The Prevalence and Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction in Male Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Is it safe to implant a penile prosthesis in a solid organ transplant recipient? A systematic review

Solid organ transplant recipients exhibit an elevated incidence of erectile dysfunction, attributed to comorbidities and specific factors associated with organ failure. While treatment mirrors the general population's, response rates are lower, and there is a heightened concern about implanting a penile prosthesis in immunocompromised patients due to the potential occurrence of severe complications. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of penile prostheses in this population. Among fourteen included studies, ten were case reports or series of cases, and four were non randomized case-control studies with non-transplanted patients as controls. Complications affected 34 patients (11.15%), with mechanical device failures in 18 cases (5.9%) and infections in 13 cases (4.26%). Most infections required hospitalization, antibiotic treatment, and prosthesis removal, with two cases of life-threatening Fournier's gangrene. Case-control studies revealed no differences in overall reoperation rates between transplant recipients and controls. However, pelvic organ transplant recipients undergoing three-piece prosthesis implantation showed higher complications rates related to reservoir issues. Despite limited evidence, case-control studies demonstrated a generally low/moderate risk of bias within each specific domain, although overall bias was moderate/severe. As a result, clinicians may mitigate concerns regarding penile prosthesis implantation in solid organ transplant recipients.

A propensity score-matched analysis of intra- and postoperative penile prosthetic complications in the solid organ transplant population

INTRODUCTION

Solid organ transplant (SOT) has an anticipated higher risk of penile prosthesis (PP) complications related to immunosuppression and surgical approach post-SOT. It is still not determined if PP surgery in the SOT population incurs these same higher risks.

OBJECTIVES

To observe differences in intra- and postoperative PP complications between SOT and non-SOT cases from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, a large real-world database of deidentified patient data from 56 health care organizations within the United States.

METHODS

We used the TriNetX database to perform a propensity score-matched cohort study comparing 10-year outcomes between patients with and without a SOT (kidney, heart, lung, liver, pancreas, and intestine) who underwent a PP procedure. Cohorts were matched on age, race/ethnicity, history of pelvic and abdominal surgery, overweight and obesity status, type 2 diabetes mellitus, atherosclerosis, substance use disorders, socioeconomic difficulties, anticoagulant/antiplatelet medications, and spinal cord injury. Outcomes included intra- and perioperative complications as well as prosthetic complications (mechanical malfunction, fibrosis, displacement, hemorrhage, pain, stenosis, removal with or without replacement, and complex [all postoperative complications]).

RESULTS

There were 233 patients in each group after matching (SOT and non-SOT). The mean ± SD age at the prosthesis procedure was 59.7 ± 9.89 years, and 44% of patients were White (P > .05). There was no significant difference for incidence of intra- and perioperative complications (2.62% vs 2.19%, P = .76). The SOT group did not have a higher 10-year incidence of complex complications (30.58% vs 27.51%, P = .11) or mechanical malfunction (10.35% vs 11.62%, P = .25) when compared with the non-SOT group. No difference was found for other prosthetic-related complications (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

In our analysis, patients with a SOT were not more likely to experience long-term complications related to PP. Surgeons performing PP surgery in the SOT population may consider this procedure a potentially safe and viable option for restoring erectile function.

The impact of renal transplantation on sexual function in males with end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on dialysis have a special profile, including constant uremic status and frequent comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension and coronary artery disease, as well as complications related to dialysis. All listed factors can influence or be the cause of sexual dysfunction in both men and women. There is a high incidence (70%) and prevalence (82%) of erectile dysfunction in men with CKD.

PURPOSE

In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the impact of renal transplantation in patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease and erectile dysfunction, using the same study population before and after transplantation.

DATA SOURCES

we searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library (Inception to August 2022) and clinicaltrials.gov (Inception to August 2022) without language restrictions.

STUDY SELECTION

eligible studies evaluated the same patients with end-stage kidney disease before and after renal transplantation using IEEF questionnaire.

DATA EXTRACTION

reviewers working independently and in duplicate extracted data and assessed the risk of bias.

DATA SYNTHESIS

the final analysis included 28 cohort studies, comprising 2252 participants.

RESULTS

Our results showed improvement in erectile function after renal transplantation. Our study shows a 13% improvement in erectile dysfunction after renal transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this meta-analysis would suggest improvement in erectile dysfunction after renal transplantation.

"Postulating Penis: What Influences the Interest of Transmasculine Patients in Gender Affirming Penile Reconstruction Techniques?"

BACKGROUND

The limitations of metoidioplasty and phalloplasty have been reported as deterrents for transgender and other gender expansive individuals (T/GE) desiring gender affirming surgery, and thus penile transplantation, epithesis, and composite tissue engineering (CTE) are being explored as alternative interventions.

AIM

We aim to understand the acceptability of novel techniques and factors that may influence patient preferences in surgery to best treat this diverse population.

