Outcomes of resection for solitary ≤5 cm intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Sex disparity in clinical characteristics and long-term prognosis after liver resection for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis

Aim

To compare the survival outcomes between male and female patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who underwent liver resection.

Methods

Data from 976 consecutive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients undergoing liver resection between January 2005 and May 2013 at the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. Patient clinicopathological characteristics, overall survival, and cumulative recurrence rates were compared between male and female patients using propensity score matching.

Results

Propensity score matching generated 313 matched pairs of patients. Among the entire cohort, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival and recurrence rates of the male and female patients were 60.2 %, 37.3 %, and 27.7 % vs. 65.8 %, 40.4 %, and 31.0 % (P = 0.380) and 50.6 %, 67.4 %, and 74.2 % vs. 44.4 %, 63.5 %, and 69.6 % (P = 0.123), respectively. In the matched cohort, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival and recurrence rates of the male and female patients were 60.6 %, 35.9 % and 22.4 % vs. 66.4 %, 40.6 % and 31.1 % (P = 0.041) and 51.5 %, 69.3 % and 83.9 % vs. 44.3 %, 63.6 %, and 69.9 % (P = 0.041), respectively. After adjustment for other confounding variables by multivariate Cox regression analysis, male sex was independently associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.322, 95 % confidence interval: 1.079-1.621, P = 0.007) and tumor recurrence (hazard ratio = 1.337, 95 % confidence interval: 1.088-1.645, P = 0.006). A subgroup analysis of patients younger than 55 years old after propensity score matching showed that male patients had significantly worse overall survival and higher recurrence rates than female patients after surgery, while no significant difference in long-term overall survival and recurrence was observed between male and female patients older than 55 years old after propensity score matching.

Conclusion

Male sex was an independent risk factor for overall survival and tumor recurrence in patients after liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Predicting risk of recurrence after resection of stage I intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Early-stage intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is often an indication of curative-intent resection. Although patients with early-stage ICC generally have a better prognosis than individuals with advanced ICC, the incidence and risk factors of recurrence after early-stage ICC remain unclear.

METHODS

A multi-institutional database was used to identify patients who underwent surgery between 2000 and 2018 for ICC with pathologically confirmed stage I disease. Cox regression analysis was used to identify clinicopathological factors associated with recurrence, and an online prediction model was developed and validated.

RESULTS

Of 430 patients diagnosed with stage I ICC, approximately one-half of patients (n = 221, 51.4%) experienced recurrence after curative-intent resection. Among patients with a recurrence, most (n = 188, 85.1%) experienced it within 12 months. On multivariable analysis, carcinoembryonic antigen (hazard ratio [HR], 1.011; 95% CI, 1.004-1.018), systemic immune-inflammation index (HR, 1.036; 95% CI, 1.019-1.056), no lymph nodes evaluated (HR, 1.851; 95% CI, 1.276-2.683), and tumor size (HR, 1.101; 95% CI, 1.053-1.151) were associated with greater hazards of recurrence. A predictive model that included these weighted risk factors demonstrated excellent prognostic discrimination in the test (12-month recurrence-free survival [RFS]: low risk, 80.1%; intermediate risk, 60.3%; high risk, 37.7%; P = .001) and validation (12-month RFS: low risk, 84.5%; intermediate risk, 63.5%; high risk, 47.1%; P = .036) datasets. The online predictive model was made available at https://ktsahara.shinyapps.io/stageI_icc/.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with stage I ICC without vascular invasion or lymph node metastasis had a relatively high incidence of recurrence. An online tool can risk stratify patients relative to recurrence risk to identify individuals best suited for alternative treatment approaches.

Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review of propensity score-matched studies

Outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) versus open LR (OLR) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA) are heterogeneous. We aimed to compare LLR and OLR for ICCA based on propensity-score-matched (PSM) studies. Two reviewers independently searched the online databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) for PSM studies that compared LLR and OLR for ICCA. The Ottawa-Newcastle Quality Assessment Scale with a cutoff of ≥ 7 was used to define higher-quality literature. Only 'high-quality' PSM analyses of the English language that met all our inclusion criteria were considered. A total of ten PSM trials were included in the analyses. Compared with OLR, although the lymph node dissection (LND) (RR = 0.67) and major hepatectomy rates were lower in the LLR group (RR = 0.87), higher R0 resections (RR = 1.05) and lower major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III) (RR = 0.72) were also observed in the LLR group. In addition, patients in the LLR group showed less estimated blood loss (MD = - 185.52 ml) and shorter hospital stays as well (MD = - 2.75 days). Further analysis found the overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.91), disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 0.95), and recurrence-free survival (HR = 0.80) for patients with ICCA after LLR were all comparable to those of OLR. LLR for selected ICCA patients may be technically safe and feasible, providing short-term benefits and achieving oncological efficacy without compromising the long-term survival of the patients.

Machine learning radiomics can predict early liver recurrence after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Most patients recur after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC). We studied whether machine-learning incorporating radiomics and tumor size could predict intrahepatic recurrence within 1-year.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of patients with IHC resected between 2000 and 2017 who had evaluable computed tomography imaging. Texture features (TFs) were extracted from the liver, tumor, and future liver remnant (FLR). Random forest classification using training (70.3%) and validation cohorts (29.7%) was used to design a predictive model.

RESULTS

138 patients were included for analysis. Patients with early recurrence had a larger tumor size (7.25 cm [IQR 5.2-8.9] vs. 5.3 cm [IQR 4.0-7.2], P = 0.011) and a higher rate of lymph node metastasis (28.6% vs. 11.6%, P = 0.041), but were not more likely to have multifocal disease (21.4% vs. 17.4%, P = 0.643). Three TFs from the tumor, FD1, FD30, and IH4 and one from the FLR, ACM15, were identified by feature selection. Incorporation of TFs and tumor size achieved the highest AUC of 0.84 (95% CI 0.73-0.95) in predicting recurrence in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that radiomics and machine-learning can reliably predict patients at risk for early intrahepatic recurrence with good discrimination accuracy.

Impact of cirrhosis on long-term survival outcomes of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The correlation between cirrhosis and the long-term oncological outcome in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is debatable, and this study aimed to explore the impact of cirrhosis on the long-term prognosis of patients with ICC.

METHODS

A total of 398 ICC patients were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2000 to 2018. The diagnosis of cirrhosis was based on the Ishak fibrosis score provided by the SEER database. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis were performed to minimize the potential confounders. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were observed, and the Cox regression model was used to select potential factors that affect the prognosis of the patients with ICC.

RESULTS

Of the included patients, there were 142 patients and 256 patients in the cirrhotic and noncirrhotic groups, respectively. Additionally, 299 of 398 patients (75.1%) died following a median follow-up of 19 months (interquartile range [IQR], 7, 43). The OS and CSS indicated advantage trend in the noncirrhotic group than the cirrhotic group in either the original cohort (OS: 17 vs 12 months, p = 0.023; CSS: 26 vs 15 months, p = 0.004) or the PSM (OS: 17 vs 12 months, p = 0.52; CSS: 22 vs 14 months, p = 0.15) or IPTW (OS: 20 vs 13 months, p = 0.163; CSS: 22 vs 15 months, p = 0.059) cohorts. Subgroup analyses displayed that the prognosis of patients who experienced surgery for ICC in the noncirrhotic group was better than that of the cirrhotic group with regard to OS and CSS.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, it seems that the noncirrhotic patients have similar relative OS but better CSS compared with that of the cirrhotic patients.

Aggressive local treatment for recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma—Stereotactic radiofrequency ablation as a valuable addition to hepatic resection

Background

To evaluate the efficacy, safety and overall clinical outcome of local treatment for recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma after hepatic resection.

Methods

Between 2007 and 2019 72 consecutive patients underwent hepatic resection for primary intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma. If amenable, recurrent tumors were aggressively treated by HR or stereotactic radiofrequency ablation with local curative intent. Endpoints consisted of morbidity and mortality, locoregional and de novo recurrence, disease free survival, and overall survival.

