Esophageal conduit necrosis

A practical approach to the post esophagectomy CT: expected postoperative anatomy and anatomical approach to associated complication

This pictorial review aims to provide a structured approach to the interpretation of post esophagectomy CT by reviewing the major esophagectomy surgeries and conduit reconstructions, along with their associated complications at key anatomical landmarks. This paper combines an image rich experience and evidence-based approach to common and rare complications. The paper begins with an overview of the conventional Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and the expected postoperative imaging appearance (with separate detailed tables on additional surgical reconstructions), followed by a focused review of various complications at specific anatomical sites in a systematic fashion. By the conclusion of this review, radiologists will be equipped to employ a systematic approach to post-esophagectomy CT interpretation, confidently identifying both common and uncommon complications.

Successful Salvage of Partial Gastric Conduit Necrosis by Primary Anastomosis in a Post-Esophagectomy Patient

Gastric conduit necrosis is a rare but severe complication of esophageal surgery, often associated with mediastinal sepsis and high morbidity and mortality rates, as well as reduced efficacy of conservative treatments. In most cases, management involves salvage therapy, including fluid resuscitation, antibiotics, aggressive debridement, drainage of infected collections, and proximal esophageal diversion. Primary anastomosis is rarely performed. We describe a successful case wherein we salvaged a patient following a McKeown esophagectomy and gastric pull-up, who developed partial full-thickness necrosis of the gastric conduit postoperatively, along with pleural and mediastinal sepsis. We managed this situation through thoracic debridement, take-down of the anastomosis, resection of the devitalized segment of the conduit, and primary esophagogastric anastomosis. Conduit perfusion was demonstrated using ICG fluorescent angiography. This case illustrates that, once debridement and sepsis control are achieved, a primary anastomosis, if feasible, can be safely performed, potentially avoiding a two-step procedure and a second laparotomy/thoracotomy.

Predictors of anastomotic leak and conduit necrosis after oesophagectomy: Results from the oesophago-gastric anastomosis audit (OGAA)

BACKGROUND

Both anastomotic leak (AL) and conduit necrosis (CN) after oesophagectomy are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Therefore, the identification of preoperative, modifiable risk factors is desirable. The aim of this study was to generate a risk scoring model for AL and CN after oesophagectomy.

METHODS

Patients undergoing curative resection for oesophageal cancer were identified from the international Oesophagogastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA) from April 2018-December 2018. Definitions for AL and CN were those set out by the Oesophageal Complications Consensus Group. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for both AL and CN. A risk score was then produced for both AL and CN using the derivation set, then internally validated using the validation set.

RESULTS

This study included 2247 oesophagectomies across 137 hospitals in 41 countries. The AL rate was 14.2% and CN rate was 2.7%. Preoperative factors that were independent predictors of AL were cardiovascular comorbidity and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The risk scoring model showed insufficient predictive ability in internal validation (area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve [AUROC] = 0.618). Preoperative factors that were independent predictors of CN were: body mass index, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, previous myocardial infarction and smoking history. These were converted into a risk-scoring model and internally validated using the validation set with an AUROC of 0.775.

CONCLUSION

Despite a large dataset, AL proves difficult to predict using preoperative factors. The risk-scoring model for CN provides an internally validated tool to estimate a patient's risk preoperatively.

Minimally invasive laparo-thoracoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy with semi-mechanical triangular anastomosis: Short-term outcomes of 114 consecutive patients

INTRODUCTION

Several surgical teams have developed so-called minimally invasive esophagectomy techniques with the intention of decreasing post-operative complications. The goal of this report is to determine the feasibility, reproducibility, morbidity and mortality of esophagectomy and intrathoracic anastomosis via thoracoscopy.

METHODS

This retrospective series included 114 consecutive non-selected patients who underwent Lewis Santy type esophagectomy between 2016 and 2020. The procedure was performed via abdominal laparoscopy, thoracoscopy with the patient in a supine position, without selective intubation, with intra-thoracic semi-mechanical triangular esophagogastric anastomosis.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 62.8years. Conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy was required in three patients (2.6%); no patient required conversion from thoracoscopy to thoracotomy. A semi-mechanical triangular esophagogastric anastomosis was successfully performed in all patients. Median duration of hospital stay was 16 (8-116) days. Mortality was 2.6%; 34 patients (29.8%) had major complications, 55 (48%) had a respiratory complication. The leakage rate was 12.3%; most were type I. Only 5.2% required an additional procedure. There was no mortality.

CONCLUSION

The analysis of this consecutive series found that this operative technique was reproducible and reliable. These results need to be confirmed by other studies. Pulmonary morbidity was high and remains the main challenge in this type of surgery.

First experience with a supercharged pedicled jejunal interposition for esophageal replacement after caustic ingestion in a middle-income Latin American country

Caustic or corrosive substance ingestion that results in severe esophageal and gastric lacerations frequently requires surgical management. The most common sequelae after an upper gastrointestinal tract caustic injury include non-responding luminal strictures, which are subject to esophageal replacement. Late corrective surgery may include esophagectomy with gastric pull-up and jejunal or colonic interpositions. Although long-segment esophageal reconstruction with jejunum is technically feasible and has demonstrated good outcomes, the complexity of the surgery has precluded the widespread use of this procedure in low- and middle-income countries. This document summarizes the most relevant aspects of caustic ingestion surgical management and describes the first Latin American experience in the reconstruction of an esophageal-gastric caustic injury using a pedicled jejunal interposition, as a viable and functional option in mid- and lower-income countries with well-established Thoracic Surgery departments and microsurgery access.

