The value of hysteroscopic management of cesarean scar pregnancy: a report of 44 cases

Treatments for cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To report the outcome of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) undergoing treatment.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were women with CSP undergoing treatment. The primary outcome was successful treatment for CSP, defined as no need for additional medical or surgical strategies. Secondary outcomes were the type of additional treatment (surgical or medical), need for blood transfusion, emergency laparotomy, hysterectomy, post-treatment complications.All these outcomes were explored in women undergoing single and compound treatments for CSP. Furthermore, we performed a separate sub-group analysis only including studies which reported on the outcomes of elective treatments. Random effects meta-analyses were used to analyze the data and results reported as pooled proportions or odd ratio (OR).

RESULTS

176 studies (13431 women with CSP undergoing treatment) were included.Successful treatment after primary intervention was achieved in 86.2% (95% CI 82.3-89.7) of women with CSP undergoing treatment with ultrasound guided suction curettage, 72.4% (95% CI 64.8-79.3) with systemic MTX, 81.6% (95% CI 72.3-89.3) with local MTX, 83.9% (95% CI 66.7-95.6) with interventional radiology, 90.42% (95% CI 82.9-96.0) with hysteroscopy, 96.1% (95% CI (92.3-98.6) with laparoscopy and 92.6 with high intensity focused ultrasound (95% CI 78.2-99.6). Post-treatments complications were reported in 3.5% (95% CI 1.7-6.0) of women treated with systemic MTX, 5.9% (95% CI 0.8-15.1) with local MTX or KCl, 1.2% (95% CI 0.1-3.5) with interventional radiology, 1.4% (95% CI 0.4-2.9) with hysteroscopy, 5.5% (95% CI 0.4-25.7) with high intensity focused ultrasound and in none of the cases treated with ultrasound guided suction curettage.When considering compound treatments, successful resolution of CSP was achieved in 91.9% (95% CI 88.0-95.10) of women treated with interventional radiology followed by curettage, 83.3% (95% CI 68.8-93.8) with systemic MTX and curettage, 79.4% (95% CI 56.3-95.2) with local MTX and curettage, 96.2% (95% CI 92.3-98.7) with curettage followed by single or double balloon insertion in the uterine cavity, 98.3% (95% CI 95.9-99.7) with high intensity focused ultrasound followed by curettage, 91.1% (95% CI 3.4-97.0) with interventional radiology followed by removal of CSP with hysteroscopy, 64.3% (95% CI 13.8-99.2) with interventional radiology and systemic MTX and in 95.5% (95% CI 92.9-97.5) with curettage and hysteroscopy.When considering studies reporting a comparison between different treatments, there was no difference between systemic vs local MTX in the primary outcome. Curettage was associated with a higher chance of achieving a successful treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

A multitude of treatments for CSP have been reported in the published literature. All treatments described for CSP are apparently equally effective in treating this condition. The findings from this systematic review highlight the need for adopting a common definition and outcome reporting of CSP to better elucidate its natural history, estimate the magnitude of maternal complication after treatment and design appropriately powered RCT to elucidate the optimal treatment of CSP according to its ultrasound phenotype and gestational age at treatment, in terms of effective resolution of the condition and risk of post-intervention complications.

The effectiveness of hysteroscopy for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a long-term complication of cesarean section characterized by the localization of a subsequent gestational sac within the scar area or niche developed as a result of a previous cesarean section. Its incidence has increased substantially because of the high global cesarean section rate in recent decades. Several surgical and drug treatments exist for this condition; however, there is currently no optimal treatment. This study compared the effectiveness of direct hysteroscopic removal of the gestational tissue and hysteroscopy combined with vacuum suction for the treatment of CSP.

