Comparison of automated von Willebrand factor activity assays

Laboratory Testing for von Willebrand Factor Activity by a Glycoprotein Ib-Binding Assay (VWF:GPIbR): HemosIL von Willebrand Factor Ristocetin Cofactor Activity on ACL TOP®

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a lifelong and common inherited bleeding disorder caused by a quantitative deficiency and/or qualitative defect of von Willebrand factor (VWF). In order to establish the correct diagnosis of VWD, various tests must be conducted, including evaluation of factor VIII activity (FVIII:C), VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), and VWF functional activity. The platelet-dependent VWF activity is measured in different ways, with the historical ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo) using platelet aggregometry now replaced with newer assays that offer better precision, lower limits of detection, low coefficient of variation, and are fully automated. The VWF activity by glycoprotein Ib-binding assays (VWF:GPIbR) measured on the ACL TOP^® platform represents an automated assay that instead of using platelets employs latex beads coated with recombinant wild-type GPIb. VWF in the test sample agglutinates the polystyrene beads coated with GPIb in the presence of ristocetin. The reduction of turbidity as beads agglutinate represents a linear relationship with VWF:GPIbR activity. Using a ratio of VWF:GPIbR/VWF:Ag, the VWF:GPIbR assay also provides good sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing type 1 VWD from type 2. The following chapter describes a detailed protocol for the VWF:GPIbR assay.

Automated assays for von Willebrand factor activity

von Willebrand factor (VWF) ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) by platelet aggregometry has been considered the gold standard for evaluating the ability of VWF to bind platelets for over 40 years. Many automated systems no longer require platelets and rather rely on agglutination of latex particles. Automated methods of measuring VWF activity have improved performance characteristics and are performed on the same coagulation instruments used for routine testing via immunoturbidimetric methodology. Alternatively, a newer chemiluminescence assay system for measuring VWF activity demonstrates excellent performance characteristics. As these methods are becoming widely used, it is important to assess their performance in diagnosing and monitoring different types of von Willebrand disease. We review the automated methodologies and the published performance of these VWF assays. Advantages and limitations of these automated methods are discussed.

An international collaborative study to compare different von Willebrand factor glycoprotein Ib binding activity assays: the COMPASS-VWF study

Essentials New VWF activity assays are increasingly used but information on their comparability is limited. This is an ISTH SSC-organized study (expert labs, 5 countries) to compare all available assays. VWF activity by six assays correlated well with each other. The new assays show improved characteristics - minor differences are noted. SUMMARY: Background Several new assays have become available to measure von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity. The new assays appear to have improved performance characteristics compared with the old reference standard, ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo), but information is limited about how they compare with VWF:RCo and each other. Methods The von Willebrand factor Subcommittee of the International Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Scientific and Standardization Committee (SSC) designed a collaborative study involving expert laboratories from several countries to compare available tests with each other and with VWF:RCo. Eight laboratories from five countries were provided with blinded samples from normal healthy individuals and well-characterized clinical cases. Laboratories measured VWF activity using all tests available to them; data from six laboratories, not affected by thawing during transportation, are included in this study. Results All tests correlated well with VWF:RCo activity (r-values ranged from 0.963 to 0.989). Slightly steeper regression lines for VWF:Ab and VWF:GPIbM were clinically insignificant. The new assays showed improved performance characteristics. Of the commercially available assays, the VWF:GPIbR using the AcuStar system was the most sensitive and could reliably detect VWF activity below 1 IU dL-1 . The lower limit of the measuring interval for the VWF:GPIbM and the VWF:GPIbR assays was in the 3-4 and 3-6 IU dL-1 range, respectively. Inter-laboratory variation was also improved for most new assays. Conclusion All VWF activity assays correlated well with each other and the VWF:RCo assay. The slight differences in characteristics found in the COMPASS-VWF study will assist the VWF community in interpreting and comparing activity results.

Laboratory Testing for von Willebrand Factor Activity by Glycoprotein Ib Binding Assays (VWF:GPIb)

In addition to assessment of von Willebrand factor (VWF) antigen (VWF:Ag), the first-line laboratory investigation of possible von Willebrand disease (VWD) often includes an assay to measure GPIb (glycoprotein Ib) binding activity of VWF. A decreased GPIb binding activity is characteristic for most of the VWD types. For many years, the most frequently used assay for measuring GPIb binding activity was the ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo), which measures the agglutination of fixed human platelets by VWF in the presence of ristocetin. Because of performance issues, including high assay variability and a lack of VWF sensitivity, this assay is currently being replaced or supplemented by assays based on the binding of VWF to recombinant GPIb. One published method (now abbreviated VWF:GPIbR) uses wild-type GPIb for triggering the binding reaction in the presence of ristocetin. Another more widely used method (now abbreviated VWF:GPIbM) uses gain-of-function GPIb without ristocetin; this permits spontaneous binding of VWF to GPIb and avoids problems associated with the nonphysiological substance ristocetin. The binding of VWF to GPIb can be quantified by using different principles, e.g., ELISA, particle agglutination, or chemiluminescence. The following chapter describes a ristocetin-free method based on particle agglutination in more detail.

von Willebrand Factor and Prekallikrein in Plasma Are Associated With Thrombus Volume in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

OBJECTIVES

Disruption of the endothelial lining may be one of the events linking intraluminal thrombus and abdominal aortic aneurysm growth. In the present study, we examined whether von Willebrand factor activity in plasma, contact proteins of blood coagulation, and inflammatory biomarkers may be associated with intraluminal thrombus volume in search of a biochemical marker of endothelial damage and thrombus size.

DESIGN

Prospective study, correlating potential endothelial biomarkers and intraluminal thrombus volume acquired by computed tomography angiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasma was consecutively obtained from 38 patients with asymptomatic infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. von Willebrand factor activity, thrombin generation time, factor XII, and prekallikrein concentration were measured in plasma on automated and in-house platforms. In total, 8 patients were excluded due to ongoing anticoagulant therapy, renal impairment, or nonappearance, thus leaving 30 patients for further analysis. All patients had computed tomography angiography, and intraluminal volume was quantified off-line by OsiriX 6.5.

RESULTS

Median intraluminal thrombus volume was 42.7 mL. Spearman correlation analysis revealed a positive correlation between thrombus volume, von Willebrand factor activity (ρ = 0.56, P = .0013), and prekallikrein concentration in plasma (ρ = 0.54, P = .002).

CONCLUSION

von Willebrand factor activity and concentration of prekallikrein may both be of importance regarding the evolution of thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysm and possible biomarkers for aneurysm growth.