Re-thoracoscopy for the management of gastric conduit dehiscence after minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Gastric conduit dehiscence after esophagectomy represents a severe complication associated with high mortality. Surgical management is achieved through thoracotomy, but often ends up in conduit sacrifice and diversion.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 59-years-old man underwent minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma. After a worsening of the postoperative course and evidence at the CT scan and endoscopy of highly suspect gastric conduit failure, the patient underwent an exploratory thoracoscopy, which revealed a partial dehiscence of the gastric conduit treated with resection of the dehiscent gastric wall by a linear stapler on the guide of a 36-french orogastric tube. Patient had a regular postoperative course without any complications and was discharged on the 6th postoperative day.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

The management of conduit necrosis is extremely challenging. There are several interventional options and it is difficult to decide the most appropriate treatment for each individual patient. In our case we decided to perform a reintervention with a thoracoscopic approach, resecting the dehiscent area of the gastric conduit.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive surgery is a valid option for the management of post-operative complications, including those in emergency setting. Re-suturing a partial dehiscence of gastric conduit may be feasible if tissue conditions allow.

A Rat Model of Esophagogastric Anastomotic Stricture

Esophagogastric anastomosis stricture is one of the most common postoperative complications after esophagectomy; yet, its pathogenesis is still not fully understood, and the treatment and prevention of anastomotic stricture are limited due to the lack of a proper animal model. The insufficient blood supply in the gastric tube is considered a risk factor for postoperative anastomotic strictures. In this study, we used thermal imaging to develop a stable rodent model with esophagogastric anastomotic stricture caused by ischemia. Briefly, 30 male Sprague-Dawley rats have been divided into the control group and the ischemia group. The esophagogastric ischemia anastomosis was performed with the help of intraoperative thermal imaging to identify the poor perfusion area. An unpaired t test with Welch's correction was used to analyze the difference between the two groups. On postoperative day 84, in the control group, no anastomosis stricture was observed, while in the ischemia group, 12 out of 15 animals (80%) developed obvious anastomosis stricture which could not let a 2.7-mm endoscope pass through. The diameter of the anastomosis in the control group and the ischemia group were 2.80 ± 0.15 mm and 1.73 ± 0.44 mm (p < 0.01), respectively (evaluated by endoscopy examination and barium radiography). H&amp;E stain and Masson's trichrome showed that the anastomosis in the ischemia group had more connective tissue hyperplasia and collagen deposition than control group. Thus, this new rat model can be used as a platform to further investigate the potential interventions for prevention of esophagogastric anastomotic stricture.

Baseball bat-like gastric tube for end-to-side oesophageal-gastric anastomosis decreased risks of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: A retrospective propensity score matched comparative study with 613 patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between baseball bat-like gastric tubes for end-to-side oesophageal-gastric anastomosis and occurrence of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.

METHODS

From July 2019 to June 2021, 613 patients with bat-like or narrow gastric tubes for end-to-side oesophageal-gastric anastomosis in oesophagectomy were retrospectively enrolled, in which 120 patients had narrow gastric tubes and 493 had bat-like gastric tubes. Clinical data including baseline characteristics, in-hospital variables and follow-up outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

Higher occurrence of anastomotic leak was observed in the narrow group in the unmatched cohort (14.2%, 17/120 vs. 7.3%, 36/493; P = 0.016) or the matched cohort after Propensity Score Matching (PSM) analysis (14.2%, 17/120 vs. 7.5%, 27/360, P = 0.028) when compared to the bat-like group; Multivariable analysis for risk factors of postoperative anastomotic leak in the unmatched cohort showed that the use of bat-like gastric tube was an independent protective factor (OR: 0.502, 95% CI: 0.270-0.935, P = 0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

Bat-like gastric tube can be used for end-to-side oesophageal-gastric anastomosis in oesophagectomy. This technique by improving blood supply to the area distal to the anastomosis decreased the incidence of anastomotic leak.

Outcomes of Gastric Conduit in Corrosive Esophageal Stricture: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Gastric conduit has emerged as the preferred treatment option for both esophageal bypass and replacement for corrosive stricture of the esophagus. There is a lack of consensus and a dearth of published literature regarding the short- and long-term complications of using a gastric conduit. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the outcomes, morbidity, and complications associated with it.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar (January 1960 to May 2020) were systematically searched for all studies reporting short- and/or long-term outcomes and complications following the use of a gastric conduit for corrosive esophageal stricture.

RESULTS

Seven observational studies involving 489 patients (53.2% males, mean age ranging from 22.1 to 41 years) who had ingested a corrosive substance (acid in 74.8%, alkali in 20.7%, and unknown in the rest) were analyzed. Gastric pull-up was performed in 56.03% (274/489) of patients. Median blood loss in the procedure was 187.5 ml with a mean operative duration of 298.75 ± 55.73 min. The overall pooled prevalence rate of anastomotic leak was 14.4% [95% CI (6.2-24.0); p < 0.05, I² = 67.38], and anastomotic stricture was 27.2% [95% CI (13-42.8); p < 0.001, I² = 80.11]. Recurrent dysphagia according to pooled prevalence estimates occurred in 14.4% patients [95% CI (5.4-25.1); p < 0.05, I² = 69.1] and 90-day mortality in 4.8% patients [95% CI (1.5-9.1%); I² = 31.1, p = 0.202]. The dreaded complication of conduit necrosis had a pooled prevalence of 1.3% [95% CI (0.1-3.4%); I² = 0, p = 0.734].

CONCLUSION

The stomach can be safely used as the conduit of choice in corrosive strictures with an acceptable rate of complications, postoperative morbidity, and mortality.