METHODS

From 2017 to 2023, 521 patients were diagnosed with CSP at our hospital. Of these patients, 45 underwent hysteroscopy. Among them, 28 underwent direct hysteroscopic removal (hysteroscopic removal group) and 17 underwent hysteroscopy combined with vacuum suction (hysteroscopic suction group). The clinical characteristics and outcomes of the hysteroscopic removal group and hysteroscopic suction group were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 45 patients, the amount of bleeding and hospitalization cost were significantly higher in the hysteroscopic removal group than in the hysteroscopic suction group (33.8 mL vs. 9.9 mL, P < 0.001; and 8744.0 yuan vs. 5473.8 yuan, P < 0.001; respectively). The operation time and duration of hospitalization were significantly longer in the hysteroscopic removal group than in the hysteroscopic suction group (61.4 min vs. 28.2 min, P < 0.001; and 3.8 days vs. 2.4 days, P = 0.026; respectively). Three patients in the hysteroscopic removal group had uterine perforation and received laparoscopic repair during operation. No complications occurred in the hysteroscopic suction group. One patient in the hysteroscopic removal group received ultrasound-guided suction curettage due to postoperative moderate vaginal bleeding, and one patient in the hysteroscopic suction group received ultrasound-guided suction curettage due to postoperative gestational residue and elevated serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin levels. Reproductive function was preserved in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Hysteroscopy is an effective method for treating CSP. Compared with direct hysteroscopic removal, hysteroscopy combined with vacuum suction is more suitable for CSP. However, multicenter prospective studies with large sample sizes are required for verification of these findings.

Clinical efficacy and risk factors for suction curettage and hysteroscopy in patients with type I and II cesarean scar pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical efficacy and evaluate risk factors for suction curettage (SC) and hysteroscopy in the treatment of type I and II cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study including 100 women diagnosed with type I/II CSP. Patients were treated with either ultrasound-guided SC (SC group) or hysteroscopy resection (surgery group). The success rates, mean operation time, hospitalization duration, hospitalization cost, risk factors, adverse events, and complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

The success rate of the SC and surgery groups were 85% and 100%, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.032). There was one case of type I CSP and eight cases of type II CSP that failed SC treatment. No failed cases were found in the surgery group. Analysis of the causes of treatment failure revealed that diameter of the gestational sac was a risk factor for SC failure (odds ratio, 19.66 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.70-227.72], P = 0.017). Comparing the clinical outcomes between the SC and surgery groups, although the mean operation time of the SC group was significantly shorter than the surgery group (15 [CI, 15-20] vs. 30 [CI, 27-40], P = 0.001), the cost and duration of hospitalization were significantly lower in the surgery group than that in the SC group. No significant differences were observed for adverse events and complications between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Hysteroscopy is an effective and economical method for treating type I/II CSP. Moreover, SC is not recommended for patients with type I/II CSP with a gestation age ≥8 weeks.

Efficacy, Safety and Outcomes of the Laparoscopic Management of Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy as a Single Therapeutic Approach: A Case Series

A standardized consensus for the management of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is lacking. The study objective is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and outcomes of the laparoscopic management of CSP as a single therapeutic surgical approach without being preceded by vascular pretreatment or vasoconstrictors injection. This is a retrospective bi-centric study, a case series. Eight patients with a future desire to conceive underwent the laparoscopic treatment of unruptured CSPs. Surgery consisted of "en bloc" excision of the deficient uterine scar with the adherent tissue of conception, followed by immediate uterine repair. The data collected for each patient was age, gestity, parity, number of previous c-sections, pre-pregnancy isthmocele-related symptoms, gestational age, fetal cardiac activity, initial β-human chorionic gonadotropin levels, intra-operative blood loss, blood transfusion, operative time and the postoperative complications, evaluated according to Clavien-Dindo classification. The CSP was successfully removed in all patients by laparoscopy. The surgical outcomes were favorable. All patients with histories of isthmocele-related symptoms reported postoperative resolution of symptoms. The median residual myometrium thickness increased significantly from 1.2 mm pre-operatively to 8 mm 3 to 6 months after surgery. The laparoscopic management seems to be an appropriate treatment of CSP when performed by skilled laparoscopic surgeons. It can be safely proposed as a single surgical therapeutic approach. Larger series and further prospective studies are needed to confirm this observation and to affirm the long-term gynecological and obstetrical outcomes of this management.

