1
|
Bernardi L, Roesel R, Aghayan DL, Majno-Hurst PE, De Dosso S, Cristaudi A. Preoperative chemotherapy in upfront resectable colorectal liver metastases: New elements for an old dilemma? Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 124:102696. [PMID: 38335813 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
The use of preoperative or "neoadjuvant" chemotherapy (NAC) has long been controversial for resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2023 guidelines on metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) indicate a combination of surgical/technical and oncologic/prognostic criteria as the two determinants for allocating patients to NAC or upfront hepatectomy. However, surgical and technical criteria have evolved, and oncologic prognostic criteria date from the pre-modern chemotherapy era and lack prospective validation. The traditional literature is interpreted as not supporting the use of NAC because several studies fail to demonstrate a benefit in overall survival (OS) compared to upfront surgery; however, OS may not be the most appropriate endpoint to consider. Moreover, the commonly quoted studies against NAC contain many limitations that may explain why NAC failed to demonstrate its value. The query of the recent literature focused primarily on other aspects than OS, such as surgical technique, the impact of side effects of chemotherapy, the histological growth pattern of metastases, or the detection of circulating tumor DNA, shows data that support a more widespread use of NAC. These should prompt a critical reappraisal of the use of NAC, leading to a more precise selection of patients who could benefit from it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Bernardi
- Department of Surgery, Lugano Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Tesserete 46, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Raffaello Roesel
- Department of Surgery, Lugano Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Tesserete 46, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Davit L Aghayan
- Department of Surgery, Ringerike Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway
| | - Pietro E Majno-Hurst
- Department of Surgery, Lugano Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Tesserete 46, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Southern Switzerland (USI), Via Buffi 13, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Sara De Dosso
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Southern Switzerland (USI), Via Buffi 13, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland; Medical Oncology Department, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via A. Gallino 12, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland.
| | - Alessandra Cristaudi
- Department of Surgery, Lugano Regional Hospital, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Tesserete 46, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of Southern Switzerland (USI), Via Buffi 13, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cotsoglou C, Granieri S, Bassetto S, Bagnardi V, Pugliese R, Grazi GL, Guglielmi A, Ruzzenente A, Aldrighetti L, Ratti F, De Carlis L, De Carlis R, Centonze L, De Angelis N, Memeo R, Delvecchio A, Felli E, Izzo F, Belli A, Patrone R, Ettorre GM, Berardi G, Di Benedetto F, Di Sandro S, Romano F, Garancini M, Scotti MA, Bianchi G, Germini A, Gjoni E, Bonomi A, Bruno F, Paleino S, Pugliese G. Dynamic surgical anatomy using 3D reconstruction technology in complex hepato-biliary surgery with vascular involvement. Results from an international multicentric survey. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:83-90. [PMID: 37838501 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Three-dimensional liver modeling can lead to substantial changes in choosing the type and extension of liver resection. This study aimed to explore whether 3D reconstruction helps to better understand the relationship between liver tumors and neighboring vascular structures compared to standard 2D CT scan images. METHODS Contrast-enhanced CT scan images of 11 patients suffering from primary and secondary hepatic tumors were selected. Twenty-three experienced HBP surgeons participated to the survey. A standardized questionnaire outlining 16 different vascular structures (items) having a potential relationship with the tumor was provided. Intraoperative and histopathological findings were used as the reference standard. The proper hypothesis was that 3D accuracy is greater than 2D. As a secondary endpoint, inter-raters' agreement was explored. RESULTS The mean difference between 3D and 2D, was 2.6 points (SE: 0.40; 95 % CI: 1.7-3.5; p < 0.0001). After sensitivity analysis, the results favored 3D visualization as well (mean difference 1.7 points; SE: 0.32; 95 % CI: 1.0-2.5; p = 0.0004). The inter-raters' agreement was moderate for both methods (2D: W = 0.45; 3D: W = 0.44). CONCLUSION 3D reconstruction may give a significant contribution to better understanding liver vascular anatomy and the precise relationship between the tumor and the neighboring structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Cotsoglou
- ASST-Brianza, Vimercate Hospital, Via Santi Cosma e Damiano 10, 20871, Vimercate, Italy.
