Do hepatic-sided tumors require more extensive resection than peritoneal-sided tumors in patients with T2 gallbladder cancer? Results of a retrospective multicenter study

Impact of longitudinal tumor location on postoperative outcomes in gallbladder cancer: Fundus and body vs. neck and cystic duct, a retrospective multicenter study

Backgrounds/Aims

Systematic investigations into the prognostic impact of the longitudinal tumor location in gallbladder cancer (GBC) remain insufficient. To address the limitations of our pilot study, we conducted a multicenter investigation to clarify the impact of the longitudinal tumor location on the oncological outcomes of GBC.

Methods

A retrospective multicenter study was conducted on 372 patients undergoing radical resections for GBC from January 2010 to December 2019 across seven hospitals that belong to the Daejeon-Chungcheong branch of the Korean Association of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. Patients were divided into GBC in the fundus/body (FB-GBC) and GBC in the neck/cystic duct (NC-GBC) groups, based on the longitudinal tumor location.

Results

Of 372 patients, 282 had FB-GBC, while 90 had NC-GBC. NC-GBC was associated with more frequent elevation of preoperative carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 levels, requirement for more extensive surgery, more advanced histologic grade and tumor stages, more frequent lymphovascular and perineural invasion, lower R0 resection rates, higher recurrence rates, and worse 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates. Propensity score matching analysis confirmed these findings, showing lower R0 resection rates, higher recurrence rates, and worse survival rates in the NC-GBC group. Multivariate analysis identified elevated preoperative CA 19-9 levels, lymph node metastasis, and non-R0 resection as independent prognostic factors, but not longitudinal tumor location.

Conclusions

NC-GBC exhibits more frequent elevation of preoperative CA 19-9 levels, more advanced histologic grade and tumor stages, lower R0 resection rates, and poorer overall and disease-free survival rates, compared to FB-GBC. However, the longitudinal tumor location was not analyzed as an independent prognostic factor.

Research progress on prognostic factors of gallbladder carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder carcinoma is the most common malignant tumor of the biliary system, and has a poor overall prognosis. Poor prognosis in patients with gallbladder carcinoma is associated with the aggressive nature of the tumor, subtle clinical symptoms, ineffective adjuvant treatment, and lack of reliable biomarkers.

PURPOSE

Therefore, evaluating the prognostic factors of patients with gallbladder carcinoma can help improve diagnostic and treatment methods, allowing for tailored therapies that could benefit patient survival.

METHODS

This article systematically reviews the factors affecting the prognosis of gallbladder carcinoma, with the aim of evaluating prognostic risk in patients.

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive and in-depth understanding of prognostic indicators affecting patient survival is helpful for assessing patient survival risk and formulating personalized treatment plans.

Radical cholecystectomy without liver resection for peritoneal side early incidental gallbladder cancer

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. Simple cholecystectomy may be an adequate treatment only for very early disease (Tis, T1a), whereas reoperation is recommended for more advanced disease (T1b and T2). Radical cholecystectomy should have two fundamental objectives: To radically resect the liver parenchyma and to achieve adequate clearance of the lymph nodes. However, recent studies have shown that compared with lymph node dissection alone, liver resection does not improve survival outcomes. The oncological roles of lymphadenectomy and liver resection is distinct. Therefore, for patients with incidental GBC without liver invasion, hepatic resection is not always mandatory.

Accuracy of preoperative T2 gallbladder tumor localization and the adequate surgical resection

INTRODUCTION

The agreement between the radiologic and histopathologic tumor locations in T2 gallbladder cancer is critical. There is no consensus regarding the extent of curative resection by tumor locations.

METHODS

Between January 2010 and December 2019, a consecutive series of 118 patients with pathological T2 gallbladder cancer who underwent surgery were retrospectively analyzed in terms of the accordance between radiologic and histopathologic tumor locations, the extents of hepatic resection and the numbers of harvested lymph nodes. Radical resection was defined as liver resection with harvesting of at least four lymph nodes.

RESULTS

The accuracy of preoperative tumor localization was only 68%. After radical resection, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 59.4%; after nonradical resection, the figure was 46.1% (p = 0.092). In subanalyses, the 5-year OS was marginally better for patients who underwent liver resection or from whom at least four lymph nodes were harvested than those who did not undergo liver resection or from whom three or fewer lymph nodes were harvested (58.2% vs. 39.4%, p = 0.072; 59.9% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.072, respectively). In patients with peritoneal side tumor, the 5-year OSs of those who did and did not undergo liver resection were 67% and 41.2%, respectively (p = 0.028). In multivariate analysis, perineural invasion and radical resection were independently prognostic of OS.

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of preoperative tumor localization was 68%. Hepatic resection, lymph node dissection harvesting of at least four lymph nodes are required for curative resection for gallbladder cancer, regardless of tumor location.

Gallbladder cancer: surgical treatment, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy

Gallbladder cancer is a common type of biliary tract tumor. Optimal management for early stage cases typically involves radical excision as the primary treatment modality. Various surgical techniques, including laparoscopic, robotic, and navigational surgery, have demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes in radical gallbladder excision. Unfortunately, most patients are ineligible for surgical intervention because of the advanced stage of the disease upon diagnosis. Consequently, non-surgical interventions, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy, have become the mainstay of treatment for patients in advanced stages. This review focuses on elucidating various surgical techniques as well as advancements in immunotherapy and targeted therapy in the context of recent advancements in gallbladder cancer research.

Controversies and future directions in the management of gallbladder cancer

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare malignancy worldwide, with 140,000 new patients each year and more than 100,000 deaths annually. The review aims to address the controversial aspects of managing GBC. Regional differences of the study worldwide remain pending, and comparative mutational profiles will provide more information on the pathogenesis of GBC. However, certain pathologic aspects are discussed, such as the staging of early GBC, outcome differences between T2 pathologically staged patients, and the necessity of a uniform pathologic report. The surgical management of GBC is still under debate. The extent of liver resection, type of lymphadenectomy, and selection of patients for extended resection are aspects of the disease that require revision. Laparoscopic and robotic approaches were initially slow to develop. However, with time, they have demonstrated their value in the surgical management of GBC. The OMEGA survey, performed to analyze the management practice of surgical treatment of GBC worldwide, demonstrated differences from the recommended guidelines. The OMEGA study, the largest cohort study, examined the outcomes of surgical intervention in 3676 patients from 133 centers. Regarding future directions, the value of collaborative efforts between centers and regions must be emphasized to better understand the different aspects of the disease and globally improve therapeutic strategies for GBC.

