Reply to: “Groin hernia repair, surgeon volume and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs)”

Problem-solving skills training in adult cancer survivors: Bright IDEAS-AC pilot study

PURPOSE

Cancer patients experience significant distress and burden of decision-making throughout treatment and beyond. These stressors can interfere with their ability to make reasoned and timely decisions about their care and lead to low physical and social functioning and poor survival. This pilot study examined the impact of offering Problem-Solving Skills Training (PSST) to adult cancer survivors to help them and their caregivers cope more successfully with post-treatment decision-making burden and distress.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty patients who completed their definitive treatment for colorectal, breast or prostate cancer within the last 6 months and reported distress (level > 2 on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network distress thermometer) were randomly assigned to either care as usual (CAU) or 8 weekly PSST sessions. Patients were invited to include a supportive other (n = 17). Patient and caregiver assessments at baseline (T1), end of intervention or 3 months (T2), and at 6 months (T3) focused on problem-solving skills, anxiety/depression, quality of life and healthcare utilization. We compared outcomes by study arm and interviewed participants about PSST burden and skill maintenance.

RESULTS

Trial participation rate was 60%; 76% of the participants successfully completed PSST training. PSST patients reported reduction in anxiety/depression, improvement in QoL (p < 0.05) and lower use of hospital and emergency department services compared to CAU patients (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence from this pilot study indicates that a remotely delivered PSST is a feasible and potentially effective strategy to improve mood and self-management in cancer survivors in community oncology settings.

Explaining variation in ventral and inguinal hernia repair outcomes: A population-based analysis

BACKGROUND

No study has evaluated the relative importance of patient, surgeon, and hospital-level factors on surgeon and hospital variation in hernia reoperation rates. This population-based retrospective cohort study evaluated factors associated with variation in reoperation rates for recurrence after initial ventral hernia repair and inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System identified initial ventral hernia repairs and inguinal hernia repairs in New York state from 2003-2009. Mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed assessing factors associated with surgeon/hospital variation in 5-year reoperation rates for hernia recurrence.

RESULTS

Among 78,267 ventral hernia repairs and 124,416 inguinal hernia repairs, the proportion of total variation in reoperation rates attributable to individual surgeons compared with hospitals was 87% for ventral hernia repairs and 92% for inguinal hernia repairs. In explaining variation in ventral hernia repair reoperation between surgeons, 19% was attributable to patient-level factors, 4% attributable to mesh placement, and 10% attributable to surgeon volume and type of board certification. In explaining variation in inguinal hernia repair reoperation between surgeons, 1.1% was attributable to mesh placement and 10% was attributable to surgeon volume and years of experience. However, 67% of the variation between surgeons for ventral hernia repair and 89% of the variation between surgeons for inguinal hernia repair remained unexplained by factors in the models.

CONCLUSION

The majority of variation in hernia reoperation rates is attributable to surgeon-level variation. This suggests that hernia recurrence may be an appropriate surgeon quality metric. While modifiable factors such as mesh placement and surgeon characteristics play roles in surgeon variation, future research should focus on identifying additional surgeon attributes responsible for this variation.