Scoping review of traumatic hemothorax: Evidence and knowledge gaps, from diagnosis to chest tube removal

Can Concurrent Traumatic Hemopneumothorax be Safely Observed?

INTRODUCTION

The cooccurrence of a traumatic hemothorax (HTX) and pneumothorax (PTX) is extremely common (70%). Prior work shows the safety of observing small HTX (≤300 cubic centimeters) and PTX (≤35 mm) in isolation. Accordingly, we sought to assess the safety of observation of concurrent small hemopneumothorax(HPTX).

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective study from 2015 to 2021 at a level I trauma center. Patients with a computed tomography (CT) scan confirmed that HPTXwas included in the study. Exclusion criteria included tube thoracostomy (TT) prior to CT scan, TT placement for rib fixation, PTX>35 mm, HTX>300 cubic centimeters, and death within 72 h of admission. The study group was stratified into either initial observation or early TT, which is defined as TT placement immediately after initial CT scan. Primary outcome was observation failure.

RESULTS

A total of 353 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 261 (74%) were initially observed. The initial observation cohort had a lower pulmonary morbidity rate (9% versus 14%; P = 0.04) and a shorter hospital (7 versus 10 d, P < 0.001) and intensive care unit (2 versus 4 d, P = 0.01) length of stay (LOS) when compared to those with initial TT placement. Sixty-eight (26%) patients failed observation, with a worsening HTXon repeat imaging (45%) being the most common reason. Compared to those who received an early TT, those who failed observation had a similar pulmonary morbidity and need for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, TT duration, LOS, readmission, and mortality rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial observation of concurrent small traumatic HPTX had a lower pulmonary morbidity and LOS but was found to have a clinically significant failure rate. Patients who failed observation had similar outcomes to those who received an early TT.

Pleural Space Management in Thoracic Trauma

SUMMARY

Thoracic injuries are common, occurring in up to 60% of polytrauma patients and represent 25% of trauma deaths. Thoracic trauma frequently involves injury to the pleural space resulting in hemothorax and pneumothorax-effective management of the pleural space is essential. Reviewed in this article is management of the pleural space in chest wall trauma (including pneumothorax and hemothorax), and chest tube placement, indications for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, management, and complications.

Thoracic irrigation for traumatic hemothorax: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Traumatic hemothoraces (HTXs) are common, and tube thoracostomy (TT) insertion is generally the initial management. However, a retained HTX can develop into a fibrothorax or empyema requiring secondary intervention. We hypothesized that irrigation of the thoracic cavity at the time of TT may prevent retained HTX.

METHODS

Pubmed, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched from inception to May 2024. Studies with adult trauma patients with traumatic HTX who received a TT and had patients who underwent thoracic irrigation were included. The primary outcome was failure rate, defined as retained HTX requiring a second intervention. Cumulative analysis was performed with χ2 for dichotomous variables and unpaired t test for continuous variables. A fixed-effects model was applied for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Six studies were included in the analysis; two retrospective and four prospective observational studies. These studies included 1,319 patients (513 irrigated TT, 837 nonirrigated TT). The mean age of patients was 45 years, 81% were male, mean Injury Severity Score was 21, and 42% had penetrating trauma. Failure rate was significantly lower in the irrigation group on cumulative analysis (10.7% vs. 18.2%, p < 0.001) and meta-analysis (effect size, 0.704; 95% confidence interval, 0.218-1.190; I2 = 0.4; p < 0.001]. In addition, on meta-analysis, the irrigation group had a shorter TT duration and hospital and ICU length of stay (all p < 0.05). There were no differences in overall infectious complications, readmission, or mortality; however, all the models favored the irrigation group.

CONCLUSION

Patients who undergo simultaneous TT and thoracic irrigation have a lower rate of retained HTX and require fewer secondary interventions. Thoracic irrigation for traumatic HTX should be considered; however, randomized studies are needed prior to development of guidelines.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic Review/Meta-analysis; Level III.

