1
|
Borgheresi A, Agostini A, Pierpaoli L, Bruno A, Valeri T, Danti G, Bicci E, Gabelloni M, De Muzio F, Brunese MC, Bruno F, Palumbo P, Fusco R, Granata V, Gandolfo N, Miele V, Barile A, Giovagnoni A. Tips and Tricks in Thoracic Radiology for Beginners: A Findings-Based Approach. Tomography 2023; 9:1153-1186. [PMID: 37368547 DOI: 10.3390/tomography9030095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
This review has the purpose of illustrating schematically and comprehensively the key concepts for the beginner who approaches chest radiology for the first time. The approach to thoracic imaging may be challenging for the beginner due to the wide spectrum of diseases, their overlap, and the complexity of radiological findings. The first step consists of the proper assessment of the basic imaging findings. This review is divided into three main districts (mediastinum, pleura, focal and diffuse diseases of the lung parenchyma): the main findings will be discussed in a clinical scenario. Radiological tips and tricks, and relative clinical background, will be provided to orient the beginner toward the differential diagnoses of the main thoracic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Borgheresi
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Tronto 10/a, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital "Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche", Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Andrea Agostini
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Tronto 10/a, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital "Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche", Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Pierpaoli
- School of Radiology, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Tronto 10/a, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Alessandra Bruno
- School of Radiology, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Tronto 10/a, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Tommaso Valeri
- School of Radiology, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Tronto 10/a, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Ginevra Danti
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Eleonora Bicci
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Michela Gabelloni
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Federica De Muzio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences V. Tiberio, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Brunese
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences V. Tiberio, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Federico Bruno
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, Abruzzo Health, Unit 1, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Pierpaolo Palumbo
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, Abruzzo Health, Unit 1, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Gandolfo
- Diagnostic Imaging Department, Villa Scassi Hospital-ASL 3, 16149 Genoa, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Antonio Barile
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Tronto 10/a, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital "Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche", Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Santos FDS, Verma N, Watte G, Marchiori E, Mohammed TLH, Medeiros TM, Hochhegger B. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating between benign and malignant thoracic lymph nodes: a meta-analysis. Radiol Bras 2021; 54:225-231. [PMID: 34393288 PMCID: PMC8354191 DOI: 10.1590/0100-3984.2020.0084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To establish the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) in discriminating malignant from non-malignant thoracic lymph nodes. Materials and Methods This was a meta-analysis involving systematic searches of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases up through April 2020. Studies reporting thoracic DWI and lymph node evaluation were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. Results We evaluated six studies, involving a collective total of 356 mediastinal lymph nodes in 214 patients. Thoracic DWI had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 92% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 71-98%) and 93% (95% CI: 79-98%), respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 13.2 (95% CI: 4.0-43.8) and 0.09 (95% CI: 0.02-0.36), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio was 149 (95% CI: 18-1,243), and the AUC was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-0.98). Conclusion DWI is a reproducible technique and has demonstrated high accuracy for differentiating between malignant and benign states in thoracic lymph nodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco de Souza Santos
- Graduate Program in Internal Medicine and Health Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Nupur Verma
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida (UF), Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Guilherme Watte
- Graduate Program in Internal Medicine and Health Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Edson Marchiori
- Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | | | - Tássia Machado Medeiros
- Graduate Program in Internal Medicine and Health Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Bruno Hochhegger
- Graduate Program in Internal Medicine and Health Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sevick-Muraca EM, Kwon S, Rasmussen JC. Emerging lymphatic imaging technologies for mouse and man. J Clin Invest 2014; 124:905-14. [PMID: 24590275 DOI: 10.1172/jci71612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The lymphatic circulatory system has diverse functions in lipid absorption, fluid homeostasis, and immune surveillance and responds dynamically when presented with infection, inflammation, altered hemodynamics, and cancer. Visualization of these dynamic processes in human disease and animal models of disease is key to understanding the contributory role of the lymphatic circulatory system in disease and to devising effective therapeutic strategies. Longitudinal, non-destructive, and repeated imaging is necessary to expand our understanding of disease progression and regression in basic science and clinical investigations. Herein we summarize recent advances in in vivo lymphatic imaging employing magnetic resonance, computed tomography, lymphoscintigraphy, and emerging optical techniques with respect to their contributory roles in both basic science and clinical research investigations.
Collapse
|