Hysteroscopic resection vs ultrasound-guided dilation and evacuation for treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy is a type of ectopic pregnancy in which the fertilized egg is implanted in the muscle or fibrous tissue of the scar after a previous cesarean delivery. The condition can be catastrophic if not managed on time and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Several approaches have been studied for the management of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy in women who opted for termination of pregnancy with no consensus on the best treatment modality reached so far.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the success rate of hysteroscopic resection vs ultrasound-guided dilation and evacuation for the treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a parallel group, nonblinded, randomized clinical trial conducted at a single center in Italy. Women with singleton gestations at <8 weeks and 6 days of gestation were included in the study. Inclusion criteria were women with a cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy with positive embryonic heart activity who opted for termination of pregnancy. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either hysteroscopic resection (ie, intervention group) or ultrasound-guided dilation and evacuation (ie, control group). Both groups received 50 mg/m2 of methotrexate intramuscularly at the time of randomization (day 1) and another dose at day 3. A third dose of methotrexate was planned in case of persistence of positive fetal heart activity at day 5. Participants received either ultrasound-guided dilation and evacuation or hysteroscopic resection from 1 to 5 days after the last dose of methotrexate. Hysteroscopic resection was performed under spinal anesthesia using a 15 Fr bipolar mini-resectoscope. Dilation and evacuation were performed by vacuum aspiration with a Karman cannula, followed by sharp curettage, if necessary, under ultrasound guidance. The primary outcome was the success rate of the treatment protocol, defined as no further treatment required until the complete resolution of the cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Resolution of the cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy was evaluated based on decline of beta-hCG and the absence of residual gestational material in the endometrial cavity. Treatment failure was defined as the necessity for further treatment required until the complete resolution of the cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. A sample size calculation indicated that 54 participants were required to test the hypothesis RESULTS: A total of 54 women were enrolled and randomized. Number of previous cesarean deliveries ranged from 1 to 3. Overall, 10 women received a third dose of methotrexate with 7 of 27 (25.9%) participants in the hysteroscopic resection group and 3 of 27 (11.1%) in the dilation and evacuation group. The success rate was 100% (27/27) in the hysteroscopic resection group and 81.5% (22/27) in the dilation and evacuation group (relative risk, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.48). Additional procedures were required in 5 cases of the control group, namely 3 hysterectomies, 1 laparotomic uterine segmental resection, and 1 hysteroscopic resection. The length of stay in the hospital was 9.0±2.9 days in the intervention group and 10.0±3.5 days in the control group (mean difference, -1.00 days; 95% confidence interval, -2.71 to 0.71). No cases of admission to intensive care unit or maternal death were reported.

CONCLUSION

Hysteroscopic resection was associated with an increased success rate in the treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy when compared with ultrasound-guided dilation and evacuation.

Risk factors associated with the failure of initial treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To explore the factors related to cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) treatment failure under different treatment strategies.

METHODS

This is a cohort study that consecutively included 1637 patients with CSP. Characteristics including age, gravidity, parity, previous uterine curettages, time since the last cesarean section, gestational age, mean sac diameter, initial serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin, distance between gestational sac and serosal layer, CSP subtype, classification of blood flow abundance, fetal heartbeat presence, and intraoperative bleeding were recorded. Four strategies were performed separately on these patients. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors for initial treatment failure (ITF) under the different treatment strategies.

RESULTS

The treatment methods failed in 75 CSP patients, and succeeded in 1298 patients. The analysis found that the presence of a fetal heartbeat was significantly associated with ITF of strategy 1, 2 and 4 (P < 0.05); sac diameter was associated with ITF of strategy 1 and 2 (P < 0.05); gestational age was associated with initial treatment failure of strategy 2 (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

There was no difference of the failure rate between ultrasound-guided evacuation and hysteroscopy-guided evacuation for CSP treatment with or without uterine artery embolization pretreatment. Sac diameter, fetal heartbeat presence, and gestational age were all associated with CSP initial treatment failure.

