Prerequisites of language acquisition in the newborn brain

Establishing neural representations for new word forms in 12-month-old infants

During the first year of life, infants start to learn the lexicon of their native language. Word learning includes the establishment of longer-term representations for the phonological form and the meaning of the word in the brain, as well as the link between them. However, it is not known how the brain processes word forms immediately after they have been learned. We familiarized 12-month-old infants (N = 52) with two pseudowords and studied their neural signatures. Specifically, we determined whether a newly learned word form elicits neural signatures similar to those observed when a known word is recognized (i.e., when a well-established word representation is activated, eliciting enhanced mismatch responses) or whether the processing of a newly learned word form shows the suppression of the neural response along with the principles of predictive coding of a learned rule (i.e., the order of the syllables of the new word form). The pattern of results obtained in the current study suggests that recognized word forms elicit a mismatch response of negative polarity, similar to newly learned and previously known words with an established representation in long-term memory. In contrast, prediction errors caused by acoustic novelty or deviation from the expected order in a sequence of (pseudo)words elicit responses of positive polarity. This suggests that electric brain activity is not fully explained by the predictive coding framework.

Infant neural speech encoding is associated with pre-reading skill development

OBJECTIVE

We longitudinally investigated whether infant P1 and N2 ERPs recorded in newborns and at 28 months could predict pre-reading skills at 28 months and 4-5 years.

METHODS

We recorded ERPs to a pseudoword in newborns and at 28 months in a sample over-represented by infants with familial dyslexia risk. Using multiple linear regression models, we examined P1 and N2 associations with pre-reading skills at 28 months and 4-5 years.

RESULTS

Shorter latencies of the newborn P1 predicted faster serial naming at 28 months. Larger amplitudes and shorter latencies of P1 at 28 months predicted better serial naming abilities and auditory working memory across the pre-reading stage. Right-lateralized P1 and N2 were related to poorer pre-reading skills.

CONCLUSIONS

Infant ERPs, particularly P1, providing information about neural speech encoding abilities, are associated with pre-reading skill development.

SIGNIFICANCE

Infant and early childhood neural speech encoding abilities may work as early predictive markers of reading development and impairment. This study may help to plan early interventions targeting phonological processing to prevent or ameliorate learning deficits.

Meaning as mentalization

The way we establish meaning has been a profound question not only in language research but in developmental science as well. The relation between linguistic form and content has been loosened up in recent pragmatic approaches to communication, showing that code-based models of language comprehension must be augmented by context-sensitive, pragmatic-inferential mechanisms to recover the speaker's intended meaning. Language acquisition has traditionally been thought to involve building a mental lexicon and extracting syntactic rules from noisy linguistic input, while communicative-pragmatic inferences have also been argued to be indispensable. Recent research findings exploring the electrophysiological indicator of semantic processing, the N400, have raised serious questions about the traditional separation between semantic decoding and pragmatic inferential processes. The N400 appears to be sensitive to mentalization-the ability to attribute beliefs to social partners-already from its developmental onset. This finding raises the possibility that mentalization may not simply contribute to pragmatic inferences that enrich linguistic decoding processes but that the semantic system may be functioning in a fundamentally mentalistic manner. The present review first summarizes the key contributions of pragmatic models of communication to language comprehension. Then, it provides an overview of how communicative intentions are interpreted in developmental theories of communication, with a special emphasis on mentalization. Next, it discusses the sensitivity of infants to the information-transmitting potential of language, their ability to pick up its code-like features, and their capacity to track language comprehension of social partners using mentalization. In conclusion, I argue that the recovery of meaning during linguistic communication is not adequately modeled as a process of code-based semantic retrieval complemented by pragmatic inferences. Instead, the semantic system may establish meaning, as intended, during language comprehension and acquisition through mentalistic attribution of content to communicative partners.