1
|
Khosla D, Misra S, Chu PL, Guan P, Nada R, Gupta R, Kaewnarin K, Ko TK, Heng HL, Srinivasalu VK, Kapoor R, Singh D, Klanrit P, Sampattavanich S, Tan J, Kongpetch S, Jusakul A, Teh BT, Chan JY, Hong JH. Cholangiocarcinoma: Recent Advances in Molecular Pathobiology and Therapeutic Approaches. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:801. [PMID: 38398194 PMCID: PMC10887007 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinomas (CCA) pose a complex challenge in oncology due to diverse etiologies, necessitating tailored therapeutic approaches. This review discusses the risk factors, molecular pathology, and current therapeutic options for CCA and explores the emerging strategies encompassing targeted therapies, immunotherapy, novel compounds from natural sources, and modulation of gut microbiota. CCA are driven by an intricate landscape of genetic mutations, epigenetic dysregulation, and post-transcriptional modification, which differs based on geography (e.g., for liver fluke versus non-liver fluke-driven CCA) and exposure to environmental carcinogens (e.g., exposure to aristolochic acid). Liquid biopsy, including circulating cell-free DNA, is a potential diagnostic tool for CCA, which warrants further investigations. Currently, surgical resection is the primary curative treatment for CCA despite the technical challenges. Adjuvant chemotherapy, including cisplatin and gemcitabine, is standard for advanced, unresectable, or recurrent CCA. Second-line therapy options, such as FOLFOX (oxaliplatin and 5-FU), and the significance of radiation therapy in adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and palliative settings are also discussed. This review underscores the need for personalized therapies and demonstrates the shift towards precision medicine in CCA treatment. The development of targeted therapies, including FDA-approved drugs inhibiting FGFR2 gene fusions and IDH1 mutations, is of major research focus. Investigations into immune checkpoint inhibitors have also revealed potential clinical benefits, although improvements in survival remain elusive, especially across patient demographics. Novel compounds from natural sources exhibit anti-CCA activity, while microbiota dysbiosis emerges as a potential contributor to CCA progression, necessitating further exploration of their direct impact and mechanisms through in-depth research and clinical studies. In the future, extensive translational research efforts are imperative to bridge existing gaps and optimize therapeutic strategies to improve therapeutic outcomes for this complex malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Divya Khosla
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India
| | - Shagun Misra
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India
| | - Pek Lim Chu
- Cancer and Stem Cell Biology Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore
| | - Peiyong Guan
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore 138672, Singapore
| | - Ritambhra Nada
- Department of Histopathology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India
| | - Rajesh Gupta
- Department of GI Surgery, HPB, and Liver Transplantation, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India
| | - Khwanta Kaewnarin
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Biodiversity Medicine, Singapore 168583, Singapore
| | - Tun Kiat Ko
- Cancer Discovery Hub, National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore 168583, Singapore
| | - Hong Lee Heng
- Laboratory of Cancer Epigenome, Division of Medical Science, National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore 168583, Singapore
| | - Vijay Kumar Srinivasalu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Center, NH Health City Campus, Bommasandra, Bangalore 560099, India
| | - Rakesh Kapoor
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India
| | - Deepika Singh
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Biodiversity Medicine, Singapore 168583, Singapore
| | - Poramate Klanrit
- Cholangiocarcinoma Screening and Care Program (CASCAP), Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
| | - Somponnat Sampattavanich
- Siriraj Center of Research Excellence for Systems Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 73170, Thailand
| | - Jing Tan
- Laboratory of Cancer Epigenome, Division of Medical Science, National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore 168583, Singapore
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Sarinya Kongpetch
- Cholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
| | - Apinya Jusakul
- Cholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
- Centre for Research and Development of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
| | - Bin Tean Teh
- Cancer and Stem Cell Biology Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore 138672, Singapore
- Laboratory of Cancer Epigenome, Division of Medical Science, National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore 168583, Singapore
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore 138673, Singapore
| | - Jason Yongsheng Chan
- Cancer Discovery Hub, National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore 168583, Singapore
- Oncology Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center, Singapore 168583, Singapore
| | - Jing Han Hong
