Effect of remote ischaemic conditioning on coagulation function as measured by whole blood impedance aggregometry and rotational thromboelastometry in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: A randomised controlled trial

Remote ischemic conditioning reduces postoperative bleeding in adult cardiac surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The current study was designed to systemically investigate the impact of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) on intra- and postoperative bleeding and transfusion in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing RIC with control on intra- and postoperative blood loss and blood transfusion. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery; 2) RCT; 3) perioperative administration of RIC compared to control; 4) outcomes of interest reported. Exclusion criteria included: 1) case reports, reviews, or abstracts; 2) animal or cell studies; 3) duplicate publications; 4) studies lacking information about outcomes of interest.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Databases search yielded 24 RCTs including 3530 patients, 1765 patients were allocated into RIC group and 1765 into control group. The current study suggested that RIC administration was associated with reduced postoperative blood loss (WMD=-57.89; 95% CI: -89.89 to -25.89; P=0.0004). RIC did not affect the volume of intraoperative blood loss (WMD=-4.02; 95% CI: -14.09 to 6.05; P=0.43), the volume of intra- and postoperative transfusion of red blood cell (RBC) (WMD=-15.66; 95% CI: -39.35 to 8.03; P=0.20), the re-exploration for bleeding (WMD=-0.01; 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.01; P=0.21).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study demonstrated that, RIC reduced post-operative blood loss in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgeries. It also indicated that, RIC reduced intra-operative RBC transfusion in adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. However, RIC did not influence intra-operative bleeding, post-operative blood transfusion.

Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on lung function after surgery under general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) protects organs from ischemia-reperfusion injury. Recent trials showed that RIPC improved gas exchange in patients undergoing lung or cardiac surgery. We performed a systematic search to identify randomized controlled trials involving RIPC in surgery under general anesthesia. The primary outcome was the PaO2/FIO2 (P/F) ratio at 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes were A-a DO2, the respiratory index, duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation (MV), incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and serum cytokine levels. The analyses included 71 trials comprising 7854 patients. Patients with RIPC showed higher P/F ratio than controls (mean difference [MD] 36.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 12.8 to 60.4, I2 = 69%). The cause of heterogeneity was not identified by the subgroup analysis. Similarly, A-a DO2 (MD 15.2, 95% CI - 29.7 to - 0.6, I2 = 87%) and respiratory index (MD - 0.17, 95% CI - 0.34 to - 0.01, I2 = 94%) were lower in the RIPC group. Additionally, the RIPC group was weaned from MV earlier (MD - 0.9 h, 95% CI - 1.4 to - 0.4, I2 = 78%). Furthermore, the incidence of ARDS was lower in the RIPC group (relative risk 0.73, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.89, I2 = 0%). Serum TNFα was lower in the RIPC group (SMD - 0.6, 95%CI - 1.0 to - 0.3 I2 = 87%). No significant difference was observed in interleukin-6, 8 and 10. Our meta-analysis suggested that RIPC improved oxygenation after surgery under general anesthesia.Clinical trial number: This study protocol was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (registration number: UMIN000030918), https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000035305.

Interaction of Cardiovascular Nonmodifiable Risk Factors, Comorbidities and Comedications With Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury and Cardioprotection by Pharmacological Treatments and Ischemic Conditioning