METHODS

Descriptions of metoidioplasty, phalloplasty, epithesis, CTE, and penile transplant were delivered via online survey from January 2020 to May 2020. Respondents provided ordinal ranking of interest in each intervention from 1 to 5, with 1 representing greatest personal interest. Demographics found to be significant on univariable analysis underwent multivariable ordinal logistic regression to determine independent predictors of interest.

OUTCOMES

Sexual orientation, gender, and age were independent predictors of interest in interventions.

RESULTS

There were 965 qualifying respondents. Gay respondents were less likely to be interested in epithesis (OR: 2.282; P = .001) compared to other sexual orientations. Straight individuals were the least likely to be interested in metoidioplasty (OR 3.251; P = .001), and most interested in penile transplantation (OR 0.382; P = .005) and phalloplasty (OR 0.288, P < .001) as potential interventions. Gay and queer respondents showed a significant interest in phalloplasty (Gay: OR 0.472; P = .004; Queer: OR 0.594; P = .017). Those who identify as men were more interested in phalloplasty (OR 0.552; P < .001) than those with differing gender identities. Older age was the only variable associated with a decreased interest in phalloplasty (OR 1.033; P = .001). No demographic analyzed was an independent predictor of interest in CTE.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

A thorough understanding of patient gender identity, sexual orientation, and sexual behavior should be obtained during consultation for gender affirming penile reconstruction, as these factors influence patient preferences for surgical interventions.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

This study used an anonymous online survey that was distributed through community channels and allowed for the collection of a high quantity of responses throughout the T/GE population that would otherwise be impossible through single-center or in-person means. The community-based methodology minimized barriers to honesty, such as courtesy bias. The survey was only available in English and respondents skewed young and White.

CONCLUSION

Despite previously reported concerns about the limitations of metoidioplasty, participants ranked it highly, along with CTE, in terms of personal interest, with sexual orientation, gender, and age independently influencing patient preferences, emphasizing their relevance in patient-surgeon consultations. A. Parker, G. Blasdel, C. Kloer et al. "Postulating Penis: What Influences the Interest of Transmasculine Patients in Gender Affirming Penile Reconstruction Techniques?". J Sex Med 2022;19:385-393.

Impact of Kidney Transplantation on Male Sexual Function: Results from a Ten-Year Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The effects of kidney transplantation on male sexual function are controversial.

AIM

To evaluate the impact of kidney transplantation on erectile and ejaculatory function and to assess a possible correlation between some selected characteristics of patients and their erectile and ejaculatory function after renal transplantation.

METHODS

An observational retrospective analysis was conducted on male patients who had undergone kidney transplantation from January 2009 to April 2019. A prospectively maintained database was used to collect all data. Patients were evaluated before kidney transplant and 6 and 12 months after kidney transplant. Male patients undergoing renal transplantation for any cause who were sexually active with a stable partner were included in the study.

OUTCOMES

The main outcome measures included the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) and the 4-item version of Male Sexual Health Quality-Ejaculation Disorders (MSHQ-EjD Short Form) questionnaires. The first 3 questions of the MSHQ-EjD Short Form were used to assess the ejaculatory function, whereas the fourth question was used to evaluate the ejaculation bother.

RESULTS

A total of 95 patients were eligible in the study. The evaluation of sexual function was available in 56 patients (58.9%). Mean IIEF-15 significantly decreased at 6 months (P < .001) remaining unchanged at 12 months (P = .228). Mean MSHQ-EjD Short Form (1-3) significantly decreased at 6-month follow-up (P < .001) and at 12-month follow-up (P = .024). Mean MSHQ-EjD Short Form (4) was significantly increased compared with the baseline at both 6 and 12 months (P < .05). IIEF-15 was significantly related to the MSHQ-EjD Short Form at 6-month and 12-month follow-up (P < .001). Age, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, pretransplantation testosterone, time for transplantation, baseline IIEF-15, and baseline MSHQ-EjD Short Form (1-3) were significantly associated (P < .05) with both IIEF-15 and the MSHQ-EjD Short Form (1-3) at 6-month and 12-month follow-up after kidney transplantation.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Improvement of knowledge regarding the effects of kidney transplantation on sexual function and about the patient characteristics related to sexual health after transplantation.

STRENGTH & LIMITATIONS

This is the first article that analyzes in depth the ejaculatory function in patients who had undergone kidney transplantation assessing ejaculation with a validated questionnaire. The main limitation is the retrospective design of the study.

CONCLUSION

Kidney transplantation appears to have a negative impact on sexual health, significantly worsening both erectile and ejaculatory functions. Age, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, pretransplantation testosterone levels, time for transplantation, as well as erectile and ejaculatory function before transplant were significantly related to erectile and ejaculatory functions after renal transplantation. Spirito L, Manfredi C, Carrano R, et al. Impact of Kidney Transplantation on Male Sexual Function: Results from a Ten-Year Retrospective Study. J Sex Med 2020;17:2191-2197.