Prenatal diagnosis of mosaicism for trisomy 2 in a single colony at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome

Low-level mosaic trisomy 2 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with positive NIPT and CVS results for trisomy 2, maternal uniparental disomy 2, perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line, cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes, intrauterine growth restriction and a favorable fetal outcome

OBJECTIVE

We present low-level mosaic trisomy 2 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with positive non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and chorionic villus sampling (CVS) results for trisomy 2, maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) 2, perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line, cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and a favorable fetal outcome.

CASE REPORT

A 35-year-old, primigravid woman underwent amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation because both NIPT at 9 weeks of gestation and CVS at 11 weeks of gestation revealed trisomy 2. This pregnancy was conceived by in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer (ET). Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+2[11]/46,XY[19]. Prenatal ultrasound findings were normal. She was referred to the hospital for genetic counseling at 20 weeks of gestation, and repeat amniocentesis performed at 24 weeks of gestation revealed a karyotype of 46,XY (22/22 colonies). The parental karyotypes were normal. Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis on the DNA extracted from uncultured amniocytes and parental bloods revealed maternal uniparental heterodisomy of chromosome 2. Simultaneous molecular cytogenetic analysis on uncultured amniocytes showed the results of arr 2p25.3q37.3 × 2.4 with a log₂ ratio = 0.26, consistent with 40% mosaicism for trisomy 2 by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), and 28% (28/100 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 2 by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Despite IUGR on fetal ultrasound, the woman was advised to continue the pregnancy, and a 2252-g phenotypically normal male baby was delivered at 38 weeks of gestation. The karyotypes of cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta were 46,XY (40/40 colonies), 46,XY (40/40 colonies) and 47,XY,+2[9]/46,XY[31], respectively. QF-PCR analysis on cord blood, umbilical cord and placenta confirmed uniparental heterodisomy of chromosome 2 in the cord blood and umbilical cord, and maternal origin of trisomy 2 in the placenta. FISH analysis on buccal mucosal cells at age 1.5 months revealed 8.7% (9/104 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 2. When follow-up at age four months, the neonate manifested a normal phenotype except intermittent hypoventilation. Molecular analysis of the PHOX2B gene revealed a normal result. When follow-up at age one year, he manifested normal development.

CONCLUSION

Mosaic trisomy 2 at prenatal diagnosis should alert the possibility of UPD 2 and include a UPD 2 testing. Low-level mosaic trisomy 2 at amniocentesis can be associated with perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line and a favorable fetal outcome.

Prenatal diagnosis of mosaicism for trisomy 12 in a single colony at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome

OBJECTIVE

We present prenatal diagnosis of mosaicism for trisomy 12 in a single colony at amniocentesis with a favorable outcome.

CASE REPORT

A 36-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 18 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+12[1]/46,XY[14]. In 15 colonies of cultured amniocytes, all three cells in one colony had the karyotype of 47,XY,+12, while the rest 14 colonies had the karyotype of 46,XY. The parental karyotypes were normal. Prenatal ultrasound findings were unremarkable. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis using the DNAs extracted from cultured amniocytes and parental bloods excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 12. At 37 weeks of gestation, a healthy 2,828-g male baby was delivered with no phenotypic abnormality. The cord blood had a karyotype of 46,XY in 40/40 lymphocytes. Postnatal interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on buccal cells and urinary cells revealed normal signals in 72/72 buccal cells, and trisomy 12 signals in 1/47 (2.1%) urinary cells compared with 0% (0/75 cells) of trisomy 12 signals in the normal control.

CONCLUSION

Mosaicism for trisomy 12 in a single colony at amniocentesis without UPD 12 and fetal ultrasound abnormalities can be associated with a favorable outcome.

Prenatal diagnosis of mosaicism for double trisomies of trisomy 11 and trisomy 12 in a single colony at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome

OBJECTIVE

We present prenatal diagnosis of mosaicism for double trisomies of trisomy 11 and trisomy 12 in a single colony at amniocentesis with a favorable outcome.