- Cancer and Stem Cell Biology Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nooijen LE, van der Snee L, Ten Haaft B, Kazemier G, Klümpen HJ, Bridgewater J, Primrose J, Erdmann J. A critical appraisal of the potential benefit of post-operative structured follow-up after resection for biliary tract cancer. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:179-187. [PMID: 37891150 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is currently no evidence to support structured use of imaging or biomarkers during follow-up of patients after curative resection of biliary tract cancer (BTC). Besides, the influence of early detection of recurrence and subsequent start of palliative chemotherapy on overall survival remains unknown. The aim of this study is to describe and compare the results of two follow-up strategies. METHODS This retrospective multicenter cohort study compared patients from the Amsterdam UMC undergoing pragmatic clinical follow-up, to patients from the observational cohort of the BILCAP study undergoing structured follow-up. Primary outcome was overall survival. RESULTS A total of 315 patients were included n=91 pragmatic, n=224 structured follow-up). At median follow-up of 56.9 months, 189 (60%) patients were diagnosed with recurrence. After recurrence, more patients received palliative (chemo) therapy in the structured group (43% vs 75%, P<0.001). Median overall survival was lower in the pragmatic group (27.7 vs 39.1 months, P=0.003). Median overall survival of patients who actually received chemotherapy was comparable (27.2 vs 27.7 months, P=0.574). CONCLUSION This study describes the results of two follow-up strategies. Although these groups are biased, it is noted that after pragmatic follow-up fewer patients received palliative chemotherapy but that those who actually received chemotherapy had similar overall survival compared to patients undergoing structured follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn E Nooijen
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lizzel van der Snee
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Britte Ten Haaft
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Heinz-Josef Klümpen
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - John Bridgewater
- UCL Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, London, United Kingdom
| | - John Primrose
- University of Southampton, Department of Surgery, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Joris Erdmann
- Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Panettieri E, Vega EA, Salirrosas O, Harandi H, Kozyreva O, Mellado S, Conrad C. Does adjuvant treatment improve survival in R1 resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma? The risk of overtreatment. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:S1091-255X(24)00019-2. [PMID: 38577811 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is associated with positive margins in up to half of the patients. It remains unclear whether adjuvant therapies contribute to improved survival in patients undergoing R1 resection for pCCA. METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed with pCCA between 2004 and 2016. Patients with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis were excluded. RESULTS A total of 1756 patients were included (286 surgical patients and 1470 nonsurgical patients). Patients who underwent R0 resection showed a significantly better median overall survival (OS) than that of patients who underwent R1 resection (41.7 vs 21.4 months, respectively; P = .003). Nevertheless, OS was better in patients who underwent R1 resection than in nonsurgical patients (21.4 vs 6.3 months, respectively; P < .001). Patients undergoing chemoradiation after R1 resection had similar OS to that of those receiving any other adjuvant therapy (21.4 vs 19.4 months, respectively; P = .789) or no adjuvant treatment (21.4 vs 19.8 months, respectively; P = .925). After uni- and multivariable analyses, T stage ≥3 and R1 margins were independently associated with worse survival after surgery. CONCLUSION As currently neither radiation, chemoradiation, nor chemotherapy seem to significantly improve survival in patients who underwent R1 resection for pCCA, high-quality surgical resection remains critically important. Moreover, the concern of overtreatment of patients who underwent R1 resection with current adjuvant therapeutic regimes exists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Panettieri
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli", Scientific Institute for Research, Hospitalization and Healthcare, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Oscar Salirrosas
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Hamed Harandi
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Olga Kozyreva
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute at St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Sebastian Mellado
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ioka T, Shindo Y, Ueno M, Nagano H. Current progress in perioperative chemotherapy for biliary tract cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2023; 7:565-571. [PMID: 37416744 PMCID: PMC10319609 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Biliary tract cancer (BTCs) is a heterogeneous malignancy divided into cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, and ampullary cancer. Due to little or no symptoms, most patients with BTCs are diagnosed with unresectable or metastatic disease. Only 20%-30% of all BTCs are suitable for potentially resectable diseases. Although radical resection with a negative surgical margin is the only potentially curative method for BTCs, most patients develop postoperative recurrence, which is associated with poor prognosis. Therefore, perioperative treatment is necessary to improve survival. There are