Topovectorial mechanisms control the juxtamembrane proteolytic processing of Nrf1 to remove its N-terminal polypeptides during maturation of the CNC-bZIP factor

Nrf1 is not a direct target gene of SREBP1, albeit both are integrated into the rapamycin-responsive regulatory network in human hepatoma cells

The essential role of protein degradation by ubiquitin-proteasome system is exerted primarily for maintaining cellular protein homeostasis. The transcriptional activation of proteasomal genes by mTORC1 signaling depends on Nrf1, but whether this process is directly via SREBP1 remains elusive. In this study, our experiment evidence revealed that Nrf1 is not a direct target of SREBP1, although both are involved in the rapamycin-responsive regulatory networks. Closely scrutinizing two distinct transcriptomic datasets unraveled no significant changes in transcriptional expression of Nrf1 and almost all proteasomal subunits in either siSREBP2-silencing cells or SREBP1-∕-MEFs, when compared to equivalent controls. However, distinct upstream signaling to Nrf1 dislocation by p97 and its processing by DDI1/2, along with downstream proteasomal expression, may be monitored by mTOR signaling, to various certain extents, depending on distinct experimental settings in different types of cells. Our further evidence has been obtained from DDI1-∕-(DDI2insC) cells, demonstrating that putative effects of mTOR on the rapamycin-responsive signaling to Nrf1 and proteasomes may also be executed partially through a DDI1/2-independent mechanism, albeit the detailed regulatory events remain to be determined.

Activation of the membrane-bound Nrf1 transcription factor by USP19, a ubiquitin-specific protease C-terminally anchored in the endoplasmic reticulum

The membrane-bound transcription factor Nrf1 (encoded by Nfe2l1) is activated by sensing glucose deprivation, cholesterol abundance, proteasomal inhibition and oxidative stress and then mediates distinct signaling responses to maintain cellular homeostasis. Herein, we found that Nrf1 stability and transactivity are both enhanced by USP19, a ubiquitin-specific protease tail-anchored in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) through its C-terminal transmembrane domain. Further experiments revealed that USP19 directly interacts with Nrf1 in proximity to the ER and topologically acts as a deubiquitinating enzyme to remove ubiquitin moieties from this protein, which allow it to circumvent potential proteasomal degradation. This USP19-mediated effect takes place only after Nrf1 is retro-translocated by p97 out of the ER membrane to dislocate the cytoplasmic side. Conversely, knockout of USP19 causes significant decreases in the abundance of Nrf1 and the entrance of its active isoform into the nucleus, which result in the downregulation of its target proteasomal subunits and a modest reduction in USP19^-/--derived tumor growth in xenograft mice when compared with wild-type controls. Altogether, these results demonstrate that USP19 serves as a novel mechanistic modulator of Nrf1, but not Nrf2, thereby enabling Nrf1 to be rescued from the putative ubiquitin-directed ER-associated degradation pathway. In turn, our additional experimental evidence has revealed that transcriptional expression of endogenous USP19 and its promoter-driven reporter genes is differentially regulated by Nrf2, as well by Nrf1, at distinct layers within a complex hierarchical regulatory network.

Silibinin ameliorates cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury via activating Nfe2l1-mediated antioxidative response to suppress the ROS/MAPK signaling pathway

Cisplatin, a first-line chemotherapeutic agent commonly used to treat various solid tumors, induce severe adverse effects, especially nephrotoxicity, which largely limits its clinical application. However, the currently used measures to prevent nephrotoxicity are not ideal owing to the mechanisms underlying cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity are not comprehensively understood. Herein, we examined the effects of silibinin on cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity and found that silibinin exerted cytoprotection effects during cisplatin treatment in HEK293 cells and in a cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) model. Mechanistically, silibinin ameliorated cisplatin-induced AKI via decreasing ROS-mediated MAPK signaling pathway activation, which was confirmed using the inhibitor N-acetylcysteine. Moreover, the protective effect of silibinin against cisplatin-induced ROS generation through the antioxidant transcription factor nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 1 (Nfe2l1), rather than Nfe2l2, mediates HO1 expression. Furthermore, interference with the abundance of Nfe2l1 using siRNA or an overexpression plasmid enhanced or decreased the effect of cisplatin-induced apoptosis, respectively, in HEK293 cells. Interestingly, Nfe2l1 protein stability was more sensitive to cisplatin than that of Nfe2l2. More importantly, the mechanism that silibinin activates Nfe2l1-mediated antioxidant responses was confirmed in a cisplatin-induced AKI model. Silibinin rescued cisplatin-induced Nfe2l1 inhibition by regulating its transcription and post-translational modifications. Taken together, our results reveal a novel mechanism by which silibinin ameliorates cisplatin-induced AKI via activating Nfe2l1-mediated antioxidative response, which provides a new insights to protect patients receiving cisplatin-based cancer treatment against AKI.