Implementation of 300-mL Rule for Management of Traumatic Hemothorax

BACKGROUND

Traumatic hemothorax (HTX) is often managed with tube thoracostomy (TT); however, TT carries a high complication rate. In 2017, a guideline was implemented at our Level I trauma center to observe traumatic HTX 300 mL or less in patients who are hemodynamically stable. We hypothesized that this guideline would decrease TT placement without increasing observation failure rates.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a single-center retrospective review of all adult patients admitted with an HTX on CT before (2015 to 2016) and after (2018 to 2019) the guideline implementation. Exclusion criteria were TT placement before CT scan, absence of CT scan, death within 5 days of admission, and a concurrent pneumothorax more than 20 mm. HTX volume was calculated using CT scan images and Mergo's formula: V = d2 × L (where V is the volume, d is the depth, and L is the length). The primary outcome was observation failure, defined as the need for TT, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, thoracotomy after repeat imaging or worsening of symptoms, and pulmonary morbidity.

RESULTS

A total of 357 patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 210 were admitted after guideline implementation. No significant differences in baseline demographics, comorbidities, or injury characteristics across both cohorts were observed. The postimplementation cohort had a significant increase in observation rate (75% vs 59%) and a decrease in TT placement (42% vs 57%). The postimplementation group had a statistically significant shorter hospital (6 vs 8 days) and ICU (2 vs 3 days) length of stay. No significant differences in observation failure, pulmonary complications, 30-day readmission, or 30-day mortality were observed across both cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of the 300-mL guideline led to a decrease in TT placement without increasing observation failure or complication rates.

Small versus large-bore thoracostomy for traumatic hemothorax: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Traumatic hemothorax (HTX) is common, and while it is recommended to drain it with a tube thoracostomy, there is no consensus on the optimal catheter size. We performed a systematic review to test the hypothesis that small bore tube thoracostomy (SBTT) (≤14 F) is as effective as large-bore tube thoracostomy (LBTT) (≥20F) for the treatment of HTX.

METHODS

Pubmed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane review were searched from inception to November 2022 for randomized controlled trials or cohort studies that included adult trauma patients with HTX who received a tube thoracostomy. Data was extracted and Critical Appraisal Skills Program checklists were used for study appraisal. The primary outcome was failure rate, defined as incompletely drained or retained HTX requiring a second intervention. Cumulative analysis was performed with χ 2 test for dichotomous variables and an unpaired t-test for continuous variables. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model.

RESULTS

There were 2,008 articles screened, of which nine were included in the analysis. The studies included 1,847 patients (714 SBTT and 1,233 LBTT). The mean age of patients was 46 years, 75% were male, average ISS was 20, and 81% had blunt trauma. Failure rate was not significantly different between SBTT (17.8%) and LBTT (21.5%) ( p = 0.166). Additionally, there were no significant differences between SBTT vs. LBTT in mortality (2.9% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.062) or complication rate (12.3% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.941), however SBTT had significantly higher initial drainage volumes (753 vs. 398 mL, p < 0.001) and fewer tube days (4.3 vs. 6.2, p < 0.001). There are several limitations. Some studies did not report all the outcomes of interest, and many of the studies are subject to selection bias.

CONCLUSION

SBTT may be as effective as LBTT for the treatment of traumatic HTX.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis; Level IV.

Not So Vats: How Early Is Too Early in the Operative Management of Patients with Traumatic Hemothorax?

BACKGROUND

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is a practical resource in the management of traumatic hemothorax. However, it carries inherent risks and should be mobilized cost-effectively. In this study, we investigated the ideal VATS timing using cost analysis.

METHODS

617 cases of unilateral traumatic hemothorax from 2012 to 2022 were identified in our trauma database. We extracted encounter cost, length of stay (LOS), and operative cost information. Using Kruskal-Walli's test, we compared the cost and LOS for patients who underwent VATS or continued nonoperative management in the first 7 days of admission. Additionally, we computed the daily proportion of patients initially managed nonoperatively but ultimately underwent VATS. P-values <.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

The median encounter cost of cases managed operatively before hospital day 4 (HD4) was higher than those managed nonoperatively. This difference was $63k on HD2 (P-value .07) and was statistically significant for HD3 (difference of $65k, P-value .02). The median LOS with operational management on HD2 and 3 was 7 and 6 respectively vs median LOS of 2 and 3 with nonoperative management on those days (P-value <.001, .01 respectively). The proportion of patients who failed nonoperative management did not change from baseline until HD4 (23% (95% CI 19.7, 26.3) vs 33.9% (95% CI 28.3, 39.6), P-value <.001).