very few randomized phase III clinical trials of perioperative chemotherapy due to the relative rarity of BTCs. Adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 for patients with resected BTC significantly increased overall survival compared with upfront surgery in a recent ASCOT trial. In East Asia, S-1 is currently considered the standard adjuvant chemotherapy, while capecitabine may still be used in other areas. Since then, our phase III trial (KHBO1401), gemcitabine and cisplatin plus S-1 (GCS) has become the standard chemotherapy for advanced BTCs. GCS not only improved overall survival but demonstrated a high response rate. The efficacy of GCS as a preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable BTCs has been investigated in a randomized phase III trial (JCOG1920) in Japan. In this review, we summarize the current and ongoing clinical trials focusing on adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for BTCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuya Ioka
- Department of Oncology CenterYamaguchi University HospitalUbeJapan
| | - Yoshitaro Shindo
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast, and Endocrine SurgeryYamaguchi University Graduate School of MedicineUbeJapan
| | - Makoto Ueno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology DivisionKanagawa Cancer CenterYokohamaJapan
| | - Hiroaki Nagano
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast, and Endocrine SurgeryYamaguchi University Graduate School of MedicineUbeJapan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liu QQ, Shi XD, Ye YF, Tang QB, Lin HM, Yu XH, Zhang R, Liu C. Real-world experience of postoperative adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma at high risk of recurrence. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2023; 72:1753-1761. [PMID: 36648557 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-022-03362-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to assess whether postoperative adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy could lead to better clinical outcomes for high-risk patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). METHODS In the cohort study, we retrospectively reviewed patients who received surgical resection for pCCA with curative intent from January 2018 to December 2021 at the Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital. The patients at high risk for relapse were further analyzed. Among them, 20 patients received adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, 28 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, and 33 patients received surgery alone. The oncological outcomes and drug-associated adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS The 2-year overall survival (OS) rates in patients treated with adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and surgery alone were 80.0%, 49.4% and 22.6%, respectively. Univariable and multivariable Cox analyses showed that the treatment regimen and TNM stage were associated with adverse OS. Adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy led to an increase in OS compared with adjuvant chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.253; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.072-9.870; P = 0.037] or surgery alone (HR = 7.560; 95% CI 2.508-22.785; P < 0.001). The median recurrence-free survival was 22.0 months for the adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy group, 17.0 months for the adjuvant chemotherapy group, and 13.2 months for the surgery alone group (P = 0.177); these differences were not significant. The chemoimmunotherapy group was associated with more frequent hematological side effects than the chemotherapy group, but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION Postoperative adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for resected pCCA patients showed improved OS compared with adjuvant chemotherapy or surgery alone, and further prospectively randomized controlled trials are necessary to validate these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qin-Qin Liu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation and Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - Xiang-de Shi
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation and Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - Yan-Fang Ye
- Clinical Research Design Division, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Qi-Bin Tang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation and Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - Hao-Ming Lin
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation and Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - Xian-Huan Yu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation and Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - Rui Zhang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation and Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
