Prevalence of aPhosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies and association with antiphospholipid antibody profiles in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Rethinking antiphospholipid syndrome to guide future management and research

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) consists of thrombotic, non-thrombotic and obstetric clinical manifestations developing in individuals with persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Although researchers have made progress in characterizing different clinical phenotypes of aPL-positive people, the current approach to clinical management is still mostly based on a 'one size fits all' strategy, which is derived from the results of a limited number of prospective, controlled studies. With the 2023 publication of the ACR-EULAR APS classification criteria, it is now possible to rethink APS, to lay the groundwork for subphenotyping through novel pathophysiology-informed approaches, and to set a future APS research agenda guided by unmet needs in clinical management.

Noncriteria antiphospholipid antibodies in antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease characterized by thrombotic manifestations and/or obstetric complications in patients with persistently positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). aPL are a heterogeneous group of autoantibodies, but only lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin (aCL), and antibeta2-glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ2GPI) IgG or IgM are included as laboratory classification criteria. Seronegative APS patients are usually defined as patients with the clinical symptoms of APS but who test negative for aPL. The negativity to classic aPL criteria does not exclude the presence of other aPL. Several noncriteria aPL have been identified. Some noncriteria aPL are well studied, such as IgA aCL and aβ2GPI, the antiphosphatidylserine-prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies, and the antibodies against the domain I of beta2-glycoprotein I (aDI), both latter groups receiving more attention for their role in thrombotic events and pregnancy complications. Other noncriteria aPL that have been studied are antibodies against annexin V, prothrombin, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol, vimentin-cardiolipin complex, anti-protein S/protein C. Measurement of some of these noncriteria aPL (aPS/PT, aDI) is useful in the laboratory work-out of APS in specific situations. We have to differentiate between patients who are positive for noncriteria aPL only, and patients who have both criteria and noncriteria aPL to enable us to study their role in the diagnosis or risk stratification of APS. The research on noncriteria aPL is continually developing as the clinical relevance of these antibodies is not yet fully clarified.

Non-criteria autoantibodies in antiphospholipid syndrome may be associated with underlying disease activity

BACKGROUND

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disorder characterized by persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) with arterial and venous thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity. In recent years, several studies have highlighted the potential role of non-criteria aPL in diagnosing APS patients.

AIM

This study aimed to determine the association of the presence of non-criteria aPL antibodies to the clinical and laboratory features of patients with a diagnosis of APS.

METHODS

Eighty patients diagnosed with APS and under observation in the rheumatology clinic of Ankara City Hospital were assessed. Patient demographic and clinical features were meticulously recorded. Non-criteria antibodies tested in our center included antiphosphatidylserine IgA, antiphosphatidylserine IgM, beta 2 glycoprotein IgA, anti-cardiolipin IgA, antiphospholipid antibody IgG, and antiphospholipid antibody IgM. Antibodies from patients who were tested for at least one non-criteria antibody were documented.

RESULTS

Out of 80 patients, 55 (68.8%) were tested for at least one non-criteria antibody, and 29 of those patients (52.7%) tested positive for at least one non-criteria antibody. The antiphospholipid antibody IgM and the beta 2 glycoprotein IgA were the most commonly tested non-criteria antibodies. Patients with non-criteria antibody positivity had a higher frequency of Ds DNA positivity and low complement (62.0% vs. 35.0%, p = 0.042; 69.0% vs. 38.0%, p = 0.023), respectively. In addition, positivity for anti-cardiolipin IgG and b2 glycoprotein IgG was significantly higher in the group positive for non-criteria antibodies (79% vs. 31%, p ≤ 0.001; 72.0% vs. 19%, p ≤ 0.001). There was no significant difference between the clinical features of patients with at least one positivity for non-criteria antibodies and those without.

CONCLUSION

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is the most commonly associated disease with APS, being present in approximately 35% of cases [1]. Since the majority of the patient group in our study had APS that was secondary to SLE, non-criteria antibody positivity may be linked to the immunological activity of SLE. Large multicenter studies are necessary to investigate the clinical significance of isolated/combined positivity for criterion/non-criteria aPLs.