| | - Stefano Granieri
- ASST-Brianza, Vimercate Hospital, Via Santi Cosma e Damiano 10, 20871, Vimercate, Italy
| | - Serena Bassetto
- Politecnico di Milano, Scuola di Ingegneria Industriale e Dell'informazione, Via Raffaele Lambruschini, 15, 20156, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Via Bicocca Degli Arcimboldi 8, 20126, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaele Pugliese
- AIMS Academy Clinical Research Network, Advanced International Mini-Invasive Surgery (AIMS) Academy, Milan, Italy
| | - Gian Luca Grazi
- Hepato-bilio-pancreatic Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, AOU Careggi, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Alfredo Guglielmi
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona, P. le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Ruzzenente
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Division of General and Hepato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona, P. le L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele and Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele and Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Luciano De Carlis
- Department of Transplantation, Division of General Surgery and Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo De Carlis
- Department of Transplantation, Division of General Surgery and Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; Ph.D. Course in Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Leonardo Centonze
- Department of Transplantation, Division of General Surgery and Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Nicola De Angelis
- Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, Paris, France
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva Delle Fonti, Italy
| | - Antonella Delvecchio
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva Delle Fonti, Italy
| | - Emanuele Felli
- Service Chirurgie Digestive et Transplantation Hépatique, Hôpital Trousseau CHU, 37170 Tours, France
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Belli
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Renato Patrone
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, 80131, Naples, Italy; DIETI Department, University of Naples Federico II, 80100, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
- Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liver Transplantation Center, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Giammauro Berardi
- Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liver Transplantation Center, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Stefano Di Sandro
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Romano
- General Surgery 1, Hepatobiliary Unit, IRCCS San Gerardo Dei Tintori, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900, Monza, Italy
| | - Mattia Garancini
- General Surgery 1, Hepatobiliary Unit, IRCCS San Gerardo Dei Tintori, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900, Monza, Italy
| | - Mauro Alessandro Scotti
- General Surgery 1, Hepatobiliary Unit, IRCCS San Gerardo Dei Tintori, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900, Monza, Italy
| | - Giorgio Bianchi
- Department of Digestive, Hepatobiliary and Endocrine Surgery, Hôpital Cochin, APHP Centre, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Alessandro Germini
- ASST-Brianza, Vimercate Hospital, Via Santi Cosma e Damiano 10, 20871, Vimercate, Italy
| | - Elson Gjoni
- ASST-Brianza, Vimercate Hospital, Via Santi Cosma e Damiano 10, 20871, Vimercate, Italy
| | | | - Federica Bruno
- ASST-Brianza, Vimercate Hospital, Via Santi Cosma e Damiano 10, 20871, Vimercate, Italy
| | - Sissi Paleino
- ASST-Brianza, Vimercate Hospital, Via Santi Cosma e Damiano 10, 20871, Vimercate, Italy
| | - Giacomo Pugliese
- AIMS Academy Clinical Research Network, Advanced International Mini-Invasive Surgery (AIMS) Academy, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Whitrock JN, Hartman SJ, Quillin RC, Shah SA. Liver Transplantation for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Is It Appropriate? Adv Surg 2023; 57:171-185. [PMID: 37536852 DOI: 10.1016/j.yasu.2023.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer with liver metastases is a condition with significant morbidity and mortality that affects many people around the world. Many treatments exist to target liver metastases, including surgical resection, chemotherapy, nonsurgical liver-directed therapies, and liver transplantation. The field of transplant oncology is emerging as a promising alternative to palliative chemotherapy alone in appropriately selected patients. Though few clinical trials have been completed to evaluate safety of liver transplant for colorectal cancer metastases, there are several ongoing trials to hopefully make transplant a viable option for more patients with limited options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna N Whitrock
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Medical Science Building Room 1555, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0558.
| | - Stephen J Hartman
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Medical Science Building Room 1555, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0558
| | - Ralph C Quillin
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Medical Science Building Room 1555, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0558
| | - Shimul A Shah
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Medical Science Building Room 1555, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0558
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Georgilis E, Gavriatopoulou M, Tsilimigras DI, Malandrakis P, Theodosopoulos T, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I. Optimizing Adjuvant Therapy after Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12062401. [PMID: 36983401 PMCID: PMC10051548 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12062401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The liver is the most common site of colorectal cancer metastatic spread. Although metastasectomy is the gold standard for fit patients with resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLMs), their management after surgical treatment remains controversial. The objective of this systematic review was to collate the currently available data of the agents used in the adjuvant setting in order to define the most optimal therapeutic strategy. A systematic review of the literature was conducted by searching PubMed/Medline and Cochrane library databases. We included studies that evaluated the efficacy, the tolerability and the safety profile of various chemotherapeutic agents that are used as adjuvant treatment after surgical resection of CRLMs. The outcomes of interest were regression-free survival (RFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and severe toxicities. From 543 initial articles, 29 publications with 7028 patients were finally included. In general, the results of the eligible studies indicated that adjuvant therapy after resection of CRLMs led to improved RFS/DFS rates, but this benefit did not contribute to a statistically significant prolongation of OS. Moreover, the choice of the therapeutic strategy, namely systematic or regional chemotherapy or the combination of both, did not seem to have a differential impact on patient outcomes. However, these results should be interpreted with caution since the majority of the chosen studies are of low or moderate quality. In this context, further high-quality clinical trials conducted on patient sub-populations with modern therapies are required in order to reduce in-study and between-study heterogeneity and determine which patients are expected to derive the maximum benefit from adjuvant therapy after surgery for CRLMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanouil Georgilis
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Maria Gavriatopoulou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Diamantis I Tsilimigras
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Panagiotis Malandrakis
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Theodosios Theodosopoulos
- Second Department of Surgery, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
The impact of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index on the outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who receive chemotherapy. Int J Clin Oncol 2023; 28:400-408. [PMID: 36637609 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-023-02293-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) is reported to be a prognosticator in various cancer patients with chemotherapy. However, the clinical impact of the ALI on treatment strategies in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients remains unclear. METHODS A total of 356 patients, who received first-line chemotherapy for mCRC between April 2005 and November 2019 in a single institution, were retrospectively enrolled. The association of pretreatment ALI (calculated as follows: BMI × albumin value/neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio) status with clinicopathological factors and patient survival outcome was analyzed, using subgroup analysis. RESULTS The ALI-low cases were significantly associated with female sex, more synchronous metastasis, multiple metastatic sites, less primary tumor resection, less liver resection after chemotherapy, and poor overall survival (OS). A multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis clarified that the ALI-low status was independently associated with poor OS (HR: 1.78, 95% CI 1.27-2.48, P = 0.001), in addition to right side tumor, multiple metastatic sites, and the non-performance of liver resection after chemotherapy. A subgroup analysis revealed that primary tumor resection and the resection of liver metastases after chemotherapy could not improve the prognosis of ALI-low cases in comparison with ALI-high cases, and the type of first-line chemotherapy did not significantly affect the association between the prognosis and the ALI status. CONCLUSION ALI comprehensively evaluates the prognostic host status and is a reliable prognosticator for the mCRC patients with chemotherapy. Calculating pretreatment ALI may serve as a cost-effective and easily available tool for constructing treatment strategies.