DISCUSSION

Early mobilization of VATS before hospital day 4 increases the overall hospital cost without offering any length of stay benefit. Continuing nonoperative management longer than 4 days is associated with a high failure rate and a costlier operation.

Surgical and procedural antibiotic prophylaxis in the surgical ICU: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee clinical consensus document

The use of prophylactic measures, including perioperative antibiotics, for the prevention of surgical site infections is a standard of care across surgical specialties. Unfortunately, the routine guidelines used for routine procedures do not always account for many of the factors encountered with urgent/emergent operations and critically ill or high-risk patients. This clinical consensus document created by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee is one of a three-part series and reviews surgical and procedural antibiotic prophylaxis in the surgical intensive care unit. The purpose of this clinical consensus document is to provide practical recommendations, based on expert opinion, to assist intensive care providers with decision-making for surgical prophylaxis. We specifically evaluate the current state of periprocedural antibiotic management of external ventricular drains, orthopedic operations (closed and open fractures, silver dressings, local, antimicrobial adjuncts, spine surgery, subfascial drains), abdominal operations (bowel injury and open abdomen), and bedside procedures (thoracostomy tube, gastrostomy tube, tracheostomy).

Management of Blunt Chest Trauma

Common mechanisms of blunt thoracic injury include motor vehicle collisions and falls. Chest wall injuries include rib fractures and sternal fractures; treatment involves supportive care, multimodal analgesia, and pulmonary toilet. Pneumothorax, hemothorax, and pulmonary contusions are also common and may be managed expectantly or with tube thoracostomy as indicated. Surgical treatment may be considered in select cases. Less common injury patterns include blunt trauma to the tracheobronchial tree, esophagus, diaphragm, heart, or aorta. Operative intervention is more often required to address these injuries.

A Novel Rabbit Model of Retained Hemothorax with Pleural Organization

Retained hemothorax (RH) is a commonly encountered and potentially severe complication of intrapleural bleeding that can organize with lung restriction. Early surgical intervention and intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy have been advocated. However, the lack of a reliable, cost-effective model amenable to interventional testing has hampered our understanding of the role of pharmacological interventions in RH management. Here, we report the development of a new RH model in rabbits. RH was induced by sequential administration of up to three doses of recalcified citrated homologous rabbit donor blood plus thrombin via a chest tube. RH at 4, 7, and 10 days post-induction (RH4, RH7, and RH10, respectively) was characterized by clot retention, intrapleural organization, and increased pleural rind, similar to that of clinical RH. Clinical imaging techniques such as ultrasonography and computed tomography (CT) revealed the dynamic formation and resorption of intrapleural clots over time and the resulting lung restriction. RH7 and RH10 were evaluated in young (3 mo) animals of both sexes. The RH7 recapitulated the most clinically relevant RH attributes; therefore, we used this model further to evaluate the effect of age on RH development. Sanguineous pleural fluids (PFs) in the model were generally small and variably detected among different models. The rabbit model PFs exhibited a proinflammatory response reminiscent of human hemothorax PFs. Overall, RH7 results in the consistent formation of durable intrapleural clots, pleural adhesions, pleural thickening, and lung restriction. Protracted chest tube placement over 7 d was achieved, enabling direct intrapleural access for sampling and treatment. The model, particularly RH7, is amenable to testing new intrapleural pharmacologic interventions, including iterations of currently used empirically dosed agents or new candidates designed to safely and more effectively clear RH.

Thoracostomy tube withdrawal during latter phases of expiration or inspiration: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

In patients with thoracic injuries, tube thoracostomy is routinely employed. There is disagreement over which manner of tube withdrawal is best, the latter phases of expiration or inspiration. Considering several earlier investigations' inconsistent findings, their comparative effectiveness is still up for debate. In light of this, we carried out a systematic analysis of studies contrasting the withdrawal of thoracostomy tubes during the latter stages of expiration versus inspiration for traumatic chest injuries. Analyzed outcomes are recurrent pneumothoraces, reinsertion of the thoracostomy tube, and hospital stay.