Differential Yet Integral Contributions of Nrf1 and Nrf2 in the Human HepG2 Cells on Antioxidant Cytoprotective Response against Tert-Butylhydroquinone as a Pro-Oxidative Stressor

In the past 25 years, Nrf2 (nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2, also called NFE2L2) had been preferentially parsed as a master hub of regulating antioxidant, detoxification, and cytoprotective genes; albeit as a matter of fact that Nrf1 (nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 1, also called NFE2L1)-rather than Nrf2-is indispensable for cell homeostasis and organ integrity during normal growth and development. Herein, distinct genotypic cell lines (i.e., Nrf1α^-/-, Nrf2^-/-ΔTA, and caNrf2^ΔN) are employed to determine differential yet integral roles of Nrf1 and Nrf2 in mediating antioxidant responsive genes to tert-butylhydroquinone (tBHQ) serving as a pro-oxidative stressor. In Nrf1α^-/- cells, Nrf2 was highly accumulated but also could not fully compensate specific loss of Nrf1α's function in its basal cytoprotective response against endogenous oxidative stress, though it exerted partially inducible antioxidant response, as the hormetic effect of tBHQ, against apoptotic damages. By contrast, Nrf2^-/-ΔTA cells gave rise to a substantial reduction of Nrf1 in both basal and tBHQ-stimulated expression levels and hence resulted in obvious oxidative stress, but it can still be allowed to mediate a potent antioxidant response, as accompanied by a significantly decreased ratio of GSSG (oxidized glutathione) to GSH (reduced glutathione). Conversely, a remarkable increase of Nrf1 expression resulted from the constitutive active caNrf2^ΔN cells, which were not manifested with oxidative stress, whether or not it was intervened with tBHQ. Such inter-regulatory effects of Nrf1 and Nrf2 on the antioxidant and detoxification genes (encoding HO-1, NQO1, GCLC, GCLM, GSR, GPX1, TALDO, MT1E, and MT2), as well on the ROS (reactive oxygen species)-scavenging activities of SOD (superoxide dismutase) and CAT (catalase), were further investigated. The collective results unraveled that Nrf1 and Nrf2 make distinctive yet cooperative contributions to finely tuning basal constitutive and/or tBHQ-inducible expression levels of antioxidant cytoprotective genes in the inter-regulatory networks. Overall, Nrf1 acts as a brake control for Nrf2's functionality to be confined within a certain extent, whilst its transcription is regulated by Nrf2.

TCF11 Has a Potent Tumor-Repressing Effect Than Its Prototypic Nrf1α by Definition of Both Similar Yet Different Regulatory Profiles, With a Striking Disparity From Nrf2

Nrf1 and Nrf2, as two principal CNC-bZIP transcription factors, regulate similar but different targets involved in a variety of biological functions for maintaining cell homeostasis and organ integrity. Of note, the unique topobiological behavior of Nrf1 makes its functions more complicated than Nrf2, because it is allowed for alternatively transcribing and selectively splicing to yield multiple isoforms (e.g., TCF11, Nrf1α). In order to gain a better understanding of their similarities and differences in distinct regulatory profiles, all four distinct cell models for stably expressing TCF11, TCF11^ΔN , Nrf1α or Nrf2 have been herein established by an Flp-In™ T-REx™-293 system and then identified by transcriptomic sequencing. Further analysis revealed that Nrf1α and TCF11 have similar yet different regulatory profiles, although both contribute basically to positive regulation of their co-targets, which are disparate from those regulated by Nrf2. Such disparity in those gene regulations by Nrf1 and Nrf2 was further corroborated by scrutinizing comprehensive functional annotation of their specific and/or common target genes. Conversely, the mutant TCF11^ΔN, resulting from a deletion of the N-terminal amino acids 2-156 from TCF11, resembles Nrf2 with the largely consistent structure and function. Interestingly, our further experimental evidence demonstrates that TCF11 acts as a potent tumor-repressor relative to Nrf1α, albeit both isoforms possess a congruous capability to prevent malignant growth of tumor and upregulate those genes critical for improving the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Metformin leads to accumulation of reactive oxygen species by inhibiting the NFE2L1 expression in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells

Metformin, as the first-line drug for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, has been shown to possess a capability to activate or inhibit the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in different ways. However, the detailed mechanisms of the opposite effect are poorly understood. Here we provide evidence that metformin induces accumulation of ROS by inhibiting the expression of a core antioxidant transcription factor nuclear factor erythroid 2 like 1 (NFE2L1/Nrf1) in human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells. In the present study, we originally found that the increased ROS induced by metformin was blunted in NFE2L1 knockdown cell line. Furtherly by examining the effects of metformin on endogenous and exogenous NFE2L1, we also found metformin could not only inhibit the transcription of NFE2L1 gene, but also promote the degradation of NFE2L1 protein at the post-transcriptional level, whereas this effect can be reversed by high glucose. The inhibitory effect of metformin on NFE2L1 was investigated to occur through the N-terminal domain (NTD) of NFE2L1 protein, and its downregulation by metformin was in an AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-independent manner. But the activation of AMPK signaling pathway by metformin in NFE2L1 knockdown HepG2 cells is reversed, indicating that NFE2L1 may be an important regulator of AMPK signal. Altogether, this work provides a better understanding of the relationship between metformin and oxidative stress, and hence contributes to translational study of metformin through its hypoglycemic and tumor suppressive effects.

CL316243 treatment mitigates the inflammation in white adipose tissues of juvenile adipocyte-specific Nfe2l1 knockout mice

Nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 1 (NFE2L1) is a key transcription factor that regulates cellular adaptive responses to various stresses. Our previous studies revealed that adult adipocyte-specific Nfe2l1-knockout [Nfe2l1(f)-KO] mice show adipocyte hypertrophy and severe adipose inflammation, which can be worsened by rosiglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ agonist. To further assess the crucial roles of NFE2L1 in adipocytes, we investigated the effect of CL316243, a β3 adrenergic agonist that promotes lipolysis via a post-translational mechanism, on adipose inflammation in juvenile Nfe2l1(f)-KO mice. In contrast to adult mice, 4-week-old juvenile Nfe2l1(f)-KO mice displayed a normal fat distribution but reduced fasting plasma glycerol levels and elevated adipocyte hypertrophy and macrophage infiltration in inguinal and gonadal WAT. In addition, Nfe2l1(f)-KO mice had decreased expression of multiple lipolytic genes and reduced lipolytic activity in WAT. While 7 days of CL316243 treatment showed no significant effect on adipose inflammation in Nfe2l1-Floxed control mice, the same treatment dramatically alleviated macrophage infiltration and mRNA expression of inflammation and pyroptosis-related genes in WAT of Nfe2l1(f)-KO mice. Together with previous findings in adult mice, the current study highlights that NFE2L1 plays a fundamental regulatory role in lipolytic gene expression and thus might be an important target to improve adipose plasticity and lipid homeostasis.

Synergism and Antagonism of Two Distinct, but Confused, Nrf1 Factors in Integral Regulation of the Nuclear-to-Mitochondrial Respiratory and Antioxidant Transcription Networks

There is hitherto no literature available for explaining two distinct, but confused, Nrf1 transcription factors, because they shared the same abbreviations from nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 1 (also called Nfe2l1) and nuclear respiratory factor (originally designated α-Pal). Thus, we have here identified that Nfe2l1^Nrf1 and α-Pal^NRF1 exert synergistic and antagonistic roles in integrative regulation of the nuclear-to-mitochondrial respiratory and antioxidant transcription profiles. In mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), knockout of Nfe2l1^−/− leads to substantial decreases in expression levels of α-Pal^NRF1 and Nfe2l2, together with TFAM (mitochondrial transcription factor A) and other target genes. Similar inhibitory results were determined in Nfe2l2^−/− MEFs but with an exception that both GSTa1 and Aldh1a1 were distinguishably upregulated in Nfe2l1^−/− MEFs. Such synergistic contributions of Nfe2l1 and Nfe2l2 to the positive regulation of α-Pal^NRF1 and TFAM were validated in Keap1^−/− MEFs. However, human α-Pal^NRF1 expression was unaltered by hNfe2l1α^−/−, hNfe2l2^-/-ΔTA, or even hNfe2l1α^−/−+siNrf2, albeit TFAM was activated by Nfe2l1 but inhibited by Nfe2l2; such an antagonism occurred in HepG2 cells. Conversely, almost all of mouse Nfe2l1, Nfe2l2, and cotarget genes were downexpressed in α-Pal^NRF1+/- MEFs. On the contrary, upregulation of human Nfe2l1, Nfe2l2, and relevant reporter genes took place after silencing of α-Pal^NRF1, but their downregulation occurred upon ectopic expression of α-Pal^NRF1. Furtherly, Pitx2 (pituitary homeobox 2) was also identified as a direct upstream regulator of Nfe2l1 and TFAM, besides α-Pal^NRF1. Overall, these across-talks amongst Nfe2l1, Nfe2l2, and α-Pal^NRF1, along with Pitx2, are integrated from the endoplasmic reticulum towards the nuclear-to-mitochondrial communication for targeting TFAM, in order to finely tune the robust balance of distinct cellular oxidative respiratory and antioxidant gene transcription networks, albeit they differ between the mouse and the human. In addition, it is of crucial importance to note that, in view of such mutual interregulation of these transcription factors, much cautions should be severely taken for us to interpret those relevant experimental results obtained from knockout of Nfe2l1, Nfe2l2, α-Pal or Pitx2, or their gain-of-functional mutants.

