Teamwork and Surgical Team-Based Training

Observational Study About the Impact of Simulation Training of Non-Technical Skills on Teamwork: Towards a Paradigm Shift in Undergraduate Medical Training

INTRODUCTION

Recently, simulation as an educational method has gained increasing importance in Medicine. However, medical education has favored the acquisition of individual knowledge and skills, while overlooking the development of teamwork skills. Since most errors in clinical practice are due to human factors, i.e., non-technical skills, the aim of this study was to assess the impact that training in a simulation environment has on teamwork in an undergraduate setting.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study took place in a simulation center, with a study population of 23 participants, fifth year undergraduate students, randomly divided into teams of four elements. Twenty simulated scenarios of teamwork in the initial assessment and resuscitation of critically ill trauma patients were recorded. Video recordings were made at three distinct learning moments (before training, end of the semester, and six months after the last training), and a blinded evaluation was performed by two independent observers, who applied the Trauma Team Performance Observation Tool (TPOT). Additionally, the Team STEPPS Teamwork Attitudes Questionnaire (T-TAQ) was applied to the study population before and after the training to assess any change in individual attitudes towards non-technical skills. A 5% (or 0.05) significance level was considered for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

With a moderate level of inter-observer agreement (Kappa = 0.52, p = 0.002), there was a statistically significant improvement in the team's overall approach, evidenced by the TPOT scores (median of 4.23, 4.35 and 4.50, in the three time-points assessed, respectively, p = 0.003). In the T-TAQ, there was an improvement in non-technical skills, that was statistically significant for "Mutual Support" (median from 2.50 to 3.00, p = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

In this study, incorporating non-technical skills education and training in undergraduate medical education was associated with sustained improvement in team performance in the approach to the simulated trauma patient. Consideration should be given to introducing non-technical skills training and teamwork in the emergency setting during undergraduate training.

Simulation for diversity, equity and inclusion in emergency medicine residency training: A qualitative study

Background

The last few years have seen an increased focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives across organizations. Simulation has been used in varying degrees for teaching about DEI topics with emergency medicine; however, there are no established best practices or guidelines on this subject. To further examine the use of simulation for DEI teachings, the DEISIM work group was created as a collaboration between the Society of Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Simulation Academy and the Academy for Diversity and Inclusion in Emergency Medicine (ADIEM). This study represents their findings.

Method

This qualitative study was conducted using a three-pronged approach. Initial literature search was conducted followed by a call for submission of simulation curricula. These were then followed by five focus groups. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed by a professional transcription service, and then subjected to thematic analysis.

Results

Data were analyzed and organized into four broad categories including Learners, Facilitators, Organizational/Leadership, and Technical Issues. Challenges within each of these were identified, as were potential solutions. Select pertinent findings included focused faculty development, a carefully planned approach that utilized DEI content experts and the use of simulation for workplace microaggressions or discriminations.

Conclusions

There appears to be a clear role for simulation in DEI teachings. Such curricula, however, should be undertaken with careful planning and input from appropriate and representative parties. More research is needed on optimizing and standardizing simulation-based DEI curricula.

Operating Room Performance Optimization Metrics: a Systematic Review

Literature proposes numerous initiatives for optimization of the Operating Room (OR). Despite multiple suggested strategies for the optimization of workflow on the OR, its patients and (medical) staff, no uniform description of 'optimization' has been adopted. This makes it difficult to evaluate the proposed optimization strategies. In particular, the metrics used to quantify OR performance are diverse so that assessing the impact of suggested approaches is complex or even impossible. To secure a higher implementation success rate of optimisation strategies in practice we believe OR optimisation and its quantification should be further investigated. We aim to provide an inventory of the metrics and methods used to optimise the OR by the means of a structured literature study. We observe that several aspects of OR performance are unaddressed in literature, and no studies account for possible interactions between metrics of quality and efficiency. We conclude that a systems approach is needed to align metrics across different elements of OR performance, and that the wellbeing of healthcare professionals is underrepresented in current optimisation approaches.

Simulation-Based Education of Endovascular Scrub Nurses Reduces Stress and Improves Team Performance

INTRODUCTION

Endovascular procedures have become commonplace in vascular surgery. This development calls for new training strategies for future specialists. Most simulation-based education (SBE) programs have a monodisciplinary focus on physicians, although successful surgery is a multidisciplinary team effort. Mental stress impairs the learning process and surgical performance and heart rate variability (HRV) can be measured as a proxy for both mental and physical stress. This study aims to assess how SBE of endovascular scrub nurses affects team performance and HRV during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective interventional study in which EVAR-inexperienced scrub nurses followed a focused SBE EVAR program. During real-life EVAR procedures, HRV was continuously recorded with a wireless electrocardiogram patch and multidisciplinary team performance was assessed with the Imperial College Error CAPture (ICECAP) tool, before and after the SBE program, allowing each scrub nurse to serve as their own control. Eight scrub nurses with experience in lower limb endovascular procedures, but not EVAR, were invited to participate.

RESULTS

Seven participants completed the study. In five of seven scrub nurses, HRV-derived stress levels during real-time EVAR procedures were lower after SBE compared to before SBE. Mean HRV increased from 24 msec to 35 msec (P < 0.001), indicating stress level reduction. Before SBE, the mean number of errors/hour was 7.3 (standard deviation ± 1.8) compared to 3.6 (standard deviation ± 2.7) after SBE. Most errors were categorized as technical (58 %) and communicative (23 %).

CONCLUSIONS

SBE of scrub nurses may improve team performance and may lower mental stress during EVAR procedures. In this small study, we suggest using mental stress, as evaluated with HRV, and multidisciplinary team performance, as evaluated with ICECAP, to assess SBE effectiveness in real-case EVAR procedures. This SBE program and live ICECAP observations and electrocardiogram patches was well-accepted by scrub nurses and the entire team.

Rates of Adverse Events in Hospitalized Patients After Summer-Time Resident Changeover in the United States: Is There a July Effect?

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine whether patients in teaching hospitals are at higher risk of suffering from an adverse event during the summer trainee changeover period.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of data from the Medicare Patient Safety Monitoring System, a medical-record abstraction-based database in the United States. Hospital admissions from 2010 to 2017 for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, pneumonia, or a major surgical procedure were studied. Admissions were divided into nonsurgical (acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, or pneumonia) and surgical. Adverse event rates in July/August were compared with the rest of the year. Hospitals were stratified into major teaching, minor teaching, or nonteaching. Results were adjusted for patient demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. Outcomes were the adjusted odds of having at least 1 adverse event in July/August versus the rest of the year.

RESULTS

We included 185,652 hospital admissions. The adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of suffering from at least one adverse event in a major teaching hospital in July/August was 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-0.98) for nonsurgical patients and 1.09 (95% CI, 0.84-1.40) for surgical patients. In minor teaching hospitals, the adjusted ORs were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.88-1.04) for nonsurgical patients and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.87-1.12) for surgical patients. In nonteaching hospitals, the adjusted ORs were 0.98 (95% CI, 0.91-1.06) for nonsurgical patients and 1.10 (95% CI, 0.96-1.24) for surgical patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients admitted to teaching hospitals in July/August are not at increased risk of adverse events. These findings should reassure patients and medical educators that patients are not excessively endangered by admission to the hospital during these months.