Collapse
|
6
|
Liatsou E, Tsilimigras DI, Malandrakis P, Gavriatopoulou M, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I. Current status and novel insights into the role of metastasectomy in the era of immunotherapy. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2023; 23:57-66. [PMID: 36527305 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2160323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION New perspectives on the role of metastasectomy have emerged along with the advances in cancer immunotherapy. Despite accumulating evidence that encourages the use of immunotherapy in the metastatic setting, current data regarding its combination with surgical resection of secondary lesions, as well as the best timeline and sequence of such a therapeutic approach is limited. AREAS COVERED We review the currently available literature on the role of metastasectomy in the era of novel immunotherapeutic agents and provide comprehensive evidence from ongoing trials about the available treatment strategies. In metastatic melanoma, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) play a key role both in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting to achieve long-term disease control. In metastatic renal cell carcinoma, investigation is ongoing regarding the emerging role of ICIs before metastasectomy. ICIs have improved outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal and head and neck cancer. EXPERT OPINION In the neoadjuvant setting, the high response rates and the durability of responses to immunotherapy may enable the resectability of metastatic lesions. In the adjuvant setting post metastasectomy, immunotherapy constitutes a safe and efficacious approach to support immune tumor surveillance and delay or even prevent disease relapse. Patient participation in relevant clinical trials should be encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Efstathia Liatsou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Diamantis I Tsilimigras
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, USA
| | - Panagiotis Malandrakis
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Maria Gavriatopoulou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Anselmo A, Cascone C, Siragusa L, Sensi B, Materazzo M, Riccetti C, Bacchiocchi G, Ielpo B, Rosso E, Tisone G. Disappearing Colorectal Liver Metastases: Do We Really Need a Ghostbuster? Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10101898. [PMID: 36292345 PMCID: PMC9602313 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10101898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The development of new systemic treatment strategies has resulted in a significant increase in the response rates of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) in the last few years. Although the radiological response is a favorable prognostic factor, complete shrinkage of CRLM, known as disappearing liver metastases (DLM), presents a therapeutic dilemma, and proper management is still debated in the literature. In fact, DLM is not necessarily equal to cure, and when resected, pathological examination reveals in more than 80% of patients a variable percentage of the tumor as residual disease or early recurrence in situ. Moreover, while a higher incidence of intrahepatic recurrence is documented in small series when surgery is avoided, its clinical significance for long-term OS is still under investigation. In light of this, a multidisciplinary approach and, in particular, radiologists’ role is needed to assist the surgeon in the management of DLM, thanks to emerging technology and strategy. Therefore, the aim of this review is to provide an overview of the DLM phenomenon and current management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Anselmo
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Roma, Italy
| | - Chiara Cascone
- Department of Surgery, University Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Roma, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-348-445-7000
| | - Leandro Siragusa
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Roma, Italy
| | - Bruno Sensi
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Roma, Italy
| | - Marco Materazzo
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Roma, Italy
| | - Camilla Riccetti
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Roma, Italy
| | - Giulia Bacchiocchi
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Roma, Italy
| | - Benedetto Ielpo
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Hospital del Mar. Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona, 08003 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Edoardo Rosso
- Unité des Maladies de l’Appareil Digestif et Endocrine, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, 1210 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Giuseppe Tisone
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sanuki N, Takeda A, Tsurugai Y, Eriguchi T. Role of stereotactic body radiotherapy in multidisciplinary management of liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer. Jpn J Radiol 2022; 40:1009-1016. [PMID: 35857212 PMCID: PMC9529716 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-022-01307-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
In the treatment of colorectal cancer patients with distant metastases, the development of new anticancer agents has considerably prolonged progression-free survival. Such survival benefits attributed to chemotherapy have increased the relative significance of local therapy in patients with limited metastases. The liver is recognized as the most common site of metastasis of colorectal cancer because of the intestinal mesenteric drainage to the portal veins. Hepatic resection of isolated liver metastases of colorectal cancer is the only option for a potential cure. However, hepatic metastases are resectable in only approximately 20% of the patients. For remaining patients with high-risk resectable liver metastases or those who are unfit for surgery, less invasive, local therapies including radiation therapy (stereotactic body radiation therapy, SBRT) may have a potential role in treatment. Although the local control rate of SBRT for colorectal liver metastases has room for improvement, its less-invasive nature and broad indications deserve consideration. Future research should include SBRT dose escalation or the selection of patients who benefit from local ablative therapies. SBRT may offer an alternative, non-invasive approach for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases in a multidisciplinary treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoko Sanuki
- Department of Radiology, Yokkaichi Municipal Hospital, 2-2-37, Shibata, Yokkaichi, Mie, 510-8567, Japan.
- Radiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, 6-2-24, Ofuna, Kamakura, Kanagawa, 247-0056, Japan.