The lupus anticoagulant titer is associated with elevated antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin immunoglobulin-M isotype antibody levels

BACKGROUND

Clot based assays used for lupus anticoagulant (LAC) detection are typically interpreted in a qualitative fashion and may not reflect LAC potency. In this cross-sectional study, we describe a method for quantifying the LAC titer using serial (dependent) two-fold dilutions in normal pooled plasma.

METHODS

Serial dilutions of 51 residual plasma samples from 50 patients were tested using the Russell's viper venom screening time (DRVVT) and activated partial thromboplastin screening time (APTT) methodologies. The measured clotting times and the corresponding dilution factors were then used to derive a four-parameter logistic model. The LAC titer for each patient was interpolated as the sample dilution that corresponds to the upper reference interval limit of the corresponding assay.

RESULTS

Calculated APTT and DRVVT LAC titers displayed a strong linear correlation (R2  = 0.84) between each other, but not with the degree of prolongation of the APTT/DRVVT screening time in the neat undiluted samples. Using data driven partitioning, patients could be grouped into low (<10) or high (≥10) DRVVT LAC titer. There were no significant differences in anticardiolipin (aCL) or anti-beta 2 glycoprotein 1 (aB2GPI) antibody levels or prevalence of thromboembolic events between low and high LAC titer groups. In contrast, antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) IgM antibody levels, but not IgG, were significantly higher in the high LAC titer group.

CONCLUSIONS

The degree of prolongation of the APTT/DRVVT screening time is not correlated with the LAC titer. Only aPS/PT IgM antibodies levels were strongly correlated with the LAC titers. Additional studies are warranted to determine clinical implications of high LAC titers.

Viewpoint: The value of non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies

In 2006, at a meeting in Sydney, Australia, consensus was reached by an international group of specialists to establish a number of serological criteria that identify patients with a history of thrombosis or pregnancy complications as having antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). These criteria were originally formulated for research purposes and to compare clinical trials in different centres. However, these same criteria are now generally used and accepted for the diagnosis and treatment of patients. The practice of using these criteria for direct patient care requires that these criteria are based on sound scientific evidence. Indeed, for all the autoantibodies that are officially included in the serological criteria, it has been shown that they induce thrombosis and fetal loss when infused into mice. There are also a number of additional autoantibodies that have been identified in these patients but for these antibodies there was not enough evidence to meet the official APS criteria in 2006. Seventeen years have now passed since the consensus meeting, therefore, this review examines whether additional studies performed with these 'non-criteria' autoantibodies have provided sufficient results to suggest the inclusion of these autoantibodies in the official serological criteria of APS.

Viewpoint: Lupus anticoagulant detection and interpretation in antiphospholipid syndrome

Lupus anticoagulant (LA) is a well-established risk factor for the clinical manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Accurate LA detection is an essential prerequisite for optimal diagnosis and management of patients with APS or aPL carriers. Variability remains a challenge in LA testing, with reliable detection influenced by multiple factors, including pre-analytical conditions, anticoagulation treatment, choice of tests and procedures performed, as well as interpretation of results, that can lead to false-positives or negatives. A standardised approach to LA testing, following current guidance, based on published data and international consensus, and with attention to detail, is required to underpin accurate detection of LA. Future work should focus on better characterisation of the nature of LA, which may ultimately lead to improved diagnosis and management of patients with APS and aPL carriers. This article reviews current practice and challenges, providing an overview on detection of LA.

