1
|
van Nieuwenhuizen KE, Both IGIA, Porte PJ, van der Eijk AC, Jansen FW. Environmental sustainability and gynaecological surgery: Which factors influence behaviour? An interview study. BJOG 2024; 131:716-724. [PMID: 37973607 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the various factors that influence environmentally sustainable behaviour in gynaecological surgery and examine the differences between gynaecologists and residents. DESIGN An interview study. SETTING Academic and non-academic hospitals in the Netherlands. POPULATION Gynaecologists (n = 10) and residents (n = 6). METHODS Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews to determine the various factors that influence environmentally sustainable behaviour in gynaecological surgery and to examine the differences between gynaecologists and residents. By using the Desmond framework and the COM-B BCW, both organisational and individual factors related to behaviour were considered. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Factors that influence environmentally sustainable behaviour. RESULTS Awareness is increasing but practical knowledge is insufficient. It is crucial to integrate education on the environmental impact of everyday decisions for residents and gynaecologists. Gynaecologists make their own choices but residents' autonomy is limited. There is the necessity to provide environmentally sustainable surgical equipment without compromising other standards. There is a need for a societal change that encourages safe and open communication about environmental sustainability. To transition to environmentally sustainable practices, leadership, time, collaboration with the industry and supportive regulatory changes are essential. CONCLUSION This study lays the groundwork for promoting more environmentally sustainable behaviour in gynaecological surgery. The key recommendations, addressing hospital regulations, leadership, policy revisions, collaboration with the industry, guideline development and education, offer practical steps towards a more sustainable healthcare system. Encouraging environmentally sustainable practices should be embraced to enhance the well-being of both our planet and our population, driving us closer to a more environmentally sustainable future in healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ingena G I A Both
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Petra J Porte
- Department Health Services Management & Organisation, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne C van der Eijk
- Operating Room Department and Central Sterile Supply Department, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Willem Jansen
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Nieuwenhuizen KE, Friedericy HJ, van der Linden S, Jansen FW, van der Eijk AC. User experience of wearing comfort of reusable versus disposable surgical gowns and environmental perspectives: A cross-sectional survey. BJOG 2024; 131:709-715. [PMID: 37806784 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the user experience of wearing comfort of reusable sterile surgical gowns and compare these gowns with conventional disposable surgical gowns. DESIGN Cross-sectional survey. SETTING An academic hospital in the Netherlands. POPULATION Gynaecologists, surgeons, residents and operating room assistants (n=80). METHODS Quantitative and qualitative data were obtained via a written questionnaire. Participants provided subjective comments and scored the reusable gown on each individual topic with a score from 1 to 5 (1 = unsatisfactory, 2 = moderate, 3 = good, 4 = very good, 5 = excellent) and compared the reusable gown with the conventional disposable alternative (better, equal or worse). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Wearing comfort: ventilation and temperature regulation, fit and length, functionality, barrier function and ease of use. RESULTS The results of the overall scores of the reusable gown are scored as 'very good' (mean 4.3, SD ± 0.5) by its users. Regarding comparison of the gowns, more than 79% (lowest score 79%, highest score 95%) of the participants scored the reusable gown equal or higher on six of seven topics. The topic 'ease of use' was scored equal or higher by 59% of the participants. Subjective comments provided information on possible improvements. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study demonstrate that there is professional acceptance regarding the utilisation of reusable surgical gowns. To facilitate broader adoption, it is imperative to foster collaboration among suppliers and healthcare institutions. The reusable surgical gown is an environmentally sustainable, safe and comfortable alternative in the operating room.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hans J Friedericy
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sjaak van der Linden
- Operating Room Department and Central Sterile Supply Department, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Willem Jansen
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Bio Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Anne C van der Eijk
- Operating Room Department and Central Sterile Supply Department, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Bio Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
de Koning R, Blikkendaal MD, de Sousa Lopes SMC, van der Meeren LE, Cheng H, Jansen FW, Lashley EELO. Histological analysis of (antral) follicle density in ovarian cortex tissue attached to stripped endometriomas. J Assist Reprod Genet 2024; 41:1067-1076. [PMID: 38438769 PMCID: PMC11052973 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03058-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE When resecting endometriomas with the stripping technique, in the majority of cases, a thin line of adjacent ovarian cortex is attached to the endometrioma. In this study, we performed histological analysis to determine (antral) follicle density in the ovarian cortex tissue attached to stripped endometriomas and assessed patient- and surgical characteristics that could affect this. METHODS Histological slides of previously removed endometriomas were assessed. Follicles in the attached ovarian tissue were classified according to maturation, and follicular density was determined. Immunofluorescent staining of antral follicles in a subset of endometriomas was also performed. RESULTS In 90 out of 96 included endometriomas (93.7%), ovarian tissue attached to the cyst wall was observed. One thousand nine hundred forty-four follicles at different maturation stages were identified (3 follicles/mm3). Follicle density was negatively associated with age (p < 0.001). Antral follicles (< 7-mm diameter) were present in the ovarian tissue attached to 35 endometriomas (36.5%) derived from younger patients compared to endometriomas where none were detected (30 versus 35 years, p = 0.003). Antral follicle density was 1 follicle/mm3. Based on immunofluorescence, healthy antral follicles were identified in two out of four examined endometriomas. CONCLUSIONS Ovarian tissue attached to stripped endometriomas holds potential as a non-invasive source for antral follicles. In theory, application of IVM could be an interesting alternative FP option in young patients with endometriomas who undergo cystectomy in order to transform the surgical collateral damage to a potential oocyte source. Our results encourage future research with fresh tissue to further assess the quality and potential of these follicles. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: B21.055 (METC LDD), date of registration 12-08-2021, retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rozemarijn de Koning
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- Endometriose Centrum, Haaglanden Medical Centre, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
- Nederlandse Endometriose Kliniek, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands.
| | - Mathijs D Blikkendaal
- Endometriose Centrum, Haaglanden Medical Centre, Den Haag, The Netherlands
- Nederlandse Endometriose Kliniek, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lotte E van der Meeren
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hui Cheng
- Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Willem Jansen
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Eileen E L O Lashley
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Koning R, Cantineau AEP, van der Tuuk K, De Bie B, Groen H, van den Akker-van Marle ME, Nap AW, Maas JWM, Jansen FW, Twijnstra ARH, Blikkendaal MD. The (cost-) effectiveness Of Surgical excision of Colorectal endometriosis compared to ART treatment trAjectory (TOSCA study) - a study protocol. Reprod Fertil 2024:RAF-23-0048. [PMID: 38583465 DOI: 10.1530/raf-23-0048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Currently, the optimal treatment to increase the chance of pregnancy and live birth in patients with colorectal endometriosis and subfertility is unknown. Evidence suggests that that both surgery and in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) are effective in improving live birth rate (LBR) among these women. However, the available evidence is of low quality, reports highly heterogeneous results, lacks direct comparison between both treatment options and does not assess whether a combination strategy results in a higher LBR compared to IVF/ICSI-only treatment. Additionally, the optimal timing of surgery within the treatment trajectory remains unclear. The primary objective of the TOSCA study is to assess the effectiveness of surgical treatment (potentially combined with IVF/ICSI) compared to IVF/ICSI-only treatment to increase the chance of an ongoing pregnancy resulting in a live birth in patients with colorectal endometriosis and subfertility, measured by cumulative LBR. Secondary objectives are to assess and compare quality of life and cost-effectiveness in both groups. Patients will be followed for 40 months after inclusion or until live birth. The TOSCA study is expected to be completed in 6 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Astrid E P Cantineau
- A Cantineau, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Karin van der Tuuk
- K van der Tuuk, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Bianca De Bie
- B De Bie, Endometriosis Foundation of the Netherlands, Sittard, Netherlands
| | - Henk Groen
- H Groen, Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | - Annemiek W Nap
- A Nap, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Jacques W M Maas
- J Maas, Department of Gynaecology and Grow-school of Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Frank Willem Jansen
- F Jansen, Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Andries R H Twijnstra
- A Twijnstra, Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Mathijs D Blikkendaal
- M Blikkendaal, Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2300 RC, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Friedericy HJ, Friedericy AF, de Weger A, van Dorp ELA, Traversari RAAL, van der Eijk AC, Jansen FW. Effect of unidirectional airflow ventilation on surgical site infection in cardiac surgery: environmental impact as a factor in the choice for turbulent mixed air flow. J Hosp Infect 2024; 148:51-57. [PMID: 38537748 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical site infection (SSI) in the form of postoperative deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) after cardiac surgery is a rare, but potentially fatal, complication. In addressing this, the focus is on preventive measures, as most risk factors for SSI are not controllable. Therefore, operating rooms are equipped with heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems to prevent airborne contamination of the wound, either through turbulent mixed air flow (TMA) or unidirectional air flow (UDAF). AIM To investigate if the risk for SSI after cardiac surgery was decreased after changing from TMA to UDAF. METHODS This observational retrospective single-centre cohort study collected data from 1288 patients who underwent open heart surgery over 2 years. During the two study periods, institutional SSI preventive measures remained the same, with the exception of the type of HVAC system that was used. FINDINGS Using multi-variable logistic regression analysis that considered confounding factors (diabetes, obesity, duration of surgery, and re-operation), the hypothesis that TMA is an independent risk factor for SSI was rejected (odds ratio 0.9, 95% confidence interval 0.4-1.8; P>0.05). It was not possible to demonstrate the preventive effect of UDAF on the incidence of SSI in patients undergoing open heart surgery when compared with TMA. CONCLUSION Based on these results, the use of UDAF in open heart surgery should be weighed against its low cost-effectiveness and negative environmental impact due to high electricity consumption. Reducing energy overuse by utilizing TMA for cardiac surgery can diminish the carbon footprint of operating rooms, and their contribution to climate-related health hazards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H J Friedericy
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - A F Friedericy
- Department of Health Sciences, Free University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A de Weger
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - E L A van Dorp
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - A C van der Eijk
- Operating Room Department and Central Sterile Supply Department, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - F W Jansen
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands; Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tummers FHMP, Peltenburg SI, Metzemaekers J, Jansen FW, Blikkendaal MD. Evaluation of the effect of previous endometriosis surgery on clinical and surgical outcomes of subsequent endometriosis surgery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2023; 308:1531-1541. [PMID: 37639036 PMCID: PMC10520192 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07193-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients often undergo repeat surgery for endometriosis, due to recurrent or residual disease. Previous surgery is often considered a risk factor for worse surgical outcome. However, data are scarce concerning the influence of subsequent endometriosis surgery. METHODS A retrospective study in a centre of expertise for endometriosis was conducted. All endometriosis subtypes and intra-operative steps were included. Detailed information regarding surgical history of patients was collected. Surgical time, intra-operative steps and major post-operative complications were obtained as outcome measures. RESULTS 595 patients were included, of which 45.9% had previous endometriosis surgery. 7.9% had major post-operative complications and 4.4% intra-operative complications. The patient journey showed a median of 3 years between previous endometriosis surgeries. Each previous therapeutic laparotomic surgery resulted on average in 13 additional minutes (p = 0.013) of surgical time. Additionally, it resulted in more frequent performance of adhesiolysis (OR 2.96, p < 0.001) and in a higher risk for intra-operative complications (OR 1.81, p = 0.045), however no higher risk for major post-operative complications (OR 1.29, p = 0.418). Previous therapeutic laparoscopic endometriosis surgery, laparotomic and laparoscopic non-endometriosis surgery showed no association with surgical outcomes. Regardless of previous surgery, disc and segmental bowel resection showed a higher risk for major post-operative complications (OR 3.64, p = 0.017 respectively OR 3.50, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Previous therapeutic laparotomic endometriosis surgery shows an association with longer surgical time, the need to perform adhesiolysis, and more intra-operative complications in the subsequent surgery for endometriosis. However, in a centre of expertise with experienced surgeons, no increased risk of major post-operative complications was observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sophie I Peltenburg
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Metzemaekers
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Willem Jansen
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Mathijs D Blikkendaal
- Endometriosis Center, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
- Nederlandse Endometriose Kliniek, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tummers FHMP, Bazelmans MK, Jansen FW, Blikkendaal MD, Vahrmeijer AL, Kuppen PJK. Biomarker identification for endometriosis as a target for real-time intraoperative fluorescent imaging: A new approach using transcriptomic analysis to broaden the search for potential biomarkers. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2023; 288:114-123. [PMID: 37506597 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
Intra-operative fluorescent imaging of endometriosis could help to optimize surgical treatment. Potential biomarkers to use as target for endometriosis-binding fluorescent probes were identified using a new five-phase transcriptomics-based approach to broaden the search for biomarkers. Using publicly available datasets, a differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis was performed for endometriosis versus surgically relevant surrounding tissue (peritoneum, bladder, sigmoid, rectum, transverse colon, small intestine, vagina, and fallopian tubes) for which data was available. The remaining relevant surrounding tissues were analyzed for low expression levels. DEGs with a predicted membranous or extracellular location and with low expression levels in surrounding tissue were identified as candidate targets. Modified Target Selection Criteria were used to rank candidate targets based on the highest potential for use in fluorescent imaging. 29 potential biomarkers were ranked, resulting in Folate receptor 1 as the most potential biomarker. This is a first step towards finding a fluorescent tracer for intra-operative visualization of endometriosis. Additionally, this approach, using transcriptomics analysis to identifying candidate targets for a specific type of tissue for use in fluorescence-guided surgery could be translated to other surgical fields. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: A new approach using transcriptomics analysis is shown to identify candidate targets for intra-operative fluorescent imaging for endometriosis, resulting in 29 potential candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fokkedien H M P Tummers
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Maria K Bazelmans
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Willem Jansen
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Mathijs D Blikkendaal
- Nederlandse Endometriose Kliniek, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, 2625 AD Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander L Vahrmeijer
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Peter J K Kuppen