| | - Atsuya Takeda
- Radiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, 6-2-24, Ofuna, Kamakura, Kanagawa, 247-0056, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Tsurugai
- Radiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, 6-2-24, Ofuna, Kamakura, Kanagawa, 247-0056, Japan
| | - Takahisa Eriguchi
- Radiation Oncology Center, Ofuna Chuo Hospital, 6-2-24, Ofuna, Kamakura, Kanagawa, 247-0056, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vaz da Silva DG, Bredt LC, Diniz AL, Vieira VHR, Fernandes PHS, Ribeiro R, Ribeiro HC, Oliveira AF. Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology surgical standards for resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. J Surg Oncol 2022; 126:28-36. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.26879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Revised: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Diego G. Vaz da Silva
- Commission on Hepatobiliary Cancer Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology Mário Covas State Hospital, Centro Universitário Faculdade de Medicina do ABC Santo André São Paulo Brazil
| | - Luis C. Bredt
- Commission on Hepatobiliary Cancer Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná Cascavel Paraná Brazil
| | - Alessandro L. Diniz
- Commission on Hepatobiliary Cancer Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil
- Department of Upper GI and HPB Surgical Oncology AC Camargo Cancer Center São Paulo São Paulo Brazil
| | - Victor H. R. Vieira
- Commission on Hepatobiliary Cancer Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology Rede D'Or São Luiz, Hospital Federal de Bonsucesso Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil
| | - Paulo H. S. Fernandes
- Commission on Hepatobiliary Cancer Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology Universidade Federal de Uberlândia Uberlândia Minas Gerais Brazil
| | - Reitan Ribeiro
- Commission on Hepatobiliary Cancer Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology Erasto Gaertner Hospital Curitiba Paraná Brazil
| | - Héber S. C. Ribeiro
- Commission on Hepatobiliary Cancer Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil
- Department of Upper GI and HPB Surgical Oncology AC Camargo Cancer Center São Paulo São Paulo Brazil
| | - Alexandre F. Oliveira
- Commission on Hepatobiliary Cancer Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil
- Department of Surgery Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora Juiz de Fora Minas Gerais Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
The Influence of Radiological “Disappearing Lesions” on the Efficacy and Prognosis of Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases Undergoing Conversion Therapy. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2022; 2022:2200598. [PMID: 35242182 PMCID: PMC8888111 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2200598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of the current study was to analyze the influence of radiological “disappearing liver metastasis” (DLM) on the efficacy and prognosis of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) undergoing conversion therapy. Methods Patients with CRLM by the multidisciplinary team (MDT) of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were retrospectively enrolled from January 2014 to January 2021. The relationship between the occurrence and recurrence of DLM and different clinical factors was analyzed. Results Thirty-five of the 113 patients (31.0%) with initially unresectable CRLM developed DLM, and of the 361 lesions, 177 disappeared (49.0%). Within 6 months, 6-12 months, and 12-24 months groups, the recurrence rate was 3.4%, 16.8%, and 34.8%, but there is no recurrence in after 24 months group. There was a statistical difference between chemotherapy alone and chemotherapy combined with the targeted therapy group on the occurrence of DLM (58.3% vs. 37.1%, P < 0.001). There were significant differences between <5 mm group and >10 mm group on occurrence of DLM(76.7% vs. 30.4%, P < 0.001) and between 5-10 mm group and >10 mm group also (70.0% vs. 30.4%, P < 0.001). Through univariate and multivariate analyses, it was concluded that age (P = 0.026, 95%CI = 3.690) and treatment regimens (P = 0.033, 95%CI = 2.703) had a significant influence on the progression-free survival (PFS) time of DLM. Conclusion Younger patients, who use chemotherapy alone to achieve a therapeutic effect, might have better survival benefits when the lesions do not progress within 2 years after the appearance of DLMs.
Collapse
|
11
|
Nassar A, Cimpean S, Abdelhamid A, Jones RP, Wahba R, Fiorentini G, Aldrighetti L, Teh C, Alikhanov R, Hammond J, Silva M, Abdelmabod A, Truant S, Ferrero A, Sturesson C, Ahmed I, Ghazanfar M, Takemura N, Pawlik TM, Bekheit M. OUP accepted manuscript. BJS Open 2022; 6:6590408. [PMID: 35598157 PMCID: PMC9124362 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Nassar
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
- Department of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Scotland, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Sorin Cimpean
- Department of Surgery, CHU - St Pierre, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Amir Abdelhamid
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
- Department of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Scotland, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Robert P. Jones
- Northwest Hepatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Roger Wahba
- Departement of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Guido Fiorentini
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, USA
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Catherine Teh
- Department of Surgery, Makati Medical Center, Makati Metro Manila, Philippines
- Department of Surgery, National Kidney & Transplant Institute, Quezon, Philippines
- Department of Surgery, St Luke’s Medical Center, Quezon, Philippines
| | - Ruslan Alikhanov
- Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Department of liver and pancreatic surgery and Transplantation, Russia
| | - John Hammond
- Department of HPB and Transplantation, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle, UK
| | - Michael Silva
- Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Areeg Abdelmabod
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
- Department of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Scotland, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Stephanie Truant
- Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille: Lille, Nord-Pas-de-Calais, Lille, France
| | | | - Christian Sturesson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Irfan Ahmed
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
- Department of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Scotland, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Mudassar Ghazanfar
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
- Department of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Scotland, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Nobuyuki Takemura
- Department of Surgery, National Center for Global Health and Medicine (NCGM), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Timothy M. Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Ohio, USA
| | - Mohamed Bekheit
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
- Department of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Scotland, Aberdeen, UK
- Surgical Unit, HPB Integrated Center of Care, Elite Integrated Centers of Excellence, Alexandria, Egypt