Effects of Cystic Duct Margin Involvement on the Survival Rates of Patients With Gallbladder Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Case-Control Study

Background In gallbladder cancer (GBC), extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) resection is selectively performed if gross direct extension or microscopic involvement of the cystic duct margin (CDM) is detected. Although CDM is usually sent for frozen biopsy intraoperatively in most centers, there are no studies regarding the routine use of CDM frozen biopsy irrespective of the tumor location and paucity of literature regarding the impact of CDM status on recurrence-free and overall survival in GBC. The presence of obstructive jaundice in GBC usually indicates the involvement of EHBD or cystic duct-bile duct junction. The present study aimed to analyze the necessity of routine CDM frozen biopsy in patients with resectable GBC without jaundice, regardless of the tumor location. The impact of positive CDM on survival was also evaluated. Methods This retrospective observational case-control study was conducted from May 2009 to March 2021 and included 105 patients with resectable GBC without macroscopic EHBD infiltration and jaundice. Patients were divided into CDM-negative (n=91) and CDM-positive (n=14) groups. Propensity score matching was performed for variables such as performance status, tumor size, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy. After propensity score matching, 27 patients (CDM-negative=13, CDM-positive=14) were included. The primary outcome was to analyze the role of routine CDM frozen biopsy regardless of tumor location, and secondary outcomes were to study the impact of positive CDM status on survival and evaluate predictive factors for CDM positivity. A subgroup analysis was conducted to assess clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of the anatomical location of the tumor. Results Of 105 patients, 91 had negative CDM, and 14 had positive CDM. Among 14 patients with positive CDM, only one patient had a tumor in the fundus/body, and the remaining had a tumor involving the neck. All CDM-positive patients underwent bile duct excision with hepaticojejunostomy. Common bile duct (CBD) involvement was present in 50% of patients with positive CDM in the final histopathological examination. In the matched population, patients with positive CDM had a significantly higher rate of neck tumors (p=0.001). Recurrence-free survival (24 vs. 12 months, p=0.30) and overall survival (24.5 vs. 20 months, p=0.417) were comparable between CDM-negative and CDM-positive groups, respectively. On multivariate analysis, preoperative and intraoperative tumor location were independent predictive factors for CDM positivity. On subgroup analysis, 30 patients had tumor involving the neck of the gallbladder, and the remaining 75 had at the fundus and body of the gallbladder. Neck tumors had inferior recurrence-free survival (17 vs. 30 months, p=0.012) and overall survival (24 vs. 36 months, p=0.048) compared to non-neck tumors. Conclusions Routine use of CDM frozen analysis in patients with resectable GBC without jaundice, regardless of tumor location, can be avoided. It can be selectively preferred in patients with GBC involving the neck since tumor location is found to be an independent predictive factor for CDM positivity. Positive CDM has comparable survival outcomes to negative CDM, providing a similar R0 resection rate and tumor stage. However, neck tumors have a worse prognosis than non-neck tumors.

Prognostic Effect of Liver Resection in Extended Cholecystectomy for T2 Gallbladder Cancer Revisited: A Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity Score-matched Analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of liver resection on the prognosis of T2 gallbladder cancer (GBC).

BACKGROUND

Although extended cholecystectomy [lymph node dissection (LND) + liver resection] is recommended for T2 GBC, recent studies have shown that liver resection does not improve survival outcomes relative to LND alone.

METHODS

Patients with pT2 GBC who underwent extended cholecystectomy as an initial procedure and did not reoperation after cholecystectomy at 3 tertiary referral hospitals between January 2010 and December 2020 were analyzed. Extended cholecystectomy was defined as either LND with liver resection (LND+L group) or LND only (LND group). We conducted 2:1 propensity score matching to compare the survival outcomes of the groups.

RESULTS

Of the 197 patients enrolled, 100 patients from the LND+L group and 50 from the LND group were successfully matched. The LND+L group experienced greater estimated blood loss ( P <0.001) and a longer postoperative hospital stay ( P =0.047). There was no significant difference in the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) of the 2 groups (82.7% vs 77.9%, respectively, P =0.376). A subgroup analysis showed that the 5-year DFS was similar in the 2 groups in both T substages (T2a: 77.8% vs 81.8%, respectively, P =0.988; T2b: 88.1% vs 71.5%, respectively, P =0.196). In a multivariable analysis, lymph node metastasis [hazard ratio (HR) 4.80, P =0.006] and perineural invasion (HR 2.61, P =0.047) were independent risk factors for DFS; liver resection was not a prognostic factor (HR 0.68, P =0.381).

CONCLUSIONS

Extended cholecystectomy including LND without liver resection may be a reasonable treatment option for selected T2 GBC patients.

Wedge resection versus segment IVb and V resection of the liver for T2 gallbladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

Although guidelines recommend extended cholecystectomy for T2 gallbladder cancer (GBC), the optimal hepatectomy strategy remains controversial. The study aims to compare the prognosis of T2 GBC patients who underwent wedge resection (WR) versus segment IVb and V resection (SR) of the liver.

Methods

A specific search of online databases was performed from May 2001 to February 2023. The postoperative efficacy outcomes were synthesized and meta-analyses were conducted.

Results

A total of 9 studies involving 2,086 (SR = 627, WR = 1,459) patients were included in the study. The primary outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). For DFS, the 1-year DFS was statistically higher in patients undergoing SR than WR [risk ratio (RR) = 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.02-1.13, P = 0.007]. The 3-year DFS (P = 0.95), 5-year DFS (P = 0.77), and hazard ratio (HR) of DFS (P = 0.72) were similar between the two groups. However, the 3-year OS was significantly lower in patients who underwent SR than WR [RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.82-0.99, P = 0.03]. Moreover, SR had a higher hazard HR of OS [HR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.01-1.75, P = 0.04]. No significant difference was found in 1-year (P = 0.32) and 5-year (P = 0.9) OS. For secondary outcomes, patients who received SR tended to develop postoperative complications (POC) [RR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.00-3.60, P = 0.05]. In addition, no significant differences in intrahepatic recurrence (P = 0.12) were observed.

Conclusions

In conclusion, SR can improve the prognosis of T2 GBC patients in DFS. In contrast to WR, the high HR and complications associated with SR cannot be neglected. Therefore, surgeons should evaluate the condition of the patients and take their surgical skills into account when selecting SR.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier, CRD42022362974.

Current status and progress in laparoscopic surgery for gallbladder carcinoma

Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is the most common biliary tract malignancy associated with a concealed onset, high invasiveness and poor prognosis. Radical surgery remains the only curative treatment for GBC, and the optimal extent of surgery depends on the tumor stage. Radical resection can be achieved by simple cholecystectomy for Tis and T1a GBC. However, whether simple cholecystectomy or extended cholecystectomy, including regional lymph node dissection and hepatectomy, is the standard surgical extent for T1b GBC remains controversial. Extended cholecystectomy should be performed for T2 and some T3 GBC without distant metastasis. Secondary radical surgery is essential for incidental gall-bladder cancer diagnosed after cholecystectomy. For locally advanced GBC, hepatopancreatoduodenectomy may achieve R0 resection and improve long-term survival outcomes, but the extremely high risk of the surgery limits its implementation. Laparoscopic surgery has been widely used in the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies. GBC was once regarded as a contraindication of laparoscopic surgery. However, with improvements in surgical instruments and skills, studies have shown that laparoscopic surgery will not result in a poorer prognosis for selected patients with GBC compared with open surgery. Moreover, laparoscopic surgery is associated with enhanced recovery after surgery since it is minimally invasive.