| | - Chao Liu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation and Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schmelzle M, Benzing C, Fischer L, Herden U, Sterneck M, Settmacher U, Bauschke A, Neumann U, Pelzer U, Müller T, Strassburg C, Lang H, Becker T, Königsrainer A, Nadalin S, Quante M, Paul A, Friess H, Klempnauer J, Richter N, Vondran F, Pascher A, Rösch T, Schöning W, Krenzien F, Öllinger R, Seehofer D, Neuhaus P, Pratschke J. Feasibility and Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Gemcitabine After Liver Transplantation for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma - A Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled Trial (pro-duct001). Front Oncol 2022; 12:910871. [PMID: 36330499 PMCID: PMC9624225 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.910871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Liver transplantation (LT) is considered a therapeutic option for unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) within defined criteria. It remains uncertain whether patients can safely receive adjuvant chemotherapy after LT. Methods We performed a prospective, multi-center, randomized, non-blinded two-arm trial (pro-duct001). Patients after LT for unresectable PHC within defined criteria were randomized to adjuvant gemcitabine (LT-Gem group) and LT alone (LT alone group). The primary objective was to investigate if adjuvant chemotherapy is feasible in ≥ 85% of patients after LT. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients completing the 24 weeks course of adjuvant chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and disease-free (DFS), and complication rates. Results Twelve patients underwent LT for PHC, of which six (50%) were eligible for randomization (LT-Gem: three patients, LT alone: three patients). Two out of three patients discontinued adjuvant chemotherapy after LT due to intolerance. The study was prematurely terminated due to slow enrollment. One patient with PHC had underlying primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Tumor-free margins could be achieved in all patients. In both the LT-Gem and the LT alone group, the cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and DFS rates were 100%, 100%, 67%, and 100%, 67% and 67%, respectively. Conclusions This prospective, multi-center study was prematurely terminated due to slow enrollment and a statement on the defined endpoints cannot be made. Nevertheless, long-term survival data are consistent with available retrospective data and confirm defined criteria for LT. Since more evidence of LT per se in unresectable PHC is urgently needed, a prospective, non-randomized follow-up study (pro-duct002) has since been launched.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz Schmelzle
- Department of Surgery, Charité – Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christian Benzing
- Department of Surgery, Charité – Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lutz Fischer
- Department of Visceral Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Uta Herden
- Department of Visceral Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martina Sterneck
- Department of Medicine I, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Utz Settmacher
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Astrid Bauschke
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Ulf Neumann
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Uwe Pelzer
- Department of Medicine - Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tobias Müller
- Department of Medicine - Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Hauke Lang
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Becker
- Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplant and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Alfred Königsrainer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Markus Quante
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Paul
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Helmut Friess
- Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Transplant, University Hospital rechts der Isar, München, Germany
| | - Jürgen Klempnauer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Nicolas Richter
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Florian Vondran
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Pascher
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Thomas Rösch
- University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Klinik und Poliklinik für Interdisziplinäre Endoskopie, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Wenzel Schöning
- Department of Surgery, Charité – Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Krenzien
- Department of Surgery, Charité – Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert Öllinger
- Department of Surgery, Charité – Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Seehofer
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Peter Neuhaus
- Department of Surgery, Charité – Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Charité – Universitätsmedizin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- *Correspondence: Johann Pratschke,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aquina CT, Eskander MF, Pawlik TM. Liver-Directed Treatment Options Following Liver Tumor Recurrence: A Review of the Literature. Front Oncol 2022; 12:832405. [PMID: 35174097 PMCID: PMC8841620 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.832405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Recurrence following curative-intent hepatectomy for colorectal cancer liver metastasis, hepatocellular carcinoma, or cholangiocarcinoma is unfortunately common with a reported incidence as high as 75%. Various treatment modalities can improve survival following disease recurrence. A review of the literature was performed using PubMed. In addition to systemic therapy, liver-directed treatment options for recurrent liver disease include repeat hepatectomy, salvage liver transplantation, radiofrequency or microwave ablation, intra-arterial therapy, and stereotactic body radiation therapy. Repeat resection can be consider for patients with limited recurrent disease that meets resection criteria, as this therapeutic approach can provide a survival benefit and is potentially curative in a subset of patients. Salvage liver transplantation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma is another option, which has been associated with a 5-year survival of 50%. Salvage transplantation may be an option in particular for patients who are not candidates for resection due to underlying liver dysfunction but meet criteria for transplantation. Ablation is another modality to treat patients who recur with smaller tumors and are not surgical candidates due to comorbidity, liver dysfunction, or tumor location. For patients with inoperable disease, transarterial chemoembolization, or radioembolization with Yttrium-90 are liver-directed intra-arterial therapy modalities with relatively low risks that can be utilized. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is another palliative treatment option that can provide a response and local tumor control for smaller tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher T. Aquina
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
- Digestive Health and Surgery Institute, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, FL, United States
| | - Mariam F. Eskander
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School and Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Timothy M. Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
- *Correspondence: Timothy M. Pawlik,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hu C, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Li T, Zheng X, Guo Q, Zhang X. Exosomal Cripto-1 Serves as a Potential Biomarker for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma. Front Oncol 2021; 11:730615. [PMID: 34434900 PMCID: PMC8380828 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.730615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCCA) has a poor prognosis, mainly due to diagnosis at an advanced stage. Cripto-1 functions as an oncogene and is highly expressed in several human cancers, however, its clinical application in PHCCA is poorly understood. Herein, we identified that Cripto-1 was released by PHCCA cells via exosomes in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, an ELISA method was developed to detect exosomal Cripto-1 in the serum of 115 PHCCA patients, 47 cholangitis patients and 65 healthy controls, and it was found that exosomal Cripto-1 was increased in PHCCA patients and associated with metastasis. Compared with traditional serum tumor markers, CA19-9 and CEA, exosomal Cripto-1 demonstrated a larger area under ROC curve for PHCCA diagnosis. The cutoff value of exosomal Cripto-1 was 0.82, achieving a sensitivity of 79.1% and a specificity of 87.5%. As expected, exosomal Cripto-1 levels in immunohistochemically Cripto-1-high cases were significantly elevated compared to in Cripto-1-low cases. When measured 1-week postoperatively, Cripto-1 levels decreased on average from 1.25(0.96-3.26) to 0.85(0.62-1.82). Immunohistochemistry analysis showed Cripto-1 expression was negatively correlated with E-cadherin and was an independent prognostic biomarker for poor survival in PHCCA patients. In conclusion, exosomal Cripto-1 in sera can reflect its expression in the tissue of PHCAA patients and has the potential be a non-invasive biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis of PHCCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunxiao Hu
- Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Yanli Zhang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shandong Provincial Third Hospital, Jinan, China
| | - Mengjiao Zhang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Tingting Li
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xin Zheng
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shandong Provincial Third Hospital, Jinan, China
| | - Qining Guo
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xin Zhang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Soares KC, Jarnagin WR. The Landmark Series: Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:4158-4170. [PMID: 33829358 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09871-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) is a rare and highly aggressive biliary tract neoplasm. As such, the data driving the management of this disease generally are not based on prospective clinical trial data but rather consist of retrospective experiences and limited level 1 data. Surgical resection offers the best chance of a long-term survival, but local and distant recurrences are common. This report presents landmark articles that form the basis of preoperative, operative, and adjuvant strategies for HC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin C Soares
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. .,Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Oldhafer KJ, von Hahn T, Arvanitakis M, Nagino M, Torres OJM. Improving Outcomes in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma. Visc Med 2021; 37:48-51. [PMID: 33718483 DOI: 10.1159/000514020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Karl J Oldhafer
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany.,Semmelweis University of Medicine, Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas von Hahn
- Semmelweis University of Medicine, Asklepios Campus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Orlando J M Torres
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital Universitário - School of Medicine, Federal University of Maranhão, Maranhão, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|