HGF-modified human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells rescue impaired ovarian reserve function in chemotherapy-induced POI rats by improving angiogenesis while decreasing apoptosis and fibrosis in the ovary

Ovarian microenvironment: challenges and opportunities in protecting against chemotherapy-associated ovarian damage

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-associated ovarian damage (CAOD) is one of the most feared short- and long-term side effects of anticancer treatment in premenopausal women. Accumulating detailed data show that different chemotherapy regimens can lead to disturbance of ovarian hormone levels, reduced or lost fertility, and an increased risk of early menopause. Previous studies have often focused on the direct effects of chemotherapeutic drugs on ovarian follicles, such as direct DNA damage-mediated apoptotic death and primordial follicle burnout. Emerging evidence has revealed an imbalance in the ovarian microenvironment during chemotherapy. The ovarian microenvironment provides nutritional support and transportation of signals that stimulate the growth and development of follicles, ovulation, and corpus luteum formation. The close interaction between the ovarian microenvironment and follicles can determine ovarian function. Therefore, designing novel and precise strategies to manipulate the ovarian microenvironment may be a new strategy to protect ovarian function during chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

This review details the changes that occur in the ovarian microenvironment during chemotherapy and emphasizes the importance of developing new therapeutics that protect ovarian function by targeting the ovarian microenvironment during chemotherapy.

SEARCH METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature was performed by searching PubMed up to April 2024. Search terms included 'ovarian microenvironment' (ovarian extracellular matrix, ovarian stromal cells, ovarian interstitial, ovarian blood vessels, ovarian lymphatic vessels, ovarian macrophages, ovarian lymphocytes, ovarian immune cytokines, ovarian oxidative stress, ovarian reactive oxygen species, ovarian senescence cells, ovarian senescence-associated secretory phenotypes, ovarian oogonial stem cells, ovarian stem cells), terms related to ovarian function (reproductive health, fertility, infertility, fecundity, ovarian reserve, ovarian function, menopause, decreased ovarian reserve, premature ovarian insufficiency/failure), and terms related to chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, lfosfamide, chlormethine, chlorambucil, busulfan, melphalan, procarbazine, cisplatin, doxorubicin, carboplatin, taxane, paclitaxel, docetaxel, 5-fluorouraci, vincristine, methotrexate, dactinomycin, bleomycin, mercaptopurine).

OUTCOMES

The ovarian microenvironment shows great changes during chemotherapy, inducing extracellular matrix deposition and stromal fibrosis, angiogenesis disorders, immune microenvironment disturbance, oxidative stress imbalances, ovarian stem cell exhaustion, and cell senescence, thereby lowering the quantity and quality of ovarian follicles. Several methods targeting the ovarian microenvironment have been adopted to prevent and treat CAOD, such as stem cell therapy and the use of free radical scavengers, senolytherapies, immunomodulators, and proangiogenic factors.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

Ovarian function is determined by its 'seeds' (follicles) and 'soil' (ovarian microenvironment). The ovarian microenvironment has been reported to play a vital role in CAOD and targeting the ovarian microenvironment may present potential therapeutic approaches for CAOD. However, the relation between the ovarian microenvironment, its regulatory networks, and CAOD needs to be further studied. A better understanding of these issues could be helpful in explaining the pathogenesis of CAOD and creating innovative strategies for counteracting the effects exerted on ovarian function. Our aim is that this narrative review of CAOD will stimulate more research in this important field.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

Not applicable.

Protective role of stem cells in POI: Current status and mechanism of action, a review article

Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) has far-reaching consequences on women's life quality. Due to the lack of full recognition of the etiology and complexity of this disease, there is no appropriate treatment for infected patients. Recently, stem cell therapy has attracted the attention of regenerative medicine scholars and offered promising outcomes for POI patients. Several kinds of stem cells, such as embryonic stem cells (ESCs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have been used for the treatment of ovarian diseases. However, their potential protective mechanisms are still unknown. Undoubtedly, a better understanding of the therapeutic molecular and cellular mechanisms of stem cells will address uncover strategies to increase their clinical application for multiple disorders such as POI. This paper describes a detailed account of the potential properties of different types of stem cells and provides a comprehensive review of their protective mechanisms, particularly MSC, in POI disorder. In addition, ongoing challenges and several strategies to improve the efficacy of MSC in clinical use are addressed. Therefore, this review will provide proof-of-concept for further clinical application of stem cells in POI.