The Significance of Tumor Locations in Patients with Gallbladder Carcinoma After Curative-Intent Resection

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the significance of tumor locations in patients with resected gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) and to supply the indication of extra-hepatic bile duct resection (EHBDR) according to tumor locations.

METHODS

Patients with resected GBC from 2010 to 2020 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Comparative analyses and a meta-analysis were performed according to different tumor locations (body/fundus/neck/cystic duct).

RESULTS

Article: A total of 259 patients were identified (neck: 71; cystic: 29; body: 51; fundus: 108). Patients with proximal tumors (neck/cystic duct) were often in a more advanced stage and had more aggressive tumor biological features as well as a worse prognosis compared with those with distal tumors (fundus/body). Moreover, the observation was even more obvious between cystic duct and non-cystic duct tumors. Cystic duct tumor was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (P = 0.01). EHBDR provided no survival advantage even in those with cystic duct tumor.

META-ANALYSIS

With our own cohort incorporated, five studies with 204 patients with proximal tumors and 5167 patients with distal tumors were identified. Pooled results revealed that proximal tumors indicated worse tumor biological features and prognosis versus distal tumors.

CONCLUSION

Proximal GBC had more aggressive tumor biological features, and a worse prognosis versus distal GBC and cystic duct tumor can be regarded as an independent prognostic factor. EHBDR had no obvious survival advantage even in those with cystic duct tumor and was even harmful in those with distal tumors. Upcoming more powerful well-designed studies are required for further validation.

Subserosal vascular density predicts oncological features of T2 gallbladder cancer

PURPOSE

Tumor sidedness (hepatic side vs. peritoneal side) reportedly predicts microvascular invasion and survival outcomes of T2 gallbladder cancer, although the actual histopathological mechanism is not fully understood.

METHODS

The clinical relevance of tumor sidedness was revisited in 84 patients with gallbladder cancer using histopathological analysis of the vascular density of the gallbladder wall.

RESULTS

Hepatic-side tumor location was associated with overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR], 13.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.09-88.93) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR, 8.70; 95% CI, 1.36-55.69) in T2 tumors. The Adjusted Kaplan-Meier curve indicated a clear survival difference between T2a (peritoneal side) and T2b (hepatic side) tumors (P = 0.006). A review of 56 pathological specimens with gallbladder cancer and 20 control specimens demonstrated that subserosal vascular density was significantly higher on the hepatic side of the gallbladder, regardless of the presence of cancer (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis also confirmed that higher subserosal vascular density was significantly associated with poor OS (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.10-2.73 per 10 microscopic fields) and poor RFS (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.06-2.49) in T2  gallbladder cancer.

CONCLUSION

Higher subserosal vascular density may account for the higher incidence of cancer spread and the poor prognosis of T2b gallbladder cancer.

Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes for T2 Gallbladder Cancer According to the Type of Surgery Performed and the Optimal Timing for Sequential Extended Cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Sequential extended cholecystectomy (SEC) is currently recommended for T2 and higher gallbladder cancer (GBC) diagnosed after simple cholecystectomy (SC), but the value and timing of re-resection has not been fully studied. We evaluated the long-term oncologic outcomes of T2 GBC according to the type of surgery performed and investigated the optimal timing for SEC.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with T2 GBC who underwent SC, extended cholecystectomy (EC), or SEC between 2002 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Those who underwent other surgical procedures or those with incomplete medical records were excluded. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) according to the types of surgeries and prognostic factors for OS and DFS were analyzed. Survival analysis was done between groups that were divided according to the optimal cutoff time interval between SC and SEC based on DFS data.

RESULTS

Of the 226 T2 GBC patients, 53, 173, and 44 underwent SC, EC, and SEC, respectively. The 5-year OS rate was 50.1%, 73.2%, and 78.7%, and the DFS rate was 46.8%, 66.3%, and 65.2% in the SC, EC, and SEC groups, respectively. EC (p = 0.001 and p = 0.001) and SEC (p = 0.007 and p = 0.065) groups had better 5-year OS and DFS rates than the SC group. Preoperative CA 19-9 level > 37 U/mL (HR 1.56; 95% CI 1.87-2.79; p < 0.001) and N1 stage (HR 2.88; 95% CI 1.76-4.71; p < 0.001) were associated with poorer prognosis. The optimal cutoff interval between SC and SEC was 28 days. Patients who underwent SEC ≤ 28 days after the initial cholecystectomy had better 5-year DFS rates than patients who underwent SEC after > 28 days (75.0% vs. 52.8%, p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

SEC is recommended for T2 GBC diagnosed after SC, because SEC provides better survival outcomes than SC alone. A time interval of less than 28 days to SEC is associated with an improved DFS.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of survival outcomes in T2a and T2b gallbladder cancers

BACKGROUND

The 8th edition of AJCC TNM staging of Gallbladder cancer subdivided T2 stage into T2a and T2b based on tumour location. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes in T2a and T2b gallbladder cancers.

METHODS

Literature search of Medline, Web of science, Embase and Cochrane databases was performed. Study characteristics, survival and recurrence data were extracted for meta-analysis of effect estimates and of individual patient data.

RESULTS

Fifteen retrospective studies (2531 patients, T2a = 1332, T2b = 199) were included in the meta-analysis. Overall survival (OS) was significantly worse in patients with T2b compared to T2a tumours (HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.67-2.86, p < 0.0001). Meta-analysis of individual patient data (n = 629) showed similar results (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.43-2.58, p < 0.00001). Patients with T2b tumours had higher risk of recurrence compared to T2a (OR 3.19, 95% CI 1.40-7.28, p = 0.006) and were more likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.12-2.84, p = 0.014). Liver resection improved OS in T2b tumours (HR 2.99, CI 1.73-5.16, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

T2b gallbladder tumours have worse overall survival and increase risk of recurrence compared to T2a. Liver resection appears to improve OS in patients with T2b tumours. However, high quality multicenter data is required to confirm these results.

Incidental gallbladder cancer diagnosis confers survival advantage irrespective of tumour stage and characteristics

BACKGROUND

Incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC) represents 50%-60% of gallbladder cancer cases. Data are conflicting on the role of IGBC diagnosis in oncological outcomes. Some studies suggest that IGBC diagnosis does not affect outcomes, while others that overall survival (OS) is longer in these cases compared to non-incidental diagnosis (NIGBC). Furthermore, some studies reported early tumour stages and histopathologic characteristics as possible confounders, while others not.

