1
|
Barnes EL, Esckilsen S, Ashburn J, Barto A, Bloomfeld R, Cairns A, Mehta K, Patel P, Dziwis J, Dunn MS, Rahbar R, Sadiq TS, Hanson JS, Herfarth HH. Extensive Colitis and Smoking Are Associated With Postoperative Complications Within 30 Days of Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2024; 30:1326-1333. [PMID: 37607334 PMCID: PMC11291612 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izad177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our understanding of outcomes after proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC) is largely based on analyses of selected populations. We created a state-level registry to evaluate the epidemiology of IPAA surgery and pouch-related outcomes across the major healthcare systems performing these surgeries in our state. METHODS We created a retrospective cohort of all patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA for UC at 1 of 4 centers between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020. The primary outcomes of this study were the rate of complications and all-cause readmissions within the first 30 days of the final stage of IPAA surgery. RESULTS During the study period, 177 patients underwent IPAA surgery with 66 (37%) experiencing a complication within 30 days. After adjusting for the number of stages in IPAA surgery, patients with extensive UC (odds ratio, 3.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-9.33) and current or former smokers (odds ratio, 2.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-6.45) were more likely to experience a complication. Among all patients, 57 (32%) required readmission within 30 days. The most common reasons for readmission were ileus/small bowel obstruction (22%), peripouch abscess (19%), and dehydration (16%). CONCLUSION In this first state-level examination of the epidemiology of IPAA for UC, we demonstrated that the complication rate after IPAA for UC was 37%, with one-third of patients being readmitted within 30 days. Extensive disease at the time of colectomy appears to be an indicator of more severe disease and may portend a worse prognosis after IPAA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward L Barnes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Scott Esckilsen
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jean Ashburn
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Atrium Health at Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Amy Barto
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Richard Bloomfeld
- Section of Gastroenterology, Atrium Health at Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Ashley Cairns
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Atrium Health at Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Kurren Mehta
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Pooja Patel
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer Dziwis
- Section of Gastroenterology, Atrium Health at Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Michael S Dunn
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - John S Hanson
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Hans H Herfarth
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Pouchitis is an acute or chronic inflammatory disease of the ileal reservoir. It is common after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, and treatment of chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis has proven challenging. Most cases of acute pouchitis evolve into chronic pouchitis. The aetiology of acute pouchitis is likely to be partly related to the gut microbiota, whereas the pathophysiology of chronic pouchitis involves abnormal interactions between genetic disposition, faecal stasis, the gut microbiota, dysregulated host immunity, surgical techniques, ischaemia and mesentery-related factors. Pouchoscopy with biopsy is the most valuable modality for diagnosis, disease monitoring, assessment of treatment response, dysplasia surveillance and delivery of endoscopic therapy. Triggering or risk factors, such as Clostridioides difficile infection and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, should be modified or eradicated. In terms of treatment, acute pouchitis usually responds to oral antibiotics, whereas chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis often requires induction and maintenance therapy with integrin, interleukin or tumour necrosis factor inhibitors. Chronic pouchitis with ischaemic features, fistulae or abscesses can be treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Shen
- Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases and the Global Center for Integrated Colorectal Surgery and IBD Interventional Endoscopy, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maspero M, Hull TL. State of the Art: Pouch Surgery in the 21st Century. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:S1-S10. [PMID: 38441240 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An ileoanal pouch with IPAA is the preferred method to restore intestinal continuity in patients who require a total proctocolectomy. Pouch surgery has evolved during the past decades thanks to increased experience and research, changes in the medical management of patients who require an ileal pouch, and technological innovations. OBJECTIVE To review the main changes in pouch surgery over the past 2 decades, with a focus on staging, minimally invasive and transanal approaches, pouch design, and anastomotic configuration. RESULTS The decision on the staging approach depends on the patient's conditions, their indication for surgery, and the risk of anastomotic leak. A minimally invasive approach should be performed whenever feasible, but open surgery still has a role in this technically demanding operation. Transanal IPAA may be performed in experienced centers and may reduce conversion to open surgery in the hostile pelvis. The J-pouch is the easiest, fastest, and most commonly performed design, but other designs may be used when a J-pouch is not feasible. A stapled anastomosis without mucosectomy can be safely performed in the majority of cases, with a low incidence of rectal cuff neoplasia and better functional outcomes than handsewn. Finally, Crohn's disease is not an absolute contraindication to an ileoanal pouch, but pouch failure may be higher compared to other indications. CONCLUSIONS Many technical nuances contribute to the success of an ileoanal pouch. The current standard of care is a laparoscopic J-pouch with double-stapled anastomosis, but this should not be seen as a dogma, and the optimal approach and design should be tailored to each patient. See video from symposium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianna Maspero