METHODS

We looked for papers comparing the withdrawal of the thoracostomy tube during the last stages of expiration and inspiration for the management of thoracic injuries on Embase, Pubmed, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar. Review Manager was used to determine mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR) using a 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

The primary outcomes showed no significant difference between the inspiration and expiration groups: recurrent pneumothorax (RR 1.27, 95% CI 0.83-1.93, P 0.28) and thoracostomy tube reinsertion (OR: 1.84, CI 0.50-6.86, P 0.36, I2 5%). However, the duration of hospital stay was significantly lower in patients in whom the thoracostomy tube was removed at the end of inspiration (RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.49-2.11, P < 0.00001, I2 0%). The implications of these findings warrant cautious interpretation, accounting for potential confounding factors and inherent limitations that may shape their significance.

CONCLUSION

The thoracostomy tube can be removed during both the end-expiratory and end-inspiratory stages of respiration with no appreciable difference. Nevertheless, caution should be exercised when ascertaining the implications of these findings, taking into account the potential limitations and confounding variables that may exert influence upon the outcomes.

Predictors of initial management failure in traumatic hemothorax: A prospective multicenter cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

Traumatic hemothorax is common, and management failure leads to worse outcomes. We sought to determine predictive factors and understand the role of trauma center performance in hemothorax management failure.

METHODS

We prospectively examined initial hemothorax management (observation, pleural drainage, surgery) and failure requiring secondary intervention in 17 trauma centers. We defined hemothorax management failure requiring secondary intervention as thrombolytic administration, tube thoracostomy, image-guided drainage, or surgery after failure of the initial management strategy at the discretion of the treating trauma surgeon. Patient-level predictors of hemothorax management failure requiring secondary intervention were identified for 2 subgroups: initial observation and immediate pleural drainage. Trauma centers were divided into quartiles by hemothorax management failure requiring secondary intervention rate and hierarchical logistic regression quantified variation.

RESULTS

Of 995 hemothoraces in 967 patients, 186 (19%) developed hemothorax management failure requiring secondary intervention. The frequency of hemothorax management failure requiring secondary intervention increased from observation to pleural drainage to surgical intervention (12%, 22%, and 35%, respectively). The number of ribs fractured (odds ratio 1.12 per fracture; 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.26) and pulmonary contusion (odds ratio 2.25, 95% confidence interval 1.03-4.91) predicted hemothorax management failure requiring secondary intervention in the observation subgroup, whereas chest injury severity (odds ratio 1.58; 95% confidence interval 1.17-2.12) and initial hemothorax volume evacuated (odds ratio 1.10 per 100 mL; 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.16) predicted hemothorax management failure requiring secondary intervention after pleural drainage. After adjusting for patient characteristics in the logistic regression model for hemothorax management failure requiring secondary intervention, patients treated at high hemothorax management failure requiring secondary intervention trauma centers were 6 times more likely to undergo an intervention after initial hemothorax management failure than patients treated in low hemothorax management failure requiring secondary intervention trauma centers (odds ratio 6.18, 95% confidence interval 3.41-11.21).

CONCLUSION

Failure of initial management of traumatic hemothorax is common and highly variable across trauma centers. Assessing patient selection for a given management strategy and center-level practices represent opportunities to improve outcomes from traumatic hemothorax.

[Occult and Retained Haemothorax - Recommendations of the Interdisciplinary Thoracic Trauma Task Group of the German Trauma Society (DGU - Section NIS) and the German Society for Thoracic Surgery (DGT)]

The management of occult and retained haemothorax is challenging for all involved in the care of polytrauma patients in terms of diagnosis and treatment. The focus of decision making is preventing sequelae such as pleural empyema and avoiding a trapped lung. An interdisciplinary task force of the German Society for Thoracic Surgery (DGT) and the German Trauma Society (DGU) on thoracic trauma offers recommendations for post-trauma care of patients with occult and/or retained haemothorax, as based on a comprehensive literature review.