Results

After a median follow-up of 28 months, recurrence of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma was observed in 43 of 72 patients undergoing hepatic resection (60.3%). 16 patients were subsequently treated by hepatic resection (n = 5) and stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (n = 11) with local curative intention. The remaining 27 patients underwent palliative treatment for first recurrence. Overall survival of patients who underwent repeated aggressive liver-directed therapy was comparable to patients without recurrence (p = 0.938) and was better as compared to patients receiving palliative treatment (p = 0.018). The 5-year overall survival rates for patients without recurrence, the repeated liver-directed treatment group and the palliative treatment group were 54.3%, 47.7% and 12.3%, respectively. By adding stereotactic radiofrequency ablation as an alternative treatment option, the rate of curative re-treatment increased from 11.9% to 37.2%.

Conclusion

Repeated hepatic resection is often precluded due to patient morbidity or anatomical and functional limitations. Due to the application of stereotactic radiofrequency ablation in case of recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma, the number of patients treated with curative intent can be increased. This leads to favorable clinical outcome as compared to palliative treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma recurrence.

Radiomics Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced CT for the Preoperative Prediction of Microvascular Invasion in Mass-Forming Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Background

Microvascular invasion (MVI) has been shown to be closely associated with postoperative recurrence and metastasis in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). We aimed to develop a radiomics prediction model based on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) to distinguish MVI in patients with mass-forming ICC.

Methods

157 patients were included and randomly divided into training (n=110) and test (n=47) datasets. Radiomic signatures were built based on the recursive feature elimination support vector machine (Rfe-SVM) algorithm. Significant clinical-radiologic factors were screened, and a clinical model was built by multivariate logistic regression. A nomogram was developed by integrating radiomics signature and the significant clinical risk factors.

Results

The portal phase image radiomics signature with 6 features was constructed and provided an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.804 in the training and 0.769 in the test datasets. Three significant predictors, including satellite nodules (odds ratio [OR]=13.73), arterial hypo-enhancement (OR=4.31), and tumor contour (OR=4.99), were identified by multivariate analysis. The clinical model using these predictors exhibited an AUC of 0.822 in the training and 0.756 in the test datasets. The nomogram combining significant clinical factors and radiomics signature achieved satisfactory prediction efficacy, showing an AUC of 0.886 in the training and 0.80 in the test datasets.

Conclusions

Both CECT radiomics analysis and radiologic factors have the potential for MVI prediction in mass-forming ICC patients. The nomogram can further improve the prediction efficacy.

Reappraisal of the T Category for Solitary Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma by Tumor Size in 611 Early-Stage (T1-2N0M0) Patients After Hepatectomy: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Analysis

BACKGROUND

The association between tumor size and survival in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) after hepatectomy is controversial, and the T category in the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage for ICC is a topic of debate.

METHODS

Data from 611 T1-2N0M0 ICC patients classified by the AJCC 8th edition who underwent hepatectomy were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database during 1988-2015. Cancer-specific survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The optimal cutoff value of solitary tumor size was used an adjusted p value approach to discriminating patient survival.

RESULTS

In the AJCC 8th staging system, using a 5-cm cut-off value of tumor size for solitary ICC without vascular invasion (S/VI-) was not associated with survival in T1 category (p = 0.201), and multifocal ICC with vascular invasion had a worse survival than solitary ICC with vascular invasion (S/VI+) in T2 category (p = 0.014). Tumor size was a prognostic factor for both S/VI- and S/VI+, the optimal cutoff value of tumor size was obtained 8 cm for S/VI- and 3 cm for S/VI+. S/VI- ≤ 8 cm had a similar survival to S/VI+ ≤ 3 cm (p = 0.126), S/VI- > 8 cm had a similar survival to S/VI+ > 3 cm (p = 0.655), and multifocal ICC had a similar survival with S/VI- > 8 cm (p = 0.159) and S/VI+ > 3 cm (p = 0.196). When the cohort was divided into two groups-new T1 (S/VI- ≤ 8 cm and S/VI+ ≤ 3 cm) and new T2 (S/VI- > 8 cm, S/VI+ > 3 cm and multifocal ICC)-significant survival difference was observed (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The discriminatory power of the AJCC 8th edition for solitary ICC could be further enhanced by subdividing tumors according to size and vascular invasion (8 cm for S/VI- and 3 cm for S/VI+).

