Comparing interventions for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: A network meta-analysis

Therapeutic interventions for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: a comprehensive assessment of systematic reviews

BACKGROUND

A variety of different treatments have been proposed to effectively treat chronic central serous chorioretinopathy but there remains uncertainty regarding the efficacy of a number of treatment options. We aim to evaluate the efficacy of several therapeutic options for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy including photodynamic therapy, conventional laser photocoagulation, subthreshold micropulse laser, selective retina therapy, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antagonists, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists.

METHODS

Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating treatment modalities for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Primary outcome measures included improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF). Conclusions regarding the efficacy of each modality were summarized and compared to findings of several key randomized controlled trials.

RESULTS

Ten systematic reviews and meta-analyses that incorporated 58 unique randomized controlled trials and observational studies were identified. Treatments that were shown to improve BCVA and promote SRF resolution included half-fluence and half-dose photodynamic therapy, conventional laser therapy, and subthreshold micropulse laser therapy. Evidence regarding selective retina therapy was limited and inconclusive. VEGF antagonists were not effective in the absence of choroidal neovascularization and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists were not effective.

CONCLUSION

The most effective therapeutic option for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy is half-dose or half-fluence photodynamic therapy, however, conventional laser therapy is an acceptable alternative in cases when photodynamic therapy is unavailable and when fluid leakage sites are not subfoveal or juxtafoveal. Subthreshold micropulse laser is less effective but can be considered when other options are unavailable.

Resolution of subretinal fluid in intractable central serous chorioretinopathy with high-dose intravitreal aflibercept

Purpose

To report an unusual case of a patient with intractable central serous chorioretinopathy with a dramatic treatment response to high-dose intravitreal aflibercept.

Methods

Retrospective case report.

Results

A 40-year-old female patient presented with decreased vision after use of intranasal fluticasone and recent life stressors and was diagnosed with central serous chorioretinopathy. Over a three-year period, she underwent numerous therapies, including seven sessions of photodynamic therapy, intravitreal bevacizumab, standard-dose intravitreal aflibercept, intravitreal faricimab, oral eplerenone, oral acetazolamide, and topical ketorolac, with minimal to no treatment response. After a single treatment with high-dose intravitreal aflibercept, 8 mg, she achieved resolution of subretinal fluid.

Conclusion

High-dose intravitreal aflibercept may have a role in management of treatment-resistant central serous chorioretinopathy; further studies are needed.

Intravitreal Brolucizumab for Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy without Choroidal Neovascular Membrane - a Pilot Study

PURPOSE

To study intravitreal brolucizumab in the management of persistent macular fluid in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) without choroidal neovascular membrane (CNVM).

METHODS

Retrospective case series which included eyes with chronic CSCR with persistent macular fluid for ≥ 3 months without CNVM. Intravitreal brolucizumab was administered in all eyes. Primary outcome measure was the resolution of intraretinal (IRF) and/or subretinal fluid (SRF) on OCT.

RESULTS

Five eyes (four patients) with chronic CSCR were included. All eyes showed complete resolution of SRF 1 month following injection. Minimal residual IRF was present in two eyes. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was stable in three eyes, and two eyes showed improvement. Central macular thickness (CMT) and subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) showed reduction.

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal brolucizumab is effective in the rapid reduction of persistent macular fluid in chronic CSCR without CNVM. Long-term follow-up data are required to study recurrence and adverse effect profile.

Outcomes of Micropulse Laser Trabeculoplasty Compared to Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

To perform a meta-analysis and systematic review to compare the efficacy and complications of micropulse laser trabeculoplasty (MLT) and selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in adult patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT).

Methods

We performed a systematic review utilizing PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, on April 8, 2024. Meta-analyses were performed for the mean change in intraocular pressure (IOP) at one-month, six-month, and one-year follow-up visits, rate of IOP spikes (>5 mmHg increase from the pre-procedure baseline IOP), rate of treatment failure (<20% or <3 mmHg reduction in IOP or requiring additional medications or procedures), and mean change in number of medications.

Results

Six studies, with a total of 593 eyes, were included: 283 underwent MLT, while 310 underwent SLT. A statistically significant difference in the efficacy of MLT versus SLT at one-month and six-month follow-ups was present, with SLT reducing IOP by 0.83 mmHg (95% CI: 0.20, 1.47; P = 0.01) more and 0.55 mmHg (95% CI: 0.02, 1.08; P = 0.04) more than MLT, respectively. At the one-year follow-up, there was no significant disparity in IOP reduction between SLT and MLT (WMD = 0.16; 95% CI: -0.40, 0.71; P = 0.58). There was a significantly lower rate of IOP spikes in the MLT treatment group (RR = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.16, 0.89; P = 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of treatment failures (RR = 1.05; 95% CI: 0.68, 1.62; P = 0.84) or number of topical medications reduced (WMD = 0.06; 95% CI: -0.13, 0.26; P = 0.53).

Conclusion

While SLT may offer greater short-term reductions in IOP, it may be associated with more postoperative IOP spikes when compared to MLT. At one-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in IOP reduction or failure rates between the MLT and SLT groups.

