Acute abdomen in early pregnancy due to ovarian torsion following successful in vitro fertilization treatment

Acute Abdomen in Pregnancy: A Comprehensive Review of Diagnosis and Management

An unusual diagnostic and treatment challenge is presented by an acute abdomen during pregnancy. Obstetric factors and other causes unrelated to pregnancy also contribute to acute abdominal discomfort in pregnancy. Due to the changing clinical presentations brought on by the anatomical and physiological changes of pregnancy as well as the hesitation to utilize certain radiological studies out of concern about damaging the fetus, the diagnosis of the acute abdomen during pregnancy can be challenging. Delays in identification and treatment may have negative effects on the mother as well as the fetus. This review sheds light on the importance of anatomical and physiological considerations, early diagnoses, and understanding the various modalities and etiologies of acute abdomen in pregnancy (AAP). We then move on to discuss the various diagnostic techniques that can help the physician determine the causes and plan well-informed treatment. We examine and contrast different radiographic tests, including X-rays, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound. We also talk about the various roles that these investigational methods can play in the evaluation and treatment throughout the duration of the pregnancy. The paper additionally addresses how to handle patients who appear with AAP and the different techniques used to treat them, including pre-operative laparoscopy. Before going over some more broad points that might be useful, we eventually dive into some of the more intriguing etiologies relating to AAP, such as isolated tubal torsion and neoplastic complications.

Adnexal torsion in pregnancy: A systematic review of case reports and case series

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate clinical presentations, surgical procedures and findings, complications, and predisposing factors of adnexal torsion in pregnant women.

METHODS

We searched PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science from January 2000 to March 2022. All case reports and case series with full-text English language reporting adnexal torsion in pregnant women were included. Medical history, clinical presentations, surgical procedures and findings, complications related to adnexal torsion, and predisposing factors were independently extracted by two investigators.

RESULTS

A total of 182 articles reporting 662 pregnant women with adnexal torsion were included. Most of the adnexal torsions occurred during the first trimester (54.63%), while others occurred during the second (26.36%) and third (19.00%) trimesters. The most common symptom of adnexal torsion was sudden-onset pain (80.60%). Enlargement of the adnexa was the most prevalent ultrasound finding in a twisted adnexa (95.20%). Additionally, about half of the patients had decreased blood flow in Doppler ultrasound (53.80%). Laparoscopic surgery was the favorite option (56.88%), while cystectomy and detorsion were the most commonly performed procedure (29.06%). Expectant management was reported in only 2.99% of the patients. In addition, the most common complications were preterm labor (27.58%) and emergent cesarean sections (25.28%).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should think of adnexal torsion when pregnant women complain of sudden-onset pain. Then, using ultrasound, adnexal enlargement or masses should be explored seriously. They should take invasive and urgent therapy to preserve ovaries and prevent complications.

Case Report: Ovarian Torsion Prior to Oocyte Trigger in a Woman Undergoing In Vitro Fertilisation

Background: Ovarian torsion accounts for 2.7% of the surgical emergencies in women 1 yet remains a morbid and frequently misdiagnosed condition 2 .

Aim: Here we describe a case of ovarian torsion prior to administration of the trigger in a 35-year-old multigravida undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation on a background of bilateral salpingectomy, along with the outcome of post detorsion oocyte pick up.

Result: An antagonist protocol was used with a follicular count on day 12 confirming eight follicles in each of the right and left ovaries. The day prior to the planned GnRH agonist trigger, she developed a sudden onset of severe abdominal pain associated with vomiting. Urgent laparoscopy demonstrated a 720-degree torsion of the right ovary, which was detorted without complication. The patient was discharged home on the same day, a trigger was administered, and oocyte retrieval completed as per schedule. Post torsion 11 oocytes were collected, four from the left and seven from the right, a final embryo cryopreservation rate of 57% from the affected right ovary compared with 50% from the left ovary was achieved.

Conclusion: In vitro fertilisation is a recognised risk factor for ovarian torsion 2 . Here we report the first case of a torsion in a woman prior to the administration of a trigger, who successfully underwent detorsion with salvage of oocytes collection and embryo cryopreservation.

Adnexal torsion in pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: Case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Torsion is the most common gynecologic emergency of the adnexal mass occurring during pregnancy. We report the clinical data of a case of twin pregnancy with adnexal torsion after in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer, in which the patient underwent surgery for adnexal detorsion and experienced preterm delivery. One child died as a neonate, and the other child was diagnosed with hematological disease, which, to our knowledge, has not been reported previously. We also performed a systematic literature review to increase knowledge of the need for prompt surgical intervention.

PATIENT CONCERNS

The patient was a 32-year-old pregnant woman, who presented to our center with acute onset of stabbing and non-radiating continuous lower left abdominal pain after urination, of 6 hours duration.