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Metzemaekers J, Bouwman L, de Vos M, van Nieuwenhuizen K, Twijnstra ARH, Smeets M, Jansen FW, Blikkendaal M. Clavien-Dindo, comprehensive complication index and classification of intraoperative adverse events: a uniform and holistic approach in adverse event registration for (deep) endometriosis surgery. Hum Reprod Open 2023; 2023:hoad019. [PMID: 37250430 PMCID: PMC10224795 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoad019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2023] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What is the additional value of the comprehensive complication index (CCI) and ClassIntra system (classification for intraoperative adverse events (ioAEs)) in adverse event (AE) reporting in (deep) endometriosis (DE) surgery compared to only using the Clavien-Dindo (CD) system? SUMMARY ANSWER The CCI and ClassIntra are useful additional tools alongside the CD system for a complete and uniform overview of the total AE burden in patients with extensive surgery (such as DE), and with this uniform data registration, it is possible to provide greater insight into the quality of care. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Uniform comparison of AEs reported in the literature is hampered by scattered registration. In endometriosis surgery, the usage of the CD complication system and the CCI is internationally recommended; however, the CCI is not routinely adapted in endometriosis care and research. Furthermore, a recommendation for ioAEs registration in endometriosis surgery is lacking, although this is vital information in surgical quality assessments. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION A prospective mono-center study was conducted with 870 surgical DE cases from a non-university DE expertise center between February 2019 and December 2021. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS Endometriosis cases were collected with the EQUSUM system, a publicly available web-based application for registration of surgical procedures for endometriosis. Postoperative adverse events (poAEs) were classified with the CD complication system and CCI. Differences in reporting and classifying AEs between the CCI and the CD were assessed. ioAEs were assessed with the ClassIntra. The primary outcome measure was to assess the additional value toward the CD classification with the introduction of the CCI and ClassIntra. In addition, we report a benchmark for the CCI in DE surgery. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE A total of 870 DE procedures were registered, of which 145 procedures with one or more poAEs, resulting in a poAE rate of 16.7% (145/870), of which in 36 cases (4.1%), the poAE was classified as severe (≥Grade 3b). The median CCI (interquartile range) of patients with poAEs was 20.9 (20.9-31.7) and 33.7 (33.7-39.7) in the group of patients with severe poAEs. In 20 patients (13.8%), the CCI was higher than the CD because of multiple poAEs. There were 11 ioAEs reported (11/870, 1.3%) in all procedures, mostly minor and directly repaired serosa injuries. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION This study was conducted at a single center; thus, trends in AE rates and type of AEs could differ from other centers. Furthermore, no conclusion could be drawn on ioAEs in relation to the postoperative course because the power of this database is not robust enough for that purpose. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS From our data, we would advise to use the Clavien-Dindo classification system together with the CCI and ClassIntra for a complete overview of AE registration. The CCI appeared to provide a more complete overview of the total burden of poAEs compared to only reporting the most severe poAEs (as with CD). If the use of the CD, CCI, and ClassIntra is widely adapted, uniform data comparison will be possible at (inter)national level, providing better insight into the quality of care. Our data could be used as a first benchmark for other DE centers to optimize information provision in the shared decision-making process. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS No funding was received for this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeroen Metzemaekers
- Department of Gynecology/Endometriosis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lotte Bouwman
- Department of Gynecology/Endometriosis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marit de Vos
- Department of Gynecology/Endometriosis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Kim van Nieuwenhuizen
- Department of Gynecology/Endometriosis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Andries R H Twijnstra
- Department of Gynecology/Endometriosis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Maddy Smeets
- Department of Gynecology/Endometriosis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Willem Jansen
- Department of Gynecology/Endometriosis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Mathijs Blikkendaal
- Correspondence address. Department of Gynecology/Endometriosis, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
de Koning R, Zwart G, Dahan A, Jansen FW, Blikkendaal M, Twijnstra A. Esketamine in the treatment of chronic endometriosis-induced pain: a case report. Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders 2023. [DOI: 10.1177/22840265231153518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: The pathophysiology of endometriosis-induced pain is complex and current pain management is often inadequate. As a consequence, the quality of life of endometriosis patients is reduced due to persistent and often recurrent severe pain, affecting emotional well-being. Case description: In this case report, we present a 28-year-old patient with deep endometriosis and severe pain resistant to conventional therapy, who experienced, after an 8-h infusion with esketamine, no pain symptoms for 8 weeks. Discussion: Current treatment options to suppress chronic pain symptoms in patients with (deep) endometriosis are often inadequate. Esketamine targets key components of the condition (inflammation, pain, depression), but the use of this drug in the treatment of chronic pain due to endometriosis has not been reported yet. Future trials are necessary to assess the effect of esketamine in the treatment of chronic pain due to endometriosis. Conclusion: This case report highlights the potential of esketamine infusion therapy in the treatment of endometriosis patients with persistent pain despite conventional therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rozemarijn de Koning
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Endometriosis in Balance Expertise Center, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Gertjan Zwart
- Department of Anesthesiology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Albert Dahan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Willem Jansen
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mathijs Blikkendaal
- Endometriosis in Balance Expertise Center, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Andries Twijnstra
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schouten AM, Flipse SM, van Nieuwenhuizen KE, Jansen FW, van der Eijk AC, van den Dobbelsteen JJ. Operating Room Performance Optimization Metrics: a Systematic Review. J Med Syst 2023; 47:19. [PMID: 36738376 PMCID: PMC9899172 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-023-01912-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Literature proposes numerous initiatives for optimization of the Operating Room (OR). Despite multiple suggested strategies for the optimization of workflow on the OR, its patients and (medical) staff, no uniform description of 'optimization' has been adopted. This makes it difficult to evaluate the proposed optimization strategies. In particular, the metrics used to quantify OR performance are diverse so that assessing the impact of suggested approaches is complex or even impossible. To secure a higher implementation success rate of optimisation strategies in practice we believe OR optimisation and its quantification should be further investigated. We aim to provide an inventory of the metrics and methods used to optimise the OR by the means of a structured literature study. We observe that several aspects of OR performance are unaddressed in literature, and no studies account for possible interactions between metrics of quality and efficiency. We conclude that a systems approach is needed to align metrics across different elements of OR performance, and that the wellbeing of healthcare professionals is underrepresented in current optimisation approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne M Schouten
- Biomedical Engineering Department, Technical University of Delft, Mekelweg 5, 2628 CD, Delft, the Netherlands.
| | - Steven M Flipse
- Science Education and Communication Department, Technical University of Delft, Mekelweg 5, 2628 CD, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Kim E van Nieuwenhuizen
- Gynecology Department, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Frank Willem Jansen
- Biomedical Engineering Department, Technical University of Delft, Mekelweg 5, 2628 CD, Delft, the Netherlands
- Gynecology Department, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Anne C van der Eijk
- Operation Room Centre, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - John J van den Dobbelsteen
- Biomedical Engineering Department, Technical University of Delft, Mekelweg 5, 2628 CD, Delft, the Netherlands
- Gynecology Department, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rasenberg D, Ramaekers M, Jacobs I, Pluyter J, Geurts L, Nederend J, de Hingh I, Bonsing B, Vahrmeijer A, van der Harst E, Dulk MD, van Dam R, Koerkamp BG, Surgery Group AUMC, Riele WT, Reinhard R, Jansen FW, Dankelman J, Mieog S, Luyer M. Computer-aided decision support and 3D modelling in pancreatic cancer surgery. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.11.625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
|
12
|
van de Berg NJ, van den Dobbelsteen JJ, Jansen FW, Grimbergen CA, Dankelman J. Correction to: Energetic soft-tissue treatment technologies: an overview of procedural fundamentals and safety factors. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:5546. [PMID: 35477808 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09298-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- N J van de Berg
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 3mE, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands.
| | - J J van den Dobbelsteen
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 3mE, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - F W Jansen
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 3mE, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands.,Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C A Grimbergen
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 3mE, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands.,Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Dankelman
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 3mE, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Metzemaekers J, van den Akker-van Marle ME, Sampat J, Smeets MJGH, English J, Thijs E, Maas JWM, Willem Jansen F, Essers B. Treatment preferences for medication or surgery in patients with deep endometriosis and bowel involvement - a discrete choice experiment. BJOG 2021; 129:1376-1385. [PMID: 34889037 PMCID: PMC9302663 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Objective To study the preferences of women with deep endometriosis (DE) with bowel involvement when they have to choose between conservative (medication) or surgical treatment. Design Labelled discrete choice experiment (DCE). Setting Dutch academic and non‐academic hospitals and online recruitment. Population or Sample A total of 169 women diagnosed with DE of the bowel. Methods Baseline characteristics and the fear of surgery were collected. Women were asked to rank attributes and choose between hypothetical conservative or surgical treatment in different choice sets (scenarios). Each choice set offered different levels of all treatment attributes. Data were analysed by using multinomial logistic regression. Main Outcome Measures The following attributes – effect on/risk of pain, fatigue, pregnancy, endometriosis lesions, mood swings, osteoporosis, temporary stoma and permanent intestinal symptoms – were used in this DCE. Results In the ranking, osteoporosis was ranked with low importance, whereas in the DCE, a lower chance of osteoporosis was one of the most important drivers when choosing a conservative treatment. Women with previous surgery showed less fear of surgery compared with women without surgery. Low anterior resection syndrome was almost equally important for patients as the chance of pain reduction. Pain reduction had higher importance than improving fertility chances, even in women with desire for a future child. Conclusions The risk of developing low anterior resection syndrome as a result of treatment is almost equally important as the reduction of pain symptoms. Women with previous surgery experience less fear of surgery compared with women without a surgical history. Tweetable Abstract First discrete choice experiment in patients with deep endometriosis. First discrete choice experiment in patients with deep endometriosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeroen Metzemaekers
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - M Elske van den Akker-van Marle
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jonathan Sampat
- Department of Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - James English
- Department of Gynaecology, Haaglanden Medisch Centrum, Den Haag, the Netherlands
| | - Elke Thijs
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jacques W M Maas
- Department of Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Frank Willem Jansen
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Brigitte Essers
- Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tummers FHMP, Hoebink J, Driessen SRC, Jansen FW, Twijnstra ARH. Decline in surgeon volume after successful implementation of advanced laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: An undesired side effect? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2021; 100:2082-2090. [PMID: 34490608 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The implementation of advanced minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques has broadened. An extensive body of literature shows that high hospital and surgeon volumes lead to better patient outcomes. However, no information is available regarding volume trends in the post-implementation phase of MIS. This study investigated these trends and poses suggestions to adjust these developments. This knowledge can provide guidance to optimize patient safe performance of new surgical techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS A national retrospective cohort study in the Netherlands. The number of advanced laparoscopic (level 3 and 4) and robotic procedures and the number of gynecologists performing them were collected through a web-based questionnaire to determine hospital and gynecological surgeon volume. These volumes were compared with our previously collected data from 2012. RESULTS The response rate was 85%. Hospitals produced larger volumes for advanced laparoscopic and robotic procedures. However, still 63% of the hospitals perform low-volume level 4 laparoscopic procedures. Additionally, gynecological surgeon volumes appeared to decrease for level 3 procedures, as the group of gynecologists performing fewer than 20 procedures expanded (64% vs. 44% in 2012), with 15% of the gynecologists performing fewer than ten procedures. Despite an increase in surgeon volumes for level 4 laparoscopy and robotic surgery, volumes continued to be low, as still 49% of gynecologists performed fewer than 10 level 4 procedures per year and 41% performed fewer than 20 robotic procedures per year. CONCLUSIONS The broad implementation of advanced MIS procedures resulted in an increasing number of these procedures with increasing hospital volumes. However, as a side-effect, a disproportionate rise in number of gynecologists performing these procedures was observed. Therefore, surgeon volumes remain low and even decreased for some procedures. Centralization of complex procedures and training of specialized MIS gynecologists could improve surgeon volumes and therefore consequently enhance patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jasmin Hoebink
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sara R C Driessen
- Department of Gynecology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Willem Jansen
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Bio Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tummers FH, Huizinga CR, van Pampus MG, Stockmann HB, Cohen AF, van der Bogt KE, van der Bogt KE, Stockmann HB, Cohen AF, van Pampus MG, Moll E, van Oort C, Jansen FW, Hellebrekers BW. Assessment of fitness to perform using a validated self-test in obstetric and gynecological night shifts in the Netherlands. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 224:617.e1-617.e14. [PMID: 33515515 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The field of obstetrics and gynecology requires complex decision-making and skills because of unexpected high-risk situations. These skills are influenced by alertness, reaction time, and concentration. Night shifts result in sleep deprivation, which might impair these functions, although it is still unclear to what extent. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate whether a night shift routinely impairs the obstetrics and gynecology consultants' and residents' fitness to perform and whether this reaches a critical limit compared with relevant frames of reference. STUDY DESIGN Residents (n=33) and consultants (n=46) in obstetrics and gynecology conducted multiple measurements (n=415) at precall, postcall, and noncall moments with the fitness to perform self-test. The self-test consists of an adaptive pursuit tracking task that is able to objectively measure alertness, reaction time, concentration, and hand-eye coordination and Visual Analog Scale tests to subjectively score alertness. The test is validated with a sociolegal reference of a 0.06% ethanol blood concentration (the peak level after 2 units of alcohol, the legal driving limit). This equals -1.37% on the objective score and -8.17 points on subjective alertness. Linear mixed models were used to analyze the difference within subjects over a night shift, integrating repeated measures over time. RESULTS The overnight objective difference between postcall and precall measurements was -0.62 (P<.05) for residents and 0.28 (P=NS) for consultants, both not exceeding the sociolegal reference as a group. Objective impairment exceeded the reference for 31% of the residents and 28% of the consultants. Subjective alertness decreased in residents (-18.26; P<.001) and consultants (-10.85; P<.001), both exceeding the reference. No residents had to continue work postcall versus 7.8% of the consultants. None of the consultants that had to continue work were in an objective critically impaired state. CONCLUSION This study provides insight and awareness of individual performance after night shifts with clear frames of reference. The performance of residents is negatively and significantly affected by night shifts; therefore, a scheduled day off after a night shift is justified. Consultants showed no overall impairment; however, a quarter did exceed the alcohol limit reference after their night shift. If not logistically feasible to schedule a protected day off after a night shift, our group recommends safe shift scheduling, including options to transfer care after a demanding night shift to prevent working in a compromised state.
