1
|
Tankel J, Safieddine N, Malthaner R, French D, Johnston B, Finley C, Darling G, Ferri L, Seely A, Gowing S. A trans-Canadian positive deviance seminar for paraesophageal hernia surgery: Reporting national postoperative outcomes and consensus recommendations. World J Surg 2024; 48:673-680. [PMID: 38358091 DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of adverse events (AEs) and length of stay (LOS) varies significantly following paraesophageal hernia surgery. We performed a Canadian multicenter positive deviance (PD) seminar to review individual center and national level data and establish holistic perioperative practice recommendations. METHODS A national virtual PD seminar was performed in October 2021. Recent best evidence focusing on AEs and LOS was presented. Subsequently, anonymized center-level AE and LOS data collected between 01/2017 and 01/2021 from a prospective, web-based database that tracks postoperative outcomes was presented. The top two performing centers with regards to these metrics were chosen and surgeons from these hospitals discussed elements of their treatment pathways that contributed to these outcomes. Consensus recommendations were then identified with participants independently rating their level of agreement. RESULTS Twenty-eight surgeons form 8 centers took part in the seminar across 5 Canadian provinces. Of the 680 included patients included, Clavien-Dindo grade I and II/III/IV/V complications occurred in 121/39/12/2 patients (17.8%/5.7%/1.8%/0.3%). Respiratory complications were the most common (effusion 12/680, 1.7% and pneumonia 9/680, 1.3%). Esophageal and gastric perforation occurred in 7 and 4/680, (1.0% and 0.6% respectively). Median LOS varied significantly between institutions (1 day, range 1-3 vs. 7 days, 3-8, p < 0.001). A strong level of agreement was achieved for 10/12 of the consensus statements generated. CONCLUSION PD seminars provide a supportive forum for centers to review best evidence and experience and generate recommendations based on expert opinion. Further research is ongoing to determine if this approach effectively accomplishes this objective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Tankel
- Division of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Najib Safieddine
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Michael Garron Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rick Malthaner
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London Health Sciences Center, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danny French
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital (Victoria Campus), Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Brian Johnston
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
| | - Christian Finley
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, St Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gail Darling
- Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Lorenzo Ferri
- Division of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Andrew Seely
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephen Gowing
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Health Sciences Center, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jones D, Gingrich M, Anstee C, Najmeh S, Safieddine N, Darling G, Malthaner R, Finley C, French DG, Ferri L, Seely A. Multicentre positive deviance seminar to generate best practice recommendations to reduce anastomotic leak and length of stay for patients undergoing oesophagectomy. BMJ Open Qual 2023; 12:e002458. [PMID: 38114245 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We describe a novel process using positive deviance (PD) with the Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons members, to identify perioperative best practice to minimise anastomotic leak (AL) and length of stay (LOS) following oesophagectomy. To our knowledge, this is the first National combination of level 1 evidence with expert opinion (ie, PD seminar) aimed at reducing AL and LOS in oesophageal surgery. Our primary hypothesis is that a multicentre National PD seminar is feasible, and could lead to the generation of best practices recommendations aimed at reducing AL and LOS in patients with oesophageal cancer. METHODS Adverse events, LOS and AL incidence/severity following oesophagectomy were prospectively collected from seven Canadian thoracic institutions using Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality classification system (2017-2020). Anonymised display of centre's data were presented, with identification of centres demonstrating PD. Surgeons from PD sites discussed principles of care, culminating in the consensus recommendations, anonymously rated by all (5-point Likert scale). RESULTS Data from 795 esophagectomies were included, with 25 surgeons participating. Two centres were identified