The Functions and Application Prospects of Hepatocyte Growth Factor in Reproduction

Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) is expressed in multiple systems and mediates a variety of biological activities, such as mitosis, motility, and morphogenesis. A growing number of studies have revealed the expression patterns and functions of HGF in ovarian and testicular physiology from the prenatal to the adult stage. HGF regulates folliculogenesis and steroidogenesis by modulating the functions of theca cells and granulosa cells in the ovary. It also mediates somatic cell proliferation and steroidogenesis, thereby affecting spermatogenesis in males. In addition to its physiological effects on the reproductive system, HGF has shown advantages in preclinical studies over recent years for the treatment of male and female infertility, particularly in women with premature ovarian insufficiency. This review aims to summarize the pleiotropic functions of HGF in the reproductive system and to provide prospects for its clinical application.

Use of mesenchymal stem cells to enhance or restore fertility potential: a systematic review of available experimental strategies

STUDY QUESTION

To what extent does regenerative medicine with stem cell therapy help to address infertility issues for future clinical application?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Regenerative medicine using different stem cell sources is yielding promising results in terms of protecting the ovarian reserve from damage and senescence, and improving fertility potential in various preclinical settings.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Regenerative medicine using stem cell therapy is emerging as a potential strategy to address a number of issues in the field of human reproduction. Indeed, different types of adult and fetal mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been tested with promising results, owing to their ability to differentiate into different tissue lineages, move toward specific injured sites (homing), and generate a secretome with wound-healing, proangiogenic, and antioxidant capacities.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

Guided by the checklist for preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, we retrieved relevant studies from PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases until June 2023 using the following keywords: 'mesenchymal stem cells' AND 'ovarian follicles' OR 'ovarian tissue culture' OR 'ovarian follicle culture' OR 'cumulus oocyte complex'. Only peer-reviewed published articles written in English were included.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

The primary outcome for the experimental strategies was evaluation of the ovarian reserve, with a focus on follicle survival, number, and growth. Secondary outcomes involved analyses of other parameters associated with the follicle pool, such as hormones and growth factors, ovarian tissue viability markers including oxidative stress levels, oocyte growth and maturation rates, and of course pregnancy outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Preclinical studies exploring MSCs from different animal origins and tissue sources in specific conditions were selected (n = 112), including: in vitro culture of granulosa cells, ovarian tissue and isolated ovarian follicles; ovarian tissue transplantation; and systemic or intraovarian injection after gonadotoxic or age-related follicle pool decline. Protecting the ovarian reserve from aging and gonadotoxic damage has been widely tested in vitro and in vivo using murine models and is now yielding initial data in the first ever case series of patients with premature ovarian insufficiency. Use of MSCs as feeder cells in ovarian tissue culture was found to improve follicle outcomes and oocyte competence, bringing us one step closer to future clinical application. MSCs also have proved effective at boosting revascularization in the transplantation site when grafting ovarian tissue in experimental animal models.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

While preclinical results look promising in terms of protecting the ovarian reserve in different experimental models (especially those in vitro using various mammal experimental models and in vivo using murine models), there is still a lot of work to do before this approach can be considered safe and successfully implemented in a clinical setting.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

All gathered data on the one hand show that regenerative medicine techniques are quickly gaining ground among innovative techniques being developed for future clinical application in the field of reproductive medicine. After proving MSC effectiveness in preclinical settings, there is still a lot of work to do before MSCs can be safely and effectively used in different clinical applications.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

This study was supported by grants from the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique de Belgique (FNRS-PDR T.0077.14, FNRS-CDR J.0063.20, and grant 5/4/150/5 awarded to Marie-Madeleine Dolmans), Fonds Spéciaux de Recherche, and the Fondation St Luc. None of the authors have any competing interest to disclose.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.