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alves Martins BA, Shamsiddinova A, Alquaimi MM, Worley G, Tozer P, Sahnan K, Perry-Woodford Z, Hart A, Arebi N, Matharoo M, Warusavitarne J, Faiz O. Creation of an institutional preoperative checklist to support clinical risk assessment in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) considering ileoanal pouch surgery. Frontline Gastroenterol 2024; 15:203-213. [PMID: 38665796 PMCID: PMC11042438 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2023-102503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the most established restorative operative approach for patients with ulcerative colitis. It has associated morbidity and the potential for major repercussions on quality of life. As such, patient selection is crucial to its success. The main aim of this paper is to present an institutional preoperative checklist to support clinical risk assessment and patient selection in those considering IPAA. Methods A literature review was performed to identify the risk factors associated with surgical complications, decreased functional outcomes/quality of life, and pouch failure after IPAA. Based on this, a preliminary checklist was devised and modified through an iterative process. This was then evaluated by a consensus group comprising the pouch multidisciplinary team (MDT) core members. Results The final preoperative checklist includes assessment for risk factors such as gender, advanced age, obesity, comorbidities, sphincteric impairment, Crohn's disease and pelvic radiation therapy. In addition, essential steps in the decision-making process, such as pouch nurse counselling and discussion regarding surgical alternatives, are also included. The last step of the checklist is discussion at a dedicated pouch-MDT. Discussion A preoperative checklist may support clinicians with the selection of patients that are suitable for pouch surgery. It also serves as a useful tool to inform the discussion of cases at the MDT meeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Augusto Alves Martins
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Hospital Universitário de Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's the National Bowel Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Amira Shamsiddinova
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's the National Bowel Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Manal Mubarak Alquaimi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's the National Bowel Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
- Department of General Surgery, King Faisal University, Al-Hasa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Guy Worley
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's the National Bowel Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Phil Tozer
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's the National Bowel Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Kapil Sahnan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's the National Bowel Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Zarah Perry-Woodford
- Pouch and Stoma Care, St Mark's the National Bowel Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Ailsa Hart
- IBD Unit, St Mark's the National Bowel Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Naila Arebi
- IBD Unit, St Mark's the National Bowel Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Manmeet Matharoo
- Wolfson Endoscopy Unit, St Mark's the National Bowel Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
| | - Janindra Warusavitarne
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's the National Bowel Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Omar Faiz
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark's the National Bowel Hospital and Academic Institute, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Valvano M, Capannolo A, Cesaro N, Stefanelli G, Fabiani S, Frassino S, Monaco S, Magistroni M, Viscido A, Latella G. Nutrition, Nutritional Status, Micronutrients Deficiency, and Disease Course of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Nutrients 2023; 15:3824. [PMID: 37686856 PMCID: PMC10489664 DOI: 10.3390/nu15173824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
During the disease course, most Inflammatory Bowel Disease patients present a condition of malnutrition, undernutrition, or even overnutrition. These conditions are mainly due to suboptimal nutritional intake, alterations in nutrient requirements and metabolism, malabsorption, and excessive gastrointestinal losses. A suboptimal nutritional status and low micronutrient serum levels can have a negative impact on both induction and maintenance of remission and on the quality of life of Inflammatory Bowel Disease patients. We performed a systematic review including all the studies evaluating the connection between nutrition, nutrition status (including undernutrition and overnutrition), micronutrient deficiency, and both disease course and therapeutic response in Inflammatory Bowel Disease patients. This systematic review was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus. Four main clinical settings concerning the effect of nutrition on disease course in adult Inflammatory Bowel Disease patients were analyzed (induction of remission, maintenance of remission, risk of surgery, post-operative recurrence, and surgery-related complications). Four authors independently reviewed abstracts and manuscripts for eligibility. 6077 articles were found; 762 duplicated studies were removed. Out of 412 full texts analyzed, 227 were included in the review. The evidence summarized in this review showed that many nutritional aspects could be potential targets to induce a better control of symptoms, a deeper remission, and overall improve the quality of life of Inflammatory Bowel Disease patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Valvano
- Gastroenterology Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Piazzale Salvatore Tommasi 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; (N.C.); (S.F.); (S.F.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (A.V.); (G.L.)