Anti-phosphatidyl-serine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies are superior predictors of LAC presence and APS diagnoses: A single center study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Several non-criteria (NC) anti-phospholipid antibodies (APLA) have been proposed as candidates for antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) diagnosis. The objectives of this study were 1) to determine the association of five different NC-APLA with positivity for Lupus anti-coagulant (LAC) and the criteria antibodies anti-cardiolipin (aCL) and anti-beta glycoprotein (aB2GPI), and 2) to assess the ability of NC-APLA to predict LAC presence and clinical APS diagnoses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Results from 486 patients tested for LAC and APLA were retrieved. Patients were grouped according to LAC and serology positivity into three groups: Single-positives (SP) for LAC, aCL or aB2GPI; Double-positives for aCL and aB2GPI; Triple-positives (TP) for LAC, aCL and aB2GPI. NC-ALPA titers were compared between LAC-positive and negative and APS and non-APS patients.

RESULTS

Forty-two of 486 patients were LAC-positive and 28 were diagnosed with APS. All criteria and NC-APLA titers were significantly higher in TP than SP patients. ROC analyses based on LAC status showed highest area under the curve (AUC, 95% CI) for aPS/PT IgG (0.75, 0.65-0.85) and aPS/PT IgM (0.73, 0.63-0.82). Based on APS diagnosis, aPS/PT IgM achieved highest AUC (0.87; 0.79-0.95).

CONCLUSION

Anti-phosphatidyl-serine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies are superior predictors of LAC presence and APS diagnoses.

Beyond the classics: The emerging value of anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies in antiphospholipid syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs), which can lead to thrombosis and pregnancy complications. Within the diverse range of aPLs, anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) have gained significance in clinical practice. The detection of aPS/PT has proven valuable in identifying APS patients and stratifying their risk, especially when combined with other aPL tests like lupus anticoagulant (LA) and anti-β2-glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI). Multivariate analyses have confirmed aPS/PT as an independent risk factor for vascular thrombosis and obstetric complications, with its inclusion in the aPL score and the Global Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome Score (GAPSS) aiding in risk evaluation. However, challenges remain in the laboratory testing of aPS/PT, including the need for assay standardization and its lower sensitivity in certain patient populations. Further research is necessary to validate the clinical utility of aPS/PT antibodies in APS diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.

Close link between antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies, lupus anticoagulant, and activated protein C resistance in tetra antiphospholipid antibody-positive subjects

BACKGROUND

Most of the carriers/patients triple-positive for antiphospholipid antibodies (lupus anticoagulant [LAC], immunoglobulin G [IgG]/immunoglobulin M [IgM] anticardiolipin, and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies) are tetra-positive, being positive for antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) antibodies. The relationship between aPS/PT titer, LAC potency, and resistance to activated protein C (aPC-R) has not been investigated.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to clarify the mutual interdependence of these parameters in tetra-positive subjects.

METHODS

Twenty-three carriers and 30 patients with antiphospholipid syndrome, none of whom were being treated with anticoagulants, and 30 age- and sex-matched controls were studied. Detection of aPS/PT, LAC, and aPC-R in each individual was performed with established methods in our laboratory. Carriers and patients were positive for IgG or IgM aPS/PT or for both isotypes without significant difference. Since both IgG and IgM aPS/PT have anticoagulant activity, we used the sum of their titers (total aPS/PT) for the correlation studies.

RESULTS

Total aPS/PT in all individuals studied exceeded that in controls. There was no difference in total aPS/PT titers (P = .72), LAC potency (P = .56), and aPC-R (P = .82) between antiphospholipid antibody-carriers and patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. There was a significant correlation between total aPS/PT and LAC potency (r = 0.78; P < .0001) and between total aPS/PT titers and aPC-R (r = 0.80; P < .0001). LAC potency also was correlated significantly with aPC-R (r = 0.72; P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that there is interdependence between aPS/PT, LAC potency, and aPC-R.

Cerebral venous thrombosis in patients with autoimmune disease, hematonosis or coronavirus disease 2019: Many familiar faces and some strangers

BACKGROUND

Cerebral venous thrombosis, a rare stroke, is characterized by neurological dysfunction caused by bleeding and/or infarction resulting from venous sinus thrombosis, the so-called venous stroke. Current guidelines recommend anticoagulants as first-line therapy in the treatment of venous stroke. With complicated causes of cerebral venous thrombosis, treatment is difficult, especially when combined with autoimmune diseases, blood diseases, and even COVID-19.

