Self-Peptidome Variation Shapes Individual Immune Responses

Longitudinal change trend of the TCR repertoire reveals the immune response intensity of the inactivated COVID-19 vaccine

Evidence concerning the individual differences in neutralizing antibody responses after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine remains lacking. In this study, we collected the serum and Peripheral blood mononuclear cells(PBMC) of 16 subjects who had never suffered from COVID-19 before during the course of two vaccine doses. Microneutralization assay is used to determine the immune response intensity of vaccine subjects. we revealed the change trend of TCR diversity using T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing. Then, we analyzed the correlation between HLA class II allele frequencies and the intensity of immune response. Finally, we identified several CDR3 sequences related to the intensity of the immune response. We analyzed the differences in D50 (DD50) between different time points, and found that there were two patterns in the change trend of TCR diversity, and the increased diversity group has stronger immune response. The inactivated vaccine is different from the mRNA vaccine against the spike protein, resulting in differences in TCR repertoire response patterns and antibody responses, which are related to HLA-DRB1 * 09:01. The presence of specific CDR3 sequences in the increased diversity group, rather than gene usage of the VJ gene, determines the intensity and persistence of neutralizing antibody titers. Finally, We identified the different response patterns of the human TCR repertoire to inactivated vaccines. The pattern with increased diversity is more likely to appear strong and more lasting immune response.

The biogenesis of the immunopeptidome

The immunopeptidome is the repertoire of peptides bound and presented by the MHC class I, class II, and non-classical molecules. The peptides are produced by the degradation of most cellular proteins, and in some cases, peptides are produced from extracellular proteins taken up by the cells. This review attempts to first describe some of its known and well-accepted concepts, and next, raise some questions about a few of the established dogmas in this field: The production of novel peptides by splicing is questioned, suggesting here that spliced peptides are extremely rare, if existent at all. The degree of the contribution to the immunopeptidome by degradation of cellular protein by the proteasome is doubted, therefore this review attempts to explain why it is likely that this contribution to the immunopeptidome is possibly overstated. The contribution of defective ribosome products (DRiPs) and non-canonical peptides to the immunopeptidome is noted and methods are suggested to quantify them. In addition, the common misconception that the MHC class II peptidome is mostly derived from extracellular proteins is noted, and corrected. It is stressed that the confirmation of sequence assignments of non-canonical and spliced peptides should rely on targeted mass spectrometry using spiking-in of heavy isotope-labeled peptides. Finally, the new methodologies and modern instrumentation currently available for high throughput kinetics and quantitative immunopeptidomics are described. These advanced methods open up new possibilities for utilizing the big data generated and taking a fresh look at the established dogmas and reevaluating them critically.

'Cannibalism' of exogenous DNA sequences: The ancestral form of adaptive immunity which entails recognition of danger

Adaptive immunity is a sophisticated form of immune response capable of retaining the molecular memory of a very great diversity of target antigens (epitopes) as non-self. It is capable of reactivating itself upon a second encounter with an immunoglobulin or T-cell receptor antigen-binding site with a known epitope that had previously primed the host immune system. It has long been considered that adaptive immunity is a highly evolved form of non-self recognition that appeared quite late in speciation and complemented a more generalist response called innate immunity. Innate immunity offers a relatively non-specific defense (although mediated by sensors that could specifically recognize virus or bacteria compounds) and which does not retain a memory of the danger. But this notion of recent acquisition of adaptive immunity is challenged by the fact that another form of specific recognition mechanisms already existed in prokaryotes that may be able to specifically auto-protect against external danger. This recognition mechanism can be considered a primitive form of specific (adaptive) non-self recognition. It is based on the fact that many archaea and bacteria use a genome editing system that confers the ability to appropriate viral DNA sequences allowing prokaryotes to prevent host damage through a mechanism very similar to adaptive immunity. This is indistinctly called, 'endogenization of foreign DNA' or 'viral DNA predation' or, more pictorially 'DNA cannibalism'. For several years evidence has been accumulating, highlighting the crucial role of endogenization of foreign DNA in the fundamental processes related to adaptive immunity and leading to a change in the dogma that adaptive immunity appeared late in speciation.

COVID-19 Pandemic: Escape of Pathogenic Variants and MHC Evolution

We propose a new hypothesis that explains the maintenance and evolution of MHC polymorphism. It is based on two phenomena: the constitution of the repertoire of naive T lymphocytes and the evolution of the pathogen and its impact on the immune memory of T lymphocytes. Concerning the latter, pathogen evolution will have a different impact on reinfection depending on the MHC allomorph. If a mutation occurs in a given region, in the case of MHC allotypes, which do not recognize the peptide in this region, the mutation will have no impact on the memory repertoire. In the case where the MHC allomorph binds to the ancestral peptides and not to the mutated peptide, that individual will have a higher chance of being reinfected. This difference in fitness will lead to a variation of the allele frequency in the next generation. Data from the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic already support a significant part of this hypothesis and following up on these data may enable it to be confirmed. This hypothesis could explain why some individuals after vaccination respond less well than others to variants and leads to predict the probability of reinfection after a first infection depending upon the variant and the HLA allomorph.