Imaging of postoperative complications following Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy

Postoperative imaging plays a key role in the identification of complications after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (ILE). Careful analysis of imaging examinations can help identify the cause of the presenting symptoms and the mechanism of the complication. The complex surgical procedure used in ILE results in anatomical changes that make imaging interpretation challenging for many radiologists. The purpose of this review was to make radiologists more familiar with the imaging findings of normal anatomical changes and those of complications following ILE to enable accurate evaluation of patients with an altered postoperative course. Anastomotic leak, gastric conduit necrosis and pleuropulmonary complications are the most serious complications after ILE. Computed tomography used in conjunction with oral administration of contrast material is the preferred diagnostic tool, although it conveys limited sensitivity for the diagnosis of anastomotic fistula. In combination with early endoscopic assessment, it can also help early recognition of complications and appropriate therapeutic management.

Salvage Esophagectomy

Salvage esophagectomy is an option for patients with recurrent or persistent esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiation therapy or those who undergo active surveillance after induction chemoradiation therapy. Salvage resection is associated with higher rates of morbidity compared with planned esophagectomy but offers patients with locally advanced disease a chance at improved long-term survival. Salvage resection should be preferentially performed in a multidisciplinary setting by high-volume and experienced surgeons. Technical considerations, such as prior radiation dosage, radiation field, and choice of conduit, should be taken into account.

Hybrid esophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: long-term results. A single-centre experience

Introduction

The authors report long-term outcomes in patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and consequently underwent hybrid oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer (OC).

Aim

To evaluate long-term outcomes in patients suffering from OC, who underwent hybrid oesophagectomy.

Material and methods

Our cohort consisted of patients suffering from OC, who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Hybrid esophagectomy was performed 8–10 weeks after oncological treatment.

Results

Ninety-four patients underwent surgery for OC from 2011 to 2015. Histology revealed adenocarcinoma in 60.6%, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in 36.2%, and other type of cancer in 3.2%. Seventy-three (77.7%) patients with advanced stage (T3-4, N0-2, M0) were indicated to receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Trans-hiatal hybrid oesophagectomy was performed in 83 (88.3%) patients. Transthoracic hybrid oesophagectomy was performed in 11 (11.7%) patients. Histology of the resected specimens of 18 (24.7%) patients did not reveal OC, i.e. pathological complete response (pCR). In our cohort, we proved an association between occurrence of pCR and age as well as disease-free survival (DFS). The patients who presented with pCR were significantly younger – below 60 years of age (p = 0.017). They also showed significantly higher mean DFS (p = 0.004).

Conclusions

Combined oesophagectomy with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy results in a better long-term outcome in patients suffering from oesophageal cancer. In our set of patients who underwent hybrid esophagectomy, satisfactory short-term and especially long-term results of surgical treatment for oesophageal cancer were observed.

Treatment protocol for secondary esophageal reconstruction using 'supercharged' colon interposition flaps

Locoregional esophageal cancer is currently treated with induction chemoradiotherapy, followed by esophagectomy with reconstruction, using a gastric conduit. In cases of conduit failure, patients are temporized with a cervical esophagostomy and enteral nutrition until gastrointestinal continuity can be established. At our institution, we favor reconstruction, using a colon interposition with a 'supercharged' accessory vascular pedicle. Consequently, we sought to examine our technique and outcomes for esophageal reconstruction, using this approach. We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent esophagectomy at our center between 2008 and 2018. We identified those patients who had a failed gastric conduit and underwent secondary reconstruction. Patient demographics, perioperative details, and clinical outcomes were analyzed after our clinical care pathway was used to manage and prepare patients for a second major reconstructive surgery. Three hundred and eighty eight patients underwent esophagectomy and reconstruction with a gastric conduit. Seven patients (1.8%) suffered gastric conduit loss and underwent a secondary reconstruction using a colon interposition with a 'supercharged' vascular pedicle. Mean age was 70.1 (±7.3) years, and six patients were male. The transverse colon was used in four cases (57.1%), left colon in two cases (28.6%), and right colon in one case (14.3%). There were no deaths or loss of the colon interposition at follow-up. Three patients (42.9%) developed an anastomotic leak, which resolved with conservative management. All patients had resumption of oral intake within 30 days. Utilizing a 'supercharging' technique for colon interposition may improve the perfusion to the organ and may decrease morbidity. Secondary reconstruction should occur when the patient's oncologic, physiologic, and psychosocial condition is optimized. Our outcomes and preoperative strategies may provide guidance for those centers treating this complicated patient population.

Quantitative fluorescence-guided perfusion assessment of the gastric conduit to predict anastomotic complications after esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Fluorescence angiography (FA) assesses anastomotic perfusion during esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction, but its interpretation is subjective. This study evaluated time to fluorescent enhancement in the gastric conduit, with the aim to determine a threshold to predict postoperative anastomotic complications.

METHODS

In a prospective cohort study, all consecutive patients undergoing esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction from July 2018 to October 2019 were included. FA was performed before anastomotic reconstruction following injection of indocyanine green (ICG). During FA, the following time points were recorded: ICG injection, first fluorescent enhancement in the lung, at the base of the gastric conduit, at the planned anastomotic site, and at ICG watershed or in the tip of the gastric conduit. Anastomotic complications including anastomotic leakage and clinically relevant strictures were documented.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients were included, the majority (67 out of 84, 80%) of which underwent an Ivor Lewis procedure. After a median follow-up of 297 days, anastomotic leakage was observed in 12 out of 84 (14.3%) and anastomotic stricture in 12 out of 82 (14.6%). Time between ICG injection and enhancement in the tip was predictive for anastomotic leakage (P = 0.174, area under the curve = 0.731), and a cut-off value of 98 seconds was derived (specificity: 98%). All times to enhancement at the planned anastomotic site and ICG watershed were significantly predictive for the occurrence of a stricture, however area under the curves were <0.7.

CONCLUSIONS

The identified fluorescent threshold can be used for intraoperative decision making or to identify potentially high-risk patients for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction.