AIMS

This review summarizes the pathophysiological mechanisms, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and clinical prognosis of cerebral venous thrombosis combined with autoimmune diseases, blood diseases, or infectious diseases such as COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

A systematic understanding of particular risk factors that should not be neglected when unconventional cerebral venous thrombosis occurs and for a scientific understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical diagnosis, and treatment, thus contributing to knowledge on special types of venous stroke.

Criteria and Non-Criteria Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: How Strong Are They Correlated?

The place of non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) in the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is still debatable. The aim of this research was to evaluate the correlations between the titres of non-criteria aPLs (anti-phosphatidylethanolamine (aPE), anti-phosphatidylserine (aPS), and anti-prothrombin (aPT) antibodies), and the ones of the already studied criteria aPLs (anti-cardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β2 glycoprotein I-aβ2GPI antibodies). Altogether, 72 APS (30 primary and 42 secondary) patients were included in our study. High correlation coefficients (rs) were found between aPS IgM and aCL IgM, overall (0.77, p < 0.01), as well as in the primary (0.81, p < 0.01), and secondary (0.75, p < 0.01) APS subgroups. Low or statistically insignificant correlations were observed between IgG/IgM isotypes of aPT and aCL, or aβ2GPI, in the entire study population, and when evaluating the subgroups. Therefore, moderate correlations were mainly identified between the tested non-criteria antibodies and the criteria ones, suggesting little added value for the use of the tested non-criteria aPLs, with the exception of aPT, which seems to have different kinetics and might be a promising APS diagnostic tool.

Added value of antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies in the workup of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibodies

BACKGROUND

The added value of antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT) in the diagnostic workup of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is unclear. Currently, diagnosis of thrombotic APS (TAPS) and obstetric APS (OAPS) requires persistent presence of lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anticardiolipin (aCL) immunoglobulin (Ig) G/IgM, or anti-β2-glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) IgG/IgM antibodies.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the role of aPS/PT IgG and IgM in OAPS.

METHODS

aPS/PT IgG/IgM, aCL IgG/IgM, aβ2GPI IgG/IgM, and LAC were determined in 653 patients (OAPS, TAPS, and controls). In-house aPS/PT cut-off values were calculated, titers and prevalence were compared between OAPS, TAPS, and controls and type of pregnancy morbidity. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI were calculated.

RESULTS

In OAPS, aPS/PT IgG and IgM showed an OR of 4.32 (95% CI, 2.54-7.36) and 3.37 (95% CI, 1.93-5.89), respectively, but the association was not independent of LAC. Prevalence and titers of aPS/PT IgG and IgM were lower in OAPS than in patients with TAPS. aPS/PT were more prevalent and showed higher titers in patients with late pregnancy loss than in patients with early pregnancy loss with a positivity of 86.4% and 39.3%, respectively. Higher aPS/PT titers did not increase the likelihood of having OAPS.

CONCLUSION

The added value of aPS/PT testing in the current diagnostic workup of OAPS seems limited compared with LAC, aCL, and aβ2GPI. aPS/PT might be useful in specific subsets of patients with OAPS. However, future multicentric studies are needed to elucidate the risk of less frequent and most severe obstetrical manifestations.

An Antiphospholipid Antibody Profile as a Biomarker for Thrombophilia in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Despite recent advances in treatment and significant improvements in prognosis, thrombosis remains the major cause of death in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are the main triggers of thrombosis in patients with SLE, with a frequency of approximately 30-40%. Lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies, which are included in the criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome, and 'non-criteria' aPL such as anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin complex antibodies, are risk factors for thrombosis in patients with SLE. Multiple positivity for aPL is also associated with an increased risk of thrombosis, and scores calculated from aPL profiles can predict the risk of developing thrombosis. Although there is insufficient evidence for treatment, aPL-positive SLE patients should/may be treated with anticoagulants and/or low-dose aspirin as appropriate. This review summarises the evidence on the clinical significance of the aPL profile as a biomarker of thrombophilia in patients with SLE.