DIAGNOSIS

Physical examination revealed that the lower abdominal tenderness was worse on the left side, and there were no signs of peritonitis. Transvaginal ultrasonographic examination indicated a multiloculated left ovary measuring 12.1 × 7.1 cm with sparse blood flow. The size of the largest cyst was 7.2 × 6.6 cm, the right ovary appeared normal, and two live fetuses were seen.

INTERVENTIONS

laparoscopy was performed 1.5 hours later, which revealed a cystic and multilocular left ovary with a black purplish surface and thin wall. The left ovary and left fallopian tube had undergone 720° torsion (3 rotations), and detorsion was performed laparoscopy.

OUTCOMES

The left adnexa recovered to near normal appearance 20 minutes postoperatively. The patient was discharged from hospital 5 days postsurgery, without complications. Unfortunately, the patient delivered two preterm babies at 30 weeks of gestation.

CONCLUSIONS

We should be alert to the possible risk of adnexal torsion in pregnant women after IVF. Adnexal torsion necessitates prompt surgical intervention, detorsion and preserving ovarian function are the main treatment methods. Furthermore, the possibility of recurrence, and pregnancy outcomes for the patient, as well as newborn health, should be considered.

COVID-19 pandemic's effects on the quality of pregnant women's emergency treatment: Review of two cases from a medical center in northern Taiwan

The spread of COVID-19 has resulted in a high risk of infection in hospitals worldwide. The medical staff in emergency rooms, in particular, have borne the brunt of the pandemic, and strict protection measures are needed to avoid infection in these units. Taiwan as a whole has performed extremely well in this epidemic, an achievement that has been acknowledged internationally. This success can be attributed to the Taiwan Epidemic Prevention Management Center's extensive experience and courageous strategy. The emergency department professionals of all hospitals, in conjunction with the outstanding performance of the center's policy, have also done much to control the infection's spread. However, excessive protection can also negatively affect patients' safety and the quality of medical care, especially for pregnant and parturient women. This article uses two actual cases from a medical center in northern Taiwan to discuss the impact of COVID-19 on pregnant women. This case study serves to highlight that, to ensure more effective coordination during severe epidemics, a comprehensive infection prevention plan should be formulated. In addition, pregnant women's human rights must be safeguarded so that various protective mechanisms can be effectively used to achieve win-win solutions. Hospitals need to plan their production methods and timing in advance for when pregnant patients are in critical condition. The findings include that obstetricians recommend caesarean sections as a safer method in during epidemics. Emergency room physicians and obstetricians should also actively assist mothers prepare for birth to enhance maternal and fetal safety.

Obstetrical outcomes following laparoscopy during pregnancy: a retrospective case-control study

PURPOSE

To evaluate pregnancy outcome of patients who undergo laparoscopy during pregnancy.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study, conducted in a single university-affiliated tertiary care medical center, comparing pregnancy outcomes of women who underwent laparoscopy during pregnancy to women without operations during pregnancy. The study group (n = 232) included all pregnant women who underwent a single laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy (4-28 weeks of gestation) which culminated in delivery between 2006 and 2017; this study group was matched to a control group (n = 463) without surgical intervention during pregnancy, in a 2:1 ratio by maternal age, parity, and multiple gestation.

RESULTS

The main pregnancy outcomes included preterm birth, cesarean section, small for gestational age (≤ 10 percentile), and Apgar score of less than 7 in 5 min. Laparoscopy during pregnancy was associated with an increased risk for cesarean section (32.3% vs. 24.6%, adjusted OR = 1.9, CI 1.2-3.1, p = 0.011). We found no difference between the groups with regard to other outcomes, including rates of preterm birth (12.1% vs. 10.4%, adjusted OR = 1.3, CI 0.64-2.72, p = 0.451). In a subgroup analysis of the study group, various perioperative parameters such as operation duration, hospitalization length, and others, did not correlate with adverse pregnancy outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy during pregnancy may be associated with an increased rate of cesarean section. We did not find an increase in any other pregnancy or neonatal complication. Different perioperative parameters did not appear to predict adverse pregnancy outcome.

Comparison of ovarian torsion between pregnant and non-pregnant women at reproductive ages: sonographic and pathological findings

Background

Differences in the ultrasonographic features and histological diagnosis of ovarian torsion in pregnant and non-pregnant women have not been defined. A better characterization of these features may help improve the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis. The present study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics, sonographic findings, operative procedures, and histological spectrum of ovarian torsion in pregnant and non-pregnant women.

Methods

This was a retrospective investigation of female patients at reproductive age with ovarian torsion between January 2010 and May 2017. Each patient received a detailed preoperative ultrasound, and the diagnosis was confirmed by surgery. The clinical characteristics, ultrasonic features, operative procedures, and histological diagnosis of ovarian torsion were retrieved from medical records and were compared in non-pregnant and pregnant patients according to the method of conception.