Collapse
|
16
|
Rikken JFW, Kowalik CR, Emanuel MH, Bongers MY, Spinder T, Jansen FW, Mulders AGMGJ, Padmehr R, Clark TJ, van Vliet HA, Stephenson MD, van der Veen F, Mol BWJ, van Wely M, Goddijn M. Septum resection versus expectant management in women with a septate uterus: an international multicentre open-label randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2021; 36:1260-1267. [PMID: 33793794 PMCID: PMC8058590 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Does septum resection improve reproductive outcomes in women with a septate uterus? SUMMARY ANSWER Hysteroscopic septum resection does not improve reproductive outcomes in women with a septate uterus. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY A septate uterus is a congenital uterine anomaly. Women with a septate uterus are at increased risk of subfertility, pregnancy loss and preterm birth. Hysteroscopic resection of a septum may improve the chance of a live birth in affected women, but this has never been evaluated in randomized clinical trials. We assessed whether septum resection improves reproductive outcomes in women with a septate uterus, wanting to become pregnant. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION We performed an international, multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial in 10 centres in The Netherlands, UK, USA and Iran between October 2010 and September 2018. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Women with a septate uterus and a history of subfertility, pregnancy loss or preterm birth were randomly allocated to septum resection or expectant management. The primary outcome was conception leading to live birth within 12 months after randomization, defined as the birth of a living foetus beyond 24 weeks of gestational age. We analysed the data on an intention-to-treat basis and calculated relative risks with 95% CI. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE We randomly assigned 80 women with a septate uterus to septum resection (n = 40) or expectant management (n = 40). We excluded one woman who underwent septum resection from the intention-to-treat analysis, because she withdrew informed consent for the study shortly after randomization. Live birth occurred in 12 of 39 women allocated to septum resection (31%) and in 14 of 40 women allocated to expectant management (35%) (relative risk (RR) 0.88 (95% CI 0.47 to 1.65)). There was one uterine perforation which occurred during surgery (1/39 = 2.6%). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Although this was a major international trial, the sample size was still limited and recruitment took a long period. Since surgical techniques did not fundamentally change over time, we consider the latter of limited clinical significance. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The trial generated high-level evidence in addition to evidence from a recently published large cohort study. Both studies unequivocally do not reveal any improvements in reproductive outcomes, thereby questioning any rationale behind surgery. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) There was no study funding. M.H.E. reports a patent on a surgical endoscopic cutting device and process for the removal of tissue from a body cavity licensed to Medtronic, outside the scope of the submitted work. H.A.v.V. reports personal fees from Medtronic, outside the submitted work. B.W.J.M. reports grants from NHMRC, personal fees from ObsEva, personal fees from Merck Merck KGaA, personal fees from Guerbet, personal fees from iGenomix, outside the submitted work. M.G. reports several research and educational grants from Guerbet, Merck and Ferring (location VUMC) outside the scope of the submitted work. The remaining authors have nothing to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Dutch trial registry: NTR 1676. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE 18 February 2009. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT 20 October 2010.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J F W Rikken
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C R Kowalik
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M H Emanuel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M Y Bongers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - T Spinder
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leeuwarden Medical Centre, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - F W Jansen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Leiden, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - A G M G J Mulders
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R Padmehr
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Avicenna Research Institute, Tehran, Iran
| | - T J Clark
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - H A van Vliet
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - M D Stephenson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - F van der Veen
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B W J Mol
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - M van Wely
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Goddijn
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tummers FH, Draaisma WA, Demirkiran A, Brouwer TA, Lagerveld BW, van Schrojenstein Lantman ES, Spijkers K, Coppus SF, Jansen FW. Potential Risk and Safety Measures in Laparoscopy in COVID-19 Positive Patients. Surg Innov 2021; 29:73-79. [PMID: 33788655 PMCID: PMC8948368 DOI: 10.1177/15533506211003527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background. During the COVID-19 pandemic the question arises if laparoscopy, as an aerosol forming procedure, poses a potential risk for viral transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to healthcare workers. Methods. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase and MEDLINE. Articles reporting information regarding COVID-19 or other relevant viruses and laparoscopy, surgical smoke, aerosols and viral transmission were included. Results. Although aerosols produced during laparoscopy do not originate from the respiratory tract, the main transmission route of SARS-CoV-2, research did show SARS-CoV-2 to be present in other body fluids. The transmission risk via this route is however considered very low. As previous research showed potential viral transmission during laparoscopy for viruses that spread through contaminated body fluids, there might be a potential risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission during laparoscopy, albeit considered very small. Conclusion. Due to the small risk compared to widely known benefits of laparoscopy, there is no reason to replace laparoscopy by laparotomy due to COVID-19 infection. To avoid the potential small risk of viral transmission, additional safety measures are advised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fokkedien Hmp Tummers
- Department of Gynecology, 4501Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Werner A Draaisma
- Department of Surgery, 10233Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - Ahmet Demirkiran
- Department of Surgery, 26094Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands
| | - Tammo A Brouwer
- Department of Anesthesiology, 4480Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Sjors Fpj Coppus
- Department of Gynecology, 8185Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven/Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Willem Jansen
- Department of Gynecology, 4501Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Bio Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Metzemaekers J, Lust E, Rhemrev J, Van Geloven N, Twijnstra A, Van Der Westerlaken L, Jansen FW. Prognosis in fertilisation rate and outcome in IVF cycles in patients with and without endometriosis: a population-based comparative cohort study with controls. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2021; 13:27-34. [PMID: 33889858 PMCID: PMC8051192 DOI: 10.52054/fvvo.13.1.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Subfertility occurs in 30-40% of endometriosis patients. Regarding the fertilisation rate with in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and endometriosis, conflicting data has been published. This study aimed to compare endometriosis patients to non-endometriosis cycles assessing fertilisation rates in IVF. Methods: A population-based cohort study was conducted at the Leiden University Medical Center. IVF cycles of endometriosis patients and controls (unexplained infertility and tubal pathology) were analysed. The main outcome measurement was fertilisation rate. Results: 503 IVF cycles in total, 191 in the endometriosis group and 312 in the control. The mean fertilisation rate after IVF did not differ between both groups, 64.1%±25.5 versus 63.9%±24.8 (p=0.95) respectively, independent of age and r-ASRM classification. The median number of retrieved oocytes was lower in the endometriosis group (7.0 versus 8.0 respectively, p=0.19) and showed a significant difference when corrected for age (p=0.02). When divided into age groups, the statistical effect was only seen in the group of ≤ 35 years (p=0.04). In the age group ≤35, the endometriosis group also showed significantly more surgery on the internal reproductive organs compared to the control group (p<0.001). All other outcomes did not show significant differences. Conclusion: Similar fertilisation rates were found in endometriosis IVF cycles compared to controls. The oocyte retrieval was lower in the endometriosis group, however this effect was only significant in the age group ≤ 35 years. All other secondary outcomes did not show significant differences. In general, endometriosis patients with an IVF indication can be counselled positively regarding the chances of becoming pregnant, and do not need a different IVF approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Metzemaekers
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Eer Lust
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jpt Rhemrev
- Department of Gynaecology, Haaglanden Medisch Centrum-Bronovo, Den Haag, the Netherlands
| | - N Van Geloven
- Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Arh Twijnstra
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - L Van Der Westerlaken
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - F W Jansen
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Metzemaekers J, Haazebroek P, Smeets MJGH, English J, Blikkendaal MD, Twijnstra ARH, Adamson GD, Keckstein J, Jansen FW. EQUSUM: Endometriosis QUality and grading instrument for SUrgical performance: proof of concept study for automatic digital registration and classification scoring for r-ASRM, EFI and Enzian. Hum Reprod Open 2020; 2020:hoaa053. [PMID: 33409380 PMCID: PMC7772248 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2020] [Revised: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Is electronic digital classification/staging of endometriosis by the EQUSUM application more accurate in calculating the scores/stages and is it easier to use compared to non-digital classification? SUMMARY ANSWER We developed the first digital visual classification system in endometriosis (EQUSUM). This merges the three currently most frequently used separate endometriosis classification/scoring systems (i.e. revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine (rASRM), Enzian and Endometriosis Fertility Index (EFI)) to allow uniform and adequate classification and registration, which is easy to use. The EQUSUM showed significant improvement in correctly classifying/scoring endometriosis and is more user-friendly compared to non-digital classification. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Endometriosis classification is complex and until better classification systems are developed and validated, ideally all women with endometriosis undergoing surgery should have a correct rASRM score and stage, while women with deep endometriosis (DE) should have an Enzian classification and if there is a fertility wish, the EFI score should be calculated. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION A prospective endometriosis classification proof of concept study under experts in deep endometriosis was conducted. A comparison was made between currently used non-digital classification formats for endometriosis versus a newly developed digital classification application (EQUSUM). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS A hypothetical operative endometriosis case was created and summarized in both non-digital and digital form. During European endometriosis expert meetings, 45 DE experts were randomly assigned to the classic group versus the digital group to provide a proper classification of this DE case. Each expert was asked to provide the rASRM score and stage, Enzian and EFI score. Twenty classic forms and 20 digital forms were analysed. Questions about the user-friendliness (system usability scale (SUS) and subjective mental effort questionnaire (SMEQ)) of both systems were collected. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The rASRM stage was scored completely correctly by 10% of the experts in the classic group compared to 75% in the EQUSUM group (P < 0. 01). The rASRM numerical score was calculated correctly by none of the experts in the classic group compared with 70% in the EQUSUM group (P < 0.01). The Enzian score was correct in 60% of the classic group compared to 90% in the EQUSUM group (P = 0.03). EFI scores were calculated correctly in 25% of the classic group versus 85% in the EQUSUM group (P < 0.01). Finally, the usability measured with the SUS was significantly better in the EQUSUM group compared to the classic group: 80.8 ± 11.4 and 61.3 ± 20.5 (P < 0.01). Also the mental effort measured with the SMEQ was significant lower in the EQUSUM group compared to the classic group: 52.1 ± 18.7 and 71.0 ± 29.1 (P = 0.04). Future research should further develop and confirm these initial findings by conducting similar studies with larger study groups, to limit the possible role of chance. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION These first results are promising, however it is important to note that this is a preliminary result of experts in DE and needs further testing in daily practice with different types (complex and easy) of endometriosis cases and less experienced gynaecologists in endometriosis surgery. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This is the first time that the rASRM, Enzian and EFI are combined in one web-based application to simplify correct and automatic endometriosis classification/scoring and surgical registration through infographics. Collection of standardized data with the EQUSUM could improve endometriosis reporting and increase the uniformity of scientific output. However, this requires a broad implementation. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS To launch the EQUSUM application, a one-time financial support was provided by Medtronic to cover the implementation cost. No competing interests were declared. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Metzemaekers
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - P Haazebroek
- Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - M J G H Smeets
- Department of Gynaecology, Haaglanden Medisch Centrum-Bronovo, Den Haag, the Netherlands
| | - J English
- Department of Gynaecology, Haaglanden Medisch Centrum-Bronovo, Den Haag, the Netherlands
| | - M D Blikkendaal
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - A R H Twijnstra
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - J Keckstein
- Stiftung Endometrioseforschung (SEF), Westerstede,Germany
- Gynecological Clinic Drs. Keckstein, Villach, Austria
| | - F W Jansen
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Metzemaekers J, Slotboom S, Sampat J, Vermolen P, Smeets MJGH, Elske van den Akker-van Marle M, Maas J, Bakker EC, Nijkamp M, Both S, Jansen FW. Crossroad decisions in deep endometriosis treatment options: a qualitative study among patients. Fertil Steril 2020; 115:702-714. [PMID: 33070963 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.06.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Revised: 06/06/2020] [Accepted: 06/20/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the experiences, considerations, and motivations of patients with endometriosis in the decision-making process for deep endometriosis (DE) treatment options. DESIGN Qualitative study using semi-structured in-depth focus group methodology. SETTING University medical center. PATIENT(S) A total of 19 Dutch women diagnosed with DE between 27 and 47 years of age. INTERVENTION(S) Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Focus group topics were disease impact and motives for treatment, expectations of the treatment process, and important factors in the decision process. RESULT(S) Women reported that pain, fertility, and strong fear of complications are important decisive factors in the treatment process. The goal of conceiving a child is considered important, however, sometimes doctors emphasize this topic too much. It emerged that complication counseling is frequently about surgical complications, whereas side effects of hormonal treatments are neglected. Shared decision making and information about treatment options, complications, and side effects are not always optimal, making it difficult to make a well-considered choice. Despite negative experiences encountered after surgery, the positive effect of surgery ensures that most women do not regret their choice. CONCLUSION(S) In the treatment decision process for patients with DE, pain is almost always the most important decisive factor. The wish to conceive and strong fear of complications can change this choice. Doctors should understand the importance of fertility for the majority of women, but, also, if this is not considered paramount, respect that view. To improve shared decision making, exploration of treatment goals, training of healthcare providers, and better patient information provision are desirable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeroen Metzemaekers