AIM

To investigate the role of IGBC diagnosis on patients’ overall survival, especially after surgical treatment with curative intent.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all patient referrals with gallbladder cancer between 2008 and 2020 in a tertiary hepatobiliary centre. Statistical comparison of patient and tumour characteristics between IGBC and NIGBC subgroups was performed. Survival analysis for the whole cohort, surgical and non-surgical subgroups was done with the Kaplan-Meier method and the use of log rank test. Risk analysis was performed with univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

The cohort included 261 patients with gallbladder cancer. 65% of cases had NIGBC and 35% had IGBC. A total of 90 patients received surgical treatment (66% of IGBC cases and 19% of NIGBC cases). NIGBC patients had more advanced T stage and required more extensive resections than IGBC ones. OS was longer in patients with IGBC in the whole cohort (29 vs 4 mo, P < 0.001), as well as in the non-surgical (14 vs 2 mo, P < 0.001) and surgical subgroups (29 vs 16.5 mo, P = 0.001). Disease free survival (DFS) after surgery was longer in patients with IGBC (21.5 mo vs 8.5 mo, P = 0.007). N stage and resection margin status were identified as independent predictors of OS and DFS. NIGBC diagnosis was identified as an independent predictor of OS.

CONCLUSION

IGBC diagnosis may confer a survival advantage independently of the pathological stage and tumour characteristics. Prospective studies are required to further investigate this, including detailed pathological analysis and molecular gene expression.

Survival Predictors of Resectable Gallbladder Carcinoma: An Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database

Background

To analyze population-level data for resectable gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) according to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system.

Methods

We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to identify all patients aged 18 years or older with T1-3 M0 GBC diagnosed between 2004 and 2015. Multivariate cox hazard regression analysis was used to identify prognostic factors of cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Results

Of the 1601 eligible patients, 1310 (81.8%) underwent cholecystectomy only and 291 (18.2%) underwent an en bloc resection. Overall, 219 (13.7%) patients were in stage I, 400 (25%) were in stage II, 260 (16.2%) were in stage IIIA, 653 (40.8%) were in stage IIIB, and 69 (4.3%) were in stage IVB. The 5-year survival rates for patients were 82.7% for stage I, 73.4% for stage II, 31.9% for stage IIIA, 24.1% for stage IIIB, and 10% for stage IVB. Multivariate cox analysis indicated that predictors of decreased CSS included age at diagnosis >65 years, tumor size >3.2 cm, adenocarcinoma, increasing tumor spread, and lymph node involvement. Besides, chemotherapy and radiation were predictors of increased CSS.

Conclusions

Older age, increasing tumor size, adenocarcinoma, and advanced tumor/node stage were associated with a poorer prognosis after resection for GBC. Furthermore, patients with resectable GBC can benefit from adjuvant therapy.

Comparing survival rate and appropriate surgery methods according to tumor location in T2 gallbladder cancer

BACKGROUND

The survival outcomes and optimal extent of surgery of T2 gallbladder cancers remain controversial. We aimed to investigate the difference in overall/disease-free survival rates and assess the prognosis of T2 gallbladder cancers.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records of 147 patients who underwent surgical resection for pathologically confirmed T2 gallbladder cancer between January 2003 and December 2012. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the tumor location (T2a vs. T2b) and three groups according to surgery method (simple cholecystectomy, cholecystectomy with lymph node dissection, and extended cholecystectomy). We compared the overall and disease-free survival rates according to T2 subgroups and surgery methods. Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to evaluate prognostic factors for the overall survival of T2 gallbladder cancer.

RESULTS

Of all patients, 40 (27.2%) and 107 (72.8%) were diagnosed with T2a and T2b gallbladder cancers, respectively. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 75.0% vs. 73.8% (p = 0.653) and 72.5% vs. 70.1% (p = 0.479) in T2a and T2b gallbladder cancers, respectively. There was no difference in the survival rate among T2a gallbladder cancer according to the surgery method. However, in T2b gallbladder cancer, extended cholecystectomy showed a better overall survival than simple cholecystectomy and cholecystectomy with lymph node dissection groups (p = 0.043 and p = 0.003, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no difference in overall and disease-free survival rates according to the location of T2 gallbladder cancers. Extended cholecystectomy increases overall survival rate, especially in T2b gallbladder cancers.

Approach to Resectable Biliary Cancers

OPINION STATEMENT

Biliary malignancies, although rare, can be some of the most challenging to manage surgically. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas are resectable if there is no evidence of metastatic disease. These tumors are managed with anatomic resection and portal lymphadenectomy when centrally located or multiple in a single lobe. Non-anatomic resection can be performed for solitary peripheral tumors with minimally invasive techniques. It is not our practice to routinely employ neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to resection of these tumors. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy is utilized at our institution in highly selected patients in the context of an ongoing clinical trial for unresectable tumors. Hilar cholangiocarcinomas, when resectable (i.e., ipsilateral arterial involvement or lack of vascular involvement), are managed with right or left (extended) hepatectomy, caudate resection, and portal lymphadenectomy. Distal cholangiocarcinomas are managed with pancreaticoduodenectomy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not routinely used in our treatment algorithm of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. Nodal involvement and positive margin (R1) resection necessitates adjuvant chemotherapy. Finally, gallbladder carcinoma is managed with radical cholecystectomy, anatomic segment IVb/V resection, and portal lymphadenectomy. Adjuvant chemotherapy is employed routinely amongst patients with T2 or higher tumors and those with positive lymph nodes.

Tumor location and concurrent liver resection, impact survival in T2 gallbladder cancer: a meta-analysis of the literature

Aim of doing this review was to give a uniform consensus on prognostic impact of tumor location (hepatic vs peritoneal), liver resection and adjuvant chemotherapy in gall bladder cancer and, to compare them with previous well-studied factors of survival. We systematically review PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane for relevant articles with no date restrictions, language was restricted to English. Those articles were included that had provided Hazard ratio (HR) of survival for T2 gall bladder cancer. We identified nine retrospective studies published between 2014 and 2020 with 2345 patients. Meta-analysis showed that T2b (hepatic) cancers had higher odds of mortality (HR 3.16 [2.11, 4.74], I² = 0%). Liver resection was associated with significantly higher odds of 5-year overall survival only in T2b (2.20 [1.33, 3.63], I² = 67%), adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with any significant decrease in mortality risk (0.98 [0.83-1.16]. I² = 20%). Hepatic sided gall bladder tumors carry higher odds for mortality and recurrence. T2a tumors can be managed without hepatic resection. To risk stratify patients we also formulated a scoring system for mortality risk.