Other treatments for CSP

Caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is an increasingly common clinical conundrum. The non-curettage surgical management of CSP can be categorised into hysteroscopic, vaginal, laparoscopic, and open removal modalities and the choice of treatment is surgeon-dependent. A systematic review of original studies reporting surgical treatment outcomes of CSP until March 2023 was conducted to evaluate the non-curettage surgical management of this highly morbid condition. A total of 60 studies of mostly weak methodological quality were identified involving 6720 CSP cases. Success rates were generally high across all treatment modalities although highest in vaginal and laparoscopic excisional approaches. Morbidity was most associated with haemorrhage although unplanned hysterectomy rates remained low across all treatment groups. Subsequent pregnancies are associated with morbidity despite being underreported and the impact of CSP treatment on future pregnancy is poorly understood. Substantive study heterogeneity precludes meta-analyses of pooled data and treatment superiority has not been demonstrated.

“In Situ” Methotrexate Injection Followed by Hysteroscopic Resection for Caesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Single-Center Experience

Background: We evaluated the efficacy of local methotrexate (MTX) treatment followed by hysteroscopic resection for caesarean scar pregnancy and its impact on future fertility. Methods: Monocentric, prospective, observational study performed in the Haykel Hospital between June 2016 and December 2020. Twenty-one women with caesarean scar pregnancy underwent a transcutaneous ultrasound-guided direct injection of MTX into the gestational sac in an outpatient setting. Hysteroscopic resection of residual trophoblastic retention was then performed according to perisaccular blood flow. Main results: Two patients had complete spontaneous trophoblast expulsion after MTX injection, and hysteroscopy was performed in 19 patients for residual trophoblastic retention 1 to 12 weeks after MTX injection. Successful preservation of a healthy uterus with the combined procedure was obtained in 94.8% of patients. Hemostatic hysterectomy was required in one patient. Mean hospitalization duration was 1.5 days. Three patients had spontaneous pregnancy after the procedure. Conclusion: Direct MTX injection into the gestational sac for caesarean scar pregnancy followed by hysteroscopic resection was an effective technique with a short hospitalization, fertility preservation and a low major complication rate compared with other modalities of treatment reported in the literature. Further larger prospective comparative studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of this procedure.

Efficacy of suction curettage as the first-line treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

There is still no consensus on a safe and efficient treatment modality for cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP), which is known to cause severe complications, such as life-threatening hemorrhage. Suction curettage (SC) has been used as the first-line treatment for CSP with controversial outcomes. In this context, the objective of this study is to analyze the efficacy of SC in the treatment of CSP.

METHODS

The sample of this retrospective study consisted of 64 CSP patients treated using SC between 2012 and 2022. Patients' demographic and clinical variables, including the thickness of the myometrium at the lower uterine segment between the urinary bladder and cesarean scar, were obtained from their medical records. The study's primary outcome was determined as the success rate of SC. Accordingly, the patients were categorized into two groups: successful SC (Group 1) and unsuccessful SC (Group 2).

RESULTS

The success rate of SC was determined as 78.1%. The number of previous cesarean deliveries, gestational age, baseline beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) values, and endometrial thickness was significantly higher in Group 2 (p<0.05 for all), whereas the fetal cardiac activity and absence of an embryonic pole were significantly higher in Group 2 (p = 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). There was no significant difference between the groups in the thickness of the myometrium at the lower uterine segment (p = 0.890). The hemoglobin levels decreased significantly after SC in both Groups 1 and 2 (p<0.001 and p = 0.009, respectively). There was no significant difference between the groups in preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin values and the decrease in hemoglobin levels (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The study findings did not indicate any significant correlation between myometrial thickness at the lower uterine segment and the efficacy of SC in CSP patients. On the other hand, the number of cesarean deliveries, gestational age, baseline β-hCG values, endometrium thickness, fetal cardiac activity, and embryonic pole may be used to predict the outcome of SC in the treatment of CSP.