Results

The overall preoperative ultrasonic detection rate of ovarian torsion was 0.84, which was significantly different between pregnant and non-pregnant women. The presence of ovarian edema and abnormal adnexal positions also differed between pregnant and non-pregnant women. The ultrasonic features were not significantly different between the two pregnant sub-groups. The most common histologic diagnoses in the pregnant group and the non-pregnant group were a normal ovary and teratoma, respectively. The incidence of ovarian neoplasm was significantly lower in pregnant women. There were significant differences in the surgical procedures between the groups based on neoplastic or non-neoplastic lesions.

Conclusions

Ovarian edema, absence/decreased blood flow in the ovary, and the whirlpool sign were reliable ultrasonic markers for ovarian torsion at reproductive ages. The preoperative ultrasonic detection rate of ovarian torsion was higher in pregnant women, and ovarian edema was more common. The clinical features of ovarian torsion in pregnant women were similar, independent of the method of conception. In women with ovarian torsion, the incidence of non-neoplastic lesions was more frequent in pregnant women, whereas neoplastic lesions were more common in non-pregnant women. Ultrasonography provides useful parameters for the preclinical diagnosis of ovarian torsion to improve patient management.

Emergent complication of assisted reproductive technology: Clinical analysis of 17 pregnant women with adnexal torsion

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical symptoms, surgical management, and outcomes of pregnant women with adnexal torsion due to assisted reproductive technology.

METHODS

It was a retrospective study that include 17 pregnant women with adnexal torsion, in which the maternal age, type of fertilization, gestational age, clinical symptoms, ultrasonic findings, side affected by the disease, surgical method, and pregnancy outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 17 patients with adnexal torsion were included in this study, of which 8 patients conceived by in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET), 1 by artificial insemination (AIH), and the other 8 conceived naturally after ovulation induction. About 14 were reported to have occurred in the first trimester of pregnancy, 1 case in the second trimester, and the other 2 in the third trimester. Clinical symptoms were abdominal pain with or without nausea and vomiting. 14 cases occurred in the right adnexa and the other 3 in the left. 5 of the patients underwent laparoscopy, and the other 12 underwent laparotomy. 8 cases were of full- term delivery, 6 twins gave birth prematurely, and 3 patients had inevitable abortion.

CONCLUSIONS

Adnexal torsion is an acute onset of lower abdominal pain in women, which seldom occurs during pregnancy. However, because of the wide application of assisted reproductive technology (ART), its incidence has increased. Early diagnosis and treatment can lead to better results.

Magnetic resonance imaging findings in ovarian torsion post in vitro fertilization

Patients who get pregnant after being treated with in vitro fertilization (IVF) are at significantly increased risk of ovarian torsion compared to the general population and also in comparison to patients who get pregnant normally [1,2]. The risk is further increased in patients who develop ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome [1]. This possibility should be considered in this group of patients presenting with acute abdominal pain and immediate management should be commenced. Here, we report 2 patients who received treatment for infertility with IVF and developed ovarian torsion and we discuss their management including the imaging workup. The first case is a 34-year-old woman at 11 + 3 weeks of gestation after IVF who presented with a 12-hour acute right lower abdominal pain with nausea and vomiting. She underwent an ultrasound examination and then further evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging which showed asymmetric enlargement of the right ovary and stromal edema and a diagnosis of ovarian torsion was made. The patient underwent laparoscopic detortion and the ovary was salvaged. The second case is a 33-year-old woman at 9 weeks of gestation after IVF who presented with intermittent abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding, and nausea and vomiting for 5 days but became worse on the fifth day. Ultrasound and subsequently magnetic resonance imaging were performed which confirmed hyperstimulation syndrome. Abnormal location of the left ovary anterior to the uterus with higher volume as well as the clinical progression raised the possibility of ovarian torsion and prompted a diagnostic laparoscopy which showed right ovarian torsion and detortion was performed.

Ovarian Torsion in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy Leading to Iatrogenic Preterm Delivery

Ovarian torsion in the third trimester of pregnancy leading to a midline laparotomy and caesarean section for the delivery of a preterm baby is an uncommon event. As the woman is likely to present with nonspecific symptoms of lower abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting, ovarian torsion can often be misdiagnosed as appendicitis or preterm labour. Treatment and the opportunity to preserve the tube and ovary may consequently be delayed. We report the case of a multiparous woman who had undergone two previous caesarean sections at term, presenting at 35 weeks of gestation with a presumptive diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ultrasonography described a cystic lesion 6 × 3 cm in the right adnexa, potentially a degenerating fibroid or a torted right ovary. MRI of the pelvis was unable to provide further clarity. The patient was managed by midline laparotomy and simultaneous detorsion of the ovarian pedicle and ovarian cystectomy together with caesarean section of a preterm infant. This report describes that prompt recognition and ensuring intraoperative access can achieve a successful maternal and fetal outcome in this rare and difficult scenario. Furthermore, we would like to emphasise that the risk for a pregnant woman and her newborn could be reduced by earlier diagnosis and management of ovarian masses (Krishnan et al., 2011).