Thoracoscopic total esophagogastrectomy with supercharged colon interposition for the treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma in situs inversus

Background: Esophagectomy in situs inversus is challenging. With long-segment supercharged reconstruction, it becomes more perplexing and multidisciplinary surgical skills are needed. Challenges met and the surgical technique used is presented in this case report. Methods: The case of a 49-year old patient with situs inversus abdominus and a locally advanced distal esophageal adenocarcinoma extending to the stomach is presented. Results: Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and due to inability to use the stomach as a conduit, a thoracoscopic total esophagogastrectomy with long-segment reconstruction was performed. The conduit used was the left colon and was supercharged with venous and arterial anastomoses in the neck. Conduit perfusion, as assessed by the Spy system revealed marked improvement post supercharging. No anastomotic leak was noted and oral diet was started on day 4. On day 26 the patient developed pneumonia necessitating intubation that was declined. Organ support was withheld with patient death at day 29. Conclusion: In long-segment esophageal reconstruction with supercharged colon, although thoracoscopy is feasible, laparoscopy is found unsafe. Careful preoperative planning and colon assessment via computed tomography(CT) colonography/angiography and a multidisciplinary team approach is recommended. Adjuncts to assess conduit perfusion like the Spy system are helpful. Supercharging the long colonic conduit is a way of minimizing ischemia-related complications.

Innovative and Contemporary Interventional Therapies for Esophageal Diseases

Esophageal surgery has become quite specialized, and both dedicated diagnostic and refined surgical techniques are required to deliver state-of-the-art care. The field has evolved to include endoscopic mucosal resection and radiofrequency ablation for early-stage esophageal cancer and minimally invasive esophagectomy with the reconstruction of a gastric conduit for carefully selected patients with esophageal cancer or those with "end-stage" esophagus from benign diseases. Reoperative esophageal surgery after esophagectomy deserves special mention given that these patients, with improved survival, are presenting years after esophagectomy with functional and anatomic disorders that sometimes require surgical intervention. Different diagnostic modalities are essential for assessing patients and planning surgical treatment. Recognizing early and late postoperative complications on imaging may expedite and improve patient outcomes. Finally, endoscopic management of achalasia with peroral endoscopic myotomy and the use of the LINX device for gastroesophageal reflux disease are highly effective and minimally invasive treatments that may reduce complications, costs, and length of hospital stay.

Microsurgical options after the failure of left colon interposition graft in esophagogastric reconstruction

Colon interposition is commonly used for esophageal reconstruction in patients with a previous gastrectomy. However, when colon interposition fails and alternative reconstruction is required, there are few options for reconstructing the long segment from the esophagus to the stomach. Here, we report on cases of esophagogastric reconstruction with limited alternative options after the failure of transverse and left colon interposition. In these cases, reconstruction was performed using two different microvascular methods: double-pedicle jejunal free flap and supercharged ileocolic interposition graft.

The Difficult Esophageal Conduit

A variety of esophageal diseases are treated with esophagectomy, from benign to esophageal cancer. Careful attention must be given to management of the difficult conduit, including patients who have had prior gastric surgery and other procedures, patients with conditions such as diabetic gastroparesis, which can affect the stomach as a future usable conduit, and patients who have an absent or unusable stomach. In these situations, consideration should be raised for the use of alternative conduits, including jejunal and colonic interposition conduits. The esophageal surgeon should also be adept at management of intraoperative difficulties with the conduit.

Conduit necrosis following esophagectomy: An up-to-date literature review

Esophageal conduit ischaemia and necrosis is an uncommon but devastating complication of esophagectomy and remains one of the most challenging issues in surgical practice. The incidence, time interval to develop symptoms, and clinical presentation are highly variable with no predictable pattern. Evidence comes from case reports and case series rather than randomized controlled trials. We describe the issues surrounding conduit necrosis affecting the stomach, jejunum and colon as an esophageal replacement and the advantages, disadvantages and challenges of each type of reconstruction. Diagnosis is challenging for the most experienced surgeon. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and computed tomography thorax with both oral and intravenous contrast is the gold standard. Management, either conservative or interventional is also a difficult decision. Management options include conservative treatment and more aggressive treatments such as stent insertion, surgical debridement and repair of the esophagus using jejunum, colon or a musculocutaneous flap. In spite of recent advances in surgical techniques, there is no reliable strategy to manage esophageal conduit necrosis. Our review covers the pathophysiology and clinical significance of esophageal necrosis while highlighting current techniques of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of this life-threatening condition.

Fluorescent image-based evaluation of gastric conduit perfusion in a preclinical ischemia model

Background

This study evaluated near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent images to assess gastric conduit perfusion after an esophagectomy in a porcine model of gastric conduit ischemia. The time necessary to acquire a sufficient fluorescent signal to confirm ischemia in the gastric conduit after peripheral or central venous injection of indocyanine green (ICG) was also investigated.

Methods

A reversible gastric conduit ischemic pig model was established through ligation and release of the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA, n=10). The esophageal reconstruction was performed to create an esophagogastric anastomosis. After ligation of the RGEA, ICG was injected into an ear vein (n=6) or the inferior vena cava (n=4). Under fluorescent imaging system guidance, the fluorescent signal-to-background ratio (SBR) in the gastric conduit or esophagus was measured during the entire procedure. We estimated the time necessary to acquire fluorescent signals in the gastric conduit using two different injection routes.

Results

When the RGEA was ligated, the SBR in the esophagus was significantly higher than that in the gastric conduit (P=0.02), and the SBR in the gastric conduit recovered within 180 s after release of the ligation. The time to acquire a fluorescent signal was faster with a central route than with a peripheral route (P=0.04).