Subthreshold Micropulse Laser Versus Oral Spironolactone in Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose

To compare the efficacy and safety of subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) and spironolactone therapy for treating chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).

Methods

This was a quasi-randomized controlled trial. Eligible patients were quasi-randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive SML or oral spironolactone and were assessed at 3 months after treatment.

Results

A total of 84 patients (90 eyes) were randomly assigned to receive SML (n = 45) or spironolactone (n = 39) initially. At last follow-up, 59.5% of patients in the SML group had complete resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF) compared to 43.6% in spironolactone group (P = 0.362). The mean visual acuity did not significantly improve between the two groups (0.38 ± 0.44 vs. 0.43 ± 0.43 logMAR). The central retinal thickness was decreased from 335.06 ± 120.25 µm to 222.15 ± 94.90 µm in the SML group and from 308.02 ± 90.69 µm to 257.27 ± 102.28 µm in the spironolactone group. After treatment, subfoveal choroidal thickness, total choroidal area, and stromal and luminal choroidal area were significantly lower in the spironolactone group as compared to the SML group. During the entire visit, the recurrence rate of SRF was 9.1% in the SML group compared to 35.3% in the spironolactone group. Slight adverse events occurred more frequently in the spironolactone group (0% vs. 16%).

Conclusions

Both SML and oral spironolactone were effective and safe treatments to ameliorate retinal anatomical structures for chronic CSC. A lower recurrence rate and fewer adverse effects were observed in the SML group, and better choroidal structure recovery was seen in the spironolactone group.

Translational Relevance

The investigation of SML and oral spironolactone may inform evidence-based clinical decisions for chronic CSC patients.

180- Versus 360-Degree Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in Open Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PRCIS

This systematic review and meta-analysis found that 360-degree selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) is significantly more effective than 180-degree SLT at reducing intraocular pressure at 1-month and 1-year follow-ups without increased serious adverse event risk.

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy of 180- versus 360-degree selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in adults with open angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT).

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases, from 1995 to December 30, 2023, for studies comparing 180 and 360-degree SLT in adults with OAG and OHT (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024497832). Meta-analyses were performed to calculate nominal percent and raw reductions in intraocular pressure (IOP) between treatment groups at 1-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-ups, as well as success rates, defined as a 20% or greater IOP reduction.

RESULTS

Nine studies with 1044 eyes were included; 491 received 180-degree SLT, and 553 received 360-degree SLT. At the 1-month follow-up, 360-degree SLT reduced IOP by 3.45% more (WMD=3.45; 95% CI: 2.02-4.88; P <0.00001) and 0.87 mm Hg more (WMD=0.87; 95% CI: 0.35-1.38; P =0.0010). At the 1-year follow-up, 360-degree SLT reduced IOP by 4.33% more (WMD=4.33; 95% CI: 2.35-6.32; P <0.0001) and 1.15 mm Hg more (WMD=1.15; 95% CI: 0.25-2.04; P =0.01). At 2 years of follow-up, 360-degree SLT reduced IOP by 4.86% more (WMD=4.86; 95% CI: -0.32, 10.0; P =0.07) and 1.25 mm Hg more (WMD=1.25; 95% CI: -0.29, 2.79; P =0.11); however, the difference was not statistically significant. Compared with 360-degree SLT, 180-degree SLT had a significantly lower success rate (OR=0.50; 95% CI: 0.35-0.72; P =0.0002). There was no difference in serious complications between interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

360-degree SLT is more effective than 180-degree SLT at lowering IOP at 1-month and 1-year follow-ups as well as achieving successful IOP control without increased risk of serious complications.

Efficacy and safety of faricimab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of faricimab compared with other anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents in treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A systematic review (SR) was conducted up to January 2023. Network meta-analyses (NMA) were performed, including sensitivity and subgroup analyses for naïve population. Outcomes included changes in visual acuity (Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters), anatomical changes, frequency of injections and adverse events. The Cochrane Collaboration guidelines and the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis framework were used for the SR and the certainty of evidence, respectively.

RESULTS

From 4128 identified records through electronic databases and complementary searches, 63 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) met the eligibility criteria, with 42 included in the NMA. Faricimab showed a significant reduction in the number of annual injections compared with most fixed and flexible anti-VEGF treatment regimens, while showing no statistically significant differences in visual acuity through ETDRS letter gain, demonstrating a comparable efficacy. Retinal thickness results showed comparable efficacy to other anti-VEGF agents, and inferior only to brolucizumab. Results also showed that more patients treated with faricimab were free from post-treatment retinal fluid compared with aflibercept every 8 weeks, and both ranibizumab and bevacizumab, in the fixed and pro re nata (PRN) assessed schedules. Faricimab showed a comparable safety profile regarding the risk of ocular adverse events and serious ocular adverse events (SOAE), except for the comparison with brolucizumab quarterly, in which faricimab showed a significant reduction for SOAE risk.

CONCLUSION

Faricimab showed a comparable clinical benefit in efficacy and safety outcomes, with a reduction in annual injections compared with fixed and flexible anti-VEGF drug regimens, representing a valuable treatment option for nAMD patients.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023394226.