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic factors for recurrence and survival in a series of 67 patients treated surgically at a single center

INTRODUCTION

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a primary liver neoplasm whose only curative treatment is surgery. The objective of this study was to determine the prognostic factors for survival of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated surgically with curative intent.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients who had been treated surgically for this neoplasm were collected at Bellvitge University Hospital between 1996 and 2017. Epidemiological, clinical, surgical, anatomopathological, morbidity, mortality and survival data have been analysed.

RESULTS

Postoperative study reflects our centre's experience in the surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma over a period of 21 years. Lymphadenectomy was associated with increased morbidity, and vascular invasion in the pathological study was the most important risk factor in the survival analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reflects our centre's experience in the surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma over a period of 21 years. Lymphadenectomy was associated with increased morbidity, and vascular invasion in the pathological study was the most important risk factor in the survival analysis.

Atorvastatin Augments Gemcitabine-Mediated Anti-Cancer Effects by Inhibiting Yes-Associated Protein in Human Cholangiocarcinoma Cells

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is associated with high mortality rates because of its resistance to conventional gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Hydroxy-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) reportedly exert anti-cancer effects in CCA and lower the risk of CCA; however, the underlying mechanism of these effects remains unclear. The proliferative and oncogenic activities of the transcriptional co-activator Yes-associated protein (YAP) are driven by its association with the TEA domain (TEAD) of transcription factors; thereby, upregulating genes that promote cell growth, inhibit apoptosis, and confer chemoresistance. This study investigated the effects of atorvastatin in combination with gemcitabine on the progression of human CCA associated with YAP oncogenic regulation. Both atorvastatin and gemcitabine concentration-dependently suppressed the proliferation of HuCCT-1 and KKU-M213 human CCA cells. Moreover, both agents induced cellular apoptosis by upregulating the pro-apoptotic marker BAX and downregulating the anti-apoptotic markers MCL1 and BCL2. Atorvastatin also significantly decreased the mRNA expression of the TEAD target genes CTGF, CYR61, ANKRD1, and MFAP5 in both CCA cell lines. A xenograft tumor growth assay indicated that atorvastatin and gemcitabine potently repressed human CCA cell-derived subcutaneous tumor growth by inhibiting YAP nuclear translocation and TEAD transcriptional activation. Notably, the anti-cancer effects of the individual agents were significantly enhanced in combination. These results indicate that gemcitabine plus atorvastatin could serve as a potential novel treatment option for CCA.

Developing a Selection-aided Model to Screen Cirrhotic Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma for Hepatectomy

Background: This study aimed to establish a model predicting the prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients with cirrhosis before liver resection (LR). Methods: An Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital (EHBH) model using the preoperative factors was established in a training cohort (305 patients from 2006 to 2011) and validated in an internal validation cohort (113 patients from 2012 to 2014). Predictive performance and discrimination were evaluated and compared with other staging systems. Results: The EHBH model containing preoperative factors of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), radiological tumor diameter, tumor number, and satellite nodules outperformed other staging systems in predicting the prognosis of ICC. A contour plot of 3-year survival probability and a nomogram to form two differentiated groups of patients (high-risk group and low-risk group) were constructed based on the EHBH model to help surgeons predicting the overall survival (OS) before LR. Patients from the high-risk group (>86.56 points) in the training cohort had worse OS rates compared with those from the low-risk group (≤86.56 points). The one-, three-, and five-year OS rates were 50.4%, 29.0%, and 21.0% for the high-risk group and 68.2%, 45.5%, and 39.7% for the low-risk group, respectively (P<0.001). The same results were obtained in the internal validation patients. Conclusion: The contour plot is an easy-to-use tool to individually show the 3-year prognosis of ICC patients with different preoperative CA19-9 values and radiological characteristics before surgery. The EHBH model was suitable for selecting cirrhotic patients for LR to acquire a better survival.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic factors for recurrence and survival in a series of 67 patients treated surgically at a single center