Comparison of different treatment strategies in the management of endogenic caesarean scar pregnancy: a multicentre retrospective study

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different treatment strategies for endogenic caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) patients.

Methods

According to Vial’s standard, we defined endogenic-type CSP as (1) the gestational sac growing towards the uterine cavity and (2) a greater than 0.3 cm thickness of myometrial tissue at the caesarean scar. A total of 447 endogenic CSP patients out of 527 patients from 4 medical centres in China were enrolled in this study. A total of 120 patients were treated with methotrexate (MTX) followed by surgery, 106 received ultrasound-guided curettage directly and 221 received curettage combined with hysteroscopy. The clinical information and clinical outcomes of these patients were reviewed. Successful treatment was defined as (1) no additional treatment needed, (2) no retained mass of conception and (3) serum β subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) level returning to a normal level within 4 weeks. The success rate was analysed based on these factors.

Result

Among 447 patients, no significant difference was observed in baseline characteristics between groups except for foetal heartbeat. The success rate was significantly different (p<0.001) among the three groups. The highest success rate of 95.9% was noted in the hysteroscopy group, and the lowest success rate of 84.0% was noted in the curettage group. In addition, the MTX group reported the longest hospital stay and highest expenses, but the curettage group showed the shortest and lowest expenses, respectively. Nevertheless, no difference in blood loss was observed between the groups.

Conclusion

The combination of curettage and hysteroscopy represents the most effective strategy. Pretreatment with MTX did not result in better clinical outcomes. Ultrasound-guided curettage directly should not be considered a first-line treatment choice for endogenic CSP patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04633-y.

Hysteroscopic treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A systematic review

More than 30 regimens, medical and surgical, have been described for the treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancies (CSPs). This study aims to collect and analyze data in the published literature regarding the hysteroscopic management of CSPs focusing on efficacy and complications. Using a protocol registered with Prospero (#CRD42021242314), the electronic databases PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Clinical-Trials.gov and the Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched, from their inception to June 2020. Medical Subject Headings terms such as caesarean ectopic, hysteroscopy and endoscopy were used for the identification of the relevant records. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to design the present systematic review. Eligible articles assessing the role of hysteroscopy in CSP were considered the studies published in peer-reviewed journals. Any studies with less than 10 cases or articles that insufficiently detailed the treatment regimen, the outcomes, and the success rate, were excluded. Selected articles were assessed for the level of evidence, based on Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine guidelines. The methodologic quality, including the risk of bias, was evaluated with the employment of the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool. Ten out of 613 studies were included in the present review comprising 812 women with CSP treated by hysteroscopy. The treatment modalities were divided into three categories: (i) hysteroscopic resection of CSP, (ii) hysteroscopy after preoperative use of HIFU and (iii) preoperative use of UAE before hysteroscopic treatment. The overall success rate of hysteroscopic treatment on CSP cases was 91%, whereas the rate of hemorrhage or excessive vaginal bleeding (>500 mL) and the rate of hysterectomy were 1.66% and 0.28% respectively. According to the results of this systematic review, hysteroscopy appears to be a safe and effective procedure for CSP management. Current findings are primarily based on retrospective studies with poor methodological quality. Multicenter, well-designed studies are needed to draw definite conclusions.

Laparoscopic Isthmocele Repair: Efficacy and Benefits before and after Subsequent Cesarean Section

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of laparoscopic isthmocele repair on isthmocele-related symptoms and/or fertility-related problems. The residual myometrial thickness before and after subsequent cesarean section was also evaluated.

DESIGN

Retrospective, case series.

SETTING

Public university hospital.

POPULATION

Women with isthmocele (residual myometrium < 5 mm) complaining of abnormal uterine bleeding, chronic pelvic pain or secondary infertility not otherwise specified.

METHODS

Women's complaints and the residual myometrium were assessed pre-operatively and at three to six months post-operatively. In patients who conceived after surgery, the latter was measured at least six months after delivery by cesarean section.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Resolution of the main symptom three to six months after surgery and persistence of laparoscopic repair benefits after subsequent cesarean section were considered as primary outcome measures.

