyses of single-cell RNAseq transcriptomes of unperturbed and stressed, proficient HSC and MPPs detected more than 80 genes, selectively up-regulated in stressed cells, among them immediate early genes (IEGs). The same differential single-cell transcriptome analyses of unperturbed, miR-221/222-proficient with deficient HSC and MPPs identified Fos, Jun, JunB, Klf6, Nr4a1, Ier2, Zfp36-all IEGs-as well as CD74 and Ly6a as potential miRNA targets. Three of them, Klf6, Nr4a1, and Zfp36, have previously been found to influence myelogranulopoiesis. Together with increased levels of Jun, Fos forms increased amounts of the heterodimeric activator protein-1 (AP-1), which is known to control the expression of the selectively up-regulated expression of the IEGs. The comparisons of single-cell mRNA-deep sequencing analyses of socially stressed with miR-221/222-deficient HSC identify 5 of the 7 Fos/AP-1-controlled IEGs, Ier2, Jun, Junb, Klf6, and Zfp36, as common activators of HSC from quiescence. Combined with stress, miR-221/222 deficiency enhanced the Fos/AP-1/IEG pathway, extended it to MPPs, and increased the number of granulocyte precursors in BM, inducing selective up-regulation of genes encoding heat shock proteins Hspa5 and Hspa8, tubulin-cytoskeleton-organizing proteins Tuba1b, Tubb 4b and 5, and chromatin remodeling proteins H3f3b, H2afx, H2afz, and Hmgb2. Up-regulated in HSC, MPP1, and/or MPP2, they appear as potential regulators of stress-induced, miR-221/222-dependent increased granulocyte differentiation. Finally, stress by serial transplantations of miR-221/222-deficient HSC selectively exhausted their lymphoid differentiation capacities, while retaining their ability to home to BM and to differentiate to granulocytes. Thus, miR-221/222 maintains HSC quiescence and multipotency by suppressing Fos/AP-1/IEG-mediated activation and by suppressing enhanced stress-like differentiation to granulocytes. Since miR-221/222 is also expressed in human HSC, controlled induction of miR-221/222 in HSC should improve BM transplantations.

Histone Variants and Their Chaperones in Hematological Malignancies

Epigenetic regulation occurs on the level of compacting DNA into chromatin. The functional unit of chromatin is the nucleosome, which consists of DNA wrapped around a core of histone proteins. While canonical histone proteins are incorporated into chromatin through a replication-coupled process, structural variants of histones, commonly named histone variants, are deposited into chromatin in a replication-independent manner. Specific chaperones and chromatin remodelers mediate the locus-specific deposition of histone variants. Although histone variants comprise one of the least understood layers of epigenetic regulation, it has been proposed that they play an essential role in directly regulating gene expression in health and disease. Here, we review the emerging evidence suggesting that histone variants have a role at different stages of hematopoiesis, with a particular focus on the histone variants H2A, H3, and H1. Moreover, we discuss the current knowledge on how the dysregulation of histone variants can contribute to hematopoietic malignancies.

Transcription-coupled H3.3 recycling: A link with chromatin states

Histone variant H3.3 is incorporated into chromatin throughout the cell cycle and even in non-cycling cells. This histone variant marks actively transcribed chromatin regions with high nucleosome turnover, as well as silent pericentric and telomeric repetitive regions. In the past few years, significant progress has been made in our understanding of mechanisms involved in the transcription-coupled deposition of H3.3. Here we review how, during transcription, new H3.3 deposition intermingles with the fate of the old H3.3 variant and its recycling. First, we describe pathways enabling the incorporation of newly synthesized vs old H3.3 histones in the context of transcription. We then review the current knowledge concerning differences between these two H3.3 populations, focusing on their PTMs composition. Finally, we discuss the implications of H3.3 recycling for the maintenance of the transcriptional state and underline the emerging importance of H3.3 as a potent epigenetic regulator for both maintaining and switching a transcriptional state.

Bivalent Regulation and Related Mechanisms of H3K4/27/9me3 in Stem Cells

The "bivalent domain" is a unique histone modification region consisting of two histone tri-methylation modifications. Over the years, it has been revealed that the maintenance and dynamic changes of the bivalent domains play a vital regulatory role in the differentiation of various stem cell systems, as well as in other cells, such as immunomodulation. Tri-methylation modifications involved in the formation of the bivalent domains are interrelated and mutually regulated, thus regulating many life processes of cells. Tri-methylation of histone H3 at lysine 4 (H3K4me3), tri-methylation of histone H3 at lysine 9 (H3K9me3) and tri-methylation of histone H3 at lysine 27 (H3K27me3) are the main tri-methylation modifications involved in the formation of bivalent domains. The three form different bivalent domains in pairs. Furthermore, it is equally clear that H3K4me3 is a positive regulator of transcription and that H3K9me3/H3K27me3 are negative regulators. Enzymes related to the regulation of histone methylation play a significant role in the "homeostasis" and "breaking homeostasis" of the bivalent domains. Bivalent domains regulate target genes, upstream transcription, downstream targeting regulation and related cytokines during the establishment and breakdown of homeostasis, and exert the specific regulation of stem cells. Indeed, a unified mechanism to explain the bivalent modification in all stem cells has been difficult to define, and whether the bivalent modification is antagonistic in inducing the differentiation of homologous stem cells is controversial. In this review, we focus on the different bivalent modifications in several key stem cells and explore the main mechanisms and effects of these modifications involved. Finally, we discussed the close relationship between bivalent domains and immune cells, and put forward the prospect of the application of bivalent domains in the field of stem cells.