- Correspondence to: Mohamed Bekheit, Department of Surgery, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Department of Surgery, Foresthill Health Campus, Aberdeen AB252ZN, UK (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kim J, Han MC, Chang JS, Hong CS, Kim KH, Byun HK, Park RH, Koom WS, Park SY, Kim JS. Development of a Margin Determination Framework for Tumor-Tracking Radiation Therapy With Intraoperatively Implanted Fiducial Markers. Front Oncol 2021; 11:753246. [PMID: 34692536 PMCID: PMC8529155 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.753246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop an internal target volume (ITV) margin determination framework (or decision-supporting framework) for treating multiple lung metastases using CyberKnife Synchrony with intraoperatively implanted fiducial markers (IIFMs). The feasibility of using non-ideally implanted fiducial markers (a limited number and/or far from a target) for tracking-based lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) was investigated. METHODS In the developed margin determination framework, an optimal set of IIFMs was determined to minimize a tracking uncertainty-specific ITV (ITVtracking) margin (margin required to cover target-to-marker motion discrepancy), i.e., minimize the motion discrepancies between gross tumor volume (GTV) and the selected set of fiducial markers (FMs). The developed margin determination framework was evaluated in 17 patients with lung metastases. To automatically calculate the respiratory motions of the FMs, a template matching-based FM tracking algorithm was developed, and GTV motion was manually measured. Furthermore, during-treatment motions of the selected FMs were analyzed using log files and compared with those calculated using 4D CTs. RESULTS For 41 of 42 lesions in 17 patients (97.6%), an optimal set of the IIFMs was successfully determined, requiring an ITVtracking margin less than 5 mm. The template matching-based FM tracking algorithm calculated the FM motions with a sub-millimeter accuracy compared with the manual measurements. The patient respiratory motions during treatment were, on average, significantly smaller than those measured at simulation for the patient cohort considered. CONCLUSION Use of the developed margin determination framework employing CyberKnife Synchrony with a limited number of IIFMs is feasible for lung SABR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jihun Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Min Cheol Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jee Suk Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chae-Seon Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyung Hwan Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hwa Kyung Byun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ryeong Hwang Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Woong Sub Koom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seong Yong Park
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jin Sung Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zeyara A, Torén W, Søreide K, Andersson R. The liver-first approach for synchronous colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of completion rates and effects on survival. Scand J Surg 2021; 111:14574969211030131. [PMID: 34605325 DOI: 10.1177/14574969211030131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients presenting with synchronous colorectal liver metastases are increasingly being considered for a curative treatment, and the liver-first approach is gaining popularity in this context. However, little is known about the completion rates of the liver-first approach and its effects on survival. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis of liver-first strategy for colorectal liver metastasis. The primary outcome was an assessment of the completion rates of the liver-first approach. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, causes of non-completion, and clinicopathologic data. RESULTS Seventeen articles were amenable for inclusion and the total study population was 1041. The median completion rate for the total population was 80% (range 20-100). The median overall survival for the completion and non-completion groups was 45 (range 12-69) months and 13 (range 10.5-25) months, respectively. Metadata showed a significant survival benefit for the completion group, with a univariate hazard ratio of 12.0 (95% confidence interval, range 5.7-24.4). The major cause of non-completion (76%) was liver disease progression before resection of the primary tumor. Pearson tests showed significant negative correlation between median number of lesions and median size of the largest metastasis and completion rate. CONCLUSIONS The liver-first approach offers a complete resection to most patients enrolled, with an overall survival benefit when completion can be assured. One-fifth fails to return to intended oncologic therapy and the major cause is interim metastatic progression, most often in the liver. Risk of non-completion is related to a higher number of lesions and large metastases. The majority of studies stem from primary rectal cancers, which may influence on the return to intended oncologic therapy as well.PROSPERO id no: 170459.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Zeyara
- Department of Surgery, Ystad Hospital, Ystad, Sweden Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - William Torén
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, SwedenKjetil Søreide
| | - Kjetil Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Roland Andersson
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund SE-222 42, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fergadi MP, Magouliotis DE, Vlychou M, Rountas C, Athanasiou T, Zacharoulis D. A meta-analysis evaluating contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound (CE-IOUS) in the context of surgery for colorectal liver metastases. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:4178-4188. [PMID: 33969446 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03096-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to assess the outcomes of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound (CE-IOUS) for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) undergoing surgery. METHOD A thorough literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The Odds Ratio, Weighted Mean Difference, and 95% Confidence Interval were evaluated, by means of Random-Effects model. RESULTS Eleven articles met the inclusion criteria and incorporated 497 patients. The present study shows that CE-IOUS is associated with higher sensitivity and accuracy compared with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) in identifying CRLMs (p < 0.05). The positive predictive value was similar among the different modalities. Furthermore, new CRLMs were identified by CE-IOUS, thus affecting the surgical plan in 128 patients (51.8% of the patients with new CRLMs). Moreover, 91 patients (71%) underwent a more extensive hepatectomy and 15 patients (11.7%) were considered non-operable. Two alternative contrast agents, Sonazoid and Sonovue, were employed with similar sensitivity (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION These outcomes suggest the superiority of the CE-IOUS over MDCT, MRI, and IOUS for the staging of patients with CRLMs undergoing surgery. However, they should be treated with caution given the small number of the included studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria P Fergadi
- Department of Radiology, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, 41110, Larissa, Greece
| | - Dimitrios E Magouliotis
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, UCL, London, UK
- Department of Surgery, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, 41110, Larissa, Greece
| | - Marianna Vlychou
- Department of Radiology, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, Larissa, Greece
| | - Christos Rountas
- Department of Radiology, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, Larissa, Greece
| | - Thanos Athanasiou
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, W2 1NY, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Melstrom LG, Warner SG, Wong P, Sun V, Raoof M, Singh G, Chavin KD, Fong Y, Adam R, Hugh TJ. Management of disappearing colorectal liver metastases: an international survey. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:506-511. [PMID: 33144051 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Revised: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improved chemotherapy response rates have lead to "disappearing" colorectal liver metastases (dCRLM). We aim to assess management patterns of dCRLM from an international body of hepatobiliary surgeons. METHODS A survey was designed, tested for item relevance, readability and content validity, and distributed to the AHPBA, IHPBA and ANZHPBA. RESULTS The majority of 226 respondents were <15 years from training (69%), practiced in academia (82%) and devoted >50% of their practice to hepatobiliary (75%). Surgeons utilize CT(45%) or MRI(47%) for preoperative planning with a preferred imaging interval of <6 weeks. Nearly all have experienced dCRLM (99%) and 63% of surgeons have waited a few months to assess for durability of response prior to definitive surgical/ablative therapy. Only 24% place fiducial markers for lesions <1-cm prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Intra-operatively, 97% of surgeons perform ultrasound, and 71% ablation. When a tumor has "disappeared," 49% elect for observation and 31% resect if the dCRLM is superficial. Of those electing observation, 87% believe there is effective treatment with progression on surveillance imaging. CONCLUSIONS Nearly all surgeons have experienced dCRLM with half choosing observation over intervention due to the belief that these lesions may be re-addressed in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laleh G Melstrom
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center Department of Surgery, USA.
