Equity in Health: Consideration of Race and Ethnicity in Precision Medicine

Race, ethnicity, and ancestry reporting in genetic counseling research: A focused mapping review and synthesis

Studies on the use of Race, Ethnicity, and Ancestry (REA) concepts and terms in genetic research are limited. We aimed to describe the collection, reporting, and use of REA data in genetic counseling research. We undertook a focused mapping review and synthesis of the Journal of Genetic Counseling 2021 publications. We used a mapping proforma based on the Race, Ethnicity, And Culture in Health checklist to extract data. Of the 177 screened articles, 132 met our inclusion criteria of reporting primary data about participants. The sample REA characteristics were described in 80 (61%) articles, with 6% providing a definition or conceptualization of the REA term/s used and 23% including a rationale for their study in terms of REA factors. Group labels were most often reported using population descriptors, such as "race," "ethnicity," "race/ethnicity," and "ancestry." Several group labels were used under different population descriptors. For instance, the group labels "White" and "Asian" were used under all population descriptors. Most studies (79%) ascertained REA characteristics by participants' self-report. Three (15%) of the 20 qualitative studies mentioned the relevance of the interviewers' REA characteristics in relation to the participants' REA characteristics. Of the 55 quantitative studies, 19 (35%) used REA factors in the data analysis. Of the 80 articles describing the sample REA characteristics, 20% referred moderately or a great deal to any REA factors in the results interpretation, 46% acknowledged the REA factors in the study limitations, and 15% discussed the implications of REA reporting for genetic counseling practice. Our review documents extensive variation in how sample REA characteristics are described and used in genetic counseling research. Our findings provide a baseline against which to evaluate the effects of guidelines and recommendations for the collection, responsible use, and report of participants' REA characteristics in genetic counseling research.

Breaking barriers: fostering equitable access to pediatric genomics through innovative care models and technologies

The integration of genomic medicine into pediatric clinical practice is a critical need that remains largely unmet, especially in socioeconomically challenged and rural areas where healthcare disparities are most pronounced. This review seeks to summarize the barriers responsible for delayed diagnosis and treatment, and examines diverse care models, technological innovations, and strategies for dissemination and implementation aimed at addressing the evolving genomic needs of pediatric populations. Through a comprehensive review of the literature, we explore proposed methodologies to bridge this gap in pediatric healthcare, with a specific emphasis on understanding and speeding implementation approaches and technologies to mitigate disparities in underserved populations, including rural and marginalized communities. There are both external and internal factors to consider in demographic and social determinants when evaluating patient access. To address these barriers, potential solutions include telegenetic services, alternative care delivery models, pediatric subspecialist expansion, and non-genetic provider education. By improving access to pediatric genomic services, therapeutic interventions will also be more available to all pediatric patients. IMPACT STATEMENT: Genomic testing has clinical utility in pediatric populations but access for people from diverse demographic and social-economic groups is problematic. Understanding barriers responsible for delayed genetic diagnosis and treatment in pediatric populations will improve reach, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of genomic medicine in pediatric healthcare context. Innovative care models, adaptation of appropriate technologies, and strategies aimed at addressing pediatric genomic needs are needed.

An Interdisciplinary Perspective on Improving Cancer Care in the State of Mississippi as an Example of Cancer Care Improvements in the Global South

Cancer disparities, a critical public health issue, particularly in states such as Mississippi, where socioeconomic factors significantly influence health outcomes, require our collective attention. This paper delves into the multifaceted nature of cancer disparities through a macro-level analysis of cancer data, specifically focusing on Mississippi as a microcosm of broader national and global trends. Two key indices, the Socio-Demographic Index (SDI) and the Social Deprivation Index (SDeI), provide valuable insights. The former offers a macro-level understanding of the socioeconomic factors that shape health and cancer outcomes. The latter quantifies disadvantages in small areas, identifying regions that need scientific, policy, and administrative support. The poor health care and cancer care (CC) outcomes in Mississippi are well documented and detailed here. However, SDI and SDeI data are not yet available in Mississippi. With biological, technological, and clinical research design advancements and other new innovative strategies emerging in the past decade in CC, a 'leapfrogging' of CC outcomes in Mississippi is within our reach. To achieve this goal, an interdisciplinary approach (IDA) addressing and solving the challenges faced in Mississippi is required. The IDA team must include disciplines that can determine SDI and SDeI for Mississippi and tie those findings to successfully apply new technological advances and innovations efficiently and cost-effectively by building infrastructure and developing implementation strategies. This can serve as a pilot demonstration project that will also help other similar regions within the United States, as well as the Global South.