Nrf1 Is Endowed with a Dominant Tumor-Repressing Effect onto the Wnt/β-Catenin-Dependent and Wnt/β-Catenin-Independent Signaling Networks in the Human Liver Cancer

Our previous work revealed that Nrf1α exerts a tumor-repressing effect because its genomic loss (to yield Nrf1α^-/- ) results in oncogenic activation of Nrf2 and target genes. Interestingly, β-catenin is concurrently activated by loss of Nrf1α in a way similar to β-catenin-driven liver tumor. However, a presumable relationship between Nrf1 and β-catenin is not yet established. Here, we demonstrate that Nrf1 enhanced ubiquitination of β-catenin for targeting proteasomal degradation. Conversely, knockdown of Nrf1 by its short hairpin RNA (shNrf1) caused accumulation of β-catenin so as to translocate the nucleus, allowing activation of a subset of Wnt/β-catenin signaling responsive genes, which leads to the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and related cellular processes. Such silencing of Nrf1 resulted in malgrowth of human hepatocellular carcinoma, along with malignant invasion and metastasis to the lung and liver in xenograft model mice. Further transcriptomic sequencing unraveled significant differences in the expression of both Wnt/β-catenin-dependent and Wnt/β-catenin-independent responsive genes implicated in the cell process, shape, and behavior of the shNrf1-expressing tumor. Notably, we identified that β-catenin is not a target gene of Nrf1, but this CNC-bZIP factor contributes to differential or opposing expression of other critical genes, such as CDH1, Wnt5A, Wnt11A, FZD10, LEF1, TCF4, SMAD4, MMP9, PTEN, PI3K, JUN, and p53, each of which depends on the positioning of distinct cis-regulatory sequences (e.g., ARE and/or AP-1 binding sites) in the gene promoter contexts. In addition, altered expression profiles of some Wnt/β-catenin signaling proteins were context dependent, as accompanied by decreased abundances of Nrf1 in the clinic human hepatomas with distinct differentiation. Together, these results corroborate the rationale that Nrf1 acts as a bona fide dominant tumor repressor, by its intrinsic inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin signaling and relevant independent networks in cancer development and malignant progression.

Unification of Opposites between Two Antioxidant Transcription Factors Nrf1 and Nrf2 in Mediating Distinct Cellular Responses to the Endoplasmic Reticulum Stressor Tunicamycin

The water-soluble Nrf2 (nuclear factor, erythroid 2-like 2, also called Nfe2l2) is accepted as a master regulator of antioxidant responses to cellular stress, and it was also identified as a direct target of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-anchored PERK (protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase). However, the membrane-bound Nrf1 (nuclear factor, erythroid 2-like 1, also called Nfe2l1) response to ER stress remains elusive. Herein, we report a unity of opposites between these two antioxidant transcription factors, Nrf1 and Nrf2, in coordinating distinct cellular responses to the ER stressor tunicamycin (TU). The TU-inducible transcription of Nrf1 and Nrf2, as well as GCLM (glutamate cysteine ligase modifier subunit) and HO-1 (heme oxygenase 1), was accompanied by activation of ER stress signaling networks. Notably, the unfolded protein response (UPR) mediated by ATF6 (activating transcription factor 6), IRE1 (inositol requiring enzyme 1) and PERK was significantly suppressed by Nrf1α-specific knockout, but hyper-expression of Nrf2 and its target genes GCLM and HO-1 has retained in Nrf1α^−/− cells. By contrast, Nrf2^−/−ΔTA cells with genomic deletion of its transactivation (TA) domain resulted in significant decreases of GCLM, HO-1 and Nrf1; this was accompanied by partial decreases of IRE1 and ATF6, rather than PERK, but with an increase of ATF4 (activating transcription factor 4). Interestingly, Nrf1 glycosylation and its trans-activity to mediate the transcriptional expression of the 26S proteasomal subunits, were repressed by TU. This inhibitory effect was enhanced by Nrf1α^−/− and Nrf2^−/−ΔTA, but not by a constitutive activator caNrf2^ΔN (that increased abundances of the non-glycosylated and processed Nrf1). Furthermore, caNrf2^ΔN also enhanced induction of PERK and IRE1 by TU, but reduced expression of ATF4 and HO-1. Thus, it is inferred that such distinct roles of Nrf1 and Nrf2 are unified to maintain cell homeostasis by a series of coordinated ER-to-nuclear signaling responses to TU. Nrf1α (i.e., a full-length form) acts in a cell-autonomous manner to determine the transcription of most of UPR-target genes, albeit Nrf2 is also partially involved in this process. Consistently, transactivation of ARE (antioxidant response element)-driven BIP (binding immunoglobulin protein)-, PERK- and XBP1 (X-box binding protein 1)-Luc reporter genes was mediated directly by Nrf1 and/or Nrf2. Interestingly, Nrf1α is more potent than Nrf2 at mediating the cytoprotective responses against the cytotoxicity of TU alone or plus tBHQ (tert-butylhydroquinone). This is also further supported by the evidence that the intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels are increased in Nrf1α^−/− cells, but rather are, to our surprise, decreased in Nrf2^−/−ΔTA cells.