| | - Susanne G Warner
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center Department of Surgery, USA
| | - Paul Wong
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center Department of Surgery, USA
| | - Virginia Sun
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center Department of Population Sciences, USA
| | - Mustafa Raoof
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center Department of Surgery, USA
| | - Gagandeep Singh
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center Department of Surgery, USA
| | | | - Yuman Fong
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center Department of Surgery, USA
| | - Rene Adam
- Paul-Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris Department of Surgery, France
| | - Thomas J Hugh
- University of Sydney, Department of Surgery, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Evolution of Surgical Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Real World: Single Center Experience in 1212 Cases. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13051178. [PMID: 33803257 PMCID: PMC7967178 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13051178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has undergone significant evolution thanks to technical improvements as well as oncological advances, which have been the subject of targeted studies aimed at understanding the details of this heterogeneous disease. The purpose of this study is to put together pieces of this complex scenario by providing an overview of the evolution that has occurred in the context of a single center within a multidisciplinary management approach. METHODS Between 2005 and 2020, 1212 resections for CRLM were performed at the Hepatobiliary Surgery Division of San Raffaele Hospital, Milan. The series was divided into three historical periods, which were compared in terms of disease characteristics and short- and long-term outcomes: Period 1, 2005-2009 (293 cases); Period 2, 2010-2014 (353 cases); Period 3, 2015-2020 (566 cases). The trends for surgical technical complexity, oncological burden of the disease, use of the laparoscopic approach and use of techniques for hepatic hypertrophy were analyzed year by year. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with inclusion to a laparoscopic approach and with long-term prognosis. RESULTS The number of resections performed over the years progressively increased, with an increase in the number of cases with a high Clinical Risk Score and a high profile of technical complexity. The proportion of cases performed laparoscopically increased, but less rapidly compared to other malignant tumors. The risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality was similar in the three analyzed periods. Long-term survival, stratified by Clinical Risk Score, improved in Period 3, while overall survival remained unchanged. CONCLUSION The cultural background, the maturation of technical expertise and the consolidation of the multidisciplinary team have resulted in safe expansion of the possibility to offer a curative opportunity to patients, while continuously implementing into clinical practice evidence provided by the literature.
Collapse
|
17
|
Francone E, Gentilli S, Santori G, Stabilini C, Fornaro R, Frascio M. MicroRNAs differential expression profile in metastatic colorectal cancer: A pilot study with literature review. Surg Oncol 2021; 37:101524. [PMID: 33556883 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Revised: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Colorectal cancer is still one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide and specific tools to improve disease assessment and treatment response are advocated. The aim of this study was to analyze miRNAs expression in metastatic and non-metastatic colorectal cancer, in order to identify reliable biomarkers suitable for prognosis, treatment and patient's monitoring. MATERIAL AND METHODS Among 25 patients (mean age 71 ± 12 years; Female/Male: 12/13) submitted to laparoscopic colorectal resection between August 2017 and February 2019, miRNAs were extracted from fresh frozen tissues of solid tumors. Gene expression's analysis arising from microarray technology was performed. RESULTS Pathological evaluation identified 15 metastatic patients (8 presenting with stage III and 7 with stage IV cancers) and 10 non-metastatic patients (4 presenting with stage I and 6 stage II cancers). Bioinformatic analysis of solid biopsies revealed 16 miRNAs (11 upregulated and 5 downregulated) differently expressed between metastatic and non-metastatic groups, with three miRNAs (miR-7515, miR-7109-5p and miR-6831-5p) never linked to colorectal cancer before. CONCLUSIONS Our study showed an association between miRNAs and metastatic colorectal cancer, suggesting their potential role as biomarkers for tumor management, if confirmed by further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Francone
- Department of Health Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
| | - Sergio Gentilli
- Department of Health Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Gregorio Santori
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Cesare Stabilini
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Rosario Fornaro
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Marco Frascio
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Koh DM, Ba-Ssalamah A, Brancatelli G, Fananapazir G, Fiel MI, Goshima S, Ju SH, Kartalis N, Kudo M, Lee JM, Murakami T, Seidensticker M, Sirlin CB, Tan CH, Wang J, Yoon JH, Zeng M, Zhou J, Taouli B. Consensus report from the 9 th International Forum for Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging: applications of gadoxetic acid-enhanced imaging. Eur Radiol 2021; 31:5615-5628. [PMID: 33523304 PMCID: PMC8270799 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07637-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Objectives The 9th International Forum for Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was held in Singapore in September 2019, bringing together radiologists and allied specialists to discuss the latest developments in and formulate consensus statements for liver MRI, including the applications of gadoxetic acid–enhanced imaging. Methods As at previous Liver Forums, the meeting was held over 2 days. Presentations by the faculty on days 1 and 2 and breakout group discussions on day 1 were followed by delegate voting on consensus statements presented on day 2. Presentations and discussions centered on two main meeting themes relating to the use of gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI in primary liver cancer and metastatic liver disease. Results and conclusions Gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI offers the ability to monitor response to systemic therapy and to assist in pre-surgical/pre-interventional planning in liver metastases. In hepatocellular carcinoma, gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI provides precise staging information for accurate treatment decision-making and follow-up post therapy. Gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI also has potential, currently investigational, indications for the functional assessment of the liver and the biliary system. Additional voting sessions at the Liver Forum debated the role of multidisciplinary care in the management of patients with liver disease, evidence to support the use of abbreviated imaging protocols, and the importance of standardizing nomenclature in international guidelines in order to increase the sharing of scientific data and improve the communication between centers. Key Points • Gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI is the preferred imaging method for pre-surgical or pre-interventional planning for liver metastases after systemic therapy. • Gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI provides accurate staging of HCC before and after treatment with locoregional/biologic therapies. • Abbreviated protocols for gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI offer potential time and cost savings, but more evidence is necessary. The use of gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI for the assessment of liver and biliary function is under active investigation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-020-07637-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dow-Mu Koh
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK.
| | - Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Giuseppe Brancatelli
- Dipartimento di Biomedicina, Neuroscienze e Diagnostica avanzata (BiND), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | | | - M Isabel Fiel
- Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Satoshi Goshima
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Sheng-Hong Ju
- Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| | - Nikolaos Kartalis
- Department of Radiology Huddinge, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Division of Radiology, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Masatoshi Kudo
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Jeong Min Lee
- Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Takamichi Murakami
- Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Claude B Sirlin
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Cher Heng Tan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jin Wang
- Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat Sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jeong Hee Yoon
- Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mengsu Zeng
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Jian Zhou
- Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Bachir Taouli
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular, and Interventional Radiology, BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hewitt DB, Pawlik TM, Cloyd JM. Who Will Benefit? Using Radiomics to Predict Response to Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:2931-2933. [PMID: 33475881 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09586-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Brock Hewitt
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chen Q, Li X, Zhao J, Bi X, Li Z, Huang Z, Zhang Y, Zhou J, Zhao H, Cai J. What is the optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases? ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:7. [PMID: 33553300 PMCID: PMC7859783 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-4289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background The optimal number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) cycles for resectable colorectal liver oligometastases (CLOM) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal number of NAC cycles. Methods One hundred twenty-nine consecutive patients were included in this study. X-tile analysis was implemented to investigate the optimal cut-off point for NAC cycles. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce selection bias. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox risk regression models were used to analyse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results The optimal cut-off point for NAC cycles was 5. There were no significant differences in R0 resection, pathological response or postoperative complications between the groups with a low number of NAC cycles group (≤5 cycles, n=80) and high number of NAC cycles (>5 cycles, n=49). Patients with a high number of NAC cycles were more likely to have NAC toxicity than those with a low number of cycles (87.8% vs. 65.0%, P=0.004). Multivariate analysis revealed that >5 NAC cycles was an independent predictor of reduced PFS (HR =1.808, 95% CI: 1.205–2.712, P=0.004) and reduced OS (HR =1.723, 95% CI: 1.041–2.851, P=0.034). In the oxaliplatin-based regimen group, patients with a low number of NAC cycles had a better PFS (P<0.001, mPFS: 14.7 vs. 5.4 months) and better OS (P=0.018, mOS: 57.7 months vs. 41.0 months) than those with a high number of cycles. After 1:1 propensity matching (34 cases vs. 34 cases), multivariate analysis revealed that >5 NAC cycles was an independent predictor of reduced PFS (HR =2.265, 95% CI: 1.281–4.007, P=0.005) and reduced OS (HR =2.813, 95% CI: 1.359–5.822, P=0.005). In the oxaliplatin-based regimen group, patients with a low number of NAC cycles had better PFS (P<0.001, mPFS: 17.5 vs. 5.6 months) and better OS (P=0.008, mOS: 59.0 vs. 31.8 months) than those with a high number of cycles. Conclusions Fewer than 5 NAC cycles was optimal for biologically resectable CLOM patients. Giving more than 5 NAC cycles was unnecessary because a higher number of NAC cycles has more unfavourable survival and higher NAC toxicities, while leading to similar R0 resection rates and pathological responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qichen Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xingchen Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianjun Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xinyu Bi
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiyu Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhen Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yefan Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianguo Zhou
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hong Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianqiang Cai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Liu W, Zhang ZY, Yin SS, Yan K, Xing BC. Contrast-Enhanced Intraoperative Ultrasound Improved Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value in Colorectal Liver Metastasis: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:3763-3773. [PMID: 33247361 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09365-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The diagnostic accuracy of imaging modalities in colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) has improved in recent years, therefore the role of current imaging techniques needs to be defined. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging, preoperative imaging (magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography), intraoperative ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound in the detection of CRLM. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eligible trials published before 30 March 2020 were identified from the EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases, and descriptive and quantitative data were extracted. Study quality was evaluated for the identified studies and a random-effects model was used to determine the integrated diagnosis estimation. Meta-regression was implemented to explore the possible contributors to heterogeneity. RESULTS Overall, 13 studies were included for analysis, comprising 682 patients with a total of 2303 liver lesions. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound were 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-0.97), 0.83 (95% CI 0.67-0.92), and 79 (95% CI 32-196), respectively. The overall weighted area under the curve was 0.96 (95% CI 0.94-0.97). In univariate meta-regression analysis, disappearing liver metastasis, contrast agent, and Kupffer phase were the potent sources of heterogeneity; however, in multivariate meta-regression, no definite variable was the source of the study heterogeneity. CONCLUSION Contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasound demonstrated a high sensitivity and specificity for screening CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Liu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Peking University, Ministry of Education, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhong-Yi Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Department of Ultrasonography, School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Peking University, Ministry of Education, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Shan-Shan Yin
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Department of Ultrasonography, School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Peking University, Ministry of Education, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Kun Yan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Department of Ultrasonography, School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Peking University, Ministry of Education, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
