Nutrition Management of Geriatric Surgical Patients

Safety of craniotomy for brain tumor resection in octogenarians and older patients - a matched - cohort analysis

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of brain tumors has increased in elderly population overtime. Their eligibility to a major surgery remains a questionable subject. This study evaluated prognostic factors and 30-days morbidity and mortality in octogenarian population who underwent craniotomy for resection of brain tumor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 154 patients were divided into two different groups: patients above 80 years old and patients below 65 years old. In both groups, patients were stratified based on diagnosis with benign tumors [meningioma] and malignant tumors [high-grade gliomas and metastases]. Multivariable logistic regression model with backward elimination method was utilized to identify the independent risk factors for 30-days readmission and post-operative complications.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed no significant difference in 30-day readmission (p = 0.7329), 30-day mortality (0.6854) or in post-operative complication (p = 0.3291) between age ≥ 80 and age ≤ 65 groups. A longer length of stay (LOS) was observed in the older patients (p = 0.0479). There was a significant difference in the pre-post KPS between the two groups (p < 0.0001). ASA (p = 0.0315) and KPS (p = 0.071) were found as important prognostic factors associated with post-operative mortality in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Octogenarians can withstand craniotomy without any significant increase in 30-day readmission, 30-day mortality and post-operative complications as compared to patients younger than age 65. The ASA score (>3) and/or KPS (<70) were the most important prognostic factors for 30-days readmission and mortality.

The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index as a predictor of complications in geriatric trauma patients

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition is associated with increased morbidity and mortality after trauma. The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is a validated scoring system used to predict the risk of complications related to malnutrition in nontrauma patients. We hypothesized that GNRI is predictive of worse outcomes in geriatric trauma patients.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study of trauma patients 65 years or older admitted in 2019. Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index was calculated based on admission albumin level and ratio of actual body weight to ideal body weight. Groups were defined as major risk (GNRI <82), moderate risk (GNRI 82-91), low risk (GNRI 92-98), and no risk (GNRI >98). The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included ventilator days, intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, discharge home, sepsis, pneumonia, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the association between GNRI risk category and outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 513 patients were identified for analysis. Median age was 78 years (71-86 years); 24 patients (4.7%) were identified as major risk, 66 (12.9%) as moderate risk, 72 (14%) as low risk, and 351 (68.4%) as no risk. Injury Severity Scores and Charlson Comorbidity Indexes were similar between all groups. Patients in the no risk group had decreased rates of death, and after adjusting for Injury Severity Score, age, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, the no risk group had decreased odds of death (odds ratio, 0.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.41) compared with the major risk group. The no risk group also had fewer infectious complications including sepsis and pneumonia, and shorter hospital LOS and were more likely to be discharged home.

CONCLUSIONS

Major GNRI risk is associated with increased mortality and infectious complications in geriatric trauma patients. Further studies should target interventional strategies for those at highest risk based on GNRI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and Epidemiologic; Level III.

The Role of Nutritional Access in Malnourished Elderly Undergoing Major Surgery for Acute Abdomen: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

About 50% of the elderly undergoing emergency abdominal surgery are malnourished. The role of timely surgical nutritional access in this group of patients is unknown.

METHODS

We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample database from 2009 through the first three-quarters of 2015 of patients aged ≥65 years who were malnourished and underwent major abdominal surgery for the acute abdomen within the first 2 days of hospital admission.

RESULTS

Of 3 246 721 patients analyzed, 4311 patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, only 507 (11.8%) patients had surgical nutritional access (gastrostomy or jejunostomy) (group I), while 3804 patients (88.2%) did not (group II). In the propensity score-matched population, there were 482 patients in each group. The patients in group I had lower odds of mortality and postoperative gastrointestinal complications (paralytic ileus, anastomotic dehiscence, and intestinal fistulae) (P-value <.01, respectively).

DISCUSSION

Elderly who receive surgical nutritional access have lower rates of gastrointestinal complications and mortality.

Use of hand grip strength in nutrition risk screening of older patients admitted to general surgical wards

AIM

Hand grip strength (HGS) has been proposed as an indicator of nutritional status that is objective, requires minimal assessor training and is quick to administer, making it attractive for use in the acute setting. This study aimed to determine the discriminatory ability of impaired HGS to screen for malnutrition in an older hospital population and assess the added value of combining this with existing screening tools.

METHODS

Measures were undertaken during acute admission in patients ≥65 years admitted to general surgical wards. Impaired HGS was defined as a mean value below the lower limit of the 95% CI of population norms and observed HGS standardised as a percentage of this value. Nutritional risk was assessed using the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) and malnutrition defined as Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) rating B or C. Discriminatory ability of impaired HGS to identify malnourished patients was tested using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients (mean age: 74.0 (SD 6.7) years, 60% male) were recruited. Impaired HGS did not accurately identify malnutrition (AUC (95% CI): 0.41 (0.25-0.58), P < 0.001), nor did it improve discriminatory ability of the MST (AUC (95% CI), MST: 0.83 (0.71-0.95), P = 0.32; MST/HGS combined: 0.68 (0.51-0.86), P = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

HGS was not found to be suitable in screening older inpatients for malnutrition during admission to surgical wards. As such, screening for nutrition risk using an existing validated tool to identify patients for further in-depth nutritional assessment by an appropriately trained clinician remains the preferred method.