CASE REPORT

A 23-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 24 weeks of gestation because of congenital bowel dilation in the fetus. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 48,XX,+11,+12[1]/46,XX[24]. In 25 colonies of cultured amniocytes, all five cells in one colony had the karyotype of 48,XX,+11,+12, while the rest 24 colonies had the karyotype of 46,XX. The parental karyotypes were normal. Repeat amniocentesis was performed at 26 weeks of gestation. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) were applied on the uncultured amniocytes, and conventional cytogenetic analysis was applied on cultured amniocytes. Interphase FISH analysis showed no trisomy 11 signal and no trisomy 12 signal in 102 uncultured amniocytes. QF-PCR analysis excluded uniparental disomy (UPD) 11 and UPD 12. aCGH analysis showed no genomic imbalance. The cultured amniocytes at repeat amniocentesis had the karyotype of 46,XX in 13/13 colonies. At term, a healthy 3445-g female baby was delivered with no phenotypic abnormality except imperforate anus and a perianal fistula. The cord blood had a karyotype of 46,XX in 40/40 lymphocytes. Postnatal interphase FISH analysis of buccal cells and urinary cells revealed trisomies 11 and 12 signals in 11/111 (9.9%) buccal cells compared with 3% in normal control, and in 3/103 (2.9%) urinary cells compared with 0.98% in normal control.

CONCLUSION

Mosaicism for double trisomies of trisomy 11 and trisomy 12 in a single colony at amniocentesis without UPD 11 and UPD 12 can be associated with a favorable outcome.

Prenatal diagnosis of mosaicism for trisomy 11 in a single colony at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome

OBJECTIVE

We present prenatal diagnosis of mosaicism for trisomy 11 in a single colony at amniocentesis with a favorable outcome.

CASE REPORT

A 34-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 16 weeks of gestation because of advanced maternal age. Amniocentesis revealed a result of 47,XY,+11[1]/46,XY[9]. In 10 colonies of cultured amniocytes, all five cells in one colony had a karyotype of trisomy 11, while the rest nine colonies had a normal karyotype. The parental karyotypes were normal. Repeat amniocentesis was performed at 19 weeks of gestation. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was applied on the uncultured amniocytes, and the result showed no trisomy 11 signals in 56/56 uncultured amniocytes. Uniparental disomy (UPD) 11 was excluded by polymorphic DNA marker analysis. The cultured amniocytes at repeat amniocentesis had a karyotype of 46,XY. Prenatal ultrasound findings were unremarkable. A healthy 3084-g male baby was delivered at 38 weeks of gestation. The karyotype of cord blood lymphocytes was 46,XY. The boy was phenotypically normal at age 10 months at follow-ups. The interphase FISH analysis on urinary cells revealed no trisomy 11 signal.

CONCLUSION

Mosaicism for trisomy 11 in a single colony at amniocentesis without UPD 11 can be associated with a favorable outcome.

Higher male prevalence of chromosomal mosaicism detected by amniocentesis

OBJECTIVE

To present the calculated frequencies, male to female sex-ratio, and modes of ascertainments in different levels of chromosomal mosaicism (CM) detected at amniocentesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This's a 10-years retrospective study between January 2008 and December 2017 and there were 13,752 cases of amniocentesis performed in MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Eight hundred and thirty four cases of CM were collected in this study. We reviewed their types of chromosomal abnormalities of mosaicism, the modes of ascertainment (including: advanced maternal age, abnormal ultrasound findings, abnormal maternal serum screening result, and other reasons), maternal age, gestational age at amniocentesis, fetal gender, and perinatal findings. After amniocentesis, in situ culture was performed and the results of karyotype with CM were divided in to three levels.

RESULTS

In our sample of 13,752 amniocentesis, 834 cases with all levels of CM were collected in this study. Of them, there were 562 cases (4.09%) with level I mosaicism, 207 cases (1.51%) of level II mosaicism, and 65 cases (0.47%) of level III mosaicism (Table 1). In the group of advanced of maternal age (AMA), their calculated frequencies, 4.18% in level I, 1.46% in level II and 0.41% in level III, were very similar to those in total cases (p value = 0.206) without statistical significance. In the group of abnormal ultrasound findings, the calculated frequency was much higher in level III (0.87%), however, there was no statistical significance because of the small numbers of level III. In our cases of amniocentesis, the case numbers of male case (50.20%) is very similar to female (49.80%), and the male to female ratio was 1.01. But, we found more cases of male with CM (444 cases) than female (390 cases). The sex-ratio in different levels' calculated frequencies of CM showed similar in level I, and male prevalence was found in level II and III with statistical significance (p value = 0.022). The male prevalence also revealed in both numerical and structural abnormalities in level II and level III, but no difference in the cases of level I.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our observation showed a novel finding of higher male prevalence of CM in level II and III, and both in numerical and structural abnormalities. It's consistent with the theory of better survival in male embryo after partial self-correction of initial chromosomal aberrations, male-specific selection against chromosomal abnormalities.