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Suzanne Slotboom
- Department of Applied Psychology, University of Applied Sciences, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jonathan Sampat
- Department of Gynecology, Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Polo Vermolen
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - M Elske van den Akker-van Marle
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jacques Maas
- Department of Gynecology, Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Esther C Bakker
- Department of Psychology, Open University, Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | - Marjan Nijkamp
- Department of Psychology, Open University, Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | - Stephanie Both
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Frank Willem Jansen
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rikken JFW, Verhorstert KWJ, Emanuel MH, Bongers MY, Spinder T, Kuchenbecker W, Jansen FW, van der Steeg JW, Janssen CAH, Kapiteijn K, Schols WA, Torrenga B, Torrance HL, Verhoeve HR, Huirne JAF, Hoek A, Nieboer TE, van Rooij IAJ, Clark TJ, Robinson L, Stephenson MD, Mol BWJ, van der Veen F, van Wely M, Goddijn M. Septum resection in women with a septate uterus: a cohort study. Hum Reprod 2020; 35:1578-1588. [PMID: 32353142 PMCID: PMC7368397 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Revised: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Does septum resection improve reproductive outcomes in women with a septate uterus? SUMMARY ANSWER In women with a septate uterus, septum resection does not increase live birth rate nor does it decrease the rates of pregnancy loss or preterm birth, compared with expectant management. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The septate uterus is the most common uterine anomaly with an estimated prevalence of 0.2-2.3% in women of reproductive age, depending on the classification system. The definition of the septate uterus has been a long-lasting and ongoing subject of debate, and currently two classification systems are used worldwide. Women with a septate uterus may be at increased risk of subfertility, pregnancy loss, preterm birth and foetal malpresentation. Based on low quality evidence, current guidelines recommend removal of the intrauterine septum or, more cautiously, state that the procedure should be evaluated in future studies. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION We performed an international multicentre cohort study in which we identified women mainly retrospectively by searching in electronic patient files, medical records and databases within the time frame of January 2000 until August 2018. Searching of the databases, files and records took place between January 2016 and July 2018. By doing so, we collected data on 257 women with a septate uterus in 21 centres in the Netherlands, USA and UK. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS We included women with a septate uterus, defined by the treating physician, according to the classification system at that time. The women were ascertained among those with a history of subfertility, pregnancy loss, preterm birth or foetal malpresentation or during a routine diagnostic procedure. Allocation to septum resection or expectant management was dependent on the reproductive history and severity of the disease. We excluded women who did not have a wish to conceive at time of diagnosis. The primary outcome was live birth. Secondary outcomes included pregnancy loss, preterm birth and foetal malpresentation. All conceptions during follow-up were registered but for the comparative analyses, only the first live birth or ongoing pregnancy was included. To evaluate differences in live birth and ongoing pregnancy, we used Cox proportional regression to calculate hazard rates (HRs) and 95% CI. To evaluate differences in pregnancy loss, preterm birth and foetal malpresentation, we used logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% CI. We adjusted all reproductive outcomes for possible confounders. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE In total, 257 women were included in the cohort. Of these, 151 women underwent a septum resection and 106 women had expectant management. The median follow-up time was 46 months. During this time, live birth occurred in 80 women following a septum resection (53.0%) compared to 76 women following expectant management (71.7%) (HR 0.71 95% CI 0.49-1.02) and ongoing pregnancy occurred in 89 women who underwent septum resection (58.9%), compared to 80 women who had expectant management (75.5%) (HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.52-1.06)). Pregnancy loss occurred in 51 women who underwent septum resection (46.8%) versus 31 women who had expectant management (34.4%) (OR 1.58 (0.81-3.09)), while preterm birth occurred in 26 women who underwent septum resection (29.2%) versus 13 women who had expectant management (16.7%) (OR 1.26 (95% CI 0.52-3.04)) and foetal malpresentation occurred in 17 women who underwent septum resection (19.1%) versus 27 women who had expectant management (34.6%) (OR 0.56 (95% CI 0.24-1.33)). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Our retrospective study has a less robust design compared with a randomized controlled trial. Over the years, the ideas about the definition of the septate uterus has changed, but since the 257 women with a septate uterus included in this study had been diagnosed by their treating physician according to the leading classification system at that time, the data of this study reflect the daily practice of recent decades. Despite correcting for the most relevant patient characteristics, our estimates might not be free of residual confounding. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our results suggest that septum resection, a procedure that is widely offered and associated with financial costs for society, healthcare systems or individuals, does not lead to improved reproductive outcomes compared to expectant management for women with a septate uterus. The results of this study need to be confirmed in randomized clinical trials. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) A travel for JFWR to Chicago was supported by the Jo Kolk Studyfund. Otherwise, no specific funding was received for this study. The Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre, Groningen, received an unrestricted educational grant from Ferring Pharmaceutical Company unrelated to the present study. BWM reports grants from NHMRC, personal fees from ObsEva, personal fees from Merck, personal fees from Guerbet, other payment from Guerbet and grants from Merck, outside the submitted work. The other authors declare no conficts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J F W Rikken
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location AMC and VUMC, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - K W J Verhorstert
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location AMC and VUMC, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M H Emanuel
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M Y Bongers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maxima Medical Centre, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - T Spinder
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leeuwarden Medical Centre, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - W Kuchenbecker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Isala Hospital Zwolle, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - F W Jansen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Leiden, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - J W van der Steeg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, the Netherlands
| | - C A H Janssen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, the Netherlands
| | - K Kapiteijn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - W A Schols
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - B Torrenga
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H L Torrance
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - H R Verhoeve
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, OLVG Oost, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J A F Huirne
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location AMC and VUMC, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A Hoek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - T E Nieboer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - I A J van Rooij
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Elisabeth Hospital Tweesteden, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - T J Clark
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - L Robinson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - M D Stephenson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Illinois, CA, USA
| | - B W J Mol
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - F van der Veen
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location AMC and VUMC, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M van Wely
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location AMC and VUMC, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Goddijn
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location AMC and VUMC, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rikken JFW, Verhorstert KWJ, Emanuel MH, Bongers MY, Spinder T, Kuchenbecker WKH, Jansen FW, van der Steeg JW, Janssen CAH, Kapiteijn K, Schols WA, Torrenga B, Torrance HL, Verhoeve HR, Huirne JAF, Hoek A, Nieboer TE, van Rooij IAJ, Clark TJ, Robinson L, Stephenson MD, Mol BWJ, van der Veen F, van Wely M, Goddijn M. Corrigendum. Septum resection in women with a septate uterus: a cohort study. Hum Reprod 2020; 35:1722. [PMID: 32472131 PMCID: PMC7368394 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Revised: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- J F W Rikken
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location AMC and VUMC, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - K W J Verhorstert
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location AMC and VUMC, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M H Emanuel
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - M Y Bongers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maxima Medical Centre, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - T Spinder
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leeuwarden Medical Centre, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - W K H Kuchenbecker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Isala Hospital Zwolle, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - F W Jansen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Leiden, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - J W van der Steeg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, the Netherlands
| | - C A H Janssen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, the Netherlands
| | - K Kapiteijn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - W A Schols
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - B Torrenga
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H L Torrance
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - H R Verhoeve
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, OLVG Oost, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J A F Huirne
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location AMC and VUMC, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A Hoek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - T E Nieboer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - I A J van Rooij
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Elisabeth Hospital Tweesteden, Tilburg, the NetherNetherlandslands
| | - T J Clark
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - L Robinson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - M D Stephenson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Illinois, CA, USA
| | - B W J Mol
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - F van der Veen
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location AMC and VUMC, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M van Wely
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location AMC and VUMC, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Goddijn
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location AMC and VUMC, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
van Barneveld E, Veth VB, Sampat JM, Schreurs AMF, van Wely M, Bosmans JE, de Bie B, Jansen FW, Klinkert ER, Nap AW, Mol BWJ, Bongers MY, Mijatovic V, Maas JWM. SOMA-trial: surgery or medication for women with an endometrioma? Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial and cohort study. Hum Reprod Open 2020; 2020:hoz046. [PMID: 33033754 PMCID: PMC7528444 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoz046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Revised: 10/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTIONS The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment of women suffering from pain due to an ovarian endometrioma when compared to treatment with medication (analgesia and/or hormones). The primary outcome is defined as successful pain reduction (-30% reduction of pain) measured by the numeric rating scale (NRS) after 6 months. Secondary outcomes include successful pain reduction after 12 and 18 months, quality of life, affective symptoms, cost-effectiveness, recurrence rate, need of adjuvant medication after surgery, ovarian reserve, adjuvant surgery and budget impact. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Evidence suggests that both medication and surgical treatment of an ovarian endometrioma are effective in reducing pain and improving quality of life. However, there are no randomised studies that compare surgery to treatment with medication. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION This study will be performed in a research network of university and teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. A multicentre randomised controlled trial and parallel prospective cohort study in patients with an ovarian endometrioma, with the exclusion of patients with deep endometriosis, will be conducted. After obtaining informed consent, eligible patients will be randomly allocated to either treatment arm (medication or surgery) by using web-based block randomisation stratified per centre. A successful pain reduction is set at a 30% decrease on the NRS at 6 months after randomisation. Based on a power of 80% and an alpha of 5% and using a continuity correction, a sample size of 69 patients in each treatment arm is needed. Accounting for a drop-out rate of 25% (i.e. loss to follow up), we need to include 92 patients in each treatment arm, i.e. 184 in total. Simultaneously, a cohort study will be performed for eligible patients who are not willing to be randomised because of a distinct preference for one of the two treatment arms. We intend to include 100 women in each treatment arm to enable standardization by inverse probability weighting, which means 200 patients in total. The expected inclusion period is 24 months with a follow-up of 18 months. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS Premenopausal women (age ≥ 18 years) with pain (dysmenorrhoea, pelvic pain or dyspareunia) and an ovarian endometrioma (cyst diameter ≥ 3 cm) who visit the outpatient clinic will make up the study population. Patients with signs of deep endometriosis will be excluded. The primary outcome is successful pain reduction, which is defined as a 30% decrease of pain on the NRS at 6 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include successful pain reduction after 12 and 18 months, quality of life and affective symptoms, cost-effectiveness (from a healthcare and societal perspective), number of participants needing additional surgery, need of adjuvant medication after surgery, ovarian reserve and recurrence rate of endometriomas. Measurements will be performed at baseline, 6 weeks and 6, 12 and 18 months after randomisation. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS This study is funded by ZonMw, a Dutch organization for Health Research and Development, project number 80-85200-98-91041. The Department of Reproductive Medicine of the Amsterdam UMC location VUmc has received several research and educational grants from Guerbet, Merck KGaA and Ferring not related to the submitted work. B.W.J. Mol is supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (GNT1082548) and reports consultancy for ObsEva, Merck KGaA and Guerbet. V. Mijatovic reports grants from Guerbet, grants from Merck and grants from Ferring outside the submitted work. All authors declare that they have no competing interests concerning this publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Dutch Trial Register (NTR 7447, http://www.trialregister.nl). TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE 2 January 2019. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT First inclusion in randomised controlled trial October 4, 2019. First inclusion in cohort May 22, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E van Barneveld