Perioperative Care of Elderly Surgical Outpatients

The ambulatory setting offers potential advantages for elderly patients undergoing elective surgery due to the advancement in both surgical and anesthetic techniques resulting in quicker recovery times, fewer complications, higher patient satisfaction, and reduced costs of care. This review article aims to provide a practical guide to anesthetic management of elderly outpatients. Important considerations in the preoperative evaluation of elderly outpatients with co-existing diseases, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of different anesthetic techniques on a procedural-specific basis, and recommendations regarding the management of common postoperative complications (e.g., pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting [PONV], delirium and cognitive dysfunction, and gastrointestinal dysfunction) are discussed. The role of anesthesiologists as perioperative physicians is important for optimizing surgical outcomes for elderly patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. The implementation of high-quality, evidence-based perioperative care programs for the elderly on an ambulatory basis has assumed increased importance. Optimal management of perioperative pain using opioid-sparing multimodal analgesic techniques and preventing PONV using prophylactic antiemetics are key elements for achieving enhanced recovery after surgery.

Is total lymphocyte count related to nutritional markers in hospitalized older adults?

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Older patients are commonly malnourished during hospital stay, and a high prevalence of malnutrition is found in hospitalized patients aged more than 65 years. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether total lymphocyte count is related to other nutritional markers in hospitalized older adults. METHODS Hospitalized older adults (N=131) were recruited for a cross-sectional study. Their nutritional status was assessed by the Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS), anthropometry, and total lymphocyte count. The statistical analyses included the chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and Mann-Whitney test. Spearman's linear correlation coefficient determined whether total lymphocyte count was correlated with the nutritional markers. Multiple linear regression determined the parameters associated with lymphocyte count. The significance level was set at 5%. RESULTS According to the NRS, 41.2% of the patients were at nutritional risk, and 36% had mild or moderate depletion according to total lymphocyte count. Total lymphocyte count was weakly correlated with mid-upper arm circumference (r=0.20507); triceps skinfold thickness (r=0.29036), and length of hospital stay (r= -0.21518). Total lymphocyte count in different NRS categories differed significantly: older adults who were not at nutritional risk had higher mean and median total lymphocyte count ( P =0.0245). Multiple regression analysis showed that higher lymphocyte counts were associated with higher triceps skinfold thicknesses and no nutritional risk according to the NRS. CONCLUSION Total lymphocyte count was correlated with mid-upper arm circumference, triceps skinfold thickness, and nutritional risk according to the NRS. In multiple regression the combined factors that remained associated with lymphocyte count were NRS and triceps skinfold thickness. Therefore, total lymphocyte count may be considered a nutritional marker. Other studies should confirm these findings.

Development of an Integrated Theory of Surgical Recovery in Older Adults

Experts argue the health care system is not prepared to meet the unique needs of older surgical patients, including how to provide the best care during the recovery phase. Nutrition plays a critical role in the recovery of surgical patients. Since older adults are at risk for malnutrition, examining the role of nutrition as a mediator for surgical recovery across the care continuum in older adults is critical. Presently there is a paucity of frameworks, models, and guidelines that integrate the role of nutrition on the trajectory of postoperative recovery in older surgical patients. The purpose of this article is to introduce the Integrated Theory of Surgical Recovery in Older Adults, an interdisciplinary middle-range theory, so that scholars, researchers, and clinicians can use this framework to promote recovery from surgery in older adults by considering the contribution of mediators of recovery (nutritional status, functional status, and frailty) unique to the older adults.

Determinants in treatment decision-making in older patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis

BACKGROUND

Three treatment options are available for patients with aortic stenosis: surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and medical treatment (MT). However, little is known about how Heart Team treatment decisions are made under routine conditions. The aim of this study was to identify the cardiac and geriatric components associated with treatment decision-making in older patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2013, 337 consecutive patients ≥75 years old referred for pre-operative evaluation in Nantes University Hospital had a comprehensive cardiac and geriatric assessment. In this observational retrospective study, relationships between treatment decision-making and cardiac or geriatric components were evaluated through multivariable models.