as having the lowest AL rates 44/395 (11.1%) (vs five centres 71/400 (17.8%) (p<0.01)) and shortest LOS 8 days 45 (IQR: 6-14) (vs 10 days (IQR: 8-18) (p<0.001)). Recommendations included preoperative (prehabilitation, smoking cessation, chemotherapy for patients with dysphagia, minimise stents/feeding tubes), intraoperative (narrow gastric conduit, intrathoracic anastomosis, avoid routine jejunostomy, use small diameter closed-suction drains), postoperative day (POD) (early (POD 2-3) enteral feeding initiation, avoid routine barium swallow studies, early removal of tubes/drains (POD 2-3)). All ranked above 80% (4/5) in agreement to implement recommendations into their practice. CONCLUSION We report the feasibility of a National multicentre PD seminar with the generation of best practice recommendations aimed at reducing AL and LOS following oesophagectomy. Further research is required to demonstrate whether National PD seminars can be an effective quality improvement tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Jones
- Surgery, Thoracic, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Molly Gingrich
- Surgery, Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Caitlin Anstee
- Surgery, Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sara Najmeh
- Thoracic and Upper GI, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Najib Safieddine
- Thoracic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gail Darling
- Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | | | - Christian Finley
- Thoracic Surgery, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel G French
- Thoracic Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Lorenzo Ferri
- Thoracic and Upper GI, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Andrew Seely
- Surgery, Thoracic, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Odor PM, Bampoe S, Gilhooly D, Creagh-Brown B, Moonesinghe SR. Perioperative interventions for prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2020; 368:m540. [PMID: 32161042 PMCID: PMC7190038 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify, appraise, and synthesise the best available evidence on the efficacy of perioperative interventions to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in adult patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, CINHAL, and CENTRAL from January 1990 to December 2017. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials investigating short term, protocolised medical interventions conducted before, during, or after non-cardiac surgery were included. Trials with clinical diagnostic criteria for PPC outcomes were included. Studies of surgical technique or physiological or biochemical outcomes were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Reviewers independently identified studies, extracted data, and assessed the quality of evidence. Meta-analyses were conducted to calculate risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Quality of evidence was summarised in accordance with GRADE methods. The primary outcome was the incidence of PPCs. Secondary outcomes were respiratory infection, atelectasis, length of hospital stay, and mortality. Trial sequential analysis was used to investigate the reliability and conclusiveness of available evidence. Adverse effects of interventions were not measured or compared. RESULTS 117 trials enrolled 21 940 participants, investigating 11 categories of intervention. 95 randomised controlled trials enrolling 18 062 participants were included in meta-analysis; 22 trials were excluded from meta-analysis because the interventions were not sufficiently similar to be pooled. No high quality evidence was found for interventions to reduce the primary outcome (incidence of PPCs). Seven interventions had low or moderate quality evidence with confidence intervals indicating a probable reduction in PPCs: enhanced recovery pathways (risk ratio 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.21 to 0.58), prophylactic mucolytics (0.40, 0.23 to 0.67), postoperative continuous positive airway pressure ventilation (0.49, 0.24 to 0.99), lung protective intraoperative ventilation (0.52, 0.30 to 0.88), prophylactic respiratory physiotherapy (0.55, 0.32 to 0.93), epidural analgesia (0.77, 0.65 to 0.92), and goal directed haemodynamic therapy (0.87, 0.77 to 0.98). Moderate quality evidence showed no benefit for incentive spirometry in preventing PPCs. Trial sequential analysis adjustment confidently supported a relative risk reduction of 25% in PPCs for prophylactic respiratory physiotherapy, epidural analgesia, enhanced recovery pathways, and goal directed haemodynamic therapies. Insufficient data were available to support or refute equivalent relative risk reductions for other interventions. CONCLUSIONS Predominantly low quality evidence favours multiple perioperative PPC reduction strategies. Clinicians may choose to reassess their perioperative care pathways, but the results indicate that new trials with a low risk of bias are needed to obtain conclusive evidence of efficacy for many of these interventions. STUDY REGISTRATION Prospero CRD42016035662.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter M Odor