Striving for Equity: Examining Health Disparities in Urologic Oncology

Health disparities in urologic oncology, particularly in prostate, bladder, kidney, and testicular cancers, significantly impact patient outcomes across different demographic groups. This narrative review aims to investigate the extent and drivers of these disparities, focusing on the influence of race, socioeconomic status, and geographic location on diagnosis, treatment, and survival outcomes. We conducted a comprehensive review of the existing literature and analyzed data from national cancer databases to identify patterns of inequity. Our findings reveal that minority populations, individuals with lower socioeconomic status, and those residing in underserved areas are less likely to receive timely and guideline-based care, leading to worse outcomes. This review underscores the urgent need for targeted interventions, including policy reforms, health system restructuring, enhanced community outreach, and increased funding for disparity-focused research, to ensure equitable access to high-quality oncologic care. Addressing these disparities is crucial for improving cancer outcomes and achieving health equity in urologic oncology.

A Children's Rights Framework for Genomic Medicine: Newborn Screening as a Use Case

The year 2023 marked the 60th anniversary of screening newborns in the United States for diseases that benefit from early identification and intervention. All around the world, the goal of NBS is to facilitate timely diagnosis and management to improve individual health outcomes in all newborns regardless of their place of birth, economic circumstances, ability to pay for treatment, and access to healthcare. Advances in technology to screen and treat disease have led to a rapid increase in the number of screened conditions, and innovations in genomics are expected to exponentially expand this number further. A system where all newborns are screened, coupled with rapid technological innovation, provides a unique opportunity to improve pediatric health outcomes and advance children's rights, including the unique rights of sick and disabled children. This is especially timely as we approach the 100th anniversary of the 1924 Geneva Declaration of the Rights of the Child, which includes children's right to healthcare, and the 1989 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child that expanded upon this aspect and affirmed each child's right to the highest attainable standard of health. In this manuscript, we provide background on the evolving recognition of the rights of children and the foundational rights to healthcare and non-discrimination, provide two examples that highlight issues to access and equity in newborn screening that may limit a child's right to healthcare and best possible outcomes, detail ways the current approach to newborn screening advances the rights of the child, and finally, propose that the incorporation of genomics into newborn screening presents a useful case study to recognize and uphold the rights of every child.

Should secondary pharmacogenomic variants be actively screened and reported when diagnostic genome-wide sequencing is performed in a child?

This white paper was prepared by the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health Regulatory and Ethics Work Stream's Pediatric Task Team to review and provide perspective with respect to ethical, legal, and social issues regarding the return of secondary pharmacogenomic variants in children who have a serious disease or developmental disorder and are undergoing exome or genome sequencing to identify a genetic cause of their condition. We discuss actively searching for and reporting pharmacogenetic/genomic variants in pediatric patients, different methods of returning secondary pharmacogenomic findings to the patient/parents and/or treating clinicians, maintaining these data in the patient's health record over time, decision supports to assist using pharmacogenetic results in future treatment decisions, and sharing information in public databases to improve the clinical interpretation of pharmacogenetic variants identified in other children. We conclude by presenting a series of points to consider for clinicians and policymakers regarding whether, and under what circumstances, routine screening and return of pharmacogenomic variants unrelated to the indications for testing is appropriate in children who are undergoing genome-wide sequencing to assist in the diagnosis of a suspected genetic disease.

Recommendations for the Equitable and Widespread Implementation of Liquid Biopsy for Cancer Care

Liquid biopsies-tests that detect circulating tumor cellular components in the bloodstream-have the potential to transform cancer by reducing health inequities in screening, diagnostics, and monitoring. Today, liquid biopsies are being used to guide treatment choices for patients and monitor for cancer recurrence, and promising work in multi-cancer early detection is ongoing. However, without awareness of the barriers to adoption of this new technology and a willingness to build mitigation efforts into the implementation of widespread liquid biopsy testing, the communities that could most benefit may be the last to access and use them. In this work, we review the challenges likely to affect the accessibility of liquid biopsies in both the general population and underserved populations, and recommend specific actions to facilitate equitable access for all patients.