RESULTS

Surgical aortic valve replacement was proposed to 108 patients, TAVI to 131 and medical treatment to 98 patients. Mean age was 83±4 years and 51% were women. Geriatric components associated with treatment decision-making between SAVR vs. TAVI were age (p<0.001, OR=0.790), comorbidity score (p=0.027, OR=0.86), functional status (p<0.001, OR=1.46), and gait speed (p<0.001, OR=0.23). Cardiac components associated with decision-making between SAVR vs. TAVI were history of previous cardiac surgery (p<0.001, OR=0.09), left ventricular ejection fraction <50% (p<0.001, OR=0.14), coronary artery disease requiring revascularization (p=0.019, OR=0.4). Between TAVI vs. medical treatment, only history of previous cardiac surgery and presence of another severe valve disease were significant.

CONCLUSION

Comorbidities, functional status and physical performance, were significantly associated with the consensual treatment decision-making, independently of cardiac components in older patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis.

Pre-surgical Geriatric Syndromes, Frailty, and Risks for Postoperative Delirium in Older Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery: Prevalence and Red Flags

OBJECTIVE

We sought to identify and evaluate red flags for pre-surgical geriatric conditions (geriatric syndromes, frailty, and risks for postoperative delirium) in older patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.

METHODS

Older individuals (≥65 years) undergoing major elective gastrointestinal surgery from 2009 to 2012 were enrolled and assessed preoperatively.

RESULTS

Participants (N=379; mean age=74.5 ± 5.9 years) primarily underwent colorectal (54.3 %), gastric (21.9 %), and pancreatobiliary (12.6 %) surgery. Overall, 30.9 % had existing geriatric syndromes, 26.7 % were frail, and 22.8 % had >3 risk factors for postoperative delirium. The largest proportion (45.7 %) presented with at least one geriatric condition. Patients with or without geriatric conditions were discriminated with adequate sensitivity (67 %), specificity (84 %), and positive predictive value (77 %) by eight red flags: age ≥75 years (OR, 2.86; P<0.001), eating soft food (OR, 3.63; P=0.001), reported hypertension (OR, 2.8; P=0.001), weight loss >3 kg (OR, 4.79; P<0.001), fair-to-weak grip strength (OR, 2.53; P=0.001), sleeplessness (OR, 2.57; P=0.001), no-better-than-peer perceived health (OR, 1.88; P=0.022), and short-term inability to recall two of three common words (OR, 1.81; P=0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Eight red flags covered as part of history and physical examination are well suited to screen patients for geriatric conditions indicating the need for preoperative geriatric assessments and optimization.

Clinical conundrums and challenges during geriatric orthopedic emergency surgeries

Despite so many advancements and innovations in anesthetic techniques, expectations and challenges have also grown in plenty. Cardiac, pediatric, obstetric and neuro-anesthesia have perfectly developed to fulfill the desired needs of respective patient population. However, geriatric anesthesia has been shown a lesser interest in teaching and clinical practices over the years as compared with other anesthetic sub-specialties. The large growing geriatric population globally is also associated with an increase number of elderly patients presenting for orthopedic emergency surgeries. Orthopedic emergency surgery in geriatric population is not only a daunting clinical challenge but also has numerous socio-behavioral and economic ramifications. Decision making in anesthesia is largely influenced by the presence of co-morbidities, neuro-cognitive functions and the current socio-behavioral status. Pre-anesthetic evaluation and optimization are extremely important for a better surgical outcome but is limited by time constraints during emergency surgery. The current review aims to highlight comprehensively the various clinical, social, behavioral and psychological aspects during pre-anesthetic evaluation associated with emergency orthopedic surgery in geriatric population.

Nutrition and hydration in older adults in critical care

Nutrition and hydration are vital components of critical care nursing. However, meeting the nutrition and hydration needs of the critically ill older adult is often complex, because of preexisting risk factors (malnutrition, unintentional weight loss, frailty, and dehydration); as well as intensive care unit-related challenges (catabolism, eating and feeding, end-of-life care). This article highlights the challenges of managing nutrition and hydration in the critically ill older adult, reviews assessment principles, and offers strategies for optimizing nutrition and hydration.

Preoperative geriatric assessment: comprehensive, multidisciplinary and proactive

With the changing global demographic pattern, our health care systems increasingly have to deal with a greater number of elderly patients, which consequently also takes its toll on our surgical services. The elderly are not simply older adults. They represent a heterogeneous branch of the population with specific physiological, psychological, functional and social issues that require individualised attention prior to surgery. Increased acknowledgement that chronological age alone is not an exclusion criterion, along with advances in surgical and anaesthetic techniques have today lead to decreased reluctance to deny the elderly surgical treatment. In order to ensure a safe perioperative period, we believe that a comprehensive, multidisciplinary and proactive preoperative assessment will be helpful to detect the multiple risk factors and comorbidities common in older patients, to assess functional status and simultaneously allow room for early preoperative interventions and planning of the intra- and postoperative period. In this review we outline the currently available preoperative geriatric risk assessment tools and provide an insight on how a comprehensive, multidisciplinary and proactive approach can help improve perioperative outcome.