RESULTS

Overall, 31 women underwent laparoscopic isthmocele repair. The success rates of the surgery as improvement of abnormal uterine bleeding, chronic pelvic pain and secondary infertility were 71.4% (10 of 14), 83.3% (10 of 12) and 83.3% (10 of 12), respectively. Mean residual myometrial thickness increased significantly from 1.77 mm pre-operatively to 6.67 mm, three to six months post-operatively. Mean myometrial thickness in patients who underwent subsequent cesarean section (N = 7) was 4.49 mm. In this sub-group, there was no significant difference between the mean myometrial thickness measured after the laparoscopic isthmocele repair and that measured after the subsequent cesarean section. None of these patients reported recurrence of their symptoms after delivery.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the laparoscopic isthmocele excision and repair is an appropriate approach for the treatment of isthmocele-related symptoms when done by skilled laparoscopic surgeons. The benefit of this new surgical approach seems to persist even after a subsequent cesarean section. Further investigations and prospective studies are required to confirm this finding.

Robotic or laparoscopic treatment of cesarean scar defects or cesarean scar pregnancies with a uterine sound guidance

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of robotic/laparoscopic repair of cesarean scar defects or cesarean scar pregnancies with a uterine sound.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All consecutive women with cesarean scar defects or cesarean scar pregnancies who underwent robotic/laparoscopic repair with a bent uterine sound guidance were reviewed. Subjective changes in symptoms and objective changes in the depth and width of cesarean scar defects after surgery were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 20 women underwent robotic (n = 3) or conventional laparoscopic (n = 17) repair of cesarean scar defects, which included postmenstrual vaginal bleeding associated with cesarean scar defects (n = 15), cesarean scar pregnancies (n = 3), accumulated pus in the cesarean scar defect (n = 1) and an incomplete abortion incarcerated in the cesarean scar defect (n = 1). Bladder perforation occurred in one woman during robotic adhesiolysis. All women with cesarean scar defects (n = 15) reported an improvement in postmenstrual vaginal bleeding after surgery. Follow-up sonography showed a decrease in the depth and width of the cesarean scar defect and an increase in the residual myometrial thickness.

CONCLUSION

Robotic or laparoscopic repair with a uterine sound guidance seems to be a feasible and effective method in the treatment of cesarean scar defect or cesarean scar pregnancy.

Hysteroscopic treatment and reproductive outcomes in cesarean scar pregnancy: experience at a single institution

OBJECTIVE

To study the risk factors leading to type II/III cesarean scar pregnancy and evaluate the efficacy of hysteroscopic treatment and subsequent reproductive outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective study from 2013 to 2018.

SETTING

Inpatient samples.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 439 patients with cesarean scar pregnancy received hysteroscopic treatment. They were grouped according to the type of surgery as hysteroscopy combined with dilation and curettage, systemic methotrexate followed by hysteroscopy combined with dilation and curettage, and uterine artery embolization or laparoscopic ligation of bilateral uterine arteries followed by hysteroscopy combined with dilation and curettage. Cesarean scar pregnancy was classified as types I, II, and III on the basis of the relationship between the gestational sac and myometrial thickness by ultrasound.

INTERVENTION(S)

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Risk factors leading to type II/III cesarean scar pregnancy. The success of hysteroscopic treatment as well as favorable reproductive outcomes.

RESULT(S)

The significant variables were multiple parity, prior cesarean section (CS), hysteroscopic therapy, and dilation and curettage after the last CS between type I and type II/III. There were significant differences among the three groups in symptoms, largest diameter of the gestational sac, presence of fetal heartbeat, myometrial thickness, type of cesarean scar pregnancy, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and expense. The rates of complications and success were 8.2% and 93.6%, respectively. Thirty-seven women conceived again, and 22 women completed a term pregnancy with no uterine rupture. The recurrence rate of cesarean scar pregnancy was 10.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

The type of cesarean scar pregnancy is related to the rates of multiple parity, cesarean deliveries, and dilation and curettage procedures after the last CS. Hysteroscopic therapy is a safe and effective surgical approach with a low risk of subsequent ectopic pregnancy.

Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treated by Artery Embolization Combined with Diode Laser: A Novel Approach for a Rare Disease

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy which represents a consequence of a previous cesarean section. It is associated with major maternal morbidity and mortality and has potential implications on future fertility. Because of possible serious complications, CSP should be swiftly diagnosed and treated. There is no management protocol for this rare, life-threatening condition, and each patient should be evaluated individually. Several types of conservative treatment have been used to treat cesarean scar pregnancy: dilation and curettage (D&C), excision of trophoblastic tissues, local or systemic administration of methotrexate, bilateral hypogastric artery ligation, and selective uterine artery embolization with curettage and/or methotrexate administration. In our study we present a cesarean scar pregnancy of a 40-year-old woman who was treated with angiographic uterine artery embolization (UAE) followed by hysteroscopic diode laser resection. Our combined UAE–hysteroscopic laser surgery appears to offer an effective, safe, and minimally invasive surgical treatment.

Exploring the value of cesarean section diverticulum area to predict the safety of hysteroscopic management for cesarean scar pregnancy patients

OBJECTIVE

To study indicators predicting the safety of hysteroscopic management for cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study, starting from June 1, 2020. The study included 141 CSP patients who underwent hysteroscopic surgery and met the requirements of gestational age ≤12 weeks, stable vital signs, and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Patients were divided into control group and testing group according to surgical outcomes. Preoperative indicators were compared between the two groups, including a novel indicator, cesarean section diverticulum (CSD) area.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis identified five statistically significant (P < 0.05) factors associated with hysteroscopy failure including a large CSD area. Multifactor logistic regression analysis showed that the only statistically significant indicator of all five factors was the CSD area. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of CSD area was 0.848. Next, we determined three cut-off values for CSD area that can be used to predict the outcome of surgery: 138, 189, and 300 mm² .

CONCLUSION

For the first time, we found that CSD area could predict the safety of hysteroscopic management for CSP patients and might be helpful for clinical decision making. The findings need to be verified by further research.

Early intervention for heterotopic caesarean scar pregnancy to preserve intrauterine pregnancy may improve outcomes: a retrospective cohort study

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the best intervention time and method for patients who are diagnosed with heterotopic caesarean scar pregnancy (HCSP) wishing to preserve intrauterine pregnancy.

DESIGN

Four patients diagnosed with HCSP from January 2014 to May 2019 were enrolled. Because HCSP is rare, data on 27 published cases were extracted to augment the analysis. Clinical characteristics and medical documents related to fetal reduction and subsequent maternal-neonate outcomes were analysed.

RESULTS

The intervention time was significantly earlier in the full-term birth group (6.76 ± 1.05 weeks) compared with pre-term birth group (8.02 ± 1.55 weeks; P = 0.042). The cumulative full-term delivery rate was 91.48% when the intervention was at 6 weeks' gestation and decreased to 42.02% at 8 weeks. The maternal-neonate outcome was similar among the selective fetal reduction and surgical removal groups as was delivery time (34.68 ± 3.12 versus 34.80 ± 6.64 weeks; P = 0.955). In the four cases undergoing selective fetal reduction, the residual mass grew by 1.16-7.07 times compared with the area before reduction. The maximum size of the residual mass was observed at 12-13 weeks and 22-25 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with HCSP who choose to keep intrauterine pregnancy will be able to carry the fetus to term. Selective fetal reduction would be the first intervention of choice and should take place immediately after diagnosis. The residual mass after reduction could continue to grow throughout the whole pregnancy, although this should not be considered as an indication for termination. With good supervision and careful management, the pregnancy could be maintained and carried to term.

A novel method for typing of cesarean scar pregnancy based on size of cesarean scar diverticulum and its significance in clinical decision-making

AIM

There is currently no universally accepted method for typing of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) to guide the choice of treatment approach. We introduce a new method for typing CSP and investigate its clinical significance.