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
- Research School Grow, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - V B Veth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
- Research School Grow, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - J M Sampat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
- Research School Grow, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - A M F Schreurs
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Endometriosis Center, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M van Wely
- Methodology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J E Bosmans
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, The Netherlands
| | - B de Bie
- Endometriosis Foundation of the Netherlands (Endometriose Stichting), Sittard, The Netherlands
| | - F W Jansen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, University of Leiden, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - E R Klinkert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - A W Nap
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - B W J Mol
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash Medical Centre Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - M Y Bongers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
- Research School Grow, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - V Mijatovic
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Endometriosis Center, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J W M Maas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Friedericy HJ, Sperna Weiland NH, van der Eijk AC, Jansen FW. [Steps for reducing the carbon footprint of the operating room]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2019; 163:D4095. [PMID: 31647618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The healthcare sector contributes significantly to global warming due to carbon emissions; this sector is, therefore, partially responsible for the negative effects of climate change on public health. Carbon emissions by the healthcare sector amount to 7% of the total carbon footprint of the Netherlands. It is anticipated that measures to reduce carbon emissions in the operating room (OR) can make an important contribution to reducing carbonemissions in the hospital as a whole. The most important elements contributing to the carbon footprint of the OR are: energy consumption for heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC); the emission of inhalation anaesthetics; the purchase of materials and equipment; and waste production. Direct carbon emissions by the OR can be reduced through the use of sustainable energy and setback of the HVAC outside office hours. Anaesthetists can dramatically reduce the carbon footprint of the OR by choosing for intravenous anaesthetics instead of inhalation anaesthetics. Indirect carbon emissions and waste production by the OR can be reduced through circular procurement, choosing reusable over disposable products and recycling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H J Friedericy
- LUMC, afd. Anesthesiologie, Leiden
- Contact: H.J. Friedericy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sandberg EM, Twijnstra A, van Meir CA, Kok HS, van Geloven N, Gludovacz K, Kolkman W, Nagel H, Haans L, Kapiteijn K, Jansen FW. Immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2019; 126:804-813. [PMID: 30548529 PMCID: PMC6593458 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate if immediate catheter removal (ICR) after laparoscopic hysterectomy is associated with similar retention outcomes compared with delayed removal (DCR). Study design Non‐inferiority randomised controlled trial. Population Women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy in six hospitals in the Netherlands. Methods Women were randomised to ICR or DCR (between 18 and 24 hours after surgery). Primary outcome The inability to void within 6 hours after catheter removal. Results One hundred and fifty‐five women were randomised to ICR (n = 74) and DCR (n = 81). The intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol analysis could not demonstrate the non‐inferiority of ICR: ten women with ICR could not urinate spontaneously within 6 hours compared with none in the delayed group (risk difference 13.5%, 5.6–24.8, P = 0.88). However, seven of these women could void spontaneously within 9 hours without additional intervention. Regarding the secondary outcomes, eight women from the delayed group requested earlier catheter removal because of complaints (9.9%). Three women with ICR (4.1%) had a urinary tract infection postoperatively versus eight with DCR (9.9%, risk difference −5.8%, −15.1 to 3.5, P = 0.215). Women with ICR mobilised significantly earlier (5.7 hours, 0.8–23.3 versus 21.0 hours, 1.4–29.9; P ≤ 0.001). Conclusion The non‐inferiority of ICR could not be demonstrated in terms of urinary retention 6 hours after procedure. However, 70% of the women with voiding difficulties could void spontaneously within 9 hours after laparoscopic hysterectomy. It is therefore questionable if all observed urinary retention cases were clinically relevant. As a result, the clinical advantages of ICR may still outweigh the risk of bladder retention and it should therefore be considered after uncomplicated laparoscopic hysterectomy. Tweetable abstract The advantages of immediate catheter removal after laparoscopic hysterectomy seem to outweigh the risk of bladder retention. The advantages of immediate catheter removal after laparoscopic hysterectomy seem to outweigh the risk of bladder retention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M Sandberg
- Department of Gynaecology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Arh Twijnstra
- Department of Gynaecology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - C A van Meir
- Department of Gynaecology, Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, the Netherlands
| | - H S Kok
- Departement of Gynaecology, Alrijne Ziekenhuis, Leiden/Leiderdorp, the Netherlands
| | - N van Geloven
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section Medical Statistics, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - K Gludovacz
- Departement of Gynaecology, Alrijne Ziekenhuis, Leiden/Leiderdorp, the Netherlands
| | - W Kolkman
- Department of Gynaecology, HagaZiekenhuis, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Htc Nagel
- Department of Gynaecology, Haaglanden Medisch Centrum, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Lcf Haans
- Department of Gynaecology, Haaglanden Medisch Centrum, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - K Kapiteijn
- Department of Gynaecology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - F W Jansen
- Department of Gynaecology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rikken JFW, Kowalik CR, Emanuel MH, Bongers MY, Spinder T, de Kruif JH, Bloemenkamp KWM, Jansen FW, Veersema S, Mulders AGMGJ, Thurkow AL, Hald K, Mohazzab A, Khalaf Y, Clark TJ, Farrugia M, van Vliet HA, Stephenson MS, van der Veen F, van Wely M, Mol BWJ, Goddijn M. The randomised uterine septum transsection trial (TRUST): design and protocol. BMC Womens Health 2018; 18:163. [PMID: 30290803 PMCID: PMC6173848 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-018-0637-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2016] [Accepted: 08/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A septate uterus is a uterine anomaly that may affect reproductive outcome, and is associated with an increased risk for miscarriage, subfertility and preterm birth. Resection of the septum is subject of debate. There is no convincing evidence concerning its effectiveness and safety. This study aims to assess whether hysteroscopic septum resection improves reproductive outcome in women with a septate uterus. METHODS/DESIGN A multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing hysteroscopic septum resection and expectant management in women with recurrent miscarriage or subfertility and diagnosed with a septate uterus. The primary outcome is live birth, defined as the birth of a living foetus beyond 24 weeks of gestational age. Secondary outcomes are ongoing pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and complications following hysteroscopic septum resection. The analysis will be performed according to the intention to treat principle. Kaplan-Meier curves will be constructed, estimating the cumulative probability of conception leading to live birth rate over time. Based on retrospective studies, we anticipate an improvement of the live birth rate from 35% without surgery to 70% with surgery. To demonstrate this difference, 68 women need to be randomised. DISCUSSION Hysteroscopic septum resection is worldwide considered as a standard procedure in women with a septate uterus. Solid evidence for this recommendation is lacking and data from randomised trials is urgently needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION Dutch trial registry ( NTR1676 , 18th of February 2009).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J F W Rikken
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100, DE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C R Kowalik
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100, DE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M H Emanuel
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Y Bongers
- Maxima Medical Centre, de Run 4600, 5504, DB, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - T Spinder
- Leeuwarden Medical Centre, Henri Dunantweg 2, 8934, AD, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - J H de Kruif
- Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, PO Box 9015, 6500, GS, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - K W M Bloemenkamp
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - F W Jansen
- University Medical Centre Leiden, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - S Veersema
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A G M G J Mulders
- Erasmus Medical Centre, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015, CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A L Thurkow
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100, DE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K Hald
- Oslo University Hospital, P. O. Box 4950, Nydalen, N-0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - A Mohazzab
- Avicenna research institute Teheran, PO Box: 19615-1177, Teheran, Postal code: 1936773493, Iran
| | - Y Khalaf
- Guy's hospital, Great maze pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - T J Clark
- Birmingham women's hospital, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, West Midlands, B15 2TG, UK
| | - M Farrugia
- East Kent Hospitals University, Ethelbert road, Canterbury, Kent, CT1 3NG, UK
| | - H A van Vliet
- Catharina hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - M S Stephenson
- University of Illinois Hospital, 1740 W Taylor St, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - F van der Veen
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100, DE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M van Wely
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100, DE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B W J Mol
- The Robinson Institute, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - M Goddijn
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100, DE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Berger J, Henneman O, Rhemrev J, Smeets M, Jansen FW. MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Imaging for Diagnosis of Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis - A Critical Appraisal. Ultrasound Int Open 2018; 4:E85-E90. [PMID: 30255164 PMCID: PMC6153145 DOI: 10.1055/a-0647-1575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2017] [Revised: 04/13/2018] [Accepted: 05/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose It was the aim of our study to evaluate this procedure using pelvic anatomical landmarks in order to assess the accuracy of fusion imaging and to critically evaluate the applicability in daily practice. Methods In a prospective, single center study, 10 patients with clinical signs of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) were selected. We measured the distance between the landmark organ and the target shown by the software system (measurement 1). Measurement 2 depicts the distance between the landmark and the nearest calibration point. The calibration inaccuracy was measured as a third type of measurement (measurement 3). Results Measurement 1: the average distance between the organ landmark to the target was 13.6 mm (range: 0–96 mm). Measurement 2: in 31 of the 40 attempts (77.5 %), we could measure the distance from the landmark organ to the nearest calibration point. The average distance was 34.4 mm (range: 0–69 mm). Measurement 3: A perfect match was seen in 6 of 20 attempts (30.0 %). There was a deviation in 14 of the 20 attempts (70.0 %). The mean distance was 11.1 mm (range: 6–23 mm). Conclusion Although very promising, MRI-ultrasound fusion imaging (MUFI) currently cannot be readily implemented into daily practice as a routine evaluation of DIE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith Berger
- Ziekenhuis Bronovo, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Den Haag, Netherlands.,Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, gynecology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Onno Henneman
- Ziekenhuis Bronovo, Radiology, Den Haag, Netherlands
| | | | - Maddy Smeets
- Ziekenhuis Bronovo, Gynecology, Den Haag, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Meeuwsen FC, van Luyn F, Blikkendaal MD, Jansen FW, van den Dobbelsteen JJ. Surgical phase modelling in minimal invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 2018; 33:1426-1432. [PMID: 30187202 PMCID: PMC6484813 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6417-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2018] [Accepted: 08/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Background Surgical Process Modelling (SPM) offers the possibility to automatically gain insight in the surgical workflow, with the potential to improve OR logistics and surgical care. Most studies have focussed on phase recognition modelling of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, because of its standard and frequent execution. To demonstrate the broad applicability of SPM, more diverse and complex procedures need to be studied. The aim of this study is to investigate the accuracy in which we can recognise and extract surgical phases in laparoscopic hysterectomies (LHs) with inherent variability in procedure time. To show the applicability of the approach, the model was used to automatically predict surgical end-times. Methods A dataset of 40 video-recorded LHs was manually annotated for instrument use and divided into ten surgical phases. The use of instruments provided the feature input for building a Random Forest surgical phase recognition model that was trained to automatically recognise surgical phases. Tenfold cross-validation was performed to optimise the model for predicting the surgical end-time throughout the procedure. Results Average surgery time is 128 ± 27 min. Large variability within specific phases is seen. Overall, the Random Forest model reaches an accuracy of 77% recognising the current phase in the procedure. Six of the phases are predicted accurately over 80% of their duration. When predicting the surgical end-time, on average an error of 16 ± 13 min is reached throughout the procedure. Conclusions This study demonstrates an intra-operative approach to recognise surgical phases in 40 laparoscopic hysterectomy cases based on instrument usage data. The model is capable of automatic detection of surgical phases for generation of a solid prediction of the surgical end-time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F C Meeuwsen
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands.