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Sohail Bampoe
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - David Gilhooly
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Benedict Creagh-Brown
- Surrey Perioperative Anaesthesia Critical care collaborative Research (SPACeR) Group, Intensive Care Unit, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - S Ramani Moonesinghe
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College Hospital, London, UK
- UCL/UCLH Surgical Outcomes Research Centre, UCL Centre for Perioperative Medicine, Research Department for Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Solomkin JS, Mazuski J, Blanchard JC, Itani KMF, Ricks P, Dellinger EP, Allen G, Kelz R, Reinke CE, Berríos-Torres SI. Introduction to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2017; 18:385-393. [PMID: 28541804 DOI: 10.1089/sur.2017.075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common type of health-care-associated infection (HAI) and adds considerably to the individual, social, and economic costs of surgical treatment. This document serves to introduce the updated Guideline for the Prevention of SSI from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). The Core section of the guideline addresses issues relevant to multiple surgical specialties and procedures. The second procedure-specific section focuses on a high-volume, high-burden procedure: Prosthetic joint arthroplasty. While many elements of the 1999 guideline remain current, others warrant updating to incorporate new knowledge and changes in the patient population, operative techniques, emerging pathogens, and guideline development methodology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph S Solomkin
- 1 Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma/Critical Care, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine , Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - John Mazuski
- 2 Section of Acute and Critical Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine , St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Joan C Blanchard
- 3 Association of periOperative Registered Nurses, Inc. , Denver, Colorado
| | | | - Philip Ricks
- 5 Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia
| | - E Patchen Dellinger
- 6 Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington
| | - George Allen
- 7 SUNY Downstate Medical Center and SUNY College of Health Related Professions , Brooklyn, New York
| | - Rachel Kelz
- 8 Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Caroline E Reinke
- 8 Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sandra I Berríos-Torres
- 5 Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Propofol Sedation Exacerbates Kidney Pathology and Dissemination of Bacteria during Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections. Infect Immun 2017; 85:IAI.00097-17. [PMID: 28461390 DOI: 10.1128/iai.00097-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2017] [Accepted: 04/13/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is responsible for large numbers of postsurgical nosocomial infections across the United States and worldwide. Propofol anesthesia is widely used in surgery and in intensive care units, and recent evidence indicates that even brief exposure to propofol can substantially increase host susceptibility to microbial infection. Here, we delineate the impact of propofol sedation on MRSA bloodstream infections in mice in the presence and absence of prophylactic antibiotic treatment. Consistent with previous reports, brief periods of anesthesia with propofol were sufficient to significantly increase bacterial burdens and kidney pathology in mice infected with MRSA. Propofol exposure increased neutrophilic infiltrates into the kidney and enhanced bacterial dissemination throughout kidney tissue. Propofol sedation reduced populations of effector phagocytes and mature dendritic cells within the kidney and led to the apparent expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cell-like populations. When propofol was coadministered with vancomycin prophylaxis, it dramatically increased kidney abscess formation and bacterial dissemination throughout kidney tissue at early times post-S. aureus infection compared to antibiotic-treated but nonsedated animals. Taken together, our data indicate that short-term sedation with propofol significantly increases the severity of bloodstream MRSA infection, even when administered in conjunction with vancomycin prophylaxis.
