(Single-stranded DNA) gaps in understanding BRCAness

Immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography: waltz of metal ions and biomacromolecules

INTRODUCTION

Immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography (IMAC) is an effective method developed in the 1980s for the separation and purification of proteins. The system consists of a solid-phase matrix, a linking ligand, and a metal ion. The method is based on the ability of metal ions to bind specifically to certain specific amino acid residues of proteins, thereby selectively enriching and purifying proteins.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to describe current knowledge of fundamental principle of IMAC and summarize the supports, chelating ligands, and metal ions of IMAC. In addition, how IMAC technology is used in proteomics and DNA research are highlighted.

EXPERT OPINION

Over the past decades, IMAC has been extensively utilized as a predominant technique for protein enrichment in a variety of biological and medical research, such as disease diagnosis, tumor biomarker identification, protein purification, and nucleic acid research. In the future, IMAC should be integrated with other proteomics technologies to promote the applications of metalloproteomes in disease diagnosis, metallodrug development and clinical translation.

PARG inhibitor sensitivity correlates with accumulation of single-stranded DNA gaps in preclinical models of ovarian cancer

Poly (ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) is a dePARylating enzyme which promotes DNA repair by removal of poly (ADP-ribose) (PAR) from PARylated proteins. Loss or inhibition of PARG results in replication stress and sensitizes cancer cells to DNA-damaging agents. PARG inhibitors are now undergoing clinical development for patients having tumors with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), such as cancer patients with germline or somatic BRCA1/2-mutations. PARP inhibitors kill BRCA-deficient cancer cells by increasing single-stranded DNA gaps (ssGAPs) during replication. Here, we report that, like PARP inhibitor (PARPi), PARG inhibitor (PARGi) treatment also causes an accumulation of ssGAPs in sensitive cells. PARGi exposure increased accumulation of S-phase-specific PAR, a marker for Okazaki fragment processing (OFP) defects on lagging strands and induced ssGAPs, in sensitive cells but not in resistant cells. PARGi also caused accumulation of PAR at the replication forks and at the ssDNA sites in sensitive cells. Additionally, PARGi exhibited monotherapy activity in specific HR-deficient, as well as HR-proficient, patient-derived, or patient-derived xenograft (PDX)-derived organoids of ovarian cancer, and drug sensitivity directly correlated with the accumulation of ssGAPs. Taken together, PARGi treatment results in toxic accumulation of PAR at replication forks resulting in ssGAPs due to OFP defects during replication. Regardless of the BRCA/HRD-status, the induction of ssGAPs in preclinical models of ovarian cancer cells correlates with PARGi sensitivity. Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) may be a useful model system for testing PARGi sensitivity and functional biomarkers.

Positioning loss of PARP1 activity as the central toxic event in BRCA-deficient cancer

The mechanisms by which poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) inhibitors (PARPi)s inflict replication stress and/or DNA damage are potentially numerous. PARPi toxicity could derive from loss of its catalytic activity and/or its physical trapping of PARP1 onto DNA that perturbs not only PARP1 function in DNA repair and DNA replication, but also obstructs compensating pathways. The combined disruption of PARP1 with either of the hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genes, BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA), results in synthetic lethality. This has driven the development of PARP inhibitors as therapies for BRCA-mutant cancers. In this review, we focus on recent findings that highlight loss of PARP1 catalytic activity, rather than PARPi-induced allosteric trapping, as central to PARPi efficacy in BRCA deficient cells. However, we also review findings that PARP-trapping is an effective strategy in other genetic deficiencies. Together, we conclude that the mechanism-of-action of PARP inhibitors is not unilateral; with loss of activity or enhanced trapping differentially killing depending on the genetic context. Therefore, effectively targeting cancer cells requires an intricate understanding of their key underlying vulnerabilities.

Tolerating DNA damage by repriming: Gap filling in the spotlight

Timely and accurate DNA replication is critical for safeguarding genome integrity and ensuring cell viability. Yet, this process is challenged by DNA damage blocking the progression of the replication machinery. To counteract replication fork stalling, evolutionary conserved DNA damage tolerance (DDT) mechanisms promote DNA damage bypass and fork movement. One of these mechanisms involves "skipping" DNA damage through repriming downstream of the lesion, leaving single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) gaps behind the advancing forks (also known as post-replicative gaps). In vertebrates, repriming in damaged leading templates is proposed to be mainly promoted by the primase and polymerase PRIMPOL. In this review, we discuss recent advances towards our understanding of the physiological and pathological conditions leading to repriming activation in human models, revealing a regulatory network of PRIMPOL activity. Upon repriming by PRIMPOL, post-replicative gaps formed can be filled-in by the DDT mechanisms translesion synthesis and template switching. We discuss novel findings on how these mechanisms are regulated and coordinated in time to promote gap filling. Finally, we discuss how defective gap filling and aberrant gap expansion by nucleases underlie the cytotoxicity associated with post-replicative gap accumulation. Our increasing knowledge of this repriming mechanism - from gap formation to gap filling - is revealing that targeting the last step of this pathway is a promising approach to exploit post-replicative gaps in anti-cancer therapeutic strategies.