| | - F van Luyn
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - M D Blikkendaal
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - F W Jansen
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J J van den Dobbelsteen
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
van den Haak L, van der Eijk AC, Sandberg EM, Frank GPGM, Ansink K, Pelger RCM, de Kroon CD, Jansen FW. Towards spill-free in-bag morcellation: a health failure mode and effects analysis. Surg Endosc 2018; 32:4357-4362. [PMID: 29987561 PMCID: PMC6132883 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6284-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2017] [Accepted: 06/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess potential risks of new surgical procedures and devices before their introduction into daily practice, a prospective risk inventory (PRI) is a required step. This study assesses the applicability of the Health Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (HFMEA) as part of a PRI of new technology in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. METHODS A reference case was defined of a patient with presumed benign leiomyoma undergoing a laparoscopic hysterectomy or myomectomy including in-bag power morcellation; however, pathology defined a stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma. Using in-bag morcellation as a template, a HFMEA was performed. All steps of the in-bag morcellation technique were identified. Next, the possible hazards of these steps were explored and possible measures to control these hazards were discussed. RESULTS Five main steps of the morcellation process were identified. For retrieval bags without openings to accommodate instruments inside the bag, 120 risks were identified. Of these risks, 67 should be eliminated. For containment bags with openings 131 risks were identified of which 68 should be eliminated. Of the 10 causes most at risk to cause spillage, two can be eliminated by using appropriate bag materials. Myomectomy appears to be more at risk for residual tissue spillage compared to total hysterectomy. CONCLUSION The HFMEA has provided important new insights regarding potential weaknesses of the in-bag morcellation technique, particularly with respect to hazardous steps in the morcellation process as well as requirements that bags should meet. As such, this study has shown HFMEA to be a valuable method that identifies and quantifies potential hazards of new technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas van den Haak
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Anne C van der Eijk
- Central Sterile Supply Department, Leiden University Medica Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien M Sandberg
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard Peter G M Frank
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Ansink
- Operating Room Center, Leiden University Medica Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Rob C M Pelger
- Department of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Cor D de Kroon
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Willem Jansen
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, PO Box 5, 2600 AA, Delft, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sandberg EM, Leinweber FS, Herbschleb PJ, Berends-van der Meer DMA, Jansen FW. Urinary catheterisation management after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a national overview and a nurse preference survey. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2018; 38:1115-1120. [PMID: 29884072 DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1447914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the catheterisation regimes after a laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) in Dutch hospitals and to assess the nurses' opinion on this topic. This was particularly relevant as no consensus exists on the best moment to remove a urinary catheter after an LH. All 89 Dutch hospitals were successfully contacted and provided information on their catheterisation regime after LH: 69 (77.5%) hospitals reported removing the catheter the next morning after the LH, while nine hospitals (10.1%) removed it directly at the end of the procedure. The other 11 hospitals had different policies (four hours, up to two days). Additionally, all nurses working in the gynaecology departments of the hospitals affiliated to Leiden University were asked to fill in a self-developed questionnaire. Of the 111 nurses who completed the questionnaire (response rate 81%), 90% was convinced that a direct removal was feasible and 78% would recommend it to a family member or friend. Impact Statement What is already known on this subject? Although an indwelling catheter is routinely placed during a hysterectomy, it is unclear what the best moment is to remove it after an LH specifically. To fully benefit from the advantages associated with this minimally invasive approach, postoperative catheter management, should be, amongst others, optimal and LH-specific. A few studies have demonstrated that the direct removal of urinary catheter after an uncomplicated LH is feasible, but the evidence is limited. What the results of this study add? While waiting for the results of the randomised trials, this present study provides insight into the nationwide catheterisation management after an LH. Despite the lack of consensus on the topic, catheterisation management was quite uniform in the Netherlands: most Dutch hospitals removed the urinary catheter one day after an LH. Yet, this was not in line with the opinion of the surveyed nurses, as the majority would recommend a direct removal. This is interesting as nurses are closely involved in the patients' postoperative care. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Although randomised trials are necessary to determine an optimal catheterisation management, the findings of this present study are valuable if a new urinary catheter regime has to be implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelien M Sandberg
- a Department of Gynaecology , Leiden University Medical Centre , Leiden , The Netherlands
| | - Fleur S Leinweber
- a Department of Gynaecology , Leiden University Medical Centre , Leiden , The Netherlands
| | - Petra J Herbschleb
- a Department of Gynaecology , Leiden University Medical Centre , Leiden , The Netherlands
| | | | - Frank Willem Jansen
- a Department of Gynaecology , Leiden University Medical Centre , Leiden , The Netherlands.,b Department of Biomechanical Engineering , Delft University of Technology , Delft , The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sandberg EM, Driessen SRC, Bak EAT, van Geloven N, Berger JP, Smeets MJGH, Rhemrev JPT, Jansen FW. Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy with concomitant endometriosis without bowel or bladder dissection: a cohort analysis to define a case-mix variable. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 15:8. [PMID: 29576761 PMCID: PMC5856860 DOI: 10.1186/s10397-018-1039-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2017] [Accepted: 02/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Pelvic endometriosis is often mentioned as one of the variables influencing surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). However, its additional surgical risks have not been well established. The aim of this study was to analyze to what extent concomitant endometriosis influences surgical outcomes of LH and to determine if it should be considered as case-mix variable. Results A total of 2655 LH’s were analyzed, of which 397 (15.0%) with concomitant endometriosis. For blood loss and operative time, no measurable association was found for stages I (n = 106) and II (n = 103) endometriosis compared to LH without endometriosis. LH with stages III (n = 93) and IV (n = 95) endometriosis were associated with more intra-operative blood loss (p = < .001) and a prolonged operative time (p = < .001) compared to LH without endometriosis. No significant association was found between endometriosis (all stages) and complications (p = .62). Conclusions The findings of our study have provided numeric support for the influence of concomitant endometriosis on surgical outcomes of LH, without bowel or bladder dissection. Only stages III and IV were associated with a longer operative time and more blood loss and should thus be considered as case-mix variables in future quality measurement tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelien M Sandberg
- 1Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Sara R C Driessen
- 1Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Evelien A T Bak
- 1Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Nan van Geloven
- 2Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Judith P Berger
- 1Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Gynecology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, the Hague, the Netherlands
| | | | - Johann P T Rhemrev
- Department of Gynecology, Haaglanden Medical Centre, the Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Frank Willem Jansen
- 1Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.,4Department BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.,5Department of Gynecology, Minimally Invasive Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Blikkendaal MD, Driessen SRC, Rodrigues SP, Rhemrev JPT, Smeets MJGH, Dankelman J, van den Dobbelsteen JJ, Jansen FW. Measuring surgical safety during minimally invasive surgical procedures: a validation study. Surg Endosc 2018; 32:3087-3095. [PMID: 29352453 PMCID: PMC5988766 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6021-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2017] [Accepted: 01/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the implementation of new interventions (i.e., surgical devices and technologies) in the operating room, surgical safety might be compromised. Current safety measures are insufficient in detecting safety hazards during this process. The aim of the study was to observe whether surgical teams are capable of measuring surgical safety, especially with regard to the introduction of new interventions. METHODS A Surgical Safety Questionnaire was developed that had to be filled out directly postoperative by three surgical team members. A potential safety concern was defined as at least one answer between (strongly) disagree and indifferent. The validity of the questionnaire was assessed by comparison with the results from video analysis. Two different observers annotated the presence and effect of surgical flow disturbances during 40 laparoscopic hysterectomies performed between November 2010 and April 2012. RESULTS The surgeon reported a potential safety concern in 16% (85/520 questions). With respect to the scrub nurse and anesthesiologist, this was both 9% (46/520). With respect to the preparation, functioning, and ease of use of the devices in 37.5-47.5% (15-19/40 procedures) a potential safety concern was reported by one or more team members. During procedures after which a potential safety concern was reported, surgical flow disturbances lasted a higher percentage of the procedure duration [9.3 ± 6.2 vs. 2.9 ± 3.7% (mean ± SD), p < .001]. After procedures during which a new instrument or device was used, more potential safety concerns were reported (51.2 vs. 23.1%, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS Potential safety concerns were especially reported during procedures in which a relatively high percentage of the duration consisted of surgical flow disturbances and during procedures in which a new instrument or device was used. The Surgical Safety Questionnaire can act as a validated tool to evaluate and maintain surgical safety during minimally invasive procedures, especially during the introduction of a new intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathijs D Blikkendaal
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Sara R C Driessen
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sharon P Rodrigues
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Johann P T Rhemrev
- Department of Gynecology, Haaglanden Medical Center, P.O. Box 96900, 2509 JH, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Maddy J G H Smeets
- Department of Gynecology, Haaglanden Medical Center, P.O. Box 96900, 2509 JH, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Jenny Dankelman
- Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - John J van den Dobbelsteen
- Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Willem Jansen
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
van den Haak L, Alleblas C, Rhemrev JP, Scheltes J, Nieboer TE, Jansen FW. Human cadavers to evaluate prototypes of minimally invasive surgical instruments: A feasibility study. Technol Health Care 2017; 25:1139-1146. [PMID: 28946605 DOI: 10.3233/thc-171029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND New technology should be extensively tested before it is tried on patients. Unfortunately representative models are lacking. In theory, fresh frozen human cadavers are excellent models. OBJECTIVE To identify strengths and weaknesses of fresh frozen human cadavers as research models for new technology prior to implementation in gynecological surgery. METHODS During pre-clinical validation studies regarding the MobiSep uterine manipulator, test procedures were performed on fresh frozen cadavers. Both the experimental setup as the performance of the prototype were assessed. RESULTS Five tests including six human cadavers were performed. Major changes were made to the MobiSep prototype design. The cadavers of two tests closely resembled surgical experiences as found in live patients. The anatomy of 4 of the 6 cadavers was not fully representative due to atrophy of the internal genitalia caused by age and due to the presence of pathology such extensive tumorous tissue. CONCLUSION The cadaver tests provided vital information regarding design and functionality, that failed to emerge during the in-vitro testing. However, experiments are subject to anatomical uncertainties or restrictions. Consequently, the suitability of a cadaver should be carefully assessed before it is used for testing new technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas van den Haak
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Chantal Alleblas
- Department of Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johann P Rhemrev
- Department of Gynecology, Bronovo Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Jules Scheltes
- Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frank Willem Jansen
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Sandberg EM, Hehenkamp WJK, Geomini PM, Janssen PF, Jansen FW, Twijnstra ARH. Laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications: clinical practice guideline. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017; 296:597-606. [PMID: 28748339 PMCID: PMC5548857 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-017-4467-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2017] [Accepted: 07/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Since the introduction of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery, the percentage of advanced laparoscopic procedures has greatly increased worldwide. It seems therefore, timely to standardize laparoscopic gynecologic care according to the principles of evidence-based medicine. With this goal in mind—the Dutch Society of Gynecological Endoscopic Surgery initiated in The Netherlands the development of a national guideline for laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). This present article provides a summary of the main recommendations of the guideline. Methods This guideline was developed following the Dutch guideline of medical specialists and in accordance with the AGREE II tool. Clinically important issues were firstly defined and translated into research questions. A literature search per topic was then conducted to identify relevant articles. The quality of the evidence of these articles was rated following the GRADE systematic. An expert panel consisting of 18 selected gynecologists was consulted to formulate best practice recommendations for each topic. Results Ten topics were considered in this guideline, including amongst others, the different approaches for hysterectomy, advice regarding tissue extraction, pre-operative medical treatment and prevention of ureter injury. This work resulted in the development of a clinical practical guideline of LH with evidence- and expert-based recommendations. The guideline is currently being implemented in The Netherlands. Conclusion A guideline for LH was developed. It gives an overview of best clinical practice recommendations. It serves to standardize care, provides guidance for daily practice and aims to guarantee the quality of LH at an (inter)national level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelien M Sandberg
- Section Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter J K Hehenkamp
- Department of Gynecology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peggy M Geomini
- Department of Gynecology, Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Petra F Janssen
- Department of Gynecology, Elisabeth-Twee Steden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Willem Jansen
- Section Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Bio Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Andries R H Twijnstra
- Section Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