Collapse
|
6
|
Sway A, Solomkin JS, Pittet D, Kilpatrick C. Methodology and Background for the World Health Organization Global Guidelines on the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2017; 19:33-39. [PMID: 28472604 DOI: 10.1089/sur.2017.076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgical site infections remain an important topic of concern for surgeons in all specialties and are currently the focus of global health agencies for prevention. Because patients have numerous co-morbidities that increase the risks of surgical site infections, and because of the emergence of more resistant pathogens, it is necessary to revise and update guidelines to assist surgeons in the prevention of these infections. This article will summarize the most recent WHO Global Guidelines for the prevention of Surgical Site Infection that will have applicability for surgeons in all countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joseph S Solomkin
- 2 Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma/Critical Care, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine , Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Didier Pittet
- 3 Infection Control Programme and WHO Collaborating Centre on Patient Safety, The University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine , Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Claire Kilpatrick
- 4 WHO Service Delivery and Safety, Infection Prevention and Control Global Unit, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Martindale RG, McClave SA, Taylor B, Lawson CM. Perioperative nutrition: what is the current landscape? JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2014; 37:5S-20S. [PMID: 24009250 DOI: 10.1177/0148607113496821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Poor nutrition status has long been linked to increases in postoperative complications and adverse outcomes for the patient undergoing elective surgery. While optimal planning for nutrition therapy should be comprehensive spanning throughout the perioperative period, recent advances have focused on the concept of "prehabilitation" to best prepare the patient prior to the insult of surgery. Adding immune/metabolic modulating formulas the week of surgery with carbohydrate drinks to optimize glycogen deposition immediately prior to surgery, enhances patient recovery and return to baseline function. Such nutrition strategies should now be combined with a host of other practices (such as smoking cessation, weight loss, glucose control, and specialized exercise program) as part of a structured protocol to maximize patients' chances for a full and rapid recovery from their elective surgical procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert G Martindale
- Department of Surgery, University of Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Erem HH, Kiran RP, Remzi FH, Vogel JD. Venous thromboembolism in colorectal surgery: skip SCIP or comply? Tech Coloproctol 2014; 18:719-24. [PMID: 24562596 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-014-1129-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2013] [Accepted: 02/03/2014] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) includes recommendations for mechanical and pharmacologic venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after colorectal surgery. Compliance with these recommendations is publicly reported and included in current pay for performance plans. Presently, there is limited evidence to support compliance with these recommendations. AIM To determine the incidence of venous thromboembolic events in colorectal surgery patients who did or did not receive the recommended pharmacologic prophylaxis. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively accrued data from a single-center, tertiary care, colorectal surgery department. The main outcome measure was the occurrence of venous thromboembolic events and the need for blood transfusion after surgery. RESULTS Of 674 patients, 613(91%) received the recommended pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis and 61 (9%) did not. Diagnosis, patient variables, and type of surgery performed were similar in each group while operative time was increased in the compliant group (251 vs. 194 min, p < 0.05). In the compliant and noncompliant groups, the incidence of extremity deep venous thrombosis was 2.8 and 8.2% (p = 0.04), the incidence of pulmonary embolus 1.1 and 3.3% (p = 0.19), the incidence of portomesenteric venous thrombosis 2.6 and 4.9% (p = 0.38), and the incidence of any VTE 5.4 and 13.1% (p = 0.02), respectively. The use of perioperative red blood cell transfusions in the two groups was 9.1 and 14.8%, p = 0.17. In the subgroup analysis of open cases, there were no statistical differences in the occurrence of any type or combination of VTE. CONCLUSIONS Compliance with SCIP recommendations for pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis decreased the incidence of VTE after colorectal surgery with no increase in the use of perioperative transfusion. Colorectal surgeons who elect to skip these recommendations may jeopardize both the reputational score and financial reimbursement of their hospital and may put their patients at unnecessary risk for a preventable postoperative complication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H H Erem
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
|
10
|
An Analysis of Methodologies That Can Be Used to Validate if a Perioperative Surgical Home Improves the Patient-centeredness, Evidence-based Practice, Quality, Safety, and Value of Patient Care. Anesthesiology 2013; 119:1261-74. [DOI: 10.1097/aln.0b013e3182a8e9e6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Approximately 80 million inpatient and outpatient surgeries are performed annually in the United States. Widely variable and fragmented perioperative care exposes these surgical patients to lapses in expected standard of care, increases the chance for operational mistakes and accidents, results in unnecessary and potentially detrimental care, needlessly drives up costs, and adversely affects the patient healthcare experience. The American Society of Anesthesiologists and other stakeholders have proposed a more comprehensive model of perioperative care, the Perioperative Surgical Home (PSH), to improve current care of surgical patients and to meet the future demands of increased volume, quality standards, and patient-centered care. To justify implementation of this new healthcare delivery model to surgical colleagues, administrators, and patients and maintain the integrity of evidenced-based practice, the nascent PSH model must be rigorously evaluated. This special article proposes comparative effectiveness research aims or objectives and an optimal study design for the novel PSH model.
Collapse
|