Clinical Outcomes Between a Minimally Invasive and Open Extended Cholecystectomy for T2 Gallbladder Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Background: Although a minimally invasive extended cholecystectomy (MIEC) for T2 gallbladder cancer (T2 GBC) has been performed in many experienced centers, no oncologic comparison with open extended cholecystectomy (OEC) has yet been reported. Methods: T2 GBC patients who underwent MIEC (n = 60) or OEC (n = 135) were enrolled. We used propensity score matching (PSM) using pre- and intraoperative variables. Short- and long-term outcomes were then compared before and after PSM. Results: Before PSM, OEC patients more frequently showed completion of surgery after a simple cholecystectomy (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.551), and lymph node enlargement on preoperative computed tomography (SMD = -0.471). PSM was used to select 56 patients from each of the 2 patient groups. MIEC patients showed comparable complication rate (7.1% versus 12.5%, P = .365) and shorter hospital stay (5.7 days versus 9.8 days, P < .001). The median follow-up period was 26.2 months, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (96.8% versus 91.1%, P = .464) and 5-year recurrence free survival (RFS) (54.7% versus 44.4%, P = .580) outcomes were still comparable between MIEC and OEC groups. Conclusion: MIEC have advantages such as early recovery and comparable short-term outcomes compared with OEC. MIEC showed comparable OS and RFS outcomes compared with OEC. MIEC is a safe option without oncological compromise for T2 GBC.

Radical Resection Versus Simple Cholecystectomy for Gallbladder Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to review relevant randomized controlled trials or case-control studies to determine radical resection compared with simple cholecystectomy for gallbladder carcinoma.

METHODS

Using appropriate keywords, we identified relevant studies using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase. Key pertinent sources in the literature were also reviewed, and all articles published through September 2019 were considered for inclusion. For each study, we assessed odds ratios, mean difference, and 95% confidence interval (CI) to assess and synthesize outcomes.

RESULTS

We included 19 studies with a total of 1791 patients in the radical resection group and 3014 in the simple cholecystectomy group. Compared with simple cholecystectomy, radical resection significantly improved the 5-year disease-free survival rate [relative risk (RR): 1.36, 95% CI: 1.02-1.81], the 1-year overall survival (OS) rate (RR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.04-1.54), and the 3-year OS rate (RR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.02-2.85). However, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate (RR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.87-1.23), and in the 5-year OS rate (RR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.92-1.19) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with simple cholecystectomy, radical resection has advantages in improving the 5-year disease-free survival rate, and the 1- and 3-year OS rate of gallbladder carcinoma patients.

Prognostic Significance of Tumor Location in T2 Gallbladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

(1) Background: The AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, Eighth Edition, subdivided T2 GBC into T2a and T2b. However, there still exist a lack of evidence on the prognostic significance of tumor location. The aim of the present study was to examine the existing evidence to determine the prognostic significance of tumor location of T2 gallbladder cancer (GBC) and to evaluate the optimal surgical extent according to tumor location. (2) Methods: We searched for relevant literature published in the electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase before September 2020 using search terms related to gallbladder, cancer, and stage. Data were weighted and pooled using random-effects modeling. (3) Results: Seven studies were deemed eligible for inclusion, representing a cohort of 1789 cases of resected T2 GBC. The overall survival for T2b tumor was significantly worse than that for T2a tumor (HR, 2.141; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.140 to 4.023; I² = 71.4%; P_chⁱ² = 0.007). The rate of lymph node metastasis was lower in the T2a group (26.6%) than in the T2b group (36.6%) (OR, 2.164; 95% CI, 1.309 to 3.575). There was no evidence of a survival difference between the patients who underwent extended cholecystectomy and simple cholecystectomy in T2a GBC (OR, 0.802; 95% CI, 0.618 to 1.042) and T2b GBC (OR, 0.820; 95% CI, 0.620 to 1.083). (4) Conclusions: Hepatic side tumor was a significant poor prognostic factor in T2 GBC. Extended cholecystectomy and simple cholecystectomy showed comparable survival outcomes in T2 GBC, and additional large-scale prospective studies are warranted to establish evidence-based treatment guidelines for T2 GBC.

Quality Assessment of Gallbladder Cancer Pathology Reports: A Dutch Nationwide Study

Simple Summary

Appropriate reporting of pathological findings is required for optimal patient care and to perform high-quality research. The aim of our study was to assess the completeness of pathology reports of gallbladder cancer (GBC) in a large nation-wide patient cohort from the Netherlands. Results showed that reports were often incomplete; information on essential items that can predict prognosis were often missing. Whereas certain items were often missing in the report, they could be retrospectively detected in a large proportion of patients during pathology review. Our findings showed that significant improvements could be made in the reporting of gallbladder cancer in the Netherlands. To this end, the added value of standardized (synoptic) reporting should be explored, of which the beneficial effects have already been demonstrated in other tumor types.

Abstract

Adequate reporting of pathological findings is essential for optimal patient management and to perform high-quality research. The aim of this study was to assess the completeness of pathology reports of gallbladder cancer (GBC) at the nationwide level to assess guideline adherence and make recommendations for improvement. A retrospective population-based cohort of GBC patients diagnosed in the Netherlands from 2000 to 2019 was collected using data from the Dutch Cancer Registry and the nationwide network and registry of histology. Pathology reports were scored on the presence and content of essential and optional items according to the Dutch consensus-based guideline on biliary tract cancer. By histopathological review of cases, we compared findings with the conclusion of the corresponding pathology report. All pathology reports (n = 849) had a narrative, nonstructured format. Overall completeness was low. Information on key prognostic factors, such as tumor side (hepatic vs. serosal), status of cystic duct and liver surgical margins and venous and perineural invasion, was frequently lacking (80%, 23%, 59%, 74% and 74% missing, respectively). Whereas certain items were often missing from the report, they could be retrospectively detected in a substantial proportion of cases during pathology review (n = 738). In conclusion, significant improvements could be made in the reporting of GBC in the Netherlands. Synoptic reporting could greatly enhance the completeness of reports, as already demonstrated for tumor types.

The optimal extent of surgery in T2 gallbladder cancer and the need for hepatectomy: A meta-analysis

Extensive surgery is the mainstay treatment for gallbladder cancer and offers a long-term survival benefits to the patients. However, the optimal extent of surgery remains debatable. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis of hepatectomy and no hepatectomy approaches in patients with T2 gallbladder cancer. We searched the following electronic databases for systematic literature: PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library. We selected studies that compared patients with T2 gallbladder cancer who underwent hepatectomy with those who did not. While the long-term overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were the primary outcomes, perioperative morbidity and mortality were the secondary outcome. We analysed over 18 studies with 4,587 patients. Of the total patients, 1,683 and 1,303 patients underwent hepatectomy and no hepatectomy, respectively. The meta-analysis revealed no significant difference between the hepatectomy and no hepatectomy groups, in terms of the overall morbidity (risk ratio [RR] = 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.66-5.20) and 30-day mortality (RR = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.1-8.2). The results were comparable in terms of the OS (RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.57-1.01), (HR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.49-1.12), and DFS (RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.88-1.11). In conclusion, the perioperative and long-term outcomes of hepatectomy and no hepatectomy approaches were comparable. Hepatectomy may not be required in T2 gall bladder cancer if the preoperative evaluation confirms the depth of the tumour in the perimuscular connective tissue and the intraoperative frozen sections confirm microscopic negative margins. Likewise, for those whom gall bladder cancer was diagnosed from the pathological report after simple cholecystectomy, further hepatectomy may not necessary.