van Hoogenhuijze NE, Torrance HL, Mol F, Laven JSE, Scheenjes E, Traas MAF, Janssen C, Cohlen B, Teklenburg G, de Bruin JP, van Oppenraaij R, Maas JWM, Moll E, Fleischer K, van Hooff MH, de Koning C, Cantineau A, Lambalk CB, Verberg M, Nijs M, Manger AP, van Rumste M, van der Voet LF, Preys-Bosman A, Visser J, Brinkhuis E, den Hartog JE, Sluijmer A, Jansen FW, Hermes W, Bandell ML, Pelinck MJ, van Disseldorp J, van Wely M, Smeenk J, Pieterse QD, Boxmeer JC, Groenewoud ER, Eijkemans MJC, Kasius JC, Broekmans FJM. Endometrial scratching in women with implantation failure after a first IVF/ICSI cycle; does it lead to a higher live birth rate? The SCRaTCH study: a randomized controlled trial (NTR 5342). BMC Womens Health 2017; 17:47. [PMID: 28732531 PMCID: PMC5521151 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-017-0378-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2016] [Accepted: 03/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Success rates of assisted reproductive techniques (ART) are approximately 30%, with the most important limiting factor being embryo implantation. Mechanical endometrial injury, also called 'scratching', has been proposed to positively affect the chance of implantation after embryo transfer, but the currently available evidence is not yet conclusive. The primary aim of this study is to determine the effect of endometrial scratching prior to a second fresh in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycle on live birth rates in women with a failed first IVF/ICSI cycle. METHOD Multicenter randomized controlled trial in Dutch academic and non-academic hospitals. A total of 900 women will be included of whom half will undergo an endometrial scratch in the luteal phase of the cycle prior to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation using an endometrial biopsy catheter. The primary endpoint is the live birth rate after the 2nd fresh IVF/ICSI cycle. Secondary endpoints are costs, cumulative live birth rate (after the full 2nd IVF/ICSI cycle and over 12 months of follow-up); clinical and ongoing pregnancy rate; multiple pregnancy rate; miscarriage rate and endometrial tissue parameters associated with implantation failure. DISCUSSION Multiple studies have been performed to investigate the effect of endometrial scratching on live birth rates in women undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles. Due to heterogeneity in both the method and population being scratched, it remains unclear which group of women will benefit from the procedure. The SCRaTCH trial proposed here aims to investigate the effect of endometrial scratching prior to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in a large group of women undergoing a second IVF/ICSI cycle. TRIAL REGISTRATION NTR 5342 , registered July 31st, 2015. PROTOCOL VERSION Version 4.10, January 4th, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N E van Hoogenhuijze
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - H L Torrance
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - F Mol
- Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J S E Laven
- Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E Scheenjes
- Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands
| | | | - C Janssen
- Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, The Netherlands
| | - B Cohlen
- Isala Fertilityclinic, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | | | - J P de Bruin
- Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | | | - J W M Maas
- Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - E Moll
- Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K Fleischer
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - C de Koning
- Ter Gooi Hospital, Hilversum, The Netherlands
| | - A Cantineau
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - C B Lambalk
- Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Verberg
- Fertility Clinic Twente, Hengelo, The Netherlands
| | - M Nijs
- Nij Geertgen, Elsendorp, The Netherlands
| | - A P Manger
- Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - J Visser
- Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - E Brinkhuis
- Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - J E den Hartog
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - A Sluijmer
- Wilhelmina Hospital Assen, Assen, The Netherlands
| | - F W Jansen
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - W Hermes
- Medical Center Haaglanden-Bronovo-Nebo, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - M L Bandell
- Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Sliedrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - M van Wely
- Dutch Consortium for Healthcare Evaluation and Research in Obstetrics and Gynecology - NVOG Consortium 2.0, Dutch, The Netherlands
| | - J Smeenk
- St. Elisabeth-Twee Steden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | | | - J C Boxmeer
- Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | | - M J C Eijkemans
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J C Kasius
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - F J M Broekmans
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The success of newly introduced surgical techniques is generally primarily assessed by surgical outcome measures. However, data on medical liability should concomitantly be used to evaluate provided care as they give a unique insight into substandard care from patient's point of view. The aim of this study was to analyze the number and type of medical claims after laparoscopic gynecologic procedures since the introduction of advanced laparoscopy two decades ago. Secondly, our objective was to identify trends and/or risk factors associated with these claims. METHODS To identify the claims, we searched the databases of the two largest medical liability mutual insurance companies in The Netherlands (MediRisk and Centramed), covering together 96% of the Dutch hospitals. All claims related to laparoscopic gynecologic surgery and filed between 1993 and 2015 were included. RESULTS A total of 133 claims met our inclusion criteria, of which 54 were accepted claims (41%) and 79 rejected (59%). The number of claims remained relatively constant over time. The majority of claims were filed for visceral and/or vascular injuries (82%), specifically to the bowel (40%) and ureters (20%). More than one-third of the injuries were entry related (38%) and 77% of the claims were filed after non-advanced procedures. A delay in diagnosing injuries was the primary reason for financial compensation (33%). The median sum paid to patients was €12,000 (500-848,689). In 90 claims, an attorney was defending the patient (83% for the accepted claims; 57% for the rejected claims). CONCLUSION The number of claims remained relatively constant during the study period. Most claims were provoked by bowel and ureter injuries. Delay in recognizing injuries was the most encountered reason for granting financial compensation. Entering the abdominal cavity during laparoscopy continues to be a potential dangerous step. As a result, gynecologists are recommended to thoroughly counsel patients undergoing any laparoscopic procedure, even regarding the risk of entry-related injuries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelien M Sandberg
- Department of Gyaecology, Section Minimally Invasive Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Esmée M Bordewijk
- Department of Gynecology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Désirée Klemann
- Department of Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sara R C Driessen
- Department of Gyaecology, Section Minimally Invasive Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Andries R H Twijnstra
- Department of Gyaecology, Section Minimally Invasive Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Willem Jansen
- Department of Gyaecology, Section Minimally Invasive Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- Department Bio Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Sandberg EM, Twijnstra AR, Driessen SR, Jansen FW. Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017; 24:206-217.e22. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2016] [Revised: 09/19/2016] [Accepted: 10/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
38
|
Sandberg EM, Leinweber FS, de Vos MS, Linthorst J, Holman FA, Twijnstra ARH, Jansen FW. [Optimising postoperative recovery at home; individualised discharge policy and task division between GP and medical specialist]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2017; 161:D1672. [PMID: 29098970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
In the last decennia, the length of hospital stay of admitted patients has significantly decreased in all medical fields. As a result, postoperative recovery mainly takes place at home, inherently leading to new challenges. Here, two patients are being discussed for whom the postoperative period was substandard. To guarantee optimal quality of care in the home situation, the medical specialist and the general practitioner need to make the necessary arrangements. We would first of all recommend providing each discharged patient with specific, structured and individualised advices regarding postoperative recovery but also regarding alarm symptoms and logistics (e.g. who to call in case of emergency). Finally, we believe that, as (serious) complications are rare, it should be agreed on the fact that the responsible medical specialist is the coordinator of the postoperative period and the first contact point for postoperative patients.
Collapse
|
39
|
Driessen SR, Van Zwet EW, Haazebroek P, Sandberg EM, Blikkendaal MD, Twijnstra AR, Jansen FW. A dynamic quality assessment tool for laparoscopic hysterectomy to measure surgical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215:754.e1-754.e8. [PMID: 27402052 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2016] [Revised: 06/28/2016] [Accepted: 07/01/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current health care system has an urgent need for tools to measure quality. A wide range of quality indicators have been developed in an attempt to differentiate between high-quality and low-quality health care processes. However, one of the main issues of currently used indicators is the lack of case-mix correction and improvement possibilities. Case-mix is defined as specific (patient) characteristics that are known to potentially affect (surgical) outcome. If these characteristics are not taken into consideration, comparisons of outcome among health care providers may not be valid. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to develop and test a quality assessment tool for laparoscopic hysterectomy, which can serve as a new outcome quality indicator. STUDY DESIGN This is a prospective, international, multicenter implementation study. A web-based application was developed with 3 main goals: (1) to measure the surgeon's performance using 3 primary outcomes (blood loss, operative time, and complications); (2) to provide immediate individual feedback using cumulative observed-minus-expected graphs; and (3) to detect consistently suboptimal performance after correcting for case-mix characteristics. All gynecologists who perform laparoscopic hysterectomies were requested to register their procedures in the application. A patient safety risk factor checklist was used by the surgeon for reflection. Thereafter a prospective implementation study was performed, and the application was tested using a survey that included the System Usability Scale. RESULTS A total of 2066 laparoscopic hysterectomies were registered by 81 gynecologists. Mean operative time was 100 ± 39 minutes, blood loss 127 ± 163 mL, and the complication rate 6.1%. The overall survey response rate was 75%, and the mean System Usability Scale was 76.5 ± 13.6, which indicates that the application was good to excellent. The majority of surgeons reported that the application made them more aware of their performance, the outcomes, and patient safety, and they noted that the application provided motivation for improving future performance. CONCLUSION We report the development and test of a real-time, dynamic, quality assessment tool for measuring individual surgical outcome for laparoscopic hysterectomy. Importantly, this tool provides opportunities for improving surgical performance. Our study provides a foundation for helping clinicians develop evidence-based quality indicators for other surgical procedures.
Collapse
|
40
|
Driessen SRC, Sandberg EM, Rodrigues SP, van Zwet EW, Jansen FW. Identification of risk factors in minimally invasive surgery: a prospective multicenter study. Surg Endosc 2016; 31:2467-2473. [PMID: 27800588 PMCID: PMC5443851 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5248-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2016] [Accepted: 09/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background Since the introduction of minimally invasive surgery (MIS), concerns for patient safety are more often brought to the attention. Knowledge about and awareness of patient safety risk factors are crucial in order to improve and enhance the surgical team, the environment, and finally surgical performance. The aim of this study was to identify and quantify patient safety risk factors in laparoscopic hysterectomy and to determine their influence on surgical outcomes. Methods A prospective multicenter study was conducted from April 2014 to January 2016, participating gynecologists registered their performed laparoscopic hysterectomies (LHs). If deemed necessary, gynecologists could fill out a checklist with validated patient safety risk factors. Association between procedures with and without an occurred risk factor(s) and the surgical outcomes (blood loss, operative time, and complications) were assessed, using multivariate logistic regression and generalized estimation equations. Results Eighty-five gynecologists participated in the study, registering a total of 2237 LHs. For 627(28 %) procedures, the checklist was entered (in total 920 items). The most reported risk factors were related to the surgeon (19.6 %), the surgical team (14.4 %), technology (16.6 %), and the patient (26.8 %). The procedures where a risk factor was registered had significantly less favorable outcomes, higher complication rate (10.5 vs. 4.8 % (p = 0.002), longer operative time [114 vs. 95 min (p < 0.001)], and more blood loss [110 vs. 168 mL (p = 0.047)], which was mainly due to the technological and patient-related risk factors. Conclusion Technological incidents are the most important and clinically relevant risk factors affecting surgical outcomes of LH. Future improvements of MIS need to focus on this. As awareness of safety risk factors in MIS is important, embedding of a safety risk factor checklist in registration systems will help surgeons to evaluate and improve their individual performance. This will inherently improve the surgical outcomes and thus patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara R C Driessen
- Department of Gynaecology, Section Minimally Invasive Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien M Sandberg
- Department of Gynaecology, Section Minimally Invasive Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sharon P Rodrigues
- Department of Gynaecology, Section Minimally Invasive Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Erik W van Zwet
- Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Willem Jansen
- Department of Gynaecology, Section Minimally Invasive Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. .,Department BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, PO Box 5, 2600 AA, Delft, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Lier MCI, Malik RF, van Waesberghe JHTM, Maas JW, van Rumpt-van de Geest DA, Coppus SF, Berger JP, van Rijn BB, Janssen PF, de Boer MA, de Vries JIP, Jansen FW, Brosens IA, Lambalk CB, Mijatovic V. Spontaneous haemoperitoneum in pregnancy and endometriosis: a case series. BJOG 2016; 124:306-312. [DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- MCI Lier
- Department of Reproductive Medicine; VU University Medical Centre; Endometriosis Centre VUmc; Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - RF Malik
- Department of Reproductive Medicine; VU University Medical Centre; Endometriosis Centre VUmc; Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - JHTM van Waesberghe
- Department of Radiology; VU University Medical Centre; Endometriosis Centre VUmc; Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - JW Maas
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology; Maxima Medical Centre; Veldhoven the Netherlands
| | | | - SF Coppus
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology; Radboud University Medical Centre; Nijmegen the Netherlands
| | - JP Berger
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology; Bronovo Hospital; Den Haag the Netherlands
| | - BB van Rijn
- Department of Obstetrics; Wilhelmina Children's Hospital Birth Centre; University Medical Centre Utrecht; Utrecht the Netherlands
- Academic Unit Human Development and Health; Institute for Life Sciences; University of Southampton; Southampton UK
| | - PF Janssen
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology; St. Elisabeth Hospital; Tilburg the Netherlands
| | - MA de Boer
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology; VU University Medical Centre; Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - JIP de Vries
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology; VU University Medical Centre; Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - FW Jansen
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology; Leiden University Medical Centre; Leiden the Netherlands
| | - IA Brosens
- Leuven Institute for Fertility and Embryology; Leuven Belgium
| | - CB Lambalk
- Department of Reproductive Medicine; VU University Medical Centre; Endometriosis Centre VUmc; Amsterdam the Netherlands
| | - V Mijatovic
- Department of Reproductive Medicine; VU University Medical Centre; Endometriosis Centre VUmc; Amsterdam the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Sandberg EM, Cohen SL, Jansen FW, Einarsson JI. Laparoscopic Myomectomy as a New Standard: An Analysis of Risk Factors for Conversion. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016; 22:S62. [PMID: 27679293 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- E M Sandberg
- Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Zuid Holland, Netherlands
| | - S L Cohen
- Gynaecology (Minimally Invasive Surgery), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - F W Jansen
- Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Zuid Holland, Netherlands
| | - J I Einarsson