INTRODUCTION

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a primary liver neoplasm whose only curative treatment is surgery. The objective of this study was to determine the prognostic factors for survival of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated surgically with curative intent.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients who had been treated surgically for this neoplasm were collected at Bellvitge University Hospital between 1996 and 2017. Epidemiological, clinical, surgical, anatomopathological, morbidity, mortality and survival data have been analysed.

RESULTS

Postoperative morbidity was 47.76%, and postoperative mortality was 1.5%. Lymphadenectomy was associated with increased morbidity. Overall survival was 91%, 49.2% and 39.8% after 12, 36 and 60 months, respectively, and disease-free survival was 67.2%, 32.8% and 22.4%. Postoperative morbidity (reoperation, vascular invasion, adjuvant chemotherapy) were shown to be factors for a poor prognosis. Vascular invasion in the pathological study was the most important risk factor in the survival analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reflects our centre's experience in the surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma over a period of 21 years. Lymphadenectomy was associated with increased morbidity, and vascular invasion in the pathological study was the most important risk factor in the survival analysis.

Efficacy of surgical management for recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A multi-institutional study by the Okayama Study Group of HBP surgery

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has been poor, because of the high recurrence rate even after curative surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of surgical resection of recurrent ICC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 345 cases of ICC who underwent hepatectomy with curative intent in 17 institutions were retrospectively analyzed, focusing on recurrence patterns and treatment modalities for recurrent ICC.

RESULTS

Median survival time and overall 5-year recurrence-free survival rate were 17.8 months and 28.5%, respectively. Recurrences (n = 223) were classified as early (recurrence at ≤1 year, n = 131) or late (recurrence at >1 year, n = 92). Median survival time was poorer for early recurrence (16.3 months) than for late recurrence (47.7 months, p<0.0001). Treatment modalities for recurrence comprised surgical resection (n = 28), non-surgical treatment (n = 134), and best supportive care (BSC) (n = 61). Median and overall 1-/5-year survival rates after recurrence were 39.5 months and 84.6%/36.3% for surgical resection, 14.3 months and 62.5%/2.9% for non-surgical treatment, and 3 months and 4.8%/0% for BSC, respectively (p<0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified early recurrence, simultaneous intra- and extrahepatic recurrence, and surgical resection of recurrence as significant prognostic factors. In subgroup analyses, surgical resection may have positive prognostic impacts on intra- and extrahepatic recurrences, and even on early recurrence. However, simultaneous intra- and extrahepatic recurrence may not see any survival benefit from surgical management.

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection of recurrent ICC could improve survival after recurrence, especially for patients with intra- or extrahepatic recurrence as resectable oligo-metastases.

Intention-to-treat curative liver resection in patients with "very early" intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a rare type of liver cancer. "Very early" ICC, defined as a solitary lesion of ≤ 2 cm in diameter, appears to have a favorable outcome.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the outcome of patients with "very early" ICC treated with curative surgical resection in an intention-to-treat analysis.

METHODS

All patients with ICC undergoing surgical resection at the Hospital Clínic of Barcelona (Spain) between April 2000 and December 2018 were reviewed, and those with evident "very early" ICC in preoperative imaging studies were selected. Results of histopathologic examination of the surgical specimen, postoperative complications, recurrence, and survival were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 89 patients operated for ICC during the study period, 7 (7.9%) met the "very early" criteria at preoperative imaging. Two (TNM 7th) and four (TNM 8th) patients were classified as stage I, following histological examination of their resected specimens. One patient presented with postoperative morbidity (grade II Clavien-Dindo). The median (IQR) hospital stay was 5 days (3-7). After a median follow-up of 23 months (IQR 11.9-80.6), recurrence was diagnosed in one case at 8.3 months after surgery. The overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 85.7%, 68.6%, and 68.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Intention-to-treat curative surgery in "very early" ICC is associated with good results in terms of survival and recurrence. However, most patients presented more advanced stages in the definitive pathological analysis, associated with a lower survival. Future prospective multicenter studies are required to validate these encouraging data.