Anatomic location of residual disease after initial cholecystectomy independently determines outcomes after re-resection for incidental gallbladder cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to elucidate the impact of anatomic location of residual disease (RD) after initial cholecystectomy on survival following re-resection of incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC).

METHODS

Patients with pT2 or pT3 gallbladder cancer (36 with IGBC and 171 with non-IGBC) who underwent resection were analyzed. Patients with IGBC were classified as follows according to the anatomic location of RD after initial cholecystectomy: no RD (group 1); RD in the gallbladder bed, stump of the cystic duct, and/or regional lymph nodes (group 2); and RD in the extrahepatic bile duct and/or distant sites (group 3).

RESULTS

Timing of resection (IGBC vs. non-IGBC) did not affect survival in either multivariate or propensity score matching analysis. RD was found in 16 (44.4%) of the 36 patients with IGBC; R0 resection following re-resection was achieved in 32 patients (88.9%). Overall survival (OS) following re-resection was worse in group 3 (n = 7; 5-year OS, 14.3%) than in group 2 (n = 9; 5-year OS, 55.6%) (p = 0.035) or in group 1 (n = 20; 5-year OS, 88.7%) (p < 0.001). There was no survival difference between groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.256). Anatomic location of RD was independently associated with OS (group 2, HR 2.425, p = 0.223; group 3, HR 9.627, p = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

The anatomic location of RD independently predicts survival following re-resection, which is effective for locoregional disease control in IGBC, similar to resection for non-IGBC. Not all patients with RD have poor survival following re-resection for IGBC.

Applicability of sentinel lymph node oriented treatment strategy for gallbladder cancer

BACKGROUND

Utility of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in some malignancies has been reported, however, research on that of gallbladder cancer (GBC) is rare. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the concept of SLN is applicable to T2/3 GBC.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients who underwent resection for gallbladder cancer were enrolled in this study. Patients with GBC were stratified into two groups based on the location of tumor, peritoneal-side (T2p or 3p) and hepatic-side (T2h or 3h) groups. We evaluated the relationship between cystic duct node (CDN) and downstream lymph node (LN) status. CDN was defined as a SLN in this study.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were classified into T2, including T2p (n = 18) and T2h (n = 20), and 42 patients into T3, including T3p (n = 22) andT3h (n = 20). The incidence of LN metastasis was significantly higher in hepatic-side than peritoneal-side in both T2 and T3 (P = 0.036 and 0.009, respectively). In T2, 14 T2p had negative CDN and downstream LN, however, three T2h had negative CDN and positive downstream LNs (defined as a skipped LN metastasis) (P = 0.043). In T3, patients with skipped LN metastasis were significantly higher in T3h (n = 11) than those in T3p (n = 2) (P<0.001). There was no recurrence of the local lymph node. Disease-free survival in the T2p and T3p were significantly better than those in the T2h and T3h (P = 0.005 and 0.025, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The concept of SLN can be applicable to T2p GBC, where the downstream LNs dissection can be omitted.

The significance of anatomic tumor location in gallbladder cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Current management guidelines recognize the impact of hepatic versus peritoneal sided gallbladder cancers (GBC) on survival. However, no data exist regarding the significance of anatomic tumor location within the gallbladder.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all GBC that underwent surgical resection with curative intent in our health system from 2007 to 2017. We evaluated the effect of anatomic pathologic tumor location (fundus/body, neck, and multifocal) on clinicopathologic, perioperative, and oncologic outcomes.

RESULTS

About 97 patients met criteria; 63% fundus/body, 22% multifocal, and 15% neck. Compared with fundus/body, neck tumors more frequently presented with preoperative jaundice (53% vs. 13%, p < .001), were smaller (20 mm vs. 30 mm, p = .068) and had significantly more biliary tree invasion (33% vs. 13%, p = .030) on histopathology. Although tumor characteristics (pTNM stage, liver invasion, lymphovascular invasion, prognostic nutritional index, and grade) were similar, neck tumors had significantly higher rates of R0 resection (53% vs. 11%, p < .001). Rates of adjuvant therapy were similar. Median PFS was similar between cohorts (p = .356). However, median overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter in neck (21 months) than fundus/body tumors (NR > 109 months), p = .015.

CONCLUSIONS

Neck tumors were rare, small and more likely to result in jaundice secondary to biliary tree invasion. Despite higher R0 resection rates, these tumors had significantly worse OS.

Causes of misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis and therapeutic and preventive strategies for unexpected gallbladder carcinoma

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been widely used in the treatment of gallbladder diseases. Since the indications for operation are constantly expanding, the intraoperative or postoperative incidence of unexpected gallbladder carcinoma (UGC) is gradually increasing. The incidence of UGC in LC and open cholecystectomy is 2.09% and 0.91%, respectively. Because gallbladder carcinoma is often accompanied by gallstones or inflammation and lacks specific clinical manifestations, imaging features, and specific serum tumor markers, the preoperative diagnostic rate of gallbladder carcinoma is only 30%, and 30% of cases of gallbladder carcinoma are diagnosed intraoperatively or postoperatively. Pathological T stage, lymph node metastasis, and gallbladder rupture are independent risk factors for the prognosis of patients with UGC. Preoperative imaging combined with serological tumor markers, intraoperative careful exploration, and rapid pathological examination are important measures to reduce the misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis of UGC. For patients with benign gallbladder diseases with a high potential of canceration, performing cholecystectomy in time and strictly grasping the indications for preserving gallbladder for benign gallbladder diseases are important preventive measures to reduce the incidence of UGC.

Gallbladder cancer revisited: the evolving role of a radiologist

Gallbladder cancer is the most common malignancy of the biliary tract. It is also the most aggressive biliary tumor with the shortest median survival duration. Complete surgical resection, the only potentially curative treatment, can be accomplished only in those patients who are diagnosed at an early stage of the disease. Majority (90%) of the patients present at an advanced stage and the management involves a multidisciplinary approach. The role of imaging in gallbladder cancer cannot be overemphasized. Imaging is crucial not only in detecting, staging, and planning management but also in guiding radiological interventions. This article discusses the role of a radiologist in the diagnosis and management of gallbladder cancer.