- Gynaecology (Minimally Invasive Surgery), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Driessen SRC, Wallwiener M, Taran FA, Cohen SL, Kraemer B, Wallwiener CW, van Zwet EW, Brucker SY, Jansen FW. Hospital versus individual surgeon's performance in laparoscopic hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016; 295:111-117. [PMID: 27628752 PMCID: PMC5225188 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-016-4199-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2016] [Accepted: 09/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To compare hospital versus individual surgeon’s perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH), and to assess the relationship between surgeon experience and perioperative outcomes. Methods A retrospective analysis of all prospective collected LHs performed from 2003 to 2010 at one medical center was performed. Perioperative outcomes (operative time, blood loss, complication rate) were assessed on both a hospital level and surgeon level using Cumulative Observed minus Expected performance graphs. Results A total of 1618 LHs were performed, 16 % total laparoscopic hysterectomies and 84 % laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomies. Overall outcomes included mean (SD±) blood loss 108.9 ± 69.2 mL, mean operative time 95.4 ± 39.7 min and a complication occurred in 76 (4.7 %) of cases. Suboptimal perioperative outcomes of an individual surgeon were not always detected on a hospital level. However, collective suboptimal outcomes were faster detected on a hospital level compared to individual surgeon’s level. Evidence of a learning curve is seen; for the first 100 procedures, a decrease in operative time is observed as individual surgeon experience increases. Similarly, the risk of conversion decreases up to the first 50 procedures. Conclusion An individual outlier (i.e., surgeon with consistently suboptimal performance) will not always be detected when monitoring outcome measures only on a hospital level. However, monitoring outcome measures on a hospital level will detect suboptimal performance earlier compared to monitoring only on an individual surgeon’s level. To detect performance outliers timely, insight into an individual surgeon’s outcome and skills is recommended. Furthermore, an experienced surgeon is no guarantee for acceptable surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara R C Driessen
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, INF 440, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tuebingen, Calwerstr. 7, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Sarah L Cohen
- Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Bernhard Kraemer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tuebingen, Calwerstr. 7, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Christian W Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tuebingen, Calwerstr. 7, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Erik W van Zwet
- Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sara Y Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tuebingen, Calwerstr. 7, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Frank Willem Jansen
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. .,Department BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, PO Box 5, 2600 AA, Delft, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Driessen SRC, Haazebroek P, Basropansingh W, Van Zwet EW, Jansen FW. Gamification to Engage Clinicians in Registering Data: A Randomized Trial. Glob J Health Sci 2016. [DOI: 10.5539/gjhs.v9n4p240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
<p><strong>OBJECTIVE: </strong>To determine the effect of additional gamification elements in a web-based registry system in terms of engagement and involvement to register outcome data, and to determine if gamification elements have any effect on clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>METHODS:</strong> Randomized controlled trial for gynecologists to register their performed laparoscopic hysterectomies (LH) in an online application. Gynecologists were randomized for two types of registries.<strong> </strong>Both groups received access to the online application; after registering a procedure, direct individual feedback on surgical outcomes was provided by showing three proficiency graphs. In the intervention group, additionally gamification elements were shown. These gamification elements consisted of points and achievements that could be earned and insight in monthly collective scores. All gamification elements were based on positive enforcement.</p><p><strong>RESULTS: </strong>A total of<strong> </strong>71 gynecologists were randomized and entered a total of 1833 LH procedures. No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of engagement and involvement on a 5-point Likert scale, respectively 2.34±0.87 versus 2.56±1.05 and 3.63±0.57 versus 3.33±1.03 for the intervention versus the control group (p>0.05). The intervention group showed longer operative time than the control group (108±42 vs. 101±34 minutes, p=0.04), no other differences were found in terms of surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>CONCLUSIONS: </strong>The addition of gamification elements in a registry system did not enhance the engagement and involvement of clinicians to register their clinical data. Based on our results, we advise that registry systems for clinical data should be as simple as possible with the focus on the main goal of the registry.</p>
Collapse
|
45
|
Sandberg EM, van den Haak L, Bosse T, Jansen FW. Disseminated leiomyoma cells can be identified following conventional myomectomy. BJOG 2016; 123:2183-2187. [DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- EM Sandberg
- Department of Gynaecology; Leiden University Medical Centre; Leiden the Netherlands
| | - L van den Haak
- Department of Gynaecology; Leiden University Medical Centre; Leiden the Netherlands
| | - T Bosse
- Department of Pathology; Leiden University Medical Centre; Leiden the Netherlands
| | - FW Jansen
- Department of Gynaecology; Leiden University Medical Centre; Leiden the Netherlands
- Department of BioMechanical Engineering; Delft University of Technology; Delft the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Driessen SR, Van Zwet EW, Haazebroek P, Sandberg EM, Blikkendaal MD, Twijnstra AR, Jansen FW. A dynamic quality assessment tool for laparoscopic hysterectomy to measure surgical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016:S0002-9378(16)30440-9. [PMID: 27403847 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2016] [Revised: 06/28/2016] [Accepted: 07/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current healthcare system has an urgent need for tools to measure quality. A wide range of quality indicators have been developed in an attempt to differentiate between high-quality and low-quality healthcare processes. However, one of the main issues of currently used indicators is the lack of case-mix correction and improvement possibilities. Case-mix is defined as specific (patient) characteristics that are known to potentially affect (surgical) outcome. If these characteristics are not taken into consideration, comparisons of outcome among healthcare providers may not be valid OBJECTIVE: To develop and test a quality assessment tool for laparoscopic hysterectomy, which can serve as a new outcome quality indicator STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective international multicenter implementation study. A web-based application (.www.qusum.org) was developed with three main goals: to measure the surgeon's performance using three primary outcomes (blood loss, operative time, and complications); to provide immediate individual feedback using cumulative Observed-minus-Expected graphs; and to detect consistently suboptimal performance after correcting for case-mix characteristics. All gynecologists who perform laparoscopic hysterectomies were requested to register their procedures in the application. A patient safety risk factor checklist was used by the surgeon for reflection. Thereafter, a prospective implementation study was performed, and the application was tested using a survey that included the System Usability Scale. RESULTS A total of 2066 laparoscopic hysterectomies were registered by 81 gynecologists. Mean operative time was 100±39 minutes, blood loss 127±163ml, and the complication rate 6.1%. The overall survey response rate was 75%, and the mean System Usability Scale was 76.5±13.6, which indicates that the application was good to excellent. The majority of surgeons reported that the application made them more aware of their performance, the outcomes, and patient safety, and they noted that the application provided motivation for improving future performance. CONCLUSIONS We report the development and test of a real-time, dynamic quality assessment tool for measuring individual surgical outcome for laparoscopic hysterectomy. Importantly, this tool provides opportunities for improving surgical performance. Our study provides a foundation for helping clinicians develop evidence-based quality indicators for other surgical procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Rc Driessen
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Erik W Van Zwet
- Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Pascal Haazebroek
- Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien M Sandberg
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mathijs D Blikkendaal
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Andries Rh Twijnstra
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Willem Jansen
- Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, PO Box 5, 2600 AA, Delft, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Blikkendaal MD, Driessen SRC, Rodrigues SP, Rhemrev JPT, Smeets MJGH, Dankelman J, van den Dobbelsteen JJ, Jansen FW. Surgical flow disturbances in dedicated minimally invasive surgery suites: an observational study to assess its supposed superiority over conventional suites. Surg Endosc 2016; 31:288-298. [PMID: 27198548 PMCID: PMC5216055 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4971-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2015] [Accepted: 05/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is frequently compromised by surgical flow disturbances due to technology- and equipment-related failures. Compared with MIS in a conventional cart-based OR, performing MIS in a dedicated integrated operating room (OR) is supposed to be beneficial to patient safety. The aim of this study was to compare a conventional OR with an integrated OR with regard to the incidence and effect of equipment-related surgical flow disturbances during an advanced laparoscopic gynecological procedure [laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH)]. Methods Using video recording, 40 LHs performed between November 2010 and April 2012 (20 in a conventional cart-based OR and 20 in an integrated OR) were analyzed by two different observers. Outcome measures were the number, duration and effect (on a seven-point ordinal scale) of the surgical flow disturbances (e.g., malfunctioning, intraoperative repositioning, setup device). Results A total of 103 h and 45 min was observed. The interobserver agreement was high (kappa .85, p < .001). Procedure time was not significantly different (NS) [conventional OR vs. integrated OR, minutes ± standard deviation (SD), mean 161 ± 27 vs. 150 ± 34]. A total of 1651 surgical flow disturbances were observed (mean ± SD per procedure 40.8 ± 19.4 vs. 41.8 ± 15.9, NS). The mean number of surgical flow disturbances per procedure with regard to equipment was 6.3 ± 3.7 versus 8.5 ± 4.0, NS. No clinically relevant differences in the mean effect of these disturbances on the surgical flow between the two OR setups were observed. Conclusions Performing LH in an integrated OR did not reduce the number of surgical flow disturbances nor the effect of these disturbances. Furthermore, in the integrated OR, repositioning of the monitors was a frequent and time-consuming source of disturbance. In order to maintain the high standard of surgical safety, the entire surgical team has to be aware that by performing surgery in an integrated OR different potential source for disruption arise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathijs D Blikkendaal
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sara R C Driessen
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sharon P Rodrigues
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Johann P T Rhemrev
- Department of Gynecology, Bronovo Hospital, PO Box 96900, 2509 JH, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Maddy J G H Smeets
- Department of Gynecology, Bronovo Hospital, PO Box 96900, 2509 JH, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Jenny Dankelman
- Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Technical University Delft, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - John J van den Dobbelsteen
- Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Technical University Delft, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Willem Jansen
- Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. .,Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Technical University Delft, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Sandberg EM, Cohen SL, Jansen FW, Einarsson JI. Analysis of Risk Factors for Intraoperative Conversion of Laparoscopic Myomectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016; 23:352-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2015] [Revised: 10/27/2015] [Accepted: 10/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
49
|
van den Haak L, Arkenbout EA, Sandberg EM, Jansen FW. Power Morcellator Features Affecting Tissue Spill in Gynecologic Laparoscopy: An In-Vitro Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016; 23:107-12. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2015] [Revised: 09/14/2015] [Accepted: 09/16/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
50
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic surgery has led to great clinical improvements in many fields of surgery; however, it requires the use of trocars, which may lead to complications as well as postoperative pain. The complications include intra-abdominal vascular and visceral injury, trocar site bleeding, herniation and infection. Many of these are extremely rare, such as vascular and visceral injury, but may be life-threatening; therefore, it is important to determine how these types of complications may be prevented. It is hypothesised that trocar-related complications and pain may be attributable to certain types of trocars. This systematic review was designed to improve patient safety by determining which, if any, specific trocar types are less likely to result in complications and postoperative pain. OBJECTIVES To analyse the rates of trocar-related complications and postoperative pain for different trocar types used in people undergoing laparoscopy, regardless of the condition. SEARCH METHODS Two experienced librarians conducted a comprehensive search for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, CDSR and DARE (up to 26 May 2015). We checked trial registers and reference lists from trial and review articles, and approached content experts. SELECTION CRITERIA RCTs that compared rates of trocar-related complications and postoperative pain for different trocar types used in people undergoing laparoscopy. The primary outcomes were major trocar-related complications, such as mortality, conversion due to any trocar-related adverse event, visceral injury, vascular injury and other injuries that required intensive care unit (ICU) management or a subsequent surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention. Secondary outcomes were minor trocar-related complications and postoperative pain. We excluded trials that studied non-conventional laparoscopic incisions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently conducted the study selection, risk of bias assessment and data extraction. We used GRADE to assess the overall quality of the evidence. We performed sensitivity analyses and investigation of heterogeneity, where possible. MAIN RESULTS We included seven RCTs (654 participants). One RCT studied four different trocar types, while the remaining six RCTs studied two different types. The following trocar types were examined: radially expanding versus cutting (six studies; 604 participants), conical blunt-tipped versus cutting (two studies; 72 participants), radially expanding versus conical blunt-tipped (one study; 28 participants) and single-bladed versus pyramidal-bladed (one study; 28 participants). The evidence was very low quality: limitations were insufficient power, very serious imprecision and incomplete outcome data. Primary outcomesFour of the included studies reported on visceral and vascular injury (571 participants), which are two of our primary outcomes. These RCTs examined 473 participants where radially expanding versus cutting trocars were used. We found no evidence of a difference in the incidence of visceral (Peto odds ratio (OR) 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06 to 15.32) and vascular injury (Peto OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.0 to 7.16), both very low quality evidence. However, the incidence of these types of injuries were extremely low (i.e. two cases of visceral and one case of vascular injury for all of the included studies). There were no cases of either visceral or vascular injury for any of the other trocar type comparisons. No studies reported on any other primary outcomes, such as mortality, conversion to laparotomy, intensive care admission or any re-intervention. Secondary outcomesFor trocar site bleeding, the use of radially expanding trocars was associated with a lower risk of trocar site bleeding compared to cutting trocars (Peto OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.54, five studies, 553 participants, very low quality evidence). This suggests that if the risk of trocar site bleeding with the use of cutting trocars is assumed to be 11.5%, the risk with the use of radially expanding trocars would be 3.5%. There was insufficient evidence to reach a conclusion regarding other trocar types, their related complications and postoperative pain, as no studies reported data suitable for analysis. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Data were lacking on the incidence of major trocar-related complications, such as visceral or vascular injury, when comparing different trocar types with one another. However, caution is urged when interpreting these results because the incidence of serious complications following the use of a trocar was extremely low. There was very low quality evidence for minor trocar-related complications suggesting that the use of radially expanding trocars compared to cutting trocars leads to reduced incidence of trocar site bleeding. These secondary outcomes are viewed to be of less clinical importance.Large, well-conducted observational studies are necessary to answer the questions addressed in this review because serious complications, such as visceral or vascular injury, are extremely rare. However, for other outcomes, such as trocar site herniation, bleeding or infection, large observational studies may be needed as well. In order to answer these questions, it is advisable to establish an international network for recording these types of complications following laparoscopic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire F la Chapelle
- Leiden University Medical Centre, K6-76, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, 2333 ZA, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|