- Division of Gastroenterology, Galliera Hospital, 16128 Genoa, Italy;
| | - Annalisa Capannolo
- Diagnostic and Surgical Endoscopy Unit, San Salvatore Academic Hospital, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;
| | - Nicola Cesaro
- Gastroenterology Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Piazzale Salvatore Tommasi 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; (N.C.); (S.F.); (S.F.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (A.V.); (G.L.)
| | | | - Stefano Fabiani
- Gastroenterology Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Piazzale Salvatore Tommasi 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; (N.C.); (S.F.); (S.F.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (A.V.); (G.L.)
| | - Sara Frassino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Piazzale Salvatore Tommasi 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; (N.C.); (S.F.); (S.F.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (A.V.); (G.L.)
| | - Sabrina Monaco
- Gastroenterology Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Piazzale Salvatore Tommasi 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; (N.C.); (S.F.); (S.F.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (A.V.); (G.L.)
| | - Marco Magistroni
- Gastroenterology Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Piazzale Salvatore Tommasi 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; (N.C.); (S.F.); (S.F.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (A.V.); (G.L.)
| | - Angelo Viscido
- Gastroenterology Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Piazzale Salvatore Tommasi 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; (N.C.); (S.F.); (S.F.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (A.V.); (G.L.)
| | - Giovanni Latella
- Gastroenterology Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Piazzale Salvatore Tommasi 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; (N.C.); (S.F.); (S.F.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (A.V.); (G.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Barnes EL, Allin KH, Iversen AT, Herfarth HH, Jess T. Increasing Incidence of Pouchitis Between 1996 and 2018: A Population-Based Danish Cohort Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21:192-199.e7. [PMID: 35525393 PMCID: PMC9636065 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Current knowledge regarding the epidemiology of pouchitis is based on highly selected, mostly single-center, patient cohorts. Our objective was to prospectively determine the population-based incidence of pouchitis in patients with ulcerative colitis in the first 2 years after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and analyze time trends of the incidence of pouchitis. METHODS Using national registries, we established a population-based cohort of all Danish patients undergoing proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis between 1996 and 2018. The primary outcome was the development of pouchitis within the first 2 years after surgery, evaluated by time period. We used Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard modeling to evaluate the time to development of pouchitis. RESULTS Overall, 1664 patients underwent an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. The cumulative incidence of pouchitis in the 2 years after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis increased throughout the study period, from 40% in the period from 1996 to 2000 (95% CI, 35%-46%) to 55% in the period from 2015 to 2018 (95% CI, 48%-63%). Patients undergoing surgery between 2015 and 2018 also showed an increased risk of pouchitis compared with the earliest study period (1996-2000) after adjusting for sex, age, and socioeconomic status (hazard ratio, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.20-2.05). CONCLUSIONS This population-based study showed a 15% absolute and 38% relative increase in the incidence of pouchitis among patients undergoing surgery between 1996 and 2018, with the greatest cumulative incidence of pouchitis shown in the most recent era (2015-2018). The striking increase in the incidence of pouchitis highlights the need for further research into causes and prevention of pouchitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward L Barnes
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | - Kristine H Allin
- Center for Molecular Prediction of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Aske T Iversen
- Center for Molecular Prediction of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hans H Herfarth
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Multidisciplinary Center for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Tine Jess
- Center for Molecular Prediction of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Castaño Llano R, Molina Meneses SP, Puerta JD, Escobar RM, Salazar Ochoa S, Puerta JE, Barreiro-de Acosta M. Ileal reservoir-associated complications in ulcerative colitis versus familial adenomatous polyposis: Impact on patient quality of life. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2023; 46:39-47. [PMID: 35605822 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2022.