| | - Bao-Cai Xing
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department I, School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital and Institute, Peking University, Ministry of Education, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Martin J, Petrillo A, Smyth EC, Shaida N, Khwaja S, Cheow HK, Duckworth A, Heister P, Praseedom R, Jah A, Balakrishnan A, Harper S, Liau S, Kosmoliaptsis V, Huguet E. Colorectal liver metastases: Current management and future perspectives. World J Clin Oncol 2020; 11:761-808. [PMID: 33200074 PMCID: PMC7643190 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i10.761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The liver is the commonest site of metastatic disease for patients with colorectal cancer, with at least 25% developing colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) during the course of their illness. The management of CRLM has evolved into a complex field requiring input from experienced members of a multi-disciplinary team involving radiology (cross sectional, nuclear medicine and interventional), Oncology, Liver surgery, Colorectal surgery, and Histopathology. Patient management is based on assessment of sophisticated clinical, radiological and biomarker information. Despite incomplete evidence in this very heterogeneous patient group, maximising resection of CRLM using all available techniques remains a key objective and provides the best chance of long-term survival and cure. To this end, liver resection is maximised by the use of downsizing chemotherapy, optimisation of liver remnant by portal vein embolization, associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy, and combining resection with ablation, in the context of improvements in the functional assessment of the future remnant liver. Liver resection may safely be carried out laparoscopically or open, and synchronously with, or before, colorectal surgery in selected patients. For unresectable patients, treatment options including systemic chemotherapy, targeted biological agents, intra-arterial infusion or bead delivered chemotherapy, tumour ablation, stereotactic radiotherapy, and selective internal radiotherapy contribute to improve survival and may convert initially unresectable patients to operability. Currently evolving areas include biomarker characterisation of tumours, the development of novel systemic agents targeting specific oncogenic pathways, and the potential re-emergence of radical surgical options such as liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Martin
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Angelica Petrillo
- Department of Precision Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Napoli 80131, Italy, & Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, 80147 Napoli Italy
| | - Elizabeth C Smyth
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Nadeem Shaida
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB22 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Samir Khwaja
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB22 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - HK Cheow
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Adam Duckworth
- Department of Pathology, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Paula Heister
- Department of Pathology, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Raaj Praseedom
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Asif Jah
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Anita Balakrishnan
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Harper
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Siong Liau
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Vasilis Kosmoliaptsis
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Emmanuel Huguet
- Department of Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research and Academic Health Sciences Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Tsilimigras DI, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Moris D, Pawlik TM. Liver Tumor Microenvironment. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2020; 1296:227-241. [PMID: 34185296 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-59038-3_14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The tumor microenvironment (TME) has recently been recognized as an important part of tumor development and growth. TME is a dynamic system orchestrated by immune, cancer and inflammatory cells, as well as the stromal tissue and surrounding extracellular matrix. While TME of primary hepatic tumors is usually characterized by a strong inflammatory background, the TME of liver metastases typically consists of otherwise healthy liver tissue. Chronic inflammation and hypoxia are key to the development and progression of primary liver cancer. The injury caused by chronic inflammation creates a condition of immune evasion that initiates a cascade of events that eventually leads to liver carcinogenesis.With liver metastases, primary tumors "prime" the target organs via secreting factors that induce expansion of myeloid cell populations and create a solid ground for successful cancer settlement. Once in the liver, metastatic cells begin a neovascularization process that is driven mainly by VEGF and FGF. Due to high mortality rates associated with liver cancer, as well as the limited effective treatment options for advanced disease, new therapies are urgently needed. Targeting a single molecule in a number of interactions between the tumor and the TME is highly unlikely to reduce tumor growth. Future trials should focus on combination therapies (i.e. targeted therapies combined with immunotherapy) to treat liver malignancies efficiently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Dimitrios Moris
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sahu SS, Dey S, Nabinger SC, Jiang G, Bates A, Tanaka H, Liu Y, Kota J. The Role and Therapeutic Potential of miRNAs in Colorectal Liver Metastasis. Sci Rep 2019; 9:15803. [PMID: 31676795 PMCID: PMC6825151 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-52225-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Liver metastasis is the major cause of CRC patient mortality, occurring in 60% patients with no effective therapies. Although studies have indicated the role of miRNAs in CRC, an in-depth miRNA expression analysis is essential to identify clinically relevant miRNAs and understand their potential in targeting liver metastasis. Here we analyzed miRNA expressions in 405 patient tumors from publicly available colorectal cancer genome sequencing project database. Our analyses showed miR-132, miR-378f, miR-605 and miR-1976 to be the most significantly downregulated miRNAs in primary and CRC liver metastatic tissues, and CRC cell lines. Observations in CRC cell lines indicated that ectopic expressions of miR-378f, -605 and -1976 suppress CRC cell proliferation, anchorage independent growth, metastatic potential, and enhance apoptosis. Consistently, CRC patients with higher miR-378f and miR-1976 levels exhibited better survival. Together, our data suggests an anti-tumorigenic role of these miRNAs in CRC and warrant future in vivo evaluation of the molecules for developing biomarkers or novel therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smiti S Sahu
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Shatovisha Dey
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Sarah C Nabinger
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Guanglong Jiang
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.,Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Alison Bates
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Hiromi Tanaka
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Yunlong Liu
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Janaiah Kota
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. .,The Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|