Conclusions

We successfully created an ischemic animal model of the gastric conduit. Using this animal model, we evaluated the sensitivity and applicability of the fluorescent imaging system for observation and identification of ischemic areas during an esophagectomy.

Respiratory complications following mini-invasive laparoscopic and thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Experience in 215 patients

Introduction

Respiratory complications (RC) including respiratory failure and adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) affect the outcomes of esophagectomy substantially. In order to decrease their incidence, identification of important features of RC is necessary.

Aim

To evaluate the incidence and risk factors of postoperative RC following hybrid esophagectomy.

Material and methods

The retrospective analysis of consecutive hybrid esophagectomies for malignancies (transhiatal laparoscopic or thoracoscopic resection and limited open reconstruction phase) assessed the incidence and outcomes of RC in relation to the patients’ age, ASA score, neoadjuvant therapy, type of surgical procedure, TNM stage, the incidence of anastomotic leak and Clavien-Dindo classification.

Results

Transhiatal laparoscopic (176, 81.9%) or thoracoscopic hybrid esophagectomy (39, 18.1%, conversion in 7 patients) was completed in 215 patients, 187 (87%) men and 28 (13%) women. Respiratory complications developed in 86 (40%) and severe respiratory failure or ARDS occurred in 29 (13.5%) patients. The overall in-hospital mortality was 7.4%, 30-day mortality 5.6% (RC 9, myocardial infarction 1, conduit necrosis 1), and 90-day mortality a further 1.8% (multiple organ failure, ARDS). The incidence of RC correlates significantly with ASA score II and III (p = 0.0002) and Clavien-Dindo grade 4 and 5 in severe RC (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, hospital stay (p < 0.0001) and mortality (p < 0.0001) were significantly increased in RC.

Conclusions

The results show a higher occurrence of RC in polymorbid patients and patients with severe complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Adequate risk management including surgical technique and perioperative prophylaxis and therapy of RC should be studied and standardized.

Modified exposure method for gastric mobilization in robot-assisted esophagectomy

Background

We describe a modified method to facilitate gastric mobilization in robotic esophagectomy. Furthermore, we performed a prospective comparative analysis of surgical outcomes between the conventional method and described technique.

Methods

From April 1st, 2016 to December 31st, 2016, 59 consecutive patients were included who underwent robot-assisted McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in our institution. They were subdivided into two groups based on the method of gastric exposure: a grasper retraction (GR) group (n=27) and a thread retraction (TR) group (n=32). For the GR patients, robotic instruments were directly used to expose the surgical field for gastric mobilization. However, for TR patients, the right gastroepiploic arcade and the short gastric vessels were fully exposed via a polyester tape combined with a thread loop.

Results

There was no incidence of postoperative 30-day mortality. The median gastric mobilization time was 53 min (range, 38-77 min). It took significantly less time in the TR group compared to the GR group (P=0.005). The median amount of blood loss was 8 mL (range, 5-14 mL), and no significant difference was found between the two groups (P=0.573). The median number of dissected lymph nodes was 10 (range, 7-16), and there was no significant difference between groups (P=0.386). Similarly, the postoperative morbidity rates did not statistically differ between the two groups (P=0.942).

Conclusions

The robot-assisted McKeown procedure presented is a safe and easy to perform technique for stomach retraction during gastric mobilization. Compared with the conventional GR method of gastric mobilization, TR requires less operating time and allows for an excellent operative field. The technique could, therefore, help surgeons to overcome some of the defects of robotic esophagectomy during gastric mobilization.

Preoperative imaging and prediction of oesophageal conduit necrosis after oesophagectomy for cancer

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal conduit necrosis following oesophagectomy is a rare but life-threatening complication. The present study aimed to assess the impact of coeliac axis stenosis on outcomes after oesophagectomy for cancer.

METHODS

The study included consecutive patients who had an Ivor Lewis procedure with curative intent for middle- and lower-third oesophageal cancer at two tertiary referral centres. All patients underwent preoperative multidetector CT with arterial phase to detect coeliac axis stenosis. The coeliac artery was classified as normal, with extrinsic stenosis due to a median arcuate ligament or with intrinsic stenosis caused by atherosclerosis.

RESULTS

Some 481 patients underwent an Ivor Lewis procedure. Of these, ten (2·1 per cent) developed oesophageal conduit necrosis after surgery. Coeliac artery evaluation revealed a completely normal artery in 431 patients (91·5 per cent) in the group without conduit necrosis and in one (10 per cent) with necrosis (P < 0·001). Extrinsic stenosis of the coeliac artery due to a median arcuate ligament was found in two patients (0·4 per cent) without conduit necrosis and five (50 per cent) with necrosis (P < 0·001). Intrinsic stenosis of the coeliac artery was found in 11 (2·3 per cent) and eight (80 per cent) patients respectively (P < 0·001). Eight patients without (1·7 per cent) and five (50 per cent) with conduit necrosis had a single and thin left gastric artery (P < 0·001).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that oesophageal conduit necrosis after oesophagectomy for cancer may be due to pre-existing coeliac axis stenosis.

Laparoscopic retrosternal gastric pull-up for fistulized mediastinal mass

We describe the case of a patient successfully reconstructed with laparoscopic retrosternal gastric pull-up after esophagectomy for unresectable posterior mediastinal inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, eroding into the esophagus and compressing the airways. A partial esophagectomy with esophagostomy was performed for treatment of esophageal pleural fistula and empyema, while the airways were managed with the placement of an endobronchial stent. Gastrointestinal reconstruction was performed using a laparoscopic approach to create a retrosternal tunnel for gastric conduit pull-up and cervical anastomosis. The patient was discharged uneventfully after 6 d, and has done very well at home with normal diet.