Open versus percutaneous tube thoracostomy with and without thoracic lavage for traumatic hemothorax: a novel randomized controlled simulation trial

Objective

To quantify and assess the relative performance parameters of thoracic lavage and percutaneous thoracostomy (PT) using a novel, basic science 2×2 randomized controlled simulation trial.

Summary background data

Treatment of traumatic hemothorax (HTX) with open tube thoracostomy (TT) is painful and retained HTX is common. PT is potentially less painful whereas thoracic lavage may reduce retained HTX. Yet, procedural time and the feasibility of combining PT with lavage remain undefined.

Methods

A simulated partially clotted HTX (2%-gelatin-saline mixture) was loaded into a TT trainer and then evacuated after randomization to one of four protocols: TT+/-lavage or PT+/-lavage. Standardized inserts with fixed 28-Fr TT or 14-Fr PT positioning were used to minimize tube positioning variability. Lavage consisted of two 500 mL aliquots of warm saline after initial HTX evacuation. The primary outcome was HTX volume evacuated. The secondary outcome was additional procedural time required for the addition of the lavage.

Results

A total of 40 simulated HTX trials were randomized. TT alone evacuated a median of 1236 mL (IQR 1168, 1294) leaving a residual volume of 265 mL (IQR 206, 333). PT alone resulted in a significantly greater median residual volume of 588 mL (IQR 497, 646) (p=0.002). Adding lavage resulted in similar residual volumes for TT compared with TT alone but significantly less for PT compared with PT alone (p=0.002). Lavage increased procedural time for TT by a median of 7.0 min (IQR 6.5, 8.0) vs 11.7 min (IQR 10.2, 12.0) for PT (p<0.001).

Conclusion

This simulation trial characterized HTX evacuation in a standardized fashion. Adding lavage to thoracostomy placement may improve evacuation, particularly for small-diameter tubes, with little added procedural time. Further prospective clinical study is warranted.

Level of evidence

NA.

Optimal time to thoracoscopy for trauma patients with retained hemothorax

BACKGROUND

Retained hemothorax remains a common problem after thoracic trauma with associated morbidity and prolonged hospitalizations. The goal of this study was to examine the impact of time to video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) on pulmonary morbidity using a large, national data set.

METHODS

Patients undergoing VATS for retained hemothorax within the first 14 days postinjury were identified from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database over 5 years, ending in 2016. Demographics, mechanism, severity of injury, severity of shock, time to VATS, pulmonary morbidity, and mortality were recorded. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of pulmonary morbidity. Youden's index was then used to identify the optimal time to VATS.

RESULTS

From the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database, 3,546 patients were identified. Of these, 2,355 (66%) suffered blunt injury. The majority were male (81%) with a median age and Injury Severity Score of 46 and 16, respectively. The median time to VATS was 134 hours. Both pulmonary morbidity (13 vs 17%, P = .004) and hospital length of stay (9 vs 12 days, P < .0001) were significantly reduced in patients undergoing VATS before 3.9 days. Multivariable logistic regression identified VATS during the first 7 days as the only modifiable risk factor significantly associated with reduced pulmonary morbidity (odds ratio 0.52; 95% confidence interval 0.43-0.63, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing VATS for retained hemothorax have significant morbidity and prolonged length of stay. VATS within the first week of admission results in fewer pulmonary complications and shorter length of stay. In fact, the optimal time to VATS was identified as 3.9 days and was the only modifiable risk factor associated with decreased pulmonary morbidity.

Delayed tension hemothorax after chest trauma in children

Blunt chest injury is commonly observed in the Pediatric Emergency Department and Intensive Care Unit since up to 30% of children with traumatic injury sustain injury to the thorax. Differently from adults, who present with concomitant rib or sternoclavicular fractures in 70% of cases, more than half of childhood chest injuries occur without any bone fracture, mostly causing lung contusions. This lower rate of rib fractures and near absence of flail chest in children may be due to greater elasticity of the pediatric cartilaginous and bony skeleton. Whenever a rib fracture is present, underlying complications should be evaluated carefully (i.e., air leaks or blood effusions). Depending on the trauma mechanism, even minor injuries should raise the suspicion of pathologic bone fractures.