Resection of Mixed Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Mixed hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (HCC-CC) is a biphenotypic liver cancer thought to have unfavorable tumor biology and a poor prognosis. Surgical outcomes of HCC-CC remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of HCC-CC. We analyzed a series of patients undergoing resection for HCC-CC (n = 47), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; n = 468), and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC; n = 108) at a single Western center between 2001 and 2015. Patients with HCC-CC were matched to patients with HCC and ICC on important clinical factors including tumor characteristics (size, vascular invasion, and differentiation) and underlying cirrhosis. Patients with HCC-CC had rates of viral hepatitis comparable to patients with HCC (78.7% versus 80.0%), and 42.5% had underlying cirrhosis. When matched on tumor size, HCC-CC was more poorly differentiated than HCC (68.3% versus 27.3%; P < 0.001) and ICC (68.3% versus 34.8%; P = 0.01) but had similar postresection survival (5-year survival: HCC-CC 49.7%, HCC 54.8%, ICC 68.7%; P = 0.61) and recurrence (3-year recurrence: HCC-CC 57.9%, HCC 61.5%, and ICC 56%; P = 0.58). Outcomes were similar between HCC-CC and HCC when matched on underlying cirrhosis and tumor size. Cancer type was not predictive of survival or tumor recurrence. Survival after resection of HCC-CC is similar to HCC when matched for tumor size, despite HCC-CC tumors being more poorly differentiated. Exclusion of HCC-CC from management strategies recommended for HCC, including consideration for liver transplantation, may not be warranted.

Long-term outcome and prognostic factors of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma involving the hepatic hilus versus hilar cholangiocarcinoma after curative-intent resection: Should they be recognized as perihilar cholangiocarcinoma or differentiated?

BACKGROUND

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is defined as tumors arising predominantly at or near the biliary confluence, potentially consisting of two types: hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma involving the hepatic hilum (hICC). However, whether hICC and HC should be strictly distinguished or combined remains highly controversial. We aimed to compare the clinicopathological characteristics, prognostic factors and long-term outcome of hICC versus HC after curative-intent resection.

METHODS

Between January 1998 and June 2015, a total of 325 patients with hICC (n = 146) and HC (n = 179) who underwent curative-intent resection were enrolled. The medical records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Portal vein invasion, larger tumors, and later T stage were significantly more common in hICC group. A total of 110 (75.3%) hICC patients and 119 (66.5%) HC patients experienced tumor recurrences, respectively. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of hICC patients were significantly worse than those of HC patients (median RFS, 14.3 versus 22.7 months, P = 0.014; median OS, 21.7 versus 30.6 months, P = 0.032). Multivariate analysis revealed tumor size, satellite nodules, surgical margin, and histological grade as independent factors for OS in hICC patients. On the other hand, the presence of liver parenchyma invasion, portal invasion, lymphovascular invasion, later N stage, and positive surgical margin were associated with shorter OS in HC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

hICC showed distinct clinicopathological features, more aggressive biological behaviors, different prognostic factors, and worse prognosis in comparison with HC. Therefore, making a strict distinction between hICC and HC is necessary.

Recurrence Patterns and Timing Courses Following Curative-Intent Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Recurrence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) after curative resection is common.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the patterns, timing and risk factors of disease recurrence after curative-intent resection for ICC.