Recent Advances in Skin-Interfaced Wearable Sweat Sensors: Opportunities for Equitable Personalized Medicine and Global Health Diagnostics

Recent advances in skin-interfaced wearable sweat sensors enable the noninvasive, real-time monitoring of biochemical signals associated with health and wellness. These wearable platforms leverage microfluidic channels, biochemical sensors, and flexible electronics to enable the continuous analysis of sweat-based biomarkers such as electrolytes, metabolites, and hormones. As this field continues to mature, the potential of low-cost, continuous personalized health monitoring enabled by such wearable sensors holds significant promise for addressing some of the formidable obstacles to delivering comprehensive medical care in under-resourced settings. This Perspective highlights the transformative potential of wearable sweat sensing for providing equitable access to cutting-edge healthcare diagnostics, especially in remote or geographically isolated areas. It examines the current understanding of sweat composition as well as recent innovations in microfluidic device architectures and sensing strategies by showcasing emerging applications and opportunities for innovation. It concludes with a discussion on expanding the utility of wearable sweat sensors for clinically relevant health applications and opportunities for enabling equitable access to innovation to address existing health disparities.

A study of disparities in access to genetic care pre- and post-pandemic

We aimed to explore the delivery of pediatric genetic care before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and assess if disparities in care existed or emerged. We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical record for patients 18 years old or younger seen in the Division of Pediatric Genetics between September 2019-March 2020 and April-October 2020. Outcomes included time between referral and new visit, recommendation and completion of genetic testing and/or follow-up visit within 6 months, and telemedicine versus in-person format. Outcomes were compared pre- and post-COVID-19 emergence across ethnicity, race, age, health insurance, socioeconomic status (SES), and use of medical interpretation services. Three hundred thirteen total records were reviewed with comparable demographics between cohorts. Cohort 2 had shorter times between referral and new visit, greater telemedicine utilization, and a greater proportion of testing completed. Younger patients tended to have shorter times between referral and initial visit. In Cohort 1, those with Medicaid insurance or no coverage had longer referral-initial visit times. In Cohort 2, there were differences in testing recommendation based on age. For all outcomes, no disparities were observed across ethnicity, race, SES, or use of medical interpretation services. This study characterizes the impact of the pandemic on pediatric genetics care delivery at our center and may have wider implications.

The Challenge of Recruiting Diverse Populations into Health Research: An embedded social science perspective

Addressing health disparities has become a central remit for conducting health research. In the following paper, we explore the conceptual and methodological challenges posed by the call to recruit medically underserved populations. This exploration of challenges is undertaken from the perspective of social science researchers embedded in a large within a clinical genomics research study. We suggest that these challenges are found in respect to the development of recruiting strategies, analysis of the data in respect to understanding and interpreting the experiences of being medically underserved, and in comparing the experiences of being medically underserved compared to not being underserved. By way of conclusion, it is argued that there is important role for social scientists with large health research studies which, if achieved successfully, can benefit study teams and society as a whole.

Racial and ethnic disparities in diagnostic efficacy of comprehensive genetic testing for sensorineural hearing loss

Understanding racial and ethnic disparities in diagnostic rates of genetic testing is critical for health equity. We sought to understand the extent and cause of racial and ethnic disparities in diagnostic efficacy of comprehensive genetic testing (CGT) for sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). We performed a retrospective cohort study at two tertiary children’s hospitals on a diverse cohort of 240 consecutive pediatric patients (76% publicly insured, 82% non-White) with SNHL of unknown etiology who underwent CGT. Definite and possible genetic diagnoses were assigned for each patient, representing the likelihood of a genetic cause of hearing loss. Associations between diagnostic rates were examined. 3.8 ± 2.1 variants were detected per patient; this frequency did not vary between White/Asian and Hispanic/Black cohorts. Overall, 82% of variants were variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Compared with White and Asian subjects, variants identified among Hispanic and Black children were less likely to be classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic (15% vs. 24%, p < 0.001), and Hispanic and Black children were less likely to have a definite genetic diagnosis (10% vs. 37%, p < 0.001). The adjusted odds ratio for definite genetic diagnosis in Black and Hispanic children compared with White and Asian children was 0.19. Expanding genetic diagnostic criteria to include predicted deleterious VUSs reduced these disparities between White/Asian and Hispanic/Black children, with comparable molecular diagnostic rates (41% vs. 38%, p = 0.72). However, in silico predictions are insufficiently valid for clinical use. Increased inclusion of underrepresented groups in genetic hearing-loss studies to clinically validate these variants is necessary to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in diagnostic efficacy of comprehensive genetic testing.