METHOD

Clinical data of 198 patients with CSP were collected and analyzed. The patients were divided into three types according to the size of their cesarean scar diverticula (CSD), measured by magnetic resonance imaging: type I (size of CSD ≤40 mm), type II (40 mm < size of CSD ≤70 mm) and type III (size of CSD >70 mm).

RESULTS

With increase in the type level, the risk of adverse events increased significantly (χ² = 36.345, P = 0.000). There was a significant difference in the choice of the treatment approaches in various types of the patients (χ² = 27.106, P = 0.000). With increase in the type level, the invasiveness level of the treatment approach increased significantly (R = 0.405, P = 0.000). Further analysis found two other factors that influenced treatment choice.

CONCLUSION

Our study, for the first time, demonstrates the value of size of CSD in typing of CSP and, thereby supplements the CSP typing system with a novel quantitative indicator. This typing method is of significance for evaluation of risk of CSP and guiding the choice of treatment approach. This typing method, combined with the two features of cesarean scar thickness and lesions protruding outside the uterine contour, will improve the risk assessment of CSP and the rationale of treatment plan formulation for this condition.

False diagnosis of and needless therapy for presumed gestational trophoblastic disease in women with an unusual site of residual pregnancy

Objective

This study aimed to determine the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), hysteroscopy, and laparoscopy to avoid unnecessary treatment when patients present with clinical manifestations that are close to those of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN).

Methods

Three patients who were falsely diagnosed with presumed GTN and received needless chemotherapy in our hospital from July 2011 to March 2012 were studied. We also reviewed data of patients with similar clinical features who were diagnosed as having residual pregnancy in recent years. Clinical manifestations were evaluated.

Results

All three patients had persistently high serum β-human chorionic gonadotrophin levels and a mass with abundant blood supply in the uterus after termination of pregnancy. The patients were diagnosed with GTN and underwent chemotherapy. They responded poorly to chemotherapy and underwent surgery. The pathological diagnosis in all patients was residual pregnancy. In recent years, no patients were misdiagnosed because pelvic MRI, hysteroscopy, or laparoscopy was used when residual pregnancy could not be excluded.

Conclusion

Gynecologists should diagnose carefully when patients present with clinical manifestations that are close to those of GTN to avoid unnecessary treatment. MRI, hysteroscopy, and laparoscopy could be important examinations for excluding residual pregnancy.

Successful management of cesarean scar pregnancy with vacuum extraction under ultrasound guidance

Aim

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare type of ectopic pregnancy. The gestational sac is implanted in the myometrium at the site of a previous cesarean section. Mothers with CSP are faced with risks of unpredictable massive bleeding or more fatal complications. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the feasibility, efficacy, and reliability of the intraoperative ultrasound‐guided vacuum aspiration method as an effective treatment option for CSP.

Methods

We undertook a retrospective analysis of CSP patients who had undergone the vacuum aspiration method, by reviewing patient records from the period October 2015 to January 2018. All of the operations were carried out under general anesthesia, with patients in the lithotomy position, using suprapubic ultrasonography guidance. A vacuum aspirator was used to aspirate the whole pregnancy material without perforating the previous cesarean section scar.

Results

Ten women with CSP were managed successfully by ultrasound‐guided vacuum extraction without complications or further interventions, such as reoperation or methotrexate administration. Three of the 10 patients needed uterine Foley catheter tampon (50 cc) for 4 h after vacuum extraction alone was applied. During the study period, two additional patients who did not meet the criteria for the vacuum extraction method alone were managed with methotrexate plus vacuum application. Because of the rarity of the condition, the majority of CSPs are case reports or small case series reported in published works, with no consensus on the preferred course of treatment.

Conclusion

The vacuum extraction method seems to be a good and practical way of treating CSP. Comparisons of efficacy should be undertaken but large sample sizes are required. We hope this study brings a new perspective for larger sample‐sized studies, considering the technique is feasible and applicable.