Preconditioning, postconditioning, and remote conditioning of the myocardium enhance the ability of the heart to withstand a prolonged ischemia/reperfusion insult and the potential to provide novel therapeutic paradigms for cardioprotection. While many signaling pathways leading to endogenous cardioprotection have been elucidated in experimental studies over the past 30 years, no cardioprotective drug is on the market yet for that indication. One likely major reason for this failure to translate cardioprotection into patient benefit is the lack of rigorous and systematic preclinical evaluation of promising cardioprotective therapies prior to their clinical evaluation, since ischemic heart disease in humans is a complex disorder caused by or associated with cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities. These risk factors and comorbidities induce fundamental alterations in cellular signaling cascades that affect the development of ischemia/reperfusion injury and responses to cardioprotective interventions. Moreover, some of the medications used to treat these comorbidities may impact on cardioprotection by again modifying cellular signaling pathways. The aim of this article is to review the recent evidence that cardiovascular risk factors as well as comorbidities and their medications may modify the response to cardioprotective interventions. We emphasize the critical need for taking into account the presence of cardiovascular risk factors as well as comorbidities and their concomitant medications when designing preclinical studies for the identification and validation of cardioprotective drug targets and clinical studies. This will hopefully maximize the success rate of developing rational approaches to effective cardioprotective therapies for the majority of patients with multiple comorbidities. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Ischemic heart disease is a major cause of mortality; however, there are still no cardioprotective drugs on the market. Most studies on cardioprotection have been undertaken in animal models of ischemia/reperfusion in the absence of comorbidities; however, ischemic heart disease develops with other systemic disorders (e.g., hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, atherosclerosis). Here we focus on the preclinical and clinical evidence showing how these comorbidities and their routine medications affect ischemia/reperfusion injury and interfere with cardioprotective strategies.

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Reduces Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Results from previous studies evaluating the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery are inconsistent. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims to determine whether RIPC improves cardiac and renal outcomes in adults undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched to identify RCTs comparing RIPC with control in cardiac surgery. The coprimary outcomes were the incidence of postoperative myocardial infarction (MI) and the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI). Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effect model. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to volatile only anesthesia versus propofol anesthesia with or without volatiles, high-risk patients versus non-high-risk patients, and Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) or Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria versus other criteria for AKI diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total of 79 RCTs with 10,814 patients were included. While the incidence of postoperative MI did not differ between the RIPC and control groups (8.2% vs 9.7%; risk ratio [RR] = 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-1.01, P = .07, I2 = 0%), RIPC significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative AKI (22% vs 24.4%; RR = 0.86, 95% CI, 0.77-0.97, P = .01, I2 = 34%). The subgroup analyses showed that RIPC was associated with a reduced incidence of MI in non-high-risk patients, and that RIPC was associated with a reduced incidence of AKI in volatile only anesthesia, in non-high-risk patients, and in the studies using AKIN or KDIGO criteria for AKI diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrates that RIPC reduces the incidence of AKI after cardiac surgery. This renoprotective effect of RIPC is mainly evident during volatile only anesthesia, in non-high-risk patients, and when AKIN or KDIGO criteria used for AKI diagnosis.

Effect of Remote Ischemic Conditioning on Bleeding Complications in Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is administered with an inflatable tourniquet by inducing brief, alternating cycles of limb ischemia and reperfusion. RIC possibly impacts the hemostatic system, and the intervention has been tested as protective therapy against ischemia-reperfusion injury and thrombotic complications in cardiac surgery and other surgical procedures. In the present systematic review, we aimed to investigate the effect of RIC on intraoperative and postoperative bleeding complications in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials including adult patients undergoing surgery. A systematic search was performed on November 7, 2020 in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Randomized controlled trials comparing RIC versus no RIC in adult patients undergoing surgery that reported bleeding outcomes in English publications were included. Effect estimates with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the random-effects model for intraoperative and postoperative bleeding outcomes. Thirty-two randomized controlled trials with 3,804 patients were eligible for inclusion. RIC did not affect intraoperative bleeding volume (nine trials; 392 RIC patients, 399 controls) with the effect estimate -0.95 [-9.90; 7.99] mL (p = 0.83). RIC significantly reduced postoperative drainage volume (seven trials; 367 RIC patients, 365 controls) with mean difference -83.6 [-134.9; -32.4] mL (p = 0.001). The risk of re-operation for bleeding was reduced in the RIC group (16 trials; 838 RIC patients, 839 controls), albeit not significantly, with the relative risk 0.65 [0.39; 1.09] (p = 0.10). In conclusion, RIC reduced postoperative bleeding measured by postoperative drainage volume in this meta-analysis of adult patients undergoing surgery.