Oncogenic Activation of Nrf2, Though as a Master Antioxidant Transcription Factor, Liberated by Specific Knockout of the Full-Length Nrf1α that Acts as a Dominant Tumor Repressor

Liver-specific knockout of Nrf1 in the mouse leads to spontaneous development of non- alcoholic steatohepatitis with dyslipidemia, and then its deterioration results in hepatoma, but the underlying mechanism remains elusive to date. A similar pathological model is reconstructed here by using human Nrf1α-specific knockout cell lines. Our evidence has demonstrated that a marked increase of the inflammation marker COX2 definitely occurs in Nrf1α^−/− cells. Loss of Nrf1α leads to hyperactivation of Nrf2, which results from substantial decreases in Keap1, PTEN and most of 26S proteasomal subunits in Nrf1α^−/− cells. Further investigation of xenograft model mice showed that malignant growth of Nrf1α^−/−-derived tumors is almost abolished by silencing of Nrf2, while Nrf1α^+/+-tumor is markedly repressed by an inactive mutant (i.e., Nrf2^−/−ΔTA), but largely unaffected by a priori constitutive activator (i.e., caNrf2^ΔN). Mechanistic studies, combined with transcriptomic sequencing, unraveled a panoramic view of opposing and unifying inter-regulatory cross-talks between Nrf1α and Nrf2 at different layers of the endogenous regulatory networks from multiple signaling towards differential expression profiling of target genes. Collectively, Nrf1α manifests a dominant tumor-suppressive effect by confining Nrf2 oncogenicity. Though as a tumor promoter, Nrf2 can also, in turn, directly activate the transcriptional expression of Nrf1 to form a negative feedback loop. In view of such mutual inter-regulation by between Nrf1α and Nrf2, it should thus be taken severe cautions to interpret the experimental results from loss of Nrf1α, Nrf2 or both.

Nrf1D Is the First Candidate Secretory Transcription Factor in the Blood Plasma, Its Precursor Existing as a Unique Redox-Sensitive Transmembrane CNC-bZIP Protein in Hemopoietic and Somatic Tissues

Among multiple distinct isoforms, Nrf1D is synthesized from a de novo translation of an alternatively-spliced transcript of Nrf1 mRNA, as accompanied by a naturally-occurring deletion of its stop codon-flanking 1466 nucleotides. This molecular event leads to the generation of a reading frameshift mutation, which results in a constitutive substitution of the intact Nrf1's C-terminal 72 amino acids (aa, covering the second half of the leucine zipper motif to C-terminal Neh3L domain) by an additional extended 80-aa stretch to generate a unique variant Nrf1D. The C-terminal extra 80-aa region of Nrf1D was herein identified to be folded into a redox-sensitive transmembrane domain, enabling it to be tightly integrated within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membranes. Notably, the salient feature of Nrf1D enables it to be distinguishable from prototypic Nrf1, such that Nrf1D is endowed with a lesser ability than wild-type Nrf1 to mediate target gene expression. Further evidence has also been presented revealing that both mRNA and protein levels of Nrf1D, together with other isoforms similar to those of Nrf1, were detected to varying extents in hemopoietic and somatic tissues. Surprisingly, we found the existence of Nrf1D-derived isoforms in blood plasma, implying that it is a candidate secretory transcription factor, albeit its precursor acts as an integral transmembrane-bound CNC-bZIP protein that entails dynamic topologies across membranes, before being unleashed from the ER to enter the blood.