Comparative efficacy of brolucizumab, half-dose photodynamic therapy, and aflibercept in managing chronic central serous chorioretinopathy

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of brolucizumab, half-dose PDT, and aflibercept in treating chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study with chronic CSC patients who underwent intravitreal injection of one shot of brolucizumab or aflibercept in the first 3 months, followed by pro re nata regimens or a single session of half-dose PDT, was retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of eyes that achieved complete absorption of retinal fluid without requiring any rescue treatment. Secondary outcomes included changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and central choroidal thickness (CCT).

RESULTS

A total of 54 consecutive patients were included in this study with 18 patients in each group. At months 1 and 2, the brolucizumab group exhibited the highest rate of complete retinal fluid resolution (61% and 77%), followed by the half-dose PDT group (56% and 72%), and lowest in the aflibercept group (28% and 33%), with statistically significant differences noted at month 2 (P = 0.012). The brolucizumab group also demonstrated the most significant reduction in CCT at months 1 and 2 among the three groups (P = 0.007 and 0.001). Recurrence of retinal fluid in the brolucizumab groups was predominantly observed at month 3. Conversely, the half-dose PDT group exhibited the most favorable anatomical results starting from month 3. Notably, mild vitritis was observed in one case from the brolucizumab group.

CONCLUSIONS

Single injection of brolucizumab demonstrates trends of faster regression of persistent residual retinal fluid, greater CCT and CRT decline, and matched BCVA compared to half-dose PDT in the short term.

The role of inflammation in central serous chorioretinopathy: From mechanisms to therapeutic prospects

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is a leading cause of permanent vision loss, ranking fourth among macular diseases, trailing only age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, and retinal vein obstruction. While mounting evidence implicates inflammation as a pivotal factor in the onset and advancement of CSC, the specific pathophysiological process and molecular mechanisms underlying inflammation remain incompletely understood. A complex network of cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules interplay to trigger inflammatory and pathological cascades, highlighting the need for a comprehensive comprehension of the inflammation-related mechanisms behind CSC progression. In this piece, we examine the existing comprehension of CSC's pathology and pathogenesis. Additionally, we present an overview of the mechanisms underlying the onset and progression of CSC inflammation, followed by a thorough analysis and discussion of the potential of targeted inflammatory intervention for both preventing and treating CSC.

Hyperplasia of the retinal pigment epithelium secondary to subthreshold laser treatment in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy

PURPOSE

To assess the development of hyperplasia of the retinal pigment epithelium (HRPE) secondary to subthreshold laser treatment (STL) in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR).

METHODS

Prospective study including 149 eyes of 146 patients with CSCR with persistent subretinal fluid (SRF) that have undergone STL using the Navilas® device. Visual acuity (VA) optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) were performed before and after the treatment. The HRPE was identified on OCT as a hyperreflective and dense material at the expense of the RPE that did not exist prior to the treatment. The demographics of the patients as well as the parameters of the STL treatments employed were registered.

RESULTS

Seven HRPE cases after STL were identified, observing an incidence of 4.7% (7 out of 149 eyes). The mean age was 52.1 ± 3.6 years, being 6/7 males. The mean number of STL sessions was 1.3 ± 0.5. The mean total fluence applied was 52.2 ± 12.4 J/cm2 (range 35.37 to 76.39 J/cm2), using a duty cycle of 10% in all cases. The HRPE was subfoveal in 6 of the 7 cases. The SRF was resolved in 6 of the 7 patients. The mean VA loss was -14.1 ± 14.3 ETDRS letters.

CONCLUSION

The development of HRPE secondary to STL in CSCR is an uncommon but severe adverse effect, probably related to the excessive energy employed. Further studies are warranted to minimize the incidence and to know the predictors of this complication after STL treatment to optimize the parameters that should be used.

Early versus delayed photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy

PURPOSE

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) patients are sometimes referred to Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) with very long-term disease. The purpose of this study was to analyze the results of PDT in CSCR eyes with long-standing disease.

METHODS

The medical records of the patients that underwent PDT for CSCR between 2009 and 2019 were reviewed. Cases were divided into two groups based on the duration of disease before PDT treatment: early treatment (3 to 6 months) and delayed treatment (longer than 6 months). The treatment was defined as successful when the subfoveal fluid was absorbed during follow-up.

RESULTS

The PDT treatment was successful in 76% and 77% of eyes in the early and delayed treatment groups, respectively. Both groups showed significant improvement in central retina measurements at the 3-months follow-up which persisted to the last follow-up visit. The visual acuity (VA) at baseline was significantly worse in the delayed treatment group (0.5 ± 0.26 vs. 0.3 ± 0.24, P = 0.042) and improved in both groups but remained low in the delayed treatment group during the study.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that if CSCR is not spontaneously improving over 3 months the patient should be offered PDT, to prevent VA loss from the long-term presence of subretinal fluid in the macula. PDT is not associated with loss of vision in eyes with chronic CSCR, and can be safely used in eyes with relatively good VA.