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir is the surgical procedure of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. OBJECTIVES To evaluate long-term postoperative complications (1994-2019) in patients operated for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and ulcerative colitis (UC) and the degree of satisfaction with the procedure. METHODS Observational study based on the analysis of a retrospective database with prospective follow-up in 115 consecutive patients: 79 with UC and 36 with FAP. A total of 88 patients were followed up, 60 with UC and 28 with PFA. RESULTS 48 males (54.4%) with a mean age of 44.8 ± 10.6 years were evaluated. Indications for surgery were intractable disease in 54 patients (47%), dysplasia/cancer in 43 (37%), severe bleeding in 4 (4%) and perforation in 3 (3%). A proctectomy and mucosectomy of the rectal stump was performed in 67 (76.1%), and a double stapling technique in 21. A protective ileostomy was performed in all patients with UC and FAP. No differences were found in early complications between the two groups. Late complications showed a higher rate of reservoritis in UC patients compared to FAP (44.9 vs. 14.3%, p = 0.001), with more refractory reservoritis in the UC group (13.3 vs. 0%, p = 0.04) with no differences in bowel obstruction, strictures, or anastomotic fistulas. Overall satisfaction and adaptation were considered good in 87% of UC patients and only 57% in the FAP group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir has comparable morbidity and mortality, except for the higher rate of reservoritis in patients with a history of UC, despite this contingency there is a better quality of life and greater acceptance of surgery in UC patients than in FAP patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Castaño Llano
- Grupo de Gastrohepatología, Universidad de Antioquia, Instituto de Cancerología, Las Américas-AUNA, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
| | | | - Juan Darío Puerta
- Clínica las Américas, Docencia en Cirugía, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
| | | | | | | | - Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta
- Unidad de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, España; Digestivo, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, España; Grupo Español de Trabajo en Enfermedad de Crohn y Colitis Ulcerosa (GETECCU), Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, España
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
DeLeon MF, Stocchi L. Elective and Emergent Surgery in the Ulcerative Colitis Patient. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2022; 35:437-444. [PMID: 36591393 PMCID: PMC9797282 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) requires surgical management in 20 to 30% of patients. Indications for surgery include medically refractory disease, dysplasia, cancer, and other complications of UC. Appropriate patient selection for timing and staging of surgery is paramount for optimal outcomes. Restorative proctocolectomy is the preferred standard of care and can afford many patients with excellent quality of life. There have been significant shifts in the treatment of UC-associated dysplasia, with less patients requiring surgery and more entering surveillance programs. There is ongoing controversy surrounding the management of UC-associated colorectal cancer and the techniques that should be used. This article reviews the most recent literature on the indications for elective and emergent surgical intervention for UC and the considerations behind the surgical options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Luca Stocchi
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Olortegui KS, Graham A, Hyman N. Staging Considerations for the Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:1531-1536. [PMID: 35469035 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05317-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ada Graham
- University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Neil Hyman
- University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcome of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis versus patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Tech Coloproctol 2022; 26:691-705. [PMID: 35357610 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02617-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is commonly used to restore gastrointestinal continuity after surgical treatment of mucosal ulcerative colitis (MUC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). The aim of the present systematic review was to compare the outcomes of patients with MUC and patients with FAP who underwent IPAA. METHODS A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant systematic review was performed. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through December 2021. Cohort and randomized studies were eligible for inclusion if they directly compared patients with MUC and FAP who underwent IPAA. The main outcome measures were pouch failure, complications, and need for pouch excision or revision. ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the risk of bias across the studies. A random-effect meta-analysis was conducted. RESULTS Twenty-three studies (9200 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. Seven thousand nine hundred fifty (86.4%) had MUC and 1250 (13.6%) had FAP. The median age of patients was 33.1 years. The male to female ratio was 1.4:1. MUC had higher odds of pouchitis (OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.8-5.4, p < 0.001), stricture (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.25-2.65, p = 0.002), fistula (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.18-2.54, p = 0.004), and total complications (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.3-2.77, p < 0.001) as compared to FAP. Both groups had similar odds of pelvic sepsis, leakage, pouch failure, excision, revision, and fecal incontinence. CONCLUSIONS Although patients with MUC undergoing IPAA may be at a higher risk of developing complications, particularly pouchitis, stricture, and fistula; the ultimate and functional outcome of the pouch is similar to patients with FAP. Pouch failure, excision and revision were similar in the two groups.
Collapse
|