Non-inferiority of minimally invasive oesophagectomy: an 8-year retrospective case series

BACKGROUND

The trend towards laparoscopic surgery seen in other specialties has not occurred at the same pace in oesophagectomy. This stems from concerns regarding compromised oncological clearance, and complications associated with gastric tube necrosis and anastomotic failure. We present our experience of minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIO) compared to open and hybrid surgery. We aim to ascertain non-inferiority of MIO by evaluating impact on survival, oncological clearance by resection margin and lymph node harvest and post-operative complications.

METHODS

Data were sourced retrospectively 2008-2015. Three approaches were studied. MIO (3-stage Mckeown), hybrid (2-stage Ivor Lewis, laparoscopy, thoracotomy) and open (2-stage Ivor Lewis).

RESULTS

Five-year survival was 54.2%. Surgical approach had no significant impact on survival at any stage of disease (Stage 0/I p = 0.98; stage II p = 0.2; stage III p = 0.76). There was no statistically significant difference in oncological clearance by resection margins between procedures when compared by disease stage (p = 0.49). A higher number of nodes were harvested in hybrid [median 27.5 (6-65)] and open surgeries [median 26 (4-54)] than in MIO [median 20 (7-44)] (p > 0.01). Numbers of nodes resected did not impact risk of recurrence [recurrence, median 25 (6-54), no recurrence, 26 (4-65)] (p = 0.25). Anastomotic strictures (22.4%) and potential leaks (17.9%) were more common in MIO (strictures p > 0.01, leaks p = 0.08), although associated morbidity was lower. Respiratory complications were less common in MIO (2.9%) versus hybrid (13.3%) (p = 0.02). Wound infection and chyle leak were also lower (wound 1.5% MIO 3.5% open, p = 0.6; chyle leak 1.5% MIO, 6.7% hybrid, p = 0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show no negative impact of MIO on survival or oncological clearance. Respiratory and wound complications are lower in MIO, but rates of anastomotic strictures and potential anastomotic leaks are increased. This may be due to the longer length of conduit and subclinical ischaemia at the anastomosis and merits further evaluation.

Roux-en-Y augmented gastric advancement: An alternative technique for concurrent esophageal and pyloric stenosis secondary to corrosive intake

Select group of patients with concurrent esophageal and gastric stricturing secondary to corrosive intake requires colonic or free jejunal transfer. These technically demanding reconstructions are associated with significant complications and have up to 18% ischemic conduit necrosis. Following corrosive intake, up to 30% of such patients have stricturing at the pyloro-duodenal canal area only and rest of the stomach is available for rather less complex and better perfused gastrointestinal reconstruction. Here we describe an alternative technique where we utilize stomach following distal gastric resection along with Roux-en-Y reconstruction instead of colonic or jejunal interposition. This neo-conduit is potentially superior in terms of perfusion, lower risk of gastro-esophageal anastomotic leakage and technical ease as opposed to colonic and jejunal counterparts. We have utilized the said technique in three patients with acceptable postoperative outcome. In addition this technique offers a feasible reconstruction plan in patients where colon is not available for reconstruction due to concomitant pathology. Utility of this technique may also merit consideration for gastroesophageal junction tumors.

Usefulness of the Clavien-Dindo Classification in Understanding the Limitations and Indications of Larynx-preserving Esophageal Reconstruction

Background:

The Clavien–Dindo (CD) classification is used to evaluate the severity of surgical complications. However, its usefulness in esophageal reconstruction has not been reported. To address this, this case series study used the CD classification to evaluate the complications after cervical esophageal reconstruction with free jejunum transfer or supercharged pedicled intestinal transfer.

Methods:

All consecutive patients who underwent esophageal cancer surgery with larynx-preserving free jejunum or pedicled ileocolic transfer in June 2012–December 2015 were identified. The postoperative complications were classified using the CD classification.

Results:

In total, 22 patients (20 men and 2 women; mean age, 63.3 years) underwent esophageal cancer reconstruction with larynx-preserving free jejunum transfer (n = 9) and supercharged pedicled intestinal transfer (n = 13). Seven patients underwent prophylactic tracheotomy. Four patients underwent emergent tracheotomy 1 or 5 days after surgery. The most frequent complication was recurrent nerve paralysis (RNP) (n = 8). Of these 8 RNP cases, 6 and 2 were classified as CD I and III complications, respectively. Pneumonia was the next most common complication (n = 7). Of these 7 pneumonia cases, 5 and 2 were classified as CD II and III, respectively. There were 2 cases of intestinal anastomosis leakage (CD II and III). On average, patients were able to start oral alimentation 15.1 (9–35) days after surgery.

Conclusions:

Our analysis with the CD classification suggested that vascularized free jejunum transfer or supercharge-drainage pedicled ileocolic transfer prevents postoperative intestinal anastomosis leakage and that prophylactic tracheotomy is especially indicated in cases with significant surgical damage in the cervical region.

Factors Affecting Blood Flow at the Tip of the Reconstructed Gastric Tube During Esophagectomy: A Study Using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography

The objective of this study was to clarify the factors affecting blood flow at the tip of the gastric tube during esophagectomy using indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography. The time until enhancement of the gastric tube tip determined using ICG fluorescence imaging is a useful indicator of blood flow, and has been shown not to differ significantly according to the connection status of the right or left gastroepiploic artery. Using ICG fluorescence imaging, the time until enhancement of the gastric tube tip was measured in 50 patients undergoing esophagectomy. Blood flow at the gastric tube tip was compared between 2 groups of patients: those in whom a connecting vessel from the left gastro-epiploic artery to the short gastric artery (l-s GA) was present and those in whom it was absent. The factors affecting blood flow to the gastric tube tip were also investigated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The median time taken for the gastric tube tip to show enhancement with ICG was significantly shorter in the group with an l-s GA connection (P = 0.02). Multivariate analysis showed that the absence of an l-s GA connection (P = 0.04) and presence of arteriosclerosis-related disease (P = 0.02) were significant independent factors that delayed blood flow to the gastric tube. It is essential to preserve the whole vessel arcade of the greater curvature to achieve good perfusion of the gastric tube with blood. The presence of arteriosclerosis-related disease is a major factor affecting the safety of anastomosis during gastric tube reconstruction.