METHODS

Patients undergoing curative resection for ICC were identified from a multi-institutional database. Data on clinicopathological and initial operation information, timing and first sites of recurrence, recurrence management, and long-term outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 920 patients were included. With a median follow-up of 38 months, 607 patients (66.0%) experienced ICC recurrence. In the cohort, 145 patients (23.9%) recurred at the surgical margin, 178 (29.3%) recurred within the liver away from the surgical margin, 90 (14.8%) recurred at extraheptatic sites, and 194 (32.0%) developed both intrahepatic and extrahepatic recurrence. Intrahepatic margin recurrence (median 6.0 m) and extrahepatic-only recurrence (median 8.0 m) tended to occur early, while intrahepatic recurrence at non-margin sites occurred later (median 14.0 m; p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, surgical margin < 10 mm was associated with increased margin recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-2.60; p = 0.014), whereas female sex (HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.40-3.22; p < 0.001) and liver cirrhosis (HR 2.36, 95% CI 1.31-4.25; p = 0.004) were both associated with an increased risk of intrahepatic recurrence at other sites. Median survival after recurrence was better among patients who underwent repeat curative-intent surgery (48.7 months) versus other treatments (9.7 months) [p < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

Different recurrence patterns and timing of recurrence suggest biological heterogeneity of ICC tumor recurrence. Understanding timing and risk factors associated with different types of recurrence can hopefully inform discussions around adjuvant therapy, surveillance, and treatment of recurrent disease.

Resection for intrahepatic cholangiocellular cancer: new advances

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most prevalent primary liver neoplasm after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), corresponding to 10% to 15% of cases. Pathologies that cause chronic biliary inflammation and bile stasis are known predisposing factors for development of ICC. The incidence and cancer-related mortality of ICC is increasing worldwide. Most patients remain asymptomatic until advance stage, commonly presenting with a liver mass incidentally diagnosed. The only potentially curative treatment available for ICC is surgical resection. The prognosis is dismal for unresectable cases. The principle of the surgical approach is a margin negative hepatic resection with preservation of adequate liver remnant. Regional lymphadenectomy is recommended at time of hepatectomy due to the massive impact on outcomes caused by lymph node (LN) metastasis. Multicentric disease, tumor size, margin status and tumor differentiation are also important prognostic factors. Staging laparoscopy is warranted in high-risk patients to avoid unnecessary laparotomy. Exceedingly complex surgical procedures, such as major vascular, extrahepatic bile ducts and visceral resections, ex vivo hepatectomy and autotransplantation, should be implemented in properly selected patients to achieve negative margins. Neoadjuvant therapy may be used in initially unresectable lesions in order to downstage and allow resection. Despite optimal surgical management, recurrence is frustratingly high. Adjuvant chemotherapy with radiation associated with locoregional treatments should be considered in cases with unfavorable prognostic factors. Selected patients may undergo re-resection of tumor recurrence. Despite the historically poor outcomes of liver transplantation for ICC, highly selected patients with unresectable disease, especially those with adequate response to neoadjuvant therapy, may be offered transplant. In this article, we reviewed the current literature in order to highlight the most recent advances and recommendations for the surgical treatment of this aggressive malignancy.

Challenges of surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a rare malignancy arising from biliary tract epithelium within bile ducts proximal to the secondary biliary radicles. The majority of patients are diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic disease at presentation. Surgical resection remains the only potentially curative option, but poses unique challenges due to the large size and aggressive behavior of these tumors. Areas covered: The goal of surgical management of iCCA is margin negative (R0) hepatic resection with preservation of adequate size liver remnant and function. Data regarding role of staging laparoscopy, margin status, portal lymphadenectomy, and vascular resection for iCCA are reviewed. Perioperative systemic therapy may have value, although prospective data have been lacking. Recurrence rates remain high even after R0 resection; among patients with recurrent disease limited to the liver, re-resection or locoregional therapies may play a role. Liver transplantation may be an option for select patients with very early-stage iCCA, although this should be done on a protocol-only basis. Expert commentary: Appropriate preoperative patient selection and surgical technique are paramount to ensure optimal oncologic outcomes for patients with resectable iCCA. Improving systemic and locoregional therapy options may help decrease recurrence rates and improve long-term survival for this aggressive malignancy.