From Co-Infections to Autoimmune Disease via Hyperactivated Innate Immunity: COVID-19 Autoimmune Coagulopathies, Autoimmune Myocarditis and Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children

Neutrophilia and the production of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are two of many measures of increased inflammation in severe COVID-19 that also accompany its autoimmune complications, including coagulopathies, myocarditis and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). This paper integrates currently disparate measures of innate hyperactivation in severe COVID-19 and its autoimmune complications, and relates these to SARS-CoV-2 activation of innate immunity. Aggregated data include activation of Toll-like receptors (TLRs), nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD) receptors, NOD leucine-rich repeat and pyrin-domain-containing receptors (NLRPs), retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I) and melanoma-differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA-5). SARS-CoV-2 mainly activates the virus-associated innate receptors TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, NLRP3, RIG-1 and MDA-5. Severe COVID-19, however, is characterized by additional activation of TLR1, TLR2, TLR4, TLR5, TLR6, NOD1 and NOD2, which are primarily responsive to bacterial antigens. The innate activation patterns in autoimmune coagulopathies, myocarditis and Kawasaki disease, or MIS-C, mimic those of severe COVID-19 rather than SARS-CoV-2 alone suggesting that autoimmunity follows combined SARS-CoV-2-bacterial infections. Viral and bacterial receptors are known to synergize to produce the increased inflammation required to support autoimmune disease pathology. Additional studies demonstrate that anti-bacterial antibodies are also required to account for known autoantigen targets in COVID-19 autoimmune complications.

Antiphospholipid antibodies in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Acquired thrombophilia and in particular the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) may play an important role in the development of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Young patients suffering from an episode of unprovoked pulmonary embolism (PE), or PE provoked by mild risk factors, should be tested for aPL. In case of a positive result, they should be closely followed up and lifelong anticoagulant treatment should be considered. Indeed, aPL-induced thrombophilia may favor PE recurrence with the consequence of possible CTEPH development. The aPL profiles play an important role in this pathway. Patients with PE and triple positivity (lupus anticoagulant, LAC, anti-cardiolipin, aCL, and anti-β2-glycoprotein I, aβ2GPI) are at the highest risk of recurrence and deserve maximum protection by anticoagulant treatment with warfarin.

Determination of Thrombogenicity Levels of Various Antiphospholipid Antibodies by a Modified Thrombin Generation Assay in Patients with Suspected Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a hypercoagulable state accompanied by the presence of heterogeneous antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), which nonspecifically affect hemostasis by the presence of lupus anticoagulans (LA), anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), antibodies against β2-glycoprotein-I (anti-β2GPI), but also non-criteria antibodies such as antibodies against β2-glycoprotein-I domain I (anti-DI), anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (anti-PS/PT), anti-annexin V, and many others. The main target of the antibodies is the activated protein C (APC) system, the elimination of which can manifest itself as a thrombotic complication. The aim of this study was to determine the thrombogenicity of antibodies using a modified protein C-activated thrombin generation assay (TGA) on a group of 175 samples suspected of APS. TGA was measured with/without APC and the ratio of both measurements was evaluated (as for APC resistance), where a cut-off was calculated ≤4.5 (90th percentile) using 21 patients with heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation (FV Leiden heterozygous). Our study demonstrates the well-known fact that multiple positivity of different aPLs is a more severe risk for thrombosis than single positivity. Of the single antibody positivity, LA antibodies are the most serious (p value < 0.01), followed by aCL and their subgroup anti-DI (p value < 0.05). Non-criteria antibodies anti-annexin V and anti-PT/PS has a similar frequency occurrence of thrombogenicity as LA antibodies but without statistical significance or anti-β2GPI1 positivity. The modified TGA test can help us identify patients in all groups who are also at risk for recurrent thrombotic and pregnancy complications; thus, long-term prophylactic treatment is appropriate. For this reason, it is proving increasingly beneficial to include the determination antibodies in combination with modified TGA test.