Failure to rescue patients from early critical complications of oesophagogastric cancer surgery

'Failure to rescue' is a significant cause of mortality in gastrointestinal surgery. Differences in mortality between high and low-volume hospitals are not associated with large difference in complication rates but to the ability of the hospital to effectively rescue patients from the complications. We reviewed the critical complications following surgery for oesophageal and gastric cancer, their prevention and reasons for failure to rescue. Strategies focussing on perioperative optimization, the timely recognition and management of complications may be essential to improving outcome in low-volume hospitals.

[Delayed coloesophagoplasty in difficult clinical situations]

AIM

To improve immediate and long-term results of delayed coloesophagoplasty in cancer patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We presented three case reports of coloesophagoplasty in difficult clinical situations including technical impossibility of primary plasty, extraordinary anesthetic situation, transplant necrosis after primary plasty.

RESULTS

Gastrointestinal tract integrity was restored in all cases and patients returned to nutrition per os, that provided good quality of life and compensated nutritional deficiencies. Only one patient had bleeding in postoperative period that required relaparotomy. There were no postoperative complications in two other patients.

CONCLUSION

Delayed coloesophagoplasty should be performed in all patients who underwent esophagogastrectomy if progression of primary disease is absent. Graft placement and colic segment are chosen individually. However left half of colon with retrosternal location of transplant is preferable for plasty.

Secondary reconstruction with a transverse colon covered with a pectoralis major muscle flap and split thickness skin grafts for an esophageal defect and wide skin defects of the anterior chest wall

Necrosis of a reconstructed organ after esophagectomy is a rare postoperative complication. However, in case this complication develops, severe infectious complications can occur, and subsequent surgical reconstruction is quite complicated. To treat esophageal conduit necrosis after esophageal reconstruction with the terminal ileum and ascending colon, we reconstructed the esophagus using a transverse colon, which was covered with a pectoralis major muscle flap to reinforce the anastomotic site. In addition, split thickness skin grafts were applied to the wide skin defect to cover the reconstructed organs at the antesternal route. Widely extended split thickness skin grafts can adhere to the reconstructed organs without excessive tension. Therefore, this method enabled successful treatment of an esophageal defect and wide skin defects of the anterior chest wall.

Back-up procedures following complicated gastric pull-up procedure for esophageal reconstruction: Salvage with intestinal flaps

BACKGROUND

Gastric pull-up (GPU) is the most common procedure for restoring the continuity of the alimentary tract. Yet, complications because of anastomotic problems are reported to be as high as 25% after this procedure. Managing the neck with anastomotic leakage or stricture following failed GPU and/or radiotherapy is formidable. We report our method, basic algorithm and results with the complicated GPU procedure management with intestinal transfers .

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Nineteen cases referred to our department with complicated esophageal reconstruction following GPU procedure were included in this report. Of the19 patients, 18 had undergone GPU procedure for reconstruction after cancer resection (mean age 55 years) and one for idiopathic esophagitis (mean age 45years). Fifteen patients presented with severe stricture formation and 4 patients with leakage from the anastomotic site. Average time between the GPU and salvage procedures was 7.3 months for patients with stricture formation and 15.5 days for patients with leakage. Pedicled colon interposition (n = 8) was used when the upper end of the gastric tube was located below the sternoclavicular junction. A free jejunal flap (n = 11) was utilized when defects were located at the neck (above the sternoclavicular junction).

RESULTS

In all patients salvage procedures with intestinal flap transfer were successful with complete flap survival. Post-operative period was uneventful except of two patients with pedicled colon interposition who presented minor leakage post-operatively (10.5%). This was treated with conservative means, leading to spontaneous healing. The average follow-up for the patients with tumor resection was 11.8 months (range: 6 to 30) after the salvage procedure. All patients resumed smooth oral intake eventually. There were 16 patients who could feed with solid diet, whereas three patients were able to tolerate only soft diet.

CONCLUSION

Intestinal tissues can be safely and successfully transferred as salvage procedures, with meticulous technique, careful patient selection and individual flap design. While gastric pull-up remains a good procedure for esophageal reconstruction, the methods described in this report are useful as back-up armaments in complicated cases. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 36:567-572, 2016.

Postoperative complications do not affect long-term outcome in esophageal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

As esophagectomy is associated with a considerable complication rate, the aim of this study was to assess the impact of postoperative complications and neoadjuvant treatment on long-term outcome of adenocarcinoma (EAC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients.

METHODS

Altogether, 134 patients undergoing transthoracic esophagectomy between 2005 and 2010 with intrathoracic stapler anastomosis were included in the study. Postoperative complications were allocated into three main categories: overall complications, acute anastomotic insufficiency, and pulmonary complications. Data were collected prospectively and reviewed retrospectively for the purpose of this study.

RESULTS

SCC patients suffered significantly more often from overall and pulmonary complications (SCC vs. EAC: overall complications 67 vs. 45 %, p = 0.044; pulmonary complications 56 vs. 34 %, p = 0.049). The anastomotic insufficiency rates did not differ significantly (SCC 11%, EAC 15%, p = 0.69). Long-term survival of EAC and SCC patients was not affected by perioperative (overall/pulmonary) complications or by the occurrence of anastomotic insufficiency. Also, neoadjuvant treatment did not influence the incidence of complications or long-term survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first time the patient population of a center experienced with esophageal cancer surgery was assessed for the occurrence of general and esophageal cancer surgery-specific perioperative complications. Our results indicated that these complications did not affect long-term survival of EAC and SCC patients. Our data support the hypothesis that neoadjuvant treatment might not affect the incidence of perioperative complications or long-term survival after treatment of these tumor subtypes.

Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer - results of surgical therapy

Introduction

The indication for minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in esophageal cancer has an increasing tendency.

Aim

To present our cohort of patients operated on between 2006 and 2012.

Material and methods: A single centre study of 106 consecutive esophagectomies performed for esophageal cancer by a minimally invasive approach in 79 patients was performed. Transhiatal laparoscopic esophagectomy (THLE) was performed in 66 patients, transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) in 13 patients, with histological findings of squamous cell carcinoma in 28 and adenocarcinoma in 51 patients.

Results

The MIE was completed in 76 (96.2%) patients. In cases of TTE, the operation was converted to an open procedure in 3 cases. Operation time ranged from 225 to 370 min (average 256 min). The number of lymph nodes removed was 7–16 (11 on average). The postoperative course was without any complications in 54 (68.3%) patients. Respiratory complications were observed in 14 (17.7%) patients (9 following THLE, 5 following TTE). Other serious complications included acute myocardial infarction (1 patient) and necrosis of the gastroplasty (1 patient). Anastomotic dehiscence was observed in 8 patients, left recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis in 8 patients, intra-abdominal abscesses in 2 patients, and pleural empyema in 1 case. The overall morbidity of patients operated on by MIE was 31.6%. Thirty-day mortality was 10.1%.

Conclusions

The MIE belongs to the therapeutic portfolio of surgical procedures performed for esophageal cancer. Successful performance requires erudition of the surgical team in both minimally invasive procedures as well as in classical surgical treatment of esophageal cancer; therefore centralization of patients is imperative.

Successful management of oesophageal conduit necrosis by a single-stage reconstruction with the pedicled pectoralis major myocutaneous flap

Conduit necrosis is a rare but potentially devastating complication of oesophageal surgery and the subsequent reversal of oesophageal discontinuity can be challenging. An option for both cervical-oesophageal reconstruction and neck wound closure has been limited and less successful. We report a patient with colon conduit necrosis and cervical-oesophageal discontinuity whose cervial oesophagus was successfully reconstructed with a single-stage pedicled pectoralis major myocutaneous flap and neck wound closure.

When the Gastrointestinal Conduit for Total Esophageal Reconstruction Is Not an Option: Review of the Role of Skin Flaps and Report of Salvage With a Single-Stage Tubed Anterolateral Thigh Flap

This review adds to the limited body of literature describing the use of skin flaps for reconstruction of the esophagus and includes a report of a successful 1-stage, intrathoracic reconstruction of the cervical and thoracic esophagus after failed gastrointestinal conduit. Already widely used for reconstruction of the pharynx and cervical esophagus, the versatile anterolateral thigh flap can be considered an option for more extensive defects of the cervical and thoracic esophagus in this challenging patient population when gastric, jejunal, or colon conduits are not available. The authors believe the anterolateral thigh flap should be considered in 1-stage anatomic reconstruction of the cervical and thoracic esophagus in the absence of feasible gastrointestinal conduits.

Hemodynamics of the reconstructed gastric tube during esophagectomy: assessment of outcomes with indocyanine green fluorescence

BACKGROUND

Construction of a gastric tube that is well perfused with blood during esophagectomy is the most important factor in avoiding anastomotic leakage. We clarified the hemodynamics of the reconstructed gastric tube with indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence.

METHODS

In 20 patients undergoing gastric tube reconstruction during esophagectomy, we evaluated blood flow in the gastric tube with ICG fluorescence imaging. We divided the patients into two groups according to the quality of blood flow to the gastric tube-"good" (n = 9) and "sparse or absent" (n = 11)-based on visual assessment of the anastomosis of the right and left gastroepiploic vessels. We measured the time from initial enhancement of the root of the right gastroepiploic artery until enhancement of the most cranial branch of the left gastroepiploic artery and tip of the gastric tube.

RESULTS

The gastric tube was divisible into three zones according to the dominant arteries present in the greater curvature under ICG fluorescence. The left gastroepiploic artery was enhanced in a direction opposite that of physiological blood flow in all cases. The median period from initial enhancement of the root of the right gastroepiploic artery to the most cranial branch of the left gastroepiploic artery until perfusion up to the tip of the gastric tube did not differ significantly between the "good" and the "sparse or absent" groups (P = 0.24, 0.68) CONCLUSIONS: It is essential to preserve the whole vessel arcade of the greater curvature to achieve good blood perfusion in the gastric tube. The ICG fluorescence method has potential usefulness for evaluation of blood flow in the gastric tube.

Usefulness of indocyanine green angiography for evaluation of blood supply in a reconstructed gastric tube during esophagectomy

We report a case of necrosis of a reconstructed gastric tube in a 77-year-old male patient who had undergone esophagectomy. At the time of admission, the patient had active gastric ulcers, but these were resolved by treatment with a proton pump inhibitor. Subtotal esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction was performed. Visually, the reconstructed gastric tube appeared to be well perfused with blood. Using indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging the gastroepiploic vessels were well enhanced and no enhancement was visable 3 to 4 cm from the tip of the gastric tube. Four days after esophagectomy, gastric tube necrosis was confirmed, necessitating a second operation. The necrosis of the gastric tube matched the area that had been shown to lack blood perfusion by ICG angiography imaging. It seems that ICG angiography is useful for the evaluation of perfusion in a reconstructed gastric tube.