Prognostic Significance of Tumor Location in T2 Gallbladder Cancer: A Korea Tumor Registry System Biliary Pancreas (KOTUS-BP) Database Analysis

Background: T2 gallbladder cancer (GBC) is subdivided into T2a and T2b by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition. However; there is a lack of evidence for the prognostic significance of tumor location and validation with large-scale studies is needed. The aims of this study were to investigate the clinical features and clinical outcomes of T2 GBC according to tumor location and determine the prognostic significance of tumor location and an appropriate surgical strategy. Methods: Between 2000 and 2014 the Korea Tumor Registry System Biliary Pancreas (KOTUS-BP) database was used to identify and enroll a total 707 patients with pathologically diagnosed T2 GBC who underwent curative resection. Clinicopathological findings and long-term follow-up results were analyzed. Results: The incidence of lymph node metastasis in T2b was significantly higher than that of T2a tumors (37.9% vs. 29.5%, p = 0.032). The 5-year disease-specific survival of T2a was better than that of T2b tumors (74.8% vs. 65.4%, p = 0.019). There was no significant survival difference in T2a between extended cholecystectomy and simple cholecystectomy with lymph node dissection (81.8% vs. 73.7%, p = 0.361). However; there was a better survival trend for T2b tumor after extended cholecystectomy (71.7% vs. 59.3%, p = 0.057). Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved survival for patients with lymph node metastasis in T2a (72.1% vs. 56.9; p = 0.022) and in T2b (68.2 vs. 48.5; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis was the only significant poor prognostic factor (Hazard ratio 3.222; 95% confidential interval 1.960–4.489; p < 0.001). Conclusions: For T2 GBC; tumor location was not an independent prognostic factor. Lymph node metastasis was a significant poor prognostic factor and adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered for the patients with lymph node metastasis.

Role of tumour location and surgical extent on prognosis in T2 gallbladder cancer: an international multicentre study

BACKGROUND

In gallbladder cancer, stage T2 is subdivided by tumour location into lesions on the peritoneal side (T2a) or hepatic side (T2b). For tumours on the peritoneal side (T2a), it has been suggested that liver resection may be omitted without compromising the prognosis. However, data to validate this argument are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of tumour location in T2 gallbladder cancer, and to clarify the adequate extent of surgical resection.

METHODS

Clinical data from patients who underwent surgery for gallbladder cancer were collected from 14 hospitals in Korea, Japan, Chile and the USA. Survival and risk factor analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Data from 937 patients were available for evaluation. The overall 5-year disease-free survival rate was 70·6 per cent, 74·5 per cent for those with T2a and 65·5 per cent among those with T2b tumours (P = 0·028). Regarding liver resection, extended cholecystectomy was associated with a better 5-year disease-free survival rate than simple cholecystectomy (73·0 versus 61·5 per cent; P = 0·012). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was marginally better for extended than simple cholecystectomy in both T2a (76·5 versus 66·1 per cent; P = 0·094) and T2b (68·2 versus 56·2 per cent; P = 0·084) disease. Five-year disease-free survival rates were similar for extended cholecystectomies including liver wedge resection versus segment IVb/V segmentectomy (74·1 versus 71·5 per cent; P = 0·720). In multivariable analysis, independent risk factors for recurrence were presence of symptoms (hazard ratio (HR) 1·52; P = 0·002), R1 resection (HR 1·96; P = 0·004) and N1/N2 status (N1: HR 3·40, P < 0·001; N2: HR 9·56, P < 0·001). Among recurrences, 70·8 per cent were metastatic.

CONCLUSION

Tumour location was not an independent prognostic factor in T2 gallbladder cancer. Extended cholecystectomy was marginally superior to simple cholecystectomy. A radical operation should include liver resection and adequate node dissection.

Validation of the prognostic performance in various nodal staging systems for gallbladder cancer: results of a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Although the current nodal staging system for gallbladder cancer (GBC) was changed based on the number of positive lymph nodes (PLN), it needs to be evaluated in various situations.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical data for 398 patients with resected GBC and compared nodal staging systems based on the number of PLNs, the positive/retrieved LN ratio (LNR), and the log odds of positive LN (LODDS). Prognostic performance was evaluated using the C-index.

RESULTS

Subgroups were formed on the basis of an restricted cubic spline plot as follows: PLN 3 (PLN = 0, 1-2, ≥ 3); PLN 4 (PLN = 0, 1-3, ≥ 4); LNR (LNR = 0, 0-0.269, ≥ 0.27); and LODDS (LODDS < - 0.8, - 0.8-0, ≥ 0). The oncological outcome differed significantly between subgroups in each system. In all patients with GBC, PLN 4 (C-index 0.730) and PLN 3 (C-index 0.734) were the best prognostic discriminators of survival and recurrence, respectively. However, for retrieved LN (RLN) ≥ 6, LODDS was the best discriminator for survival (C-index 0.852).

CONCLUSION

The nodal staging system based on PLN was the optimal prognostic discriminator in patients with RLN < 6, whereas the LODDS system is adequate for RLN ≥ 6. The following nodal staging system considers applying different systems according to the RLN.

Essential updates to the surgical treatment of biliary tract cancer

Biliary tract cancer, which includes intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic bile duct cancer, gallbladder cancer, and ampullary cancer, is an intractable disease with a dismal prognosis. Prognosis is particularly poor in cases involving vessels or lymph nodes. Hepatobiliary pancreatic surgeons worldwide have consistently focused on improving surgical treatment, perioperative management, and chemotherapy to improve the outcomes of these diseases. There has been significant progress even in the last 2 years (2017 and 2018), such as promising findings reported by studies on the optimal extent of surgical treatment and multi-institutional randomized controlled trials on adjuvant chemotherapy. We overview the current trends and advancements made in surgical treatment in 2017 and 2018.

Improvement in the diagnosis and treatment of T2 gallbladder carcinoma is pivotal to improvement in the overall prognosis for this disease

Since the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) subdivided the T2 stage of gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) into T2a and T2b, the diagnosis and treatment of those stages have been a subject of heated discussion and controversy. T2 is a stage of GBC that might be treatable. Based on the extent of lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis, T2 GBC can be classified into various pathological stages such as IIA, IIB, IIIB, and IVB, leading to controversy in clinical settings. This review aims to discuss the effectiveness of and controversies concerning S4b+5 resection, the acceptable extent of lymph node dissection, the timing for treatment of incidental gallbladder cancer, and adjuvant therapy. This review also aims to suggest directions for and recommendations regarding clinical research in the future.

Retrospective comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery for T2 gallbladder cancer - Thirteen-year experience

BACKGROUND

The objective of this retrospective study is to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery for T2 gallbladder cancer (GBC) performed at our hospital for last 13 years.

METHODS

Of 247 GBC patients who were treated at our hospital between Apr 2004 and Apr 2017, 151 patients with pathologic stage T2 were reviewed. Patients were divided into laparoscopic surgery group (LS group) and open (OS group). Medical recordings were reviewed to check perioperative outcomes, overall survival rates, and disease free survival rates.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients in LS group and 44 in OS met the inclusion criteria. Incidences of postoperative complication were similar between two groups (12.7% vs 13.6%, p = 1.000). Average postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in LS group (5.8 vs 9.5 days, p < 0.001). LS group showed significantly higher disease free survival rate (p = 0.0171). There was no significant difference in terms of disease free survival between T2N0 (p = 0.107) and T2N1 patients (p = 0.969) of LS group and OS group. In terms of overall survival rate there was no significant difference (p = 0.116). Overall survival rate was also not significantly different between T2N0 (p = 0.0941) and T2N1 (p = 0.579) patients of LS group and OS group.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic approach for treatment of T2 GBC was comparable to open approach in terms of disease free survival, overall survival and complication rate. Further prospective study with higher number of patients should be done to confirm this result in the future.

Lymphatic spread of T2 gallbladder carcinoma: Regional lymphadenectomy is required independent of tumor location

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the incidence and distribution of regional lymph node metastasis according to tumor location, and to clarify whether tumor location could determine the extent of regional lymphadenectomy in patients with pathological T2 (pT2) gallbladder carcinoma.

METHODS

In total, 81 patients with pT2 gallbladder carcinoma (25 with pT2a tumors and 56 with pT2b tumors) who underwent radical resection were enrolled. Tumor location was determined histologically in each gallbladder specimen.

RESULTS

Survival after resection was significantly worse in patients with pT2b tumors than those with pT2a tumors (5-year survival, 72% vs. 96%; p = 0.027). Tumor location was an independent prognostic factor on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 14.162; p = 0.018). The incidence of regional lymph node metastasis was significantly higher in patients with pT2b tumors than in those with pT2a tumors (46% vs. 20%; p = 0.028). However, the number of positive nodes was similar between the two groups (median, 2 vs. 2; p = 0.910). For node-positive patients with pT2b tumors, metastasis was found in every regional node group (12%-63%), whereas even for node-positive patients with pT2a tumors, metastasis was observed in regional node groups outside the hepatoduodenal ligament.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor location in patients with pT2 gallbladder carcinoma can predict the presence or absence of regional lymph node metastasis but not the number and anatomical distribution of positive regional lymph nodes. The extent of regional lymphadenectomy should not be changed even in patients with pT2a tumors, provided that they are fit enough for surgery.

Gallbladder Cancer: Diagnosis, Surgical Management, and Adjuvant Therapies

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is an often lethal disease, but surgical resection is potentially curative. Symptoms may be misdiagnosed as biliary colic; over half of new diagnoses are made after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for presumed benign disease. Gallbladder polyps >1 cm should prompt additional imaging and cholecystectomy. For GBC diagnosed after cholecystectomy, tumors T1b and greater necessitate radical cholecystectomy. Radical cholecystectomy includes staging laparoscopy, hepatic resection, and locoregional lymph node clearance to achieve R0 resection. Patients with locally advanced disease (T3 or T4), hepatic-sided T2 tumors, node positivity, or R1 resection may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Chemotherapy increases survival in unresectable disease.

Validation of the oncologic effect of hepatic resection for T2 gallbladder cancer: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

While extended cholecystectomy is recommended for T2 gallbladder cancer (GBC), the role of hepatic resection for T2 GBC is unclear. This study aimed to identify the necessity of hepatic resection in patients with T2 GBC.

METHODS

Data of 81 patients with histopathologically proven T2 GBC who underwent surgical resection between January 1999 and December 2017 were enrolled from a retrospective database. Of these, 36 patients had peritoneal-side (T2a) tumors and 45 had hepatic-side (T2b) tumors. To identify the optimal surgical management method, T2 GBC patients were classified into the hepatic resection group (n = 44, T2a/T2b = 20/24) and non-hepatic resection group (n = 37, T2a/T2b = 16/21). The recurrence pattern and role of hepatic resection for T2 GBC were then investigated.

RESULTS

Mean age of the patients was 69 (range 36-88) years, and the male-to-female ratio was 42:39 (male, 51.9%; female, 48.1%). Hepatic-side GBC had a higher rate of recurrence than peritoneal-side GBC (44.4% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.006). The most common type of recurrence in T2a GBC was para-aortic lymph node recurrence (n = 2, 5.6%); the most common types of recurrence in T2b GBC were para-aortic lymph node recurrence (n = 7, 15.6%) and intrahepatic metastasis (n = 6, 13.3%). Hepatic-side GBC patients had worse survival outcomes than peritoneal-side GBC patients (76.0% vs. 96.6%, p = 0.041). Hepatic resection had no significant treatment effect in T2 GBC patients (p = 0.272). Multivariate analysis showed that lymph node metastasis was the only significant prognostic factor (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic resection is not essential for curative treatment in T2 GBC, and more systemic treatments are needed for GBC patients, particularly for those with T2b GBC.

National Failure of Surgical Staging for T1b Gallbladder Cancer

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend radical cholecystectomy with regional lymphadenectomy (RC-RL) for patients with T1b gallbladder cancer (GBC). However, the extent to which these guidelines are followed is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate current surgical practices for T1b GBC and their implications for overall management strategies and associated outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study investigated patients identified from the National Cancer Data Base (2004-2012) with non-metastatic T1b GBC. The patients were categorized according to type of surgical treatment received: simple cholecystectomy (SC) or RC-RL. Among the patients who had lymph nodes pathologically examined, nodal status was classified as pN- or pN+. Use of any adjuvant therapy was ascertained. Overall survival (OS) was compared based on type of surgical treatment and nodal status.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 464 patients (247 SC and 217 RC-RL cases). The positive margin status did not differ between the two groups (6.1% for SC vs 2.3% for RC-RL; p = 0.128). For RC-RL, the pN+ rate was 15%. Adjuvant therapies were used more frequently in pN+ (53.1% vs 9.4% for pN-). By comparison, 10.9% of the SC patients received adjuvant therapy. The OS for RC-RL-pN- (5-years OS, 64.4%) was significantly better than for RC-RL-pN+ (5-years OS, 15.7%) or SC (5-years OS, 48.3%) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Less than 50% of the patients with a T1b GBC primary tumor undergo the recommended surgical treatment. Given that 15% of these patients have nodal metastasis and in light of the previously described benefits of adjuvant therapy for node positive GBC, failure to perform RC-RL risks incomplete staging and thus undertreatment for patients with T1b GBC.

A retrospective analysis of patients with gallbladder cancer: surgical treatment and survival according to tumor stage

INTRODUCTION

gallbladder cancer is the most common biliary neoplasm and the sixth most common tumor of the digestive system. The disease has an ominous prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 5%. It is usually diagnosed late and surgical resection is the only potential cure.

METHODS

a retrospective study was carried out in 92 patients with a pathological diagnosis of gallbladder cancer from January 2000 to January 2016.

RESULTS

the mean age of cases was 72 ± 11 years; 64 subjects were females and 28 were males. Symptoms at admission included abdominal pain (78%), anorexia (77%), nausea (76%) and jaundice (45%). Surgery was indicated in 92 (100%) patients and 59 (64%) underwent a curative/intent resection. The initial surgical procedures included simple cholecystectomy in 69 (75%) cases and extended cholecystectomy in eleven (11%) subjects. Rescue surgery was performed in 15 patients with tumor tissue in the cholecystectomy specimen; ten individuals underwent an R0 curative resection. Adjuvant therapy was administered in 30 (33%) patients. The median survival in our series was 12.5 months, with survival rates of 57%, 30% and 20% at one, three and five years, respectively.

CONCLUSION

to conclude, surgical treatment with a complete tumor resection should be considered for all patients, provided that their clinical status allows it.